1) The document discusses Article 370 and Article 35A of the Indian constitution which granted special status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir.
2) It provides historical context for the accession of Jammu and Kashmir to India and outlines the key features and provisions of Article 370 and 35A including Jammu and Kashmir having its own constitution and flag.
3) It notes that in 2019, the Indian government revoked Article 370 and 35A, eliminating the special status of Jammu and Kashmir and integrating it fully into India as a union territory. This move is being challenged in the Indian Supreme Court.
The government has scrapped Article 370 which granted special status to Jammu and Kashmir. The state will now be split into two union territories. Article 35A, which defined permanent residents of J&K, has also been abolished. This brings J&K under the full application of the Indian constitution and allows non-residents to buy property and apply for jobs there. While this aims to integrate J&K into India, it may face security threats from Pakistan and protests in Kashmir.
This is the detailed analysis of the situation of Article 35-A and 370 which deals with the accession of J&K State to India. Which is the most famous topic in the yesteryears politics as well as today's politics.
Article 370 of the Indian Constitution grants special autonomous status to Jammu and Kashmir. It allows Jammu and Kashmir to have its own constitution and decision-making powers over all matters except defense, communications, and foreign affairs. The article was incorporated into the constitution as a temporary provision based on commitments made to the then ruler of Jammu and Kashmir during accession to India. Some argue Article 370 should be removed as it creates psychological barriers and encourages secessionist activities in Jammu and Kashmir, while others see it as important for protecting Jammu and Kashmir's autonomy.
Article 370 of the Indian Constitution grants special status to Jammu and Kashmir. It allows the state its own constitution and decision-making rights over all matters except defence, communications and foreign affairs. Over time, several presidential orders have diluted some of the special provisions of Article 370. There is ongoing debate and disagreement between political parties over retaining, diluting or fully abrogating Article 370.
The Indian Independence Act of 1947 officially declared independence for India and partitioned British India into two separate independent dominions - India and Pakistan. The Act established the dominions with legislative supremacy and freedom from British rule. It took effect on August 15, 1947, bringing the British period in India to an end after over 300 years and establishing India's status as an independent and sovereign republic within the Commonwealth.
The Government of India Act of 1935 marked a milestone towards self-government in India. It provided for the establishment of an All-India Federation consisting of provinces and princely states. Power was divided between the Centre and provinces through three lists. However, the federation did not come into being as princely states did not join. The Act introduced dyarchy at the Centre and bicameral legislatures in six provinces. It extended communal representation and established institutions like the Reserve Bank of India and the Federal Court. The Act introduced responsible provincial governments in 1937 before being discontinued in 1939.
This presentation discusses Article 370 of the Indian constitution, which granted special status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. It provides a history of how Article 370 came into effect in 1949 after the Maharaja of Kashmir signed an instrument of accession to join India. The presentation outlines some of the perceived negative impacts of Article 370, such as lack of development and increased terrorism. It then summarizes the scrapping of Article 370 in August 2019 by the Indian government, bifurcating Jammu and Kashmir into two union territories in an effort to integrate the region fully into India.
Government of India has withdrawn the special status of J&K by invoking the Article 370 which had been seen as firewalling the autonomy of Jammu and Kashmir.
The Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order, 2019, has extended all provisions of the Indian Constitution to Jammu and Kashmir, including the chapter on Fundamental Rights.
This is the first time that Article 370 has been used to amend Article 367 (which deals with Interpretation) in respect of Jammu and Kashmir, and this amendment has then been used to amend Article 370 itself.
The government has scrapped Article 370 which granted special status to Jammu and Kashmir. The state will now be split into two union territories. Article 35A, which defined permanent residents of J&K, has also been abolished. This brings J&K under the full application of the Indian constitution and allows non-residents to buy property and apply for jobs there. While this aims to integrate J&K into India, it may face security threats from Pakistan and protests in Kashmir.
This is the detailed analysis of the situation of Article 35-A and 370 which deals with the accession of J&K State to India. Which is the most famous topic in the yesteryears politics as well as today's politics.
Article 370 of the Indian Constitution grants special autonomous status to Jammu and Kashmir. It allows Jammu and Kashmir to have its own constitution and decision-making powers over all matters except defense, communications, and foreign affairs. The article was incorporated into the constitution as a temporary provision based on commitments made to the then ruler of Jammu and Kashmir during accession to India. Some argue Article 370 should be removed as it creates psychological barriers and encourages secessionist activities in Jammu and Kashmir, while others see it as important for protecting Jammu and Kashmir's autonomy.
Article 370 of the Indian Constitution grants special status to Jammu and Kashmir. It allows the state its own constitution and decision-making rights over all matters except defence, communications and foreign affairs. Over time, several presidential orders have diluted some of the special provisions of Article 370. There is ongoing debate and disagreement between political parties over retaining, diluting or fully abrogating Article 370.
The Indian Independence Act of 1947 officially declared independence for India and partitioned British India into two separate independent dominions - India and Pakistan. The Act established the dominions with legislative supremacy and freedom from British rule. It took effect on August 15, 1947, bringing the British period in India to an end after over 300 years and establishing India's status as an independent and sovereign republic within the Commonwealth.
The Government of India Act of 1935 marked a milestone towards self-government in India. It provided for the establishment of an All-India Federation consisting of provinces and princely states. Power was divided between the Centre and provinces through three lists. However, the federation did not come into being as princely states did not join. The Act introduced dyarchy at the Centre and bicameral legislatures in six provinces. It extended communal representation and established institutions like the Reserve Bank of India and the Federal Court. The Act introduced responsible provincial governments in 1937 before being discontinued in 1939.
This presentation discusses Article 370 of the Indian constitution, which granted special status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. It provides a history of how Article 370 came into effect in 1949 after the Maharaja of Kashmir signed an instrument of accession to join India. The presentation outlines some of the perceived negative impacts of Article 370, such as lack of development and increased terrorism. It then summarizes the scrapping of Article 370 in August 2019 by the Indian government, bifurcating Jammu and Kashmir into two union territories in an effort to integrate the region fully into India.
Government of India has withdrawn the special status of J&K by invoking the Article 370 which had been seen as firewalling the autonomy of Jammu and Kashmir.
The Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order, 2019, has extended all provisions of the Indian Constitution to Jammu and Kashmir, including the chapter on Fundamental Rights.
This is the first time that Article 370 has been used to amend Article 367 (which deals with Interpretation) in respect of Jammu and Kashmir, and this amendment has then been used to amend Article 370 itself.
Article 370 and Article 35A , Everything and Detailed PPT. #KashmirMeinTirangaDeepak Poddar
Here I am Discuss about Article 370 and 35A which is remove on 5th August by home Minister Amit Saha led by BJP. Tried to collect relevant details .
What is Article 370
What Is Article 35A
Jammu And Kashmir problem
History of Article 370/35A
The document discusses different types of emergencies that can be declared in India - national emergency, financial emergency, and state emergency. It provides details on the national emergencies declared in 1962 during the India-China war and in 1971 during the India-Pakistan war. The emergency declared by Indira Gandhi from 1975-1977 is analyzed in depth, including the reasons for its imposition like electoral fraud allegations and protests, its effects on civil liberties and opposition leaders, and the role and censorship of the press during that time.
The document discusses Articles 370 and 35A of the Indian constitution regarding the special status of Jammu and Kashmir. Article 370 granted Jammu and Kashmir autonomy over internal administration and allowed it to have its own constitution and flag. Article 35A granted special rights and privileges to permanent residents of Jammu and Kashmir. In August 2019, the government revoked Article 370 through a Presidential order and Parliamentary resolution, removing the special status and making Jammu and Kashmir union territories directly ruled by the central government.
The Indian Independence Act of 1947 legally partitioned British India into two new independent dominions - India and Pakistan. It transferred power to the new governments on August 15, 1947, ending over 300 years of British rule in India. The Act was passed in July 1947 after the acceptance of the June 3rd Mountbatten Plan, which divided British India along religious lines into Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan.
Article 370 of the Indian constitution grants special autonomous status to Jammu and Kashmir. It allows Jammu and Kashmir to have its own constitution and limits the central government's legislative power to three areas: defense, communications, and foreign affairs. It was enacted as a temporary provision in response to the unique circumstances under which Jammu and Kashmir joined the Indian union. It provides Jammu and Kashmir greater autonomy compared to other Indian states.
This document summarizes key aspects of Article 370 of the Indian constitution regarding the state of Jammu and Kashmir. It discusses the historical context for Article 370, including the accession of Jammu and Kashmir to India in 1947. It outlines the main provisions and special features of Article 370, such as Jammu and Kashmir having its own constitution and the limited applicability of parts of the Indian constitution to the state. The document also discusses the text of Article 370 and the autonomy it provides Jammu and Kashmir in certain matters compared to other Indian states.
The document summarizes the Kashmir conflict between India and Pakistan. It provides geographical and historical context, describing Kashmir as a disputed region with a Muslim majority population administered in parts by India, Pakistan, and China. It outlines the wars fought between India and Pakistan over Kashmir in 1947-1948, 1965, and 1971. The current situation involves ongoing violence and civilian casualties, with India accused of human rights violations. Both countries claim Kashmir but have been urged to resolve the dispute bilaterally through negotiations.
The document discusses changes made to India's constitution regarding the declaration of national emergencies. It notes that in 1975 the president could declare emergency on the advice of the prime minister alone, but this was amended in 1977 to require advice from the full council of ministers. The approval process in parliament was also strengthened, requiring a special majority rather than simple majority. Additionally, the 1977 amendments ensured certain fundamental rights could not be curtailed during internal emergencies and gave parliament a role in revoking emergencies passed by simple majority.
The document discusses different types of emergencies that can be declared in India according to the constitution: national emergency, state emergency, and financial emergency. It outlines the grounds and procedures for declaring each type of emergency, as well as their effects, particularly on fundamental rights. It also discusses controversies around judicial review of state emergencies, and notes that while a financial emergency has never been imposed, national and state emergencies have been declared in the past.
Article 370 of the Indian constitution grants special autonomous status to Jammu & Kashmir. It allows Jammu & Kashmir to have its own constitution and restricts the application of all other provisions of the Indian constitution to the state. When India gained independence in 1947, the ruler of Jammu & Kashmir signed an instrument of accession joining India based on commitments around internal autonomy. As a result, only three subjects—defense, external affairs, and communications—come under the Union of India's control.
The document summarizes the Montague-Chelmsford Reforms or the Government of India Act of 1919. It introduced diarchy and limited self-government in British India. Key points included setting up a central legislature with elected Indian representation, establishing provincial ministries responsible for transferred subjects like agriculture, establishing a public service commission, and introducing a limited franchise with a high property qualification. However, it had many limitations like an extremely small franchise, the governor's power to override ministers, and defects in the diarchy system.
The document discusses Articles 370 and 35A of the Indian constitution which grant special autonomous status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. Article 370 allows Jammu and Kashmir to have its own constitution and decision-making powers over all matters except defense, communications and foreign affairs. It also bars outsiders from buying property in the state. Article 35A grants special rights and privileges to permanent residents of Jammu and Kashmir, including exclusive rights to government jobs and property. However, these articles have been controversial as they discriminate against women who marry non-permanent residents and refugees who settled in Jammu and Kashmir. The document also briefly discusses other special provisions for various other states under Article 371 of the Indian constitution.
The document discusses the sources of international law as outlined in Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice. The four main sources are: 1) international conventions and treaties, 2) international customs, 3) general principles of law, and 4) judicial decisions and writings of publicists. Treaties can be either law-making or contractual. Customary international law requires consistent state practice and opinio juris. General principles fill gaps where no positive laws exist. Judicial decisions and writings are considered subsidiary sources.
The India Independence Act of 1947 established the independence of India and Pakistan from British rule. It created the two new independent dominions of India and Pakistan, with India comprising most of British India except for certain provinces divided into Pakistan. The Act established that both dominions would be fully independent and have their own legislatures and governor-generals appointed by the King. It outlined that British rule over India would officially end on August 15, 1947 and transferred governing responsibilities to the new Indian and Pakistani governments.
The slides relate to Part - III of the Indian Constitution i.e. FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. It elaborates on the violation of fundamental rights under the constitution. Useful for Law students and Professionals.
The document summarizes the history of the Kashmir conflict between India and Pakistan since partition in 1947. It discusses that Kashmir is currently divided between Indian administered Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistani administered Azad Kashmir, and Chinese controlled Kashmir. It outlines several proposed solutions to resolve the conflict such as making the Line of Control an official border, dividing Kashmir along the Chenab river, granting independence, or providing autonomy under joint Indian-Pakistani control similar to Andorra. However, it notes that implementing any solution requires agreement between India and Pakistan, which has so far not been possible given both countries' claims over the territory.
The Constitution of 1962 established Pakistan as an Islamic Republic with a presidential system that centralized power in the president. It included Islamic provisions like requiring the president and laws to adhere to Islamic principles. However, it was abrogated in 1969 when President Ayub Khan imposed martial law and transferred power to General Yahya Khan, leading to elections and the eventual separation of East Pakistan.
1) The document discusses national emergencies in India, including the constitutional provisions around declaring emergencies and the effects.
2) Three national emergencies have been declared in India - in 1962 due to the Sino-Indian war, in 1971 due to the Indo-Pak war, and in 1975 by Prime Minister Indira Gandhi.
3) The 1975 emergency is considered the "black spot on democracy" due to the huge misuse of power through preventive detention laws and suspension of civil liberties.
The document discusses Article 370 of the Indian Constitution which grants special autonomous status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. It provides 3 key points:
1) Article 370 allows Jammu and Kashmir to have its own constitution and limits the legislative power of the Indian Parliament in the state. It grants Jammu and Kashmir autonomy over all matters except defense, foreign affairs and communications.
2) The article also led to the enactment of Article 35A which empowers the Jammu and Kashmir legislature to define "permanent residents" of the state and provide them special rights and privileges related to employment, property ownership and scholarships.
3) While Article 370 grants special status, the Supreme Court has
The document summarizes the history and implications of Article 370 of the Indian constitution, which granted special autonomous status to Jammu and Kashmir. Key points:
1) Article 370 allowed Jammu and Kashmir to have its own constitution and laws, limiting the central government's power over the state.
2) In August 2019, the government revoked Article 370 through a presidential order and bifurcated Jammu and Kashmir into two union territories.
3) This subjected Jammu and Kashmir fully to Indian laws and removed its special status, but was controversial due to fears over security and democracy. The region faced an internet blackout and arrests of political leaders.
Article 370 and Article 35A , Everything and Detailed PPT. #KashmirMeinTirangaDeepak Poddar
Here I am Discuss about Article 370 and 35A which is remove on 5th August by home Minister Amit Saha led by BJP. Tried to collect relevant details .
What is Article 370
What Is Article 35A
Jammu And Kashmir problem
History of Article 370/35A
The document discusses different types of emergencies that can be declared in India - national emergency, financial emergency, and state emergency. It provides details on the national emergencies declared in 1962 during the India-China war and in 1971 during the India-Pakistan war. The emergency declared by Indira Gandhi from 1975-1977 is analyzed in depth, including the reasons for its imposition like electoral fraud allegations and protests, its effects on civil liberties and opposition leaders, and the role and censorship of the press during that time.
The document discusses Articles 370 and 35A of the Indian constitution regarding the special status of Jammu and Kashmir. Article 370 granted Jammu and Kashmir autonomy over internal administration and allowed it to have its own constitution and flag. Article 35A granted special rights and privileges to permanent residents of Jammu and Kashmir. In August 2019, the government revoked Article 370 through a Presidential order and Parliamentary resolution, removing the special status and making Jammu and Kashmir union territories directly ruled by the central government.
The Indian Independence Act of 1947 legally partitioned British India into two new independent dominions - India and Pakistan. It transferred power to the new governments on August 15, 1947, ending over 300 years of British rule in India. The Act was passed in July 1947 after the acceptance of the June 3rd Mountbatten Plan, which divided British India along religious lines into Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan.
Article 370 of the Indian constitution grants special autonomous status to Jammu and Kashmir. It allows Jammu and Kashmir to have its own constitution and limits the central government's legislative power to three areas: defense, communications, and foreign affairs. It was enacted as a temporary provision in response to the unique circumstances under which Jammu and Kashmir joined the Indian union. It provides Jammu and Kashmir greater autonomy compared to other Indian states.
This document summarizes key aspects of Article 370 of the Indian constitution regarding the state of Jammu and Kashmir. It discusses the historical context for Article 370, including the accession of Jammu and Kashmir to India in 1947. It outlines the main provisions and special features of Article 370, such as Jammu and Kashmir having its own constitution and the limited applicability of parts of the Indian constitution to the state. The document also discusses the text of Article 370 and the autonomy it provides Jammu and Kashmir in certain matters compared to other Indian states.
The document summarizes the Kashmir conflict between India and Pakistan. It provides geographical and historical context, describing Kashmir as a disputed region with a Muslim majority population administered in parts by India, Pakistan, and China. It outlines the wars fought between India and Pakistan over Kashmir in 1947-1948, 1965, and 1971. The current situation involves ongoing violence and civilian casualties, with India accused of human rights violations. Both countries claim Kashmir but have been urged to resolve the dispute bilaterally through negotiations.
The document discusses changes made to India's constitution regarding the declaration of national emergencies. It notes that in 1975 the president could declare emergency on the advice of the prime minister alone, but this was amended in 1977 to require advice from the full council of ministers. The approval process in parliament was also strengthened, requiring a special majority rather than simple majority. Additionally, the 1977 amendments ensured certain fundamental rights could not be curtailed during internal emergencies and gave parliament a role in revoking emergencies passed by simple majority.
The document discusses different types of emergencies that can be declared in India according to the constitution: national emergency, state emergency, and financial emergency. It outlines the grounds and procedures for declaring each type of emergency, as well as their effects, particularly on fundamental rights. It also discusses controversies around judicial review of state emergencies, and notes that while a financial emergency has never been imposed, national and state emergencies have been declared in the past.
Article 370 of the Indian constitution grants special autonomous status to Jammu & Kashmir. It allows Jammu & Kashmir to have its own constitution and restricts the application of all other provisions of the Indian constitution to the state. When India gained independence in 1947, the ruler of Jammu & Kashmir signed an instrument of accession joining India based on commitments around internal autonomy. As a result, only three subjects—defense, external affairs, and communications—come under the Union of India's control.
The document summarizes the Montague-Chelmsford Reforms or the Government of India Act of 1919. It introduced diarchy and limited self-government in British India. Key points included setting up a central legislature with elected Indian representation, establishing provincial ministries responsible for transferred subjects like agriculture, establishing a public service commission, and introducing a limited franchise with a high property qualification. However, it had many limitations like an extremely small franchise, the governor's power to override ministers, and defects in the diarchy system.
The document discusses Articles 370 and 35A of the Indian constitution which grant special autonomous status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. Article 370 allows Jammu and Kashmir to have its own constitution and decision-making powers over all matters except defense, communications and foreign affairs. It also bars outsiders from buying property in the state. Article 35A grants special rights and privileges to permanent residents of Jammu and Kashmir, including exclusive rights to government jobs and property. However, these articles have been controversial as they discriminate against women who marry non-permanent residents and refugees who settled in Jammu and Kashmir. The document also briefly discusses other special provisions for various other states under Article 371 of the Indian constitution.
The document discusses the sources of international law as outlined in Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice. The four main sources are: 1) international conventions and treaties, 2) international customs, 3) general principles of law, and 4) judicial decisions and writings of publicists. Treaties can be either law-making or contractual. Customary international law requires consistent state practice and opinio juris. General principles fill gaps where no positive laws exist. Judicial decisions and writings are considered subsidiary sources.
The India Independence Act of 1947 established the independence of India and Pakistan from British rule. It created the two new independent dominions of India and Pakistan, with India comprising most of British India except for certain provinces divided into Pakistan. The Act established that both dominions would be fully independent and have their own legislatures and governor-generals appointed by the King. It outlined that British rule over India would officially end on August 15, 1947 and transferred governing responsibilities to the new Indian and Pakistani governments.
The slides relate to Part - III of the Indian Constitution i.e. FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. It elaborates on the violation of fundamental rights under the constitution. Useful for Law students and Professionals.
The document summarizes the history of the Kashmir conflict between India and Pakistan since partition in 1947. It discusses that Kashmir is currently divided between Indian administered Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistani administered Azad Kashmir, and Chinese controlled Kashmir. It outlines several proposed solutions to resolve the conflict such as making the Line of Control an official border, dividing Kashmir along the Chenab river, granting independence, or providing autonomy under joint Indian-Pakistani control similar to Andorra. However, it notes that implementing any solution requires agreement between India and Pakistan, which has so far not been possible given both countries' claims over the territory.
The Constitution of 1962 established Pakistan as an Islamic Republic with a presidential system that centralized power in the president. It included Islamic provisions like requiring the president and laws to adhere to Islamic principles. However, it was abrogated in 1969 when President Ayub Khan imposed martial law and transferred power to General Yahya Khan, leading to elections and the eventual separation of East Pakistan.
1) The document discusses national emergencies in India, including the constitutional provisions around declaring emergencies and the effects.
2) Three national emergencies have been declared in India - in 1962 due to the Sino-Indian war, in 1971 due to the Indo-Pak war, and in 1975 by Prime Minister Indira Gandhi.
3) The 1975 emergency is considered the "black spot on democracy" due to the huge misuse of power through preventive detention laws and suspension of civil liberties.
The document discusses Article 370 of the Indian Constitution which grants special autonomous status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. It provides 3 key points:
1) Article 370 allows Jammu and Kashmir to have its own constitution and limits the legislative power of the Indian Parliament in the state. It grants Jammu and Kashmir autonomy over all matters except defense, foreign affairs and communications.
2) The article also led to the enactment of Article 35A which empowers the Jammu and Kashmir legislature to define "permanent residents" of the state and provide them special rights and privileges related to employment, property ownership and scholarships.
3) While Article 370 grants special status, the Supreme Court has
The document summarizes the history and implications of Article 370 of the Indian constitution, which granted special autonomous status to Jammu and Kashmir. Key points:
1) Article 370 allowed Jammu and Kashmir to have its own constitution and laws, limiting the central government's power over the state.
2) In August 2019, the government revoked Article 370 through a presidential order and bifurcated Jammu and Kashmir into two union territories.
3) This subjected Jammu and Kashmir fully to Indian laws and removed its special status, but was controversial due to fears over security and democracy. The region faced an internet blackout and arrests of political leaders.
Article 35A and 370 of Constitution of India Biswajit Das
1) Article 370 and 35A gave Jammu and Kashmir special status and autonomy in the Indian constitution. Article 370 defined the applicability of the Indian constitution to Jammu and Kashmir until the state drafted its own constitution. It limited the central government's power to three subjects.
2) Article 35A was added through a 1954 presidential order and gave the Jammu and Kashmir legislature the power to define permanent residents and their special rights and privileges.
3) The document discusses the historical context for these provisions, including the accession of Jammu and Kashmir to India and the Delhi Agreement that outlined the relationship between the state and the Indian union.
The document discusses India's revocation of Article 370 and Article 35A in Jammu and Kashmir in August 2019. Article 370 granted special autonomous status to Jammu and Kashmir, while Article 35A allowed it to define permanent residents and their special rights. The Indian government bifurcated Jammu and Kashmir into two union territories, imposed restrictions, and detained political leaders. Despite these actions, India received minimal criticism internationally. The document outlines possible reasons for the muted response, including China and Pakistan's objections being dismissed and international focus on the humanitarian situation over constitutional changes.
The document provides a detailed overview of Article 370 of the Indian constitution, which granted special autonomous status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. It discusses the historical context and events leading to the introduction of Article 370, its key provisions and implications, related constitutional articles like Article 35A, challenges to the article over time, and its eventual removal in 2019. The summary concludes by noting ongoing legal challenges to the revocation and debates around its political and human rights implications.
Will GST apply in whole of India - September 2016Amitabh Khemka
Does the Parliament of India have powers to make law on GST for Union territories WITHOUT Legislature? Model GST Law also does not provide any clarity on applicability of GST in such Union territories.
This document outlines a legal challenge to recent presidential orders and legislation regarding the status of Jammu and Kashmir. It argues that the orders and legislation unconstitutionally undermine India's federal structure and the unique autonomous status of Jammu and Kashmir as laid out in Article 370 of the Indian Constitution. Specifically, it claims the orders and legislation were passed without the consent of the people of Jammu and Kashmir and in a manner that violates principles of constitutional morality and democratic governance.
Constitution of India: Union and its Territories, Citizenship and Official La...DVSResearchFoundatio
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this webinar is to provide insight into the Constitutional Provisions relating to Union and its territories, Citizenship and Official Language. This webinar is the second from the Webinar series on Constitution. The scope of this webinar is confined to discussing the nature of the Indian State, creation and formation of States, etc. This webinar further throws light on the Constitutional provisions with respect to Citizenship along with a brief overview of the Citizenship Act, 1955. The last part of the Webinar deals with Official Language of the Union and the State read conjointly with the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution.
This document summarizes key cases related to the Indian Constitution. It provides a brief overview of 17 cases, including the articles of the constitution involved, the main issues addressed, and the key decisions. Some of the notable cases discussed include Keshavananda Bharti v. State of Kerala which established the basic structure doctrine, S.R. Bommai v. UOI regarding presidential rule under Article 356, and S.P. Gupta v. Union of India which laid the foundation for public interest litigation in India. The document serves as a useful reference for understanding important Supreme Court rulings that have shaped Indian constitutional law.
This document summarizes key cases related to the Indian Constitution. It provides a brief overview of 17 cases, including the articles of the constitution involved, the main issues addressed, and the key decisions. Some of the notable cases discussed include Keshavananda Bharti v. State of Kerala which established the basic structure doctrine, S.R. Bommai v. UOI regarding presidential rule under Article 356, and S.P. Gupta v. Union of India which laid the foundation for public interest litigation in India. The document serves as a useful reference for understanding important precedents related to interpreting different aspects of the Indian constitution.
The document discusses the process for amending the Constitution of India according to Article 368. It states that amendments can be introduced as a bill in either house of Parliament and must pass each house with a two-thirds majority and majority of members present. For amendments concerning federal powers, half the state legislatures must also ratify it with a simple majority. The president must then give assent for the bill to become a constitutional amendment act.
The document discusses emergency provisions under the Constitution of India from Articles 352 to 360. It describes the different types of emergencies - National Emergency (Article 352), State Emergency or President's Rule (Article 356), and Financial Emergency (Article 360). It outlines the circumstances and processes for declaring each type of emergency and the special powers the President acquires during emergencies, including the ability to suspend some fundamental rights. It also discusses the effects of emergency declarations on the central and state governments and legislatures.
The document provides a summary of 22 questions related to the Constitution of India. It discusses key topics like fundamental rights vs directive principles, the basic structure doctrine, emergency provisions, distribution of legislative powers between the centre and states, judicial review and writ jurisdiction. The questions cover topics like the number of lists in the Constitution, tax powers, citizenship rights, amendments and the roles of different courts.
Administrative relations between center and state from Article 256-263 during general ties, and from Article 352-360 during emergency and other provisions reflecting center state relations and predominance of Union government in India.
The document outlines some key provisions in Part I of the Constitution of India regarding the territory of India and establishment of new states. It specifies that India shall be a union of states, lists the current states and territories in the First Schedule, and allows Parliament to admit new states or alter existing states by law. It also provides that any such law shall include amendments to relevant Schedules and may contain supplemental provisions regarding representation in Parliament.
The 44th amendment to the Indian Constitution aimed to remove distortions introduced by the 42nd amendment. It sought to safeguard the secular and democratic character of the Constitution, and protect fundamental rights and free elections. Specifically, it restored the powers of the Supreme Court and High Courts. It also modified emergency provisions to prevent future misuse, including requiring Cabinet approval and more stringent parliamentary approval processes for declaring emergencies. The amendment further protected the rights to life and liberty during emergencies.
Believers IAS Academy provides theBest IAS Coaching in Bangalore with quality mentoring. We offer online and offline classes for aspirants with relevant study materials, excellent guidance from experienced faculty, and weekly tests to improve their skills. We are the Best IAS Coaching Centers in Bangalore.
1. The document discusses industrial design and its protection through registration under the Designs Act, 2000 in India. It provides definitions of industrial design, shape, configuration, pattern, and ornament.
2. Requirements for design registration include the design must be new or original, applied to an article through industrial process, and appeal solely to the eye. Registering a design provides exclusive rights over its use.
3. Piracy of registered designs is prohibited under law. Remedies for infringement include compensation up to INR 50,000 and permanent injunction through court orders.
This document describes an experiment to determine the acidity of a water sample. The experiment involves titrating the water sample with a standard sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution using two different acid-base indicators - methyl orange and phenolphthalein. The titration with methyl orange determines the mineral acidity as mg/L of calcium carbonate (CaCO3), while titration with phenolphthalein determines the total acidity, including carbonic acid, as mg/L of CaCO3. The procedure, observations, and calculations for determining the mineral and total acidity are provided.
partial replacement of aggregates by recycled concreteSHAHIDBASHIRMALIK
This document discusses innovative green concrete made through partial replacement of aggregates with recycled concrete. Green concrete reduces environmental impact by using less energy in production and emitting less carbon dioxide than traditional concrete. It can be made by replacing up to 15% of aggregates with recycled concrete without affecting the concrete's compressive strength after 28 days. Potential applications of green concrete include construction of bridges, buildings, columns, and roads.
Huge water wasted while cleaning our vehicles everydaySHAHIDBASHIRMALIK
This document discusses ways to reduce water usage when cleaning vehicles. It notes that washing a single car uses around 70% of the water a person consumes in their lifetime. Various methods are presented to reduce water usage for car washing, including using buckets instead of hoses, driving to automated car washes, and waterless cleaning techniques. The document encourages implementing these solutions at home over a week to see their impact on water savings.
GPS uses 24 satellites that orbit the Earth twice a day to transmit navigation signals. GPS receivers triangulate their position by measuring the time delay of signals from multiple satellites. This allows the receiver to calculate distances to the satellites and determine its position on Earth through trilateration. Differential correction improves accuracy by comparing mobile receiver data to that of a fixed base station. GPS has many applications including vehicle navigation systems, tracking devices, and intelligent transportation systems.
This document discusses financial management in construction projects. It begins by defining financial management and its importance in construction. It then describes a case study of a construction project to build a hostel building in Osmania University, Hyderabad. Primavera software is used to plan, schedule, and track the project by defining activities, assigning relationships between activities, setting a baseline schedule and budget, and using earned value analysis to monitor progress. The results found the project is on schedule but over budget, and Primavera allows effective financial and work management of construction projects.
This document discusses Critical Path Method (CPM) network analysis and problems. It provides an introduction to CPM, describing how it was developed and the key differences between CPM and PERT. The document then presents benefits and applications of CPM, limitations, basic steps, how to represent a network diagram, and defines key terms. It concludes with an example problem demonstrating how to identify the critical path through a network.
The document discusses the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) program in India which aims to provide all-weather road connectivity to rural villages. Key points:
- PMGSY was launched in 2000 to provide roads to villages of certain populations by certain years. As of 2017, 82% of targeted villages were connected.
- An online monitoring system called OMMAS tracks road development progress and expenses.
- The program has helped change lifestyles in some villages by facilitating transportation but may not have significantly impacted economic opportunities in remote areas according to one study.
The document discusses the use of space technology in telemedicine. It outlines how space applications can help expand telemedicine services to rural areas in India by overcoming issues like lack of infrastructure and healthcare professionals. Some key benefits of using space technology include improving access to healthcare for remote populations and helping address India's shortage of doctors and nurses. The document also examines some challenges of implementing telemedicine via space and provides examples of existing initiatives in India.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...lawyersonia
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
SPECIAL STATUS FOR J&K
1. RV College of
Engineering
Go, change the
world
SPECIAL STATUS TO J&K
ARTICLE 370 & 35-A
SHAHID BASHIR MALIK (1RV19CV410)
1
09-02-
2022
Constitution of India and Professional
Ethics
2. RV College of
Engineering
Go, change the
world
SPECIAL STATUS TO J&K
2
1. Part XXI of the Constitution of India, which deals
with "Temporary, Transitional and Special provisions".
2. Article 370- Special status has been given to Jammu & Kashmir.
3.Article 370 made Jammu and Kashmir a country within a country, with
its own flag, emblem, constitution and Sadr-i Riyasat (Prime Minister).
09-02-2022 Constitution of India and Professional Ethics
3. RV College of
Engineering
Go, change the
world
HISTORICAL ASPECT
J&K chose to remain independent at the time of India, Pakistan
Independence.
An agreement was entered by J&K with Pakistan and India that none of them
will attack J&K. While India respected the agreement and exercised restraint,
Pakistan attacked Kashmir in a bid to annex it by force.
On 6th October 1947, Kashmir was attacked by "Azad Kashmir Forces"
supported by Pakistan. To save J&K, the then ruler Maharaja Hari Singh
chose to accede J&K to India.
In October 1947, the accession was made by the ruler in favour of India in
consideration of certain commitments made by Pt. Jawahar Lal Nehru (the
then Prime Minister of India). It was in the pursuance of those commitments
that Article 370 was incorporated in the Constitution.
Constitution of India and Professional Ethics
09-02-2022 3
5. RV College of
Engineering
Go, change the
world
WHAT IS ARTICLE 370?
Temporary provision in the Indian Constitution.
The Ruler of Jammu and Kashmir signed the instrument of accession whereby only three subjects
were surrendered by the State to the Dominion of India.
1. External affairs
2. Defense and
3. Communications
The State enjoys a greater measure of autonomy and the power of the Union of India is restricted,
as regards other States.
The Union of India is incompetent to declare financial emergency and emergency in case of failing
of constitutional machinery with respect to the State of J&K.
Only emergency due to War or External Aggression can be declared as it is within the scope of
"Defense" as surrendered to the Union of India.
Constitution of India and Professional Ethics
09-02-2022 5
6. RV College of
Engineering
Go, change the
world
CONT..
Union Legislature can not legislate the provided the Union and
Concurrent which not accordance with subjects provided
instrument
The consultation Government required any matter that affects
State.
It can issue independently only it somehow related three subjects
surrendered those expressly mentioned instrument accession.
Constitution of India and Professional Ethics
09-02-2022 6
7. RV College of
Engineering
Go, change the
world
ATRICLE 35 A
Article 35A
Article 35A was introduced through a presidential order in 1954 to
continue the old provision of the territory regulation under Article
370 of the Indian constitution.
The article permits the local legislature in Indian administered
Kashmir to define permanent residents of the region.
It forbids outsiders from permanently settling, buying land,
holding local government jobs or winning education scholarships in
the region.
If a woman marriage a man in other Indian state, she loses her
citizenship. Whereas if any woman marriages a pakistani, she will
be entitled to have a citizenship of J&K.
Constitution of India and Professional Ethics
09-02-2022 7
.
8. RV College of
Engineering
Go, change the
world
TEXT OF ART. 370
Constitution of India and Professional Ethics
09-02-2022 8
10. RV College of
Engineering
Go, change the
world
SPECIAL FEATURES
SEPARATE CONSTITUTION
J&K is the only state in India which has a Constitution of its
own.
The Constitution of J&K was enacted by a separate
Constituent Assembly set up by the State and it came into
force on 26th January, 1957.
Constitution of India and Professional Ethics
09-02-2022 10
11. RV College of
Engineering
Go, change the
world
SPECIAL FEATURES
Jurisdiction of Parliament
Limited jurisdiction in case of J&K as compared to other states.
Till 1963, Parliament could legislate on subjects contained in the Union List,
and had no jurisdiction in case of Concurrent List under 7th Schedule of the
Constitution. But now, the Parliament has power to legislate not just on
subjects contained in the Union List but also on some of the subjects of
Concurrent List.
Residuary powers, unlike other states, rest with J&K.
The Parliament has no power to legislate Preventive Detention laws for the
state; only the state legislature has the power to do so.
Constitution of India and Professional Ethics
09-02-2022 11
12. RV College of
Engineering
Go, change the
world
SPECIAL FEATURES
Residuary powers, unlike other states, rest with J&K.
The Parliament has no power to legislate Preventive Detention laws for the
state; only the state legislature has the power to do so.
Autonomy in certain matters
Any action of the Union Legislature or Union Executive which results in
alteration of the name or territories or an international treaty or agreement
affecting the disposition of any part of the territory of the state requires the
consent of the State Legislature or the State Executive (as the case may be) to
be effective.
The Union has no power to suspend the Constitution of J&K.
Constitution of India and Professional Ethics
09-02-2022 12
13. RV College of
Engineering
Go, change the
world
SPECIAL FEATURES
Emergency Provisions
The Union of India has no power to declare Financial Emergency under Article 360 in the
state.
The Union can declare emergency in the state only in case of War or External Aggression.
No proclamation of emergency made on the grounds of internal disturbance or imminent
danger thereof shall have effect in relation to the state unless
(a) it is made at the request or with the concurrence of the government of the state; or
(b) where it has not been so made, it is applied subsequently by the President to that state at
the request or with the concurrence of the government of that static.
Fundamental Duties, Directive Principles & Fundamental Rights
Constitution of India and Professional Ethics
09-02-2022 13
14. RV College of
Engineering
Go, change the
world
SPECIAL FEATURES
Fundamental Duties, Directive Principles & Fundamental Rights
Part IV (Directive Principles of the State Policy) and Part IVA
(Fundamental Duties) of the Constitution are not applicable to
J&K.
Part III (Fundamental Rights) In addition to other fundamental
rights, Articles 19(1)(f) and 31(2) of the Constitution are still
applicable to J&K; hence the Fundamental Right to property is
still guaranteed in this state.
Constitution of India and Professional Ethics
09-02-2022 14
15. RV College of
Engineering
Go, change the
world
SPECIAL FEATURES
High Court of J&K
The High Court of J&K has limited powers as compared to other
High Courts within India. It can't declare any law unconstitutional.
Unlike High Courts in other states, under Article 226 of the
Constitution, it can't issue writs except for enforcement of
Fundamental Rights.
Constitution of India and Professional Ethics
09-02-2022 15
16. RV College of
Engineering
Go, change the
world
SPECIAL FEATURES
Official Languages
Provisions of Part XVII of the Constitution apply to J&K only insofar as they
relate to, (i) the official language of the Union;
(ii) the official language for communication between one state and another; or
between a state and the Union; and (iii) language of the proceedings in the
Supreme Court.
Urdu is the official language of the state but use of English is permitted for
official purposes unless the state legislature provides otherwise.
Constitution of India and Professional Ethics
09-02-2022 16
17. RV College of
Engineering
Go, change the
world
SPECIAL FEATURES
Procedure for Amendment of State Constitution
The Provisions of the State Constitution (except those relating to
the relationship of the state with the Union) may be amended by an
Act of the Legislative Assembly of the state passed by not less than
two-thirds of its membership.
If such amendment seeks to affect Governor or Election
Commission, it needs President's assent to come into effect. No
amendment of the Constitution of India shall extend to J&K unless
so extended by an order of the President under Article 370(1).
Constitution of India and Professional Ethics
09-02-2022 17
18. RV College of
Engineering
Go, change the
world
Demand for Abrogation of Article 370
Arguments for Abrogation of Article 370:
It has created certain psychological barriers. It is the root cause of all the
problems in J&K.
It is this Article 370 which encourages secession activities within J&K and
other parts of the country.
It was a temporary arrangement which was supposed to erode gradually.
It acts as a constant reminder to the Muslims of JAK That they have still to
merge with the country,
Constitution of India and Professional Ethics
09-02-2022 18
19. RV College of
Engineering
Go, change the
world
Demand for Abrogation of Article 370
Arguments for Abrogation of Article 370:
It has created certain psychological barriers. It is the root cause of all the
problems in J&K.
It is this Article 370 which encourages secession activities within J&K and
other parts of the country.
It was a temporary arrangement which was supposed to erode gradually.
It acts as a constant reminder to the Muslims of JAK That they have still to
merge with the country,
Constitution of India and Professional Ethics
09-02-2022 19
20. RV College of
Engineering
Go, change the
world
Abrogation of Article 370 & 35-A
By the prudential order, On 5 August 2019 at
around 11:30,in the Rajya Sabha, That Union
Home Minister Amit Shah announced the proposal
to revoke Article 370 and 35A in Jammu & Kashmir
under the supervision of Prime Minister
Narendra Modi.
Now J&K have no own flag
Now, J&K people have only one citizenship, that is Indian Citizenship.
There are no more separate constitution.
Constitution of India and Professional Ethics
09-02-2022 20
21. RV College of
Engineering
Go, change the
world
Abrogation of Article 370 & 35-A
Legislative assembly only for 5 years (before 6 years)
Now all Supreme Court orders are applicable in J&K.
Now all Indian citizen can buy land in J&K. There will be no more
separate law for the citizen of J&K.
J&K become union territory with legislature while Ladakh
becomes Union territory without any legislature.
Constitution of India and Professional Ethics
09-02-2022 21
22. RV College of
Engineering
Go, change the
world
Challenge to abrogation of Article 370
A total of 23 petitions challenging the central government’s decision to abrogate
Article 370 of the Constitution, thereby revoking Kashmir’s special status, are
pending in the Supreme Court.
These petitions were heard by a Constitution bench led by justice NV Ramana last
December and in January.
Some parties to the case requested the case should be referred to a larger bench of
seven or more judges. This, they argued, was because two earlier Supreme Court
judgments – Prem Nath Kaul (1959) and Sampat Prakash (1968) – are at
loggerheads on the scope and intent of Article 370, and whether the provision was
intended to be temporary, transitory or permanent. Since both judgments were
delivered by benches of five judges, the parties asked the court to refer the matter
to a larger bench.
Constitution of India and Professional Ethics
09-02-2022 22
23. RV College of
Engineering
Go, change the
world
PENDING CASES IN SC
the 5-judge bench refused to refer the pleas challenging the abrogation of Article 370
to a larger bench
The 5-judge Constitution bench of NV Ramana, SK Kaul, R. Subhash Reddy, BR Gavai
and Surya Kant, JJ has refused to refer the petitions challenging the constitutional validity
of the Centre’s move to abrogate Article 370 to a larger bench.
The Court was hearing the limited issue regarding the reference being made to a larger
bench in the light of the fact that in the case of Prem Nath Kaul v State of Jammu and
Kashmir, after considering the various issues, held that Article 370 was temporary in
nature, however, the subsequent judgment of Sampat Prakash v. State of Jammu and
Kashmir, reversed the aforesaid position, recognizing Article 370 as a permanent provision
giving perennial power to the President to regulate the relationship between the Union and
the State.
Constitution of India and Professional Ethics
09-02-2022 23
24. RV College of
Engineering
Go, change the
world
CONT..
Holding that there is no conflict between the judgments in the Prem Nath Kaul case and
the Sampat Prakash case, the bench said that judgments cannot be interpreted in a vacuum,
separate from their facts and context. Observations made in a judgment cannot be
selectively picked in order to give them a particular meaning. It noted,
“the Constitution Bench in the Prem Nath Kaul case did not discuss the continuation
or cessation of the operation of Article 370 of the Constitution after the dissolution of
the Constituent Assembly of the State. This was not an issue in question before the
Court, unlike in the Sampat Prakash case where the contention was specifically made
before, and refuted by, the Court. This Court sees no reason to read into the Prem
Nath Kaul case an interpretation which results in it being in conflict with the
subsequent judgments of this Court, particularly when an ordinary reading of the
judgment does not result in such an interpretation.”
Constitution of India and Professional Ethics
09-02-2022 24
25. RV College of
Engineering
Go, change the
world
CONT..
The bench, further, explained that the Court, in the Prem Nath Kaul case, had to determine
the legislative competence of the Yuvaraj, in passing a particular enactment. The enactment
was passed during the interregnum period, before the formulation of the Constitution of
State of Jammu and Kashmir, but after coming into force of the Constitution of India. The
observations made by the Constitution Bench in this case, regarding the importance given to
the decision of the Constituent Assembly of the State of Jammu and Kashmir needs to be
read in the light of these facts,
“the framework of Article 370(2) of the Indian Constitution was such that any
decision taken by the State Government, which was not an elected body but the
Maharaja of the State acting on the advice of the Council of Ministers which was in
office by virtue of the Maharaja’s proclamation dated March 5, 1948, prior to the
sitting of the Constituent Assembly of the State, would have to be placed before the
Constituent Assembly, for its decision.”
Constitution of India and Professional Ethics
09-02-2022 25
26. RV College of
Engineering
Go, change the
world
CONT..
Explaining the rationale behind such framework, the Court said that as the task of the
Constituent Assembly was to further clarify the scope and ambit of the constitutional
relationship between the Union of India and the State of Jammu and Kashmir, on which the
State Government as defined under Article 370 might have already taken some decisions,
before the convening of the Constituent Assembly, which the Constituent Assembly in its
wisdom, might ultimately not agree with.,
“Hence, the Court in the case of Prem Nath Kaul (supra) indicated that the
Constituent Assembly’s decision under Article 370(2) was final. This finality has to be
read as being limited to those decisions taken by the State Government under Article
370 prior to the convening of the Constituent Assembly of the State, in line with the
language of Article 370(2).”
Constitution of India and Professional Ethics
09-02-2022 26