DISEASE SCREENING
Definition :
The search for unrecognized disease or defect by means of rapidly applied
test examinations or other procedures in apparently healthy individuals.
the annual health examinations were meant for the early detection of
"hidden" disease.
• Screening differs from periodic health examinations
in the following respects :
1) capable of wide application
2) relatively inexpensive
3) requires little physician-time. In fact the physician is not required to
administer the test, but only to interpret it.
*A screening test is not intended to be a diagnostic test. It is only an
initial examination.
• screening test :
Done on apparently healthy
Applied to groups
Test results are arbitrary and final
Based on one criterion or cut-off point
Less accurate
Less expensive
The initiative comes from the investigator or agency providing
care.
Not a basis for treatment
Diagnostic test:
• Done on those with indications or sick.
• Applied to single patients, all diseases are considered.
• Diagnosis is not final but modified in light of new evidence, diagnosis is the
sum of all evidence.
• Based on evaluation of a number of symptoms, signs (e.g., diabetes) and
laboratory findings.
• More accurate.
• More expensive.
• Used as a basis for treatment.
• The initiative comes from a patient with a complaint.
* Aims and objectives :
• to sort out from a large group of apparently healthy persons
those likely to have the disease or at increased risk of the
disease under study.
• To bring those who are "apparently abnormal" under medical
supervision and treatment .
Explanation of terms :
a .Screening:
screening is testing for infection or disease in populations or in
individuals who are not seeking health care; for example,
serological testing for AIDS virus in blood donors, neonatal
screening, premarital screening for syphilis.
b.Case-finding:
This is use of clinical and/or laboratory tests to detect disease in
individuals seeking health care for other reasons .
c. Diagnostic tests :
• Use of clinical and/or laboratory procedures to confirm or
refute the existence of disease or true abnormality in patients
with signs and symptoms presumed to be caused by
the disease; for example,VDRL testing of patients with lesions
suggestive of secondary syphilis; endocervical culture for N.
gonorrhoea
• Uses of screening :
a. Case detection :
• "prescriptive screening". It is defined as the presumptive identification of
unrecognized disease, which does not arise from a patient's request.
• e.g.,
• neonatal screening bacteriuria in pregnancy, breast
cancer, cervical cancer, deafness in children, diabetes
mellitus, iron deficiency anaemia, pulmonary
tuberculosis, haemolytic disease of the newborn
b. Control of disease
• "prospective screening". People are examined for the benefit of
others, e.g., screening of immigrants from infectious diseases
such as tuberculosis and syphilis to protect the home population
c.Research purposes
• For example, there are many chronic diseases whose natural
history is not fully known (e.g., cancer, hypertension). Screening
may aid in obtaining more basic knowledge about the natural
history of such diseases .
d. Educational opportunities :
• screening programmes (as for example, screening for
diabetes) provide opportunities for creating public awareness
and for educating health professionals .
Types of screening :
• Three types of screening have been described:
a. Mass screening
b. High-risk or selective screening
c. Multiphasic screening.
a. Mass screening :
the screening of a whole population or a sub-group,as for
example,all adults It is offered to all irrespective of the
particular risk individual
b.High-risk or selective screening :
• Screening will be most productive if applied selectively to
high-risk groups, the groups defined on the basis of
epidemiological research
c. screening multiphasic :
the application of two or more screening tests in combination
to a large number of people at one time than to carry out
separate screening tests for single diseases.The procedure
may also include a health questionnaire, clinical examination
and a range of measurements and investigations .
CRITERIA FOR SCREENING
• The criteria for screening are based on two considerations ;
the DISEASE to be screened, and the TEST to be applied .
:
disease :
The disease to be screened should fulfil the following criteria before it is
considered suitable for screening:
1. the condition sought should be an important health problem (in general,
prevalence should be high);
2. there should be a recognizable latent or early asymptomatic stage
3. the natural history of the condition, including development from latent to
declared disease, should be adequately understood (so that we can know
at what stage the process ceases to be reversible);
4. there is a test that can detect the disease prior to the onset of
signs and symptoms.
5. facilities should be available for confirmation of the
diagnosis.
6. there is an effective treatment.
7. there should be an agreed-on policy concerning whom to
treat as patients (e.g., lower ranges of blood pressure; border-
line diabetes).
8. there is good evidence that early detection and treatment
reduces morbidity and mortality;
9. the expected benefits (e.g., the number of lives saved) of
early detection exceed the risks and costs.
Screening test
• The test must satisfy the criteria of acceptability, repeatability and
validity, besides others such as yield,simplicity, safety, rapidity, ease of
administration and cost.
1.Acceptability:
the test should be acceptable to the people at whom it is aimed. In
general, tests that are painful, discomforting or embarrassing (e.g.,
rectal or vaginal examinations) are not likely to be acceptable to the
population in mass campaigns .
2.Repeatability :
That is, the test must give consistent results when repeated
more than once on the same individual or material, under the
same conditions.
The repeatability of the test depends upon three major factors,
namely observer variation, biological (or subject) variation
and errors relating to technical methods.
a. observer variation :
Two types :
1 _Intra observer variation :
This is variation between repeated observations by the same
observer on the same subject or material at the same time.
Intra-observer variation may often be minimized by taking the
average of several replicate measurements at the same time.
2_ Inter-observer variation :
This is variation between different observer on the same
subject or material .
• Observer errors can be minimized by : standardization of
procedures for obtaining
measurements and classifications ,intensive training of all the
observers and making use of two or more observers for
independent assessment.
B. Biological (subject) variation :
*Changes in the parameters observed.
*Variations in the way patients perceive their symptoms and
answer .
* Regression to the mean .
c .Errors relating to technical methods :
repeatability may be affected by variations inherent in the
method, e.g., defective instruments
3.Validity (accuracy) :
• refers to what extent the test accurately measures which it
purports to measure ; In other words, validity expresses the
ability of a test to separate or distinguish those who have the
disease from those who do not.
• Validity has two components - sensitivity and specificity. Both
measurements are expressed as percentages.
Sensitivity and specificity are usually determined by applying
the test to one group of persons having the disease, and to a
reference group not having the disease .
Screening test result diagnosis
Diseased Not diseased Total
Postive a( true
postive)
b( false
postive)
a+b
Negative C(false
negative )
d (true
negative )
c+d
Total a+c b+d a+b+c+d
• Evaluation of a screening test :
The following measures are used to evaluate a screening test:
• (a) Sensitivity = a/ (a + c) x 100
• (b) Specificity = d/(b + d) x 100
• (c) Predictive value of a positive test = a/(a + b) x 100
• (d) Predictive value of a negative test = d/(c + d) x 100
• (e) Percentage of false-negatives = c/(a + c) x 100
• (f) Percentage of false-positive = b/(b + d) x 100
* Senstivity :
It has been defined as the ability of a test to identify correctly
all those who have the disease, that is "true-positive“
* Specificity :
It is defined as the ability of a test to identify correctly those
who do not have the disease .
.
* Predictive accuracy :
which reflects the diagnostic power of the test The predictive
accuracy depends upon sensitivity, specificity and disease
prevalence.
The "predictive value of a positive test" indicates the
probability that a patient with a positive test result has, in fact,
the disease in question.
• False negatives and postives:
"false-negative" means that patients who actually have the
disease are told that they do not have the disease.
"false-positive" means that patients who do not have the disease
are told that they have the disease.
• Evaluation of screening programmes :
By :
(1) Randomized controlled trials: Ideally evaluation should be done by a
randomized controlled trial in which one group (randomly selected)
receives the screening test, and a control which receives no such test .
• (2) Uncontrolled trials: Sometimes, uncontrolled trials are used to see if
people with disease detected through screening appear to live longer
after diagnosis and treatment than patients who were not screened.
(3) Other methods:
There are also other methods of evaluation such as case
control studies and comparison in trends between areas with
different degrees of screening coverage.Thus it can be
determined whether intervention by screening is any better
than the conventional method of managing the disease.

screening test in epidemiology and primary health care .pptx

  • 1.
    DISEASE SCREENING Definition : Thesearch for unrecognized disease or defect by means of rapidly applied test examinations or other procedures in apparently healthy individuals. the annual health examinations were meant for the early detection of "hidden" disease. • Screening differs from periodic health examinations in the following respects : 1) capable of wide application 2) relatively inexpensive
  • 2.
    3) requires littlephysician-time. In fact the physician is not required to administer the test, but only to interpret it. *A screening test is not intended to be a diagnostic test. It is only an initial examination.
  • 3.
    • screening test: Done on apparently healthy Applied to groups Test results are arbitrary and final Based on one criterion or cut-off point Less accurate Less expensive The initiative comes from the investigator or agency providing care. Not a basis for treatment
  • 4.
    Diagnostic test: • Doneon those with indications or sick. • Applied to single patients, all diseases are considered. • Diagnosis is not final but modified in light of new evidence, diagnosis is the sum of all evidence. • Based on evaluation of a number of symptoms, signs (e.g., diabetes) and laboratory findings. • More accurate. • More expensive. • Used as a basis for treatment. • The initiative comes from a patient with a complaint.
  • 5.
    * Aims andobjectives : • to sort out from a large group of apparently healthy persons those likely to have the disease or at increased risk of the disease under study. • To bring those who are "apparently abnormal" under medical supervision and treatment .
  • 6.
    Explanation of terms: a .Screening: screening is testing for infection or disease in populations or in individuals who are not seeking health care; for example, serological testing for AIDS virus in blood donors, neonatal screening, premarital screening for syphilis. b.Case-finding: This is use of clinical and/or laboratory tests to detect disease in individuals seeking health care for other reasons .
  • 7.
    c. Diagnostic tests: • Use of clinical and/or laboratory procedures to confirm or refute the existence of disease or true abnormality in patients with signs and symptoms presumed to be caused by the disease; for example,VDRL testing of patients with lesions suggestive of secondary syphilis; endocervical culture for N. gonorrhoea
  • 8.
    • Uses ofscreening : a. Case detection : • "prescriptive screening". It is defined as the presumptive identification of unrecognized disease, which does not arise from a patient's request. • e.g., • neonatal screening bacteriuria in pregnancy, breast cancer, cervical cancer, deafness in children, diabetes mellitus, iron deficiency anaemia, pulmonary tuberculosis, haemolytic disease of the newborn
  • 9.
    b. Control ofdisease • "prospective screening". People are examined for the benefit of others, e.g., screening of immigrants from infectious diseases such as tuberculosis and syphilis to protect the home population c.Research purposes • For example, there are many chronic diseases whose natural history is not fully known (e.g., cancer, hypertension). Screening may aid in obtaining more basic knowledge about the natural history of such diseases .
  • 10.
    d. Educational opportunities: • screening programmes (as for example, screening for diabetes) provide opportunities for creating public awareness and for educating health professionals .
  • 11.
    Types of screening: • Three types of screening have been described: a. Mass screening b. High-risk or selective screening c. Multiphasic screening.
  • 12.
    a. Mass screening: the screening of a whole population or a sub-group,as for example,all adults It is offered to all irrespective of the particular risk individual b.High-risk or selective screening : • Screening will be most productive if applied selectively to high-risk groups, the groups defined on the basis of epidemiological research
  • 13.
    c. screening multiphasic: the application of two or more screening tests in combination to a large number of people at one time than to carry out separate screening tests for single diseases.The procedure may also include a health questionnaire, clinical examination and a range of measurements and investigations .
  • 14.
    CRITERIA FOR SCREENING •The criteria for screening are based on two considerations ; the DISEASE to be screened, and the TEST to be applied . :
  • 15.
    disease : The diseaseto be screened should fulfil the following criteria before it is considered suitable for screening: 1. the condition sought should be an important health problem (in general, prevalence should be high); 2. there should be a recognizable latent or early asymptomatic stage 3. the natural history of the condition, including development from latent to declared disease, should be adequately understood (so that we can know at what stage the process ceases to be reversible);
  • 16.
    4. there isa test that can detect the disease prior to the onset of signs and symptoms. 5. facilities should be available for confirmation of the diagnosis. 6. there is an effective treatment. 7. there should be an agreed-on policy concerning whom to treat as patients (e.g., lower ranges of blood pressure; border- line diabetes).
  • 17.
    8. there isgood evidence that early detection and treatment reduces morbidity and mortality; 9. the expected benefits (e.g., the number of lives saved) of early detection exceed the risks and costs.
  • 18.
    Screening test • Thetest must satisfy the criteria of acceptability, repeatability and validity, besides others such as yield,simplicity, safety, rapidity, ease of administration and cost. 1.Acceptability: the test should be acceptable to the people at whom it is aimed. In general, tests that are painful, discomforting or embarrassing (e.g., rectal or vaginal examinations) are not likely to be acceptable to the population in mass campaigns .
  • 19.
    2.Repeatability : That is,the test must give consistent results when repeated more than once on the same individual or material, under the same conditions. The repeatability of the test depends upon three major factors, namely observer variation, biological (or subject) variation and errors relating to technical methods.
  • 20.
    a. observer variation: Two types : 1 _Intra observer variation : This is variation between repeated observations by the same observer on the same subject or material at the same time. Intra-observer variation may often be minimized by taking the average of several replicate measurements at the same time.
  • 21.
    2_ Inter-observer variation: This is variation between different observer on the same subject or material . • Observer errors can be minimized by : standardization of procedures for obtaining measurements and classifications ,intensive training of all the observers and making use of two or more observers for independent assessment.
  • 22.
    B. Biological (subject)variation : *Changes in the parameters observed. *Variations in the way patients perceive their symptoms and answer . * Regression to the mean . c .Errors relating to technical methods : repeatability may be affected by variations inherent in the method, e.g., defective instruments
  • 23.
    3.Validity (accuracy) : •refers to what extent the test accurately measures which it purports to measure ; In other words, validity expresses the ability of a test to separate or distinguish those who have the disease from those who do not. • Validity has two components - sensitivity and specificity. Both measurements are expressed as percentages.
  • 24.
    Sensitivity and specificityare usually determined by applying the test to one group of persons having the disease, and to a reference group not having the disease .
  • 25.
    Screening test resultdiagnosis Diseased Not diseased Total Postive a( true postive) b( false postive) a+b Negative C(false negative ) d (true negative ) c+d Total a+c b+d a+b+c+d
  • 26.
    • Evaluation ofa screening test : The following measures are used to evaluate a screening test: • (a) Sensitivity = a/ (a + c) x 100 • (b) Specificity = d/(b + d) x 100 • (c) Predictive value of a positive test = a/(a + b) x 100 • (d) Predictive value of a negative test = d/(c + d) x 100 • (e) Percentage of false-negatives = c/(a + c) x 100 • (f) Percentage of false-positive = b/(b + d) x 100
  • 27.
    * Senstivity : Ithas been defined as the ability of a test to identify correctly all those who have the disease, that is "true-positive“ * Specificity : It is defined as the ability of a test to identify correctly those who do not have the disease . .
  • 28.
    * Predictive accuracy: which reflects the diagnostic power of the test The predictive accuracy depends upon sensitivity, specificity and disease prevalence. The "predictive value of a positive test" indicates the probability that a patient with a positive test result has, in fact, the disease in question.
  • 29.
    • False negativesand postives: "false-negative" means that patients who actually have the disease are told that they do not have the disease. "false-positive" means that patients who do not have the disease are told that they have the disease.
  • 30.
    • Evaluation ofscreening programmes : By : (1) Randomized controlled trials: Ideally evaluation should be done by a randomized controlled trial in which one group (randomly selected) receives the screening test, and a control which receives no such test . • (2) Uncontrolled trials: Sometimes, uncontrolled trials are used to see if people with disease detected through screening appear to live longer after diagnosis and treatment than patients who were not screened.
  • 31.
    (3) Other methods: Thereare also other methods of evaluation such as case control studies and comparison in trends between areas with different degrees of screening coverage.Thus it can be determined whether intervention by screening is any better than the conventional method of managing the disease.