Star Chart Presentation
•Download as PPT, PDF•
0 likes•170 views
The document discusses Texas' STaR School Technology and Readiness Chart, which was developed based on the state's 2006-2020 Long-Range Plan for Technology. The STaR Chart is a tool for teachers, campuses, and districts to monitor their progress in meeting the goals of the long-range technology plan. It includes teacher and campus charts across four key elements: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and support, and infrastructure. Campuses receive ratings on a scale of 1 to 4 for different sections within each element based on their technology integration.
Report
Share
Report
Share
![Our Agenda ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
Presentation1
The document introduces the Texas STaR Chart, a teacher tool aligned with Texas' Long-Range Plan for Technology from 2006-2020. The STaR Chart is designed to help teachers self-assess and plan improvements across four key areas: Teaching and Learning, Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure for Technology. It also allows schools and districts to gauge progress towards meeting technology goals. Sample data is provided showing percentages of progress across the different areas for one district.
Star
This document introduces the Texas STaR Chart, which measures schools' progress in integrating technology according to the state's Long Range Plan for Technology. It discusses the four key areas measured by the STaR Chart and the levels of progress. The document then provides details on Basswood Elementary School's STaR Chart results, noting its strength in infrastructure for technology but weaknesses in educator preparation, leadership/support, and teaching/learning. It concludes by recommending professional development, utilizing classroom technology, increasing online learning, and collaboration to help the school continue progressing.
STaR chart analysis
Holmquist Elementary School conducted a STaR Chart analysis to measure its performance and progress in technology integration based on the Texas Long Range Plan for Technology (LRPT). The STaR Chart divides progress into four key areas from the LRPT - Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure for Technology. Teachers submit individual results that feed into an overall Campus STaR Chart, assessing progress in these areas as Early Tech, Developing Tech, Advanced Tech, or Target Tech. The analysis found Holmquist's greatest strength was its Infrastructure for Technology due to investments in thin clients and wireless, while its greatest weakness was Teaching and Learning due to loss of
S ta r chart analysis power point
The document discusses the STaR Chart, which is used in Texas to assess how effectively schools integrate technology according to the state's Long-Range Plan for Technology. The plan focuses on 4 key areas: 1) Teaching & Learning 2) Educator Preparation & Development 3) Leadership, Administration & Instructional Support and 4) Infrastructure for Technology. The STaR Chart measures schools' development in these areas on a scale from Early Tech to Advanced Tech. The document then provides sample data from Rick Schneider Middle School showing its progress in each area from 2006-2009.
Texas S Ta R Chart Analysis
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, an assessment tool that measures progress in four key technology areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation and development, leadership administration and instructional support, and infrastructure for technology. It determines funding priorities and provides benchmarks for meeting the goals of Texas's long-range technology plan. Progress is measured at four levels - early, developing, advanced, and target. Summaries from 2006-07 to 2008-09 show the campus advancing from advanced to target levels in most areas, though educator preparation dropped to developing in 2008-09. More information is available at http://starchart.esc12.net/.
Alison clancy star chart
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, which is an online tool that Texas teachers use to self-assess their integration of technology in teaching. The STaR Chart focuses on four areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation and development, leadership and administration, and infrastructure for technology. It provides data from Klein Oak High School, a recognized campus that saw gains in areas like college readiness, completion rates, and test scores. One of its goals is for all freshmen to have laptops.
Ehs Star Chart Ppt
The document discusses a STaR Chart meeting at Ennis High School. It provides background on the STaR Chart, which measures schools in four areas related to technology. It then shares Ennis High School's current STaR Chart scores, which are in the "Advanced Tech" range for all areas. Finally, it explains that meeting participants brainstormed ideas in groups to improve Ennis High School's STaR Chart ratings.
My presentation
Phoenix High School's STaR Chart data from 2007-2010 is presented. STaR Charts measure four domains of technology and readiness according to the Texas Long Range Plan. Phoenix High School showed positive trends in most domains, reaching the Target level in one area. While the school has generally advanced levels of technology, continued improvement is still needed, especially in the Infrastructure and Educator Preparation domains. Overall, the STaR Charts provide an excellent guide for technology improvement at the school.
Recommended
Presentation1
The document introduces the Texas STaR Chart, a teacher tool aligned with Texas' Long-Range Plan for Technology from 2006-2020. The STaR Chart is designed to help teachers self-assess and plan improvements across four key areas: Teaching and Learning, Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure for Technology. It also allows schools and districts to gauge progress towards meeting technology goals. Sample data is provided showing percentages of progress across the different areas for one district.
Star
This document introduces the Texas STaR Chart, which measures schools' progress in integrating technology according to the state's Long Range Plan for Technology. It discusses the four key areas measured by the STaR Chart and the levels of progress. The document then provides details on Basswood Elementary School's STaR Chart results, noting its strength in infrastructure for technology but weaknesses in educator preparation, leadership/support, and teaching/learning. It concludes by recommending professional development, utilizing classroom technology, increasing online learning, and collaboration to help the school continue progressing.
STaR chart analysis
Holmquist Elementary School conducted a STaR Chart analysis to measure its performance and progress in technology integration based on the Texas Long Range Plan for Technology (LRPT). The STaR Chart divides progress into four key areas from the LRPT - Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure for Technology. Teachers submit individual results that feed into an overall Campus STaR Chart, assessing progress in these areas as Early Tech, Developing Tech, Advanced Tech, or Target Tech. The analysis found Holmquist's greatest strength was its Infrastructure for Technology due to investments in thin clients and wireless, while its greatest weakness was Teaching and Learning due to loss of
S ta r chart analysis power point
The document discusses the STaR Chart, which is used in Texas to assess how effectively schools integrate technology according to the state's Long-Range Plan for Technology. The plan focuses on 4 key areas: 1) Teaching & Learning 2) Educator Preparation & Development 3) Leadership, Administration & Instructional Support and 4) Infrastructure for Technology. The STaR Chart measures schools' development in these areas on a scale from Early Tech to Advanced Tech. The document then provides sample data from Rick Schneider Middle School showing its progress in each area from 2006-2009.
Texas S Ta R Chart Analysis
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, an assessment tool that measures progress in four key technology areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation and development, leadership administration and instructional support, and infrastructure for technology. It determines funding priorities and provides benchmarks for meeting the goals of Texas's long-range technology plan. Progress is measured at four levels - early, developing, advanced, and target. Summaries from 2006-07 to 2008-09 show the campus advancing from advanced to target levels in most areas, though educator preparation dropped to developing in 2008-09. More information is available at http://starchart.esc12.net/.
Alison clancy star chart
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, which is an online tool that Texas teachers use to self-assess their integration of technology in teaching. The STaR Chart focuses on four areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation and development, leadership and administration, and infrastructure for technology. It provides data from Klein Oak High School, a recognized campus that saw gains in areas like college readiness, completion rates, and test scores. One of its goals is for all freshmen to have laptops.
Ehs Star Chart Ppt
The document discusses a STaR Chart meeting at Ennis High School. It provides background on the STaR Chart, which measures schools in four areas related to technology. It then shares Ennis High School's current STaR Chart scores, which are in the "Advanced Tech" range for all areas. Finally, it explains that meeting participants brainstormed ideas in groups to improve Ennis High School's STaR Chart ratings.
My presentation
Phoenix High School's STaR Chart data from 2007-2010 is presented. STaR Charts measure four domains of technology and readiness according to the Texas Long Range Plan. Phoenix High School showed positive trends in most domains, reaching the Target level in one area. While the school has generally advanced levels of technology, continued improvement is still needed, especially in the Infrastructure and Educator Preparation domains. Overall, the STaR Charts provide an excellent guide for technology improvement at the school.
Texas STaR Chart
The STaR Chart is an online tool used in Texas to evaluate schools' technology integration in four key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and support, and infrastructure. Schools must complete the STaR Chart annually to assess progress, guide technology planning and budgeting, and qualify for state technology grants. Leon Elementary's STaR Chart ratings show its strongest area is infrastructure but its weakest is educator preparation, and it aims to improve all areas to reach the target technology level.
Texas STaR Presentation
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, which is a teacher tool used by Amarillo High School to plan, self-assess, and measure progress across four areas of technology integration: Teaching & Learning, Educator Preparation & Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. Amarillo High School's current data chart shows their lowest score is in Educator Preparation & Development, and their target is for all areas to reach the developmental technology stage by 2020. Teachers are expected to complete yearly STaR chart reports and integrate technology into their curriculum.
Texas STaR Chart
The document discusses using the Texas STaR Chart to analyze technology use at China Spring Intermediate based on Texas's 2006-2020 Long-Range Plan for Technology. The STaR Chart measures four key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and support, and infrastructure. Findings from China Spring Intermediate's STaR Chart are presented for each area, and the conclusion asks what the school's strengths, weaknesses, and ways to improve ratings are according to the STaR Chart.
Texas S Ta R Chart
The STaR Chart is an assessment tool developed by Texas to evaluate school technology and readiness based on four key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and support, and infrastructure. Teachers are asked to complete the STaR Chart to help determine district progress on technology goals, establish expectations for classroom technology use, and help teachers plan to integrate technology into their lessons.
Texas S Ta R Chart Pp
The document summarizes the Texas STaR Chart, which assesses four areas of technology at the campus and statewide level in Texas - teaching and learning, educator preparation and development, leadership and administration, and infrastructure. It finds that while infrastructure is advanced, the other three areas related to integrating technology into education are still developing. The STaR Chart website allows users to view technology assessments at individual campuses and statewide.
Texas Star chart
The document summarizes the Texas STaR Chart, which identifies the progress of Alief Taylor High School and the district in key technology areas. The STaR Chart measures four areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and administration, and infrastructure. It uses levels like early tech, developing tech, and target tech to classify progress in each area and allows comparisons over time. While Alief Taylor is advanced in some areas like infrastructure, the chart shows there is room for improvement in other areas like educator preparation according to trends from 2009 to 2008. The STaR Chart data helps the school design its technology plan and budget to continually move education towards the future.
Texas s ta r chart
The document summarizes the Texas STaR Chart, which identifies the progress of Alief Taylor High School and other districts in Texas on key technology metrics. The STaR Chart measures four areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Instructional Support, and Infrastructure for Technology. It assigns levels of progress from Early Tech to Target Tech. While Alief Taylor is advancing in some areas like Infrastructure, the summary notes opportunities for improvement in other areas like Educator Preparation based on trends over recent years.
Texas s ta r chart
The document summarizes the Texas STaR Chart, which identifies the progress of Alief Taylor High School and other districts in Texas regarding technology. The STaR Chart measures four key areas of technology - teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and infrastructure. It uses levels from early tech to target tech to classify progress. While Alief Taylor is advanced in some areas like infrastructure, the chart shows room for improvement in leadership and educator preparation. The data can help schools prioritize technology goals and budgets to continually improve their path towards future education.
S Ta R Chart Summary
The document discusses the STaR Chart, which is used by Texas schools to measure progress towards the state's long-range technology plan. It provides statewide and district-level summaries of STaR Chart results. For Spur ISD, the summary shows progress in infrastructure and educator preparation, but more improvement is needed in applying technology to teaching and learning and administrative support.
Texas STaR Chart
The document summarizes Texas's long range plan for technology from 2006-2020, which aims to ensure all students are computer literate by 8th grade. It introduces the STaR chart, a self-assessment tool aligned with the long range plan that measures schools' technology readiness across four levels. The chart shows that in 2007-2008, Leon school was developing in most areas but advanced in infrastructure, and by 2009-2010 it had advanced in teaching and learning and achieved the target level for infrastructure.
STaR PPT 2.0
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, which is used to assess schools' technology use and readiness. It outlines the four key areas assessed: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership/administration, and infrastructure. Statewide, most schools rank at developing or advanced levels, with few at early or target stages. The document then reviews the rankings for Clear Lake High School, which scores at advanced or target levels in all areas, higher than most Texas schools. It concludes that the school will focus on three areas to meet technology targets and keep its exemplary rating.
Texas S Ta R Chart
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, which is a state tool used to assess schools' technology proficiency based on four key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and support, and infrastructure. It provides an overview of how STaR Chart results are used to track progress on technology goals, identify areas for improvement, and set requirements. The document also shares one school's STaR Chart findings and trends over three years, and concludes with recommendations to improve technology integration, professional development, and student access.
Texas Teacher STaR Chart Presentation
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, which is a tool used by schools for technology planning, budgeting, and evaluating progress towards technology goals. It is required by state law. The STaR Chart covers four areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. The document then provides the STaR Chart results for Oakland Elementary School over three years, comparing its performance to statewide summaries. It identifies the school's strengths in leadership administration and support, but weaknesses in infrastructure and lack of gains in educator development. Ways to improve these weaknesses are discussed.
Evaluation slides meet the funder 2013
This document discusses evaluation of projects funded by the Innovation and Strategic Development (IESD) program. It notes that evaluation was previously seen as a barrier to applying for funding. The document recommends that grantees conduct an evaluation of their IESD project using allocated funding. Evaluation should be seen as a tool to improve projects by understanding what works and why. Projects can be evaluated internally or externally. Evaluations should specify the aims, questions, methodology, outputs, and budget. Examples of what to evaluate include delivery models, outcomes, impacts, stakeholder involvement, and cost effectiveness. The document provides tips on measuring impact and notes helpful evaluation guidance available online.
Draft Relief Line Corridor Evaluation
For more information, see http://reliefline.ca
Do not include any personal information as all posted material on this site is considered to be part of a public record as defined by section 27 of the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
We reserve the right to remove inappropriate comments. Please see Terms of Use for City of Toronto Social Media Sites at http://www.toronto.ca/e-updates/termsofuse.htm.
Evaluation process and criteria june 2 2015 final
For more information, see http://reliefline.ca
Do not include any personal information as all posted material on this site is considered to be part of a public record as defined by section 27 of the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
We reserve the right to remove inappropriate comments. Please see Terms of Use for City of Toronto Social Media Sites at http://www.toronto.ca/e-updates/termsofuse.htm.
Project : formulation,evaluation and monitoring
This document provides an overview of key concepts in project formulation, evaluation, and monitoring. It discusses the characteristics and lifecycle of projects, techniques for risk analysis like break even analysis and sensitive analysis, and methods for project evaluation and selection including net present value, internal rate of return, and benefit-cost ratio. It also covers network-based scheduling using critical path methodology and concepts like floats, forward/backward pass computations, and errors to avoid in network drawings.
5 Secrets to Better Presentation Charts and Graphs
Presenting data-driven charts? Here are 5 secrets to delivering Presentation Charts and Graphs powerfully. Visit presentation-process.com for more such insights.
Kids and computers
This document discusses programs for tweens (ages 8-12) that help them learn online skills. It describes websites kids use like YouTube and LEGO.com. It notes surprising questions kids ask, like how to make squiggly email signs or spell websites. The document emphasizes that kids aren't automatically "digital natives" and provides examples of library programs teaching online skills through activities like making book trailers and comic books. It concludes that libraries play an important role in kids' informal learning outside of school.
Flowchart Diagram Templates by Creately
Creately offers many Flowchart diagram templates which you can use instantly to create your own flowchart diagrams. Simple flowchart diagrams to the most creative and system flow diagram templates can be found on our diagram community. Just click on the use as templates button to immediately start modifying it using our online diagramming tools.
Texas
This document provides an overview of the Texas STaRChart, which was developed to monitor progress towards goals in the state's Long Range Plan for Technology from 2006-2020. The STaRChart consists of teacher and campus components with ratings in four key areas of teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership, and infrastructure. It summarizes results from Bill Sybert Elementary School from 2007-2010 and directs users to the statewide STaRChart summary website for more detailed reports and navigation assistance.
Texas STaR Chart
The document discusses the Texas STaRChart, which was developed to monitor progress towards goals in the state's long range technology plan. The STaRChart contains teacher and campus components with ratings in areas like teaching/learning, support, and infrastructure. It provides 3-year summary data for individual campuses to track growth. The document reviews the STaRChart components and website for accessing campus reports to evaluate progress achieving technology goals.
More Related Content
What's hot
Texas STaR Chart
The STaR Chart is an online tool used in Texas to evaluate schools' technology integration in four key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and support, and infrastructure. Schools must complete the STaR Chart annually to assess progress, guide technology planning and budgeting, and qualify for state technology grants. Leon Elementary's STaR Chart ratings show its strongest area is infrastructure but its weakest is educator preparation, and it aims to improve all areas to reach the target technology level.
Texas STaR Presentation
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, which is a teacher tool used by Amarillo High School to plan, self-assess, and measure progress across four areas of technology integration: Teaching & Learning, Educator Preparation & Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. Amarillo High School's current data chart shows their lowest score is in Educator Preparation & Development, and their target is for all areas to reach the developmental technology stage by 2020. Teachers are expected to complete yearly STaR chart reports and integrate technology into their curriculum.
Texas STaR Chart
The document discusses using the Texas STaR Chart to analyze technology use at China Spring Intermediate based on Texas's 2006-2020 Long-Range Plan for Technology. The STaR Chart measures four key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and support, and infrastructure. Findings from China Spring Intermediate's STaR Chart are presented for each area, and the conclusion asks what the school's strengths, weaknesses, and ways to improve ratings are according to the STaR Chart.
Texas S Ta R Chart
The STaR Chart is an assessment tool developed by Texas to evaluate school technology and readiness based on four key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and support, and infrastructure. Teachers are asked to complete the STaR Chart to help determine district progress on technology goals, establish expectations for classroom technology use, and help teachers plan to integrate technology into their lessons.
Texas S Ta R Chart Pp
The document summarizes the Texas STaR Chart, which assesses four areas of technology at the campus and statewide level in Texas - teaching and learning, educator preparation and development, leadership and administration, and infrastructure. It finds that while infrastructure is advanced, the other three areas related to integrating technology into education are still developing. The STaR Chart website allows users to view technology assessments at individual campuses and statewide.
Texas Star chart
The document summarizes the Texas STaR Chart, which identifies the progress of Alief Taylor High School and the district in key technology areas. The STaR Chart measures four areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and administration, and infrastructure. It uses levels like early tech, developing tech, and target tech to classify progress in each area and allows comparisons over time. While Alief Taylor is advanced in some areas like infrastructure, the chart shows there is room for improvement in other areas like educator preparation according to trends from 2009 to 2008. The STaR Chart data helps the school design its technology plan and budget to continually move education towards the future.
Texas s ta r chart
The document summarizes the Texas STaR Chart, which identifies the progress of Alief Taylor High School and other districts in Texas on key technology metrics. The STaR Chart measures four areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Instructional Support, and Infrastructure for Technology. It assigns levels of progress from Early Tech to Target Tech. While Alief Taylor is advancing in some areas like Infrastructure, the summary notes opportunities for improvement in other areas like Educator Preparation based on trends over recent years.
Texas s ta r chart
The document summarizes the Texas STaR Chart, which identifies the progress of Alief Taylor High School and other districts in Texas regarding technology. The STaR Chart measures four key areas of technology - teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and infrastructure. It uses levels from early tech to target tech to classify progress. While Alief Taylor is advanced in some areas like infrastructure, the chart shows room for improvement in leadership and educator preparation. The data can help schools prioritize technology goals and budgets to continually improve their path towards future education.
S Ta R Chart Summary
The document discusses the STaR Chart, which is used by Texas schools to measure progress towards the state's long-range technology plan. It provides statewide and district-level summaries of STaR Chart results. For Spur ISD, the summary shows progress in infrastructure and educator preparation, but more improvement is needed in applying technology to teaching and learning and administrative support.
Texas STaR Chart
The document summarizes Texas's long range plan for technology from 2006-2020, which aims to ensure all students are computer literate by 8th grade. It introduces the STaR chart, a self-assessment tool aligned with the long range plan that measures schools' technology readiness across four levels. The chart shows that in 2007-2008, Leon school was developing in most areas but advanced in infrastructure, and by 2009-2010 it had advanced in teaching and learning and achieved the target level for infrastructure.
STaR PPT 2.0
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, which is used to assess schools' technology use and readiness. It outlines the four key areas assessed: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership/administration, and infrastructure. Statewide, most schools rank at developing or advanced levels, with few at early or target stages. The document then reviews the rankings for Clear Lake High School, which scores at advanced or target levels in all areas, higher than most Texas schools. It concludes that the school will focus on three areas to meet technology targets and keep its exemplary rating.
Texas S Ta R Chart
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, which is a state tool used to assess schools' technology proficiency based on four key areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and support, and infrastructure. It provides an overview of how STaR Chart results are used to track progress on technology goals, identify areas for improvement, and set requirements. The document also shares one school's STaR Chart findings and trends over three years, and concludes with recommendations to improve technology integration, professional development, and student access.
Texas Teacher STaR Chart Presentation
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, which is a tool used by schools for technology planning, budgeting, and evaluating progress towards technology goals. It is required by state law. The STaR Chart covers four areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. The document then provides the STaR Chart results for Oakland Elementary School over three years, comparing its performance to statewide summaries. It identifies the school's strengths in leadership administration and support, but weaknesses in infrastructure and lack of gains in educator development. Ways to improve these weaknesses are discussed.
What's hot (13)
Viewers also liked
Evaluation slides meet the funder 2013
This document discusses evaluation of projects funded by the Innovation and Strategic Development (IESD) program. It notes that evaluation was previously seen as a barrier to applying for funding. The document recommends that grantees conduct an evaluation of their IESD project using allocated funding. Evaluation should be seen as a tool to improve projects by understanding what works and why. Projects can be evaluated internally or externally. Evaluations should specify the aims, questions, methodology, outputs, and budget. Examples of what to evaluate include delivery models, outcomes, impacts, stakeholder involvement, and cost effectiveness. The document provides tips on measuring impact and notes helpful evaluation guidance available online.
Draft Relief Line Corridor Evaluation
For more information, see http://reliefline.ca
Do not include any personal information as all posted material on this site is considered to be part of a public record as defined by section 27 of the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
We reserve the right to remove inappropriate comments. Please see Terms of Use for City of Toronto Social Media Sites at http://www.toronto.ca/e-updates/termsofuse.htm.
Evaluation process and criteria june 2 2015 final
For more information, see http://reliefline.ca
Do not include any personal information as all posted material on this site is considered to be part of a public record as defined by section 27 of the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
We reserve the right to remove inappropriate comments. Please see Terms of Use for City of Toronto Social Media Sites at http://www.toronto.ca/e-updates/termsofuse.htm.
Project : formulation,evaluation and monitoring
This document provides an overview of key concepts in project formulation, evaluation, and monitoring. It discusses the characteristics and lifecycle of projects, techniques for risk analysis like break even analysis and sensitive analysis, and methods for project evaluation and selection including net present value, internal rate of return, and benefit-cost ratio. It also covers network-based scheduling using critical path methodology and concepts like floats, forward/backward pass computations, and errors to avoid in network drawings.
5 Secrets to Better Presentation Charts and Graphs
Presenting data-driven charts? Here are 5 secrets to delivering Presentation Charts and Graphs powerfully. Visit presentation-process.com for more such insights.
Kids and computers
This document discusses programs for tweens (ages 8-12) that help them learn online skills. It describes websites kids use like YouTube and LEGO.com. It notes surprising questions kids ask, like how to make squiggly email signs or spell websites. The document emphasizes that kids aren't automatically "digital natives" and provides examples of library programs teaching online skills through activities like making book trailers and comic books. It concludes that libraries play an important role in kids' informal learning outside of school.
Flowchart Diagram Templates by Creately
Creately offers many Flowchart diagram templates which you can use instantly to create your own flowchart diagrams. Simple flowchart diagrams to the most creative and system flow diagram templates can be found on our diagram community. Just click on the use as templates button to immediately start modifying it using our online diagramming tools.
Viewers also liked (7)
5 Secrets to Better Presentation Charts and Graphs
5 Secrets to Better Presentation Charts and Graphs
Similar to Star Chart Presentation
Texas
This document provides an overview of the Texas STaRChart, which was developed to monitor progress towards goals in the state's Long Range Plan for Technology from 2006-2020. The STaRChart consists of teacher and campus components with ratings in four key areas of teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership, and infrastructure. It summarizes results from Bill Sybert Elementary School from 2007-2010 and directs users to the statewide STaRChart summary website for more detailed reports and navigation assistance.
Texas STaR Chart
The document discusses the Texas STaRChart, which was developed to monitor progress towards goals in the state's long range technology plan. The STaRChart contains teacher and campus components with ratings in areas like teaching/learning, support, and infrastructure. It provides 3-year summary data for individual campuses to track growth. The document reviews the STaRChart components and website for accessing campus reports to evaluate progress achieving technology goals.
Texas STaR Chart
This document provides an overview of the Texas STaRChart, which was developed to monitor progress towards goals in the state's Long Range Plan for Technology from 2006-2020. The STaRChart consists of teacher and campus components with ratings in four key areas of teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership, and infrastructure. It summarizes results from Bill Sybert Elementary School from 2007-2010 and directs users to the statewide STaRChart summary website for more detailed reports and navigation assistance.
Texas STar Chart
This document provides an overview of the Texas STaRChart, which was developed to monitor progress towards goals in the state's Long Range Plan for Technology from 2006-2020. The STaRChart consists of teacher and campus components with ratings in four key areas of teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership, and infrastructure. It summarizes results from Bill Sybert Elementary School from 2007-2010 and directs users to the statewide STaRChart summary website for more detailed reports and navigation assistance.
STaR chart pp
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, which is used to help schools measure their progress in implementing technology. It measures schools in four domains - Teaching & Learning, Educational Preparation, Administration & Support, and Infrastructure. Schools are rated on a scale from Early Tech to Target Tech. The summary discusses how Klein Oak High School compares in each domain and what it needs to do to continue progressing towards the Target Tech level.
S ta r chart presentation
The document is a Texas STaR Chart report for Agnew Middle School that evaluates the school's progress towards technology goals. It summarizes Agnew's results under the Texas Long-Range Technology Plan's four key areas of teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and support, and infrastructure. The report finds room for improvement in teaching and learning and educator preparation, and provides suggestions and websites with more information.
S ta r chart
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, which is a teacher self-assessment tool that measures preparedness to equip students with technology skills. It has four key areas - teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and infrastructure - divided into levels of progress. Data from Greentree Elementary from 2007-2010 showed their strongest area was infrastructure and weakest was educator preparation. The summary identifies strengths like internet access and areas for improvement such as professional development.
S Ta R Chart
The document introduces the Texas STaR Chart, a teacher tool used to plan and self-assess technology readiness. The STaR Chart helps teachers, campuses, and districts determine progress towards goals in the Long-Range Plan for Technology. It identifies four key areas - Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. Campuses receive a classification in each area from Early Tech to Target Tech. The goals of the Long-Range Plan include having all campuses reach Target Tech by 2020 to improve student achievement through technology use and ensure technological literacy.
S Ta R Chart
The document introduces the Texas STaR Chart, a teacher tool used to plan and self-assess technology readiness. The STaR Chart helps teachers, campuses, and districts determine progress towards goals in the Long-Range Plan for Technology. It identifies four key areas - Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. Campuses receive a classification in each area from Early Tech to Target Tech. The goals of the Long-Range Plan include having all campuses reach Target Tech by 2020 to improve student achievement through technology use and ensure technological literacy.
Texas S Ta R Chart
Poteet High School analyzed its technology readiness and usage over 3 years using the Texas STaR Chart assessment tool. The school received advanced technology ratings in all 4 assessment domains of teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and administration, and infrastructure in 2006-2007 and 2007-2008. In 2008-2009, it received advanced ratings in 3 domains and a target technology rating in the remaining domain, showing overall consistency in implementing the Texas Long Range Technology Plan goals at a high level over the 3-year period.
Edld 5352 week two powerpoint d chuick ea1198
The document discusses the Texas STaR chart, which is used to measure technology proficiency among teachers, students, and district leadership. It provides information on how the STaR chart is used to set goals, track progress, and determine funding for a school district and Meyer Elementary in particular. Meyer Elementary's STaR chart scores from 2006-2007 to 2008-2009 are presented, showing improvement but still room for growth. The district is committed to funding new computers and technology resources to help Meyer Elementary achieve higher STaR chart scores and meet technology goals.
Texas s ta r chart
The document summarizes the Texas STaR Chart, which identifies the progress of Alief Taylor High School and the district in key technology areas. The STaR Chart measures four areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and administration, and infrastructure. It uses levels like early tech, developing tech, and target tech to classify progress in each area and allows comparisons over time. While Alief Taylor is advanced in some areas like infrastructure, the chart shows there is room for improvement in other areas like educator preparation according to trends from 2009 to 2008. The STaR Chart data helps the school design its technology plan and budget to continually move education forward.
Texas s ta r chart
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, which identifies the progress of Alief Taylor High School and the district in four key areas of technology. The STaR Chart classifies the school's level of progress as early, developing, advanced, or target tech. While Alief Taylor is advanced in infrastructure, it is developing in educator preparation and leadership administration. The STaR Chart data helps create the technology plan, prioritize funding, and measure student and teacher proficiency.
Texas s ta r chart
The document summarizes the Texas STaR Chart, which identifies the progress of Alief Taylor High School and the district in key technology areas. The STaR Chart measures four areas: teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and administration, and infrastructure. It uses levels like early tech, developing tech, and target tech to classify progress in each area and allows comparisons over time. While Alief Taylor is advanced in some areas like infrastructure, the chart shows there is room for improvement in other areas like educator preparation according to trends from 2009 to 2008. The STaR Chart data helps the school design its technology plan and budget to continually move education forward.
Texas s ta r chart
The document summarizes the Texas STaR Chart, which identifies the progress of Alief Taylor High School and other districts in Texas on key technology metrics. The STaR Chart measures four areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Instructional Support, and Infrastructure for Technology. It assigns levels of progress from Early Tech to Target Tech. While Alief Taylor is advancing in some areas like Infrastructure, the summary notes opportunities for improvement in other areas like Educator Preparation and Development.
Texas star chart
The document discusses the Texas STaR chart, a teacher tool used at North Pointe Elementary to plan technology use and self-assess progress across four stages of development. It outlines the chart's website and components, including teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and infrastructure. North Pointe's results show educator preparation as an area for improvement at the developing stage, and the chart will help track progress, indicate weaknesses, and set future technology goals for the school.
K texas s tar chart
Poteet High School in Texas analyzed its technology readiness and usage over 3 years from 2006-2009 using the Texas STaR Chart. The STaR Chart evaluates schools across 4 domains: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation, Leadership/Administration, and Infrastructure. Poteet High School received an "Advanced Tech" rating in all domains for 2006-2007 and 2007-2008, and in 3 domains for 2008-2009, showing consistent achievement of technology goals and progress towards state targets.
The texas s ta r chart
The Texas STaR Chart is a self-assessment tool used by campuses and school districts to plan, budget for, and evaluate progress in technology. It addresses four key areas: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation and Development, Leadership/Administration/Support, and Infrastructure. Campuses assess their level of progress across these areas on a scale of Early Tech to Target Tech. The document provides an example of one campus' STaR Chart data over three years, which showed developing progress across most areas and a focus on improving Teaching and Learning and Infrastructure.
Campus Texas S Ta R Chart Findings
The document summarizes the results of a school's Texas Campus STaR Chart assessment, which evaluates the school's use and integration of technology across four key areas. According to the assessment results, the school has made progress in some areas but needs improvement in others. The assessment indicates that technology and learning, educator preparation, and leadership/administration need immediate attention to meet the school's goal of being nationally recognized for technology integration by 2015. The school plans to focus on increasing technology integration, providing model technology training for teachers, and ensuring students have consistent access to computer labs.
Texas STar Chart
The document discusses the Texas STaR Chart, which assesses schools' technology readiness and use. It outlines the STaR Chart's key areas of evaluation, including teaching and learning, educator preparation, leadership and infrastructure. Sample data from the 2007-2008 school year is presented for two key areas. The STaR Chart is intended to help teachers plan professional development, collect data, and set goals for using technology to support student achievement.
Similar to Star Chart Presentation (20)
Recently uploaded
Mind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AI
Mind map of common terms used in context of Generative AI.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 5. In this session, we will cover CI/CD with devops.
Topics covered:
CI/CD with in UiPath
End-to-end overview of CI/CD pipeline with Azure devops
Speaker:
Lyndsey Byblow, Test Suite Sales Engineer @ UiPath, Inc.
Uni Systems Copilot event_05062024_C.Vlachos.pdf
Unlocking Productivity: Leveraging the Potential of Copilot in Microsoft 365, a presentation by Christoforos Vlachos, Senior Solutions Manager – Modern Workplace, Uni Systems
Large Language Model (LLM) and it’s Geospatial Applications
Large Language Model (LLM) and it’s Geospatial Applications.
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
The choice of an operating system plays a pivotal role in shaping our computing experience. For decades, Microsoft's Windows has dominated the market, offering a familiar and widely adopted platform for personal and professional use. However, as technological advancements continue to push the boundaries of innovation, alternative operating systems have emerged, challenging the status quo and offering users a fresh perspective on computing.
One such alternative that has garnered significant attention and acclaim is Nitrux Linux 3.5.0, a sleek, powerful, and user-friendly Linux distribution that promises to redefine the way we interact with our devices. With its focus on performance, security, and customization, Nitrux Linux presents a compelling case for those seeking to break free from the constraints of proprietary software and embrace the freedom and flexibility of open-source computing.
Building RAG with self-deployed Milvus vector database and Snowpark Container...
This talk will give hands-on advice on building RAG applications with an open-source Milvus database deployed as a docker container. We will also introduce the integration of Milvus with Snowpark Container Services.
Artificial Intelligence for XMLDevelopment
In the rapidly evolving landscape of technologies, XML continues to play a vital role in structuring, storing, and transporting data across diverse systems. The recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) present new methodologies for enhancing XML development workflows, introducing efficiency, automation, and intelligent capabilities. This presentation will outline the scope and perspective of utilizing AI in XML development. The potential benefits and the possible pitfalls will be highlighted, providing a balanced view of the subject.
We will explore the capabilities of AI in understanding XML markup languages and autonomously creating structured XML content. Additionally, we will examine the capacity of AI to enrich plain text with appropriate XML markup. Practical examples and methodological guidelines will be provided to elucidate how AI can be effectively prompted to interpret and generate accurate XML markup.
Further emphasis will be placed on the role of AI in developing XSLT, or schemas such as XSD and Schematron. We will address the techniques and strategies adopted to create prompts for generating code, explaining code, or refactoring the code, and the results achieved.
The discussion will extend to how AI can be used to transform XML content. In particular, the focus will be on the use of AI XPath extension functions in XSLT, Schematron, Schematron Quick Fixes, or for XML content refactoring.
The presentation aims to deliver a comprehensive overview of AI usage in XML development, providing attendees with the necessary knowledge to make informed decisions. Whether you’re at the early stages of adopting AI or considering integrating it in advanced XML development, this presentation will cover all levels of expertise.
By highlighting the potential advantages and challenges of integrating AI with XML development tools and languages, the presentation seeks to inspire thoughtful conversation around the future of XML development. We’ll not only delve into the technical aspects of AI-powered XML development but also discuss practical implications and possible future directions.
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdf
Monitoring and observability aren’t traditionally found in software curriculums and many of us cobble this knowledge together from whatever vendor or ecosystem we were first introduced to and whatever is a part of your current company’s observability stack.
While the dev and ops silo continues to crumble….many organizations still relegate monitoring & observability as the purview of ops, infra and SRE teams. This is a mistake - achieving a highly observable system requires collaboration up and down the stack.
I, a former op, would like to extend an invitation to all application developers to join the observability party will share these foundational concepts to build on:
Introducing Milvus Lite: Easy-to-Install, Easy-to-Use vector database for you...
Join us to introduce Milvus Lite, a vector database that can run on notebooks and laptops, share the same API with Milvus, and integrate with every popular GenAI framework. This webinar is perfect for developers seeking easy-to-use, well-integrated vector databases for their GenAI apps.
Cosa hanno in comune un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ?
ABSTRACT: A prima vista, un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ potrebbero avere in comune il fatto di essere entrambi blocchi di costruzione, o dipendenze di progetti creativi e software. La realtà è che un mattoncino Lego e il caso della backdoor XZ hanno molto di più di tutto ciò in comune.
Partecipate alla presentazione per immergervi in una storia di interoperabilità, standard e formati aperti, per poi discutere del ruolo importante che i contributori hanno in una comunità open source sostenibile.
BIO: Sostenitrice del software libero e dei formati standard e aperti. È stata un membro attivo dei progetti Fedora e openSUSE e ha co-fondato l'Associazione LibreItalia dove è stata coinvolta in diversi eventi, migrazioni e formazione relativi a LibreOffice. In precedenza ha lavorato a migrazioni e corsi di formazione su LibreOffice per diverse amministrazioni pubbliche e privati. Da gennaio 2020 lavora in SUSE come Software Release Engineer per Uyuni e SUSE Manager e quando non segue la sua passione per i computer e per Geeko coltiva la sua curiosità per l'astronomia (da cui deriva il suo nickname deneb_alpha).
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの？40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの？えこ...
ここ3000字までしか入らないけどタイトルの方がたくさん文字入ると思います。
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!
As the digital landscape continually evolves, operating systems play a critical role in shaping user experiences and productivity. The launch of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 marks a significant milestone, offering a robust alternative to traditional systems such as Windows 11. This article delves into the essence of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0, exploring its unique features, advantages, and how it stands as a compelling choice for both casual users and tech enthusiasts.
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
Today, after several years of existence, an extremely active community and an ultra-dynamic ecosystem, Kubernetes has established itself as the de facto standard in container orchestration. Thanks to a wide range of managed services, it has never been so easy to set up a ready-to-use Kubernetes cluster.
However, this ease of use means that the subject of security in Kubernetes is often left for later, or even neglected. This exposes companies to significant risks.
In this talk, I'll show you step-by-step how to secure your Kubernetes cluster for greater peace of mind and reliability.
Alt. GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using ...
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
“I’m still / I’m still / Chaining from the Block”
“An Outlook of the Ongoing and Future Relationship between Blockchain Technologies and Process-aware Information Systems.” Invited talk at the joint workshop on Blockchain for Information Systems (BC4IS) and Blockchain for Trusted Data Sharing (B4TDS), co-located with with the 36th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE), 3 June 2024, Limassol, Cyprus.
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
This session provides introduction to UiPath Communication Mining, importance and platform overview. You will acquire a good understand of the phases in Communication Mining as we go over the platform with you. Topics covered:
• Communication Mining Overview
• Why is it important?
• How can it help today’s business and the benefits
• Phases in Communication Mining
• Demo on Platform overview
• Q/A
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
My slides at Nordic Testing Days 6.6.2024
Climate impact / sustainability of software testing discussed on the talk. ICT and testing must carry their part of global responsibility to help with the climat warming. We can minimize the carbon footprint but we can also have a carbon handprint, a positive impact on the climate. Quality characteristics can be added with sustainability, and then measured continuously. Test environments can be used less, and in smaller scale and on demand. Test techniques can be used in optimizing or minimizing number of tests. Test automation can be used to speed up testing.
20240605 QFM017 Machine Intelligence Reading List May 2024
Everything I found interesting about machines behaving intelligently during May 2024
Recently uploaded (20)
Mind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AI
Mind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AI
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5
Large Language Model (LLM) and it’s Geospatial Applications
Large Language Model (LLM) and it’s Geospatial Applications
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
Building RAG with self-deployed Milvus vector database and Snowpark Container...
Building RAG with self-deployed Milvus vector database and Snowpark Container...
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdf
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdf
Introducing Milvus Lite: Easy-to-Install, Easy-to-Use vector database for you...
Introducing Milvus Lite: Easy-to-Install, Easy-to-Use vector database for you...
Cosa hanno in comune un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ?
Cosa hanno in comune un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ?
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの？40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの？えこ...
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの？40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの？えこ...
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
Alt. GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using ...
Alt. GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using ...
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
20240605 QFM017 Machine Intelligence Reading List May 2024
20240605 QFM017 Machine Intelligence Reading List May 2024
Star Chart Presentation
- 1. Texas STaR School Technology and Readiness Chart
- 6. Six Sections to each Key Area
- 7. Campus Statewide Summary 2006-2007
- 8. Campus Statewide Summary 2007-2008
- 10. 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 3 Year Overview Advanced Target Advanced Advanced Advanced Target Advanced Advanced Advanced Target Advanced Advanced Domain 4 Infrastructure for Technology Domain 3 Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support Domain 2 Educator Preparation and Development Domain 1 Teaching and Learning
- 11. Texas Campus Star Chart Summary http://starchart.esc12.net/
- 13. Q & A
- 14. Our 21 st Century Learners Teaching them Tech begins Today!