3. Where does the
money go?
Where do the people come from?
Which regions
rely the most on
Europe?
4. Remittance outflows from main sending European countries, 2014
The sending side…
Remittance outflows from main sending European countries, 2014
(Countries with annual GDP per capita > US$20,000)
The top 10
European
countries
account for
82% of the
outflows’’
Outflows form
Europe
represent 0.7%
GDP of
sending
countries
European
diasporas
have US$100
million
accumulated
in savings
5. …Russia send
the most of the
remittances to
Central Asia and
Eastern
Europe…
..Remittances
from the UK
mainly go to Asia
and Africa..
…France flows
mainly go to
countries in
Africa…
…A significant
amount of
remittances form
Germany go to
Turkey and
eastern Europe…
6. Receiving Europe…
One-third (US$36.5 billion) of flows remain in Europe
‘’The most
remittance-reliant
countries have a
significant rural
population’’
35%
Rural
Population
7. Sending remittances from Europe costs 7.3% - slightly
below world average
Average
Europe
Western
Europe
Russia
8.3%
7.3% 7.9% World average
Costs to send $US200 from…
Costs increase when
Costs decrease when
2.4%
“A reduction to 5 per cent would save migrants and their families more than
US$2.5 billion in transfer costs per year.”
8. Mobile Operators
Online services
Banks
Banks play a major role
as distribution channel
for MTOs for sending and
receiving flows in
Europe.
MTOs
MTOs represent
70 per cent of all RSPs
in the marketplace in
receiving Europe.
These MTOs operate
with their own license
or in partnership with
banks and postal
networks
“Cash-to-cash continues to be the most used
method for migrants in Europe, as in the rest of the world, to send money
home.”
Receiving Europe
Actors in the marketplace
There are over 200 remittance service providers (RSPs) in Europe.
Postal networks
Mobile and online
platforms offer less
expensive products
but still struggle to
convince clients
Postal networks
represent 30% of payout
locations in receiving
Europe.
They account for 85% of
payout locations in rural
areas.
Their market share is still
limited.
9. Maximizing the impact of
remittances
“Access”
Strengthen the
remittance rural
market
“Use”
Promote Financial
Inclusion
“Investment back home”
Promote investment of
remittances
and migrant
savings
1
2
3
Financial Inclusion – Identified opportunities
10. - Leveraging the impact of remittances requires differentiated,
contextualized and concerted policies and strategies between
remittance sending and receiving countries.
- Regional harmonization is necessary to increase competition,
expand financial options and lower risks.
- Competition could be enhanced by reducing regulatory
limitations, promoting diversity in the marketplace, providing
incentives for banking institutions to offer low-cost transfers,
and nurturing the positive impact of new technologies.
Market Policy implications
11. “…its their Money”
• Shift transactions from “cash to cash” to “account to
account”
• Encourage use and adoption of new technologies
• Support financial education for both senders and receivers
• Promote savings
• Utilize remittances to establish credit history
• Empower migrant workers and their families with more
options to invest
• Leverage development in local communities
Opportunities
Editor's Notes
World context: Stock of migrants and remittances flows worldwide and world average cost.
International migrants are expected to surpass 250 million in 2015.
Migrants’ remittances to developing countries reached $436 billion in 2014.
World average cost for sending remittances is almost 8%.
Rural areas are where remittances count the most: 40% of all remittances.
Key message 1: Total flows from Europe were US$109 bn. There are 50 million migrants living in Europe
150 million people in developing countries benefit from remittances sent by migrant workers from Europe.
Europe is now a major sending region after being historically a net receiver of remittances for much of the previous century.
Europe has 10% of the world’s population,
Europe has 20% of all migrant workers (50 million)
Europe is the source of 25% of global remittance flows.
Key message 2:
Where do the people come from?
- Migrants mainly come from Eastern Europe (39%) followed by Asia (25%),
Where does the money go? Mainly EUROPE
One third to eastern European countries
Two-thirds (US$72.9 billion) of flows go to developing countries in regions outside Europe
- Asia receives the largest amount (US$35 billion)
Which regions rely the most on Europe? Mainly EUROPE
- North Africa and Central Asia are the Regions beyond Europe most reliant on European remittances, largely from France and Russia respectively
- Latin America and the Caribbean receive US$6 billion mainly from Spain.
Key message 3: SENDING SIDE – FLOWS
- The top 10 European sending countries account for 82 per cent of the outflows.
- The top 6 sending European countries (RUSSIA, UK, GERMANY, FRANCE, ITALY, SPAIN) are also among the world’s top sending countries.
- Russia is the top sender at US$20 billion almost all to Eastern Europe and Central Asia.
?? Drain from Europe ??
- Flows represent less than 0.7% of annual GDP of sending countries (US178 GDP per capita)
- In comparison, these flows are often 50% or more of income of receiving households in developing countries, and can equal up to 39 per cent of receiving countries’ annual GDP.
Highlights:
IN SLIDE
Migrants in Russia send the most remittances - US$20 billion - mainly to Central Asia and Eastern Europe.
Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan rely fully on the Russian Federation for their remittances.
Flows from the UK amount US$17 billion.
Fifty per cent of flows from the UK go to six Asian countries: India, Pakistan, China, Philippines, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. In Europe main recipient is Poland. And in Africa the main recipient is Nigeria.
Flows from Germany amount US$14.
Poland is the main EU recipient of remittance flows from Germany.
- Turkey is the most reliant on remittances from Germany (48 per cent of its flows are from Germany).
- Flows from France amount US$10 billion
North Africa and sub-Saharan countries are the most reliant on remittances from France.
NOT IN SLIDE
Flows from Italy amount US$ 10 billion
Italy’s flows are diversified mainly in 3 regions: Asia, Europe and Africa
Flows from Spain amount US$9.6 billion.
Spain is the main link to LAC, but also one of the main sources of remittances for North Africa.
Key message 5: RECEIVING SIDE – FLOWS
EUROPE:
There are 19 major remittance-receiving countries in Europe, led by Ukraine, Poland, Serbia and Romania.
80% of these remittances - US$36.5 billion - come from European sending countries.
- The 9 non-EU European countries, which are mostly agriculture-based economies, are the most reliant on remittances from Europe.
Remittances from Europe represent an important share of GDP for Moldova (22%), Kosovo (17%) and Bosnia-Herzegovina (10%).
Remittances as a percentage of annual GDP:
- 10 EU countries: between 1.2% and 5.2%
9 non-EU European countries: between 2% and 25%
Key message 6: Cost of sending money are coming down but still too high
- US$ 200 is the most typical amount sent by migrants.
- Average European cost at 7.3% is slightly below world average- 7.9%.
However,
Western Europe is above world average at 8.3%
Russia has the lowest costs: 2.4%
Trends:
- Competition among MTOs and wide dispersal of payout locations are key drivers of reducing costs
- High costs are due to dominant positions of major MTOs, high exchange rate commissions or high bank transfer fees
- Limited information is often a barrier to using the least expensive remittance option
Highlights:
MTOs – Money Transfer Operators:
Cash-to-cash remains the preferred option for migrants in Europe, as in the rest of the world, to send money home.
The three global MTOs, are present on both the sending and receiving sides and dominate the market: MoneyGram International (MG), Ria, and Western Union International (WU).
BANKS in Europe:
Are also a major collection and distribution channel for sending and receiving remittance flows.
Mainly act as agents of MTOs, without providing financial services to remittance clients.
Generally provide expensive account-to-account services.
Postal networks:
Postal networks are widely present in the market but their potential is still largely under-utilized, particularly in rural areas
Mobile Operators and Online Services:
- Are less expensive, and provide a good alternative for receiving money in rural areas.
- Regulatory frameworks in the EU still require harmonization in order to promote innovation
- Banks are increasingly reluctant to host the accounts of innovative technology-based operators
- Online platforms offer less expensive products but still struggle to convince clients