This document presents arguments against the theory of evolution and natural selection. It claims that the theory of evolution is not a scientific law because it is flawed and errors. It provides 9 points arguing why natural selection and evolution are scientifically impossible based on examples of skin color in humans in different climates, lack of fur on humans, and inability of species to change into new species. It also argues that the education system indoctrinates students to accept evolution without questioning it, and that natural selection cannot create new traits or species based on environment.

1. TALLER DE CIENCIAS SOCIALES
(Semana del 20 al 24 de Abril)1
(Trabajo de Clase)
1- (Luegoderealizarlalecturadeltextoa continuaciónextraigatresconclusiones)
(Reflexión)
SEPARACIÓN ENTRE IGLESIA Y ESTADO
por el Hermano Pablo
El juicio estaba llegando a su fin. Toda la evidencia pesaba en contra del acusado. La
sentencia de muerte sin duda caería sobre Carlos Chambers. Había matado a una mujer de
setenta años para robarle. Seguramente lo condenarían a la cámara de gas.
El fiscal, a fin de reafirmar su tesis, tuvo la ocurrencia de citar la Biblia: «Dios dice que el que
derrama sangre de hombre, por el hombre su sangre será derramada.»
Ante esto el abogado defensor pidió que se anulara la sentencia, y el juez se vio obligado a
conceder la petición. La ley dictaba que no se podía citar la Biblia para acusar a un hombre.
Esto se debía a que en ese país había estricta separación entre Iglesia y Estado. Así que por
referirse a la Biblia, el fiscal perdió su caso.
He aquí un caso interesante. Sucede en un país donde ocurren toda clase de argucias jurídicas
extrañas, y se presta para una seria reflexión. Un asesino merece la pena de muerte. No
debiera haber escape. Pero al citar la Biblia para condenarlo, se ponen en juego tretas
jurídicas, y el hombre se salva.
Vale la pena preguntarnos: Al fin de cuentas, ¿en qué se basan las leyes humanas de todos los
países del mundo para definir un delito? Si no puede citarse la Biblia en el juicio de un asesino,
tampoco debe poder citarse para condenar a un adúltero, o a un mentiroso, o a un ladrón, o a
quien sea culpable de cualquier delito.
Los Diez Mandamientos, que se encuentran en el Libro Sagrado, fijan y establecen la moral
humana. Si no hubiera Biblia y no existiera ese Decálogo de Moisés, el hombre no tendría ley a
la cual sujetarse. ¿Cuál sería el resultado? Se regiría sólo por la violencia y la fuerza. Su única
ley sería su propio capricho personal.
En los días previos al diluvio universal, nadie obedecía a nadie. No había ley, no había moral,
no había norma de vida. Regía sólo la violencia. Cada uno establecía su propia ley. Fue
entonces que Dios envió el diluvio, para comenzar un nuevo pueblo.
Lo cierto es que aunque Dios jamás hubiera mandado a escribir sus mandamientos en tablas
de piedra o en ninguna otra parte, el homicidio sería criminal, el adulterio sería inmoral, el robo
sería ruin, y todo pecado sería maligno. Lo que no está escrito en tablas de piedra, está escrito
en la conciencia humana. Y todos hemos violado la ley de la conciencia.
¿Habrá salvación para el pecador? Sí, la hay, con toda seguridad. Por eso dio su vida
Jesucristo en la cruz del Calvario: para pagar el precio de nuestra redención. Podemos acudir a
Él. Cristo murió por nuestra maldad. Por eso se llama Salvador. Rindámosle nuestra vida.
1 http://www.conciencia.net/?ID=2014abr08

2. 2- Análisis de texto (Lea con atención y traduzca el siguiente texto)
9 Scientific Facts Prove the "Theory of Evolution" is False
The Theory of Evolution is not a scientific
law or a law of biology. A scientific law must
be 100% correct.
Failure to meetonly one challenge proves
the law is wrong. This article will prove that
the Theory of Evolution fails many
challenges,notsimplyone.
The Theory of Evolution will never become
a law of science because itis wroughtwith
errors.This is why it is still called a theory,
instead ofa law. The process ofnatural
selection is notan evolutionary process.
The DNA in plants and animals allows
selective breeding to achieve desired
results.Dogs are a good example of
selective breeding.The DNA in all dogs has
many recessive traits.
A desired traitcan be produced in dogs by
selecting dogs with a particular trait to produce
offspring with that trait. This specialized selective
breeding can continue for generation after
generation until a breed of dog is developed.
This is the same as the "survival of the fittest"
theory of the evolutionists.
Many differenttypes of dogs can be developed
this way, but they can never develop a cat by
selectively breeding dogs.Natural selection can
never extend outside ofthe DNA limit.DNA
cannotbe changed into a new species by
natural selection.The same process ofselective
breeding is done with flowers,fruits,and
vegetables.
New variations of the species are possible,buta
new species has never been developed by
science.In fact, the mostmodern laboratories
are unable to produce a left-hand protein as
found in humans and animals.Evolutionistfail to
admitthat no species has ever been proven to
have evolved in any way. Evolution is simplypie-
in-the-skyconjecture withoutscientific proof.
If natural selection were true,Eskimos would
have fur to keep warm,but they don't. They are
justas hairless as everyone else.If natural
selection were true,humans in the tropics would
have silver, reflective skin to help them keep
cool, but they don't. They have black skin,just
the opposite ofwhat the theory of natural
selection would predict.
If natural selection were true humans at northern
latitudes would have black skin, but they have
white skin instead,except the Eskimos who
have skin that is halfway between white and
black. The people from Russia and the Nordic
countries have white skin,blood hair and blue
eyes. This is the opposite ofwhat one would
predictif natural selection controlled skin color.
Many evolutionists argue thatmelanin is a
natural sunscreen thatevolved in a greater
amountto protect dark-skinned people who live
near the Equator. They simplyignore the fact
that dark-skinned Eskimos live north of the Arctic
Circle.Melanin in the skin is not a sound
argumentin favor of evolution. Dark-skinned
people have always lived near the Equator, not
white-skinned people,even though the dark skin
is more uncomfortable in the hot, sunny climate.
Black skin absorbs the heatfrom the sun's rays
more than white skin.Humans show no sign of
natural selection based on the environment.The
theory of natural selection is wrong because it
cannotcreate something in the DNA that wasn't
there in the beginning.
Animals like bears,tigers,lions,and zebras
living near the equator have heavy fur while

3. humans living north of the Artic Circle have bare
skin.A leopard from the jungle near the equator
has fur like the snow leopard of the Himalayas.
The snow leopard grows thicker hair butthe
jungle leopard would also ifmoved to a cold
climate.Horses and dogs grow a heavy winter
coat in colder climates.Natural selection isn't
working as falselyclaimed by Charles Darwin.
The cheetah in Africa is an example of an animal
in the cat family with very limited variety in the
DNA. Each cheetah looks like an identical twin.
The cheetah DNA is so identical that the skin
from one cheetah can be grafted into another
cheetah withoutany rejection by the body.
Evolution is Scientifically
Impossible
Evolution is a theory developed one hundred
and forty years ago by Charles Darwin (N/A
actually, by his grandfather in 1794 - before
Charles was even born),before science had the
evidence available to prove the theory false.
His famous book,On the Origin of Species by
Means of Natural Selection,has a title that is
now known to be scientificallyfalse.New
species cannotevolve by natural selection.
Modern scientific discoveries are proving
evolution to be impossible.No new scientific
discoveries have been found to supportthe
Theory of Evolution.
Life did not start with a bolt of lightning striking a
pond of water as claimed by the main stream
scientists.
Kids are taught that life can evolve given enough
time.This is a false statementwithoutany
scientific support.
They are taughtthat if given enough time,a
monkeyat a typewriter could punch keys at
random and eventually type President's
Abraham Lincoln Gettysburg Address.This is
nonsense.
Time does notmake impossible things possible.
As an example,a computer was programmed in
an attemptto arrive at the simple 26-letter
alphabet.After 35,000,000,000,000 (35 trillion)
attempts it has only arrived at 14 letters
correctly.
What are the odds that a simple single cell
organism could evolve given the complexity of
more than 60,000 proteins of 100 different
configurations all in the correct places? Never in
eternity! Time does notmake impossible things
possible.(...)
The Indoctrination System
Called "Education"
The educational system teaches children notto
think. Any studentwho uses logic and solid
scientific evidence to question the Theory of
Evolution is ridiculed and insulted into
submission.The students who submitbecome
non-thinking robots who dare notquestion the
dogma presented.
A forth-grade elementaryschool class was
observed at the park playing a three-legged race
game,where adjacentlegs ofthe two kids were
placed into a bag. The kids mustcooperate with
each step in order to run. The kids thoughtit was
great fun. The teacher told them they were being
trained to cooperate.
Actually, it was brainwashing kids into
conforming to a system in which they are not
allowed to have individual thoughts or opinions.
They mustbecome a "team player" and submit
to peer pressure.Communistcountries have
used this same brainwashing technique for
decades.The brainwashing ofschool children
continues by teaching them there is no absolute
right or wrong,and the teacher is absolutely
positive aboutit.
Whatever the children think is right for them is
OK. That is of course until they question
evolution. They are then told they are wrong.
This brainwashing results in children who are
unable to think logically, scientifically,and
accurately. (...)
Scientific Fact No.
1 - Birds Prove Natural
Selectionis Naturally Wrong
The body and soul ofDarwin's Theory of
Evolution was the idea that evolution was made
possible through natural selection.This concept
is based on the suggestion thatthose members
of a species thatare a little stronger,a little
larger,or run a little faster will live longer to
procreate offspring with these superior

4. adaptations.
Darwin's theory suggests thatmillions of
generations later the changes will result in new
species.These adaptations are called links or
intermediates between the old species and the
new.
The idea of natural selection sounds greatwhen
considering deer.The deer that can sense
danger the quickestand run the fastestare able
to escape the predator on a more consistent
basis.However,other examples on the
"evolutionary tree" have many flaws.
One of the bestexamples ofevolution nonsense
is the thoughtthat a wingless bird began to
evolve a wing.Why this would occur is not
answered byevolutionists.The wing stub did not
make the bird more adaptable to his
environment.The firstwing stubs would be
much too small for the bird to fly.
Why would a bird evolve wing stubs that are
useless? This is backwards from the
evolutionary theory of natural selection,which
states that birds adaptand change in order to
survive better in their environment.The bird with
a half-size wing is placed at a disadvantage in its
environment.
Why would the bird continue for millions of
generations to improve a wing stub that is
useless? The Theoryof Evolution is based on
natural selection ofthe mostadaptable member
of a species,notthe weakest.A bird with a
useless wing is ata severe disadvantage.This is
the opposite ofnatural selection.
According to natural selection,the members of
the bird species with the smallestuseless wing
would be the mostadaptable and mostlikelyto
survive in the largestnumbers.According to the
theory of natural selection birds could never
evolve to fly.
We are then led to believe that some birds got
tired of carrying around a worthless half-size
wing,so they grew fingers on the end to help
climb trees.The wings became arms and a new
species was developed.
Evolutionists saybirds grew hollow bones for
less weightin order to fly. How would a bird pass
this long-term plan to the millions ofgenerations
in order to keep the lighter bone plan
progressing? The evolutionaryconceptof
growing a wing over millions ofgenerations
violates the very foundation of evolution: the
natural selection.
Birds aren't the only species thatproves the
theory of natural selection to be wrong.The
problem can be found in all species in one way
or another.Take fish for example.
We are told by evolutionists thata fish wiggled
out of the sea onto dry land and became a land
creature. So let's examine this idea.OK, a fish
wiggles outof the sea and onto the land,but he
can't breathe air. This could happen.Fish do
stupid things attimes.Whales keep swimming
up onto the beach where they die.Do you think
the whales are trying to expedite a multi-million
generation plan to grow legs? Thatconcept is
stupid,but let's get back to the fish story.
The gills ofthe fish are made for extracting
oxygen from water, not from air. He chokes and
gasps before flipping back into the safety of the
water. Why would he do such a stupid thing?
This wiggling and choking continues for millions
of generation until the fish chokes less and less.
His gills evolve into lungs so he can breathe air
on dry land,but now he is at risk of drowning in
the water.
One day he simplystays out on the land and
never goes back into the water. Now he is a
lizard.
Giant dinosaurs literallyexploded onto the scene
during the Triassic period.The fossil record
(petrified bones found in the ground as at the
Dinosaur National Park in Jensen,Utah,USA)
shows no intermediate or transitional species.
Where are the millions ofyears of fossils
showing the transitional forms for dinosaurs?
They do not not exist, because the dinosaurs did
not evolve.
Books published byevolutionists have shown
the giantCetiosaurus dinosaur with the long
neck extending uprighteating from the treetops.
They claimed natural selection was the reason
Cetiosaurus had a long neck. This gave them an
advantage in reaching fodder that other species
could not reach.
One day during the assemblyof a skeleton for a
museum displaysomeone noticed the neck
vertebrae were such that the neck could not be
lifted higher than stretched horizontally in front of
them.The natural selection theory was proven to
be a big lie. The Cetiosaurus dinosaur was an
undergrowth eater.The long neck actually

5. placed the Cetiosaurus ata disadvantage in his
environment,justthe opposite from the natural
Theory of Natural Selection.
Evolutionists will now claim the animal evolved a
long neck because he had the advantage of
eating from bushes on the other side of the river.
This is typical logic of an evolutionist.
Scientific Fact No. 2 - Species
Without a Link Prove Evolution
Theory is Wrong
The evolutionistwill claim thatthe presence of
many individual species proves evolution.This
shallow statementis devoid ofreason,logic,and
scientific proof.
Evolutionists line up pictures ofsimilar-looking
species and claim theyevolved one from
another.The human "familytree" is an example
of this flawed theory. Petrified skulls and bones
exist from hundreds ofspecies ofextinct
monkeys and apes.
Evolutionists line up the mostpromising choices
to presenta gradual progression from monkeyto
modern man.They simplyfill in the big gaps with
make-believe creatures to fit the picture.
This procedure can be done with humans only
because there are many extinct monkeyand ape
species.Theynever do this with giraffes,
elephants or the Platypus. (...)
The pictures are simplya grouping of individual
species thatdoes notprove evolution.
Close to the Missing Link -- OldestHuman
Ancestor Discovered;
Why do they claim the above discovery is "close
to the missing link"? The answer is simple.Look
at the picture: It is a monkey. A monkey species
that has become extinct. Lots of species have
become extinct. Millions of species have
become extinct.
It is obviouslynot similar to a human.Look at the
feet with the big toe spread away from the
smaller toes exactly like a modern chimpanzee,
not like people.
A newly discovered extinct species does not
prove a "missing link"has been found.
Charles Darwin admitted thatfossils ofthe
transitional links between species would have to
be found in order to prove his "Theory of
Evolution." Well, these transitional links have
never been found. We only find individual
species.
Evolutionists try to form these individual species
into a link according to similar major features
such as wings or four legs,butthis simply
proves the Theory of Evolution to be a fraud.
Darwin was hopeful thatfuture fossils would
prove his theory correct, but instead,the lack of
transitional links has proven his theory to be
wrong.
The presence ofindividual species actually
proves they were not developed by an
evolutionary process.If evolution were true, all
plants,animals,and insects would be in a
continual state of change.No two creatures
would be identical,because they would not be
separate species.All life forms would be a
continual blend ofcharacteristics withouta clear
definition among the species.Everything would
be changing,and every animal,insect,and plant
would be different.
The cheetah above proves evolution does not
exist. All species are locked solidlywithin their
DNA code.
Evolutionists are going ape over "Ape-Girl"
The fossilized bones ofa new animal have been
found in Ethiopia near the site where "Lucy" was
discovered manyyears ago.By the way, Lucy
was a monkey,not an early humanoid.The
number ofbones of the Ape-girl skeleton are
unique because Lucyhad only a few head
fragments.
This find gives us a lot of information aboutthe
animal because major parts ofthe skeleton were
unearthed (assuming these are all from the
same animal).It has teeth in the jaw and is said

6. to also have unerupted teeth still within the jaw.
The evolutionists call the animal a "human-like"
female child aboutthree years of age and an
"individual."This is not a "human-like"fossil.It is
an "ape-like"fossil because itwas an ape.
The evolutionists call the animal a "transitional
species"and a human ancestor even though it
has a head exactly like a modern-dayape.The
jaw is thrust forward and the forehead pushed
back and slanted.The true appearance is more
easilyseen from side picture below.
Ape-girl also has arms "thatdangled down to
justabove the knees.It also had gorilla-like
shoulder blades which suggestitcould have
been skilled atswinging through trees."
So, it looks like an ape, it has a head like an
ape, it has arms like an ape,it has shoulder
blades like an ape - It is obviously an ape,not a
human,pre-human or humanoid.This animal is
simplya young ape. Its size is as would be
expected for a young modern-dayape.
The age of this fossilized animal is also very
much in doubt. Scientists manyyears ago
claimed a tooth found was Nebraska Man, a pre-
human fossil millions ofyears old. They
determined the age of the tooth. The scientists
had sculptured an entire ape-like skeleton from
information they found in one tooth. These lies
were exposed when real scientists found the
tooth to be from a peccary, an animal similar to
(and closelyrelated to) pigs.
'Lucy's baby' found in Ethiopia - BBC News -
September 21,2006;
"The 3.3-million-year-old fossilised remains of a
human-like child have been unearthed in Ethiopia's
Dikika region. The find consists of the whole skull,
the entire torso, and important parts of the upper and
lower limbs. CT scans reveal unerupted teeth still in
the jaw, a detail that makes scientists think the
individual may have been about three years old when
she died."
Remarkably,some quite delicate bones not
normallypreserved in the fossilisation process
are also present,such as the hyoid, or tongue,
bone.The hyoid bone reflects how the voice box
is builtand perhaps whatsounds a species can
produce.
Judging by how well it was preserved,the
skeleton mayhave come from a body that was
quickly buried by sedimentin a flood,the
researchers said."In my opinion,afarensis is a
very good transitional species for what was
before four million years ago and what came
after three million years,"Dr Alemseged told
BBC science correspondentPallab Ghosh.
"[The species had] a mixture of ape-like and human-
like features. This puts afarensis in a special position
to play a pivotal role in thestory of what we are and
where we come from."
Climbing Ability
"This early ancestor possessed primitive teeth and a
small brain but it stood upright and walked on two
feet. There is considerable argument about whether
the Dikika girl could also climb trees like an ape.
This climbing ability would require anatomical
equipment like long arms, and the'Lucy' species had
arms that dangled down to just above the knees. It
also had gorilla-like shoulder blades which suggest it
could have been skilled at swinging through trees.
But the question is whether such features indicate
climbing ability or are just 'evolutionary baggage'."
Evolution is in trouble. The growth of biological
knowledge is producing scientific facts that
contradictthe evolutionary theory, not confirm it,
a fact that famous Prof.Steven Jay Gould of
Harvard has described as "the trade secretof
paleontology."
The fossil record simplydoes notsupportthe

7. evolutionary theory, which claims there once
existed a series ofsuccessive forms leading to
the present-dayorganism.The theory states that
infinitesimal changes within each generation
evolve into a new species,butthe scientific fact
remains.Theydon't.
Fossils prove the sudden emergence ofa new
species outofnowhere,complete with
characteristics unknown in any other species.
The fossil record has no intermediate or
transitional forms.This is popularlyknown as the
"missing link"problem,and it exists in all
species.The missing link problem is getting
worse,not better, with the discovery of more
fossils.
The missing links are notbeing discovered,
which proves they never existed. Darwin
assumed transitional forms would be discovered
in the fossil record over time, but that has not
been the case.The fossil record,or lack thereof,
is a major embarrassmentto evolutionists.
The fossil record is a serious rebuke ofthe
Theory of Evolution. New species explode onto
the scene outof nowhere.New fossil discoveries
continue to prove evolution to be wrong.
Evolution: A Theory in Crisis byMichael Denton;
Michael Denton says,
"Despitethetremendous increase in geological
activity in every corner of theglobe and despitethe
discovery of many strange and hitherto unknown
forms, the infinitude of connecting links has still not
been discovered and the fossil record is about as
discontinuous as it was when Darwin was writing the
Origin."
A reader of the Michael Denton's book says,
"Denton a Molecular Biologist removes all of the
supports (if thereever were any) from Darwin's
theory of macro-evolution (continuity of life). Denton
blasts all of the previous arguments made by the pro-
evolutionists showing that there is essentially no
support of macro-evolution in thefossil record. He
also, clearly demonstrates that there is no support
coming from his specialty molecular biology. In the
end the only sound explanation he can make is that
life is profoundly discontinuous."
Harvard Professor Gould claims thatevolution
occurs in spurts,not gradually.This theory
attempts to explain the lack of continuity in the
fossil record.However, this theory is more
troublesome than the gradual change theory.
Large jumps or spurts in the fossil record don't
prove evolution at all. In fact, they disprove
evolution.
The theory that evolution can occur in spurts,
because the fossil record shows itdid not occur
gradually,is a wild stretch of the imagination.
Species have some characteristics similar to
other species,butsimilaritydoesn'tprove any
evolutionary link whatsoever.There are more
than missing links in biology.There are entire
missing chains in 100% ofthe branches ofthe
evolutionary tree.
Many species are dependantupon another
species for their coexistence.Hummingbirds and
flowers are a good example.The flower would
not be pollinated and would become extinct
withoutthe bird. They are said to have
coevolved together. That is a stretch of the
imagination withoutany basis in science.There
are hundreds ofthese examples thatcannotbe
explained.
Charles Darwin had concern abouthis theory of
natural selection.He knew that a failure to find
the missing transitional links would seriously
cripple his theory of evolution, but he was
hopeful the missing links would be found some
day. Well, guess what? He died not finding
them.Evolutionists have never found the
missing links.Each time they announce finding
one, it is later proven to be false.
The "Living Fossil"Fish Proves Evolution is
Wrong
The Coelacanth fish was touted to be a
transitional form with half-formed legs and
primitive lungs,ready to transition onto land.
This myth was exploded in December,1938
when a live Coelacanth was caughtin a

8. fisherman's netoff the eastern coastof South
Africa. It is now known that the natives of the
Comoro Islands had been catching and eating
the fish for years.
It did not have half-formed legs or primitive
lungs.It was simplya regular fish that people
thoughtwas extinct. Evolutionistclaimed the 350
million-year-old Coelacanth evolved into animals
with legs,feet, and lungs.
This not the case.We now see that the fish
recently caught is exactly like the 350 million-
year-old fossil.It did not evolve at all.
The Coelacanth is a star witness againstthe
false theory of evolution.After 350 million years,
the fish still doesn'thave a leg to stand on.
Fisherman catches 'living fossil' - BBC News -
August 1, 2007;
"The 1.3m-long (4.3ft), 50kg (110lb) coelacanth is
only the second ever to have been captured in Asia
and has been described as a "significant find". An
autopsy and genetic tests are now being carried out to
determine more about the specimen. Coelacanths
provide researchers with a window into thepast;their
fossil record dates back 350 million years."
The Archaeopteryx fossil was herald by
evolutionists as a significanttransitional missing
link. The fossil was discovered in a limestone
quarry in southern Germanyin 1861 and has
been debated ever since.
The dinosaur creature appears to be a reptile
with bird characteristics ofwings and feathers.It
had the skeleton of a small dinosaur with a tail,
fingers with claws on the leading edge of the
wing,and teeth in the jaws.
The owners ofthe property discovered sixfossils
of which only two had feathers.This
inconsistencysmells offraud from the beginning.
Upon close examination the feathers appear to
be identical to modern chicken feathers.Click
the picture to see an enlargement.
The Archaeopteryx fossils with feathers have
now been declared forgeries by scientists.
"Allegedly, thin layers of cementwere spread on
two fossils ofa chicken-size dinosaur,called
Compsognathus.Bird feathers were then
imprinted into the wet cement"according to Dr.
Walt Brown.
(...) This example would not have proven
evolution even if the feathers had not been
forgeries.Finding a few species with
characteristics similar to two other species does
not prove a link. There should be millions or
billions oftransitional links ifevolution were true,
not simplya few.
The Platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus),with
its duck bill and webbed feet, is a unique
Australian animal.It and the two species of
echidna are the only monotremes or egg-laying
mammals to be found on earth.
The marsupials (mammals with pouches,e.g.
kangaroos) and eutherians (placental mammals
that give birth to well-developed young,e.g.
humans) both give birth to live young.
The monotremes have lower body temperatures
than other mammals and have legs which
extend out, then vertically below them. These
features,together with their egg-laying ability,
are more like that of a lizard than a mammal.
Platypus are readily identified by their
streamlined body,webbed feet, broad tail, and
characteristic muzzle or bill which is soft and
pliable.
The Platypus males have spurs on their hind
feet that deliver a poisonous venom like a snake.
A Platypus sting is powerful enough to make
people sick and kill a dog.
The Platypus of Australia has characteristics of
many species butcertainlyis not the missing link

9. to all of them.In fact, it is not a link to any of
them.The Platypus has made a joke of Charles
Darwin's theory of evolution and his unproven
theory of natural selection.
April 6. 2006 - Tiktaalik is the latest fossil gap
evolutionary fraud;
Scientists fraudulentlyclaim a newly-discovered
fish is the second bridge fossil gap between sea
and land creatures.The scientists have
apparentlyforgotten that the firstfossil gap,
Archaeopteryx, shown above was also a fraud.
Tiktaalik therefore becomes fossil gap fraud
number 2.
"Called 'Tiktaalik' by scientists, the fish lived in
shallow, swampy waters. Most remarkably, the
creature, which was less than 3 feet long, had the
body of a fish but thejaws, ribs, and limb-like fins
seen in theearliest land mammals."
Tiktaalik fossil
The claim that the stubbylittle fossil fins are
"limb-like"is a real hoot. The fish doesn'teven
have fins as large as expected for its size. The
scientists are claiming the fish walked around on
the ground out of water and breathed air. This is
pure make-believe speculation.No evidence
exists that the fish is anything more than just
another species.
The excitementabout the Tiktaalik fossil is
puzzling. Modern-day seals have fins and
waddle around on the ground.Modern-day
catfish have fins and walk around on the ground.
Catfish can live out of water for a long time.
Tiktaalik does not provide any supportfor
evolution.
Evolutionists are now claiming thata dolphin
captured with two little extra fins near the tail is
proof that dolphins evolved from four-footed
animals related to the dog.
"Experts believe that the dolphin's ancestor was a
dog-like creature which roamed the earth many
millions of years ago. And now the extraordinary
discovery of a bottlenosed dolphin with an extra set
of flippers has provided living proof of the theory. At
first glance it looks like any other of its kind. But
closer inspection reveals a rogue set of rear fins. Each
the sizeof a human hand, thefins are thought to be
the remains of a pair of hind legs, adding to evidence
that dolphins once walked on all fours."
This is utter nonsense!
Scientific Fact No. 3 - Missing Inferior
Evolutionary Branches
The Theory of Evolution states that minute
improvements in an individual within a species
increases the likelihood ofsurvival of the
offspring.These small steps ofimprovements
continue for countless years until the individuals
are changed to such a large extent that a new
species has appeared.
This progression is an uninterrupted branch of
the "evolutionary tree." These lines of
progression can be seen in any biology text
book for manyspecies,including mankind.They
almostlook believable...
The siblings ofan individual on the uninterrupted
branch may fail to develop the minute
improvementand mayeven suffer from an
inferior evolutionary change.Each of these
individuals represents a new branch on the tree
that is moving away from the uninterrupted
branch.
Let us say we have 100,000 coexisting
individuals in a species such as a horse.Only a
few of these individuals will begin new branches
that will eventually become a new species such
as a Zebra. The other 99,999 individuals may
each begin a neutral or inferior branch that may
continue for millions ofyears but will eventually
stop,because the lastindividual on the branch
fails to produce an offspring.
The odds that the branch will stop producing
offspring is increased when the minute
evolutionary changes are inferior.The theory of

10. survival of the fittest or natural selection also
works in reverse to produce death to the branch
where the changes are inferior.The branch
stops.This partof the tree is dead.
We see in Scientific Fact No. 2 above that the
missing intermediaryindividuals in the branch of
the evolutionary tree presenta serious problem
for the Theory of Evolution. One superior
individual of the 100,000 is missing,butnow we
have an even more serious defectin the theory.
Where are the 99,999 inferior branches? How
could 99,999 branches go missing?
Actually, the fossil record shows thateverything
is missing.No individuals ofthe species existed.
None.Most layers of the earth's crust are
completelydevoid of all life, but then a layer will
appear that is teaming with an absolute
abundance ofseparate species,each containing
millions ofindividuals.
This hypothesis ofthe "missing inferior
evolutionary branches"was developed and
posted here by the author, Kent R. Rieske,on
March 21, 2008.Thousands ofbiology
professors atuniversities around the world,
including Darwin,have completelymissed this
serious deficiencyin the fossil record,because
they have only been searching for the superior
evolutionary branches,notthe inferior branches.
Where are the fossils ofhorses with weak bones
that fractured early in life and thereby prevented
an offspring from continuing the branch? They
don't exist, but they should ifthe Theory of
Evolution was true. In fact, the fossil record
should be full of dead branches, which is not.
The fossil record simplyshows individual
species thathave become extinct.
Scientific Fact No. 4 - Single Cell Complexity
Proves Evolution is Wrong
Scientists a century ago believed the smallest
single living cell was a simple life form. The
theory developed that perhaps lightning struck a
pond of water, causing several molecules to
combine in a random way, which by chance
resulted in a living cell. The cell then divided and
evolved into higher life forms.
This view is now proven to be immature to the
degree of being ridiculous.The mostmodern
laboratory is unable to create a living cell. In fact,
scientists have been unable to create a single
left-hand protein molecule as found in all
animals.The Theory of Evolution claims that
organic life was created from inorganic matter.
That is impossible.The top scientists in the
world with unlimited laboratoryresources cannot
change inorganic matter into a single organic
living cell.
The smallestliving cell has the complexity of a
Boeing 747 jumbo jetairplane.The components
of the smallestliving cell have the obvious
arrangementshowing intelligentdesign,justas
the Boeing 747 did not appear from random
parts stacked near each other in a junk yard.
The minimal cell contains more than 60,000
proteins of100 differentconfigurations.
The smallestsingle-cell creature has millions of
atoms forming millions ofmolecules thatmust
each be arranged in an exact pattern to provide
the required functions.The cell has an energy-
producing system,a protective housing,a
security system to let molecules into and outof
the housing,a reproductive system,and a
central control system.This complexityrequired
an intelligentdesign.It is much too complexto
happen by chance.
Evolution: A Theory in Crisis byMichael Denton
page 263;
The odds that the correct proteins could
somehow come together in a functional
configuration to make a living cell are so high
that it will never happen.The conceptthat
anything can be accomplished bychance given
enough time is false. (...)
Darwin's "Tree of Life"
Charles Darwin made a sketch in his notebook
in aboutJuly 1837 that has come to be known
as the Tree of Life. Darwin developed the Tree
of Life theory, claiming thatsome species were
lower in the branches ofthe tree and evolved
into the upper branches.He selected species
that looked similar to each other and placed

11. them together, like placing the zebra below the
horse.
Charles Darwin knew nothing aboutDNA, the
true scientific key to life. He had no concept
whatsoever regarding the complexity of DNA.
Life did not originate by the accidental sticking
together of a few molecules as Darwin taught.
Darwin did not know that the key to a person's
identity (DNA) is locked solid in every cell of the
body. The DNA does not change because of
external adaptation to the environmentas taught
by Darwin and still falselytaught in universities
by biologyprofessors.
The DNA changes onlywhen an egg and sperm
are joined to form a new DNA with
chromosomes coming from the male and female
donors.
The DNA of the baby is strictly controlled by the
parents'chromosomes.It cannotbe changed by
external environmental influences either.The
DNA of all life forms,including plants and trees,
absolutelydestroys Darwin's Theoryof Evolution
by Natural Selection.Environmental influence
does notchange the DNA in plants,animals or
humans.
Scientists have now solidlyproven that 80% of
the life forms in Darwin's Tree of Life have DNA
much differentfrom the adjacentlower DNA and
could not have evolved from the predecessor.
Some animals have DNA sequences thatare
identical to sequences in plantDNA, but they
obviouslycould not be related according to the
Theory of Evolution.
IntelligentDesign can be Seen in the Smallest
Bacteria and the LargestGalaxy
The scientific studyof complexbiological
structures has made enormous strides in
revealing Intelligentdesign in nature.One
example is the motor and propeller propulsion
system,called a bacterial flagellum,found in
many bacteria,including the common E.coli.
The propulsion system ofthe bacteria has 40
moving parts made from protein molecules,
including a motor,rotor, stator, drive shaft,
bushings,universal joint,and flexible propeller.
The motor is powered by ions and can rotate at
up to 100,000 rpm.It can reverse direction in
only 1/4 of a revolution and has an automatic
feedback control mechanism.The size is
1/100,000 of an inch (1/4,000 mm) in width,
much too small to see with the human eye. One
cannotdeny the obvious conclusion thatthis
system has an IntelligentDesigner.
Molecular Motors in Bacterium - University of
Michigan;
"The ATP Synthasemotor has the classic stator and
rotor structurefamiliar in man-made motors. It spans
a cellular membrane which admits protons (H+) one
at a time. For each proton, themotor turns once,
adding a phosphateto adenosine di-phosphateand
converting it to adenosine tri-phosphate, theuniversal
fuel source of cells."
Molecular Motor in Algae Cells Work Together -
Science Daily - February 25, 2009;
Scientific Fact No. 5 - Human Egg and Sperm
Prove Evolution is Wrong
The evolutionistignores the problem
surrounding the human female egg and the male
sperm in the evolutionary theory. The human
female like other mammals has XX sex
chromosomes,and the male has XY sex
chromosomes.The female egg contains the X-
chromosome,and the male sperm contains
either an X-chromosome for the reproduction of
a female or a Y-chromosome for the
reproduction ofa male.
The female eggs all develop within the ovaries
while she is a baby (fetus) within her mother's
womb.Evolutionists claim environmental factors
cause small changes in the offspring in the
evolutionary chain.However, the environmental
experience of the female cannotchange the
chromosomes within her eggs and cannothave
any effect upon her offspring.Her body cannot
go into the eggs contained within her ovaries at
her birth to make an intelligentgenetic change.
Females cannotbe a part of the evolutionary
theory for these reasons.
The male sperm are created very differently from
the female egg.The sperm are created in the
testes of a male on a daily basis.This shorttime
period between the creation of the sperm and
conception within the female precludes any
possibilitythat the male can be a part of the
evolutionary process.
A harsh winter,or some other environmental
condition does notaffect the testes in any way
that would alter the chromosomes in the sperm.
Therefore, the male could notpossiblycontribute
to evolutionary change caused by the
environment.This fact applies to humans as well
as all other mammals.
There are no ways possible whereby
environmental adaptation could occur through
the male partof the chromosome.Neither is
there any scientific evidence that environmental
experiences change the genetic code within the

12. sperm.Males cannotbe a part of the
evolutionary process for these reasons.These
scientific facts prove evolution of the human
species caused byenvironmental adaptation or
any other reason is impossible.
*** *** ***
(N/A In my opinion,there is not enough evidence
to supportthe author's conclusion regarding
"Scientific Fact No. 5." Based on my knowledge,
the DNA, which is the software of all living
things,can bring improvements to a species,
though I agree that it cannot change it into an
entirely different one.The DNA is also
responsible for our appearance,otherwise we
would all look the same.
The fact that the DNA works as a software,
making humans - for example - better adapted to
the environment,can be easilyproven.
Those who walk bare foot develop extra layers
of skin on their soles,or those who work the land
with their hands,develop extra layers of skin on
their palms.Increased resistance to cold can be
observed in the descendants ofthe nomadic
tribes,such as gypsies,even though they are no
longer living in harsh conditions.
In conclusion,based on my
knowledge, improvements are to be expected,
but never radical mutations which would result
into an entirely different species).
*** *** ***
Scientific Fact No. 6 - DNA Error Checking
Proves Evolution is Wrong
The scientific fact that DNA replication,including
a built-in error checking method and a DNA
repair process,proves the evolutionary theory is
wrong.The fact is,any attemptby the DNA to
change is stopped and reversed.
Chromosomes,Chromatin,DNAReplication and
Repair;
"Replication also contains built-in error checking.
The frequency of errors is about 1 per 100
million bonds (1 x 10-8).Over the entire human
genome,thatworks out to roughly 30 errors
every single time the genome replicates.BUT!
There are really only around three errors per
replication because ofDNA repair. If a repair
enzyme finds a mistake,itcan fix it, and it can
tell which strand is wrong because itcan tell
which strand is the newly synthesized strand by
at the extent of cytosine methylation.As DNAs
exist in cells,manyof the cytosines have a
methyl group added to them by enzymes called
methylases.A new DNA will have relatively few
methylated cytosines because ithas notbeen
around long enough to have picked up that
many methyl groups."
"Without DNA repair there can be some major
problems.Xeroderma pigmentosum is a serious
ailmentcaused bymutations in the gene for
DNA repair.People with xp develop many skin
tumors and other problems because ofthe
number oferrors in their DNA."
Mutation, Mutagens,and DNA Repair Outline;
Mutations (DNA replication errors) are the result
of DNA that is replicated with damage that
passes on to the offspring.Mutations are very
rare because ofDNA checking and repair.
However, one in every ten million duplications of
a DNA molecule can resultin a mutation (error).
The mutation changes are random,
unpredictable errors thatcause crippling
diseases,loss offunction and the destruction of
the hostperson or animal.Mutations destroythe
species.Theydo not improve the species.
Mutations never lead to a new species as falsely
claimed by evolutionists.
Proceedings ofthe National Academy of
Sciences;
Evolutionists believe in the "mutation theory" for
the origin of the many species.(...) They believe
that the "time god"makes mistake after mistake
after mistake until VOILA -- we have a
hummingbird thatcan fly backwards.
They claim that multiple mutation mistakes
eventually led to humans with color vision that
can focus at different lengths and two eyes that
are coordinated by the brain in order to judge
distances.
Scientific Fact No. 7 - Chaos From Organization
Proves Evolution is Wrong
The second law of thermodynamics proves that
organization cannotflow from chaos.Complex
live organisms cannotrearrange themselves into
an organism ofa higher form as claimed by
evolutionists.This is scientificallybackwards
according to the second law of thermodynamics,
which has never been proven wrong.
The universe is slowing down to a lower state,
not higher.The genes ofplants,insects,
animals,and humans are continuallybecoming
defective, not improving.Species are becoming
extinct, not evolving. Order will always move
naturally towards disorder or chaos.
Quoting from the book,Evolution and Human
Destiny, by Kohler,
"One of the most fundamental maxims of the physical
sciences is the trend toward greater randomness - the
fact that, on the average, things will get into disorder
rather than into order if left to themselves. This is

13. essentially thestatement that is embodied in the
Second Law of Thermodynamics."
This scientific law actually refutes and
contradicts the Theory of Evolution in its entirety.
Scientific Fact No. 8 - Chromosome Count
Proves Evolution is Wrong
There is no scientific evidence that a species
can change the number of chromosomes within
the DNA. The chromosome countwithin each
species is fixed.This is the reason a male from
one species cannotmate successfullywith a
female of another species.Man could not evolve
from a monkey.
Each species is locked into its chromosome
count that cannotbe changed.If an animal
developed an extra chromosome or losta
chromosome because ofsome deformity,it
could not successfullymate.The defect could
not be passed along to the next generation.
Evolving a new species is scientifically
impossible.
(For example) a dog has only 22 chromosomes,
whereas a monkeyhas 54 and a cat has 38.
Half of the total number ofchromosomes are
contained in the female reproductive cells and
half are contained in the male,so the exact total
number is broughttogether in the offspring.
Humans have 46 chromosomes.This
chromosome countis a steadyfactor. This
determines whatis called the "fixity of species"
because the chromosome countdoesn'tvary.
People always give birth to people.Dogs always
give birth to dogs,etc. The genes can produce
variety within the species butcannotresultin a
different species.(N/A Exactly my pointbellow
"Fact No. 5").
Genes allow for people to be short, tall, fat, thin,
blond,brunette, etc., but they are still all human
beings.The chromosomes make crossing ofthe
species an un-crossable barrier.This certainly
would hinder any evolution. Dogs cannotbreed
with cats.This fact stops evolution dead in its
tracks.
Sometimes two species are close enough to
crossbreed,butthe offspring are usuallysterile.
This is the case when horses and donkeys
crossbreed.A male donkey (jackass) and a
female horse (mare) will produce a mule.
Farmers often preferred mules as work animals
prior to the developmentofthe farm tractor.
A hinny is the offspring of a female donkey
(jenny) and a male horse (stallion).The hinny
and mule usuallycannotproduce offspring.
These animals show thatevolution is not
possible.
Scientific Fact No. 9 - Origin of Matter and Stars
Proves Evolution is Wrong
Evolutionists justthrow up their hands atthe
question ofthe origin of matter because they
know something cannotevolve from nothing.
They stick their heads in the sand and ignore the
problem.The fact that matter exists in
outrageouslylarge quantities simplyproves
evolution is wrong. The "Big Bang Theory"
doesn'tsolve the problem either.Matter and
energy have to come from somewhere.
"We know that matter can be created out of energy,
and energy can be created out of matter. This doesn't
resolve thedilemma because we must also know
where the original energy came from." - Why the Big
Bang is a fizzleand stars cannot evolve out of gas;
By Kent R. Rieske, Biblelife;
DISCLAIMER
by Alexander Light
The above is an excerpt of a larger article
promoting creationism (the religious beliefthat
life, the Earth, and the universe are the creation
of a supernatural being),butwithoutbringing
any kind of evidence to supportit.
The author brings solid scientific arguments to
disprove the "Theory of Evolution" as it is today,
but disproving itdoes not implicitlyprove the
biblical "Creation Story" is correct. In fact, there
are - at least - justas many arguments to
disprove manyof the biblical stories.
The author, Mr. Rieske,is also stating thatthere
is no evidence whatsoever to support
extraterrestrial life, and presents this statement
as further evidence that the Biblical stories are
correct.
Even though from a scientific pointof view there
is yet no official proof to attest the existence of
advanced extraterrestrial life elsewhere in the
Multiverse, even the mostconservative scientific
estimates saythere should be at leasttens or
hundreds ofintelligentcivilizations within our
own galaxy.
Personally,I'm sure that somewhere in the near
future the existence of intelligentlife "out there"
will be disclosed to the public.
Also, there are plenty of interesting cases of
human-alien contactthat should have been
openly investigated by the main stream scientific

14. communities - which did nothappen.
For example,the case of Giovana, an Italian
woman who was allegedlykidnapped by the so
called "grays" multiple times since she was a
child.Her claims were supported by the
testimonies ofher family, medical accounts,
pictures and videos of flying saucers,an alien
implantand even an aborted human-alien hybrid
fetus. (Video)
All those who involuntarilybecame involved in
her case,including medical doctors,vowed for
the veracity of her claims,yet no official
investigation was held.
How can we claim to be searching for intelligent
life "out there" and at the same time ignore a
huge case "in here"? Isn't this evidence of a
cover-up?
And this is not a lone case.In fact, anonymous
polls (anonymous for obvious reasons) suggest
that there mightbe hundreds ofthousands of
alien abductees worldwide.
Why isn't there an - open - official investigation
taking place? If there is nothing to hide,then
why is the governmentdoing its bestto suppress
this kind of information,instead ofthe opposite?
Justas importantis the historical evidence
supporting the hypothesis ofhuman-alien
contact in the past.Based on evidence, it is
possible thatall of the world's religions have
been founded as a resultof misunderstood alien
contact. Today's so called "cargo cults"are
further evidence that it CAN happen.
Though some ofthe evidence can be easily
ignored or dismissed byscience (for example,
crop circles are considered to be hoaxes by the
main stream scientific communities,even though
there arescientists who broughtsolid evidence
proving otherwise),there is still plenty of
evidence that there is more to the story that we
are being told.
Lastly, the hypothesis thatvastly more intelligent
life forms are seeding planets with life and
graduallyimproving their creation, is a very
logical assumption to make,in my opinion.If you
think aboutit, even our very young species is
planning to make Mars habitable in the near
future.
Before concluding this article,I want to thank Mr.
Kent R. Rieske for his outstanding work and all
the scientific data gathered to disprove the
"Theory of Evolution" (as it is today), which was
imagined and promoted bythe high ranking
Freemasons as a disinformation weapon and
control tool.
As long as we are not allowed to know our true
history, the Secret Societies are in control. As
long as the "Theory of Evolution" (as it is today)
stands,we are nothing else than slightlymore
evolved "working apes."
3. Ver el video “Desenmascarando la falsa teoría de Darwin”
colgado en el blog y comentarlo