SOC 208
Social Change and Development
PhD Fatma Altınbas Sarıgül
The Development Project
□ When colonies became independent nation-
states, they joined the international relations of
the development project.
□ The national economic strategies of the new
nation-states, depended on the new
international economic arrangements.
□ Newly independent states:
□ Had colonial division of labor’s legacy of “resource
bondage” embedded in their social structures
□ Purchased First World technology with loans or
primary export earnings
□ Integrated into universal political-economic relations
within the international financial, normative and legal
framework of United Nations and Bretton Woods
institutions
© Sage Publications, 2011.
Development Project: Key
Ingredients
□ Universal claims
□ National economic growth
□ International military and economic aid
□ Bound the developing world to developed
world and secured access to human and
natural resources
□ Industrial growth
□ Agro-industrialization
□ Political alliances for supporting industrial
growth
□ New inequalities spread through markets
© Sage Publications, 2011.
U.S. Bilateralism: The Marshall Plan
□ After World War II, U.S. transferred billions to
Europe and Japan to facilitate international
trade and encourage U.S. direct investment
in Europe
□ Bilateral financial aid
□ To stabilize discontented populations
□ To rekindle economic growth and production
□ To restore trade and price stability
□ To contain socialist movements and communism
□ To allow purchase of U.S. goods
□ To rearm © Sage Publications, 2011.
Multilateralism: Bretton Woods
System
□ Post-WWII meeting in Bretton Woods, NH, July 1944
□ Financial ministers created international banking
system to restore trade via credit to devastated
regions
□ The World Bank
□ Borrowed money in international capital markets to raise
money for development
□ Loaned funds to states for national infrastructure projects
(dams, highways, power plants)
□ Invested in cash crop agriculture, which deepened legacy
of colonial division of labor
□ International Monetary Fund (IMF)
□ Disbursed credit to stabilize national currency exchanges
and revitalize international trade
© Sage Publications, 2011.
The Functions of Bretton Woods
Institutions
□ To stabilize national finances and
revitalize international trade
□ To underwrite national economic growth
by funding Third World imports of First
World infrastructural technologies
□ To expand Third World primary exports to
earn foreign currency for purchasing First
World exports.
© Sage Publications, 2011.
First World Imprint on Bretton
Woods Institutions
□ World Bank policy reflected First World
priorities:
□ Investments in energy, export agriculture, large-
scale capital-intensive projects
□ Sponsored Western technology transfer
□ Encouraged import dependence
□ Established institutional presence in Third World
□ Multilateralism, World Bank style, set the
parameters for development
□ IMF “conditionality” required (Third World)
states to adopt specific economic policies,
which became criteria for other lenders
© Sage Publications, 2011.
First World Imprint on Bretton
Woods Institutions
□ In governance
□ World Bank is controlled by five biggest
shareholders.
□Overwhelming male representation still exists
□ U.S. administration selects the President of
World Bank
□ Largest European nations appoint
Managing Director of IMF
© Sage Publications, 2011.
First World Imprint on Bretton
Woods Institutions
□ The World Bank has emphasized
‘productive’ investments, such as
energy and export agriculture, rather
than ‘social’ investments such as
education, health services, water and
sanitation facilities and housing.
□ The World Banks sponsored Western
technology transfer and established a
local center in Third World countries.
© Sage Publications, 2011.
Politics of the Postwar World Order
□ Cold War rivalries:
□ Soviet Union expanded economic and political
relations with Third World, created aid for
strategic states, favoring those who pursued
policies of central planning and public ownership
□ United States/allies aid stabilized strategic states
and undercut rival (socialist) ideologies
□ Iran, Turkey, Israel, India, Pakistan, South Vietnam,
Taiwan, South Korea, Philippines, Thailand, Laos
□ Selectivity of aid contradicted the espoused
universalism of the development project
© Sage Publications, 2011.
The Non-Aligned Movement
(NAM)
□ “Nonaligned” Asian and African states met in 1955
at Bandung, Indonesia
□ Articulated philosophy of noninterference in international
relations; economic self-reliance
□ Questioned legitimacy of development model
□ Demanded more loans and concessions for Third World
□ Key players: Indonesia (Sukharno), India (Nehru), Ghana
(Nkrumah), Vietnam (Ho Chi Minh), Egypt (Nasser), and
China (Zhou Enlai)
□ First World Response:
Created a new subsidiary of the World Bank, the
International Development Association (IDA), and regional
banks (Inter-American Development Bank, African
Development Bank, Asian Development Bank). Made
loans at discounted rates.
© Sage Publications, 2011.
The Group of 77
□ 1947 General Agreement on Tariffs and
Trade
□ Enabled states to negotiate reciprocal trade
concessions, but without adjusting for the uneven
effects of colonialism.
□ During the 1950s, the Third World’s share of world
trade fell from one-third to almost one-fifth.
□ Third World pressure founded United Nations
Conference on Trade and Development in
1964
□ Caucusing as the Group of 77 (G-77), they
demanded world-economic reforms
© Sage Publications, 2011.
The Group of 77
□ Goals
□ Stabilize and improve primary commodity prices
□ Open First World markets to Third World
manufactures
□ Expand financial flows from the First World
□ Impact of UNCTAD
□ Spread “Third Worldist” perspective
□ World Bank president Robert McNamara (1968-81)
refocused development (for a time) on quality of
life issues rather than simply income measures
□ “growth with equity”
© Sage Publications, 2011.
Remaking the International
Division of Labor
□ By 1980, exports from Third World included
more manufactured goods than raw
materials
□ ISI protected Third World “infant” industries
□ The First World exported 36% more primary
commodities than the Third World
□ Farm subsidies protected First World agriculture
© Sage Publications, 2011.
Newly Industrializing Countries
(NICs)
□ Legitimized the development project with
rising living standards and upward mobility
□ Demonstrated selectivity of the project
□ Cornered bulk of private foreign investment and
(Cold War driven) military aid sustaining
authoritarian regimes
□ Concentrated on export production of textiles and
electronics and industrial growth
□ 50% of increased value in Third World
manufacturing occurred in 4 countries
□ But, 2/3 of increase in 8 countries
© Sage Publications, 2011.
The Food-Aid Regime
□ The post-war U.S. agro-industrial model:
□ Used public-supported technological support
□ Specialized in one or two commodities
□ Protected farm goods with tariffs and subsidies
□ Set prices for farm goods above world market
prices
□ Routinely over-produced
□ Surpluses were sent to Third World as food
aid
□ These subsidized Third World wages
□ Stimulated Third World urban industrial sectors
© Sage Publications, 2011.
Food Dependency
□ Cheaper for Third World governments to
import subsidized wheat than to fund
production, transport and distribution of
local food
□ Per capita consumption of wheat rose by nearly
2/3 and all cereals (except wheat) by 20 percent
□ Traditional “peasant foods” replaced by new
“wage foods” (grains and processed foods)
□ Erosion of peasant agriculture
□ Industrial labor force expanded as small
producers moved to cities for low-wage jobs
© Sage Publications, 2011.
The Global Livestock Complex
□ “Dietary modernization” resulted from food-
aid policy as much as rising incomes
□ Growing commodity chains linked feed
producers with animal protein producers
globally
□ Surplus imported grain was cheap enough
to feed livestock
□ More affluent Third World consumers shifted from
eating grain to animal protein
© Sage Publications, 2011.
Does Feed Grain Trade Change Diets?
□ Dietary differentiation reflects who controls
production of certain foods and class
differences in consumption patterns
□ Example: In Egypt, rising incomes and
government subsidies fostered a switch from
legumes and maize to wheat and meat
products.
□ Wealthy consumers dine on animal protein;
working poor dine either on food aid grains, low-
protein starchy diets, or little at all.
□ It is not “natural” for people with rising incomes to
eat more meat
© Sage Publications, 2011.
The Green Revolution
□ A “package” of plant-breeding agricultural
technologies that increased production of
corn, wheat and beans by 300% from 1943
to 1963.
□ Stimulated by fear of population growth
□ Political pressure to convert wartime
nitrogen production and nerve gases to
inorganic fertilizer and insecticides
□ Technologies developed by the Rockefeller
and Ford Foundations in Mexico, Philippines,
Nigeria, Colombia
□ Promoted by U.S. land grant university system
and large, capitalized farmers
© Sage Publications, 2011.
Development Project: Anti-rural
Biases
□ Third World governments’ development policies
systematically privileged urban interests
□ expressed a modernist belief in peasant
redundancy
□ Growing rural poverty and marginalization
stimulated the land reform movement
□ U.S. Alliance for Progress (1961) Program
coordinated nationally-planned agrarian reform
across Latin America
□ to undercut insurgencies
□ to stabilize rural populations via a U.S.-inspired
family farming model
© Sage Publications, 2011.
Results of Land Reforms
□ Land reforms exempted commercialized
farmland and resettled people on remaining
frontier lands
□ Resettlement privileged males, excluded women,
relocated rural poverty and destroyed tropical
forests
□ Persistent rural poverty in 1960s led World
Bank to devise a new poverty alleviation
program of credit for smallholding peasants
to stabilize rural populations,
□ Program met with mixed success
© Sage Publications, 2011.
The “Planet of Slums”
□ Long-term assault on peasant agriculture
has continued through colonialism, food
dumping, and institutional support of
commercial and export agriculture
□ Result: “Planet of slums” as displaced
peasants migrate to overcrowded urban
centers in Latin America, Asia, Africa
□ Lesson: Neither resettlement of peasants nor
their integration into monetary relations is a
sustainable substitute for supporting agro-
ecological methods
© Sage Publications, 2011.
Summary
□ The Third World was incorporated into a
singular project, despite variations, through
military and economic aid, technological
transfer, and food subsidies
□ Food aid reshaped international division of
labor
□ As First World agriculture expanded, new
industrial classes emerged in the Third World
□ Green revolution technologies stimulated social
differentiation, urban migration and relocation of
industrial jobs to the Third World
© Sage Publications, 2011.

Soc 222 4

  • 1.
    SOC 208 Social Changeand Development PhD Fatma Altınbas Sarıgül
  • 2.
    The Development Project □When colonies became independent nation- states, they joined the international relations of the development project. □ The national economic strategies of the new nation-states, depended on the new international economic arrangements. □ Newly independent states: □ Had colonial division of labor’s legacy of “resource bondage” embedded in their social structures □ Purchased First World technology with loans or primary export earnings □ Integrated into universal political-economic relations within the international financial, normative and legal framework of United Nations and Bretton Woods institutions © Sage Publications, 2011.
  • 3.
    Development Project: Key Ingredients □Universal claims □ National economic growth □ International military and economic aid □ Bound the developing world to developed world and secured access to human and natural resources □ Industrial growth □ Agro-industrialization □ Political alliances for supporting industrial growth □ New inequalities spread through markets © Sage Publications, 2011.
  • 4.
    U.S. Bilateralism: TheMarshall Plan □ After World War II, U.S. transferred billions to Europe and Japan to facilitate international trade and encourage U.S. direct investment in Europe □ Bilateral financial aid □ To stabilize discontented populations □ To rekindle economic growth and production □ To restore trade and price stability □ To contain socialist movements and communism □ To allow purchase of U.S. goods □ To rearm © Sage Publications, 2011.
  • 5.
    Multilateralism: Bretton Woods System □Post-WWII meeting in Bretton Woods, NH, July 1944 □ Financial ministers created international banking system to restore trade via credit to devastated regions □ The World Bank □ Borrowed money in international capital markets to raise money for development □ Loaned funds to states for national infrastructure projects (dams, highways, power plants) □ Invested in cash crop agriculture, which deepened legacy of colonial division of labor □ International Monetary Fund (IMF) □ Disbursed credit to stabilize national currency exchanges and revitalize international trade © Sage Publications, 2011.
  • 6.
    The Functions ofBretton Woods Institutions □ To stabilize national finances and revitalize international trade □ To underwrite national economic growth by funding Third World imports of First World infrastructural technologies □ To expand Third World primary exports to earn foreign currency for purchasing First World exports. © Sage Publications, 2011.
  • 7.
    First World Imprinton Bretton Woods Institutions □ World Bank policy reflected First World priorities: □ Investments in energy, export agriculture, large- scale capital-intensive projects □ Sponsored Western technology transfer □ Encouraged import dependence □ Established institutional presence in Third World □ Multilateralism, World Bank style, set the parameters for development □ IMF “conditionality” required (Third World) states to adopt specific economic policies, which became criteria for other lenders © Sage Publications, 2011.
  • 8.
    First World Imprinton Bretton Woods Institutions □ In governance □ World Bank is controlled by five biggest shareholders. □Overwhelming male representation still exists □ U.S. administration selects the President of World Bank □ Largest European nations appoint Managing Director of IMF © Sage Publications, 2011.
  • 9.
    First World Imprinton Bretton Woods Institutions □ The World Bank has emphasized ‘productive’ investments, such as energy and export agriculture, rather than ‘social’ investments such as education, health services, water and sanitation facilities and housing. □ The World Banks sponsored Western technology transfer and established a local center in Third World countries. © Sage Publications, 2011.
  • 10.
    Politics of thePostwar World Order □ Cold War rivalries: □ Soviet Union expanded economic and political relations with Third World, created aid for strategic states, favoring those who pursued policies of central planning and public ownership □ United States/allies aid stabilized strategic states and undercut rival (socialist) ideologies □ Iran, Turkey, Israel, India, Pakistan, South Vietnam, Taiwan, South Korea, Philippines, Thailand, Laos □ Selectivity of aid contradicted the espoused universalism of the development project © Sage Publications, 2011.
  • 11.
    The Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) □“Nonaligned” Asian and African states met in 1955 at Bandung, Indonesia □ Articulated philosophy of noninterference in international relations; economic self-reliance □ Questioned legitimacy of development model □ Demanded more loans and concessions for Third World □ Key players: Indonesia (Sukharno), India (Nehru), Ghana (Nkrumah), Vietnam (Ho Chi Minh), Egypt (Nasser), and China (Zhou Enlai) □ First World Response: Created a new subsidiary of the World Bank, the International Development Association (IDA), and regional banks (Inter-American Development Bank, African Development Bank, Asian Development Bank). Made loans at discounted rates. © Sage Publications, 2011.
  • 12.
    The Group of77 □ 1947 General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade □ Enabled states to negotiate reciprocal trade concessions, but without adjusting for the uneven effects of colonialism. □ During the 1950s, the Third World’s share of world trade fell from one-third to almost one-fifth. □ Third World pressure founded United Nations Conference on Trade and Development in 1964 □ Caucusing as the Group of 77 (G-77), they demanded world-economic reforms © Sage Publications, 2011.
  • 13.
    The Group of77 □ Goals □ Stabilize and improve primary commodity prices □ Open First World markets to Third World manufactures □ Expand financial flows from the First World □ Impact of UNCTAD □ Spread “Third Worldist” perspective □ World Bank president Robert McNamara (1968-81) refocused development (for a time) on quality of life issues rather than simply income measures □ “growth with equity” © Sage Publications, 2011.
  • 14.
    Remaking the International Divisionof Labor □ By 1980, exports from Third World included more manufactured goods than raw materials □ ISI protected Third World “infant” industries □ The First World exported 36% more primary commodities than the Third World □ Farm subsidies protected First World agriculture © Sage Publications, 2011.
  • 15.
    Newly Industrializing Countries (NICs) □Legitimized the development project with rising living standards and upward mobility □ Demonstrated selectivity of the project □ Cornered bulk of private foreign investment and (Cold War driven) military aid sustaining authoritarian regimes □ Concentrated on export production of textiles and electronics and industrial growth □ 50% of increased value in Third World manufacturing occurred in 4 countries □ But, 2/3 of increase in 8 countries © Sage Publications, 2011.
  • 16.
    The Food-Aid Regime □The post-war U.S. agro-industrial model: □ Used public-supported technological support □ Specialized in one or two commodities □ Protected farm goods with tariffs and subsidies □ Set prices for farm goods above world market prices □ Routinely over-produced □ Surpluses were sent to Third World as food aid □ These subsidized Third World wages □ Stimulated Third World urban industrial sectors © Sage Publications, 2011.
  • 17.
    Food Dependency □ Cheaperfor Third World governments to import subsidized wheat than to fund production, transport and distribution of local food □ Per capita consumption of wheat rose by nearly 2/3 and all cereals (except wheat) by 20 percent □ Traditional “peasant foods” replaced by new “wage foods” (grains and processed foods) □ Erosion of peasant agriculture □ Industrial labor force expanded as small producers moved to cities for low-wage jobs © Sage Publications, 2011.
  • 18.
    The Global LivestockComplex □ “Dietary modernization” resulted from food- aid policy as much as rising incomes □ Growing commodity chains linked feed producers with animal protein producers globally □ Surplus imported grain was cheap enough to feed livestock □ More affluent Third World consumers shifted from eating grain to animal protein © Sage Publications, 2011.
  • 19.
    Does Feed GrainTrade Change Diets? □ Dietary differentiation reflects who controls production of certain foods and class differences in consumption patterns □ Example: In Egypt, rising incomes and government subsidies fostered a switch from legumes and maize to wheat and meat products. □ Wealthy consumers dine on animal protein; working poor dine either on food aid grains, low- protein starchy diets, or little at all. □ It is not “natural” for people with rising incomes to eat more meat © Sage Publications, 2011.
  • 20.
    The Green Revolution □A “package” of plant-breeding agricultural technologies that increased production of corn, wheat and beans by 300% from 1943 to 1963. □ Stimulated by fear of population growth □ Political pressure to convert wartime nitrogen production and nerve gases to inorganic fertilizer and insecticides □ Technologies developed by the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations in Mexico, Philippines, Nigeria, Colombia □ Promoted by U.S. land grant university system and large, capitalized farmers © Sage Publications, 2011.
  • 21.
    Development Project: Anti-rural Biases □Third World governments’ development policies systematically privileged urban interests □ expressed a modernist belief in peasant redundancy □ Growing rural poverty and marginalization stimulated the land reform movement □ U.S. Alliance for Progress (1961) Program coordinated nationally-planned agrarian reform across Latin America □ to undercut insurgencies □ to stabilize rural populations via a U.S.-inspired family farming model © Sage Publications, 2011.
  • 22.
    Results of LandReforms □ Land reforms exempted commercialized farmland and resettled people on remaining frontier lands □ Resettlement privileged males, excluded women, relocated rural poverty and destroyed tropical forests □ Persistent rural poverty in 1960s led World Bank to devise a new poverty alleviation program of credit for smallholding peasants to stabilize rural populations, □ Program met with mixed success © Sage Publications, 2011.
  • 23.
    The “Planet ofSlums” □ Long-term assault on peasant agriculture has continued through colonialism, food dumping, and institutional support of commercial and export agriculture □ Result: “Planet of slums” as displaced peasants migrate to overcrowded urban centers in Latin America, Asia, Africa □ Lesson: Neither resettlement of peasants nor their integration into monetary relations is a sustainable substitute for supporting agro- ecological methods © Sage Publications, 2011.
  • 24.
    Summary □ The ThirdWorld was incorporated into a singular project, despite variations, through military and economic aid, technological transfer, and food subsidies □ Food aid reshaped international division of labor □ As First World agriculture expanded, new industrial classes emerged in the Third World □ Green revolution technologies stimulated social differentiation, urban migration and relocation of industrial jobs to the Third World © Sage Publications, 2011.

Editor's Notes

  • #18 Conventional understandings of development see these trends of food dependency as national, but the development project makes visible the international political economic framework that remade the international division of labor.