U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 2
LESSON OBJECTIVES
UPON CONCLUSION, PARTICIPANTS SHOULD HAVE:
1. A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF SEISMIC STRUCTURAL RESPONSE IN TERMS OF
STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS
2. AN APPRECIATION THAT CODE-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN PROVISIONS ARE BASED ON
THE PRINCIPLES OF STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 3
Linear Single Degree of
Freedom Systems
PART I
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 4
STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS OF SDOF
SYSTEMS: TOPIC OUTLINE
• EQUATIONS OF MOTION FOR SDOF SYSTEMS
• STRUCTURAL FREQUENCY AND PERIOD OF VIBRATION
• BEHAVIOR UNDER DYNAMIC LOAD
• DYNAMIC AMPLIFICATION
• EFFECT OF DAMPING ON BEHAVIOR
• LINEAR ELASTIC RESPONSE SPECTRA
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 5
Mass
Stiffness
Damping
F t u t
( ), ( )
t
F(t)
t
u(t)
IDEALIZED SINGLE DEGREE
OF FREEDOM SYSTEM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 6
F t
( )
f t
I ( )
f t
D ( )
0 5
. ( )
f t
S
0 5
. ( )
f t
S
mu t c u t k u t F t
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
  
)
t
(
F
)
t
(
f
)
t
(
f
)
t
(
f S
D
I =
+
+
EQUATION OF DYNAMIC
EQUILIBRIUM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 7
MASS
• Includes all dead weight of structure
• May include some live load
• Has units of FORCE/ACCELERATION
INERTIAL
FORCE
ACCELERATION
1.0
M
PROPERTIES OF
STRUCTURAL MASS
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 8
DAMPING
• In absence of dampers, is called Natural Damping
• Usually represented by linear viscous dashpot
• Has units of FORCE/VELOCITY
DAMPING
FORCE
VELOCITY
1.0
C
PROPERTIES OF
STRUCTURAL DAMPING
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 9
• Includes all structural members
• May include some “seismically nonstructural” members
• Has units of FORCE/DISPLACEMENT
SPRING
FORCE
DISPLACEMENT
1.0
K
STIFFNESS
PROPERTIES OF
STRUCTURAL STIFFNESS
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 10
• Is almost always nonlinear in real seismic response
• Nonlinearity is implicitly handled by codes
• Explicit modelling of nonlinear effects is possible
SPRING
FORCE
DISPLACEMENT
STIFFNESS
AREA =
ENERGY
DISSIPATED
PROPERTIES OF
STRUCTURAL STIFFNESS
(2)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 11
)
t
cos(
u
)
t
sin(
u
)
t
(
u ω
+
ω
ω
= 0
0

mu t k u t
( ) ( )
  0
Equation of Motion:
0
0u
u 
Initial Conditions:
Solution:
m
k
=
ω
UNDAMPED FREE
VIBRATION
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 12
m
k
=
ω
π
2
ω
=
f
ω
π
2
=
1
=
f
T
Period of Vibration
(sec/cycle)
Cyclic Frequency
(cycles/sec, Hertz)
Circular Frequency
(radians/sec)
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Time, seconds
Displacement,
inches
T = 0.5 sec
u0

u0
1.0
UNDAMPED FREE
VIBRATION (2)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 13
)]
t
sin(
u
u
)
t
cos(
u
[
e
)
t
(
u D
D
D
t
ω
ω
ξω
+
+
ω
= 0
0
0
ξω

mu t c u t k u t
( ) ( ) ( )
   0
Equation of Motion:
0
0u
u 
Initial Conditions:
Solution:
c
c
c
m
c
=
ω
2
=
ξ
2
ξ
-
1
ω
=
ωD
DAMPED FREE VIBRATION
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 14
Time, seconds
Displacement, inches
x = Damping ratio
When x = 1.0, the system is called critically damped.
Response of Critically Damped System, x  1.0 or 100% critical
DAMPING IN STRUCTURES
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 15
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Time, seconds
Displacement,
inches
0% Damping
10% Damping
20% Damping
DAMPED FREE VIBRATION
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 16
DAMPING IN STRUCTURES
TRUE DAMPING IN STRUCTURES IS NOT VISCOUS.
HOWEVER, FOR LOW DAMPING VALUES, VISCOUS
DAMPING ALLOWS FOR LINEAR EQUATIONS AND
VASTLY SIMPLIFIES THE SOLUTION.
-4.00
-2.00
0.00
2.00
4.00
-20.00 -10.00 0.00 10.00 20.00
Velocity, In/sec
Damping
Force,
Kips
Velocity, in/sec.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 17
Welded Steel Frame x = 0.010
Bolted Steel Frame x = 0.020
Uncracked Prestressed Concrete x = 0.015
Uncracked Reinforced Concrete x = 0.020
Cracked Reinforced Concrete x = 0.035
Glued Plywood Shear wall x = 0.100
Nailed Plywood Shear wall x = 0.150
Damaged Steel Structure x = 0.050
Damaged Concrete Structure x = 0.075
Structure with Added Damping x = 0.250
DAMPING IN STRUCTURES
(2)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 18
Natural Damping
Supplemental Damping
ξ is a structural (material) property,
independent of mass and stiffness
critical
0
7
to
5
0
=
ξ %
.
.
NATURAL
ξ is a structural property, dependent on
mass and stiffness, and
damping constant C of device
critical
30
to
10
=
ξ %
AL
SUPPLEMENT
C
DAMPING IN STRUCTURES
(3)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 19
)
t
sin(
p
)
t
(
u
k
)
t
(
u
m ω
=
+ 0


Equation of Motion:
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Time, Seconds
Force,
Kips
po=100 kips
= 0.25 sec
= Frequency of the Forcing Function
ω
π
2
=
T
ω
T
UNDAMPED HARMONIC LOADING
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 20
Solution:
)]
t
sin(
)
t
[sin(
)
/
(
k
p
)
t
(
u ω
ω
ω
-
ω
ω
ω
-
1
1
= 2
0
)
t
sin(
p
)
t
(
u
k
)
t
(
u
m ω
=
+ 0


Equation of Motion:
Assume system is initially at rest:
UNDAMPED HARMONIC
LOADING (2)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 21
Define
ω
ω
=
β
( )
)
t
sin(
)
t
sin(
k
p
)
t
(
u ω
β
-
ω
β
-
1
1
= 2
0
Static Displacement,
The Steady State
Response is always at
the structure’s loading frequency
Transient Response
(at structure’s frequency)
LOADING FREQUENCY
Structure’s NATURAL FREQUENCY
Dynamic Magnifier,
UNDAMPED HARMONIC
LOADING
S
u
D
R
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 22
-10
-5
0
5
10
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Displacement,
in.
-10
-5
0
5
10
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Displacement,
in.
-10
-5
0
5
10
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Time, seconds
Displacement,
in.
-200
-100
0
100
200
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Force,
Kips
rad/sec
π
2
=
ω
rad/sec
π
4
=
ω uS  50
. .
in
5
0
=
β .
LOADING,kips
STEADY
STATE
RESPONSE, in.
TRANSIENT
RESPONSE, in.
TOTAL
RESPONSE, in.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 23
STEADY
STATE
RESPONSE, in.
TRANSIENT
RESPONSE, in.
TOTAL
RESPONSE, in.
LOADING,
kips
rad/sec
π
4
=
ω
rad/sec
π
4
≈
ω .
in
0
.
5

S
u
99
0
=
β .
-500
-250
0
250
500
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Displacement,
in. -150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Force,
Kips
-500
-250
0
250
500
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Displacement,
in.
-80
-40
0
40
80
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Time, seconds
Displacement,
in.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 24
-80
-40
0
40
80
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Time, seconds
Displacement,
in.
S
u
π
2
Linear Envelope
UNDAMPED RESONANT
RESPONSE CURVE
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 25
STEADY
STATE
RESPONSE, in.
TRANSIENT
RESPONSE, in.
TOTAL
RESPONSE, in.
LOADING, kips
rad/sec
π
4
=
ω
rad/sec
π
4
≈
ω uS  50
. .
in
01
1
=
β .
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Force,
Kips
-500
-250
0
250
500
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Displacement,
in.
-500
-250
0
250
500
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Displacement,
in.
-80
-40
0
40
80
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Time, seconds
Displacement,
in.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 26
STEADY
STATE
RESPONSE, in.
TRANSIENT
RESPONSE, in.
TOTAL
RESPONSE, in.
LOADING, kips
rad/sec
π
8
=
ω
rad/sec
π
4
=
ω uS  50
. .
in
0
2
=
β .
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Force,
Kips
-6
-3
0
3
6
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Displacement,
in.
-6
-3
0
3
6
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Displacement,
in.
-6
-3
0
3
6
0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
Time, seconds
Displacement,
in.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 27
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00
Frequency Ratio 
Magnification
Factor
1/(1-

2
)
Resonance
Slowly
Loaded
1.00
Rapidly
Loaded
RESPONSE RATIO: STEADY
STATE TO STATIC
(ABSOLUTE VALUES)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 28
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
Time, Seconds
Displacement
Amplitude,
Inches
0% Damping %5 Damping
HARMONIC LOADING AT RESONANCE
EFFECTS OF DAMPING
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 29
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00
Frequency Ratio, 
Dynamic
Response
Amplifier
0.0% Damping
5.0 % Damping
10.0% Damping
25.0 % Damping
2
2
2
ξβ
2
+
β
-
1
1
=
)
(
)
(
RD
Resonance
Slowly
Loaded
Rapidly
Loaded
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 30
SUMMARY REGARDING
VISCOUS DAMPING
IN HARMONICALLY LOADED
SYSTEMS
• FOR SYSTEM LOADED AT A FREQUENCY LESS THAN √2 OR 1.414 TIMES ITS
NATURAL FREQUENCY, THE DYNAMIC RESPONSE EXCEEDS THE STATIC
RESPONSE. THIS IS REFERRED TO AS DYNAMIC AMPLIFICATION.
• AN UNDAMPED SYSTEM, LOADED AT RESONANCE, WILL HAVE AN UNBOUNDED
INCREASE IN DISPLACEMENT OVER TIME.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 31
SUMMARY REGARDING
VISCOUS DAMPING
IN HARMONICALLY LOADED
SYSTEMS
• DAMPING IS AN EFFECTIVE MEANS FOR DISSIPATING ENERGY IN THE SYSTEM.
UNLIKE STRAIN ENERGY, WHICH IS RECOVERABLE, DISSIPATED ENERGY IS
NOT RECOVERABLE.
• A DAMPED SYSTEM, LOADED AT RESONANCE, WILL HAVE A LIMITED
DISPLACEMENT OVER TIME, WITH THE LIMIT BEING (1/2X) TIMES THE STATIC
DISPLACEMENT.
• DAMPING IS MOST EFFECTIVE FOR SYSTEMS LOADED AT OR NEAR
RESONANCE.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 32
LOADING YIELDING
UNLOADING UNLOADED
F F
F
u
F
u
u u
ENERGY
ABSORBED
ENERGY
DISSIPATED
ENERGY
RECOVERED
TOTAL
ENERGY
DISSIPATED
CONCEPT OF ENERGY ABSORBED
AND DISSIPATED
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 33
-0.40
-0.20
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00
TIME, SECONDS
GROUND
ACC,
g
DEVELOPMENT OF EFFECTIVE
EARTHQUAKE FORCE  Unlike wind loading,
earthquakes do not apply
any direct forces on a
structure
 Earthquake ground motion
causes the base to move,
while masses at the floor
levels try to stay in their
places due to inertia.
 This creates stresses in the
resisting elements.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 34
ut
ug ur
DEVELOPMENT OF EFFECTIVE
EARTHQUAKE FORCE
ug = Ground displacement
ur = Relative displacement
ut = Total displacement
= ug + ur
ut = Total acceleration
= ug + ur
:
:
:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 35
m u t u t cu t k u t
g r r r
[ ( )  ( )]  ( ) ( )
    0
mu t cu t k u t mu t
r r r g
 ( )  ( ) ( )  ( )
   
DEVELOPMENT OF EFFECTIVE
EARTHQUAKE FORCE
• INERTIA FORCE DEPENDS ON THE TOTAL ACCELERATION OF THE MASSES.
• RESISTING FORCES FROM STIFFNESS AND DAMPING DEPEND ON THE RELATIVE
DISPLACEMENT AND VELOCITY.
• THUS, THE EQUATION OF MOTION CAN BE WRITTEN AS:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 36
Many ground motions now
available via the Internet
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time (sec)
Ground
Acceleration
(g's)
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time (sec)
Ground
Velocity
(cm/sec)
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time (sec)
Ground
Displacement
(cm)
EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION -
1940 EL CENTRO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 37
)
(
)
(
)
(
)
( t
u
m
t
u
k
t
u
c
t
u
m g
r
r
r




 



)
(
)
(
)
(
)
( t
u
t
u
m
k
t
u
m
c
t
u g
r
r
r




 



ξω
2
=
m
c 2
ω
=
m
k
Divide through by m:
Make substitutions:
)
t
(
u
)
t
(
u
)
t
(
u
)
t
(
u g
r
r
r




 -
=
ω
+
ξω
2
+ 2
Simplified form:
“SIMPLIFIED” FORM OF EQUATION OF
MOTION:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 38
“SIMPLIFIED” FORM OF EQUATION OF
MOTION:
• FOR A GIVEN GROUND MOTION, THE RESPONSE HISTORY UR(T) IS A FUNCTION
OF THE STRUCTURE’S FREQUENCY W AND DAMPING RATIO X
)
t
(
u
)
t
(
u
)
t
(
u
)
t
(
u g
r
r
r




 -
=
ω
+
ξω
2
+ 2
Ground motion acceleration history
Structural frequency
Damping ratio
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 39
Change in ground motion
or structural parameters x
and w requires re-calculation
of structural response
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time (sec)
Structural
Displacement
(in)
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time (sec)
Ground
Acceleration
(g's)
Excitation applied to
structure with given x and w
Peak Displacement
Computed Response
SOLVER
RESPONSE TO GROUND MOTION
(1940 EL CENTRO)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 40
0
4
8
12
16
0 2 4 6 8 10
PERIOD, Seconds
DISPLACEMENT,
inches
5% Damped Response
Spectrum for Structure
Responding to 1940 El
Centro Ground Motion
THE ELASTIC RESPONSE SPECTRUM
AN ELASTIC RESPONSE SPECTRUM IS A PLOT OF THE PEAK
COMPUTED RELATIVE DISPLACEMENT, UR, FOR AN ELASTIC
STRUCTURE WITH A CONSTANT DAMPING X AND A VARYING
FUNDAMENTAL FREQUENCY W (OR PERIOD T=2P/W), RESPONDING
TO A GIVEN GROUND MOTION.
PEAK
DISPLACEMENT,
inches
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 41
COMPUTATION
OF
DEFORMATION
(OR
DISPLACEMENT)
RESPONSE
SPECTRUM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 42
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
Period, Seconds
Displacement,
Inches
COMPLETE 5% DAMPED ELASTIC DISPLACEMENT
RESPONSE SPECTRUM FOR EL CENTRO GROUND MOTION
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 43
DEVELOPMENT OF PSEUDOVELOCITY
RESPONSE SPECTRUM
D
)
T
(
PSV ω
≡
5% Damping
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 44
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
350.0
400.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
Period, Seconds
Pseudoacceleration,
in/sec
2
D
)
T
(
PSA 2
ω
≡
5% Damping
DEVELOPMENT OF
PSEUDOACCELERATION
RESPONSE SPECTRUM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 45
NOTE ABOUT THE RESPONSE
SPECTRUM
THE PSEUDOACCELERATION RESPONSE SPECTRUM REPRESENTS THE TOTAL
ACCELERATION OF THE SYSTEM, NOT THE RELATIVE ACCELERATION. IT IS NEARLY
IDENTICAL TO THE TRUE TOTAL ACCELERATION RESPONSE SPECTRUM FOR
LIGHTLY DAMPED STRUCTURES.
5% Damping
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 46
0.00
50.00
100.00
150.00
200.00
250.00
300.00
350.00
0.1 1 10
Period (sec)
Acceleration
(in/sec
2
)
Total Acceleration Pseudo-Acceleration
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PSEUDO-
ACCELERATION AND TOTAL
ACCELERATION
• SYSTEM WITH 5% DAMPING
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 47
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
Period, Seconds
Pseudoacceleration,
g
0%
5%
10%
20%
Damping
PSEUDOACCELERATION RESPONSE
SPECTRA
FOR DIFFERENT DAMPING VALUES
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 48
Example Structure
K = 500 kips/in.
W = 2,000 kips
M = 2000/386.4 = 5.18 kip-sec2/in.
w = (K/M)0.5 =9.82 rad/sec
T=2p/w = 0.64 sec
5% Critical Damping
@T=0.64 sec, Pseudoacceleration = 301 in./sec2
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
350.0
400.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
Period, Seconds
Pseudoacceleration,
in/sec
2
Base Shear = M x PSA = 5.18(301) = 1559 kips
USE OF AN ELASTIC RESPONSE
SPECTRUM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 49
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00
PERIOD, Seconds
PSEUDOVELOCITY,
in/sec
FOUR-WAY LOG PLOT OF RESPONSE
SPECTRUM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 50
0.1
1
10
100
0.01 0.1 1 10
Period, Seconds
Pseudo
Velocity,
In/Sec
0% Damping
5% Damping
10% Damping
20* Damping
For a given earthquake,
small variations in structural
frequency (period) can produce
significantly different results.
1940 EL CENTRO, 0.35 G, N-S
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 51
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00
Pseuso
Velocity,
in/sec
Period, seconds
El Centro
Loma Prieta
North Ridge
San Fernando
Average
Different earthquakes
will have different spectra.
5% DAMPED SPECTRA FOR FOUR
CALIFORNIA EARTHQUAKES SCALED
TO 0.40 G (PGA)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 52
Relative Displacement
Total Acceleration
Ground Displacement
Zero
VERY FLEXIBLE STRUCTURE
(T > 10 SEC)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 53
Total Acceleration
Zero
Ground Acceleration
Relative Displacement
VERY STIFF STRUCTURE
(T < 0.01 SEC)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 54
ASCE 7-10 USES A SMOOTHED
DESIGN ACCELERATION SPECTRUM
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Period, seconds
0.4SDS
Sa = SD1 / T
Sa = SDS(0.4 + 0.6 T/T0)
Sa = SD1 TL / T2
TS
T0
Spectral
Acceleration,
g
SD1
SDS
TS = SD1 / SDS
T0 = 0.2TS
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 55
Linear Multiple Degree
of Freedom Systems
PART II
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 56
STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS OF MDOF
SYSTEMS
• UNCOUPLING OF EQUATIONS THROUGH USE OF NATURAL MODE SHAPES
• SOLUTION OF UNCOUPLED EQUATIONS
• RECOMBINATION OF COMPUTED RESPONSE
• MODAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS
• EQUIVALENT LATERAL FORCE PROCEDURE
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 57
SOLVING EQUATIONS OF MOTION
• WE NEED TO DEVELOP A WAY TO SOLVE THE EQUATIONS OF MOTION.
• THIS WILL BE DONE BY A TRANSFORMATION OF COORDINATES
FROM NORMAL COORDINATES (DISPLACEMENTS AT THE NODES) TO MODAL
COORDINATES (AMPLITUDES OF THE NATURAL MODE SHAPES).
• BECAUSE OF THE ORTHOGONALITY PROPERTY OF THE NATURAL MODE SHAPES,
THE EQUATIONS OF MOTION BECOME UNCOUPLED, ALLOWING THEM TO BE
SOLVED AS SDOF EQUATIONS.
• AFTER SOLVING, WE CAN TRANSFORM BACK TO THE NORMAL
COORDINATES.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 58
EQUATIONS OF MOTION
MULTI-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM SYSTEM
- MASS CONCENTRATED AT FLOOR LEVELS WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO LATERAL
DISPLACEMENTS ONLY
          
p(t)
u
k
u
c
u
m r
r
r 

 


U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 59
EQUATIONS OF MOTION
• FREE VIBRATION
[C] = [0], {P(T)} = {0}
       
0

 r
r u
k
u
m 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 60
EQUATIONS OF MOTION
MOTION OF A SYSTEM IN FREE VIBRATION IS SIMPLE HARMONIC
{ } { }
{ } { }
{ } { } t
sin
A
u
t
cos
A
u
t
sin
A
u
r
r
r
ω
ω
-
=
ω
ω
=
ω
=
2



U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 61
EQUATIONS OF MOTION
[ ]{ } [ ]{ } { }
[ ]{ } { }
0
=
ω
-
0
=
+
ω
2
2
A
m
k
A
k
A
m
-
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 62
EXAMPLE
Given
hs = 10 ft
w = 386.4 kips/floor
E = 4000 ksi
Icol = 4500 in.4 each
column (0.7Ig )
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 63
DETERMINE MASS MATRIX
M = W/G = 386.4 / 386.4
= 1.0 KIP-SEC.2/IN.
 











1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
m
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 64
DETERMINE STIFFNESS MATRIX
k = 12EI/hs
3 = 12 x 4000 x 9000 / (12x10)3 = 250 kips/in.
kij = force corresponding to
displacement of coordinate i
resulting from a unit
displacement of coordinate j
 















1
1
0
1
2
1
0
1
2
250
k
250
250
250
K13 = 0
K23 = -250
K33 = 250
K12= -250
K22= 500
K32 = -250
K11= 500
K21= -250
K31 = 0
1
1
1
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 65
FIND DETERMINANT FOR MATRIX
[K] - w2[M]
w1 = 7.036 RADIANS/SEC.
w2 = 19.685 RADIANS/SEC.
w3 = 28.491 RADIANS/SEC.
The period is equal
to 2p/w:
T1 = 0.893 sec.
T2 = 0.319 sec.
T3 = 0.221 sec.
Setting the determinant of
the above matrix equal to
zero yields the following
frequencies:
   










w



w



w


w

2
2
2
2
250
250
0
250
500
250
0
250
500
m
k
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 66
FIND MODE SHAPES
First Mode:









































0
0
0
)
036
.
7
(
250
250
0
250
)
036
.
7
(
500
250
0
250
)
036
.
7
(
500
11
21
31
2
2
2
31 = 1.0, 21 = 0.802, 11 = 0.445
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 67
Second Mode:
32 = 1.0, 22 = -0.55, 12 = -1.22
Find Mode Shapes









































0
0
0
)
685
.
19
(
250
250
0
250
)
685
.
19
(
500
250
0
250
)
685
.
19
(
500
12
22
32
2
2
2
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 68
Third Mode:
33 = 1.0, 23 = -2.25, 13 = 1.802
Find Mode Shapes









































0
0
0
)
491
.
28
(
250
250
0
250
)
491
.
28
(
500
250
0
250
)
491
.
28
(
500
13
23
33
2
2
2
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 69
Orthogonality Properties of
Natural Mode Shapes
The natural modes of vibration of any multi degree of
freedom system are orthogonal with respect to the mass
and stiffness matrices. The same type of orthogonality can
be assumed to apply to the damping matrix as well:
{m}T[m] {n} = 0
{m}T[c] {n} = 0 for m ≠ n
{m}T[k] {n} = 0
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 70
MODE SUPERPOSITION ANALYSIS OF
EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE








































3
2
1
33
32
31
23
22
21
13
12
11
3
2
1
X
X
X
u
u
u
r
r
r
3
33
2
32
1
31
3
3
23
2
22
1
21
2
3
13
2
12
1
11
1
X
X
X
u
X
X
X
u
X
X
X
u
r
r
r


















or
or
     
     
X
X
ur 




 3
2
1
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 71
Mode Superposition Analysis of Earthquake
Response
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 72
MODAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS
AN ELASTIC DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURE UTILIZING
THE PEAK DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF ALL MODES HAVING A
SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION TO TOTAL STRUCTURAL
RESPONSE. PEAK MODAL RESPONSES ARE CALCULATED
USING THE ORDINATES OF THE APPROPRIATE RESPONSE
SPECTRUM CURVE WHICH CORRESPOND TO THE MODAL
PERIODS. MAXIMUM MODAL CONTRIBUTIONS ARE
COMBINED IN A STATISTICAL MANNER TO OBTAIN AN
APPROXIMATE TOTAL STRUCTURAL RESPONSE.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 73
ASCE 7-10 SECTION 11.4.5
GENERAL PROCEDURE DESIGN SPECTRUM
A FIVE PERCENT DAMPED ELASTIC DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRUM CONSTRUCTED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ASCE 7-10 FIGURE 11.4-1, USING THE VALUES OF SDS AND SD1
CONSISTENT WITH THE SPECIFIC SITE.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 74
ASCE 7-10 SECTION 11.4.7
SITE-SPECIFIC GROUND MOTION
PROCEDURES
THE SITE-SPECIFIC GROUND MOTION PROCEDURES SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 21 ARE
PERMITTED TO BE USED TO DETERMINE GROUND MOTIONS FOR ANY STRUCTURE.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 75
RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS
FOR EACH MODE M, DETERMINE:
EARTHQUAKE PARTICIPATION FACTOR
MODAL MASS




1
2
i
im
i
m g
w
M




n
i
im
i
m g
w
L
1
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 76
DETERMINE MODAL MASS AND
PARTICIPATION FACTORS FOR EACH
MODE
= 1.0 KIP-SEC2/IN. (F11 + F21 + F31)
= 1.0 (0.445 + 0.802 + 1.0)
= 2.247 KIP-SEC2/IN.
g
w
L i
i
i




3
1
1
1
= 1.0 kip-sec2/in. (11
2 + 21
2 + 31
2)
= 1.0 (0.4452 + 0.8022 + 1.02)
= 1.841 kip-sec2/in.
g
w
M i
i
i




3
1
2
1
1
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 77
DETERMINE MODAL MASS AND
PARTICIPATION FACTORS FOR EACH
MODE
= 1.0 KIP-SEC2/IN. (F12 + F22 + F32)
= 1.0 (-1.22 - 0.55 + 1.0)
= -0.77 KIP-SEC2/IN.
g
w
L i
i
i




3
1
2
2
= 1.0 kip-sec2/in. (12
2 + 22
2 + 32
2)
= 1.0 (1.222 + 0.552 + 1.02)
= 2.791 kip-sec2/in.
g
w
M i
i
i




3
1
2
2
2
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 78
DETERMINE MODAL MASS AND
PARTICIPATION FACTORS FOR EACH
MODE = 1.0 KIP-SEC2/IN. (F13 + F23 + F33)
= 1.0 (1.802 - 2.25 + 1.0)
= 0.552 KIP-SEC2/IN.
g
w
L i
i
i




3
1
3
3
= 1.0 kip-sec2/in. (13
2 + 23
2 + 33
2)
= 1.0 (1.8022 + 2.252 + 1.02)
= 9.310 kip-sec2/in.
g
w
M i
i
i




3
1
2
3
3
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 79
Response Spectrum Analysis
For each mode m, determine (cont’d):
Effective Weight
Participating Mass
g
M
L
W
m
m
m
2

W
W
PM m





n
i
i
w
W
1
Where weight at floor level i
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 80
Determine Effective Weight and
Participation Mass for Each Mode
kips
in
in
kip
g
M
L
W 72
.
1059
sec
.
.
sec
4
.
386
841
.
1
247
.
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1 





≈ 3 x w = 1159.2 kips
kips
g
M
L
W 65
.
12
4
.
386
310
.
9
)
552
.
0
( 2
3
2
3
3 



kips
g
M
L
W 08
.
82
4
.
386
791
.
2
)
77
.
0
( 2
2
2
2
2 




  kips
Wi 45
.
1154
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 81
Determine Effective Weight and
Participation Mass for Each Mode
 












996
.
0
011
.
0
4
.
386
3
65
.
12
071
.
0
4
.
386
3
08
.
82
914
.
0
4
.
386
3
72
.
1059
3
3
2
2
1
1
PM
W
W
PM
W
W
PM
W
W
PM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 82
RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS
DETERMINE NUMBER OF MODES TO BE CONSIDERED... TO REPRESENT AT LEAST 90%
OF PARTICIPATING MASS OF STRUCTURE (ASCE 7-05 SEC. 12.9.1)
 PM =  (WM/W)  0.90
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 83
RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS
DETERMINE SPECTRAL ACCELERATION FOR EACH MODE FROM DESIGN RESPONSE
SPECTRA
MODE 1: T1 = 0.893 SEC → SA1 = 0.084G
MODE 2: T2 = 0.319 SEC → SA2 = 0.24G
MODE 3: T3 = 0.221 SEC → SA3 = 0.34G
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 84
RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS
DETERMINE BASE SHEAR FOR EACH MODE
MODE 1: V1 = 0.0840 X 1059.72 = 89.0 KIPS
MODE 2: V2 = 0.24 X 82.08 = 19.7 KIPS
MODE 3: V3 = 0.34 X 12.65 = 4.3 KIPS
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 85
RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS
DISTRIBUTE BASE SHEAR FOR EACH MODE OVER HEIGHT OF
STRUCTURE
WHERE FIM = LATERAL FORCE AT LEVEL I FOR MODE M
VM = BASE SHEAR FOR MODE M
m
im
i
im
i
im V
w
w
F
 


U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 86
DISTRIBUTE BASE SHEAR FOR EACH MODE
OVER HEIGHT OF STRUCTURE
Level, i Weight, wi i1 wi i1 Fi1
3 386.4 1 386.4 39.6
2 386.4 0.802 309.9 31.7
1 386.4 0.445 171.9 17.6
= 868.2 88.9
Mode 1 V1 = 89.0 kips
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 87
DISTRIBUTE BASE SHEAR FOR EACH MODE
OVER HEIGHT OF STRUCTURE
Level, i Weight, wi i2 wi i2 Fi2
3 386.4 1 386.4 -25.2
2 386.4 -0.55 -212.5 14.1
1 386.4 -1.22 -471.4 31.2
= -297.5 20.1
Mode 2 V2 = 19.7 kips
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 88
DISTRIBUTE BASE SHEAR FOR EACH MODE
OVER HEIGHT OF STRUCTURE
Level, i Weight, wi i3 wi i3 Fi3
3 386.4 1 386.4 7.8
2 386.4 -2.25 -869.4 -17.6
1 386.4 1.802 696.3 14.1
= 213.3 4.3
Mode 3 V3 = 4.3 kips
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 89
RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS
EXAMPLE
39.6
31.7 17.6
17.6
25.2
14.1
14.1
31.2
7.8
Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 90
RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS
PERFORM LATERAL ANALYSIS FOR EACH MODE... TO DETERMINE
MEMBER FORCES FOR EACH MODE OF VIBRATION BEING
CONSIDERED
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 91
RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS
COMBINE DYNAMIC ANALYSIS RESULTS (MOMENTS,
SHEARS, AXIAL FORCES, AND DISPLACEMENTS) FOR ALL
CONSIDERED MODES USING ROOT MEAN SQUARE
COMBINATION (SRSS)... TO APPROXIMATE TOTAL
STRUCTURAL RESPONSE OR RESULTANT DESIGN VALUES
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 92
ASCE 7 - APPROXIMATE MODAL
ANALYSIS
• ASCE 7 ALLOWS AN APPROXIMATE MODAL ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE CALLED THE
“EQUIVALENT LATERAL FORCE PROCEDURE”
• EMPIRICAL PERIOD OF VIBRATION
• SMOOTHED RESPONSE SPECTRUM
• COMPUTE TOTAL BASE SHEAR V AS IF SDOF
• DISTRIBUTE V ALONG HEIGHT ASSUMING “REGULAR” GEOMETRY
• COMPUTE DISPLACEMENTS AND MEMBER FORCES USING STANDARD
PROCEDURES
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 93
EQUIVALENT LATERAL FORCE
PROCEDURE
• METHOD IS BASED ON FIRST MODE RESPONSE
• HIGHER MODES CAN BE INCLUDED EMPIRICALLY
• HAS BEEN CALIBRATED TO PROVIDE A REASONABLE
ESTIMATE OF THE ENVELOPE
OF STORY SHEAR, NOT TO PROVIDE ACCURATE ESTIMATES
OF STORY FORCE
• MAY RESULT IN OVERESTIMATE OF OVERTURNING MOMENT.
ASCE 7 COMPENSATES.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 94
EQUIVALENT LATERAL FORCE
PROCEDURE
• ASSUME FIRST MODE EFFECTIVE MASS = TOTAL MASS = M =
W/G
• USE RESPONSE SPECTRUM TO OBTAIN TOTAL ACCELERATION @
T1
T1
Sa1/g
Period, sec
Acceleration, g
W
S
g
W
g
S
M
g
S
V a
a
a
B 1
1
1 )
(
)
( 


U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 95
1st Mode 2nd Mode Combined
+ =
EQUIVALENT LATERAL FORCE
PROCEDURE
HIGHER MODE EFFECTS
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 96
V
C
F vx
x 


 n
i
k
i
i
k
x
x
vx
h
w
h
w
C
1
DISTRIBUTION OF FORCES ALONG
HEIGHT
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 97
k=1 k=2
0.5 2.5
2.0
1.0
Period, Sec
k
k = 0.5T + 0.75
(sloped portion only)
K ACCOUNTS FOR HIGHER MODE
EFFECTS
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Structural Dynamics 98
Thank You!!
Any Remaining Questions?

structural-dynamics.pptx

  • 2.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 2 LESSON OBJECTIVES UPON CONCLUSION, PARTICIPANTS SHOULD HAVE: 1. A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF SEISMIC STRUCTURAL RESPONSE IN TERMS OF STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS 2. AN APPRECIATION THAT CODE-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN PROVISIONS ARE BASED ON THE PRINCIPLES OF STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS
  • 3.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 3 Linear Single Degree of Freedom Systems PART I
  • 4.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 4 STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS OF SDOF SYSTEMS: TOPIC OUTLINE • EQUATIONS OF MOTION FOR SDOF SYSTEMS • STRUCTURAL FREQUENCY AND PERIOD OF VIBRATION • BEHAVIOR UNDER DYNAMIC LOAD • DYNAMIC AMPLIFICATION • EFFECT OF DAMPING ON BEHAVIOR • LINEAR ELASTIC RESPONSE SPECTRA
  • 5.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 5 Mass Stiffness Damping F t u t ( ), ( ) t F(t) t u(t) IDEALIZED SINGLE DEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEM
  • 6.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 6 F t ( ) f t I ( ) f t D ( ) 0 5 . ( ) f t S 0 5 . ( ) f t S mu t c u t k u t F t ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )    ) t ( F ) t ( f ) t ( f ) t ( f S D I = + + EQUATION OF DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM
  • 7.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 7 MASS • Includes all dead weight of structure • May include some live load • Has units of FORCE/ACCELERATION INERTIAL FORCE ACCELERATION 1.0 M PROPERTIES OF STRUCTURAL MASS
  • 8.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 8 DAMPING • In absence of dampers, is called Natural Damping • Usually represented by linear viscous dashpot • Has units of FORCE/VELOCITY DAMPING FORCE VELOCITY 1.0 C PROPERTIES OF STRUCTURAL DAMPING
  • 9.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 9 • Includes all structural members • May include some “seismically nonstructural” members • Has units of FORCE/DISPLACEMENT SPRING FORCE DISPLACEMENT 1.0 K STIFFNESS PROPERTIES OF STRUCTURAL STIFFNESS
  • 10.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 10 • Is almost always nonlinear in real seismic response • Nonlinearity is implicitly handled by codes • Explicit modelling of nonlinear effects is possible SPRING FORCE DISPLACEMENT STIFFNESS AREA = ENERGY DISSIPATED PROPERTIES OF STRUCTURAL STIFFNESS (2)
  • 11.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 11 ) t cos( u ) t sin( u ) t ( u ω + ω ω = 0 0  mu t k u t ( ) ( )   0 Equation of Motion: 0 0u u  Initial Conditions: Solution: m k = ω UNDAMPED FREE VIBRATION
  • 12.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 12 m k = ω π 2 ω = f ω π 2 = 1 = f T Period of Vibration (sec/cycle) Cyclic Frequency (cycles/sec, Hertz) Circular Frequency (radians/sec) -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Time, seconds Displacement, inches T = 0.5 sec u0  u0 1.0 UNDAMPED FREE VIBRATION (2)
  • 13.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 13 )] t sin( u u ) t cos( u [ e ) t ( u D D D t ω ω ξω + + ω = 0 0 0 ξω  mu t c u t k u t ( ) ( ) ( )    0 Equation of Motion: 0 0u u  Initial Conditions: Solution: c c c m c = ω 2 = ξ 2 ξ - 1 ω = ωD DAMPED FREE VIBRATION
  • 14.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 14 Time, seconds Displacement, inches x = Damping ratio When x = 1.0, the system is called critically damped. Response of Critically Damped System, x  1.0 or 100% critical DAMPING IN STRUCTURES
  • 15.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 15 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Time, seconds Displacement, inches 0% Damping 10% Damping 20% Damping DAMPED FREE VIBRATION
  • 16.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 16 DAMPING IN STRUCTURES TRUE DAMPING IN STRUCTURES IS NOT VISCOUS. HOWEVER, FOR LOW DAMPING VALUES, VISCOUS DAMPING ALLOWS FOR LINEAR EQUATIONS AND VASTLY SIMPLIFIES THE SOLUTION. -4.00 -2.00 0.00 2.00 4.00 -20.00 -10.00 0.00 10.00 20.00 Velocity, In/sec Damping Force, Kips Velocity, in/sec.
  • 17.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 17 Welded Steel Frame x = 0.010 Bolted Steel Frame x = 0.020 Uncracked Prestressed Concrete x = 0.015 Uncracked Reinforced Concrete x = 0.020 Cracked Reinforced Concrete x = 0.035 Glued Plywood Shear wall x = 0.100 Nailed Plywood Shear wall x = 0.150 Damaged Steel Structure x = 0.050 Damaged Concrete Structure x = 0.075 Structure with Added Damping x = 0.250 DAMPING IN STRUCTURES (2)
  • 18.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 18 Natural Damping Supplemental Damping ξ is a structural (material) property, independent of mass and stiffness critical 0 7 to 5 0 = ξ % . . NATURAL ξ is a structural property, dependent on mass and stiffness, and damping constant C of device critical 30 to 10 = ξ % AL SUPPLEMENT C DAMPING IN STRUCTURES (3)
  • 19.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 19 ) t sin( p ) t ( u k ) t ( u m ω = + 0   Equation of Motion: -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 Time, Seconds Force, Kips po=100 kips = 0.25 sec = Frequency of the Forcing Function ω π 2 = T ω T UNDAMPED HARMONIC LOADING
  • 20.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 20 Solution: )] t sin( ) t [sin( ) / ( k p ) t ( u ω ω ω - ω ω ω - 1 1 = 2 0 ) t sin( p ) t ( u k ) t ( u m ω = + 0   Equation of Motion: Assume system is initially at rest: UNDAMPED HARMONIC LOADING (2)
  • 21.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 21 Define ω ω = β ( ) ) t sin( ) t sin( k p ) t ( u ω β - ω β - 1 1 = 2 0 Static Displacement, The Steady State Response is always at the structure’s loading frequency Transient Response (at structure’s frequency) LOADING FREQUENCY Structure’s NATURAL FREQUENCY Dynamic Magnifier, UNDAMPED HARMONIC LOADING S u D R
  • 22.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 22 -10 -5 0 5 10 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 Displacement, in. -10 -5 0 5 10 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 Displacement, in. -10 -5 0 5 10 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 Time, seconds Displacement, in. -200 -100 0 100 200 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 Force, Kips rad/sec π 2 = ω rad/sec π 4 = ω uS  50 . . in 5 0 = β . LOADING,kips STEADY STATE RESPONSE, in. TRANSIENT RESPONSE, in. TOTAL RESPONSE, in.
  • 23.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 23 STEADY STATE RESPONSE, in. TRANSIENT RESPONSE, in. TOTAL RESPONSE, in. LOADING, kips rad/sec π 4 = ω rad/sec π 4 ≈ ω . in 0 . 5  S u 99 0 = β . -500 -250 0 250 500 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 Displacement, in. -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 Force, Kips -500 -250 0 250 500 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 Displacement, in. -80 -40 0 40 80 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 Time, seconds Displacement, in.
  • 24.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 24 -80 -40 0 40 80 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 Time, seconds Displacement, in. S u π 2 Linear Envelope UNDAMPED RESONANT RESPONSE CURVE
  • 25.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 25 STEADY STATE RESPONSE, in. TRANSIENT RESPONSE, in. TOTAL RESPONSE, in. LOADING, kips rad/sec π 4 = ω rad/sec π 4 ≈ ω uS  50 . . in 01 1 = β . -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 Force, Kips -500 -250 0 250 500 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 Displacement, in. -500 -250 0 250 500 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 Displacement, in. -80 -40 0 40 80 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 Time, seconds Displacement, in.
  • 26.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 26 STEADY STATE RESPONSE, in. TRANSIENT RESPONSE, in. TOTAL RESPONSE, in. LOADING, kips rad/sec π 8 = ω rad/sec π 4 = ω uS  50 . . in 0 2 = β . -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 Force, Kips -6 -3 0 3 6 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 Displacement, in. -6 -3 0 3 6 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 Displacement, in. -6 -3 0 3 6 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 Time, seconds Displacement, in.
  • 27.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 27 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 Frequency Ratio  Magnification Factor 1/(1-  2 ) Resonance Slowly Loaded 1.00 Rapidly Loaded RESPONSE RATIO: STEADY STATE TO STATIC (ABSOLUTE VALUES)
  • 28.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 28 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 Time, Seconds Displacement Amplitude, Inches 0% Damping %5 Damping HARMONIC LOADING AT RESONANCE EFFECTS OF DAMPING
  • 29.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 29 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 Frequency Ratio,  Dynamic Response Amplifier 0.0% Damping 5.0 % Damping 10.0% Damping 25.0 % Damping 2 2 2 ξβ 2 + β - 1 1 = ) ( ) ( RD Resonance Slowly Loaded Rapidly Loaded
  • 30.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 30 SUMMARY REGARDING VISCOUS DAMPING IN HARMONICALLY LOADED SYSTEMS • FOR SYSTEM LOADED AT A FREQUENCY LESS THAN √2 OR 1.414 TIMES ITS NATURAL FREQUENCY, THE DYNAMIC RESPONSE EXCEEDS THE STATIC RESPONSE. THIS IS REFERRED TO AS DYNAMIC AMPLIFICATION. • AN UNDAMPED SYSTEM, LOADED AT RESONANCE, WILL HAVE AN UNBOUNDED INCREASE IN DISPLACEMENT OVER TIME.
  • 31.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 31 SUMMARY REGARDING VISCOUS DAMPING IN HARMONICALLY LOADED SYSTEMS • DAMPING IS AN EFFECTIVE MEANS FOR DISSIPATING ENERGY IN THE SYSTEM. UNLIKE STRAIN ENERGY, WHICH IS RECOVERABLE, DISSIPATED ENERGY IS NOT RECOVERABLE. • A DAMPED SYSTEM, LOADED AT RESONANCE, WILL HAVE A LIMITED DISPLACEMENT OVER TIME, WITH THE LIMIT BEING (1/2X) TIMES THE STATIC DISPLACEMENT. • DAMPING IS MOST EFFECTIVE FOR SYSTEMS LOADED AT OR NEAR RESONANCE.
  • 32.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 32 LOADING YIELDING UNLOADING UNLOADED F F F u F u u u ENERGY ABSORBED ENERGY DISSIPATED ENERGY RECOVERED TOTAL ENERGY DISSIPATED CONCEPT OF ENERGY ABSORBED AND DISSIPATED
  • 33.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 33 -0.40 -0.20 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 TIME, SECONDS GROUND ACC, g DEVELOPMENT OF EFFECTIVE EARTHQUAKE FORCE  Unlike wind loading, earthquakes do not apply any direct forces on a structure  Earthquake ground motion causes the base to move, while masses at the floor levels try to stay in their places due to inertia.  This creates stresses in the resisting elements.
  • 34.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 34 ut ug ur DEVELOPMENT OF EFFECTIVE EARTHQUAKE FORCE ug = Ground displacement ur = Relative displacement ut = Total displacement = ug + ur ut = Total acceleration = ug + ur : : :
  • 35.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 35 m u t u t cu t k u t g r r r [ ( )  ( )]  ( ) ( )     0 mu t cu t k u t mu t r r r g  ( )  ( ) ( )  ( )     DEVELOPMENT OF EFFECTIVE EARTHQUAKE FORCE • INERTIA FORCE DEPENDS ON THE TOTAL ACCELERATION OF THE MASSES. • RESISTING FORCES FROM STIFFNESS AND DAMPING DEPEND ON THE RELATIVE DISPLACEMENT AND VELOCITY. • THUS, THE EQUATION OF MOTION CAN BE WRITTEN AS:
  • 36.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 36 Many ground motions now available via the Internet -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Time (sec) Ground Acceleration (g's) -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Time (sec) Ground Velocity (cm/sec) -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Time (sec) Ground Displacement (cm) EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION - 1940 EL CENTRO
  • 37.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 37 ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( t u m t u k t u c t u m g r r r          ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( t u t u m k t u m c t u g r r r          ξω 2 = m c 2 ω = m k Divide through by m: Make substitutions: ) t ( u ) t ( u ) t ( u ) t ( u g r r r      - = ω + ξω 2 + 2 Simplified form: “SIMPLIFIED” FORM OF EQUATION OF MOTION:
  • 38.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 38 “SIMPLIFIED” FORM OF EQUATION OF MOTION: • FOR A GIVEN GROUND MOTION, THE RESPONSE HISTORY UR(T) IS A FUNCTION OF THE STRUCTURE’S FREQUENCY W AND DAMPING RATIO X ) t ( u ) t ( u ) t ( u ) t ( u g r r r      - = ω + ξω 2 + 2 Ground motion acceleration history Structural frequency Damping ratio
  • 39.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 39 Change in ground motion or structural parameters x and w requires re-calculation of structural response -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Time (sec) Structural Displacement (in) -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Time (sec) Ground Acceleration (g's) Excitation applied to structure with given x and w Peak Displacement Computed Response SOLVER RESPONSE TO GROUND MOTION (1940 EL CENTRO)
  • 40.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 40 0 4 8 12 16 0 2 4 6 8 10 PERIOD, Seconds DISPLACEMENT, inches 5% Damped Response Spectrum for Structure Responding to 1940 El Centro Ground Motion THE ELASTIC RESPONSE SPECTRUM AN ELASTIC RESPONSE SPECTRUM IS A PLOT OF THE PEAK COMPUTED RELATIVE DISPLACEMENT, UR, FOR AN ELASTIC STRUCTURE WITH A CONSTANT DAMPING X AND A VARYING FUNDAMENTAL FREQUENCY W (OR PERIOD T=2P/W), RESPONDING TO A GIVEN GROUND MOTION. PEAK DISPLACEMENT, inches
  • 41.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 41 COMPUTATION OF DEFORMATION (OR DISPLACEMENT) RESPONSE SPECTRUM
  • 42.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 42 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Period, Seconds Displacement, Inches COMPLETE 5% DAMPED ELASTIC DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE SPECTRUM FOR EL CENTRO GROUND MOTION
  • 43.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 43 DEVELOPMENT OF PSEUDOVELOCITY RESPONSE SPECTRUM D ) T ( PSV ω ≡ 5% Damping
  • 44.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 44 0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0 300.0 350.0 400.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 Period, Seconds Pseudoacceleration, in/sec 2 D ) T ( PSA 2 ω ≡ 5% Damping DEVELOPMENT OF PSEUDOACCELERATION RESPONSE SPECTRUM
  • 45.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 45 NOTE ABOUT THE RESPONSE SPECTRUM THE PSEUDOACCELERATION RESPONSE SPECTRUM REPRESENTS THE TOTAL ACCELERATION OF THE SYSTEM, NOT THE RELATIVE ACCELERATION. IT IS NEARLY IDENTICAL TO THE TRUE TOTAL ACCELERATION RESPONSE SPECTRUM FOR LIGHTLY DAMPED STRUCTURES. 5% Damping
  • 46.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 46 0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 300.00 350.00 0.1 1 10 Period (sec) Acceleration (in/sec 2 ) Total Acceleration Pseudo-Acceleration DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PSEUDO- ACCELERATION AND TOTAL ACCELERATION • SYSTEM WITH 5% DAMPING
  • 47.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 47 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 Period, Seconds Pseudoacceleration, g 0% 5% 10% 20% Damping PSEUDOACCELERATION RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR DIFFERENT DAMPING VALUES
  • 48.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 48 Example Structure K = 500 kips/in. W = 2,000 kips M = 2000/386.4 = 5.18 kip-sec2/in. w = (K/M)0.5 =9.82 rad/sec T=2p/w = 0.64 sec 5% Critical Damping @T=0.64 sec, Pseudoacceleration = 301 in./sec2 0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0 300.0 350.0 400.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Period, Seconds Pseudoacceleration, in/sec 2 Base Shear = M x PSA = 5.18(301) = 1559 kips USE OF AN ELASTIC RESPONSE SPECTRUM
  • 49.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 49 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 PERIOD, Seconds PSEUDOVELOCITY, in/sec FOUR-WAY LOG PLOT OF RESPONSE SPECTRUM
  • 50.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 50 0.1 1 10 100 0.01 0.1 1 10 Period, Seconds Pseudo Velocity, In/Sec 0% Damping 5% Damping 10% Damping 20* Damping For a given earthquake, small variations in structural frequency (period) can produce significantly different results. 1940 EL CENTRO, 0.35 G, N-S
  • 51.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 51 0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 Pseuso Velocity, in/sec Period, seconds El Centro Loma Prieta North Ridge San Fernando Average Different earthquakes will have different spectra. 5% DAMPED SPECTRA FOR FOUR CALIFORNIA EARTHQUAKES SCALED TO 0.40 G (PGA)
  • 52.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 52 Relative Displacement Total Acceleration Ground Displacement Zero VERY FLEXIBLE STRUCTURE (T > 10 SEC)
  • 53.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 53 Total Acceleration Zero Ground Acceleration Relative Displacement VERY STIFF STRUCTURE (T < 0.01 SEC)
  • 54.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 54 ASCE 7-10 USES A SMOOTHED DESIGN ACCELERATION SPECTRUM 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Period, seconds 0.4SDS Sa = SD1 / T Sa = SDS(0.4 + 0.6 T/T0) Sa = SD1 TL / T2 TS T0 Spectral Acceleration, g SD1 SDS TS = SD1 / SDS T0 = 0.2TS
  • 55.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 55 Linear Multiple Degree of Freedom Systems PART II
  • 56.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 56 STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS OF MDOF SYSTEMS • UNCOUPLING OF EQUATIONS THROUGH USE OF NATURAL MODE SHAPES • SOLUTION OF UNCOUPLED EQUATIONS • RECOMBINATION OF COMPUTED RESPONSE • MODAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS • EQUIVALENT LATERAL FORCE PROCEDURE
  • 57.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 57 SOLVING EQUATIONS OF MOTION • WE NEED TO DEVELOP A WAY TO SOLVE THE EQUATIONS OF MOTION. • THIS WILL BE DONE BY A TRANSFORMATION OF COORDINATES FROM NORMAL COORDINATES (DISPLACEMENTS AT THE NODES) TO MODAL COORDINATES (AMPLITUDES OF THE NATURAL MODE SHAPES). • BECAUSE OF THE ORTHOGONALITY PROPERTY OF THE NATURAL MODE SHAPES, THE EQUATIONS OF MOTION BECOME UNCOUPLED, ALLOWING THEM TO BE SOLVED AS SDOF EQUATIONS. • AFTER SOLVING, WE CAN TRANSFORM BACK TO THE NORMAL COORDINATES.
  • 58.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 58 EQUATIONS OF MOTION MULTI-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM SYSTEM - MASS CONCENTRATED AT FLOOR LEVELS WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO LATERAL DISPLACEMENTS ONLY            p(t) u k u c u m r r r      
  • 59.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 59 EQUATIONS OF MOTION • FREE VIBRATION [C] = [0], {P(T)} = {0}         0   r r u k u m  
  • 60.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 60 EQUATIONS OF MOTION MOTION OF A SYSTEM IN FREE VIBRATION IS SIMPLE HARMONIC { } { } { } { } { } { } t sin A u t cos A u t sin A u r r r ω ω - = ω ω = ω = 2   
  • 61.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 61 EQUATIONS OF MOTION [ ]{ } [ ]{ } { } [ ]{ } { } 0 = ω - 0 = + ω 2 2 A m k A k A m -
  • 62.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 62 EXAMPLE Given hs = 10 ft w = 386.4 kips/floor E = 4000 ksi Icol = 4500 in.4 each column (0.7Ig )
  • 63.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 63 DETERMINE MASS MATRIX M = W/G = 386.4 / 386.4 = 1.0 KIP-SEC.2/IN.              1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 m
  • 64.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 64 DETERMINE STIFFNESS MATRIX k = 12EI/hs 3 = 12 x 4000 x 9000 / (12x10)3 = 250 kips/in. kij = force corresponding to displacement of coordinate i resulting from a unit displacement of coordinate j                  1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 250 k 250 250 250 K13 = 0 K23 = -250 K33 = 250 K12= -250 K22= 500 K32 = -250 K11= 500 K21= -250 K31 = 0 1 1 1
  • 65.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 65 FIND DETERMINANT FOR MATRIX [K] - w2[M] w1 = 7.036 RADIANS/SEC. w2 = 19.685 RADIANS/SEC. w3 = 28.491 RADIANS/SEC. The period is equal to 2p/w: T1 = 0.893 sec. T2 = 0.319 sec. T3 = 0.221 sec. Setting the determinant of the above matrix equal to zero yields the following frequencies:               w    w    w   w  2 2 2 2 250 250 0 250 500 250 0 250 500 m k
  • 66.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 66 FIND MODE SHAPES First Mode:                                          0 0 0 ) 036 . 7 ( 250 250 0 250 ) 036 . 7 ( 500 250 0 250 ) 036 . 7 ( 500 11 21 31 2 2 2 31 = 1.0, 21 = 0.802, 11 = 0.445
  • 67.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 67 Second Mode: 32 = 1.0, 22 = -0.55, 12 = -1.22 Find Mode Shapes                                          0 0 0 ) 685 . 19 ( 250 250 0 250 ) 685 . 19 ( 500 250 0 250 ) 685 . 19 ( 500 12 22 32 2 2 2
  • 68.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 68 Third Mode: 33 = 1.0, 23 = -2.25, 13 = 1.802 Find Mode Shapes                                          0 0 0 ) 491 . 28 ( 250 250 0 250 ) 491 . 28 ( 500 250 0 250 ) 491 . 28 ( 500 13 23 33 2 2 2
  • 69.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 69 Orthogonality Properties of Natural Mode Shapes The natural modes of vibration of any multi degree of freedom system are orthogonal with respect to the mass and stiffness matrices. The same type of orthogonality can be assumed to apply to the damping matrix as well: {m}T[m] {n} = 0 {m}T[c] {n} = 0 for m ≠ n {m}T[k] {n} = 0
  • 70.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 70 MODE SUPERPOSITION ANALYSIS OF EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE                                         3 2 1 33 32 31 23 22 21 13 12 11 3 2 1 X X X u u u r r r 3 33 2 32 1 31 3 3 23 2 22 1 21 2 3 13 2 12 1 11 1 X X X u X X X u X X X u r r r                   or or             X X ur       3 2 1
  • 71.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 71 Mode Superposition Analysis of Earthquake Response
  • 72.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 72 MODAL RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS AN ELASTIC DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURE UTILIZING THE PEAK DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF ALL MODES HAVING A SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION TO TOTAL STRUCTURAL RESPONSE. PEAK MODAL RESPONSES ARE CALCULATED USING THE ORDINATES OF THE APPROPRIATE RESPONSE SPECTRUM CURVE WHICH CORRESPOND TO THE MODAL PERIODS. MAXIMUM MODAL CONTRIBUTIONS ARE COMBINED IN A STATISTICAL MANNER TO OBTAIN AN APPROXIMATE TOTAL STRUCTURAL RESPONSE.
  • 73.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 73 ASCE 7-10 SECTION 11.4.5 GENERAL PROCEDURE DESIGN SPECTRUM A FIVE PERCENT DAMPED ELASTIC DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRUM CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASCE 7-10 FIGURE 11.4-1, USING THE VALUES OF SDS AND SD1 CONSISTENT WITH THE SPECIFIC SITE.
  • 74.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 74 ASCE 7-10 SECTION 11.4.7 SITE-SPECIFIC GROUND MOTION PROCEDURES THE SITE-SPECIFIC GROUND MOTION PROCEDURES SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 21 ARE PERMITTED TO BE USED TO DETERMINE GROUND MOTIONS FOR ANY STRUCTURE.
  • 75.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 75 RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS FOR EACH MODE M, DETERMINE: EARTHQUAKE PARTICIPATION FACTOR MODAL MASS     1 2 i im i m g w M     n i im i m g w L 1
  • 76.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 76 DETERMINE MODAL MASS AND PARTICIPATION FACTORS FOR EACH MODE = 1.0 KIP-SEC2/IN. (F11 + F21 + F31) = 1.0 (0.445 + 0.802 + 1.0) = 2.247 KIP-SEC2/IN. g w L i i i     3 1 1 1 = 1.0 kip-sec2/in. (11 2 + 21 2 + 31 2) = 1.0 (0.4452 + 0.8022 + 1.02) = 1.841 kip-sec2/in. g w M i i i     3 1 2 1 1
  • 77.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 77 DETERMINE MODAL MASS AND PARTICIPATION FACTORS FOR EACH MODE = 1.0 KIP-SEC2/IN. (F12 + F22 + F32) = 1.0 (-1.22 - 0.55 + 1.0) = -0.77 KIP-SEC2/IN. g w L i i i     3 1 2 2 = 1.0 kip-sec2/in. (12 2 + 22 2 + 32 2) = 1.0 (1.222 + 0.552 + 1.02) = 2.791 kip-sec2/in. g w M i i i     3 1 2 2 2
  • 78.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 78 DETERMINE MODAL MASS AND PARTICIPATION FACTORS FOR EACH MODE = 1.0 KIP-SEC2/IN. (F13 + F23 + F33) = 1.0 (1.802 - 2.25 + 1.0) = 0.552 KIP-SEC2/IN. g w L i i i     3 1 3 3 = 1.0 kip-sec2/in. (13 2 + 23 2 + 33 2) = 1.0 (1.8022 + 2.252 + 1.02) = 9.310 kip-sec2/in. g w M i i i     3 1 2 3 3
  • 79.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 79 Response Spectrum Analysis For each mode m, determine (cont’d): Effective Weight Participating Mass g M L W m m m 2  W W PM m      n i i w W 1 Where weight at floor level i
  • 80.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 80 Determine Effective Weight and Participation Mass for Each Mode kips in in kip g M L W 72 . 1059 sec . . sec 4 . 386 841 . 1 247 . 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 1       ≈ 3 x w = 1159.2 kips kips g M L W 65 . 12 4 . 386 310 . 9 ) 552 . 0 ( 2 3 2 3 3     kips g M L W 08 . 82 4 . 386 791 . 2 ) 77 . 0 ( 2 2 2 2 2        kips Wi 45 . 1154
  • 81.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 81 Determine Effective Weight and Participation Mass for Each Mode               996 . 0 011 . 0 4 . 386 3 65 . 12 071 . 0 4 . 386 3 08 . 82 914 . 0 4 . 386 3 72 . 1059 3 3 2 2 1 1 PM W W PM W W PM W W PM
  • 82.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 82 RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS DETERMINE NUMBER OF MODES TO BE CONSIDERED... TO REPRESENT AT LEAST 90% OF PARTICIPATING MASS OF STRUCTURE (ASCE 7-05 SEC. 12.9.1)  PM =  (WM/W)  0.90
  • 83.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 83 RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS DETERMINE SPECTRAL ACCELERATION FOR EACH MODE FROM DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRA MODE 1: T1 = 0.893 SEC → SA1 = 0.084G MODE 2: T2 = 0.319 SEC → SA2 = 0.24G MODE 3: T3 = 0.221 SEC → SA3 = 0.34G
  • 84.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 84 RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS DETERMINE BASE SHEAR FOR EACH MODE MODE 1: V1 = 0.0840 X 1059.72 = 89.0 KIPS MODE 2: V2 = 0.24 X 82.08 = 19.7 KIPS MODE 3: V3 = 0.34 X 12.65 = 4.3 KIPS
  • 85.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 85 RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS DISTRIBUTE BASE SHEAR FOR EACH MODE OVER HEIGHT OF STRUCTURE WHERE FIM = LATERAL FORCE AT LEVEL I FOR MODE M VM = BASE SHEAR FOR MODE M m im i im i im V w w F    
  • 86.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 86 DISTRIBUTE BASE SHEAR FOR EACH MODE OVER HEIGHT OF STRUCTURE Level, i Weight, wi i1 wi i1 Fi1 3 386.4 1 386.4 39.6 2 386.4 0.802 309.9 31.7 1 386.4 0.445 171.9 17.6 = 868.2 88.9 Mode 1 V1 = 89.0 kips
  • 87.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 87 DISTRIBUTE BASE SHEAR FOR EACH MODE OVER HEIGHT OF STRUCTURE Level, i Weight, wi i2 wi i2 Fi2 3 386.4 1 386.4 -25.2 2 386.4 -0.55 -212.5 14.1 1 386.4 -1.22 -471.4 31.2 = -297.5 20.1 Mode 2 V2 = 19.7 kips
  • 88.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 88 DISTRIBUTE BASE SHEAR FOR EACH MODE OVER HEIGHT OF STRUCTURE Level, i Weight, wi i3 wi i3 Fi3 3 386.4 1 386.4 7.8 2 386.4 -2.25 -869.4 -17.6 1 386.4 1.802 696.3 14.1 = 213.3 4.3 Mode 3 V3 = 4.3 kips
  • 89.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 89 RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS EXAMPLE 39.6 31.7 17.6 17.6 25.2 14.1 14.1 31.2 7.8 Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3
  • 90.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 90 RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS PERFORM LATERAL ANALYSIS FOR EACH MODE... TO DETERMINE MEMBER FORCES FOR EACH MODE OF VIBRATION BEING CONSIDERED
  • 91.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 91 RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS COMBINE DYNAMIC ANALYSIS RESULTS (MOMENTS, SHEARS, AXIAL FORCES, AND DISPLACEMENTS) FOR ALL CONSIDERED MODES USING ROOT MEAN SQUARE COMBINATION (SRSS)... TO APPROXIMATE TOTAL STRUCTURAL RESPONSE OR RESULTANT DESIGN VALUES
  • 92.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 92 ASCE 7 - APPROXIMATE MODAL ANALYSIS • ASCE 7 ALLOWS AN APPROXIMATE MODAL ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE CALLED THE “EQUIVALENT LATERAL FORCE PROCEDURE” • EMPIRICAL PERIOD OF VIBRATION • SMOOTHED RESPONSE SPECTRUM • COMPUTE TOTAL BASE SHEAR V AS IF SDOF • DISTRIBUTE V ALONG HEIGHT ASSUMING “REGULAR” GEOMETRY • COMPUTE DISPLACEMENTS AND MEMBER FORCES USING STANDARD PROCEDURES
  • 93.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 93 EQUIVALENT LATERAL FORCE PROCEDURE • METHOD IS BASED ON FIRST MODE RESPONSE • HIGHER MODES CAN BE INCLUDED EMPIRICALLY • HAS BEEN CALIBRATED TO PROVIDE A REASONABLE ESTIMATE OF THE ENVELOPE OF STORY SHEAR, NOT TO PROVIDE ACCURATE ESTIMATES OF STORY FORCE • MAY RESULT IN OVERESTIMATE OF OVERTURNING MOMENT. ASCE 7 COMPENSATES.
  • 94.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 94 EQUIVALENT LATERAL FORCE PROCEDURE • ASSUME FIRST MODE EFFECTIVE MASS = TOTAL MASS = M = W/G • USE RESPONSE SPECTRUM TO OBTAIN TOTAL ACCELERATION @ T1 T1 Sa1/g Period, sec Acceleration, g W S g W g S M g S V a a a B 1 1 1 ) ( ) (   
  • 95.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 95 1st Mode 2nd Mode Combined + = EQUIVALENT LATERAL FORCE PROCEDURE HIGHER MODE EFFECTS
  • 96.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 96 V C F vx x     n i k i i k x x vx h w h w C 1 DISTRIBUTION OF FORCES ALONG HEIGHT
  • 97.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 97 k=1 k=2 0.5 2.5 2.0 1.0 Period, Sec k k = 0.5T + 0.75 (sloped portion only) K ACCOUNTS FOR HIGHER MODE EFFECTS
  • 98.
    U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers Structural Dynamics 98 Thank You!! Any Remaining Questions?