SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 30
April 10, 2013
Planning Period PD
   Use GradeCam to assess the group of participants
    about their pop culture knowledge
      ▪ This would be a formative assessment given during a unit on Pop
        Culture based on the KUD below

       Know                Understand                      Do
celebrities in the      Understand that           comprehend and
news                    UsWeekly is a valuable    analyze articles to
                        tool to acquire pop       obtain pop culture
                        culture knowledge in
                                                  information
                        order to stay current
                        with celebrity culture.

      ▪ Based on correct responses, participants will be split up into 2
        groups
      ▪ Us WEEKLY is used solely for modeling purposes
   Review the concepts of RtI

   Understand the connection between
    Differentiated Instruction by Readiness and
    RtI

   Analyze three examples of Intervening via
    Differentiation by Readiness
   We are not the Differentiation Team!

     If you have any questions about differentiation or
     any of the differentiated lessons discussed today,
     please contact a member of the Differentiation
     Team.

     Each department has a representative that is
     willing and able to answer your questions!
   Strategies
     The combination of research-based methods or
     activities designed to teach the learning objective.

   Interventions
     Program, actions, or strategies specifically
     designed to address an identified deficiency and
     monitored to ensure outcome improvement .
             (Taken from LTHS PLC Glossary (p.7))
 “Current knowledge, understanding, and skill
    level a student has related to a particular
    sequence of learning” (Tomlinson & Strickland 6).

 Readiness is influenced by a student’s prior
    learning and life experiences, attitudes about
    school, and habits of mind (Tomlinson 3).
   Goal of DI by Readiness:
     “Make the work a little too difficult for students at a given
      point in their growth- and then to provide the support they
      need to succeed at a new level of challenge”
      (Tomlinson & Strickland 6).
   All groups MUST be challenged appropriately
    with quality level tasks.
     ZPD—Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development
     Scaffolding

   All groups should be evaluated for their
    understanding of the learning objective (KUD).
     Not an evaluation of the task students are
     completing, rather an evaluation of their
     UNDERSTANDING!
   Struggling learners need interventions to meet learning
    objectives (KUD)
   DI by Readiness can be used to facilitate the delivery of
    an intervention to struggling students
   Struggling learners make up the lowest level readiness
    group
   Example activities for struggling learners include:
       Mini-lectures/mini-lessons
       Guided practice and instructions
       Analysis of supplemental materials
       Peer review and peer teaching
   When DI for Readiness is intentionally used
    and monitored to address students who are
    not reaching the learning objectives, it
    becomes an intervention.
1. Students who do not meet learning objectives
     are identified as “struggling learners”.

2. DI by Readiness lesson is planned and
     delivered
 ▪    Struggling learners are placed in the lowest-level group and
      receive an intervention as their quality level task/activity


3. Growth is monitored
 ▪ Formative and post-assessments are used to monitor growth
 ▪ Mid-quarter/quarter grades
    Pop culture activity
           Know               Understand                     Do
    Celebrities in the     Understand that           Comprehend and
    news                   UsWeekly is a valuable    analyze articles to
                           tool to acquire pop       obtain pop culture
                           culture knowledge in
                                                     information
                           order to stay current
                           with celebrity culture.

    At your table you will find an activity to be completed based on your pop
     culture quiz results.
    Read the directions and complete the activity with your table.

    Post assessment would be given to low level group after the activity,
     the next day, or at a later time if the intervention is going to continue.
   Identification
     Pop Culture quiz was used to determine grouping
      ▪ This would have been given as a formative assessment during
        a unit on pop culture

   Intervention
     Graphic organizer can be used in multiple ways to
      help students acquire information
      ▪ While one group received the intervention, the other worked
        on enrichment activity

   Progress Monitoring
     Post-assessment scores of low level group are used to
      monitor the growth of students
   Several teachers submitted their DI by Readiness
    lessons and explained how an intervention was
    able to take place during the lessons.
   We will share with you examples from:
     American Studies
     Chemistry
     Music
   Know:
    1) How to integrate quotes in a response
    2) Reasons O’Brien averted the draft and then returned – English
    3) Reasons anyone would support the war and reasons they
    wouldn’t – History
   Understand:
    Students will understand that some quotes work better than
    others to support an argument.
   Do:
    1) Write a summary about the draft properly integrating two key
    phrases as support (Prep). Write a summary of an article from
    Rolling Stone called “The Kill Team” while properly integrating two
    key phrases as support(Accel)
    2) Write a persuasive paragraph that explains what they would do
    with regard to the draft and the Vietnam War while integrating
    textual support and historical content.
   Pre-assessment and Lesson
     Pre-assessment given to determine readiness levels of
      students for initial activities
      ▪ Read non-fiction article and wrote 5 sentence summary integrating two
        quotes (handed in before the end of class)
      ▪ Based on written responses and the use of a rubric, students were
        broken up into groups the next day
     Small groups worked on specific areas of writing based on pre-
      assessment

   Identification
     Students not making growth towards learning
      objectives, based on formative assessments, move on to an
   Intervention
     Activities designed based on students’ areas of deficit
      with integrating quotes in a response
      ▪ These are activities different than the initial lesson
      ▪ Remember, the intervention is teaching the student in a
        different way, not just re-teaching the same lesson!
     Teacher directed support given to struggling students
      to help students recognize and rectify the deficiency
     Took place over a week with plenty of opportunity for
      students to practice writing and receive teacher
      instruction/feedback
   Progress Monitoring
     Post-assessment was given to all students, with
     specific attention to struggling students’ growth
     Students had 30 minutes in class to write a
     response integrating quotes
     Rubric was used to determine the growth made
     based on comparison to initial rubric
     Rubric score was used as a grade for students
Know                         Understand                           Do
Basic molar conversions     The students will understand    Group 1: Work on basic
from g  mol and mol        that % concentration is         problems in order to
g                          calculated using the equation   reinforce concept of molarity
Differentiate parts of a    Mass of solute                  and % concentration
solution (i.e. solute and   Mass of solution *100           Group 2: Work on
solvent)                                                    intermediate problems that
Methods of making a                                         stress molarity and %
solution of known           The students will understand    concentration
concentration               that molarity is calculated     Group 3: Apply knowledge
                            using                           of molarity and %
                            Mol of solute                   concentration in order to
                            Liters of sol’n                 make a solution of known
                                                            molarity and % concentration
   Pre-assessment and Lesson
     Students were given an exit slip (pre-assessment) the
     day before the lesson took place
      ▪ Next day grouping-- Teacher tells students which group
        they are in by writing a 1, 2, or 3 on their exit slips
        ▪ 1.5 or less correct were placed in group 1
        ▪ 2-3.5 correct were placed in group 2
        ▪ all 4 correct were placed in group 3

   Identification
     Students not making growth towards learning objectives,
     based on formative assessments, move on to an intervention
   Intervention

     Teacher directed instruction with struggling
     students in small group while moving around
     room to help other groups as needed
      ▪ Teacher directed (mini-lesson; Q &A)
      ▪ Step-by-step instructions
      ▪ Close eye on the students needing intervention
   Progress Monitoring
     The post assessment was a lab, “Concentration of
     a Solution”
     All students worked on the lab and were required
     to turn in their sheet showing the calculation of
     the molarity and percent concentration of the
     solution
     Group 1’s scores were analyzed for progress made
     towards learning objectives
   Know:
     Students will KNOW the grand staff, pitch letter
     names, the origin of staff notation, Guido of
     Arezzo, Medieval Era of Music.
   Understand:
     Students will UNDERSTAND how music is notated.

   Do:
     Students will (DO) identify all pitches on the grand
     staff.
   Identification:
     Pre-assessment was given to determine readiness
     levels regarding students’ knowledge about note
     names on the grand staff

     Pre-assessment data was used to develop tiered
     tasks to meet all levels of learners
   Intervention
     Students not meeting the learning objectives
     were to work on Task 1 of the tiered task

     Students were provided with teacher directed
     instruction in a small group
   Progress Monitoring
     Post-assessment was given to all students, with
     specific attention to struggling students’ progress

     The post-assessment was a final test used as a
     grade
   With these great lessons in mind, think of an
    upcoming unit that you anticipate having
    students that struggle with the material.

   Talk with a partner about ways you could
    Differentiate by Readiness to intervene with
    the ‘struggling learners’.
   Teachers that provided DI by Readiness
    lessons:
     Virginia Condon, Jennifer Setzke, Jessica Roessler,
     Ben Lafontaine (American Studies)

     Jaime Bronuskas (Chemistry)


     Alysia Lambert (Music)
   Concepts of RtI
       Identify, plan and deliver intervention, progress
        monitor growth

   Connection between DI by Readiness and RtI
       DI by Readiness is a method for implementing
        interventions with struggling learners

   Three GREAT examples were presented!
Buffum, A., Mattos, M., & Weber, C. (2009). Pyramid response
  to intervention: RTI, professional learning communities, and
  how to respond when kids don’t learn. Bloomington, IN:
  Solution Tree Press.
Johnson, E., Smith, L., & Harris, M. (2009). How RTI works in
  secondary schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Tomlinson, C.A. & Strickland, C. A. (2005). Differentiation in
  practice: A resource guide for differentiating curriculum –
  Grades 9-12. ASCD: Alexandria, Virginia.
(2012). LTHS professional learning communities glossary.
  LTHS: LaGrange, IL.
Thank you for attending!!!

More Related Content

What's hot

Exploring the curriculum(fs4)
Exploring the curriculum(fs4)Exploring the curriculum(fs4)
Exploring the curriculum(fs4)Ysa Garcera
 
4 discussion issues on teaching approaches.
4 discussion issues on teaching approaches.4 discussion issues on teaching approaches.
4 discussion issues on teaching approaches.Sarjan Paul Vosko
 
Field Study 2 (FS 2) - Episode 2 [2018]
Field Study 2 (FS 2) - Episode 2 [2018]Field Study 2 (FS 2) - Episode 2 [2018]
Field Study 2 (FS 2) - Episode 2 [2018]Mark Jhon Oxillo
 
Field Study - Learning Assessment Strategies.
Field Study - Learning Assessment Strategies.Field Study - Learning Assessment Strategies.
Field Study - Learning Assessment Strategies.gluisito1997
 
Assessment Presentation
Assessment PresentationAssessment Presentation
Assessment PresentationBronxgrl4eva
 
Aahperd 2011 tpsr final
Aahperd 2011 tpsr finalAahperd 2011 tpsr final
Aahperd 2011 tpsr finaltpsralliance
 
Assessment
AssessmentAssessment
Assessmentgamid111
 
Tugasan 4 penilaian kendiri teks
Tugasan 4 penilaian kendiri teksTugasan 4 penilaian kendiri teks
Tugasan 4 penilaian kendiri tekstengkunini
 
GILE Forum 2014 - Handout
GILE Forum 2014 - HandoutGILE Forum 2014 - Handout
GILE Forum 2014 - HandoutBrent Jones
 
Academic Parent-Teacher Teams: Family Engagement as an Instructional Strategy...
Academic Parent-Teacher Teams: Family Engagement as an Instructional Strategy...Academic Parent-Teacher Teams: Family Engagement as an Instructional Strategy...
Academic Parent-Teacher Teams: Family Engagement as an Instructional Strategy...CPEDInitiative
 
Collab.counts.wkg tog.crosscurrents.am.2012
Collab.counts.wkg tog.crosscurrents.am.2012Collab.counts.wkg tog.crosscurrents.am.2012
Collab.counts.wkg tog.crosscurrents.am.2012Faye Brownlie
 
2013-02-25 to 2013-03-28 - Summative Evaluation of Field Experience
2013-02-25 to 2013-03-28 - Summative Evaluation of Field Experience2013-02-25 to 2013-03-28 - Summative Evaluation of Field Experience
2013-02-25 to 2013-03-28 - Summative Evaluation of Field ExperienceDaniel Genesee
 
7601EPS Lecture 4 Sem1 2008
7601EPS Lecture 4 Sem1 20087601EPS Lecture 4 Sem1 2008
7601EPS Lecture 4 Sem1 2008Jason Zagami
 
Mini Proposal Research
Mini Proposal ResearchMini Proposal Research
Mini Proposal ResearchDea SR
 
LARC STARTALK differentiation handout 2011
LARC STARTALK differentiation handout 2011LARC STARTALK differentiation handout 2011
LARC STARTALK differentiation handout 2011Toni Theisen
 

What's hot (20)

Exploring the curriculum(fs4)
Exploring the curriculum(fs4)Exploring the curriculum(fs4)
Exploring the curriculum(fs4)
 
EDSS 620 Day 2
EDSS 620 Day 2EDSS 620 Day 2
EDSS 620 Day 2
 
4 discussion issues on teaching approaches.
4 discussion issues on teaching approaches.4 discussion issues on teaching approaches.
4 discussion issues on teaching approaches.
 
Field Study 2 (FS 2) - Episode 2 [2018]
Field Study 2 (FS 2) - Episode 2 [2018]Field Study 2 (FS 2) - Episode 2 [2018]
Field Study 2 (FS 2) - Episode 2 [2018]
 
Field study 4 and 5
Field study 4 and 5Field study 4 and 5
Field study 4 and 5
 
Field Study - Learning Assessment Strategies.
Field Study - Learning Assessment Strategies.Field Study - Learning Assessment Strategies.
Field Study - Learning Assessment Strategies.
 
Assessment Presentation
Assessment PresentationAssessment Presentation
Assessment Presentation
 
Field study 2
Field study 2Field study 2
Field study 2
 
Aahperd 2011 tpsr final
Aahperd 2011 tpsr finalAahperd 2011 tpsr final
Aahperd 2011 tpsr final
 
Assessment
AssessmentAssessment
Assessment
 
Tugasan 4 penilaian kendiri teks
Tugasan 4 penilaian kendiri teksTugasan 4 penilaian kendiri teks
Tugasan 4 penilaian kendiri teks
 
GILE Forum 2014 - Handout
GILE Forum 2014 - HandoutGILE Forum 2014 - Handout
GILE Forum 2014 - Handout
 
Goal
GoalGoal
Goal
 
Academic Parent-Teacher Teams: Family Engagement as an Instructional Strategy...
Academic Parent-Teacher Teams: Family Engagement as an Instructional Strategy...Academic Parent-Teacher Teams: Family Engagement as an Instructional Strategy...
Academic Parent-Teacher Teams: Family Engagement as an Instructional Strategy...
 
Collab.counts.wkg tog.crosscurrents.am.2012
Collab.counts.wkg tog.crosscurrents.am.2012Collab.counts.wkg tog.crosscurrents.am.2012
Collab.counts.wkg tog.crosscurrents.am.2012
 
2013-02-25 to 2013-03-28 - Summative Evaluation of Field Experience
2013-02-25 to 2013-03-28 - Summative Evaluation of Field Experience2013-02-25 to 2013-03-28 - Summative Evaluation of Field Experience
2013-02-25 to 2013-03-28 - Summative Evaluation of Field Experience
 
Field Study 4 Exploring the Curriculum
Field Study 4 Exploring the CurriculumField Study 4 Exploring the Curriculum
Field Study 4 Exploring the Curriculum
 
7601EPS Lecture 4 Sem1 2008
7601EPS Lecture 4 Sem1 20087601EPS Lecture 4 Sem1 2008
7601EPS Lecture 4 Sem1 2008
 
Mini Proposal Research
Mini Proposal ResearchMini Proposal Research
Mini Proposal Research
 
LARC STARTALK differentiation handout 2011
LARC STARTALK differentiation handout 2011LARC STARTALK differentiation handout 2011
LARC STARTALK differentiation handout 2011
 

Similar to The link between di by readiness and intervention final

01 Ubd Pd Jan 2010
01  Ubd Pd Jan 201001  Ubd Pd Jan 2010
01 Ubd Pd Jan 2010rxg581
 
Differentiation presentation
Differentiation presentationDifferentiation presentation
Differentiation presentationCarla Anderson
 
Assignment Instructional Practices for Emergent Literacy Learners.docx
Assignment Instructional Practices for Emergent Literacy Learners.docxAssignment Instructional Practices for Emergent Literacy Learners.docx
Assignment Instructional Practices for Emergent Literacy Learners.docxrock73
 
DLP ppt.pptx
DLP ppt.pptxDLP ppt.pptx
DLP ppt.pptxRonnel33
 
Group Powerpoint - Assessment for Learning
Group Powerpoint - Assessment for LearningGroup Powerpoint - Assessment for Learning
Group Powerpoint - Assessment for LearningGregory Familton
 
Effective Teaching Stratgies.pptx
Effective Teaching Stratgies.pptxEffective Teaching Stratgies.pptx
Effective Teaching Stratgies.pptxAmmaraHussain4
 
monroe_Science content day 1 & 2 power point 2012
monroe_Science content day 1 & 2 power point 2012monroe_Science content day 1 & 2 power point 2012
monroe_Science content day 1 & 2 power point 2012klmonroe
 
Wormeli differentiated instruction_may_2009_color_version
Wormeli differentiated instruction_may_2009_color_versionWormeli differentiated instruction_may_2009_color_version
Wormeli differentiated instruction_may_2009_color_versionguest4c52cc4
 
PerDev_Week 3.docx
PerDev_Week 3.docxPerDev_Week 3.docx
PerDev_Week 3.docxJaredLeynes2
 
FORMATIVE TO SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT
FORMATIVE TO SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENTFORMATIVE TO SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT
FORMATIVE TO SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENTArchana Dwivedi
 
MYP Unit Planner Curious Incident
MYP Unit Planner Curious IncidentMYP Unit Planner Curious Incident
MYP Unit Planner Curious Incidentaissaigon
 
Prepare d planning outstanding inquiry units- Next Steps Oct 2014
Prepare d planning outstanding inquiry units- Next Steps Oct 2014Prepare d planning outstanding inquiry units- Next Steps Oct 2014
Prepare d planning outstanding inquiry units- Next Steps Oct 2014Adrian Bertolini
 
MYP unit planner yr6-t2-Are you a have or have not
MYP unit planner yr6-t2-Are you a have or have notMYP unit planner yr6-t2-Are you a have or have not
MYP unit planner yr6-t2-Are you a have or have notaissaigon
 
Myp unit planner yr6-t2-are you a have or have not
Myp unit planner yr6-t2-are you a have or have notMyp unit planner yr6-t2-are you a have or have not
Myp unit planner yr6-t2-are you a have or have notaissaigon
 
PiXL National Conference - 2nd December 2013 - Inspirational Leadership by @T...
PiXL National Conference - 2nd December 2013 - Inspirational Leadership by @T...PiXL National Conference - 2nd December 2013 - Inspirational Leadership by @T...
PiXL National Conference - 2nd December 2013 - Inspirational Leadership by @T...Ross Morrison McGill
 

Similar to The link between di by readiness and intervention final (20)

01 Ubd Pd Jan 2010
01  Ubd Pd Jan 201001  Ubd Pd Jan 2010
01 Ubd Pd Jan 2010
 
DETC Paper
DETC PaperDETC Paper
DETC Paper
 
Differentiation presentation
Differentiation presentationDifferentiation presentation
Differentiation presentation
 
Assignment Instructional Practices for Emergent Literacy Learners.docx
Assignment Instructional Practices for Emergent Literacy Learners.docxAssignment Instructional Practices for Emergent Literacy Learners.docx
Assignment Instructional Practices for Emergent Literacy Learners.docx
 
Session 5
Session 5Session 5
Session 5
 
DLP ppt.pptx
DLP ppt.pptxDLP ppt.pptx
DLP ppt.pptx
 
Giving feedback
Giving feedbackGiving feedback
Giving feedback
 
Group Powerpoint - Assessment for Learning
Group Powerpoint - Assessment for LearningGroup Powerpoint - Assessment for Learning
Group Powerpoint - Assessment for Learning
 
Effective Teaching Stratgies.pptx
Effective Teaching Stratgies.pptxEffective Teaching Stratgies.pptx
Effective Teaching Stratgies.pptx
 
monroe_Science content day 1 & 2 power point 2012
monroe_Science content day 1 & 2 power point 2012monroe_Science content day 1 & 2 power point 2012
monroe_Science content day 1 & 2 power point 2012
 
Wormeli differentiated instruction_may_2009_color_version
Wormeli differentiated instruction_may_2009_color_versionWormeli differentiated instruction_may_2009_color_version
Wormeli differentiated instruction_may_2009_color_version
 
PerDev_Week 3.docx
PerDev_Week 3.docxPerDev_Week 3.docx
PerDev_Week 3.docx
 
PSYCHOSOCIAL-DLL-1.docx
PSYCHOSOCIAL-DLL-1.docxPSYCHOSOCIAL-DLL-1.docx
PSYCHOSOCIAL-DLL-1.docx
 
Curriculum by Design
Curriculum by DesignCurriculum by Design
Curriculum by Design
 
FORMATIVE TO SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT
FORMATIVE TO SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENTFORMATIVE TO SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT
FORMATIVE TO SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT
 
MYP Unit Planner Curious Incident
MYP Unit Planner Curious IncidentMYP Unit Planner Curious Incident
MYP Unit Planner Curious Incident
 
Prepare d planning outstanding inquiry units- Next Steps Oct 2014
Prepare d planning outstanding inquiry units- Next Steps Oct 2014Prepare d planning outstanding inquiry units- Next Steps Oct 2014
Prepare d planning outstanding inquiry units- Next Steps Oct 2014
 
MYP unit planner yr6-t2-Are you a have or have not
MYP unit planner yr6-t2-Are you a have or have notMYP unit planner yr6-t2-Are you a have or have not
MYP unit planner yr6-t2-Are you a have or have not
 
Myp unit planner yr6-t2-are you a have or have not
Myp unit planner yr6-t2-are you a have or have notMyp unit planner yr6-t2-are you a have or have not
Myp unit planner yr6-t2-are you a have or have not
 
PiXL National Conference - 2nd December 2013 - Inspirational Leadership by @T...
PiXL National Conference - 2nd December 2013 - Inspirational Leadership by @T...PiXL National Conference - 2nd December 2013 - Inspirational Leadership by @T...
PiXL National Conference - 2nd December 2013 - Inspirational Leadership by @T...
 

More from Jeremy

Formative seven june 2015
Formative seven june 2015Formative seven june 2015
Formative seven june 2015Jeremy
 
Differentiated instruction.summer workshop.2015
Differentiated instruction.summer workshop.2015Differentiated instruction.summer workshop.2015
Differentiated instruction.summer workshop.2015Jeremy
 
Literacy summer workshop 2015
Literacy summer workshop 2015Literacy summer workshop 2015
Literacy summer workshop 2015Jeremy
 
How writing anchors literacy instruction
How writing anchors literacy instructionHow writing anchors literacy instruction
How writing anchors literacy instructionJeremy
 
How writing anchirs literacy instruction
How writing anchirs literacy instructionHow writing anchirs literacy instruction
How writing anchirs literacy instructionJeremy
 
Close Reading
Close ReadingClose Reading
Close ReadingJeremy
 
Finalizing e us & eos
Finalizing e us & eosFinalizing e us & eos
Finalizing e us & eosJeremy
 
Selected Response Assessment
Selected Response AssessmentSelected Response Assessment
Selected Response AssessmentJeremy
 
Performance Based Assessment
Performance  Based AssessmentPerformance  Based Assessment
Performance Based AssessmentJeremy
 
Introducing the Common Core October 2 2014
Introducing the Common Core October 2 2014Introducing the Common Core October 2 2014
Introducing the Common Core October 2 2014Jeremy
 
Operations in proofs review
Operations in proofs reviewOperations in proofs review
Operations in proofs reviewJeremy
 
Using DOK to Write Common Assessments
Using DOK to Write Common AssessmentsUsing DOK to Write Common Assessments
Using DOK to Write Common AssessmentsJeremy
 
Mastery Manager Training
Mastery Manager TrainingMastery Manager Training
Mastery Manager TrainingJeremy
 
Mastery manager training 1
Mastery manager training 1Mastery manager training 1
Mastery manager training 1Jeremy
 
Follow up table talk march 18
Follow up table talk march 18Follow up table talk march 18
Follow up table talk march 18Jeremy
 
Revised using rubrics to facilitate self-assessment and self-reflection
Revised  using rubrics to facilitate self-assessment and self-reflectionRevised  using rubrics to facilitate self-assessment and self-reflection
Revised using rubrics to facilitate self-assessment and self-reflectionJeremy
 
3 10-14 formative assessment with the mathematics ccss
3 10-14 formative assessment with the mathematics ccss3 10-14 formative assessment with the mathematics ccss
3 10-14 formative assessment with the mathematics ccssJeremy
 
Rubrics for Strategies 4 & 7
Rubrics for Strategies 4 & 7Rubrics for Strategies 4 & 7
Rubrics for Strategies 4 & 7Jeremy
 
Formative assessment with the mathematics ccss
Formative assessment with the mathematics ccssFormative assessment with the mathematics ccss
Formative assessment with the mathematics ccssJeremy
 
Strategies 23 and 6 drogos and beutjer revised
Strategies 23 and 6  drogos and beutjer revisedStrategies 23 and 6  drogos and beutjer revised
Strategies 23 and 6 drogos and beutjer revisedJeremy
 

More from Jeremy (20)

Formative seven june 2015
Formative seven june 2015Formative seven june 2015
Formative seven june 2015
 
Differentiated instruction.summer workshop.2015
Differentiated instruction.summer workshop.2015Differentiated instruction.summer workshop.2015
Differentiated instruction.summer workshop.2015
 
Literacy summer workshop 2015
Literacy summer workshop 2015Literacy summer workshop 2015
Literacy summer workshop 2015
 
How writing anchors literacy instruction
How writing anchors literacy instructionHow writing anchors literacy instruction
How writing anchors literacy instruction
 
How writing anchirs literacy instruction
How writing anchirs literacy instructionHow writing anchirs literacy instruction
How writing anchirs literacy instruction
 
Close Reading
Close ReadingClose Reading
Close Reading
 
Finalizing e us & eos
Finalizing e us & eosFinalizing e us & eos
Finalizing e us & eos
 
Selected Response Assessment
Selected Response AssessmentSelected Response Assessment
Selected Response Assessment
 
Performance Based Assessment
Performance  Based AssessmentPerformance  Based Assessment
Performance Based Assessment
 
Introducing the Common Core October 2 2014
Introducing the Common Core October 2 2014Introducing the Common Core October 2 2014
Introducing the Common Core October 2 2014
 
Operations in proofs review
Operations in proofs reviewOperations in proofs review
Operations in proofs review
 
Using DOK to Write Common Assessments
Using DOK to Write Common AssessmentsUsing DOK to Write Common Assessments
Using DOK to Write Common Assessments
 
Mastery Manager Training
Mastery Manager TrainingMastery Manager Training
Mastery Manager Training
 
Mastery manager training 1
Mastery manager training 1Mastery manager training 1
Mastery manager training 1
 
Follow up table talk march 18
Follow up table talk march 18Follow up table talk march 18
Follow up table talk march 18
 
Revised using rubrics to facilitate self-assessment and self-reflection
Revised  using rubrics to facilitate self-assessment and self-reflectionRevised  using rubrics to facilitate self-assessment and self-reflection
Revised using rubrics to facilitate self-assessment and self-reflection
 
3 10-14 formative assessment with the mathematics ccss
3 10-14 formative assessment with the mathematics ccss3 10-14 formative assessment with the mathematics ccss
3 10-14 formative assessment with the mathematics ccss
 
Rubrics for Strategies 4 & 7
Rubrics for Strategies 4 & 7Rubrics for Strategies 4 & 7
Rubrics for Strategies 4 & 7
 
Formative assessment with the mathematics ccss
Formative assessment with the mathematics ccssFormative assessment with the mathematics ccss
Formative assessment with the mathematics ccss
 
Strategies 23 and 6 drogos and beutjer revised
Strategies 23 and 6  drogos and beutjer revisedStrategies 23 and 6  drogos and beutjer revised
Strategies 23 and 6 drogos and beutjer revised
 

The link between di by readiness and intervention final

  • 2. Use GradeCam to assess the group of participants about their pop culture knowledge ▪ This would be a formative assessment given during a unit on Pop Culture based on the KUD below Know Understand Do celebrities in the Understand that comprehend and news UsWeekly is a valuable analyze articles to tool to acquire pop obtain pop culture culture knowledge in information order to stay current with celebrity culture. ▪ Based on correct responses, participants will be split up into 2 groups ▪ Us WEEKLY is used solely for modeling purposes
  • 3. Review the concepts of RtI  Understand the connection between Differentiated Instruction by Readiness and RtI  Analyze three examples of Intervening via Differentiation by Readiness
  • 4. We are not the Differentiation Team!  If you have any questions about differentiation or any of the differentiated lessons discussed today, please contact a member of the Differentiation Team.  Each department has a representative that is willing and able to answer your questions!
  • 5. Strategies  The combination of research-based methods or activities designed to teach the learning objective.  Interventions  Program, actions, or strategies specifically designed to address an identified deficiency and monitored to ensure outcome improvement . (Taken from LTHS PLC Glossary (p.7))
  • 6.  “Current knowledge, understanding, and skill level a student has related to a particular sequence of learning” (Tomlinson & Strickland 6).  Readiness is influenced by a student’s prior learning and life experiences, attitudes about school, and habits of mind (Tomlinson 3).  Goal of DI by Readiness:  “Make the work a little too difficult for students at a given point in their growth- and then to provide the support they need to succeed at a new level of challenge” (Tomlinson & Strickland 6).
  • 7. All groups MUST be challenged appropriately with quality level tasks.  ZPD—Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development  Scaffolding  All groups should be evaluated for their understanding of the learning objective (KUD).  Not an evaluation of the task students are completing, rather an evaluation of their UNDERSTANDING!
  • 8. Struggling learners need interventions to meet learning objectives (KUD)  DI by Readiness can be used to facilitate the delivery of an intervention to struggling students  Struggling learners make up the lowest level readiness group  Example activities for struggling learners include:  Mini-lectures/mini-lessons  Guided practice and instructions  Analysis of supplemental materials  Peer review and peer teaching
  • 9. When DI for Readiness is intentionally used and monitored to address students who are not reaching the learning objectives, it becomes an intervention.
  • 10. 1. Students who do not meet learning objectives are identified as “struggling learners”. 2. DI by Readiness lesson is planned and delivered ▪ Struggling learners are placed in the lowest-level group and receive an intervention as their quality level task/activity 3. Growth is monitored ▪ Formative and post-assessments are used to monitor growth ▪ Mid-quarter/quarter grades
  • 11. Pop culture activity Know Understand Do Celebrities in the Understand that Comprehend and news UsWeekly is a valuable analyze articles to tool to acquire pop obtain pop culture culture knowledge in information order to stay current with celebrity culture.  At your table you will find an activity to be completed based on your pop culture quiz results.  Read the directions and complete the activity with your table.  Post assessment would be given to low level group after the activity, the next day, or at a later time if the intervention is going to continue.
  • 12. Identification  Pop Culture quiz was used to determine grouping ▪ This would have been given as a formative assessment during a unit on pop culture  Intervention  Graphic organizer can be used in multiple ways to help students acquire information ▪ While one group received the intervention, the other worked on enrichment activity  Progress Monitoring  Post-assessment scores of low level group are used to monitor the growth of students
  • 13. Several teachers submitted their DI by Readiness lessons and explained how an intervention was able to take place during the lessons.  We will share with you examples from:  American Studies  Chemistry  Music
  • 14. Know: 1) How to integrate quotes in a response 2) Reasons O’Brien averted the draft and then returned – English 3) Reasons anyone would support the war and reasons they wouldn’t – History  Understand: Students will understand that some quotes work better than others to support an argument.  Do: 1) Write a summary about the draft properly integrating two key phrases as support (Prep). Write a summary of an article from Rolling Stone called “The Kill Team” while properly integrating two key phrases as support(Accel) 2) Write a persuasive paragraph that explains what they would do with regard to the draft and the Vietnam War while integrating textual support and historical content.
  • 15. Pre-assessment and Lesson  Pre-assessment given to determine readiness levels of students for initial activities ▪ Read non-fiction article and wrote 5 sentence summary integrating two quotes (handed in before the end of class) ▪ Based on written responses and the use of a rubric, students were broken up into groups the next day  Small groups worked on specific areas of writing based on pre- assessment  Identification  Students not making growth towards learning objectives, based on formative assessments, move on to an
  • 16. Intervention  Activities designed based on students’ areas of deficit with integrating quotes in a response ▪ These are activities different than the initial lesson ▪ Remember, the intervention is teaching the student in a different way, not just re-teaching the same lesson!  Teacher directed support given to struggling students to help students recognize and rectify the deficiency  Took place over a week with plenty of opportunity for students to practice writing and receive teacher instruction/feedback
  • 17. Progress Monitoring  Post-assessment was given to all students, with specific attention to struggling students’ growth  Students had 30 minutes in class to write a response integrating quotes  Rubric was used to determine the growth made based on comparison to initial rubric  Rubric score was used as a grade for students
  • 18. Know Understand Do Basic molar conversions The students will understand Group 1: Work on basic from g  mol and mol that % concentration is problems in order to g calculated using the equation reinforce concept of molarity Differentiate parts of a Mass of solute and % concentration solution (i.e. solute and Mass of solution *100 Group 2: Work on solvent) intermediate problems that Methods of making a stress molarity and % solution of known The students will understand concentration concentration that molarity is calculated Group 3: Apply knowledge using of molarity and % Mol of solute concentration in order to Liters of sol’n make a solution of known molarity and % concentration
  • 19. Pre-assessment and Lesson  Students were given an exit slip (pre-assessment) the day before the lesson took place ▪ Next day grouping-- Teacher tells students which group they are in by writing a 1, 2, or 3 on their exit slips ▪ 1.5 or less correct were placed in group 1 ▪ 2-3.5 correct were placed in group 2 ▪ all 4 correct were placed in group 3  Identification  Students not making growth towards learning objectives, based on formative assessments, move on to an intervention
  • 20. Intervention  Teacher directed instruction with struggling students in small group while moving around room to help other groups as needed ▪ Teacher directed (mini-lesson; Q &A) ▪ Step-by-step instructions ▪ Close eye on the students needing intervention
  • 21. Progress Monitoring  The post assessment was a lab, “Concentration of a Solution”  All students worked on the lab and were required to turn in their sheet showing the calculation of the molarity and percent concentration of the solution  Group 1’s scores were analyzed for progress made towards learning objectives
  • 22. Know:  Students will KNOW the grand staff, pitch letter names, the origin of staff notation, Guido of Arezzo, Medieval Era of Music.  Understand:  Students will UNDERSTAND how music is notated.  Do:  Students will (DO) identify all pitches on the grand staff.
  • 23. Identification:  Pre-assessment was given to determine readiness levels regarding students’ knowledge about note names on the grand staff  Pre-assessment data was used to develop tiered tasks to meet all levels of learners
  • 24. Intervention  Students not meeting the learning objectives were to work on Task 1 of the tiered task  Students were provided with teacher directed instruction in a small group
  • 25. Progress Monitoring  Post-assessment was given to all students, with specific attention to struggling students’ progress  The post-assessment was a final test used as a grade
  • 26. With these great lessons in mind, think of an upcoming unit that you anticipate having students that struggle with the material.  Talk with a partner about ways you could Differentiate by Readiness to intervene with the ‘struggling learners’.
  • 27. Teachers that provided DI by Readiness lessons:  Virginia Condon, Jennifer Setzke, Jessica Roessler, Ben Lafontaine (American Studies)  Jaime Bronuskas (Chemistry)  Alysia Lambert (Music)
  • 28. Concepts of RtI  Identify, plan and deliver intervention, progress monitor growth  Connection between DI by Readiness and RtI  DI by Readiness is a method for implementing interventions with struggling learners  Three GREAT examples were presented!
  • 29. Buffum, A., Mattos, M., & Weber, C. (2009). Pyramid response to intervention: RTI, professional learning communities, and how to respond when kids don’t learn. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press. Johnson, E., Smith, L., & Harris, M. (2009). How RTI works in secondary schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Tomlinson, C.A. & Strickland, C. A. (2005). Differentiation in practice: A resource guide for differentiating curriculum – Grades 9-12. ASCD: Alexandria, Virginia. (2012). LTHS professional learning communities glossary. LTHS: LaGrange, IL.
  • 30. Thank you for attending!!!

Editor's Notes

  1. As participantswalk in they will pick up a manila folder with the following contents: -CPDU form -Pre-quiz on pop culture and GradeCam sheet -Sample American Studies, Chemistry, and Music differentiated lessonsParticipants should begin the pre-assessment as soon as possible and hand in to presenters to quickly grade. On the top of the GradeCam sheet, do not write their score. Either write JT (Justin Timberlake) if they score 5 or higher or write BW (Barbara Walters) if they score 4 or less. Do not let the groups know which group is which.Explain the KUD from this slide and talk about the sensitivity of grouping students in a way that does not stigmatize students based on scores.
  2. Review the objectives with the participants. Explain that we are going to focus on DI by Readiness and Intervention, not DI by Interest or Learning Profile since those types of DI do not lead to classroom interventions.
  3. You are members of the RtI Team, not the DI Team. If participants have questions that you are unable to answer, direct them to the DI Team members in their departments. We do not want to give out any incorrect information about DI.
  4. This is just a review from the February Planning Period PD session. Focus on the difference between the two being that interventions are deliberately chosen for a student based on an identified deficiency and that the student’s progress is monitored.
  5. Based on the Differentiation Team’s training, this is the information that the entire staff has already seen. The focus here is on Readiness.
  6. Based on Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development, teachers need to meet students where they are and provide scaffolded instruction for students to make gains. -Goldilocks and 3 Bears is a great example! Too hot/too cold is the same as too hard/too easy…students need it just right!Students are not evaluated on the tasks they complete during the lesson, but instead on their overall understanding. The Do leads to the Understanding which is evaluated during the post-assessment.
  7. DI by Readiness is NOT an intervention in and of itself. It is what you do with the group that is struggling that is the intervention if and only if it is monitored!Example activities notes: -all activities listed can be done using small group instruction
  8. Once you identify the students not meeting learning objectives, the low-level group of differentiation by readiness will begin an intervention based on objectives not met.
  9. Point out the fact that all activities are aimed at teaching the KUD- the enrichment activity will enhance the understanding of the non-struggling students. Both groups receive a quality task.Teachers provide instruction, identify areas of weakness of students and teacher then adapts the instruction, not just restates the instruction.The pre-assessment is a check-in based on current unit/topic.
  10. In all examples, teachers followed the steps necessary for differentiation by readiness and intervention.DI by Readiness: 1) Teacher must give pre-assessment to determine readiness levels 2) Create meaningful tasks for all readiness levels 3) Teach using best-practice instructionIntervention: 1) Identification of students not meeting learning objectives (formative assessments) 2) Determine research-based intervention for identified students 3) Progress monitor the growth towards the learning objectiveIn all examples, if students do not meet learning objectives after initial intervention, a second intervention would be necessary for those very few students. All students should be able to meet learning objectives (Enduring Understandings).
  11. American Studies is a Junior Level class that combines US History and English III. Students were reading The Things They Carried by Tim O’Brien, learning about the Vietnam War, and studying how to effectively use quotes to support an argument.The K and U stayed the same for all students, but the D changed based on Prep or Accel students
  12. Teacher directed instruction in lowest group while other 3 groups continued to improve. One-to-one instruction with approximately 3 students per class.
  13. During week of intervention, low level students worked one-to-one with teacher and/or went through a peer edit with student from higher groups.
  14. After post-assessment was graded, teacher continued to give shorter writing assignments to lower level students to continue progress monitor.Strengths: All students made gains, including the 3 in each class that struggled and went through the intervention.
  15. K and U are the same for all studentsIn this example the D has been altered to challenge each group appropriatelyAll three groups MUST have quality tasks
  16. Students were given the exit slip the day before the activity took place.  I graded it looking for the correct answer to each question.  Students who got 1.5 or less were placed in group 1, students who got 2-3.5 were placed in group 2 and students who got all 4 correct were placed in group 3.  Since group 3 was actually working in the lab on the solution, I wanted to make sure they could do the calculations.  In a class of 23 it worked out to 8 in group 1, 8 in group 3 and 7 in group 2.  I put a one two or three on top of their paper, to signify what group each student was in.   Based on formative assessments, students were allowed to move down in group if necessary. I ended up with more students in group 1.
  17. Teacher has set expectations that at different points in the year students will be in different groups. Also, students know that when working in small groups they are expected to respect all groups and work on their assigned tasks.Teacher must set up the culture that small group work will be done in the class and students are expected to act appropriately and complete their assigned work.