SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Download to read offline
UNDER 1 year
Rear-facing car seat
ages 1 to 3
Rear-facing car seat until seat is
outgrown, then forward-facing seat
with harness
MISSISSIPPI
CHILD
RESTRAINT
laws
UNDER FOUR YEARS
Child restraint device or system.
ages 4 to 6
Under 4’9” tall and weigh less than
65 lbs- booster seat system
national
recommendations
for child
passenger safety To evaluate the effectiveness
of Mississippi’s child restraint
programs, observational
surveys are conducted annually
in cities throughout the state.
The surveys and data analysis
provide a basis for conclusions
about the usage of child
restraints in Mississippi. Child
restraint use in Mississippi was
found to be 81.1% for the
year 2014. This rate reflects
a decrease of 2.6% from last
year’s finding (83.7% in 2013).
In comparison to other states,
child restraint use in Mississippi
continues to lag behind the
norm. The most current figures
from the National Occupant
Protection Use Survey (NOPUS)
indicate the national average of
child restraint use for children
under age 8 in 2013 as 89%.
child
restraint use
in mississippi
ages 4 to 7
Forward-facing seat until seat is
outgrown, then booster seat.
ages 8 to 12
Booster seat until Child is big
enough to be properly restrained by
vehicle seat belt alone
(Occupant Restraint Use in 2013: Results
From the National Occupant Protection Use
Survey Controlled Intersection Study DOT HS
812 080, January 2015).
Prepared for:
Mississippi Governor’s Office of Highway Safety
Division of Public Safety Planning
Mississippi Department of Public Safety
Prepared by:
J. W. Landrum Observational Survey Laboratory
David R. Parrish, Drew Morgan,
and Daniel Suddoth
MISSISSIPPI
CHILD
RESTRAINT
SURVEY
2
0
1
4
restraint
usages of
children
and adults
In the 2014 Mississippi child restraint study,
there were 5,885 vehicles observed in 40
municipalities during the survey period from
March to June. These cars contained a total
of 7,619 children estimated to be under the
age of 7. A complete analysis of the data
resulted in a 2014 overall calculated child
restraint usage rate of 81.1% for Mississippi.
Table 1: Child Restraint Used by Type of Location
Type of Location
Using
Restraints
Children
Observed
Percent Using
Restraints
(%)
1. Fast Food 883 1088 81.2 %
2. Large Shopping Mall 138 158 87.3%
3. Grocery Store 393 493 79.7%
4. Daycare or Child Learning Center 1415 1841 76.9%
5. Health Dept. or Human Resources 346 410 84.4%
6. Medical Care Complex 314 370 84.9%
7. Playground, Park, Museum or Zoo 129 143 90.2%
8. Small Shopping Center or Walmart 931 1186 78.5%
9. Discount or Dollar Store 232 285 81.4%
10. Street Intersection 952 1149 82.9%
11. Church or Church Nursery 387 418 90.4%
12. Service Station 37 45 82.2%
13. Restaurant 24 25 96.0%
14. Post Office 3 3 100%
15. Bank 4 5 80.0%
Totals 6179 7619 81.1%
Table 1 provides information on the type of location, the number of children
observed, and whether or not they were restrained. It should be noted that none of
the locations are definitive of child restraint use at that type of location, but only
provide some indication of the level of restraint use.
Gender
Using Seat
Belt
Total Number of
Observations
Percent
Using Seat
Belts (%)
Male 1197 1170 67.6%
Female 2864 4035 71.0%
Totals 4061 5805 70.0%
Table 2: Seat Belt Usage Status for Drivers
In Table 2, the
percentage of drivers
using seat belts by
gender is presented. Of
the drivers observed,
71.0% of the female
drivers were belted while
67.6% of the male drivers
buckled-up. Overall,
70.0% of the drivers
observed were belted.
Child restraint use by
seating position of child
Male drivers were slightly more
likely to place a child on the
front seat than were female
drivers. Children in vehicles
driven by male drivers were
placed on the front seat of the
automobile 24.2% of the time
as compared to 20.5% when
the driver of the vehicle was
female. Children placed on the
front seat, as opposed to the
back seat, were more likely to
be unrestrained regardless of
the sex of the driver.
Female drivers are slightly
more likely to buckle children in
the back seat when compared
to male drivers. The data
suggests about 84.5% of
male drivers will utilize some
kind of child restraint for
backseat children when they
are in control of the vehicle,
and likewise about 86.3% of
female drivers buckle up children in the back when in control of the vehicle. Obviously
educational efforts directed at restraining children in motor vehicles and also placing
these children on the back seat for safety reasons have had some positive effects in
the state of Mississippi. Refer to Table 4 for more details.
It is known that the safest place
for a child to be restrained, or for
that matter to ride unrestrained,
is on the back seat (or second
row of seats) of a vehicle. It would
therefore be expected that adults
putting children in the back seat
of a vehicle would also have more
awareness of the importance of
using child restraints. The
seating position, as well as the
restraint status of the child, was
recorded in this survey. As expected, children on the back seat of automobiles were
restrained at a higher rate than were those on the front seat. Table 3 shows children
in the back seat were restrained at a rate of 85.7% while children on the front seat
were restrained at a rate of 65.6%.
Table 3: Child Restraint by Position of Child
Seating
Position
of Child
Children
Restrained
Total Number of
Children Observed
Count
Percent
(%)
Count
Percent
(%)
1. Front
Seat
1076 65.6% 1639 21.6%
2. Back
Seat
5087 85.7% 5933 78.4%
Totals 6163 81.4% 7572 100%
Males
Seating
Position
of Child
Children Restrained
Total Number of
Children Observed
Count
Percent
(%)
Count
Percent
(%)
Front 363 65.1% 558 24.2%
Back 1473 84.5% 1744 75.8%
Totals 1836 79.8% 2302 100%
Females
Seating
Position
of Child
Child Restrained
Total Number of
Children Observed
Count
Percent
(%)
Count
Percent
(%)
Front 713 66.0% 1081 20.5%
Back 3614 86.3% 4189 79.5%
Totals 4327 82.1% 5270 100%
Table 4: Child Restraint by Position
of Child by gender of driver

More Related Content

Similar to MS Restraint Survey Results

Child Health Information for Dona Ana County
Child Health Information for Dona Ana CountyChild Health Information for Dona Ana County
Child Health Information for Dona Ana CountyScott Krahling
 
Matthew Trowbridge, M.D., MPH - "How Our Built Environments Impact Children's...
Matthew Trowbridge, M.D., MPH - "How Our Built Environments Impact Children's...Matthew Trowbridge, M.D., MPH - "How Our Built Environments Impact Children's...
Matthew Trowbridge, M.D., MPH - "How Our Built Environments Impact Children's...youth_nex
 
Retroalimentacion con papas
Retroalimentacion con papasRetroalimentacion con papas
Retroalimentacion con papasSisercom SAC
 
1Standards & Electrical Safety OverviewApplicable Sta.docx
1Standards & Electrical Safety OverviewApplicable Sta.docx1Standards & Electrical Safety OverviewApplicable Sta.docx
1Standards & Electrical Safety OverviewApplicable Sta.docxfelicidaddinwoodie
 
215548180 Thiswana ass1.docx
215548180 Thiswana ass1.docx215548180 Thiswana ass1.docx
215548180 Thiswana ass1.docxMukovheThiswana
 
Child car seat rules mostly ignored, study finds
Child car seat rules mostly ignored, study findsChild car seat rules mostly ignored, study finds
Child car seat rules mostly ignored, study finds1carseats
 
Child car seat rules mostly ignored, study finds
Child car seat rules mostly ignored, study findsChild car seat rules mostly ignored, study finds
Child car seat rules mostly ignored, study finds1carseats
 
Car Seat Placement Investigation Training
Car Seat Placement Investigation TrainingCar Seat Placement Investigation Training
Car Seat Placement Investigation TrainingAbreaJohnson
 
Rear Facing Car Seat Invesigation
Rear Facing Car Seat InvesigationRear Facing Car Seat Invesigation
Rear Facing Car Seat InvesigationAbreaJohnson
 
TEENTRAKKER Presentation
TEENTRAKKER PresentationTEENTRAKKER Presentation
TEENTRAKKER PresentationIan Messinger
 
WSB Evaluation Results
WSB Evaluation ResultsWSB Evaluation Results
WSB Evaluation ResultsTim Pehlke
 
Ijpsr14 05-11-015
Ijpsr14 05-11-015Ijpsr14 05-11-015
Ijpsr14 05-11-015alem teka
 
Employment - Sample Writing - Undergraduate Research Study
Employment - Sample Writing - Undergraduate Research StudyEmployment - Sample Writing - Undergraduate Research Study
Employment - Sample Writing - Undergraduate Research StudyKeli Gerling
 

Similar to MS Restraint Survey Results (20)

Child Health Information for Dona Ana County
Child Health Information for Dona Ana CountyChild Health Information for Dona Ana County
Child Health Information for Dona Ana County
 
Matthew Trowbridge, M.D., MPH - "How Our Built Environments Impact Children's...
Matthew Trowbridge, M.D., MPH - "How Our Built Environments Impact Children's...Matthew Trowbridge, M.D., MPH - "How Our Built Environments Impact Children's...
Matthew Trowbridge, M.D., MPH - "How Our Built Environments Impact Children's...
 
Retroalimentacion con papas
Retroalimentacion con papasRetroalimentacion con papas
Retroalimentacion con papas
 
Peek asa2019
Peek asa2019Peek asa2019
Peek asa2019
 
1Standards & Electrical Safety OverviewApplicable Sta.docx
1Standards & Electrical Safety OverviewApplicable Sta.docx1Standards & Electrical Safety OverviewApplicable Sta.docx
1Standards & Electrical Safety OverviewApplicable Sta.docx
 
215548180 Thiswana ass1.docx
215548180 Thiswana ass1.docx215548180 Thiswana ass1.docx
215548180 Thiswana ass1.docx
 
Report
ReportReport
Report
 
Child car seat rules mostly ignored, study finds
Child car seat rules mostly ignored, study findsChild car seat rules mostly ignored, study finds
Child car seat rules mostly ignored, study finds
 
Child car seat rules mostly ignored, study finds
Child car seat rules mostly ignored, study findsChild car seat rules mostly ignored, study finds
Child car seat rules mostly ignored, study finds
 
Car Seat Placement Investigation Training
Car Seat Placement Investigation TrainingCar Seat Placement Investigation Training
Car Seat Placement Investigation Training
 
Teen Driving final
Teen Driving finalTeen Driving final
Teen Driving final
 
Rear Facing Car Seat Invesigation
Rear Facing Car Seat InvesigationRear Facing Car Seat Invesigation
Rear Facing Car Seat Invesigation
 
Saferoutestoschool
SaferoutestoschoolSaferoutestoschool
Saferoutestoschool
 
TEENTRAKKER Presentation
TEENTRAKKER PresentationTEENTRAKKER Presentation
TEENTRAKKER Presentation
 
WSB Evaluation Results
WSB Evaluation ResultsWSB Evaluation Results
WSB Evaluation Results
 
Ijpsr14 05-11-015
Ijpsr14 05-11-015Ijpsr14 05-11-015
Ijpsr14 05-11-015
 
Employment - Sample Writing - Undergraduate Research Study
Employment - Sample Writing - Undergraduate Research StudyEmployment - Sample Writing - Undergraduate Research Study
Employment - Sample Writing - Undergraduate Research Study
 
mohave-cyshcn-final
mohave-cyshcn-finalmohave-cyshcn-final
mohave-cyshcn-final
 
Child Restraint with Lifestyle in Thailand: A case study of Khon Kaen Province
Child Restraint with Lifestyle in Thailand: A case study of Khon Kaen ProvinceChild Restraint with Lifestyle in Thailand: A case study of Khon Kaen Province
Child Restraint with Lifestyle in Thailand: A case study of Khon Kaen Province
 
Traffic Safety Culture Indexing: 2015 Texas Survey
Traffic Safety Culture Indexing: 2015 Texas SurveyTraffic Safety Culture Indexing: 2015 Texas Survey
Traffic Safety Culture Indexing: 2015 Texas Survey
 

Recently uploaded

The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13Steve Thomason
 
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionMastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionSafetyChain Software
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactdawncurless
 
mini mental status format.docx
mini    mental       status     format.docxmini    mental       status     format.docx
mini mental status format.docxPoojaSen20
 
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)eniolaolutunde
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingTechSoup
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityGeoBlogs
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxheathfieldcps1
 
PSYCHIATRIC History collection FORMAT.pptx
PSYCHIATRIC   History collection FORMAT.pptxPSYCHIATRIC   History collection FORMAT.pptx
PSYCHIATRIC History collection FORMAT.pptxPoojaSen20
 
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfArihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfchloefrazer622
 
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdfssuser54595a
 
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxHow to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxmanuelaromero2013
 
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptxContemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptxRoyAbrique
 
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991RKavithamani
 
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher EducationIntroduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Educationpboyjonauth
 
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfSoniaTolstoy
 
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesSeparation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesFatimaKhan178732
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfsanyamsingh5019
 

Recently uploaded (20)

The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
 
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionMastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
 
mini mental status format.docx
mini    mental       status     format.docxmini    mental       status     format.docx
mini mental status format.docx
 
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
 
PSYCHIATRIC History collection FORMAT.pptx
PSYCHIATRIC   History collection FORMAT.pptxPSYCHIATRIC   History collection FORMAT.pptx
PSYCHIATRIC History collection FORMAT.pptx
 
Staff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSD
Staff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSDStaff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSD
Staff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSD
 
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfArihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
 
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
 
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxHow to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
 
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptxContemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
 
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
 
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher EducationIntroduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
 
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
 
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesSeparation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
 

MS Restraint Survey Results

  • 1. UNDER 1 year Rear-facing car seat ages 1 to 3 Rear-facing car seat until seat is outgrown, then forward-facing seat with harness MISSISSIPPI CHILD RESTRAINT laws UNDER FOUR YEARS Child restraint device or system. ages 4 to 6 Under 4’9” tall and weigh less than 65 lbs- booster seat system national recommendations for child passenger safety To evaluate the effectiveness of Mississippi’s child restraint programs, observational surveys are conducted annually in cities throughout the state. The surveys and data analysis provide a basis for conclusions about the usage of child restraints in Mississippi. Child restraint use in Mississippi was found to be 81.1% for the year 2014. This rate reflects a decrease of 2.6% from last year’s finding (83.7% in 2013). In comparison to other states, child restraint use in Mississippi continues to lag behind the norm. The most current figures from the National Occupant Protection Use Survey (NOPUS) indicate the national average of child restraint use for children under age 8 in 2013 as 89%. child restraint use in mississippi ages 4 to 7 Forward-facing seat until seat is outgrown, then booster seat. ages 8 to 12 Booster seat until Child is big enough to be properly restrained by vehicle seat belt alone (Occupant Restraint Use in 2013: Results From the National Occupant Protection Use Survey Controlled Intersection Study DOT HS 812 080, January 2015). Prepared for: Mississippi Governor’s Office of Highway Safety Division of Public Safety Planning Mississippi Department of Public Safety Prepared by: J. W. Landrum Observational Survey Laboratory David R. Parrish, Drew Morgan, and Daniel Suddoth MISSISSIPPI CHILD RESTRAINT SURVEY 2 0 1 4
  • 2. restraint usages of children and adults In the 2014 Mississippi child restraint study, there were 5,885 vehicles observed in 40 municipalities during the survey period from March to June. These cars contained a total of 7,619 children estimated to be under the age of 7. A complete analysis of the data resulted in a 2014 overall calculated child restraint usage rate of 81.1% for Mississippi. Table 1: Child Restraint Used by Type of Location Type of Location Using Restraints Children Observed Percent Using Restraints (%) 1. Fast Food 883 1088 81.2 % 2. Large Shopping Mall 138 158 87.3% 3. Grocery Store 393 493 79.7% 4. Daycare or Child Learning Center 1415 1841 76.9% 5. Health Dept. or Human Resources 346 410 84.4% 6. Medical Care Complex 314 370 84.9% 7. Playground, Park, Museum or Zoo 129 143 90.2% 8. Small Shopping Center or Walmart 931 1186 78.5% 9. Discount or Dollar Store 232 285 81.4% 10. Street Intersection 952 1149 82.9% 11. Church or Church Nursery 387 418 90.4% 12. Service Station 37 45 82.2% 13. Restaurant 24 25 96.0% 14. Post Office 3 3 100% 15. Bank 4 5 80.0% Totals 6179 7619 81.1% Table 1 provides information on the type of location, the number of children observed, and whether or not they were restrained. It should be noted that none of the locations are definitive of child restraint use at that type of location, but only provide some indication of the level of restraint use. Gender Using Seat Belt Total Number of Observations Percent Using Seat Belts (%) Male 1197 1170 67.6% Female 2864 4035 71.0% Totals 4061 5805 70.0% Table 2: Seat Belt Usage Status for Drivers In Table 2, the percentage of drivers using seat belts by gender is presented. Of the drivers observed, 71.0% of the female drivers were belted while 67.6% of the male drivers buckled-up. Overall, 70.0% of the drivers observed were belted. Child restraint use by seating position of child Male drivers were slightly more likely to place a child on the front seat than were female drivers. Children in vehicles driven by male drivers were placed on the front seat of the automobile 24.2% of the time as compared to 20.5% when the driver of the vehicle was female. Children placed on the front seat, as opposed to the back seat, were more likely to be unrestrained regardless of the sex of the driver. Female drivers are slightly more likely to buckle children in the back seat when compared to male drivers. The data suggests about 84.5% of male drivers will utilize some kind of child restraint for backseat children when they are in control of the vehicle, and likewise about 86.3% of female drivers buckle up children in the back when in control of the vehicle. Obviously educational efforts directed at restraining children in motor vehicles and also placing these children on the back seat for safety reasons have had some positive effects in the state of Mississippi. Refer to Table 4 for more details. It is known that the safest place for a child to be restrained, or for that matter to ride unrestrained, is on the back seat (or second row of seats) of a vehicle. It would therefore be expected that adults putting children in the back seat of a vehicle would also have more awareness of the importance of using child restraints. The seating position, as well as the restraint status of the child, was recorded in this survey. As expected, children on the back seat of automobiles were restrained at a higher rate than were those on the front seat. Table 3 shows children in the back seat were restrained at a rate of 85.7% while children on the front seat were restrained at a rate of 65.6%. Table 3: Child Restraint by Position of Child Seating Position of Child Children Restrained Total Number of Children Observed Count Percent (%) Count Percent (%) 1. Front Seat 1076 65.6% 1639 21.6% 2. Back Seat 5087 85.7% 5933 78.4% Totals 6163 81.4% 7572 100% Males Seating Position of Child Children Restrained Total Number of Children Observed Count Percent (%) Count Percent (%) Front 363 65.1% 558 24.2% Back 1473 84.5% 1744 75.8% Totals 1836 79.8% 2302 100% Females Seating Position of Child Child Restrained Total Number of Children Observed Count Percent (%) Count Percent (%) Front 713 66.0% 1081 20.5% Back 3614 86.3% 4189 79.5% Totals 4327 82.1% 5270 100% Table 4: Child Restraint by Position of Child by gender of driver