Smart Street Lighting System
• Energy-Efficient and Motion-Sensor Based
Street Lighting
• Presented by: [Your Name]
• Course: Smart City
Introduction
• Challenges of Traditional Lighting:
• - High energy consumption.
• - Limited adaptability to varying conditions.
• Why Smart Lighting?
• - Supports smart city objectives.
• - Improves energy efficiency and public safety.
Project Objectives
• 1. Replace traditional streetlights with LED
systems.
• 2. Incorporate motion sensors for adaptive
lighting.
• 3. Save energy while ensuring adequate
illumination.
Background
• - Smart Cities: Leveraging technology for
sustainable urban development.
• - Smart Lighting: Enhancing infrastructure
efficiency and sustainability.
• - Examples: Successful implementations in
Copenhagen and Barcelona.
Proposed System Overview
• Key Components:
• - LED lights.
• - Motion sensors.
• - Central monitoring system.
• Functionality: Adaptive lighting based on real-
time conditions.
System Features
• - Energy-efficient LEDs.
• - Motion-triggered brightness adjustments.
• - Weather-responsive illumination.
• - Data collection and remote monitoring.
Technical Design
• Block Diagram:
• - Motion sensors detect activity.
• - Controller adjusts light intensity.
• - Cloud platform for data processing.
Motion Sensor Selection
• Types Considered:
• - PIR sensors.
• - Ultrasonic sensors.
• - Microwave sensors.
• Chosen Sensor: Passive Infrared (PIR) for
reliability and cost-effectiveness.
System Operation
• 1. Normal Mode: Dim light during inactivity.
• 2. Motion Mode: Bright light upon detecting
movement.
• 3. Sequential Lighting: Activation of adjacent
lights for enhanced visibility.
Weather-Adaptive Lighting
• Sensors Used:
• - Light Dependent Resistors (LDRs).
• - Rain sensors.
• Behavior: Brightens during cloudy or adverse
weather conditions.
Energy Efficiency Calculations
• Comparison:
• - Traditional lighting: 150W/lamp.
• - LED with motion sensor: 40W idle, 100W
active.
• Sample Savings for 100 Lamps:
• - Daily: X kWh.
• - Monthly: Y kWh.
• - Yearly: Z kWh.
Cloud Monitoring System
• Data Collected:
• - Energy usage.
• - Motion patterns.
• - System diagnostics.
• Dashboard: Real-time monitoring and
reporting.
Implementation Plan
• 1. Pilot project with 100 lamps.
• 2. Install and configure sensors.
• 3. Integrate cloud-based monitoring.
• 4. Evaluate and optimize performance.
Budget Estimation
• LED Lamps: $X per unit.
• Sensors: $Y per unit.
• Cloud Infrastructure: $Z initial setup.
• Comparison: Initial investment vs. long-term
savings.
Environmental Impact
• Energy Savings: Reduced consumption by X%.
• Carbon Emissions: Lowered by Y metric tons
annually.
Case Study/Simulation
• Scenario: Comparison of one street with
traditional vs. smart lighting.
• Results:
• - Energy consumption reduced by X%.
• - Improved illumination during critical hours.
Challenges
• - Sensor calibration and sensitivity
adjustments.
• - High initial investment.
• - Maintenance and data security.
Future Enhancements
• AI Integration: Predictive maintenance and
adaptive lighting schedules.
• Solar Panels: Further reduce energy reliance.
• Expansion: Integrate with smart traffic and
safety systems.
Conclusion
• Summary of benefits:
• - Significant energy savings.
• - Enhanced public safety.
• - Contribution to sustainability goals.
• Scalability for widespread adoption.
References and Acknowledgments
• References: List of studies, articles, and tools
used.
• Acknowledgments: Thanks to professors,
peers, and collaborators.

Smart_Street_Lighting_System_in_enginering.pptx

  • 1.
    Smart Street LightingSystem • Energy-Efficient and Motion-Sensor Based Street Lighting • Presented by: [Your Name] • Course: Smart City
  • 2.
    Introduction • Challenges ofTraditional Lighting: • - High energy consumption. • - Limited adaptability to varying conditions. • Why Smart Lighting? • - Supports smart city objectives. • - Improves energy efficiency and public safety.
  • 3.
    Project Objectives • 1.Replace traditional streetlights with LED systems. • 2. Incorporate motion sensors for adaptive lighting. • 3. Save energy while ensuring adequate illumination.
  • 4.
    Background • - SmartCities: Leveraging technology for sustainable urban development. • - Smart Lighting: Enhancing infrastructure efficiency and sustainability. • - Examples: Successful implementations in Copenhagen and Barcelona.
  • 5.
    Proposed System Overview •Key Components: • - LED lights. • - Motion sensors. • - Central monitoring system. • Functionality: Adaptive lighting based on real- time conditions.
  • 6.
    System Features • -Energy-efficient LEDs. • - Motion-triggered brightness adjustments. • - Weather-responsive illumination. • - Data collection and remote monitoring.
  • 7.
    Technical Design • BlockDiagram: • - Motion sensors detect activity. • - Controller adjusts light intensity. • - Cloud platform for data processing.
  • 8.
    Motion Sensor Selection •Types Considered: • - PIR sensors. • - Ultrasonic sensors. • - Microwave sensors. • Chosen Sensor: Passive Infrared (PIR) for reliability and cost-effectiveness.
  • 9.
    System Operation • 1.Normal Mode: Dim light during inactivity. • 2. Motion Mode: Bright light upon detecting movement. • 3. Sequential Lighting: Activation of adjacent lights for enhanced visibility.
  • 10.
    Weather-Adaptive Lighting • SensorsUsed: • - Light Dependent Resistors (LDRs). • - Rain sensors. • Behavior: Brightens during cloudy or adverse weather conditions.
  • 11.
    Energy Efficiency Calculations •Comparison: • - Traditional lighting: 150W/lamp. • - LED with motion sensor: 40W idle, 100W active. • Sample Savings for 100 Lamps: • - Daily: X kWh. • - Monthly: Y kWh. • - Yearly: Z kWh.
  • 12.
    Cloud Monitoring System •Data Collected: • - Energy usage. • - Motion patterns. • - System diagnostics. • Dashboard: Real-time monitoring and reporting.
  • 13.
    Implementation Plan • 1.Pilot project with 100 lamps. • 2. Install and configure sensors. • 3. Integrate cloud-based monitoring. • 4. Evaluate and optimize performance.
  • 14.
    Budget Estimation • LEDLamps: $X per unit. • Sensors: $Y per unit. • Cloud Infrastructure: $Z initial setup. • Comparison: Initial investment vs. long-term savings.
  • 15.
    Environmental Impact • EnergySavings: Reduced consumption by X%. • Carbon Emissions: Lowered by Y metric tons annually.
  • 16.
    Case Study/Simulation • Scenario:Comparison of one street with traditional vs. smart lighting. • Results: • - Energy consumption reduced by X%. • - Improved illumination during critical hours.
  • 17.
    Challenges • - Sensorcalibration and sensitivity adjustments. • - High initial investment. • - Maintenance and data security.
  • 18.
    Future Enhancements • AIIntegration: Predictive maintenance and adaptive lighting schedules. • Solar Panels: Further reduce energy reliance. • Expansion: Integrate with smart traffic and safety systems.
  • 19.
    Conclusion • Summary ofbenefits: • - Significant energy savings. • - Enhanced public safety. • - Contribution to sustainability goals. • Scalability for widespread adoption.
  • 20.
    References and Acknowledgments •References: List of studies, articles, and tools used. • Acknowledgments: Thanks to professors, peers, and collaborators.