Robert P. Patterson Jr. was a respected attorney and judge known for championing civil liberties. He worked on the Attica prison uprising case in the 1970s and advocated for an independent investigation. Throughout his career he fought for equal justice and dignity for all, regardless of race or background. Patterson had a long career as a prominent attorney in New York and later served as a federal judge, becoming known for some unconventional rulings. He passed away in 2022 at the age of 91.
THE EMPIRE
Gurmeet Ram Rahim’s Dera owns vast sprawls of property, including an Olympic-size stadium, malls, state-of-the-art hospitals, retail outlets, residential complexes, a fleet of luxury cars and much else. An inside look
Court case, Darren Chaker provides, Stingrey warrant, requires search warrant, involves privacy, constitutional issues in obtaining phone records and data, Fourth Amendment issues are discussed in detail by the court and how the law looks at cutting edge technology.
Anger swells after NSA phone records collection revelationstrupassion
The scale of America's surveillance state was laid bare on Thursday as senior politicians revealed that the US counter-terrorism effort had swept up swaths of personal data from the phone calls of millions of citizens for years.
After the revelation by the Guardian of a sweeping secret court order that authorised the FBI to seize all call records from a subsidiary of Verizon, the Obama administration sought to defuse mounting anger over what critics described as the broadest surveillance ruling ever issued.
THE EMPIRE
Gurmeet Ram Rahim’s Dera owns vast sprawls of property, including an Olympic-size stadium, malls, state-of-the-art hospitals, retail outlets, residential complexes, a fleet of luxury cars and much else. An inside look
Court case, Darren Chaker provides, Stingrey warrant, requires search warrant, involves privacy, constitutional issues in obtaining phone records and data, Fourth Amendment issues are discussed in detail by the court and how the law looks at cutting edge technology.
Anger swells after NSA phone records collection revelationstrupassion
The scale of America's surveillance state was laid bare on Thursday as senior politicians revealed that the US counter-terrorism effort had swept up swaths of personal data from the phone calls of millions of citizens for years.
After the revelation by the Guardian of a sweeping secret court order that authorised the FBI to seize all call records from a subsidiary of Verizon, the Obama administration sought to defuse mounting anger over what critics described as the broadest surveillance ruling ever issued.
This Live Seminar examined how recent legal and policy trends—punctuated by a June 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision—may alter modalities of humanitarian engagement with non-state armed groups. In Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a law criminalizing various forms of “material support” to prohibited groups.
This is a brochure to introduce voters to Libertarian Party presidential candidate Austin Petersen to the American public. Austin Petersen is a 2016 candidate for the White House, running on a platform of economic freedom and personal liberty.
Los Angeles Times, Part A; Pg. 1, June 17, 2004Thomas Tak.docxcroysierkathey
Los Angeles Times, Part A; Pg. 1, June 17, 2004
Thomas' Take on the Law Rooted in 18th Century;
The justice's historical perspective challenges many widely held beliefs about the
Constitution.
David G. Savage, Times Staff Writer
Justice Clarence Thomas may be silent in the Supreme Court during public arguments, but he is not shy about
making bold pronounc ements in written opinions.
His latest challenge to conventional wisdom came this week in the Pledge of Allegiance case, when he opined
that the Constitution protected a state's right to recognize an official church.
Almost everyone has assumed that the opposite is true.
It is not the first time Thomas has tried to turn the standard thinking on its head when it comes to understanding
key parts of the U.S. Constitution. He has done so by focusing on the words and history of the document as it
was written in 1787.
"He likes to say we should look at this afresh. Our law is muddled, and we should rethink it," Yale Law School
professor Akhil Amar said admir ingly of Thomas.
But the conseque nces o f his "re thinking" co uld be far-re aching.
For example, Thomas has argued that the word "commerce" in the Constitution should be understood as it was
in the 18th century: the movement of goods across state lines. Under this view, the states could not erect tariffs
or other barriers to the free flow of goods.
In the 20th century, however, the Supreme Court adopted a much broader view of commerce, relying on that
definition to uphold federal laws that set minimum wages, prohibited discrimination in the workplace,
protected the environment or regulat ed the manufac ture of products, in cluding autos and drugs.
In a separate 1995 opinion, Thomas said that this broad view conflicted with the Constitution and should be
reconsidered. If his colleagues ever agree, many of today's workplace laws would be struck down.
Soon after joining the court in 1991, Thomas wrote that the word "punishment" in the Constitution restricted
only "judges, not jailers." The high court had adopted a broader view of the ban on "cruel and unusual
punishment" in the 1970s and protected prisoners from being subjected to needlessly cruel treatment.
When Thomas denounced this view as flatly mistaken, Justice Harry A. Blackmun pointed out that his opinion
would permit the t orture of inmate s by prison guards.
Two years ago, Thomas condemned the doctrine supporting the separation of church and state, saying it grew
out of "anti-Catholic bigotry" during the 19th century. Then, Protestants controlled the public schools, and
immigrant Catholics set up their own schools to escape the Protestant influence, he said.
Beginning in the 1940s, a unanimous Supreme Court said that the 1st Amendment erected a "wall of separation
between church and state," quoting Thomas Jefferson. Relying on that view, the court in the early 1960s struck
down state-sponsored prayers and Bible readings in the public schools. Later, the justice ...
Los Angeles Times, Part A; Pg. 1, June 17, 2004Thomas Tak.docxwashingtonrosy
Los Angeles Times, Part A; Pg. 1, June 17, 2004
Thomas' Take on the Law Rooted in 18th Century;
The justice's historical perspective challenges many widely held beliefs about the
Constitution.
David G. Savage, Times Staff Writer
Justice Clarence Thomas may be silent in the Supreme Court during public arguments, but he is not shy about
making bold pronounc ements in written opinions.
His latest challenge to conventional wisdom came this week in the Pledge of Allegiance case, when he opined
that the Constitution protected a state's right to recognize an official church.
Almost everyone has assumed that the opposite is true.
It is not the first time Thomas has tried to turn the standard thinking on its head when it comes to understanding
key parts of the U.S. Constitution. He has done so by focusing on the words and history of the document as it
was written in 1787.
"He likes to say we should look at this afresh. Our law is muddled, and we should rethink it," Yale Law School
professor Akhil Amar said admir ingly of Thomas.
But the conseque nces o f his "re thinking" co uld be far-re aching.
For example, Thomas has argued that the word "commerce" in the Constitution should be understood as it was
in the 18th century: the movement of goods across state lines. Under this view, the states could not erect tariffs
or other barriers to the free flow of goods.
In the 20th century, however, the Supreme Court adopted a much broader view of commerce, relying on that
definition to uphold federal laws that set minimum wages, prohibited discrimination in the workplace,
protected the environment or regulat ed the manufac ture of products, in cluding autos and drugs.
In a separate 1995 opinion, Thomas said that this broad view conflicted with the Constitution and should be
reconsidered. If his colleagues ever agree, many of today's workplace laws would be struck down.
Soon after joining the court in 1991, Thomas wrote that the word "punishment" in the Constitution restricted
only "judges, not jailers." The high court had adopted a broader view of the ban on "cruel and unusual
punishment" in the 1970s and protected prisoners from being subjected to needlessly cruel treatment.
When Thomas denounced this view as flatly mistaken, Justice Harry A. Blackmun pointed out that his opinion
would permit the t orture of inmate s by prison guards.
Two years ago, Thomas condemned the doctrine supporting the separation of church and state, saying it grew
out of "anti-Catholic bigotry" during the 19th century. Then, Protestants controlled the public schools, and
immigrant Catholics set up their own schools to escape the Protestant influence, he said.
Beginning in the 1940s, a unanimous Supreme Court said that the 1st Amendment erected a "wall of separation
between church and state," quoting Thomas Jefferson. Relying on that view, the court in the early 1960s struck
down state-sponsored prayers and Bible readings in the public schools. Later, the justice.
1. Case Summary In a narrative format, brief the Dred Scott case.docxSONU61709
1. Case Summary: In a narrative format, brief the Dred Scott case: detail the facts, issues and court holdings.
2. Case Analysis: What effect did the passage of 14th Amendment have on the precedential value of the decision in the Dred Scott case?
3. Case Analysis: Compare and contrast the three rights conferred on national citizens by the 14th Amendment.
4. Executive Decisions: If you were a Supreme Court Justice during the 1800's, would you interpret that Congress intended to incorporate the Bill of Rights into privileges of national citizenship? Give the rationale for your decision.
C H A P T E R 1
The Meaning of
Criminal Procedure
The Constitution of the United States was ordained, it is true, by descendants of Englishmen,
who inherited the traditions of English law and history; but it was made for an
undefined and expanding future, and for a people gathered and to be
gathered from many nations and of many tongues.
—JUSTICE STANLEY MATTHEWS, Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516, 530–31 (1884)
CHAPTER OUTLINE
ORDER AND LIBERTY
Criminal Procedure and the Constitution
Order, Liberty, and the Two Models of Criminal Justice
The Dangers of Injustice
Criminal Justice and Alternate Justice Systems
LEGAL FOUNDATIONS
Law
The Court System
Federalism
The Special Role of the Supreme Court
THE CONTEXT OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
INCORPORATING THE BILL OF RIGHTS
Before the Civil War
The Growth of Federal Judicial Power
Dred Scott and the Fourteenth Amendment
The Anti-incorporation Cases, 1884–1908
Adopting the Due Process Approach
Incorporating First Amendment Civil Liberties
Resistance to Incorporation and Growing Support,
1937–1960
The Due Process Revolution, 1961–1969
The Counterrevolution
LAW IN SOCIETY: TERRORISM, JUSTICE,
AND LIBERTY
Justice and Liberty in Times of National Crisis
The Global War on Terror and the Threat to Liberty
Detainees: The Court’s Finest Hour
Blowback
SUMMARY
APPENDIX TO CHAPTER 1: HOW TO READ
AND BRIEF CASES
Notes on Legal Precedent
The Components of an Opinion
Briefing a Case
JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT:
THE PRECURSOR JUSTICES
John M. Harlan I
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.
Louis Dembitz Brandeis
Benjamin Nathan Cardozo
1
M01_ZALM7613_06_SE_CH01.QXD 1/11/10 5:01 PM Page 1
G
A
R
R
E
T
T
,
M
E
G
A
N
1
3
2
4
T
S
2 Chapter 1
KEY TERMS
adequate and independent
state grounds
affirm
brief
Burger Court
case law
certiorari, writ of
checks and balances
common law
constitutionalism
court of general jurisdiction
court of limited jurisdiction
Crime Control Model
dictum
due process approach
Due Process Model
ex post facto law
federalism
fundamental rights test
habeas corpus, writ of
hierarchy of constitutional
rights
holding
human rights
incorporation doctrine
incorporation plus
judicial craftsmanship
judicial restraint
judicial review
jurisdiction
law
legal reasoning
liberty
opinion
order
overrule
police state
precedent
private law
procedural law
public law
Rehnquist Court
remand
remedial law
rever ...
Terry Nussberger Top-notch Attorney-at-law In Eau Claire
1. Terry Nussberger Top-notch Attorney-at-law In Eau Claire
Terry Nussberger is well known for Guiding Folks Around Wisconsin Community
One of the most respected attorneys in the legal field who Terry Nussberger follows the work of is
Robert P. Patterson, Jr.
Robert P. Patterson Jr., a former government court which championed experienced civil liberties for
the charged and convicted and combated to hold guards and state cannon fodders liable for the
casualties among inmates after the Attica jail defiance in 1971, passed away on Tuesday in
Manhattan. He was 91.
The cause was several myeloma cancer, his child Anne Patterson Finn said.
The uprising at the Attica Reformatory in upstate New york city caused the fatalities of 32 inmates
and 11 adjustment officers and also civilian employees. Just about one guard and also 3 prisoners
were eliminated in what one district attorney branded a wanton "turkey shoot" by state troopers.
Afterward, Court Patterson, who was engaging in legislation at the time, portioned on a five-member
panel designated to secure the civil liberties of Attica prisoners.
In 1975, when he was a vice head of state of bench organization in New York City, he stood for
Malcolm H. Bell, a previous principal assistant prosecutor in the Attica case, that dealt in a letter to
the New York attorney general of the united states, Louis J. Lefkowitz, that Mr. Bell's former boss,
Anthony G. Simonetti, the principal district attorney, had actually perhaps hidden criminal activities
by regulation enforcement officers.
Mr. Patterson asserted to Gov. Hugh L. Carey's counsel, Judah Gribetz, that the charges would
certainly have been "fairly very easy to verify" had they been prosecuted previously. It was Mr.
Patterson's request for an independent inquiry that motivated the governor to designate an unique
state private investigator, Bernard S. Meyer, a former justice on the Court of Appeals, the state's
highest court.
"In my point of view," Mr. Patterson said at the time, "the prosecution, whether by purpose or by
poor management and also major mistakes in judgment, as sourced in the report, has permitted so
significantly time to pass as to provide useless any effort to prosecute effectively any sort of criminal
offenses by police officers against inmates.".
Advertisement.
Basically, the special prosecutor, Alfred J. Scotti, agreed. In February 1976, Mr. Scotti, a former
principal aide district attorney in Manhattan, recommended, "for justice," losing charges against 13
inmates and also the single state cannon fodder which had actually been prosecuted. The detainees
had been accuseded of attack or kidnapping; the trooper, with carelessly releasing a shotgun
throughout the siege.
Court Patterson, whose papa was a federal government judge, may have appeared destined for a
profession in the law, however he was defiant as a young people and was still considering some
other occupation also after university. "I didn't desire to be a lawyer when I went to regulation
2. school due to the fact that I didn't wish to follow in my dad's footprints," he informed The New York
Times in 1975.
Those footsteps were formidable. Along with being a court, Robert P. Patterson Sr. was under
secretary of battle during World Battle II and also assistant of war under President Harry S. Truman
from 1945 to 1947, when he was mainly accepted with integrating the armed pressures.
Ad.
Continue checking out the primary tale.
Continue reading the major story.
The younger Judge Patterson altered his
mind, he later stated, when he understood
that a legal profession presented chances
for public service. As a youthful lawyer, he
worked for 2 months as a Lawful Aid
Society volunteer in the criminal courts, an
experience he accepted with motivating an
enduring commitment to equal justice, no
matter of race or class.
Robert Concierge Patterson Jr. was born in
Manhattan on July 11, 1923. His mother,
the previous Margaret Winchester,
managed Fair Oaks, the family farm in the
Hudson Valley.
After finishing from Harvard then Columbia Regulation Institution, he joined Donovan, Leisure,
Newton, Lumbard & Irvine as well as later worked as an assistant advice to the state crime
commission and as an assistant federal government prosecutor. In 1956, he signed up with
Patterson, Belknap & Webb (later on Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler), the company established
by his father.
The senior Court Patterson was gotten rid of in addition to even more compared to 30 others in 1952
in the collision of a twin-engine American Airlines Convair in a residential location of Elizabeth, N.J
. That same year, Robert Jr. wed the former Bevin Daly. She passed away in 2011. Along with his
daughter Anne, he is made it through by two various other children, Margaret and also Katherine
Patterson; a kid, Paul; as well as four grandchildren.
Among the lawyers he recruited to the team were Zachary W. Carter, a previous government
prosecutor as well as now New York City's primary attorney; a previous Usa attorney general of the
united states, Michael B. Mukasey; as well as previous Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani. Judge Patterson
additionally worked as president of the New york city State Bar Organization and the Lawful Help
Society in New York as well as chairman of Prisoners' Legal Solutions.
"I don't think I'm an individual who thinks that there shouldn't be any jails, period," Mr. Patterson as
3. soon as said. "But even a fierce lawbreaker is entitled to the basic components of human dignity.".
In 1988, on the suggestion of Senator Daniel P. Moynihan, a Democrat, President Reagan designated
him to the Federal Area Court for the Southern District of New York. Judge Patterson, a Republican
politician, became a senior judge in 1998, but never officially retired. In 1990, Judge Patterson ruled
that the New York City Transit Authority can not call for medication testing of all its employees,
simply those with safety-related works. That exact same year, he stated unconstitutional proposed
government restrictions on access to telephone-pornography services.
Court Patterson had no agitations regarding punishing the previous president of Guatemala, Alfonso
Portillo, to prison for nearly six years in a money-laundering instance in 2013. However he was
irritated by federal tips that forced him to enforce a sentence of two years and also three months in
2003 on a South Oriental immigrant, a postal employee which had actually axed seven tries from a
handgun at the United Nations constructing to protest North Korea's treatment of its residents. The
court said the man was making a political statement instead of planning to bring upon injury.
In 1995, Court Patterson nullified a 25-cent New york city City Transportation price boost, to $1.50,
coupled with a proportionally smaller sized rise for traveler railways. He stated the increase was a
civil rights infraction considering that a lot of train and bus bikers were black or Hispanic, while
most rural rail commuters were white. He was overthrown by an appellate court.
Judge Patterson could be wacky and acerbic in the court. During a hearing in the transportation
price case, he added, "Objection suffered," as a legal representative presented a concern to a
witness-- before the opposing attorney had actually even registered a complaint.
The elder Court Patterson was killed along with even more than 30 others in 1952 in the accident of
a twin-engine American Airlines Convair in a household location of Elizabeth, N.J
. Court Patterson, a Republican politician, ended up being an elderly judge in 1998, yet never
formally retired. In 1990, Court Patterson ruled that the New York City Transportation Authority can
not call for drug screening of all its employees, just those with safety-related tasks. Judge Patterson
had no qualms regarding sentencing the previous head of state of Guatemala, Alfonso Portillo, to jail
for nearly 6 years in a money-laundering situation in 2013. In 1995, Judge Patterson voided a 25-
cent New York City Transit fare rise, to $1.50, coupled with a proportionally smaller boost for
commuter railroads.