Summary Risk Report

Summary Risk Report
Plan Summary
Title Copy of ExampleRegister-DownstreamOG.plan
File name C:UsersburivoyYandexDiskRisksCopy of ExampleRegister-DownstreamOG.plan
Plan finish date 11 Mar 09 Tasks with no progress 33
Plan remaining duration 1247 In progress tasks 0
Normal tasks 26 Completed tasks 0
Summary tasks 5 Total tasks 33
Milestone tasks 2 Resource assignments 44
Hammock tasks 0 Budget cost $67,975,229
Monitor tasks 0 Remaining cost $73,654,301
Calendars 4 Actual cost $0
Links 37 Total cost $73,654,301
Resources 10

Risk Inputs
Task ID: A120 Remaining Duration: 18
Task Description: Tap well-head Remaining Cost: $54
Duration Uncertainty
Distribution Triangle
Minimum 16
Most Likely 18
Maximum 20
Notes
Task Description: Gas separator Remaining Cost: $1,457,330
Minimum 37
Most Likely 42
Maximum 46
Notes
Task Description: FWKO Tank Remaining Cost: $1,751,575
Minimum 100
Most Likely 105
Maximum 137
Notes
Task Description: Main water tank Remaining Cost: $751,020

Minimum 76
Most Likely 85
Maximum 94
Notes
Task Description: Cooling ponds Remaining Cost: $676,750
Minimum 45
Most Likely 50
Maximum 55
Notes
Task Description: Production tanks Remaining Cost: $4,803,500
Minimum 133
Most Likely 140
Maximum 182
Notes
Task Description: Production pumps Remaining Cost: $3,131,595
Minimum 129
Most Likely 145
Maximum 160
Notes

Task Description: Pumpstation 5 Remaining Cost: $4,904,970
Minimum 135
Most Likely 142
Maximum 185
Notes
Task Description: Project completion Remaining Cost: $0
Task Description: Project Start Remaining Cost: $0
Task Description: Level production tanks Remaining Cost: $260
Minimum 23
Most Likely 26
Maximum 31
Notes
Task Description: Pre-production Remaining Cost: $4,250,114
Task Description: High pressure stack Remaining Cost: $1,501,150

Minimum 44
Most Likely 46
Maximum 60
Notes
Task Description: Auxilary pumps Remaining Cost: $2,002,000
Minimum 71
Most Likely 80
Maximum 88
Notes
Task Description: Water treatment facility Remaining Cost: $2,502,610
Minimum 138
Most Likely 145
Maximum 189
Notes
Task Description: Secondary water tank Remaining Cost: $346,585
Minimum 67
Most Likely 71
Maximum 92
Notes

Task Description: Low pressure stack Remaining Cost: $1,150,855
Minimum 51
Most Likely 57
Maximum 68
Notes
Task Description: Depressurizing station Remaining Cost: $6,001,310
Minimum 118
Most Likely 131
Maximum 157
Notes
Task Description: Main pipline to terminal Remaining Cost: $17,013,600
Minimum 121
Most Likely 136
Maximum 150
Notes
Task Description: Field production facility tests Remaining Cost: $450
Minimum 27
Most Likely 30
Notes

Maximum 36
Task Description: Open pipeline to terminal Remaining Cost: $675
Minimum 8
Most Likely 9
Maximum 10
Notes
Task Description: Level PS1 tanks Remaining Cost: $152
Minimum 17
Most Likely 19
Maximum 21
Notes
Task Description: Construct Field Production Facility Remaining Cost: $4,109,335
Task Description: Water Flow Remaining Cost: $8,030,540
Task Description: Crude Flow Remaining Cost: $57,262,775

Task Description: Production Remaining Cost: $1,537
Minimum 180
Most Likely 202
Maximum 222
Notes
Minimum 181
Most Likely 201
Maximum 241
Notes
Minimum 187
Most Likely 197
Maximum 256
Notes

Minimum 176
Most Likely 195
Maximum 234
Notes
Task Description: Vendor installation Remaining Cost: $60
Minimum 4
Most Likely 5
Maximum 6
Notes
Task Description: Expedite delivery Remaining Cost: $250,000
Minimum 11
Most Likely 12
Maximum 13
Notes
Task Description:
Source suitable uninterruptible power
generators
Remaining Cost: $4,000,000
Minimum 14
Most Likely 15
Maximum 18
Notes

Templated Quick Risk
Field Value Tasks Distribution Min Likely Max Correlation Description
Uncertainty = L 12 Triangle 89% 100% 110% none
Uncertainty = M 7 Triangle 90% 100% 120% none
Uncertainty = H 7 Triangle 95% 100% 130% none
Probabilistic Calendars
Calendar: WeatherDelay
From To Apply to Block size (days) Non working probability
31/Oct/05 01/Oct/05 Every year 7 15%
30/Nov/05 01/Nov/05 Every year 7 15%
31/Dec/05 01/Dec/05 Every year 7 20%
31/Jan/06 01/Jan/06 Every year 7 30%
28/Feb/06 01/Feb/06 Every year 7 30%
31/Mar/06 01/Mar/06 Every year 7 25%
30/Apr/06 01/Apr/06 Every year 7 15%
31/May/06 01/May/06 Every year 7 10%
30/Jun/06 01/Jun/06 Every year 7 5%
31/Jul/06 01/Jul/06 Every year 7 5%
31/Aug/06 01/Aug/06 Every year 7 10%
30/Sep/06 01/Sep/06 Every year 7 10%
Resources
No Data

Risk Outputs
Project Finish Distribution Graph
Title Value
Minimum 09 Feb 09
Maximum 13 Jul 09
Mean 27 Apr 09
Median 28 Apr 09
Mode 07 May 09
Max Hits 97
Std Deviation 27.59
Variance 761.5
Skewness -0.051

Kurtosis 2.599
Bar Width: week

Project Cost Distribution Graph
Title Value
Minimum $73,653,005
Maximum $73,660,741
Mean $73,656,672
Median $73,656,639
Mode $73,656,750
Max Hits 153
Std Deviation 1,319
Variance 1,739,116
Skewness 0.115
Kurtosis 2.878
Bar Width: $500

Project NPV Distribution Graph
Not Checked
Project IRR Distribution Graph
Not Checked
Project Duration Sensitivity Tornado Graph
The duration sensitivity of a task is a measure of the correlation between its duration and the
duration (or dates) of the project (or a key task or summary).

Project Cost Sensitivity Tornado Graph
The cost sensitivity of a task is a measure of the correlation between its cost and the cost of the
project (or a key task or summary).

Project SSI Tornado Graph
The schedule sensitivity index of a task is calculated by multiplying its criticality index by the ratio of
its variance against the variance of the project (or key task).

Project Criticality Tornado Graph
The criticality index of a task is the proportion of the iterations in which it was critical.

Project Cruciality Tornado Graph
The cruciality of a task is calculated by multiplying its duration sensitivity by its criticality index.

Risk Register
Risk Register Summary
Total Risks 10
Proposed Risks 0
Open Risks 10
High 4
Medium 3
Low 2
Negligible 1
Impacted (Closed) Risks 0
Managed (Closed) Risks 0
Rejected (Closed) Risks 0
Threats 9
Opportunities 1
Risk Scoring
Probability Scale
Very Low Low Medium High Very High
Up to 10% 10% to 35% 35% to 60% 60% to 75% 75% or higher
Impact Scales and Types
Schedule* Up to 30 30 to 60 60 to 90 90 to 180 180 or higher
Cost* Up to $500,000 $500,000 to $1,000,000 $1,000,000 to $1,500,000 $1,500,000 to $2,500,000 $2,500,000 or higher
Performance*
Failure to meet a minor
acceptance criteria
Failure to meet more than one
minor acceptance criteria
Shortfall in meeting
acceptance criteria
Significant shortfall in meeting
acceptance criteria
Failure to meet acceptance
criteria
* means impact is used in scoring
Probability and Impact Scoring (PID)
Risk Score is based on: Highest Impact
Impact

Very High 5 9 18 36 72
High 4 7 14 28 56
Medium 3 5 10 20 40
Low 2 3 6 12 24
Very Low 1 1 2 4 8
Key
Up to 7 7 to 23 23 or higher
Risk Matrix
Pre-Mitigation
Very High
10 - Reuse previous design
work
High
5 - Power outtage,
3 - Attack on pipeline
4 - Key resource
unavailable
Medium
7 - Rework required for
assembly and integration
Low 8 - Testing fails 9 - Design changes
1 - Poor understanding and
detail in specification
Very Low
2 - Auxilary pump system
failure

Post-Mitigation
Very High
High 5 - Power outtage 9 - Design changes
10 - Reuse previous design
work
Medium
Low 8 - Testing fails 3 - Attack on pipeline
Very Low
4 - Key resource
unavailable,
1 - Poor understanding and
detail in specification
Risks
ID Title
4 Key resource unavailable
Status Owner
Open DP
RBS Start Date End Date Exposure
Project Level Impact.Crude Flow 07 Jan 2006 07 Jan 2006 $0
Cause Effect
Due to other project commitments. Delay could occur on completion of key activities.
Description
Key resources may be unavailable.

Pre-mitigation Score 56 High
Post-mitigation Score 1 Low
Qualitative Quantitative
Pre-
mitigation
H 67%
Post-
mitigation
VL 5%
Qualitative
Schedule Pre-mitigation L
Post-mitigation L
Cost Pre-mitigation L
Post-mitigation L
Performance Pre-mitigation VH
Post-mitigation L
Mitigation Title: Change resource assignment policy
Description Source additional specialists
Responsibility DP Status Proposed Mitigated Cost $4,500,000 Actual Cost $0
TaskID Task Description undefined
Start Date 12 Oct 2005 Finish Date 12 Oct 2005 Target Start Date 12 Dec 2005 Target Finish Date 12 Dec 2005
Description Overbook key resources
Responsibility DP Status Proposed Mitigated Cost $3,250,000 Actual Cost $0
Start Date 12 Oct 2005 Finish Date 12 Oct 2005 Target Start Date 03 Jan 2006 Target Finish Date 03 Jan 2006
Description Increase contract incentive
Responsibility DP Status Proposed Mitigated Cost $800,000 Actual Cost $0
Risk Plan: Pre-mitigation
Impacting Task: A340 - Production
Schedule Triangle 10 15 20
Cost Triangle $166,667 $250,000 $333,333
Impacting Task: A330 - Main pipline to terminal
Cost Triangle $166,667 $250,000 $333,333
Impacting Task: A260 - Production pumps
Cost Triangle $166,667 $250,000 $333,333

Risk Plan: Post-mitigation
Impacting Task: A340 - Production
Cost Triangle $166,667 $250,000 $333,333
Cost Triangle $166,667 $250,000 $333,333
Cost Triangle $166,667 $250,000 $333,333

ID Title
10 Reuse previous design work
Status Owner
Open TS
Project Level Impact.Gas
separation
12 Oct 2005 12 Oct 2005 $0
Cause Effect
Due to the similar nature of the design. Saving time and money during the initial design phase.
Description
It may be possible to use designs created for previous project.
Post-mitigation Score 28 High
Pre-
mitigation
VH 87%
Post-
mitigation
H 67%
Qualitative
Schedule Pre-mitigation M
Post-mitigation M
Cost Pre-mitigation H
Post-mitigation H
Performance Pre-mitigation N
Post-mitigation N
Cost Triangle $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000
Cost Triangle $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000

ID Title
5 Power outtage
Status Owner
Open TR
Project Level Impact 05 Jan 2006 05 Jan 2006 $0
Cause Effect
Government power plant failure. Power dependent activities will be delayed.
Description
It may be necessary to find an alternative or supplemental power source.
Pre-
mitigation
H 67%
Post-
mitigation
H 67%
Qualitative
Schedule Pre-mitigation H
Post-mitigation VL
Cost Pre-mitigation H
Post-mitigation N
Performance Pre-mitigation VL
Post-mitigation N
Mitigation Title: Source alternative power supply
Description Source suitable uninterruptible power generators
Responsibility TR Status Planned Mitigated Cost $4,000,000 Actual Cost $0
TaskID A420 Task Description Source suitable uninterruptible power generators
Start Date 12 Oct 2005 Finish Date 01 Nov 2005 Target Start Date 30 Dec 1899 Target Finish Date 30 Dec 1899
Description Expedite delivery
Responsibility TR Status Planned Mitigated Cost $250,000 Actual Cost $0
TaskID A410 Task Description Expedite delivery
Start Date 02 Nov 2005 Finish Date 17 Nov 2005 Target Start Date 30 Dec 1899 Target Finish Date 30 Dec 1899
Description Vendor fees for travel and installation
Responsibility TR Status Planned Mitigated Cost $60 Actual Cost $0
TaskID A400 Task Description Vendor installation
Start Date 18 Nov 2005 Finish Date 24 Nov 2005 Target Start Date 30 Dec 1899 Target Finish Date 30 Dec 1899

Impacting Task: A180 - FWKO Tank
Cost Triangle $150,000 $200,000 $250,000
Impacting Task: A190 - Main water tank
Cost Triangle $150,000 $200,000 $250,000
Impacting Task: A200 - Secondary water tank
Cost Triangle $150,000 $200,000 $250,000
Impacting Task: A210 - Auxilary pumps
Cost Triangle $150,000 $200,000 $250,000
Impacting Task: A220 - Water treatment facility
Cost Triangle $150,000 $200,000 $250,000
Cost Triangle $150,000 $200,000 $250,000
Impacting Task: A250 - Production tanks
Cost Triangle $150,000 $200,000 $250,000
Impacting Task: A350 - Field production facility tests
Cost Triangle $150,000 $200,000 $250,000
Impacting Task: A360 - Level production tanks
Cost Triangle $150,000 $200,000 $250,000
Impacting Task: A370 - Level PS1 tanks
Cost Triangle $150,000 $200,000 $250,000

Cost Triangle $0 $0 $0
Impacting Task: A190 - Main water tank
Impacting Task: A200 - Secondary water tank

ID Title
3 Attack on pipeline
Status Owner
Open DP
Project Level Impact.Production 15 Nov 2005 15 Nov 2005 $0
Cause Effect
Due to lack of stability in the region local guerillas may attack the pipeline. Delay in bringing the field production facility online.
Description
Local guerilla groups have attacked other pipelines in the past. As a sort of ransome, they will repeatedly threaten to attack unless paid-off by the government or
the foriegn contractors.
Post-mitigation Score 12 Medium
Pre-
mitigation
H 67%
Post-
mitigation
L 22%
Qualitative
Post-mitigation M
Cost Pre-mitigation M
Post-mitigation L
Performance Pre-mitigation H
Post-mitigation H
Mitigation Title: Source extra security with local government
Description Use standard form of contract
Start Date 12 Oct 2005 Finish Date 12 Oct 2005 Target Start Date 01 Nov 2005 Target Finish Date 01 Nov 2005
Description Pre contract negotiation
Impacting Task: A380 - Open pipeline to terminal

Cost Triangle $500,000 $625,000 $750,000
Cost Triangle $500,000 $625,000 $750,000
Impacting Task: A380 - Open pipeline to terminal
Cost Triangle $250,000 $375,000 $500,000
Cost Triangle $250,000 $375,000 $500,000

ID Title
1 Poor understanding and detail in specification
Status Owner
Open TS
Project Level Impact.Crude Flow 01 Nov 2006 01 Nov 2006 $0
Cause Effect
Due to poor understanding and detail in the initial specification. Could delay the project schedule and increase cost.
Description
The design is more complex than expected.
Pre-mitigation Score 12 Medium
Pre-
mitigation
L 22%
Post-
mitigation
VL 5%
Qualitative
Schedule Pre-mitigation H
Post-mitigation L
Post-mitigation L
Performance Pre-mitigation VL
Post-mitigation VL
Mitigation Title: Introduce penalties for design changes
Description Include penalties for any design changes
Responsibility TS Status Proposed Mitigated Cost $10,000 Actual Cost $0
Description Use supported design methodologies
Responsibility TS Status Proposed Mitigated Cost $0 Actual Cost $0
Impacting Task: A270 - Pumpstation 1

Cost Triangle $142,857 $178,571 $214,286
Cost Triangle $142,857 $178,571 $214,286
Cost Triangle $142,857 $178,571 $214,286
Cost Triangle $142,857 $178,571 $214,286
Cost Triangle $142,857 $178,571 $214,286
Impacting Task: A320 - Depressurizing station
Cost Triangle $142,857 $178,571 $214,286
Cost Triangle $142,857 $178,571 $214,286
Cost Triangle $71,429 $107,143 $142,857
Cost Triangle $71,429 $107,143 $142,857
Cost Triangle $71,429 $107,143 $142,857

Cost Triangle $71,429 $107,143 $142,857
Cost Triangle $71,429 $107,143 $142,857
Impacting Task: A320 - Depressurizing station
Cost Triangle $71,429 $107,143 $142,857
Cost Triangle $71,429 $107,143 $142,857

ID Title
7 Rework required for assembly and integration
Status Owner
Open BJ
Project Level Impact 01 Nov 2006 01 Nov 2006 $0
Cause Effect
Due to incorrect tolerances in manufacturing. Which would delay the time taken to complete the assembly.
Description
The assembly may need to be reworked to allow a satisfactory integration of the components.
Post-mitigation Score 0 Negligible
Pre-
mitigation
M 47%
Post-
mitigation
N 0%
Qualitative
Post-mitigation M
Post-mitigation M
Performance Pre-mitigation L
Post-mitigation L
Mitigation Title: Check manufacturing tolerances
Description Check all manufacturing equipment can handle required tolerances
Responsibility BJ Status Proposed Mitigated Cost $200,000 Actual Cost $0
Description Communicate importance of tolerances to manufacturing
Responsibility BJ Status Proposed Mitigated Cost $0 Actual Cost $0
Impacting Task: A140 - High pressure stack

Cost Triangle $250,000 $312,500 $375,000
Impacting Task: A150 - Low pressure stack
Cost Triangle $250,000 $312,500 $375,000
Impacting Task: A160 - Gas separator
Cost Triangle $250,000 $312,500 $375,000
Cost Triangle $250,000 $312,500 $375,000
Cost Triangle $250,000 $312,500 $375,000
Cost Triangle $250,000 $312,500 $375,000
Cost Triangle $250,000 $312,500 $375,000
Cost Triangle $250,000 $312,500 $375,000

ID Title
2 Auxilary pump system failure
Status Owner
Open RB
Project Level Impact.Water Flow 02 Jan 2006 02 Jan 2006 $0
Cause Effect
Due to the novel nature of the auxilary pump system. Auxilary pump system would need to be modified.
Description
There may be a major failure of auxilary pump system.
Pre-
mitigation
VL 5%
Post-
mitigation
N 0%
Qualitative
Schedule Pre-mitigation VH
Post-mitigation VH
Cost Pre-mitigation VH
Post-mitigation VH
Performance Pre-mitigation VH
Post-mitigation VH
Mitigation Title: Improve initial specification
Description Spend more money on the initial specification
Responsibility RB Status Proposed Mitigated Cost $250,000 Actual Cost $0
Description Use off-the-shelf pump systems
Responsibility RB Status Proposed Mitigated Cost $500,000 Actual Cost $0

Cost Triangle $1,250,000 $1,875,000 $2,500,000
Cost Triangle $1,250,000 $1,875,000 $2,500,000
Cost Triangle $1,250,000 $1,875,000 $2,500,000
Cost Triangle $1,250,000 $1,875,000 $2,500,000

ID Title
9 Design changes
Status Owner
Open LM
Project Level Impact.Gas
separation
12 Oct 2005 12 Oct 2005 $0
Cause Effect
Due to client changing their mind. Which would delay the schedule.
Description
The design needs to be altered.
Pre-mitigation Score 6 Low
Post-mitigation Score 14 Medium
Pre-
mitigation
L 22%
Post-
mitigation
H 67%
Qualitative
Post-mitigation M
Post-mitigation M
Post-mitigation N
Cost Triangle $333,333 $416,667 $500,000
Cost Triangle $333,333 $416,667 $500,000
Cost Triangle $333,333 $416,667 $500,000

Cost Triangle $333,333 $416,667 $500,000
Cost Triangle $333,333 $416,667 $500,000
Cost Triangle $333,333 $416,667 $500,000

ID Title
8 Testing fails
Status Owner
Open LM
Project Level Impact.Production 12 Oct 2005 12 Oct 2005 $0
Cause Effect
Due to problems in design and fabrication. Rework would be required and retesting would need to take place.
Description
Testing fails to meet the clients performance criteria.
Pre-mitigation Score 3 Low
Pre-
mitigation
L 22%
Post-
mitigation
L 22%
Qualitative
Post-mitigation L
Cost Pre-mitigation L
Post-mitigation L
Post-mitigation N
Cost Triangle $166,667 $250,000 $333,333
Cost Triangle $166,667 $250,000 $333,333
Cost Triangle $166,667 $250,000 $333,333

Cost Triangle $166,667 $250,000 $333,333
Cost Triangle $166,667 $250,000 $333,333
Cost Triangle $166,667 $250,000 $333,333

ID Title
6 Fabrication contractor goes bust
Status Owner
Open TR
Project Level Impact 12 Oct 2005 12 Oct 2005 $0
Cause Effect
Due to poor business conditions in the current fabrication market.
A new fabrication company would need to be sourced causing delay to the
fabrication tasks.
Description
The fabrication contractor may go bust.
Pre-mitigation Score 0 Negligible
Pre-
mitigation
N 0%
Post-
mitigation
N 0%
Qualitative
Post-mitigation M
Post-mitigation M
Performance Pre-mitigation M
Post-mitigation M
Impacting Task: A170 - Water Flow
Cost Triangle $500,000 $625,000 $750,000
Impacting Task: A240 - Crude Flow
Cost Triangle $500,000 $625,000 $750,000
Impacting Task: A170 - Water Flow
Cost Triangle $500,000 $625,000 $750,000

Impacting Task: A240 - Crude Flow
Cost Triangle $500,000 $625,000 $750,000

13 Feb 06 28 Jun 07 09 Nov 08
Time
0
20,000,000
40,000,000
60,000,000
Cumulative
Resource Flow for Cost
Filter: Entire Plan
Mean P0

Analysis
Simulation: Latin Hypercu...
Iterations: 1000
Correlation
Pearson's 58.4%
Spearman's 57.7%
Highlighters
x-axis 50% (28 Apr 0...
y-axis 50% ($73,656...
Inside both li... 36%
Outside both l... 35%
1
% 3
%
17 Feb 09 28 May 09
Entire Plan: Finish
50%
$73,654,000
$73,656,000
$73,658,000
$73,660,000
EntirePlan:Cost
50%
DownstreamOG
Deterministic Point
Inside both limits
Outside both limits

Data
NPV of:
Entire Plan
Discount Rate: 0%
Analysis
Simulation: Latin Hypercube
Iterations: 1000
Convergence at mean
Mean Plan Finish Date:
Converged in 0 iterations
(variation < 1% over 100 iterations)
Mean Total Plan Cost:
Statistics
Minimum: $73,653,005
Maximum: $73,660,741
Mean: $73,656,672
Median: $73,656,639
Mode: $73,656,750
Max Hits: 153
Std Deviation: 1,319
Variance: 1,739,116
Skewness: 0.115
Kurtosis: 2.878
Bar Width: $500
Highlighters
20% $73,657,767
Deterministic 96%
50% $73,656,639
80% $73,655,501
$73,660,000
Distribution (start of interval)
0
50
100
150
Hits
0% $73,660,741
5% $73,658,881
10% $73,658,306
15% $73,658,044
20% $73,657,767
25% $73,657,572
30% $73,657,398
35% $73,657,166
40% $73,656,986
45% $73,656,818
50% $73,656,639
55% $73,656,497
60% $73,656,291
65% $73,656,151
70% $73,655,926
75% $73,655,752
80% $73,655,501
85% $73,655,336
90% $73,655,033
95% $73,654,514
100% $73,653,005
CumulativeFrequency
DownstreamOG
Entire Plan : NPV

Data
Cost of:
Entire Plan
Analysis
Iterations: 1000
Convergence at mean
Statistics
Minimum: $73,653,005
Maximum: $73,660,741
Mean: $73,656,672
Median: $73,656,639
Mode: $73,656,750
Max Hits: 153
Std Deviation: 1,319
Variance: 1,739,116
Skewness: 0.115
Kurtosis: 2.878
Bar Width: $500
Highlighters
50% $73,656,639
20% $73,655,501
Deterministic 4%
50% $73,656,639
80% $73,657,767
$73,660,000
0
50
100
150
Hits
0% $73,653,005
5% $73,654,502
10% $73,655,033
15% $73,655,334
20% $73,655,501
25% $73,655,752
30% $73,655,926
35% $73,656,151
40% $73,656,291
45% $73,656,497
50% $73,656,639
55% $73,656,818
60% $73,656,986
65% $73,657,166
70% $73,657,398
75% $73,657,572
80% $73,657,767
85% $73,658,044
90% $73,658,306
95% $73,658,881
100% $73,660,741
CumulativeFrequency
DownstreamOG
Entire Plan : Cost

Data
Duration of:
Entire Plan
Analysis
Simulation: Latin Hypercu...
Iterations: 1000
Convergence at mean
(variation < 1% over 100 iteratio...
(variation < 1% over 100 iteratio...
Statistics
Minimum: 1217
Maximum: 1371
Mean: 1294
Median: 1295
Mode: 1299
Max Hits: 103
Std Deviation: 27.59
Variance: 761.5
Skewness: -0.051
Kurtosis: 2.599
Bar Width: week
Highlighters
Deterministic 5%
50% 1295
80% 1317
0
50
100
Hits
0% 1217
5% 1248
10% 1259
15% 1263
20% 1269
25% 1274
30% 1277
35% 1282
40% 1288
45% 1290
50% 1295
55% 1298
60% 1302
65% 1305
70% 1310
75% 1315
80% 1317
85% 1324
90% 1330
95% 1338
100% 1371
CumulativeFrequency
DownstreamOG
Entire Plan : Duration

Data
Finish Date of:
Entire Plan
Analysis
Iterations: 1000
Convergence at mean
Statistics
Minimum: 09 Feb 09
Maximum: 13 Jul 09
Mean: 27 Apr 09
Median: 28 Apr 09
Mode: 07 May 09
Max Hits: 97
Std Deviation: 27.59
Variance: 761.5
Skewness: -0.051
Kurtosis: 2.599
Bar Width: week
Highlighters
20% 02 Apr 09
Deterministic 5%
50% 28 Apr 09
80% 20 May 09
17 Feb 09
0
50
100
Hits
0% 09 Feb 09
5% 12 Mar 09
10% 23 Mar 09
15% 27 Mar 09
20% 02 Apr 09
25% 07 Apr 09
30% 10 Apr 09
35% 15 Apr 09
40% 21 Apr 09
45% 23 Apr 09
50% 28 Apr 09
55% 01 May 09
60% 05 May 09
65% 08 May 09
70% 13 May 09
75% 18 May 09
80% 20 May 09
85% 27 May 09
90% 02 Jun 09
95% 10 Jun 09
100% 13 Jul 09
CumulativeFrequency
DownstreamOG
Entire Plan : Finish Date

Summary Risk Report

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Summary Risk Report

Similar to Summary Risk Report (20)

Summary Risk Report