This document contains an employee performance appraisal form for Shirley Bethea, an Administrative Assistant at the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). The form records the employee's performance objectives, progress reviews, ratings on primary performance elements, and an overall performance rating. It contains sections to rate the employee on customer service, completed work products, and operational efficiency. The supervisor provides narrative comments and examples to justify the ratings for each performance element.
This document contains a staff performance appraisal form used to evaluate employee performance. The form includes sections for employee identification information, rating factors to evaluate job knowledge, quality of work, productivity, dependability, attendance, relations with others, commitment to safety, and supervisory ability if applicable. Employees are rated in one of four categories: exceeds performance standards, achieves performance standards proficient, achieves performance standards marginal, or below performance standards. The form provides instructions for supervisors to complete the evaluation and identify if a performance improvement plan is needed.
This performance appraisal form contains sections for employees and their managers to evaluate performance over a given period. The employee lists key responsibilities and major accomplishments, which the manager then comments on and rates. The employee also notes any disappointments. The manager provides feedback on 16 performance criteria, such as reliability, initiative, and communication skills. Goals are set for the next review period. Once completed, both parties sign and date the evaluation.
This employee performance appraisal form reviews an employee's performance over a specified period. It contains 6 sections that evaluate the employee's responsibilities, core competencies, feedback from stakeholders, developmental goals, future goals, and comments. The goal of the review is to help the employee succeed in their career by improving performance and meeting expectations. Ratings are provided to assess performance in each area reviewed.
My Singer Self Appraisal by Mr Muraliy Prakash, EX - Sales DirectorElmo B. Joseph
Elmo Joseph has worked as the Operations Manager for the Sales department for one year. His performance objectives focused on streamlining operations and executing new projects. He exceeded expectations by taking on additional responsibilities positively and delivering excellent results. The appraiser notes Elmo was a source of strength, fulfilled tasks with perfection, made sound decisions, communicated well, and helped broaden the company's outlook. Overall, Elmo consistently meets the requirements of his position and his recruitment was timely as he contributed significantly to the retail channel.
Analysis of performance cum competency score card of executivesAjay S P
The document discusses the performance evaluation system of Neyveli Lignite Corporation Limited using a Key Performance Analysis (KPA) system and Performance Cum Competency Scorecard (PCCS). It describes the multi-level process where executives self-evaluate and submit their PCCS to reporting officers, who assign marks across functional, technical and behavioral competencies. These scores are then reviewed by multiple reviewing officers before final grading. The system aims to objectively evaluate performance, identify training needs, and determine bonuses and incentives in a transparent manner.
The document outlines a performance evaluation form for a recruiter position at Sony Pictures, including a STAR rating scale to evaluate the recruiter's performance on core competencies and goals. It describes who will be responsible for evaluating the recruiter (their direct supervisor) and obtaining input from other stakeholders, such as recently hired employees. The form is intended to guide an annual performance review discussion between the recruiter and their supervisor.
This document contains an annual performance appraisal form for staff. It includes sections for objectives and major responsibilities, performance standards and ratings, and competencies and organizational values. The form provides instructions for employees to complete their self-review and for supervisors to provide feedback, ratings, and an overall assessment. The goal is to evaluate performance over the year, provide constructive feedback, and identify strengths and areas for development.
Performance Appraisal: Understanding the Programlen352tasons313
A performance appraisal is really a review and discussion of an employee's performance of assigned duties and duties. The actual appraisal will be based upon results obtained by the employee in his/her work, not about the employee's character characteristics. The performance appraisal procedures skills and accomplishments with reasonable precision as well as uniformity. It provides a method to help identify areas regarding performance enhancement and also to help advertise professional growth. It will not, however , be considered the particular supervisor's only interaction tool.
This document contains a staff performance appraisal form used to evaluate employee performance. The form includes sections for employee identification information, rating factors to evaluate job knowledge, quality of work, productivity, dependability, attendance, relations with others, commitment to safety, and supervisory ability if applicable. Employees are rated in one of four categories: exceeds performance standards, achieves performance standards proficient, achieves performance standards marginal, or below performance standards. The form provides instructions for supervisors to complete the evaluation and identify if a performance improvement plan is needed.
This performance appraisal form contains sections for employees and their managers to evaluate performance over a given period. The employee lists key responsibilities and major accomplishments, which the manager then comments on and rates. The employee also notes any disappointments. The manager provides feedback on 16 performance criteria, such as reliability, initiative, and communication skills. Goals are set for the next review period. Once completed, both parties sign and date the evaluation.
This employee performance appraisal form reviews an employee's performance over a specified period. It contains 6 sections that evaluate the employee's responsibilities, core competencies, feedback from stakeholders, developmental goals, future goals, and comments. The goal of the review is to help the employee succeed in their career by improving performance and meeting expectations. Ratings are provided to assess performance in each area reviewed.
My Singer Self Appraisal by Mr Muraliy Prakash, EX - Sales DirectorElmo B. Joseph
Elmo Joseph has worked as the Operations Manager for the Sales department for one year. His performance objectives focused on streamlining operations and executing new projects. He exceeded expectations by taking on additional responsibilities positively and delivering excellent results. The appraiser notes Elmo was a source of strength, fulfilled tasks with perfection, made sound decisions, communicated well, and helped broaden the company's outlook. Overall, Elmo consistently meets the requirements of his position and his recruitment was timely as he contributed significantly to the retail channel.
Analysis of performance cum competency score card of executivesAjay S P
The document discusses the performance evaluation system of Neyveli Lignite Corporation Limited using a Key Performance Analysis (KPA) system and Performance Cum Competency Scorecard (PCCS). It describes the multi-level process where executives self-evaluate and submit their PCCS to reporting officers, who assign marks across functional, technical and behavioral competencies. These scores are then reviewed by multiple reviewing officers before final grading. The system aims to objectively evaluate performance, identify training needs, and determine bonuses and incentives in a transparent manner.
The document outlines a performance evaluation form for a recruiter position at Sony Pictures, including a STAR rating scale to evaluate the recruiter's performance on core competencies and goals. It describes who will be responsible for evaluating the recruiter (their direct supervisor) and obtaining input from other stakeholders, such as recently hired employees. The form is intended to guide an annual performance review discussion between the recruiter and their supervisor.
This document contains an annual performance appraisal form for staff. It includes sections for objectives and major responsibilities, performance standards and ratings, and competencies and organizational values. The form provides instructions for employees to complete their self-review and for supervisors to provide feedback, ratings, and an overall assessment. The goal is to evaluate performance over the year, provide constructive feedback, and identify strengths and areas for development.
Performance Appraisal: Understanding the Programlen352tasons313
A performance appraisal is really a review and discussion of an employee's performance of assigned duties and duties. The actual appraisal will be based upon results obtained by the employee in his/her work, not about the employee's character characteristics. The performance appraisal procedures skills and accomplishments with reasonable precision as well as uniformity. It provides a method to help identify areas regarding performance enhancement and also to help advertise professional growth. It will not, however , be considered the particular supervisor's only interaction tool.
Derek Folley received an overall performance rating of "Very Good" for his work as an Intermediate Clerk from June 2009 to May 2010. He consistently met or exceeded expectations in areas like productivity, quality of work, work habits, personal relations, adaptability, job knowledge, and communication skills. Examples provided showed he efficiently processed mail, assisted customers, learned new skills, and adapted well to changes. His supervisor found him to be a dependable, respectful employee.
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EMPLOYEE’S NAMEPOSITION FORMDR.docxsheronlewthwaite
Here is a one page, double spaced comparison of the State of Washington and Orange County appraisal forms/systems:
The State of Washington and Orange County utilize different performance appraisal forms and systems to evaluate their employees. The State of Washington form is more structured and quantitative, while the Orange County form allows for more narrative feedback.
The Washington form breaks performance down into specific "Core Competencies" that are each rated on a numeric scale from 1 to 4. It then calculates an overall competency rating by averaging the individual scores. Goals are also assigned numeric ratings of 0, 2, or 4 and averaged for a goal rating. The two ratings are then weighted and combined to calculate an overall performance rating.
In contrast
The document discusses the key concepts and objectives of establishing a Strategic Performance Management System (SPMS) within a government agency. The main points are:
1) The SPMS aims to align employee and office-level performance targets with the agency's strategic priorities and mandates.
2) As part of SPMS, both Office Performance Commitment and Review forms (OPCR) and Individual Performance Commitment and Review forms (IPCR) will be created to establish performance targets.
3) A performance monitoring process will also be implemented, including periodic reporting, reviews between supervisors and employees, and an annual performance evaluation.
Performance development plan pdp training oct 2010Khushvinder Kaur
This document provides guidance on completing performance development plans (PDPs) at The Evergreen State College. It explains that supervisors will learn how to set work expectations and evaluate employee performance using the PDP process, while employees will learn how to participate in setting goals. The PDP consists of two forms - the planning phase form which is completed at the start of the review period to set expectations and goals, and the assessment phase form which is used to evaluate performance at the end of the period. The document outlines how to fill out each section of the forms, including setting key results and skills expectations, identifying training goals, and providing feedback on performance and goal achievement.
This document outlines the DepEd's Results-Based Performance Management System form for senior officers. It contains four parts: I) accomplishments of key results areas and objectives, where employees set targets and are rated on achieving them; II) competencies that employees demonstrate; III) a summary of ratings to discuss; and IV) development plans to highlight strengths, needs, and training actions. The form is used to jointly plan targets, provide feedback, and develop employees in aligning individual performance with organizational goals.
This document outlines the instructions and process for conducting an annual employee performance review. It includes sections for evaluating an employee's performance on primary job responsibilities and factors like quality of work, initiative, and problem solving. Goals and objectives from the review period are also assessed. The review is signed by both the employee and supervisor and then submitted to Human Resources.
(1) This form provides a goal-setting and self-assessment process for associates to determine goals, assess progress, and evaluate performance. (2) Associates set strategic and developmental goals using the SMART method and submit them to their manager for review twice annually. (3) At year-end, associates assess their performance on goals and competencies using a 5-point rating scale and provide an overall self-rating.
The document discusses performance management systems (PMS). It defines key concepts like performance, performance appraisal, and the goals of a PMS. A PMS establishes objectives, monitors and evaluates performance, and facilitates employee development and recognition. It aims to align individual goals with organizational goals and develop employees' abilities to meet or exceed expectations. The document outlines the various components of a PMS and why measuring performance is important for improvement, management, and growth.
The document outlines an employee's yearly performance evaluation process. It evaluates an employee's performance over the past 12 months based on criteria selected by the company. The evaluation form is divided into several sections rating the employee on a scale of 1 to 5 in areas like safety, quality, and employee development. The supervisor documents strengths and areas for improvement before meeting with the employee to discuss the review. The employee can then provide comments and sign the completed form.
This document appears to be a performance evaluation report and instructions for a state system of higher education employee. It includes factors to evaluate an employee's performance such as quality of work, work habits, relationships, dependability, quantity of work, initiative, analytical ability, ability as a supervisor, administrative ability, and safety. It provides definitions for rating an employee's performance on each factor as unsatisfactory, fair, good, very good, or excellent. It also provides instructions on when and by whom employees should be evaluated, defining adjectival ratings, reviewing the report, and conducting a rating interview with the employee.
The document is a form used by the Department of Education of the Philippines (DepEd) for its results-based performance management system. It consists of four parts: Part I evaluates employees' accomplishments of key results areas and objectives; Part II evaluates competencies; Part III summarizes ratings for discussion; and Part IV identifies development plans. The form aims to link individual achievements to organizational goals, promote growth, and allow open discussion of expectations between employees and supervisors.
This document discusses performance appraisals, which systematically evaluate employee work behavior and potential. Performance appraisals serve several purposes, including compensation, promotion, training, feedback, and personal growth decisions. They provide benefits from both employer and employee perspectives - allowing companies to implement goals and motivate employees, while giving employees feedback to improve. The performance appraisal process involves establishing standards, measuring actual performance against those standards, discussing the appraisal, and taking corrective action if needed.
This document discusses human resource management and performance appraisal management. It provides an overview of a library project submitted by a student on performance appraisal management. The objective of the project is to study the difference between performance appraisal and performance management, and the steps involved in the performance management process. The project is divided into chapters covering topics like job descriptions, performance standards, observation and feedback, performance appraisal, and a case study of a performance management system. It provides details on developing performance standards, giving behavioral feedback, and different methods of performance appraisal.
Final Assignment
Final Assignment
3
Company Address?
Date?
Inside Address?
Salutation?
Phoenix Advertising is a company established in North Carolina. According to the information given, it is evident that your branch is facing a number of challenges, which need to be attended to with immediate effect. Recently, two top management employees have left the company to join a competing firm; others are also threatening to leave the company.
Background
From the reports evaluated, there are factors that are leading to reassignment of the employees to rival companies. From the case scenario presented, it is evident that the top management fails to involve the junior employees as make most of the important decisions without consulting them. When the employees feel left out, they hardly perform, as they feel ignored most of the time. Secondly, the company focuses on increasing their levels of profitability. Hence, it is taking a lot of work from all potential clients without necessarily evaluating the accounts and the workload. This causes the employees responsible for working for ling hours with minimal compensation. In my opinion, this could be the reason for low morale and decrease in production.
Firstly, there is weak leadership, which fails to involve employees at all levels in the company. This can be seen from the way the management take lots work from all different clients without necessarily evaluating the accounts and workload. Secondly, there is poor communication between all levels. The top management does communicate with junior employees, and it fails to encourage their work and efforts. This is the reason they end up editing their work without consulting them. Further, the company is contracting more clients than it can handle with the current personnel.
The top management of the company should embrace real leadership and administration. To be precise, the management should and must effectively communicate with employees on all their levels. This could be achieved best by outlining their roles and responsibilities. It should also provide better means of evaluation and reporting of every employee. The heads of various departments should also work closely with their employees at make any changes in their works with their consultations in order to value their efforts at different levels (Schein, 1985).
Further, due to the increased volumes of workload, the management should also offer enough compensation to all employees by paying them for any overtime work from them. This could be achieved by improving the terms of the contract. Additionally, the company should provide an excellent working environment where the employees are comfortable. The management should also aim at improving human capital through ore training and development. This is because in the world of advertising, technology is changing the dynamics day by day. A specific timeline should be set in order to e ...
The document is a form used by the Department of Education (DepEd) in the Philippines for their Results-Based Performance Management System for teachers. The form is divided into four parts: Part I focuses on accomplishments of key result areas and objectives; Part II evaluates competencies; Part III provides a summary of ratings; and Part IV identifies development plans. The form rates teachers on factors such as effectiveness, efficiency, and timeliness in delivering agreed upon goals. It also rates teachers on competencies including self-management, professionalism, result focus, teamwork, service orientation, and innovation. The form is used to set goals, track performance, provide feedback, and identify strengths and areas for development.
At first hundred wagons of thanks to the writers of HR articles, books, journal and other essays, from those I have learnt so many essential diversified information.
Thanks to Google, Wordpress, Facebook, Slideshare and other free sites for facilitating us to share and learn knowledge.
I acknowledge the gratefulness and usefulness of all the words I used by learning in any knowledge source.
HR recruitment is always one of the most important tasks for a knowledge- work based organization. The crucial part of this process is to identify the right person for the right position through proper assessment of real time competencies & weaknesses, and to plan the effort required for the employee so that the future expectation to the recruited employee or step by step succession planning may be logically derived.
I have developed a recruitment process that is attached herewith.
Anyone on this planet may use this process in any form, in own understanding and responsibilities. Any one may correct errors in definitions or improve in process or related document list. The document has been shared with a mind set to help those who need it.
Like is not desired, suggest if any improvement is required and get benefit by using it. I believe it may be very much helpful to develop a computerized system, extending this document into a DFD document.
STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM (Teaching).docxssuser1028f8
This document is a staff performance appraisal form used to evaluate teaching staff at Soroti University. It consists of several sections for documenting an employee's personal details, self-assessment of performance against targets, assessment of core competencies, identification of performance gaps, and an action plan. The process allows for agreement between the employee and supervisor on outputs and goals for the review period, and facilitates an ongoing dialogue to provide feedback and identify training needs to improve performance.
The performance feedback form is designed to support employee growth and development. It includes ratings for critical job tasks, identification of strengths and areas for growth with examples and competencies, and goals. The manager collects feedback from their experiences and team members to evaluate the employee's performance semiannually using this form. Both the manager and employee provide ratings which are discussed, with the manager's rating as the final decision. However, employees can appeal ratings to HR. The process aims to have open communication and determine if employees are developing and should be retained. The form was evaluated positively overall for supporting development and communication between managers and employees.
Derek Folley received an overall performance rating of "Very Good" for his work as an Intermediate Clerk from June 2009 to May 2010. He consistently met or exceeded expectations in areas like productivity, quality of work, work habits, personal relations, adaptability, job knowledge, and communication skills. Examples provided showed he efficiently processed mail, assisted customers, learned new skills, and adapted well to changes. His supervisor found him to be a dependable, respectful employee.
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION EMPLOYEE’S NAMEPOSITION FORMDR.docxsheronlewthwaite
Here is a one page, double spaced comparison of the State of Washington and Orange County appraisal forms/systems:
The State of Washington and Orange County utilize different performance appraisal forms and systems to evaluate their employees. The State of Washington form is more structured and quantitative, while the Orange County form allows for more narrative feedback.
The Washington form breaks performance down into specific "Core Competencies" that are each rated on a numeric scale from 1 to 4. It then calculates an overall competency rating by averaging the individual scores. Goals are also assigned numeric ratings of 0, 2, or 4 and averaged for a goal rating. The two ratings are then weighted and combined to calculate an overall performance rating.
In contrast
The document discusses the key concepts and objectives of establishing a Strategic Performance Management System (SPMS) within a government agency. The main points are:
1) The SPMS aims to align employee and office-level performance targets with the agency's strategic priorities and mandates.
2) As part of SPMS, both Office Performance Commitment and Review forms (OPCR) and Individual Performance Commitment and Review forms (IPCR) will be created to establish performance targets.
3) A performance monitoring process will also be implemented, including periodic reporting, reviews between supervisors and employees, and an annual performance evaluation.
Performance development plan pdp training oct 2010Khushvinder Kaur
This document provides guidance on completing performance development plans (PDPs) at The Evergreen State College. It explains that supervisors will learn how to set work expectations and evaluate employee performance using the PDP process, while employees will learn how to participate in setting goals. The PDP consists of two forms - the planning phase form which is completed at the start of the review period to set expectations and goals, and the assessment phase form which is used to evaluate performance at the end of the period. The document outlines how to fill out each section of the forms, including setting key results and skills expectations, identifying training goals, and providing feedback on performance and goal achievement.
This document outlines the DepEd's Results-Based Performance Management System form for senior officers. It contains four parts: I) accomplishments of key results areas and objectives, where employees set targets and are rated on achieving them; II) competencies that employees demonstrate; III) a summary of ratings to discuss; and IV) development plans to highlight strengths, needs, and training actions. The form is used to jointly plan targets, provide feedback, and develop employees in aligning individual performance with organizational goals.
This document outlines the instructions and process for conducting an annual employee performance review. It includes sections for evaluating an employee's performance on primary job responsibilities and factors like quality of work, initiative, and problem solving. Goals and objectives from the review period are also assessed. The review is signed by both the employee and supervisor and then submitted to Human Resources.
(1) This form provides a goal-setting and self-assessment process for associates to determine goals, assess progress, and evaluate performance. (2) Associates set strategic and developmental goals using the SMART method and submit them to their manager for review twice annually. (3) At year-end, associates assess their performance on goals and competencies using a 5-point rating scale and provide an overall self-rating.
The document discusses performance management systems (PMS). It defines key concepts like performance, performance appraisal, and the goals of a PMS. A PMS establishes objectives, monitors and evaluates performance, and facilitates employee development and recognition. It aims to align individual goals with organizational goals and develop employees' abilities to meet or exceed expectations. The document outlines the various components of a PMS and why measuring performance is important for improvement, management, and growth.
The document outlines an employee's yearly performance evaluation process. It evaluates an employee's performance over the past 12 months based on criteria selected by the company. The evaluation form is divided into several sections rating the employee on a scale of 1 to 5 in areas like safety, quality, and employee development. The supervisor documents strengths and areas for improvement before meeting with the employee to discuss the review. The employee can then provide comments and sign the completed form.
This document appears to be a performance evaluation report and instructions for a state system of higher education employee. It includes factors to evaluate an employee's performance such as quality of work, work habits, relationships, dependability, quantity of work, initiative, analytical ability, ability as a supervisor, administrative ability, and safety. It provides definitions for rating an employee's performance on each factor as unsatisfactory, fair, good, very good, or excellent. It also provides instructions on when and by whom employees should be evaluated, defining adjectival ratings, reviewing the report, and conducting a rating interview with the employee.
The document is a form used by the Department of Education of the Philippines (DepEd) for its results-based performance management system. It consists of four parts: Part I evaluates employees' accomplishments of key results areas and objectives; Part II evaluates competencies; Part III summarizes ratings for discussion; and Part IV identifies development plans. The form aims to link individual achievements to organizational goals, promote growth, and allow open discussion of expectations between employees and supervisors.
This document discusses performance appraisals, which systematically evaluate employee work behavior and potential. Performance appraisals serve several purposes, including compensation, promotion, training, feedback, and personal growth decisions. They provide benefits from both employer and employee perspectives - allowing companies to implement goals and motivate employees, while giving employees feedback to improve. The performance appraisal process involves establishing standards, measuring actual performance against those standards, discussing the appraisal, and taking corrective action if needed.
This document discusses human resource management and performance appraisal management. It provides an overview of a library project submitted by a student on performance appraisal management. The objective of the project is to study the difference between performance appraisal and performance management, and the steps involved in the performance management process. The project is divided into chapters covering topics like job descriptions, performance standards, observation and feedback, performance appraisal, and a case study of a performance management system. It provides details on developing performance standards, giving behavioral feedback, and different methods of performance appraisal.
Final Assignment
Final Assignment
3
Company Address?
Date?
Inside Address?
Salutation?
Phoenix Advertising is a company established in North Carolina. According to the information given, it is evident that your branch is facing a number of challenges, which need to be attended to with immediate effect. Recently, two top management employees have left the company to join a competing firm; others are also threatening to leave the company.
Background
From the reports evaluated, there are factors that are leading to reassignment of the employees to rival companies. From the case scenario presented, it is evident that the top management fails to involve the junior employees as make most of the important decisions without consulting them. When the employees feel left out, they hardly perform, as they feel ignored most of the time. Secondly, the company focuses on increasing their levels of profitability. Hence, it is taking a lot of work from all potential clients without necessarily evaluating the accounts and the workload. This causes the employees responsible for working for ling hours with minimal compensation. In my opinion, this could be the reason for low morale and decrease in production.
Firstly, there is weak leadership, which fails to involve employees at all levels in the company. This can be seen from the way the management take lots work from all different clients without necessarily evaluating the accounts and workload. Secondly, there is poor communication between all levels. The top management does communicate with junior employees, and it fails to encourage their work and efforts. This is the reason they end up editing their work without consulting them. Further, the company is contracting more clients than it can handle with the current personnel.
The top management of the company should embrace real leadership and administration. To be precise, the management should and must effectively communicate with employees on all their levels. This could be achieved best by outlining their roles and responsibilities. It should also provide better means of evaluation and reporting of every employee. The heads of various departments should also work closely with their employees at make any changes in their works with their consultations in order to value their efforts at different levels (Schein, 1985).
Further, due to the increased volumes of workload, the management should also offer enough compensation to all employees by paying them for any overtime work from them. This could be achieved by improving the terms of the contract. Additionally, the company should provide an excellent working environment where the employees are comfortable. The management should also aim at improving human capital through ore training and development. This is because in the world of advertising, technology is changing the dynamics day by day. A specific timeline should be set in order to e ...
The document is a form used by the Department of Education (DepEd) in the Philippines for their Results-Based Performance Management System for teachers. The form is divided into four parts: Part I focuses on accomplishments of key result areas and objectives; Part II evaluates competencies; Part III provides a summary of ratings; and Part IV identifies development plans. The form rates teachers on factors such as effectiveness, efficiency, and timeliness in delivering agreed upon goals. It also rates teachers on competencies including self-management, professionalism, result focus, teamwork, service orientation, and innovation. The form is used to set goals, track performance, provide feedback, and identify strengths and areas for development.
At first hundred wagons of thanks to the writers of HR articles, books, journal and other essays, from those I have learnt so many essential diversified information.
Thanks to Google, Wordpress, Facebook, Slideshare and other free sites for facilitating us to share and learn knowledge.
I acknowledge the gratefulness and usefulness of all the words I used by learning in any knowledge source.
HR recruitment is always one of the most important tasks for a knowledge- work based organization. The crucial part of this process is to identify the right person for the right position through proper assessment of real time competencies & weaknesses, and to plan the effort required for the employee so that the future expectation to the recruited employee or step by step succession planning may be logically derived.
I have developed a recruitment process that is attached herewith.
Anyone on this planet may use this process in any form, in own understanding and responsibilities. Any one may correct errors in definitions or improve in process or related document list. The document has been shared with a mind set to help those who need it.
Like is not desired, suggest if any improvement is required and get benefit by using it. I believe it may be very much helpful to develop a computerized system, extending this document into a DFD document.
STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM (Teaching).docxssuser1028f8
This document is a staff performance appraisal form used to evaluate teaching staff at Soroti University. It consists of several sections for documenting an employee's personal details, self-assessment of performance against targets, assessment of core competencies, identification of performance gaps, and an action plan. The process allows for agreement between the employee and supervisor on outputs and goals for the review period, and facilitates an ongoing dialogue to provide feedback and identify training needs to improve performance.
The performance feedback form is designed to support employee growth and development. It includes ratings for critical job tasks, identification of strengths and areas for growth with examples and competencies, and goals. The manager collects feedback from their experiences and team members to evaluate the employee's performance semiannually using this form. Both the manager and employee provide ratings which are discussed, with the manager's rating as the final decision. However, employees can appeal ratings to HR. The process aims to have open communication and determine if employees are developing and should be retained. The form was evaluated positively overall for supporting development and communication between managers and employees.
1. U. S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Page 1
Non-supervisory Employee Performance Appraisal Recordj
This form records: (1) an understanding between the rating official and the employee of what is to be
accomplished during the appraisal period; (2) how those accomplishments will be evaluated; (3) theemployee’s interim progress toward achieving the specified accomplishments; (4) the employee’s acutal
accomplishments during the rating period; and (5) the overall summary rating assigned to the employee.
Performance Rating Period: From: 11/09/2014 To: 09/30/2015
TYPE OF RATiNG (Indicate the type ofrating.)
0 ANNUAL RATING OF RECORD 0 INTERiM RATiNG 0 OTHER
Name: Shirley Bethea Social Security Number:
Position Title: Administrative Assistant Series & Grade: GS-303-09
Office/Location: Office of Information Technology
Performance Plan Certification: Signatures certify that the rating official and the employee have met, reviewed andldiscussed the Primary Elements and Performance Standardsfor the established performance appraisal period. The
performance plan is contained in Part IV
( PieffeUe Mclntfre
Rating ffic/dV Si ture Date Rating Official’s Name (typed orprinted)
2jLt Shirley Bethea
Employee’s Si ture Date Employee’s Name (typed orprinted)
Progress Review Certification: Initials by rating official and employee certz)5i that performance and progress to
date have been discussed. Written documentation is contained in Part III - A (Rating Official’s comments) and B
(Employee optional comments).
Rating Official: /JLL_
Date:”/
Employee:
_____
___
_____
_____
Privacy Act Statement
This form is subject to the provisions of the Privacy Act. Copies will be retained by the Office of Human Resources, and provided for reviewand retention as required to appropriate management officials having a need to know. The Non-supervisory Performance Appraisal Recordgathers and records information on how EEOC employees are performing their duties and responsibilities. The information will be used todetermine eligibility for, retention in, or removal from EEOC; awards, and/or compensation benefits. The authority to collect this information iscontained in Title IV of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978. The information will not be disclosed outside of EEOC without prior consentexcept as required or permitted by law.
EEOC FORM 636 (JUNE 2005)
2. PART II PERFORMANCE RATIN( GUIDELINE Page 2
IJThELINES
Performance Rating Guidelines. Each element described in the employee’s performance plan is critical to the
accomplishment of the agency’s mission and goals and is therefore, designated as a Primary Element. The objective of
the first Primary Element, Customer Service/Communications, is to assess the quality and timeliness of the employee’s
contacts/interactions, written/oral communications, guidance and/or advice to/with internal/external customers/
stakeholders. The objective ofthe second Primary Element, Completed Work Products, is to assess the specific work
products/services completed. The objective ofthe third Primary Element, Operational Efficiency and Effectiveness, is
to assess employee’s overall contribution to/impact on the organizational goals and objectives ofthe agency. The
performance standard definitions serve as guidelines for determining the employee’s performance under each element.
For each Primary Element, the rater must carefully determine whether the employee’s performance aligns with the
expectations outlined in the four rating levels. The overall contribution ofthe employee’s performance for each
Primary Element must, in the rater’s judgment, meet the rating level assigned.
Performance S dard Definitions
OUTSTANDING (Far Exceeds Expectation): The employee’s performance consistently exceeds the highly effective
level and greatly exceeds the expectations described in the Fully Successful standard. This is the level of exceptional
performance. The Primary Element is not only achieved, but completed in an exemplary manner. The employee
makes exceptional contributions to the organizational goals and objectives of the agency.
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE (Exceeds Expectations): The employee’s performance consistently exceeds expectations
described in the fully successful standard. This is the level of unusually good performance. Performance of the
Primary Element is consistently above the fully successful level. The employee makes significant contributions to the
organizational goals and objectives ofthe agency.
FULLY SUCCESSFUL Øfeets Expectations): The employee’s performance consistently meets expectations
described in the fully successful standard in the employee’s performance plan. This is the level of good sound
performance. The Primary Elements are met. The employee has contributed positively to organizational goals and
achieved meaningful results.
UNACCEPTABLE (Fails to Meet Expectations): The employee’s performance is unacceptable and fails to meet the
established performance standard i.e., Fully Successful, in one or more Primary Elements. Job performance produces
unacceptable work products. Minimum requirements ofone or more Primary Elements are not met. Performance
deficiencies detract from mission goals and objectives.
3. PART ffl-A PROGRESS REVIEW - RATING OFFICIAL’S COMMENTS Page 3
One progress review is required at midpoint of the performance cycle; however, frequent communication between the
employee and rating official regarding performance is encouraged and recommended. The rating official will assess
and document in writing the progress made by the employee in achieving results and meeting performance
expectations. Specific comments should be provided on areas accomplished well by the employee, if the employee is
progressing as planned, or in need of improvement. Note: A progress review is I a rating. The employee’s written
comments are optional but encouraged. Written documentation becomes part ofthe performance appraisal and a copy
is provided to the employee. The rating official and employee must then date and initial in the space provided in Part
I, certifying that performance and progress to date have been discussed. (Limited to 37 lines of text)
VbW’ titd Vt*&11
4. PART UlE PROGRESS REVIEW - EMPLOYEE’S COMMENTS (OPTIONAL) Page 4
One progress review is required at midpoint ofthe performance cycle; however, frequent communication between the
employee and rating official regarding performance is encouraged and recommended. The rating official will assess
and document in writing the progress made by the employee in achieving results and meeting performance
expectations. Specific comments should be provided on areas accomplished well by the employee, if the employee is
progressing as planned, or in need of improvement. Note: A progress review is a rating. The employee’s written
comments are optional but encouraged. Written documentation becomes part of the performance appraisal and a copy
is provided to the employee. The rating official and employee must then date and initial in the space provided in Part
I, certifying that performance and progress to date have been discussed. (Limited to 37 lines of text)
5. PART IV: INDIVIDUAL ELEMENTRATTNG AND NARRATIVESJJMMARY’ Page 5
Name: Shirley Bethea
Position Title: Administrative Assistant Series & Grade: GS-303-09
Rating Period: From: 11/09/2014 To: 09/30/20 15
INSTRUCTIONS: The rating official shall assess the employee’s performance on each Primary Element,
taking into consideration all relevant performance information including the Accomplishment Report
submitted by the employee and any interim ratings completed during the appraisal period and (1) indicate
in the space below whether the employee’s performance Far Exceeds Expectations (FE), Exceeds
Expectations (E), Meets Expectations (M), or Fails to Meet Expectations (F) for the element and (2) give
concise but substantive examples of results achieved that support the rating for each Primary Element.
PRIMARY ELEMENT I of HI: Customer Service and Communication
Level of Achievement: 0 FE 0 E 0 F
NARRATIVE SUMMARY
(Give concise but substantive explanation and examples to support element rating): (Limited to 27 lines of text)
6. PART IV INDIVIDUAL PRIMARY ELEMENT RATING AND NARRATIVE SUMMARY Page 6
Name: Shirley Bethea
Position Title: Administrative Assistant Series & Grade: GS-303-09
Rating Period: From: 11/09/2014 To: 09/30/2015
INSTRUCTIONS: The rating official shall assess the employee’s performance on each Primary Element,
taking into consideration all relevant performance information including the Accomplishment Report
submitted by the employee and any interim ratings completed during the appraisal period and (1) indicate
in the space below whether the employee’s performance Far Exceeds Expectations (FE), Exceeds
Expectations (E), Meets Expectations (M), or Fails to Meet Expectations (F) for the element and (2) give
concise but substantive examples of results achieved that support the rating for each Primary Element.
PRIMARY ELEMENT Ii of III: Completed Work Product
Level of Achievement: 0 FE 0 £ F
NARRATIVE SUMMARY
(Give concise but substantive explanation and examples to support element rating): (Limited to 27 lines of text)
7. PART IV INDIVIDUAL PRIMARY ELEMENT RATING AND NARRATIVE SUMMARY Page 7
Name: Shirley Bethea
Position Title: Administrative Assistant Series & Grade: GS-303-09
Rating Period: From: 11/09/2014 To: 09/30/2015
INSTRUCTIONS: The rating official shall assess the employee’s performance on each Primary Element,
taking into consideration all relevant performance information including the Accomplishment Report
submitted by the employee and any interim ratings completed during the appraisal period and (1) indicate
in the space below whether the employee’s performance Far Exceeds Expectations (FE), Exceeds
Expectations (E), Meets Expectations (M), or Fails to Meet Expectations (F) for the element and (2) give
concise but substantive examples of results achieved that support the rating for each Primary Element.
PRIMARY ELEMENT Ill of ill: Operational Efficiency and Effectiveness
Level of Achievement: Q FE 0 M 0 F
NARRATIVE SUMMARY
(Give concise but substantive explanation and examples to support element rating): (Limited to 27 lines of text)
8. PARTY: STThY RATING
Name: Shirley Bethea
Page 8
Position Title: Administrative Assistant Series & Grade: GS-303-09
Rating Period: From: 11/09/2014 To: 09/30/2015
INSTRUCTIONS: Based on the element ratings given in Part IV on the individual Primary Elements, select
one of the four levels of performance that best describes the employee’s overall performance:
Q OUTSTANDiNG The majority of the individual Primary Elements must be rated Far Exceeds
Expectations and must include a Far Exceeds Expectations rating for the Primary
Element, Completed Work Products. No Primary Element may be rated below
Exceeds Expectations.
O HIGHLY EFFECTIVE The majority of the individual Primary Elements are rated higher than Meets
Expectations. No Primary Element is rated below Meets Expectations.
® FULLY SUCCESSFUL All individual Primary Elements are rated Meets Expectations or higher.
majority of the Primary Elements are not rated above Meets Expectations.
Q UNSATISFACTORY One or more individual Primary Elements are rated Failed to Meet Expectations.
The
Ratin Official’s Signature
Reviewing Official’s Signature
Date £ (
Date
Pierrette Meintire
Rating Official’s Name (typed or printed)
N/A
Reviewing Official’s Name (typed or printed)
The employee’s signature means only that the employee has had an opportunity to review, discuss, and comment on this
praisal.
Shirley Bethea
Employee’s Signature Date Employee’s Name (typed or printed)
Employee Comments? QYes QNo (Limited to 7 lines of text)
9. Page 9
PART Irk PERFORMANCE PLANNING
Position Title: Technical Specialist
Primary Element I: Customer Service and Communications
.
Fully Successful StandardGeneral Measures Specific Measures
(meets expectations)
Tells what is important Describes those parts of Describes the level ofgoodsoundperformance,
about the Element, e.g., the results that are tracked commensurate with the employee ‘s grade level. Each
Quality, Cost, e.g., Accuracy ofData. ofthefollowing aspects ofwork must have been usually
Timeliness, Efficiency, accomplished.
Effectiveness.
Quality Effective oral/written Communications with internal/external stakeholders are
communications clear, effective, and consistent with established
agency/office guidelines.
Accuracy of information Hardware and software inventory issues or problems are
identified and adequately resolved.
Analysis is useful and answers the questions asked.
Technical support provided achieves appropriate/desired
results.
Timeliness Adherence to time frames Assignments are completed and presented in accordance
with established deadlines and time frames with employee
input, as appropriate.
Response time Response to customer inquiries/requests is timely,
responsive and accurate.
Feedback Sources for Monitoring Sourcesfor this Primary Element may include, but are not limited to, thefollowing:
Supervisor’s review of work products
Supervisor’s observation
Employee input
Feedback internal/external stakeholders
10. Page 10
Part VI PERFORMANCE PLANNING
Position Title: Technical Specialist
Primary Element II: Completed Work Products
. Fully Successful StandardGeneral Measures Specific Measures
(meets expectations)
Tells what is important Describes those parts of Describes the level ofgood soundperformance,
about the Element, e.g., the results that are tracked commensurate with the employee ‘s grade level. Each
Quality, Cost, e.g., Accuracy ofData. ofthefollowing aspects ofwork must have been usually
Timeliness, Efficiency, accomplished.
Effectiveness.
Quality Clarity, accuracy, and logical Relevant and quality information and services (e.g., analysis
organization of work of inventory data, guidelines, etc.) are
products developed/delivered/produced in accordance with EEOC
policies, procedures, regulations and guidelines.
Major revisions are rarely necessary; most work products
require only minor revisions.
Thoroughness and accuracy Written materials are accurate, clear, logical, well organized
of analysis, research and and understandable, and delivered/produced within
information established agency/office guidelines.
Technical support provided is relevant, comprehensive, and
adequately addresses all issues.
Recommendations, proposed solutions, and modifications
are sound and designed to achieve division objectives.
Design and implementation of new information technology
effectively meets agency needs.
Alternative courses of action are identified and based on
logical assumptions and factual information that take into
consideration resources, constraints, and organizational
needs.
Timeliness Adherence to established Assignments are completed and presented in accordance
deadlines and time frames with established deadlines and time frames. Time frames
may be adjusted to consider such factors as workload, travel
requirements, etc.
Feedback Sources for Monitoring Sourcesfor this Primaiy Element may include, but are not limited to. thefollowing:
Supervisor’s review of work products
Supervisor’s observation
Employee input
Tracking systems
11. Page 11
Part VI: PERFORMANCE PLANNING
Position Title: Technical Specialist
Primary Element III: Operational Efficiency and Effectiveness
.
Fully Successful StandardGeneral Measures Specific Measures
(meets expectations)
Tells what’s important Describes which part of Describes the level ofgoodsoundperformance,
about the Element, e.g., the results to be tracked commensurate with the employee ‘s grade level. Each
Quality, Cost, e.g., Accuracy ofData. ofthefollowing aspects ofwork must have been
Timeliness, Efficiency, usually accomplished.
Effectiveness.
Efficiency and Contributes to agency/office Work is planned, managed and performed to advance the
Effectiveness goals by planning, accomplishment ofthe agency/office’s goals.
prioritizing and completing
work
Effective internal/external Collaboration with office staff is productive and supports
collaboration agency/office goals.
Feedback Sources for Monitoring Sourcesfor this Primary Element may include, but are not limited to, thefollowing:
Supervisor’s review of work products
Supervisor’s observation
Employee input
Analysis of employee’s overall contribution to the agency/office goals during the appraisal period
12. Office of Information Technology (OIT)
2015 Attachment A - Work Protocols and Expectations — Shirley Bethea
Team Work
• Be inclusive and actively collaborate with others.
• Take initiative regarding your team’s assignments and responsibilities. Show a sense of urgency.
• Continuously monitor the tickets for your groups and assign unassigned tickets to yourself.
• If you see an unassigned ticket for your team, and you cannot resolve the issue yourself, find someone else to
accept it.
• Attend your assigned meetings promptly; and participate actively.
• Come to meetings prepared with current status details on your projects, tasks, and work.
Engagement
• Th retain telework privilege, adhere to the requirements set forth in OlT’s Telework MOU and Telework
Agreement.
• Be available to respond to communications via phone, messenger, and/or email. You must be able to
participate in audio conference calls, web-based collaboration sessions and automated time and attendance
system.
• When teleworking send an e-mail to your supervisor no later than lOAM, listing the substantive work you plan
to complete while teleworking. No need to list all administrative tasks, such as checking/responding to
emails.
• If required, provide any requested deliverable produced during your work day to your supervisor no later than
close of business that same day.
FY2015 Work Products:
• Train to ensure full understanding of requirements for entry of financial transactions, credit card processing,
and asset management utilizing the new Financial System. Work with Administrative Team lead to identify
process improvements for efficiently using the new system.
• Ensure IT inventory is accurately and timely updated in the asset management system.
• Ensure Asset management and excessing of property is coordinated with minimal management guidance.
• Assume lead responsibility for entry of financial management (Purchase Request approvals, credit card
processing, reconciliation, monitoring invoice & payments) into the financial system. Complete financial
transactions in an accurate and timely manner, maintaining paper and electronic documents as required.
• Assume responsibility for entry of human resource (SF52s, etc) into the Federal Personnel and Payroll System,
completing transactions in an accurate and timely manner.
• Complete payroll time-keeping responsibilities within Quicktime in an accurate and timely manner, assisting
staff and management as required and reviewing timecards for errors prior to validation.
• Become skilled in the travel system, to support staff and management. Learn travel regulations related to
reimbursement.
• Monitor and resolve Service Now tickets, including maintaining software inventory spreadsheets, in a timely,
consistent and satisfactory manner.
• Assist with updating and following EEOC/OIT processes and procedures with minimal management oversight.
• Ensure timely completion of Inventory certifications and audits without major problems.
• Report on projects and escalation of problems/issues in a clear, effective, and timely manner.
• Serve as administrative assistant to the ClO and DCIO, managing schedule, correspondence and other special
assignments in an accurate and efficient manner. Monitor and control workflow/communications for OlT.
2
13. .ta,,dard Form 50
1ev, 7191
IS. OfflceofPenoond Management NOTIFICATION OF PERSONNEL ACTION
PM Supp. 296—33, Suheh. 4
I. Name (I.,ast, First, MIddle) 2. SocIal Security Number 3. Date of BIrth 4. EffectIve Date
SETHEA, ShIRLEY 579464310 02/02/1961 11/1612014
FIRST ACTION SECOND ACTION
5—A. Code 5-B. Nature of Action 6-A. Code 6-B. Nature of Action
702 PROMOTION
5-C, Code 5—D. Legal Authority 6-C. Code 6—D. Legal Authority
N3M REG. 335.102 COMP
5-C. Code 5-F. Legal Authority 6-C. Code 6-F. Legal Authority
7. FROM: Position Title and Number 15. TO: Poollion Title and Number
SUPPLY TECHNICIAN ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
IT H008040 rr 11008153
. Pay Plan 9. 0cc. Code 0. Grade or Level Ii. Step or Rat. 12. Total Salary 13. Pay BasIs 16. Pay Plan 17. 0cc. Coda iS. Grade or Level 19.Step or Rate 20. Total Salary/Award 21. Pay Bails
GS 2005 08 10 61377 PA GS 0301 09 09 66049 PA
2*. hate Pay 12B. Locality Adj. tIC. *43. BasIc Pay 12D. Other Fey 20*. BasIc Pay 20B. Locality Adj. bC. *63. BasIc Pay 200. Other Pay
49410 11967 61377 0 53171 12878 66049 0
14. Name and Location of Position’s OrganIzation 22, Name and Location of Poaltloa’s Organization
EQUAL EMPL OPPOR COMM EQUAL EMPL OPPOR COMM
)FF OF INFO TECHNOLOGY, OFF OF DIR OFF OF INFO TECHNOLOGY, OF? OF DIR
WASH]NGTON,DC WASIHNGTON,DC
EMPLOYEE DATA
13. Veterans Preference 14. Tenure 25. Agency Usc 26. Veterans Preference for RIP
T :, s5.bIe tO-PslstJCampcaaabief3S% I YES NO
17. FEGLI 28. Annultant Indicator 29. Pay Rate Determinant
BASIC ONLY 9 NOT APPLICABLE 0
30. Retirement Plan 31. ServIce Comp. Date (Leave) 32, Work Schedule 33. Part—Time Hours Per
I]FERS & FICA 01/0811985 F jFULL-TIME
POSiTION DATA
34. PosItion OccupIed 35, FLSA Category 36. Appropriation Cede 37. BargainIng Unit Status
fl I - Competithe Serolec 3 -SIS Ceseral L-tseI
4-Sn CarcerReacroed N Noaeo,.ops 8888
38. Duty Station Cede 39. Duty Station (City — County — State or Overaeu Locatioa)
11-0010-001 WASHINGTON,DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
40. Agency Data 41. 42. 43. 44.
FUNC CLS 00 VET STAT X EDUC LVL 04 SUPV STATS POSITION SENSITIViTY NONSENSITWE/LOW RI
t FROM MERIT PROMOTION CERT. #GK-14-JGI-03149S01 DATED 09/30/14.
POSITION IS AT THE FULL PERFORMANCE LEVEL OR BAND.
16. EmployIng Department or Agency 50. SignatorelAuthenticatlon and Title of Approving omclni
EE - EQUAL EMPL OPPOR COMM 142012990 / ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED BY:
17. Agency Code 48. Personnel Office ID 49. Approval Date TERESA DARGAN
EEOO 3201 11/24/2014 HUMAN RESOURCES SPECIALIST
-Part 50—316
2- OPF Copy - Long-Term Record - DO NOT DESTROY Editiem Prior to 7/91 *re Not DiaNe Alter 6/3019
NSN 7S4O-0l-333-42