Can my employer fire me for no reason?
an “at-will” employment state. This means that in most cases, your employer can fire you at any time for any reason, for a bad reason, or for no reason at all. So your employer can fire you for complaining about your boss’s lack of
Can my employer retaliate against me?
Generally, yes. Most retaliation is not illegal. You should contact Heins & Minko Employment Attorneys to find out if you case has merit.
Are there exceptions to employment at-will?
employment contract, it may contain language that says your employer can only fire you “for cause” (i.e., a good reason). Additionally, if your employer made an oral or written statement (including pre-employment statements) that tends to limit its ...
Am I eligible for unemployment if my employer fired me for a bad reason or no reason?
Yes. Even if your situation does not fall into one of the exceptions of employment at will listed here, you may still be eligible for unemployment benefits if your employer did not terminate you for misconduct.
What is illegal discrimination?
Discrimination is treating someone differently based on his/her membership in a “protected class.” Protected classes include race, color, creed, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, physical or mental disability, receipt of public assistance, and age. ...
What is illegal harassment?
(see the preceding paragraph for a list of protected classes) that creates a hostile environment or adversely affects the individual’s employment. Most harassment claims are for sexual harassment. While morally wrong, harassment is not legally wrong unless the reason you are ...
Can I take medical or parental leave?
State and federal laws require some employers to provide eligible employees with leave for the birth, adoption, or foster care of a child, and to care for a serious health condition of the employee or his/her close relative. Eligible employees may sue for damages if their employer denies or ...
Is my employer required to accommodate my disability?
Employers must reasonably accommodate a qualified employee’s disability, unless the accommodation imposes an undue hardship on the employer.
Act 10 continues to cause controversy in Wisconsin
the law unconstitutional in Sept. 2012 and a stay was put on enforcing
Prison guard union vote allowed by state
On behalf of Heins Law Office LLC posted in Employment Disputes on Thursday, May 30, 2013.
President Obama praises Gap for raising wages
behalf of Heins & Minko posted in Employment Disputes on Friday, February 28, 2014. Wisconsin residents may be interested in recent comments by President Obama on a newly announced plan by Gap Inc. to raise its minimum wage. On Feb. 19, President Obama praised the ...
Wisconsin equal rights claim results in settlement
attorney who has
Can my employer fire me for no reason?
an “at-will” employment state. This means that in most cases, your employer can fire you at any time for any reason, for a bad reason, or for no reason at all. So your employer can fire you for complaining about your boss’s lack of
Can my employer retaliate against me?
Generally, yes. Most retaliation is not illegal. You should contact Heins & Minko Employment Attorneys to find out if you case has merit.
Are there exceptions to employment at-will?
employment contract, it may contain language that says your employer can only fire you “for cause” (i.e., a good reason). Additionally, if your employer made an oral or written statement (including pre-employment statements) that tends to limit its ...
Am I eligible for unemployment if my employer fired me for a bad reason or no reason?
Yes. Even if your situation does not fall into one of the exceptions of employment at will listed here, you may still be eligible for unemployment benefits if your employer did not terminate you for misconduct.
What is illegal discrimination?
Discrimination is treating someone differently based on his/her membership in a “protected class.” Protected classes include race, color, creed, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, physical or mental disability, receipt of public assistance, and age. ...
What is illegal harassment?
(see the preceding paragraph for a list of protected classes) that creates a hostile environment or adversely affects the individual’s employment. Most harassment claims are for sexual harassment. While morally wrong, harassment is not legally wrong unless the reason you are ...
Can I take medical or parental leave?
State and federal laws require some employers to provide eligible employees with leave for the birth, adoption, or foster care of a child, and to care for a serious health condition of the employee or his/her close relative. Eligible employees may sue for damages if their employer denies or ...
Is my employer required to accommodate my disability?
Employers must reasonably accommodate a qualified employee’s disability, unless the accommodation imposes an undue hardship on the employer.
Act 10 continues to cause controversy in Wisconsin
the law unconstitutional in Sept. 2012 and a stay was put on enforcing
Prison guard union vote allowed by state
On behalf of Heins Law Office LLC posted in Employment Disputes on Thursday, May 30, 2013.
President Obama praises Gap for raising wages
behalf of Heins & Minko posted in Employment Disputes on Friday, February 28, 2014. Wisconsin residents may be interested in recent comments by President Obama on a newly announced plan by Gap Inc. to raise its minimum wage. On Feb. 19, President Obama praised the ...
Wisconsin equal rights claim results in settlement
attorney who has
Paper regarding the duty to defend under an insurance policy, presented in April 2008 at Lorman Education Services seminar, Update on Insurance Issues in Texas
In today’s litigation and regulatory climate, class actions alleging statutory violations can pose some of the most persistent and troublesome threats to lenders...
Seminar Handout for Construction Defect Litigation: from A to Z Bailey and Wyant PLLC
Construction Defect Litigation: from A to Z seminar covers issues of commercial general liability insurance coverage, duties of defense, indemnity, insurance debates, surety bonds, wrap insurance options and class action suits.
Effects on Securities Arbitration of Dodd Frank and Supreme Court CasesStephen Ware
This presentation discusses the effects on securities arbitration of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Supreme Court cases including Rent-A-Center v. Jackson and Stolt-Nielsen v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Corp.
The "Follow-the-Fortunes" Doctrine in Reinsurance Litigationrfredmond
Overview of the "Follow-the-Fortunes" Doctrine as applied by courts to disputes between insurers and reinsurers, particularly in the Mass Tort Context
Paper regarding the duty to defend under an insurance policy, presented in April 2008 at Lorman Education Services seminar, Update on Insurance Issues in Texas
In today’s litigation and regulatory climate, class actions alleging statutory violations can pose some of the most persistent and troublesome threats to lenders...
Seminar Handout for Construction Defect Litigation: from A to Z Bailey and Wyant PLLC
Construction Defect Litigation: from A to Z seminar covers issues of commercial general liability insurance coverage, duties of defense, indemnity, insurance debates, surety bonds, wrap insurance options and class action suits.
Effects on Securities Arbitration of Dodd Frank and Supreme Court CasesStephen Ware
This presentation discusses the effects on securities arbitration of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Supreme Court cases including Rent-A-Center v. Jackson and Stolt-Nielsen v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Corp.
The "Follow-the-Fortunes" Doctrine in Reinsurance Litigationrfredmond
Overview of the "Follow-the-Fortunes" Doctrine as applied by courts to disputes between insurers and reinsurers, particularly in the Mass Tort Context
Contractual Provisions: What Do They Really Mean and How Can They Work for You?BoyarMiller
Andrew Pearce and David Stockel, shareholders in BoyarMiller’s litigation group, discussed what you need to know around contractual provisions – interpretation and legal support behind forum/venue selection clauses, merger clauses, arbitration provisions, prevailing party clauses, jury waivers, and others.
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
1. 2014 Texas Indemnity
Law Update
Presented by James W. Bartlett, Jr.
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
2. Purpose of an
Indemnity Provision
Promise to safeguard or hold a party harmless against
existing and/or future loss liability
In some circumstances, such as an agreement to indemnify
a party for its own negligence, courts see this as an
“extraordinary” shifting of risk
Nevertheless, Texas courts generally enforce an
unambiguous indemnity provision except where the
provision:
Violates the constitution or a statute; or
Violates public policy
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
3. Common Forms of
Indemnity in Texas
Contractual indemnity (most common)
Statutes affecting indemnity (less common)
Common law indemnity (rare)
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
4. Contractual Indemnity:
Tenants of Construction
Interpreted under normal rules of contract construction
(See Nabors Drilling USA, L.P. v. Encana Oil and Gas (USA), Inc., 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 8583, at
*3 (Tex. App. – Fort Worth July 11, 2013, pet. filed) (mem. op.))
Strictly construed against the indemnitee
This rule prohibits the extension, by construction or implication, of the
indemnitor’s obligations beyond the precise terms of the agreement
(See Irvin v. Guarantee Company of North America, U.S.A., 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS August 5,
2008, at *3 (Tex. App. – Dallas August 5, 2008, no pet.) (mem. op.))
But – will not be strictly construed if contract provides
otherwise
(SeeWebb v. Lawson-Avila Construction, 911 S.W.2d 457, 461 (Tex. App. – San Antonio
1995, writ dism’d))
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
5. Three Common Types of
Contractual Indemnity Provisions
Broad Form
Full indemnification regardless of fault
Intermediate Form
Full indemnification so long as any fault rests with
the indemnitor
Limited Form
Indemnification only to the extent of the
indemnitor’s own fault in contributing to the loss
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
6. Contractual Indemnity:
Fair Notice Requirements
“Fair Notice” required for a party to obtain
indemnification for its own negligence in advance
Applies to “Broad Form” and “Intermediate Form”
indemnification provisions
“Fair Notice” has two components:
“Express Negligence” doctrine; and
“Conspicuousness” test
Whether the “Fair Notice” requirements are met is a
matter of law determination for the court
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
7. Contractual Indemnity:
“Express Negligence” Doctrine
Ethyl Corporation v. Daniel Construction Company, 725 S.W.2d 705, 708 (Tex. 1987)
Held that “parties seeking to indemnify the indemnitee from the consequences of its own
negligence must express that intent in clear and specific terms”
Intent must be specifically stated in unambiguous terms within the “four corners” of the
contract
The word “negligence” is likely not necessary if the indemnity provision(s) refer(s)
to negligence by other words, but best practice is to use the specific word anyway
(See Texas Engineering Extension Service v. Gifford, 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 2030 (Tex. App. –
Waco March 14, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op.))
(See Blankenship v. Spectra Energy Corporation, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 10169, at *4 (Tex. App. –
Corpus Christi August 15, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op.))
Note – it has been recognized that “authorities discussing the policy and
applicability of the fair notice requirements to releases are applicable to indemnity
clauses.”
(See OXY, USA, Inc. v. Southwestern Energy Production Company, 161 S.W.3d 277, 283 n.2 (Tex.
App. – Corpus Christi 2005, pet. denied))
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
8. Contractual Indemnity:
“Express Negligence” Doctrine
Since Ethyl, this doctrine has been applied to more than just negligence –
see, e.g.:
Strict liability
Houston Lighting & Power Company v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Company,
890 S.W.2d 455, 459 (Tex. 1994)
DTPA, insurance code violations, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing
The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Texas Workers’ Compensation Insurance Facility,
1998 Tex. App. LEXIS 2045, at *4 (Tex. App. – Austin April 2, 1998, pet. denied) (not
designated for publication)
Breach of warranty
Staton Holdings, Inc. v. Tatum, L.L.C., 345 S.W.3d 729, 735 (Tex. App. – Dallas 2011, pet.
denied)
Intentional conduct
Hamblin v. Lamont, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 14875, at *5 (Tex. App. – San Antonio December
11, 2013, no pet. h.)
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
9. Contractual Indemnity:
“Express Negligence” Doctrine
Public Policy Issues
Watch out for potential public policy issues with indemnity for gross
negligence and/or intentional conduct because the law is unsettled – see, e.g.:
Atlantic Richfield Company v. Petroleum Personnel, Inc., 768 S.W.2d 724, n.2 (Tex. 1989)
(expressly declining to decide whether indemnity for one’s own gross negligence or
intentional injury is permissible, but noting that “[p]ublic policy concerns are presented by
such an issue that have not been argued or briefed by the parties.”)
Smith v. Golden Triangle Raceway, 708 S.W.2d 574, 576 (Tex. App. – Beaumont 1986, no writ)
(holding that “a term in a release attempting to exempt one from liability or damages
occasioned by gross negligence is against public policy.”)
Valero Energy Corporation v. The M.W. Kellogg Construction Company, 866 S.W.2d 252, 258
(Tex. App. – Corpus Christi 1993, writ denied) (holding in a case with sophisticated parties who
heavily negotiated the contract at issue that an agreement providing prospective indemnity
for gross negligence did not offend public policy)
Webb v. Lawson-Avila Construction, 911 S.W.2d 457, 462 (Tex. App. – San Antonio 1995, writ
dism’d) (holding that indemnification provision at issue validly provided indemnification for
gross negligence)
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
10. Contractual Indemnity:
“Express Negligence” Doctrine
Public Policy Issues Continued
Rosen v. National Hot Rod Association, 1995 Tex. App. LEXIS 3225, at *7 (Tex. App. – Houston
[14th Dist.] December 21, 1995, writ denied) (“A release cannot absolve an individual from his
liability for gross negligence.”)
Solis v. Evins, 951 S.W.2d 44, 50 (Tex. App. – Corpus Christ 1997, no writ) (“We find no
authority for the proposition that a party may prospectively contractually exculpate itself with
respect to intentional torts. That would be contrary to public policy.”)
Sydlik v. REEIII, Inc., 195 S.W.3d 329, 336 (Tex. App. – Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, no pet.)
(“[W]hile pre-accident waivers of gross negligence are against public policy, post-accident
releases are not.”) (citing Memorial Medical Center of East Texas v. Keszler, 943 S.W.2d 433,
435 (Tex. 1997) (per curiam)))
Akin v. Bally Total Fitness Corporation, 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 1218, at *3 n.1 (Tex. App. –Waco
February 14, 2007, pet. denied) (mem. op.) (observing that “[m]ost courts hold that pre-injury
waivers of gross negligence are void as against public policy,” but noting conflict and gathering
authorities on both sides of the issue)
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
11. Contractual Indemnity:
“Express Negligence” Doctrine
Public Policy Issues Continued
Cell Comp, L.L.C. v. Southwestern BellWireless, 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 4510, at *6 (Tex. App. –
Corpus Christi June 19, 2008, no pet.) (noting that its own previous decision in Solis held that
it would be “contrary to public policy” for a party to “prospectively contractually exculpate
itself with respect to intentional torts.”)
Blankenship v. Spectra Energy Corporation, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 10169, at *5 n.6 (Tex. App. –
Corpus Christi August 15, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op.) (gathering authorities and observing that
“[t]here is some disagreement among the courts of appeals as to whether a party may validly
release claims of gross negligence.”)
Hamblin v. Lamont, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 14875, at *5 (Tex. App. – San Antonio December 11,
2013, no pet. h.) (invaliding indemnity provision on fair notice grounds but also stating,
“[m]oreover, we question whether public policy would prevent Lamont from ‘prospectively
contractually exculpat[ing himself] with respect to intentional torts’ even if the indemnity
provisions contained the specific language.”)
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
12. Contractual Indemnity:
“Conspicuousness” Test
Dresser Industries v. Page Petroleum, Inc., 853 S.W.2d
505, 509-11 (Tex. 1987)
Adopted UCC definition of conspicuousness:
“A term or clause is conspicuous when it is so written that
a reasonable person against whom it is to operate ought to
have noticed it”
E.g., capital headings, larger font size, contrasting font
color, bold type, etc.
Sliding scale of acceptability based on length and
complexity of the contract at issue
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
13. Contractual Indemnity:
Fair Notice Requirements
“Actual Notice” or “Actual Knowledge” exception
to Fair Notice requirements
Definitely applies to “Conspicuousness” test
Application to “Express Negligence” doctrine
unsettled
(See Sydlik v. REEIII, Inc., 195 S.W.3d 329, 333-34 (Tex. App. – Houston [14th Dist.] 2006,
no pet.))
(See Enron Corp. Savings Plan v. Hewitt Associates, L.L.C., 611 F. Supp. 2d 654, 674-74
(S.D. Tex. 2009))
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
15. Texas Anti-Indemnity Act:
Scope
Effective January 1, 2012
Applies to:
A “construction contract”;
For a “construction project”;
For which an indemnitor is provided or procures insurance subject to
Chapter 151 or Title 10 of the Texas Insurance Code
Chapter 151 relates to Consolidated Insurance Programs
Title 10 relates to regulations for property and casualty
insurance in Texas
Includes standard CGL and WC coverages
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
16. Texas Anti-Indemnity Act:
Important Definitions
Definition of “construction contract” is broad, and
includes a range of private and public contracts,
subcontracts, and agreements
Includes design, construction, alteration, renovation,
remodeling, repair, or the furnishing of material or equipment
Definition of “construction project” includes
construction, maintenance, or repair of improvements
to real property
Excludes projects relating to a single family house, townhouse,
duplex, or land development directly related thereto
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
17. Texas Anti-Indemnity Act:
Application
Voids provisions in applicable contracts that
indemnify parties for their own negligence or fault
Also applies to agreements “collateral to or
affecting” applicable contracts
In essence, prohibits “Broad Form” and
“Intermediate Form” indemnity provisions in
contracts and agreements falling within its scope
Also voids certain “additional insured” provisions in
construction contracts
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
18. Texas Anti-Indemnity Act:
Exceptions
Does not apply to:
Indemnification for claims for bodily injury to or death of “the
indemnitor, its agent, or its subcontractor of any tier”;
An insurance policy, including a policy issued under an owner-controlled
or owner-sponsored consolidated insurance program or
a contractor-controlled or contractor-sponsored consolidated
insurance program, except as provided by Section 151.104;
A cause of action for breach of contract or warranty that exists
independently of an indemnity obligation, including an indemnity
obligation in a construction contract under a construction project
for which insurance is provided under a consolidated insurance
program;
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
19. Texas Anti-Indemnity Act:
Exceptions Continued
Does not apply to:
Indemnity provisions contained in loan and financing documents,
other than construction contracts to which the contractor and
owner’s lender are parties as provided under Section 151.001(5);
General agreements of indemnity required by sureties as a
condition of execution of bonds for construction contracts;
The benefits and protections under the workers’ compensation
laws of this state;
The benefits or protections under the governmental immunity laws
of this state;
Agreements subject to Chapter 127, Civil Practice and Remedies
Code;
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
20. Texas Anti-Indemnity Act:
Exceptions Continued
Does not apply to:
A license agreement between a railroad company and a person that
permits the person to enter the railroad company’s property as an
accommodation to the person for work under a construction contract that
does not primarily benefit the railroad company;
An indemnity provision pertaining to a claim based upon copyright
infringement;
An indemnity provision in a construction contract, or in an agreement
collateral to or affecting a construction contract, pertaining to:
A single family house, townhouse, duplex, or land development directly related thereto;
or
A public works project of a municipality; or
A joint defense agreement entered into after a claim is made
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
21. Texas CPRC 130.001, et seq.:
Architects and Engineers
Voids any provision in a construction contract requiring a contractor
to indemnify a registered architect or licensed engineer for liability
relating to:
Defects in plans, designs, or specifications prepared, approved, or used by the
architect or engineer; or
Negligence of the architect or engineer in the rendition or conduct of
professional duties called for or arising out of the construction plans, designs,
or specifications that are part of the construction contract
Also voids provisions in a construction contract (other than a
contract for a single family or multifamily residence) requiring a
registered architect or licensed engineer to indemnify an owner for
the owner’s own negligence
(See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 130.002(b))
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
22. Texas CPRC 130.001, et seq.:
Architects and Engineers:
Exceptions
Does not apply to:
An insurance contract;
A workers’ compensation agreement;
An owner of an interest in real property or persons employed solely by
that owner, except as provided by Section 130.002(b);
Except as provided by Section 130.002(b), a covenant or promise to:
Indemnify or hold harmless an owner of an interest in real property and persons
employed solely by that owner; or
Allocate, release, liquidate, limit, or exclude liability in connection with a
construction contract between an owner or other person for whom a construction
contract is being performed and a registered architect or licensed engineer
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
23. Texas CPRC 130.001, et seq.:
Architects and Engineers:
Exceptions Continued
Does not apply to:
A contract or agreement in which an architect or engineer
or an agent, servant, or employee of an architect or
engineer is indemnified from liability for:
negligent acts other than those described by this chapter; or
negligent acts of the contractor, any subcontractor, any person
directly or indirectly employed by the contractor or a
subcontractor, or any person for whose acts the contractor or a
subcontractor may be liable
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
24. Texas Oilfield
Anti-Indemnity Act
(TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 127.001, et seq.)
Generally renders void indemnification provisions for an
indemnitee’s own negligence in contracts pertaining to oil,
gas, or water wells or mineral mines
However, does not prohibit indemnity provisions supported
by liability insurance provided by the indemnitor
If unilateral indemnity, the amount of insurance required may not
exceed $500,000
If mutual indemnity obligation, the indemnity obligation is limited to
the extent of the coverage and dollar limits of insurance or qualified
self-insurance each party as indemnitor has agreed to obtain for the
benefit of the other party as indemnitee
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
25. Texas Oilfield
Anti-Indemnity Act
(TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 127.001, et seq.):
Exceptions
Does not apply to:
Joint operating agreements;
Purchasing, selling, gathering, storing, or transporting gas or natural gas liquids by pipeline or fixed
associated facilities; or
Construction, maintenance, or repair of oil, natural gas liquids, or gas pipelines or fixed associated
facilities
Also does not apply to loss or liability for damages or an expense arising from:
Personal injury, death, or property injury that results from radioactivity;
Property injury that results from pollution, including cleanup and control of the pollutant;
Property injury that results from reservoir or underground damage, including loss of oil, gas, other
mineral substance, or water or the well bore itself;
Personal injury, death, or property injury that results from the performance of services to control a
wild well to protect the safety of the general public or to prevent depletion of vital natural resources;
or
Cost of control of a wild well, underground or above the surface
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
26. Texas Oilfield
Anti-Indemnity Act
(TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 127.001, et seq.):
Exceptions Continued
This chapter does not affect:
The validity of an insurance contract; or
A benefit conferred by the workers’ compensation statutes of this
state
This chapter does not deprive an owner of the surface estate
of the right to secure indemnity from a lessee, an operator, a
contractor, or other person conducting operations for the
exploration or production of minerals of the owner’s land
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
27. CPRC Chapter 82:
Manufacturer/Seller Indemnity
Applies to a “products liability action”
“Products liability action” means any action against a manufacturer or
seller for recovery of damages arising out of personal injury, death, or
property damage allegedly caused by a defective product whether the
action is based in strict tort liability, strict products liability, negligence,
misrepresentation, breach of express or implied warranty, or any other
theory or combination of theories
Requires a “manufacturer” to indemnify a “seller” against loss
except for the seller’s:
Negligence;
Intentional misconduct; or
Other act or omission for which the seller is independently liable
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
28. CPRC Chapter 82:
Manufacturer/Seller Indemnity
Who is a manufacturer?
A person who is a designer, formulator, constructor, rebuilder, fabricator,
producer, compounder, processor, or assembler of any product or component
part of a product and who places the product or any component part of the
product in the stream of commerce
Who is a seller?
A person who is engaged in the distributing or otherwise placing products, or
components of products, in the stream of commerce for any commercial
purpose
A person who merely provides services is not a seller
Manufacturers are always sellers, but sellers are not always
manufacturers
(See General Motors v. Hudiburg Chevrolet, 199 S.W.3d 249, 256 (Tex. 2006))
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
29. CPRC Chapter 82:
Manufacturer/Seller Indemnity
Recoverable “loss” includes court costs and other
reasonable expenses, reasonable attorneys’ fees, and
any reasonable damages incurred
Indemnity for “loss” extends to both the underlying action
and an action to enforce an indemnity obligation under this
section
Indemnity should exclude attorneys’ fees and other expenses
attributable to a seller’s independent liability
“Reasonable damages” includes amounts paid by the
seller in settlement
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
30. CPRC Chapter 82:
Manufacturer/Seller Indemnity:
Trigger and Scope of Duty
Duty to indemnify applies regardless of manner in which the products liability
action is concluded:
Settlement;
Judgment; or
Dismissal
No showing of manufacturer liability is required to trigger statutory duty to
indemnify
Instead, duty to indemnify triggered by the claimant’s pleadings
However, duty to indemnify not implicated unless the pleadings can be fairly read to allege a
defect in the manufacturer’s product
Issues raised by multiple manufacturer defendants
(See generally General Motors v. Hudiburg Chevrolet, 199 S.W.3d 249 (Tex. 2006))
(See generally Ansell Healthcare Products v. Owens & Minor, Inc., 251 S.W.3d 499 (Tex. 2008))
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
31. CPRC Chapter 82:
Manufacturer/Seller Indemnity:
Manufacturer “Outs”
Manufacturer may escape indemnity obligation by proving
seller’s independent culpable conduct
Innocent manufacturer of a component product that is not
defective may be considered an innocent “seller” and owed
reciprocal indemnification
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
32. Common Law Indemnity:
Rare But Still There
Some vestiges of common law indemnity survive today,
e.g.:
Purely vicarious employer liability
Purely vicarious landlord-tenant liability
Manufacturer’s duty to indemnify innocent seller
Must be a judicial determination or admission that a
wrongdoer could be legally liable
Until then, indemnity claim is premature
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION
33. Protect Yourself!
Drafting Tips
Indemnitee – insist on provision against strict construction
Indemnitor – do the opposite
Indemnitee – if other party will agree, include indemnity for your own gross negligence and
intentional torts
Be advised that courts may not uphold indemnity for gross negligence or more culpable conduct on
public policy grounds
Indemnitor – unless there is a compelling reason to do so, do not agree to indemnify the
other party for its own gross negligence or intentional torts
Be conspicuous! Make your indemnification provision(s) stand out
Specify claims and levels of negligence
Consider using multiple indemnity provisions in construction contracts
E.g., separate indemnity provisions you know will be enforced from those that may be at risk of
invalidation or limitation by a court
Include a severability clause in the contract
Expressly include a separate agreement to defend, e.g., “defend, indemnify, and hold
harmless….”
If you want to option to select and direct your own counsel, include an agreement on that as well
TAILORED SOLUTIONS
EFFICIENT REPRESENTATION