9. • CIO: Dr. Suchart Soranasataporn
• Developed HIS from scratch
• Started from MPI, OPD, IPD,
Pharmacy, Billing, etc.
• Platform: Visual FoxPro (UI, Logic,
Database)
1st Generation (~1987-2001)
11. • File-based DB, not real DBMS
– Performance Issues
• Not well designed indexing, concurrency controls
& access controls
• Indexes sensitive to network disruptions
• Single point of failures (no redundancy)
– Scalability Issues
• Database file size < 2GB
• Not service-oriented architecture
Some Limitations of Visual FoxPro
12. • Trials & errors
• Individuals or small teams
– Teams based on system modules
(OPD, IPD, Billing, etc.)
• Non-systematic, no documents
1st-Generation Development Process
13. • CIO: Dr. Piyamitr Sritara
• Developed CPOE for inpatients
medication orders
• Lab orders and lab results viewing
• Discharge summaries, etc.
• Enhanced existing HIS modules and add more
modules and departmental systems (e.g. LR, OR)
• Platform: Visual FoxPro (UI, Logic, Database)
2nd Generation (2001-2005)
14. • Java or .NET?
• Open/cost-effective
vs. timely
development
• Technology survival?
• Decision: Defer &
continue using
Visual FoxPro
2nd Generation (2001-2005)
http://thinkunlimited.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Fork_in_the_road_sign.jpg
15. • Small teams
– Teams based on system modules (OPD, IPD,
Billing, Pharmacy, Lab, etc.)
• Realized needs for systematic software
development process
• Started formal systems analysis & design
with some documents
2nd-Generation Development Process
16. • CIO: Dr. Artit Ungkanont
• Continued ongoing projects from
2nd Generation & implemented
– ERP, PACS
• Implemented commercial LIS
• Implemented self-developed web-
based “Doctor’s Portal”
3rd Generation (2005-2011)
17. • Architectural changes: Used middleware (web services,
JBOSS, JCAPS)
• Implemented data exchange of lab & ADT data using
HL7 v.2 & v.3 messaging
• Enhanced existing HIS & add more functions
• SDMC becomes operational (2011)
• Platform:
– Web [Mainly Java] (UI)
– Web services (Logic)
– Oracle & Microsoft SQL Server (Database)
• Legacy platform: Visual FoxPro (UI, Logic, Database)
3rd Generation (2005-2011)
18. • Small teams
– Teams based on system modules (OPD, IPD,
Billing, Pharmacy, Lab, etc.)
• Attempted systematic software
development process, with limited success
• Balancing quality development with timely
software delivery difficult
3rd-Generation Development Process
19. • CIO: Dr. Chusak Okaschareon
• Implemented CPOE for
outpatients (with gradual roll-out)
• Scanned Medical Records for
outpatients
• RamaEMR (portal & EMR viewer for
physicians and nurses in OPD)
• Business Intelligence Implementation
4th Generation (2011-2014)
20. • Achievements
– Certified CMMI Level 3
– Certified ISO 20000 (IT Service Management)
• Ongoing projects
– High-Performance Data Center & IT Services
– System Reliability & Security: Disaster Recovery &
Business Continuity Management
• Platform:
– Web [Mainly Java] (UI)
– Web services (Logic)
– Oracle & Microsoft SQL Server (Database)
4th Generation (2011-Present)
21. • Project-based development
• Roles of “Business Analysts”
• From “silo” teams to “pooled” resources
– Business Analysis Team
– Systems Analysis Team
– Development Team
– Testing Teams
4th-Generation Development Process
24. • CIO: Dr. Artit Ungkanont
• IT Strategies
– Fixing Pain Points
– Sustainable Infrastructure
– IT for Chakri Naruebodindra Medical
Institute (CNMI)
• Incremental Projects
• Software Development Process & Quality
• Plan: New HIS
5th Generation (2014-Present)
27. Front Office
Back Office
Data Warehouse &
Business Intelligence
Very High-Level Architecture
HR, Finance,
Materials
Management
(Procurement &
Inventory)
MPI, Insurance, ADT, OPD,
IPD, Critical Care IS, OR,
LIS, RIS & PACS, Pharmacy,
Billing, etc.
MUC-Net
48. Build or Buy
Build/Homegrown
• Full control of software &
data
• Requires local expertise
• Expertise
retention/knowledge
management is vital
• Maybe cost-effective if
high degree of local
customizations or long-
term projection
Buy/Outsource
• Less control of software &
data
• Requires vendor
competence
• Vendor relationship
management is vital
• Maybe cost-effective
if economies of scale or
few customizations
49. Does service offer
competitive advantage?
Is external delivery
reliable and lower cost?
Keep Internal
Keep Internal
OUTSOURCE!
Yes
No
Yes
No
From a University of Minnesota teaching slide by Nelson F. Granados, 2006
IT Outsourcing Decision Tree
50. Does service offer
competitive advantage?
Is external delivery
reliable and lower cost?
Keep Internal
Keep Internal
OUTSOURCE!
Yes
No
Yes
No
From a teaching slide by Nelson F. Granados, 2006
IT Outsourcing Decision
Tree: Ramathibodi’s Case
Core HIS, CPOE
Strategic advantages
• Agility due to local workflow accommodations
• Secondary data utilization (research, QI)
• Roadmap to national leader in informatics (internal “lab”)
External delivery unreliable
• Non-Core HIS,
External delivery higher cost
• ERP maintenance/ongoing
customization
ERP initial
implementation,
PACS, RIS,
Departmental
systems
51. IT Decision as “Marriage”
Image Source: http://charminarpearls.com/pearls/
55. • About 100+ IT professionals (1:80)
– Health informaticians
– Business analysts
– Systems analysts
– Software developers
– Software testers
– Project managers
– Systems & network administrators
– Engineers & technicians
– Data analysts
– Help desk / user support agents
– Supporting staff
• Ratios of IT vs Health from Western countries: 1:50 - 1:60
Ramathibodi IT Workforce
56. • First (and still the only) medical school in
Thailand with M.D., Ph.D. formally trained
in Health Informatics
• Return on investment (ROI) still to be
proven :)
Ramathibodi IT Workforce
64. • Restructuring IT teams very
helpful in effective & efficient
software development
• Quality of software reflects
quality of the team and process
Teams & Outcomes