Lutfor Ali v assam.pdf
•
0 likes•139 views
The document is a court order from the Gauhati High Court regarding an application for anticipatory bail filed by four applicants (Lutfor Ali, Rakmat Mollah, Jorina Khatun, and Ikbal Hussain Sikdar) who were apprehending arrest in connection with a case registered under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act. The court heard from the counsels for the applicants and the state. Considering the facts and circumstances, the court granted interim anticipatory bail to the applicants, allowing them to be released on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000 each with a local surety of the same amount, but requiring them to appear before the investigating officer within two weeks
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
ashad ali v assam.pdf
1) Ashad Ali, Md. Bidya Hussain, and Sahabuddin Munsi have applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case registered under sections 363/366/376(2)(n) of the IPC and sections 6 of the POCSO Act and 9 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act.
2) The judge heard from the applicants' counsel and the Additional Public Prosecutor representing the state.
3) The judge examined the FIR and documents. Considering the facts and circumstances, the judge granted interim anticipatory bail to the applicants subject to furnishing a bond and surety, and appearing before the investigating officer within 2 weeks to record their statements. The
Delhi court jan 4 bail order (1)
Three separate bail applications were filed on behalf of Osama, Gulfam @ Sonu Chikna, and Aatir who were accused of rioting, looting goods worth Rs. 2 lacs, and burning reharis in a godown. The court noted the careless and perfunctory nature of the investigation and charge sheet, which did not include witness statements. Considering the period of custody and inadequate investigation, the court granted bail to all three accused, subject to conditions that they not leave Delhi jurisdiction, engage in criminal activity, or contact witnesses.
Wpc 40473 /2017 - Non acceptance of Basic tax in Kerala Uploaded by James Jos...
Wpc 40473 /2017 - Non acceptance of Basic tax in Kerala Uploaded by James Jos...Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
Wpc 40473 /2017 - Non acceptance of Basic tax in Kerala Uploaded by James Joseph Adhikarathil 9447464502
it is ordered in the interest of justice that in
case the subject properties obtained by the petitioner pursuant to Exts.P1 and P2 registered sale deeds have already been mutated in favour of the petitioner and the land tax has already been accepted from him as per Ext.P3, then certainly he is the registered
landholder of the subject properties as envisaged in Section 3(3)(d) of the Kerala Land Tax Act,1961, in which case going by the cumulative impact mandate of Section 5 (2) r/w Section 3(3)(d) of
the Kerala Land Tax Act, the respondents are obliged to accept
basic land tax from the petitioner as otherwise it would amount to abdication and dereliction of duties. In that view of the matter, it is ordered that the 1st respondent Village Officer will immediately consider the request for acceptance of basic land tax from the petitioner and will grant the said request without any further delay and will issue receipts in that regard immediately.
bail to Sajahan Ali @ Shahjahan Ali ss The State Of Assam.pdf
The applicant, Sajahan Ali, was arrested in connection with a case registered under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act and POCSO Act for the marriage of a minor girl in 2021. The applicant's lawyer argued that he was merely a Moulana at a Madrassa and was not named in the police complaint. The additional public prosecutor was given time to produce the case diary. The court noted that there were no allegations against the applicant in the FIR. Considering that the applicant has been in custody since February 4th and that the basic allegations are against the husband and family members, the court granted bail to the applicant on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000 with one local surety of like amount.
Additional document against Second Appeal D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017
Additional documents against Second Appeal vide D.No. 183722 dated 03.11.2016 being filed vide D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017 before CIC New Delhi along with FAA, District & Session Judge's reply.
13.12.2021 res judicata applicable in ft
The petitioner challenged a second proceeding initiated against her by the Foreigners Tribunal declaring her a foreigner, despite an earlier tribunal opinion finding she was not a foreigner. The court allows the petition, setting aside the second opinion as violating the Supreme Court ruling that the principle of res judicata applies to Foreigners Tribunal proceedings. As the petitioner's identity was the same in both proceedings and the tribunal made no finding she was different than the earlier proceedee, the second proceeding against the same person cannot be sustained. The petitioner must be released if detained under the second, now set aside, opinion.
kerala hc UAPA order march 17 2022.pdf
The High Court delivered an order in three criminal revision petitions filed against the orders of a Sessions Court rejecting applications for discharge. The revision petitioner was charged with offenses under the Indian Penal Code and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act for being a member of a banned Maoist organization. The key issues were whether there was delay in sanction by the government violating timelines under the rules, and if so whether it vitiated cognizance taken by the special court. The court heard arguments on whether the timelines were mandatory or directory, and if the delayed sanctions invalidated prosecution of the petitioner.
Gauhati HC checks legality of ED summons to Assam newspaper
This order summarizes and addresses a writ petition filed by Jayanta Baruah challenging two notices issued by the Central Bureau of Investigation summoning him to appear as a witness in an ongoing investigation. The court notes the petitioner's objections to the notices and details provided about restrictions on movement in Assam. While the notices were issued under a provision allowing for summons of witnesses, the court finds issues with the short notice periods provided, lack of information on what testimony is sought and from what documents, and timing of the notices in the context of petitioner's journalism work. The court orders the prayer regarding one notice to be disregarded as not pressed, and reserves orders on the other prayers.
Recommended
ashad ali v assam.pdf
1) Ashad Ali, Md. Bidya Hussain, and Sahabuddin Munsi have applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case registered under sections 363/366/376(2)(n) of the IPC and sections 6 of the POCSO Act and 9 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act.
2) The judge heard from the applicants' counsel and the Additional Public Prosecutor representing the state.
3) The judge examined the FIR and documents. Considering the facts and circumstances, the judge granted interim anticipatory bail to the applicants subject to furnishing a bond and surety, and appearing before the investigating officer within 2 weeks to record their statements. The
Delhi court jan 4 bail order (1)
Three separate bail applications were filed on behalf of Osama, Gulfam @ Sonu Chikna, and Aatir who were accused of rioting, looting goods worth Rs. 2 lacs, and burning reharis in a godown. The court noted the careless and perfunctory nature of the investigation and charge sheet, which did not include witness statements. Considering the period of custody and inadequate investigation, the court granted bail to all three accused, subject to conditions that they not leave Delhi jurisdiction, engage in criminal activity, or contact witnesses.
Wpc 40473 /2017 - Non acceptance of Basic tax in Kerala Uploaded by James Jos...
Wpc 40473 /2017 - Non acceptance of Basic tax in Kerala Uploaded by James Jos...Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
Wpc 40473 /2017 - Non acceptance of Basic tax in Kerala Uploaded by James Joseph Adhikarathil 9447464502
it is ordered in the interest of justice that in
case the subject properties obtained by the petitioner pursuant to Exts.P1 and P2 registered sale deeds have already been mutated in favour of the petitioner and the land tax has already been accepted from him as per Ext.P3, then certainly he is the registered
landholder of the subject properties as envisaged in Section 3(3)(d) of the Kerala Land Tax Act,1961, in which case going by the cumulative impact mandate of Section 5 (2) r/w Section 3(3)(d) of
the Kerala Land Tax Act, the respondents are obliged to accept
basic land tax from the petitioner as otherwise it would amount to abdication and dereliction of duties. In that view of the matter, it is ordered that the 1st respondent Village Officer will immediately consider the request for acceptance of basic land tax from the petitioner and will grant the said request without any further delay and will issue receipts in that regard immediately.
bail to Sajahan Ali @ Shahjahan Ali ss The State Of Assam.pdf
The applicant, Sajahan Ali, was arrested in connection with a case registered under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act and POCSO Act for the marriage of a minor girl in 2021. The applicant's lawyer argued that he was merely a Moulana at a Madrassa and was not named in the police complaint. The additional public prosecutor was given time to produce the case diary. The court noted that there were no allegations against the applicant in the FIR. Considering that the applicant has been in custody since February 4th and that the basic allegations are against the husband and family members, the court granted bail to the applicant on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000 with one local surety of like amount.
Additional document against Second Appeal D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017
Additional documents against Second Appeal vide D.No. 183722 dated 03.11.2016 being filed vide D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017 before CIC New Delhi along with FAA, District & Session Judge's reply.
13.12.2021 res judicata applicable in ft
The petitioner challenged a second proceeding initiated against her by the Foreigners Tribunal declaring her a foreigner, despite an earlier tribunal opinion finding she was not a foreigner. The court allows the petition, setting aside the second opinion as violating the Supreme Court ruling that the principle of res judicata applies to Foreigners Tribunal proceedings. As the petitioner's identity was the same in both proceedings and the tribunal made no finding she was different than the earlier proceedee, the second proceeding against the same person cannot be sustained. The petitioner must be released if detained under the second, now set aside, opinion.
kerala hc UAPA order march 17 2022.pdf
The High Court delivered an order in three criminal revision petitions filed against the orders of a Sessions Court rejecting applications for discharge. The revision petitioner was charged with offenses under the Indian Penal Code and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act for being a member of a banned Maoist organization. The key issues were whether there was delay in sanction by the government violating timelines under the rules, and if so whether it vitiated cognizance taken by the special court. The court heard arguments on whether the timelines were mandatory or directory, and if the delayed sanctions invalidated prosecution of the petitioner.
Gauhati HC checks legality of ED summons to Assam newspaper
This order summarizes and addresses a writ petition filed by Jayanta Baruah challenging two notices issued by the Central Bureau of Investigation summoning him to appear as a witness in an ongoing investigation. The court notes the petitioner's objections to the notices and details provided about restrictions on movement in Assam. While the notices were issued under a provision allowing for summons of witnesses, the court finds issues with the short notice periods provided, lack of information on what testimony is sought and from what documents, and timing of the notices in the context of petitioner's journalism work. The court orders the prayer regarding one notice to be disregarded as not pressed, and reserves orders on the other prayers.
Bom hc bail is recruit order
1. The appellant, Iqbal Ahmed Kabir Ahmed, who was the original accused No. 3, filed an application for bail which was rejected by the special judge. He has filed this appeal against the rejection.
2. The key evidence against the appellant includes the recovery of an oath from his house pursuant to disclosure by an co-accused, and pointing out an electric switchboard in his house where an IED was allegedly soldered. Statements of witnesses also indicate the appellant participated in meetings where actions regarding perceived threats to Islam were discussed.
3. The prosecution argues the material is sufficient to show a prima facie case against the appellant and reasonable grounds exist to believe the accusations, thereby invoking the
gauhati-high-court-foreigner-tribunal-03032023-461954.pdf
The court remanded the case back to the Foreigners Tribunal to pass a reasoned order after reviewing the records of two previous cases regarding the petitioner's citizenship status. An earlier opinion declaring the petitioner not a foreigner lacked reasons and was therefore not a valid basis for the principle of res judicata to apply. However, in the interest of justice, the court ordered the Tribunal to consider materials from both previous cases and issue a new reasoned ruling, while no coercive action should be taken against the petitioner until then. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.
SRO can't refuse Regn.for lack of Prior Documents. HC order james joseph adhi...
SRO can't refuse Regn.for lack of Prior Documents. HC order james joseph adhi...Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
The High Court of Kerala heard two writ petitions challenging the refusal of the Sub Registrar to register documents without prior documents showing title. In both cases, the petitioners claimed possessory rights over the properties. The Court allowed both petitions based on prior judgments that the Sub Registrar cannot insist on prior documents and possessory rights can be transferred. The Court directed the Sub Registrars to register the documents in both cases without insisting on prior documents.order13-jan-2023.pdf
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Karuna Shankar against the State of Uttar Pradesh regarding her application for premature release that had been pending for over 3 years without justification. The Court directed the Director General of Prisons to ensure Shankar's application is considered and disposed of within a month and to file an affidavit of compliance. It warned of coercive action if further instances of authorities delaying such applications are found.
Gauhati hc sep 9 order
The document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Asor Uddin challenging a ex-parte order from the Foreigners' Tribunal declaring him to be a foreigner. The High Court allowed the petition, set aside the ex-parte order, and remanded the matter back to the Foreigners' Tribunal for fresh proceedings. However, the petitioner was ordered to remain on bail, appear before the Superintendent of Police, and the Foreigners' Tribunal by certain dates or the ex-parte order would be revived.
20211201 bombay hc bail to sudha bharadwaj (1)
1. The applicant Sudha Bharadwaj filed a bail application challenging the orders passed by Additional Sessions Judge K.D. Vadane on November 26, 2018 extending her detention and February 21, 2019 taking cognizance of offenses.
2. The applicant argued that Judge Vadane lacked jurisdiction as he was not designated as a Special Judge under the NIA Act to try offenses investigated by the NIA. Only Special Courts constituted under the NIA Act had jurisdiction over such scheduled offenses.
3. Therefore, the applicant claimed the orders passed by Judge Vadane were null and void and that she was entitled to default bail as the period of detention had expired.
20211201 bombay hc bail to sudha bharadwaj
1. The applicant Sudha Bharadwaj filed a bail application challenging the orders passed by Additional Sessions Judge K.D. Vadane on November 26, 2018 extending her detention and February 21, 2019 taking cognizance of offenses.
2. The applicant argued that Judge Vadane lacked jurisdiction as he was not designated as a Special Judge under the NIA Act to try offenses investigated by the NIA. Only Special Courts constituted by the state government had jurisdiction in such cases.
3. Therefore, the applicant claimed the detention extension and cognizance orders passed by the judge without jurisdiction were null and void, and that she was entitled to default bail.
District court sends Fawad Chaudhry to jail on judicial remand, again
The court order summarizes a case involving a defendant, Fawad Ahmed Chaudhary, who was charged with sedition and other offenses. The investigation officer requested an additional 4 days of physical remand of the defendant for further investigation. However, the court denied the request, noting the investigation officer had already been given 4 days of remand and failed to show progress on recovering items like the defendant's phone and laptop. While denying more physical remand, the court did order the defendant be sent to 14 days of judicial remand to allow the investigation to be completed.
Braham prakash vs. state
The petitioners sought to quash an FIR registered against them for offenses under Section 308/34 of the Indian Penal Code. During the investigation, the parties, who were related, resolved their disputes through a compromise with the help of village elders. Though the offense of attempted culpable homicide is serious and non-compoundable, the court has previously quashed cases involving Section 307 IPC where parties compromised. Considering that the parties were neighbors seeking peace, and that the court has previously quashed FIRs in serious cases upon compromise, the court allowed the petition and quashed the FIR in this case as well.
Smt_Jayamma_vs_The_State_Of_Karnataka_on_24_January_2020.PDF
This document summarizes a court case in the Karnataka High Court regarding a land dispute between several petitioners and respondents over ownership of 2 acres and 10 guntas of land in Begur Village. The petitioners claimed ownership based on their grandfather and grandmother previously owning portions of the land. The court case involved multiple appeals over several years as the fourth respondent also claimed ownership of portions of the same land. The petitioners filed a writ petition to challenge orders by the Special Tahsildar that directed entering the fourth respondent's name in the land records for the disputed property. The High Court referred several questions to a larger bench regarding the State's powers to adjudicate land disputes and whether certain provisions of the Karnataka Land Revenue
Maqbool alam order
The document is a 3-page court order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a bail application filed by Maqbool Alam, who was charged with several offenses including praising a terrorist organization on Facebook. The court heard arguments from Alam's lawyer and the public prosecutor. Upon reviewing the Facebook posts and finding that they did not require further custodial interrogation, the court granted bail to Alam subject to furnishing a bond and ensuring he does not interfere with the investigation.
Pending court case is not a bar for land tax payment
Pending court case is not a bar for land tax paymentJamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
Pending court case is not a bar for land tax payment Solve your land problems in Kerala - we provide Legal support, assistance and monitoring of your complaints in Bhoomi tharam mattom, nilam , purayidom , thottam ,michabhoomi issues, pattayam , thandapper , pokkuvaravu , land tax , building tax , digital survey , resurvey ,klc , puramboke , pathway disputes, fair value , data bank , issues . James Joseph Adhikarathil , Former Deputy collector Alappuzha 9447464502. Service available all over KeralaSonali order 2(1)
1. The court is following up on orders it previously passed on July 1st and August 27th directing state authorities in Jharkhand to comply with Supreme Court orders regarding treatment, aftercare, and rehabilitation of acid attack victims.
2. The Supreme Court had convened a meeting where it was decided that states must treat acid attack victims, involve private hospitals, not refuse treatment, provide first aid and further care, and take action against non-compliant hospitals.
3. The court is unhappy that Jharkhand authorities have not provided a concrete response or shown compliance with the Supreme Court orders, and warns that the Chief Secretary and other officials may have to appear in person at the next hearing if no affidavit
Misher ali-judgment-24-mar-2021 (1)
The Supreme Court of India allowed the appeals of Md. Misher Ali against an order declaring him a foreigner. [The Court summarized that] the Foreigner's Tribunal and High Court orders were passed in violation of principles of natural justice as notice was not served at Ali's permanent residence, which was known to authorities. The Court set aside the orders and remanded the case back to the Foreigner's Tribunal to allow Ali an opportunity to respond consistent with principles of natural justice.
gauhati-hc-order-1-426051.pdf
This document is a 3-page court order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Mujib Rohman and Sheikh Rustam against the State of Assam and others regarding a notice prohibiting the sale of beef in the Sonari Municipal area. The petitioners' counsel argued that their clients have been conducting this business for generations and the new Cattle Preservation Act does not mandate a complete ban, only regulating the process. The court issued notice to the respondents returnable by July 25th and directed the state counsel to obtain instructions on the interim relief sought and steps taken to allocate sites for petitioners to conduct their business according to the new law.
Surendragadlingtemporarybailorder30thjuly2021 397659
The appellant appealed against an order rejecting his application for temporary bail to attend the last rites of his deceased mother. The court heard the appeal and considered additional information provided in an affidavit. While the original reason for seeking temporary bail no longer applied due to time passed, the court found humanitarian grounds to grant temporary bail for the appellant to attend rituals and a condolence meeting for his mother scheduled on the anniversary of her death. The court ordered the appellant's release on temporary bail from August 13-21, 2021 subject to furnishing a bond and sureties, and reporting to police.
Embed-6 (1).pdfc p;p;kdk[odk[drskpokpopo
लाइव लॉ ने न्यायमूर्ति गवई के हवाले से यह भी कहा, “राज्य (मध्य प्रदेश) ऐसे मामले में एक अतिरिक्त महाधिवक्ता को पेश करने में क्यों दिलचस्पी ले रहा है?” वह भी कैविएट पर?! जाहिर है, यह उत्पीड़न का मामला लगता है! किसी को उसे (याचिकाकर्ता को) परेशान करने में दिलचस्पी है!
Orissa HC grants bail to CCL.pdf
This 3 page court order summarizes a bail application hearing for a petitioner accused of serious crimes who has been in custody since 2018. The court notes that the case has been delayed multiple times because the investigating agency failed to provide the requested case diary documents. Considering the long period of custody, the court grants the petitioner bail on terms to be set by the lower court, and requests the home secretary and police leaders to take corrective action so the police are more responsive to court needs.
8284 of 2019 gauhati hc
This document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a petition filed by Rahima Khatun challenging an ex-parte order from the Foreigners Tribunal declaring her an illegal migrant. The High Court remanded the matter back to the Foreigners Tribunal for reconsideration of Rahima Khatun's citizenship status, after hearing from her. It also directed Rahima Khatun to appear before the Superintendent of Police within 15 days to provide information and furnish a bail bond, and not leave the district without permission. The records were then remitted back to the Foreigners Tribunal for further proceedings.
Guj hc pasa aug 25 order
The High Court of Gujarat quashed four detention orders issued by the District Magistrate of Amreli under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act against four petitioners for allegedly being "property grabbers". The Court found that the detaining authority erred in treating the petitioners' activities as prejudicial to public order, as it was a private property dispute. The Court also noted that the justification provided by the state for issuing the detention orders - that the petitioners would continue illegal activities with advocate help - was untenable. The rule was made absolute and the detention orders were quashed.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
More Related Content
Similar to Lutfor Ali v assam.pdf
Bom hc bail is recruit order
1. The appellant, Iqbal Ahmed Kabir Ahmed, who was the original accused No. 3, filed an application for bail which was rejected by the special judge. He has filed this appeal against the rejection.
2. The key evidence against the appellant includes the recovery of an oath from his house pursuant to disclosure by an co-accused, and pointing out an electric switchboard in his house where an IED was allegedly soldered. Statements of witnesses also indicate the appellant participated in meetings where actions regarding perceived threats to Islam were discussed.
3. The prosecution argues the material is sufficient to show a prima facie case against the appellant and reasonable grounds exist to believe the accusations, thereby invoking the
gauhati-high-court-foreigner-tribunal-03032023-461954.pdf
The court remanded the case back to the Foreigners Tribunal to pass a reasoned order after reviewing the records of two previous cases regarding the petitioner's citizenship status. An earlier opinion declaring the petitioner not a foreigner lacked reasons and was therefore not a valid basis for the principle of res judicata to apply. However, in the interest of justice, the court ordered the Tribunal to consider materials from both previous cases and issue a new reasoned ruling, while no coercive action should be taken against the petitioner until then. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.
SRO can't refuse Regn.for lack of Prior Documents. HC order james joseph adhi...
SRO can't refuse Regn.for lack of Prior Documents. HC order james joseph adhi...Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
The High Court of Kerala heard two writ petitions challenging the refusal of the Sub Registrar to register documents without prior documents showing title. In both cases, the petitioners claimed possessory rights over the properties. The Court allowed both petitions based on prior judgments that the Sub Registrar cannot insist on prior documents and possessory rights can be transferred. The Court directed the Sub Registrars to register the documents in both cases without insisting on prior documents.order13-jan-2023.pdf
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Karuna Shankar against the State of Uttar Pradesh regarding her application for premature release that had been pending for over 3 years without justification. The Court directed the Director General of Prisons to ensure Shankar's application is considered and disposed of within a month and to file an affidavit of compliance. It warned of coercive action if further instances of authorities delaying such applications are found.
Gauhati hc sep 9 order
The document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Asor Uddin challenging a ex-parte order from the Foreigners' Tribunal declaring him to be a foreigner. The High Court allowed the petition, set aside the ex-parte order, and remanded the matter back to the Foreigners' Tribunal for fresh proceedings. However, the petitioner was ordered to remain on bail, appear before the Superintendent of Police, and the Foreigners' Tribunal by certain dates or the ex-parte order would be revived.
20211201 bombay hc bail to sudha bharadwaj (1)
1. The applicant Sudha Bharadwaj filed a bail application challenging the orders passed by Additional Sessions Judge K.D. Vadane on November 26, 2018 extending her detention and February 21, 2019 taking cognizance of offenses.
2. The applicant argued that Judge Vadane lacked jurisdiction as he was not designated as a Special Judge under the NIA Act to try offenses investigated by the NIA. Only Special Courts constituted under the NIA Act had jurisdiction over such scheduled offenses.
3. Therefore, the applicant claimed the orders passed by Judge Vadane were null and void and that she was entitled to default bail as the period of detention had expired.
20211201 bombay hc bail to sudha bharadwaj
1. The applicant Sudha Bharadwaj filed a bail application challenging the orders passed by Additional Sessions Judge K.D. Vadane on November 26, 2018 extending her detention and February 21, 2019 taking cognizance of offenses.
2. The applicant argued that Judge Vadane lacked jurisdiction as he was not designated as a Special Judge under the NIA Act to try offenses investigated by the NIA. Only Special Courts constituted by the state government had jurisdiction in such cases.
3. Therefore, the applicant claimed the detention extension and cognizance orders passed by the judge without jurisdiction were null and void, and that she was entitled to default bail.
District court sends Fawad Chaudhry to jail on judicial remand, again
The court order summarizes a case involving a defendant, Fawad Ahmed Chaudhary, who was charged with sedition and other offenses. The investigation officer requested an additional 4 days of physical remand of the defendant for further investigation. However, the court denied the request, noting the investigation officer had already been given 4 days of remand and failed to show progress on recovering items like the defendant's phone and laptop. While denying more physical remand, the court did order the defendant be sent to 14 days of judicial remand to allow the investigation to be completed.
Braham prakash vs. state
The petitioners sought to quash an FIR registered against them for offenses under Section 308/34 of the Indian Penal Code. During the investigation, the parties, who were related, resolved their disputes through a compromise with the help of village elders. Though the offense of attempted culpable homicide is serious and non-compoundable, the court has previously quashed cases involving Section 307 IPC where parties compromised. Considering that the parties were neighbors seeking peace, and that the court has previously quashed FIRs in serious cases upon compromise, the court allowed the petition and quashed the FIR in this case as well.
Smt_Jayamma_vs_The_State_Of_Karnataka_on_24_January_2020.PDF
This document summarizes a court case in the Karnataka High Court regarding a land dispute between several petitioners and respondents over ownership of 2 acres and 10 guntas of land in Begur Village. The petitioners claimed ownership based on their grandfather and grandmother previously owning portions of the land. The court case involved multiple appeals over several years as the fourth respondent also claimed ownership of portions of the same land. The petitioners filed a writ petition to challenge orders by the Special Tahsildar that directed entering the fourth respondent's name in the land records for the disputed property. The High Court referred several questions to a larger bench regarding the State's powers to adjudicate land disputes and whether certain provisions of the Karnataka Land Revenue
Maqbool alam order
The document is a 3-page court order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a bail application filed by Maqbool Alam, who was charged with several offenses including praising a terrorist organization on Facebook. The court heard arguments from Alam's lawyer and the public prosecutor. Upon reviewing the Facebook posts and finding that they did not require further custodial interrogation, the court granted bail to Alam subject to furnishing a bond and ensuring he does not interfere with the investigation.
Pending court case is not a bar for land tax payment
Pending court case is not a bar for land tax paymentJamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
Pending court case is not a bar for land tax payment Solve your land problems in Kerala - we provide Legal support, assistance and monitoring of your complaints in Bhoomi tharam mattom, nilam , purayidom , thottam ,michabhoomi issues, pattayam , thandapper , pokkuvaravu , land tax , building tax , digital survey , resurvey ,klc , puramboke , pathway disputes, fair value , data bank , issues . James Joseph Adhikarathil , Former Deputy collector Alappuzha 9447464502. Service available all over KeralaSonali order 2(1)
1. The court is following up on orders it previously passed on July 1st and August 27th directing state authorities in Jharkhand to comply with Supreme Court orders regarding treatment, aftercare, and rehabilitation of acid attack victims.
2. The Supreme Court had convened a meeting where it was decided that states must treat acid attack victims, involve private hospitals, not refuse treatment, provide first aid and further care, and take action against non-compliant hospitals.
3. The court is unhappy that Jharkhand authorities have not provided a concrete response or shown compliance with the Supreme Court orders, and warns that the Chief Secretary and other officials may have to appear in person at the next hearing if no affidavit
Misher ali-judgment-24-mar-2021 (1)
The Supreme Court of India allowed the appeals of Md. Misher Ali against an order declaring him a foreigner. [The Court summarized that] the Foreigner's Tribunal and High Court orders were passed in violation of principles of natural justice as notice was not served at Ali's permanent residence, which was known to authorities. The Court set aside the orders and remanded the case back to the Foreigner's Tribunal to allow Ali an opportunity to respond consistent with principles of natural justice.
gauhati-hc-order-1-426051.pdf
This document is a 3-page court order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Mujib Rohman and Sheikh Rustam against the State of Assam and others regarding a notice prohibiting the sale of beef in the Sonari Municipal area. The petitioners' counsel argued that their clients have been conducting this business for generations and the new Cattle Preservation Act does not mandate a complete ban, only regulating the process. The court issued notice to the respondents returnable by July 25th and directed the state counsel to obtain instructions on the interim relief sought and steps taken to allocate sites for petitioners to conduct their business according to the new law.
Surendragadlingtemporarybailorder30thjuly2021 397659
The appellant appealed against an order rejecting his application for temporary bail to attend the last rites of his deceased mother. The court heard the appeal and considered additional information provided in an affidavit. While the original reason for seeking temporary bail no longer applied due to time passed, the court found humanitarian grounds to grant temporary bail for the appellant to attend rituals and a condolence meeting for his mother scheduled on the anniversary of her death. The court ordered the appellant's release on temporary bail from August 13-21, 2021 subject to furnishing a bond and sureties, and reporting to police.
Embed-6 (1).pdfc p;p;kdk[odk[drskpokpopo
लाइव लॉ ने न्यायमूर्ति गवई के हवाले से यह भी कहा, “राज्य (मध्य प्रदेश) ऐसे मामले में एक अतिरिक्त महाधिवक्ता को पेश करने में क्यों दिलचस्पी ले रहा है?” वह भी कैविएट पर?! जाहिर है, यह उत्पीड़न का मामला लगता है! किसी को उसे (याचिकाकर्ता को) परेशान करने में दिलचस्पी है!
Orissa HC grants bail to CCL.pdf
This 3 page court order summarizes a bail application hearing for a petitioner accused of serious crimes who has been in custody since 2018. The court notes that the case has been delayed multiple times because the investigating agency failed to provide the requested case diary documents. Considering the long period of custody, the court grants the petitioner bail on terms to be set by the lower court, and requests the home secretary and police leaders to take corrective action so the police are more responsive to court needs.
8284 of 2019 gauhati hc
This document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a petition filed by Rahima Khatun challenging an ex-parte order from the Foreigners Tribunal declaring her an illegal migrant. The High Court remanded the matter back to the Foreigners Tribunal for reconsideration of Rahima Khatun's citizenship status, after hearing from her. It also directed Rahima Khatun to appear before the Superintendent of Police within 15 days to provide information and furnish a bail bond, and not leave the district without permission. The records were then remitted back to the Foreigners Tribunal for further proceedings.
Guj hc pasa aug 25 order
The High Court of Gujarat quashed four detention orders issued by the District Magistrate of Amreli under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act against four petitioners for allegedly being "property grabbers". The Court found that the detaining authority erred in treating the petitioners' activities as prejudicial to public order, as it was a private property dispute. The Court also noted that the justification provided by the state for issuing the detention orders - that the petitioners would continue illegal activities with advocate help - was untenable. The rule was made absolute and the detention orders were quashed.
Similar to Lutfor Ali v assam.pdf (20)
gauhati-high-court-foreigner-tribunal-03032023-461954.pdf
gauhati-high-court-foreigner-tribunal-03032023-461954.pdf
SRO can't refuse Regn.for lack of Prior Documents. HC order james joseph adhi...
SRO can't refuse Regn.for lack of Prior Documents. HC order james joseph adhi...
District court sends Fawad Chaudhry to jail on judicial remand, again
District court sends Fawad Chaudhry to jail on judicial remand, again
Smt_Jayamma_vs_The_State_Of_Karnataka_on_24_January_2020.PDF
Smt_Jayamma_vs_The_State_Of_Karnataka_on_24_January_2020.PDF
Pending court case is not a bar for land tax payment
Pending court case is not a bar for land tax payment
Surendragadlingtemporarybailorder30thjuly2021 397659
Surendragadlingtemporarybailorder30thjuly2021 397659
Recently uploaded
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Business Laws Sunita saha
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional and judicial approach
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptxGodwin Emmanuel Oyedokun MBA MSc PhD FCA FCTI FCNA CFE FFAR
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptx
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...Syed Muhammad Humza Hussain
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Incometax Compliance_PF_ ESI- June 2024
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
USDA grants bolster rural communities, driving growth, sustainability, and prosperity through strategic development initiatives and financial support.
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Pim Betist's presentation about generative AI in the legal sector at Lexpo.com '24
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
Presentation by Justin Ordoyo
University of the Philippines College of Law
The Art and Science of Cryptoforensic Investigation: Best Practices and Tools
The Art and Science of Cryptoforensic Investigation: Best Practices and Tools
Recently uploaded (20)
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
The Art and Science of Cryptoforensic Investigation: Best Practices and Tools
The Art and Science of Cryptoforensic Investigation: Best Practices and Tools
Lutfor Ali v assam.pdf
- 1. Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010027762023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/413/2023 LUTFOR ALI AND 3 ORS S/O- RAKMAT MOLLAH, PERMANENT R/O- VILL BHANDARA PART-III, P.S- MANIKPUR, DIST- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM 2: RAKMAT MOLLAH S/O- SHAHAR MOLLAH PERMANENT R/O- VILL- BHANDARA PART-III P.S- MANIKPUR DIST- BONGAIGAON ASSAM 3: JORINA KHATUN W/O- LATE ABDUL HUSSAIN SIKDAR PERMANENT R/O- VILL- GOLAPARA PART-IV P.S- ABHAYAPURI DIST- BONGAIGAON ASSAM 4: AL HUSSAIN SIKDAR @ EKBUL HUSSAIN SIKDAR S/O- LATE ABDUL HUSSAIN SIKDAR R/O- VILL- GOLAPARA PART-IV P.S- ABHAYAPURI DIST- BONGAIGAON ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : A W AMAN
- 2. Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM ORDER Date : 14-02-2023 Heard Mr. S. Nawaz, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Mr. D. Das, learned Addl. P.P. Assam appearing for the State. Apprehending arrest in connection with Abhayapuri P.S. Case No. 22/2023 registered under Sections 9/10 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 the four applicants have approached this Court by filing the present application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail. I have perused the FIR as well as the documents available on record. Also considered the submissions made at the bar. Call for the Case Diary fixing 13-03-2023. Heard on the prayer of interim anticipatory bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, it is hereby provided that, in the event of arrest, the applicants, viz. Lutfor Ali, Rakmat Mollah, Jorina Khatun and Ikbal Hussain Sikdar @ Ekbul Hussain Sikdar shall be allowed to go on pre-arrest bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000/- each with one local surety each of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority. It is, however, made clear that the applicants shall appear before the Investigating Officer within 02 weeks from today for recording their statements. Let this matter be listed again on 13-03-2023. JUDGE GS
- 3. Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant