The document discusses using Second Life as a virtual learning environment. It proposes interviewing experts to score Second Life based on three variables: A (attention), D (depth of thinking), and E (efficiency). The interview questions would focus on how Second Life might rate for each variable as a potential learning tool. The results would be analyzed and reported to determine Second Life's added value for teaching and learning.

1. Serious game? of schoolplein!

3. Wat is de meerwaarde van een virtuele wereld als Second Life? Voor leren en onderwijzen http://aggiornamento-ii.blogspot.com/ © 2008, Joop van Schie

4. Observatie 1: Dingen anders doen http://theseventhsun.com/1107_mindMap.htm Butch Dae: conceptmapping © 2008, Joop van Schie

5. Observatie 2: Andere dingen doen http://www.youtube.com/watch?v= ehSeGeBAbzQ Milan Brynner: Proof of concept © 2008, Joop van Schie

6. Observatie 3: Dingen voor doen http://aggiornamento-ii.blogspot.com/ Een heel legioen: experimenteren © 2008, Joop van Schie

7. Observatie 4: Dingen over doen http://aggiornamento-ii.blogspot.com/ Zeer velen: Signpost in Second Life © 2008, Joop van Schie

8. Waarom ga je het niet vragen? © 2008, Joop van Schie EdTek Zeno Scot Jung Joop Zuhal

9. Power = A * D * E http://www.infinitethinking.org/2007/03/itm-extra-p-x-d-x-e.html © 2008, Joop van Schie

10. The interview tries to find out what your expert-opinion is on the likely or potential added value- or power- for teaching and learning. I will ask you to score Second Life as a learning environment using the three variables The elements A, D and E can be explained as: A (attention) = the likely level of attention given by your students to Second Life as a learning environment working with, looking at, listening to and thinking about what you want them to, D (depth) = the likely degree to which the students thinking is involved in using Second Life for a learning task, E (efficiency) = the likely learning by students needed to master Second Life at such skill that is does not distract from the learning task in relation to the effect. Likely or potential added value © 2008, Joop van Schie

12. Interviewtechniek: IM+script 12:15] Joop Zuhal: i ll give u Q3 now [12:15] John Doe: btw -- the first question is influenced by whether students are working in a group next to each other or if they are working on their own when "in world" for class [12:15] John Doe accepted your inventory offer . [12:15] Joop Zuhal: ok, ur score please [12:16] John Doe: can I ask a clarifying question? [12:16] Joop Zuhal: of coruse [12:17] John Doe: does Q3 relate to getting people into SL, building the learning activity, and all related items, assuming starting from 0? [12:17] Joop Zuhal: yes [12:17] John Doe: with all of that in mind, I would say a 4 © 2008, Joop van Schie

13. Interviewtechniek: Notecards © 2008, Joop van Schie

14. Ordening uitkomsten interviews © R. Garisson, T. Anderson http://www.communityofinquiry.com/ © 2008, Joop van Schie

15. © 2008, Joop van Schie