Articles of Confederation Essay: Weaknesses and Achievements

The Articles of Confederation Essay examples
The Continental Congress between the years of 1776 and 1777 decided that the way of living was not suitable. After all had decided they drafted
together, what we call The Articles of Confederation; "the document that defined the colonies' collective sovereignty; drafted by the Continental
Congress between 1776 and 1777, then ratified by the thirteen states in 1781"(Schultz 115). There was experimentation that was being done in the
states that didn't affect The Articles of Confederation. There wasn't much change, as it was about the same from the late 1770s. The Articles provided
each state their independence and granting very minimal power to the main federal government.
Under the Articles of Confederation, there were powers strictly...show more content...
There were two main achievements, " (I) the Articles established the United States as a government of law that placed limited on governments
authority, and (2) the Articles created a national citizenship, which gave equal rights to qualifying members. There would be no titles or
codification of classes in America" (Schultz 116). However, there were three main weaknesses that stood out. First, the inability to raise funds
because the new nation was badly in debt and taxes couldn't be levied because of the Articles of Confederation. This then made it hard to find a
creditor, which then made it an immediate disaster and leaded to trouble for the new nation. Second, the need for unanimity to make changes was
one of the weaknesses under the Articles. In 1781, a nation bank was asked to help the national debt and facilitate credit. Because of this, a system
of reserves was created by the capitol. This then put a 5 percent tax on all imported goods. Each state had to approve of these happenings under the
Articles of Confederation, unfortunately Rhode Island didn't agree on this taxation. This then forced the bill to die, and the plans were unable to be
cleared. The last weakness of the Articles was the lack of authority over international trade. The commerce between states suffered because there was
no centralized authority. Each state had its own form of currency and taxes it was hard to trade goods over their state
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

The Articles of Confederation Essay
The Articles of Confederation
In the 1770's, as America's great thinkers and writers were declaring their desire for independence; they also established a committee to lay the
foundation for the American form of government. These brilliant writers and philosophers hesitantly began designing the national level of government
for use in America and named their final draft the Articles of Confederation . Out of their utter distrust of a centralized government, due to their
association with the English monarchial system, the drafters deliberately established these articles as a loose confederation of states, rather than a
firmly united nation. Life under the Articles of Confederation was filled with hardships and uncertainty, and the...show more content...
Furthermore, they institutionalized systems of local government, and public education . Moreover, while accomplishing all this, the congress managed
to keep the national economy afloat. This proved to be an enormous feat because the economy was suffering from the loss of colonial privileges. These
major achievements were all accomplished despite the inherent flaws in the basic structure of the Confederation government.
The Articles of Confederation created a unicameral Confederation Congress, with each state having only one vote. On most political matters this
legislative body required the approval of 9 out of 13 states to ratify any proposed Congressional intention. In Article 13, the Articles declared that in
order to ratify an amendment to the Articles the consent of all 13 states were required . This left the national government, running through the
Confederation Congress, powerless and unable to proceed with the most trivial matters of politics. The Confederation Government, under the Articles,
lacked an executive and judicial branch. This caused Congress to be severely handicapped when it came to the enforcement of her requests. This lack
of an executive, coupled with the Congress's negated power of taxation, caused a crippling financial difficulties. The Congress, having only enough
power to request essential national funds

Articles of Confederation vs Constitution
Mallory Pineda
AE 1
The Articles of Confederation and United States Constitution are two documents that shaped the U.S. government into what it is today. The Articles of
Confederation (AOC) was the first Constitution of the United States. Americans soon realized that this document had to be substantially modified
because the U.S. needed a stronger government. The AOC was thought of as an ineffective national government document, although there were some
strong points. The AOC was ratified in 1781, and replaced by an improved document known as the United States Constitution in 1789. An unknown
person once said, "Perhaps the greatest service rendered by the Articles of Confederation was the impetus its shortcomings gave to those who...show
more content...
This plan also called for the lower house to be elected directly by the people and the upper house to be elected by the lower house. This plan as well
called for a Chief Executive and a Federal Court system, and it gave Congress the power to tax and regulate interstate commerce. The Large State Plan
gave the national government the power to legislate, and gave a proposed national Council of Revision a veto power over state legislatures. The
delegates loved the sound of this fundamental reform plan.
The Virginia Plan struck opposition among delegates from the smaller states and thus a competing plan, presented by William Patterson, known as
the New Jersey Plan, or Small State Plan, came into action. This plan kept federal powers rather limited and created no new Congress. Instead, the
plan enlarged some of the supremacies then held by the Continental Congress. It also called for a plural executive branch and a federal court system
like the Virginia Plan. This plan was not as highly sought out as the Virginia Plan, so in turn was rejected which caused the supporters of the Virginia
Plan to make amends to the smaller states. This in turn resulted in members of the Senate being elected by the state legislatures.
After the Virginia and New Jersey Plan delegates worked out a series of compromises between these competing

Articles Of Confederation Essay
A foundation is one that is strong, ever– present, non budging, and base for all that comes after it. If the foundation is weak and not built with the
additional layers in mind, it will collapse. Only a strong base that was built with intentions of lasting for the future will remain in tact. In terms of
government and civilization, there is a base that is able to be traced directly to the origin. This base holds everything that the leaders and people
carry out in today's functioning society. A foundation that is able to adapt and adjust to different situations and groups of people is what truly lasts
and does not collapse. Before a new and improved model is created, there must be a predecessor. This is a guide that is usually followed...show more
content...
Under the Articles of Confederation, there was a relationship where the states held greater influence over decisions and outcomes more than
Congress had. This was due to few powers being given up to Congress during the forming of the Articles. States had the power to tax and distribute
money to Congress if they were asked. The states would determine if they would approve or disapprove and many times, it would be the latter of the
options. During the Articles era, there was no president or a national court. This meant that the individual who was head of the Congress had no real
power, although of his title and position in meetings and decision processes. The powers of the national legislature was also strictly limited. In order for
Congress to have something passed, all thirteen states had to vote in approval for said proposal. Only the state acted on the people forthrightly and
Congress was unable to get involved with trade and the hindered potential foreign trade to boost the economy (Comparison of Constitution and Articles
of Confederation). All important matters and powers ended up with the states in the hopes of not allowing a strong central government. After enacting
the Constitution power shifted from the states to establish a stronger central

Unit 1: Week 1– Blended Discussion Thread Week 1 Problems of the Articles of Confederation Identify at least 2 problems with the Articles of the
Confederation. Discuss why these were issues and how were they resolved. If the Articles of the Confederation were drawn up today, what issues
would be brought forth? Identify and discuss at least 1 of the issues. Respond to at least 1 student post. The biggest problem of the articles of the
Federatation it gave States more rights that what it gave to the Federal Government. The country was very leery at the time of having a very strong
central government, the feared it would be just like when they were controlled by the King of England. The central government couldn't collect any
taxes; they could get money if the states donated it to them, so it made it impossible for them to be able to print up money, and also to build up the
countries military. The government borrowed a lot of money to fund the Revolutionary War, and need to pay investors and other countries back, and
with no tax money coming in it was impossible. The Constitution helped by dividing up different branches of the government so one part of the
government did not have complete power. There were checks and balances. The constitution created a federal system where...show more content...
There needs to be away for there to be a way for there to be checks and balances, so things are done the right way. I also feel today it would be
brought up that you have to be able to collect taxes; we have countries and terror groups around the world that would like nothing better than to attack
a country that doesn't have a strong military. I don't really like to see our country go to war, because of the innocent lives that are lost. There needs to
be a way to defend ourselves

Articles Of Confederation Issue Analysis
After the Revolutionary war, the 13 colonies needed a government and they approved The Articles of Confederation which was the first federal
government that was approved by Congress in 1777 in Philadelphia and was formally ratified and put in effect in 1781 (Keene, Cornell, & O'Donnell,
2013). The issues that the raised from the Articles of Confederation was the distribution of power, instead of giving too much power to central
government like Britain, the founders decided to place the sovereign power on the hands of the states. Also, they did not have national court system to
impose laws that were approved by government, and did not have a President.
Another problem of the government was economic disorganization, since there were no taxation,

Essay about Articles of Confederation
The Preamble of the Constitution of the United States of America classifies an effective government as one that "establish[s] justice, insure[s] domestic
tranquility, provide[s] for the common defense, promote[s] the general welfare, and secure[s] the blessings of liberty." Based on these standards, the
Articles of Confederation were effective to a certain degree at the time, but in the end, were too liberal to be effective. Because its main purpose was
to ensure the blessings of liberty, the Articles of Confederation had to sacrifice stability and security, which ultimately led to its downfall.
The Articles of Confederation promoted the spirit and beliefs of liberty and equality. It provided for a loose confederation, which gave...show more
content...
The sixteenth section of each township was to be sold for the benefit of the public schools. This law, which secured the future education of the citizens
of the forthcoming states of the Old Northwest, is a good example of how the government under the Articles of Confederation promoted the general
welfare. The Northwest Ordinance of 1787, which related to the governing of the Old Northwest, came to grips with the problem of how a nation
should deal with its colonial peoples. The solution afforded by the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 was a compromise: momentary subordination then
permanent equality. The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 preserved the spirit of equality. This law granted that when sixty thousand people inhabited a
territory, it would be admitted by Congress as a state, "with all the privileges of the thirteen charter members" (American Pageant, 174). Instead of
keeping these new territories in permanent subordination, it promised equality in the future. Because its main goal was to preserve freedom and
equality, the Articles of Confederation proved to be an effective government for the people of that era, who were trite of monarchies and dictatorships.
In order to limit the power of the federal government, the Articles of Confederation created one without sufficient power to manage effectively,

Conclusion Of The Articles Of Confederation
In 1781, while the countries were still independent, the first constitution, the Articles of
Confederation, was made officially valid. From this the Congress of Confederation was formed, where there was a single legislature and no president
or judicial branch. Though these powers were very limited Congress, with the forming of the Articles of Confederation, now held the power to manage
wars and govern foreign affairs.
In 1786 a Constitution convention was called by Alexander Hamilton to discuss the need for a stronger central government in America to remain stable.
After the Confederation
Congress endorsed the idea of a stronger government in 1787, an invite was sent to all thirteen states to send delegates to a meeting held in Philadelphia
to discuss the matter of a stronger government. There fifty five delegates attended, representing all thirteen states except
Rhode Island for they did not agree with the idea. After this, Congress gave the delegates the task of amending the Articles of Confederation. After
trying to figure out the many different proposals, they began to deliberate proposals for a whole new form of government.
Throughout the summer of 1787 intense debates went on threatening to throw off the proceedings, but in the end a plan was developed establishing
three branches of national government– executive, legislative and judicial. With this, checks and balances were put in place and specific powers and
responsibilities were distributed. Out of all the delegates that attended James Madison was the only one who attended every meeting taking note of the
debates and discussions. His journal in which he kept these notes were secret until after his death. In 1837 his journal and several other papers of his
were bought by the government for
30,000 dollars. It was not until 1840 when it was published. The final text of the Constitution was drafted in September of 1787 by the Convention's
five member Committee of Style, consisting of Alexander Hamilton, James, William Samuel
Johnson, Governor Morris, and Rufus King. On September 17, thirty nine of the fifty three delegates signed the final text of the Constitution, the first
being George Washington.
A series of essays

Essay on The Articles of Confederation
With the United States new found independence from Great Britain, its founding fathers realize from their historical experiences that a document of
law needed to be crafted and established to preserve its new found independence, while maintaining order. However, the first document crafted by the
founding fathers, the Articles of Confederation, did preserve the country new found independence but it did not maintain order. The Articles of
Confederation described by many founding fathers to be a document that was crafted to satisfy needs of every state for its ratification, even when the
document did not present a responsible democracy. The Articles of Confederation granted all national powers to the congress; however, it allowed each
state...show more content...
However, an uprising led by Revolutionary War captain Daniel Shays that took place in western Massachusetts in 1786 was the event that got the
attention of the founding fathers. The Shay's Rebellion demonstrated to the founding fathers that the Articles of Confederation brought commercial
problems, threaten civil order, and conflicts between states. Likewise, at the constitutional convention the founding fathers crafted and ratified the U.S
constitution to address the problem the Articles of Confederation could not tackle. Unlike the Articles of Confederation, the divided the powers of the
national government into three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial. Furthermore, the constitution established a one true currency system and
presented the job duties and requirements the three branches and individual states. Unlike the Articles of Confederation, the constitution presented the
rights of its people (Bill of Rights) and a system of check of balance and separation of powers that the United States as democratic country. The Articles
of Confederation was a popular democracy with its chaotic results and the constitution was a responsible democracy with its civilized outcomes.
James Madison, a founding father and the fourth president believed that with the corrupted nature of humans, a government is vital to prevent
oppression. The

Articles Of Confederation Vs Constitution Essay
Following the creation of the United States of America, a constitution of laws was desperately needed to create firm unity in the young nation. The
original constitution that the Congress brought forth was the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation left most of the power with the
state governments, which many people approved of. However, many problems were created by this law of the land. A convention was called in
Philadelphia in 1787 to revise the Articles where they eventually scrapped it and wrote a new, but similar in ideals, document which is now known as
the U.S. Constitution. The Constitution was, in fact, very different from the Articles of Confederation. So much so that they do not even appear to be
similar in any...show more content...
For instance, they were both written with the same intentions of creating new country of freedom for many people. It also contains the same ideals of
government that the Articles had, just in a different format. Also, both central governments had the right to raise an army and build up a navy.
However, this seems to be where more differences start to appear. One glaring difference between the two is that the Articles made the states seem like
a friendly cooperation while the Constitution firmly defined the unity of the states. Also, the Constitution resolved the problems that the central
government had when referring to levying taxes and controlling trade. Another importance between the two is the number of Congress votes each state
had. During the time of the Articles of Confederation, there was only one congressional vote per state. On the other hand, after the Constitution was put
in place, each state had one vote per delegate elected into Congress. On a final note, while many of the ideals behind the Articles of Confederation and
the U.S. Constitution were the same, the two documents were different in many ways and created two very distinct forms of

The United States left the Articles of Confederation behind for a new more adapted constitution in 1788 due to more than one reason, however a
main reason for the switch had to do with the power of the federal government. There would be some Libertarians that would hold the Articles to be
the symbol of American freedom at its peak, however there were those that would later be known as Federalists that saw the Articles as a failure due to
the lack of strong central government powers within the articles. The many differences between the two documents were each important in there own
respect, the first one that come to mind would be the power to levy taxes, under the articles Congress could request that States pay taxes, but under the
...show more content...
Though the articles did account for a President, he did hardly more than preside over the Congress, there was no power in the Presidency. The
Constitution on the other hand gave power to the executive branch headed by the President to choose the Cabinet and be another check to the
judiciary and legislature. The Amending document was changed as well between the two, before 13 out of 13 colonies were needed to amend an
article, while later 2/3 of both houses of Congress as well as Вѕ of State legislature or National Convention were needed. The representation of the
States was drastically changed, under the articles each State received one vote regardless of size, in the Constitution the upper house (Senate) has two
votes from each state and the lower house would be based upon population. A major change in the documents would be the power to raise an army,
previously Congress could not draft troops, they were dependent upon the states to contribute forces, and however in the new system Congress could
raise an army for military situations. There was also interstate commerce, which could be controlled by congress in the Constitution, and alike, disputes
between states could now be dealt with by the federal Court system instead of a complicated system of Arbitration. Passing laws was yet another point
of change, where only 9/13 votes were needed to approve legislation before, the Constitution needed

From 1781 to 1789 the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an ineffective government, however there were some strong steps
taken in the articles to try and make the United States a better country. The articles created a loose confederation of independent states that gave limited
powers to a central government, known as Congress. Some actions taken by Congress, such as the Treaty of Paris, and certain powers that were given to
them were sometimes beneficial to the United States. Nevertheless, in attempting to limit the power of the central government, the Second Continental
Congress created one without sufficient power to govern effectively, which led to serious national and international problems. The greatest...show more
content...
However, the most important power was that Congress had the right to obtain territory and control development of the western territories, which was
previously controlled by their mother country, Great Britain. (Doc D) With theArticles of Confederation, the United States was able to break away
from their mother country and become a free nation, setting up their own government. Although the articles set the United States free, it was unable to
provide them with a solid government. Leaders like John Jay and James Madison criticized the Articles of Confederation because of the weak
government. (Doc G) There were several problems between the states and the central government. For instance, sometimes the states refused to give the
government the money it needed, and they engaged in tariff wars with one another, bringing interstate trading to a halt. The government could not pay
off the debts it had incurred during the revolution, including paying soldiers who had fought in the war and citizens who had provided supplies to the
cause. (Doc C) In addition, the new nation was unable to defend its borders from British and Spanish encroachment because it could not pay for an
army when the states would not contribute the necessary funds. Another serious problem was that Congress could not pass needed measures because
they lacked nine–state majority required to become laws. The states

Essay On Articles Of Confederation
For the past decade, we have been living under the government of the Articles of Confederation, if that can be called a government at all. Under that
folly of a constitution, we have barely existed, Congress weaker than a mewling baby. We are named the United States of America, but under the
Articles of Confederation, we are nothing more than the squabbling states somewhat nearby each other. We could get nothing done under the Articles.
Each state has a veto power, and each state has an agenda. This means that any legislation a state disgrees with will not pass. In a decade, we have
accomplished little beyond settling the western matter, our Congress and national government ineffectual and broke. The states have too much power,
conducting...show more content...
Even under the amended Articles of Confederation, we have little power to run our country. We have nothing if not our people and our pride, and we
are losing both. The people of this nation are losing their faith in the Articles and this government, and for good reason. We have failed to govern. The
Constitution promises that we can both ensure the safety and the liberties of our people. It is an agreement between the nation and the states– between
the nation and our society. Federalism is the idea of sharing power, which all will do so willingly. The farmers of our nation have declared the
Articles a tyranny, going so far as acting in rebellion against it. It is our job to listen to these rebellions and defiances, for that was how began our
own country. Under the Constitution, here shall be no tyranny, for what tyrant can there be when power is shared? All three branches of the
government will work together to reign the nation and reign each other. The Constitution is our utopian idea of a new, indelible government, one
where all work from all levels to protect and serve. Those of us who hold power in this government wil be fallible and imperfect, subject to our faults
and agencies, but the Constitution shall remain there always, to uphold our ideals and to shield those under our care from war and famine, and from
our government

Essay The Articles of Confederation
The articles of Confederation were the first attempt at a federal government for the United States. They only lasted for about seven years (1781– 1788)
until they were they were thrown out and replaced by the Constitution As a whole, they did not lay out a very strong or effective central government.
Some positive things were accomplished, but the biggest accomplishment of the Articles was that they pointed put what would not work for the United
States and they paved a was for the writing of the Constitution. The Articles of Confederation started out as a radical plan for a strong central
government written by John Dickinson in 1776. By the time there were approved by Congress, the Articles were an extremely watered–down...show
more content...
This way, one single state would not have such heavy influence over all of the other states. In 1786, there was a major even that made people question
the Articles of Confederation. In rural, western Massachusettes, there was a violent uprising of unhappy farmers led by Daniel Shays. They were upset
because of high taxes and they complained that the Massachusetts state government did not really care about them. Although the federal government
had the power to raise an army to stop the thousands of farmers led by Shays, because they could not tax, they lacked sufficient funds, After Shays's
Rebellion, George Washington commented to James Madison that outbreaks such as Shays's would pull state governments apart and eventually all of
the state governments would crumble without the support of a strong federalist central government. Eight years after Shays's Rebellion, there was a
similar rebellion in western Pennsylvania. In 1794, a group of farmers, angry because of unfair taxes on distilled whiskey, rallied together and became a
violent threat. This time, with the Constitution in place, President Washington was able to call together a militia to disband the angry group of farmers.
This shows tat under the Articles and the Constitution, similar problems arose, but the government under the Constitution was much better suited to
deal with them than the government under the Articles. Although there were clearly some shortcomings of the

The Articles Of Confederation Essay
This document was written in the 18th century specifically during the Federalist Era. It was written 18 years after America won independence from
England on July 4, 1776. This lead to the creation of the "Articles of Confederation" which were made primarily for the people because they feared
central government having all power. Then at The Annapolis Convention (1786) is where the groundworks of "The U.S. Constitution" were discussed
to replace the "Articles of Confederation".
The following year the Constitution was composed on September 17, 1787. The idea of the constitution was seen as ownership papers for citizens. The
constitution provided the "checks–and–balances" idea which limited powers between the three branches created: Congress, Supreme Court, and
Executive. As well as provided a "Bill of Rights", which James Madison promised to the people in order to get the Constitution ratified. The executive
branch lead to the position of a President and for the President to make appointments and treaties.
So as a result of the powers of the Executive branch, it lead to the Election of 1788 and 1792 where the Commander–in–chief– was elected
unanimously by the Electoral College in both elections. Since the President felt uneducated, he created Presidential Cabinet to help surround himself
with expert advisors. One appointment position primarily important to this document, was given to Alexander Hamilton of Secretary of the Treasury.
Due to taxes made by Hamilton, it created a

Articles Of Confederation Constitution Essay
Name
Instructor
Course
Date
Articles of Confederation and the Constitution
The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution provided various powers for the government and state. The government had power to make war and
diplomatic deals. The Northern ordinance was manifest of the power granted to the government. The government also had the power to impose taxes
upon various agencies within its jurisdiction. Initially congress had no power to implement the provision of the articles. The state had no power of
imposing taxes to businesses and other agencies. The articles also gave the national government the power to control commerce. This aimed to
eliminate wars fought because of scramble for regulation of commerce within the nation.
The powers...show more content...
The national government has power to petition the states to pay taxes. The states do not have the power to regulate interstate trade. Ginsbery asserts
that the national government has a federal court system to resolve court related issues (34). The states have the power to apportion taxes as per the
population statistics. Each state has a single vote. The national government deserves the right to dispose land parcels in the western part of the nation.
Congress also had the power to establish different post offices. This function led to the efficient management of the information communication system
in both the states and the central

Articles Of Confederation
The Articles of Confederation was the formal charter of the government of the United States that was the first binding document outlining its
independence from Great Britain. As tensions grew between the United States and Great Britain, a war was inevitable with the people of America
growing tired of the British rule and wanting independence, the Revolutionary War was the next step in trying to free itself from British tyranny. The
Articles of Confederation was fully ratified in 1781 after the Revolutionary War and seemed to be more interested in stability rather than liberty. The
Articles of Confederation was the first document outlining a national government that wrote into law the unplanned arrangements of the continental
congress and was...show more content...
Those powers included, congress having the right to levy taxes, congress having the right to regulate trade between states, Congress can now raise an
army to deal with military situations that they were under the Articles not able to deal with, federal court systems to handle disputes with citizens as
well as state issues. The Constitution was also different from the Articles by have having a two house system set up instead of the one house as before,
which included the upper house (senate) and lower house (H.O.R.) and the amount of representatives in each state was dependent upon the population
of said

Essay On The Articles Of Confederation
The Articles of Confederation already gave power to the Congress. The power was not being forced upon the people of Colonial America. I would
want for the government to have the power to protect our rights and freedom. The people have the right idea by having the government ran by them,
the people. Even though you still need government officials to be operating the government to give people a better life. A better life with free health
care, and equal pay for labor. To do this you would need to spend money. The people did not want to pay the government for they believed, the way
Britain did, about John Locke's Social Contract theory. "...to secure these rights [Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness], Governments are instituted
among men,...show more content...
You don't have the government being ran by the Church such as England was during Colonial America. In addition, the government would not be
an oligarchy such as Russia as of the time. The national government should have the right to raise taxes, and to regulate trade for that would benefit
those who are suffering. Have the power to build schools, and to make roads/railroads across the country. The government should have the power to
invest in exploration and expanding the size of our country. Everyone should be taken as equal, and the three/fifth compact should be out of
government. Freedom of press, religion, and the rights to bear arms should be uphold by the government. Not one person should have to fight for
their rights again. Government shall not have the power to suppress the population in a free market of goods and trade. A government being
controlled by the states, and the people is what it should be. Laws have to be voted by the people to make them a federal law. It would be a
dictatorship if you have a government that could create laws without the people's consent. Government ran by an executive leader who does not have
as much power as the king or queen of England.

Articles of confederation Essay
Articles of Confederation vs. Constitution      The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, although vastly
different in their philosophies of governing the nation, both played a big role in setting the stage for America's economy in the upcoming nineteenth
century. A few years after the Articles of Confederation were drafted many politicians and economists, such as Alexander Hamilton, began to see
problems with the decentralized form of government that was created by this document. These advocates of a more centralized government were
referred to as federalists, and although they were not in favor of a dictatorship, like that of England's, they saw the need for a central governing system
to reside over...show more content...
They though that the economic problems of the time were a consequence of excess spending on behalf of the consumer, and had nothing to do with the
government. The anti–federalists believed that the federal system places the economic, and political, responsibilities of the nation in the hands of a
select few. In their opinion, the proposed constitution did little more than facilitate an oppressive government, and in essence cause America to take a
giant step backwards, towards the oppressive dictatorship they had fought so fiercely to escape.      The Articles of
Confederation was created as a result of a young nations' distrust for a powerful centralized government, and because of this distrust the anti–federalists
were blinded to the problems that arose under this document. Shay's Rebellion exemplified the manifestation of the problems of the Article of
Confederation. The decentralized government was unable to provide a stable currency that was backed by gold securities, and as a result of this the
paper money that was issued was extremely weak and under valued. Problems such as this violent mob of farmers, clearly indicated that the current
system was failing and the need for a centralized government was great.      Both of

Articles of Confederation Essay: Weaknesses and Achievements

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Articles of Confederation Essay: Weaknesses and Achievements