Presentation give at AMEE 2008

1. Scenarios for the implementation of VPs into the medical curriculum by the example of JUMC's participation in the eViP-Programme A . J. Stachoń, A . A. Kononowicz, I . Roterman-Konieczna Department of Bioinformatics and Telemedicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland I. Hege, M . Holzer, M . R. Fischer Medical Education Unit, Medizinische Klinik-Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, München, Germany M . Adler Instruct AG, München, Germany

5. Examples of media adaptation activities Adding subtitles Localization (medical documentation)

7. Repurposing time effort

8. UJ’s VP scenarios realized in the first year of the eViP project creation of Flash animation VP content Enrichment E-learning 4th 27 Applied Computer Science Students (supervised by medical experts) creation of 14 new VPs l earning-by- teaching Computer Science post-graduate 4 8 Medical PhD 2 eViP cases in English self-study Basis of Computer Science 1st 68 Medical Foreign Students 2 eViP cases in Polish self-study Medical informatics and statistics 2 3rd 7 6 Dentistry Polish Students 2 eViP cases in Polish self-study Telemedicine 2 3rd 231 Medical Polish S tudents (Pilot Study) Material/ Virtual Patients Scenario of implementation Class Year of Study Numer of Students Group of Students

9. Surveys in the project’s first year - results Q3 – Was the presented clinical case interesting for you? Q4 – Would you like to have VPs implemented to your medical study? 3,8 4,4 - Q4 3,9 4,4 4,2 Likert Scale 1 - 5 Q3 7,4 7,3 60 % self study 56 % classes 16 % revision 48% assessment self-study 25 Medical Foreign Students 8,0 8,2 81% self study 60% classes 72% revision 48% assessment self-study 56 Dentistry Polish Students 7,4 7,8 75% self study 52% classes 65% revision 29% assessment self-study 134 Medical Polish Students (Pilot Study) Scale 1 - 10 VP’s mark Students preferences Scenario of implementation N Group of Students

12. 1 st International Conference on Virtual Patients

13. Surveys in the project’s first year - results Q3 – Was the presented clinical case interesting for you? Q4 – Would you like to have VPs implemented to your medical study? Q6 – Was the content of the VP understandable? Q7 – Was the content of the VP logically structured? Q8 – Did the presented case contain useful knowledge? Q9 – Do you believe that learning using virtual patients is more efficient than conventional methods? Q11 – Was the language of the VP appropriate? Q12 – Was the VP system (CASUS) easy to operate? 7,4 7,3 60 % self study 56 % classes 16 % revision 48% assessment 3,9 - 3,6 3,9 3,8 - 3,8 3,9 self-study 25 Medical Foreign Students 8,0 8,2 81% self study 60% classes 72% revision 48% assessment 4,6 4,3 3,9 4,4 4,6 4,3 4,4 4,4 self-study 56 Dentistry Polish Students 7,4 7,8 75% self study 52% classes 65% revision 29% assessment 4,6 4,3 3,9 4,1 4,2 4,2 - 4,2 self-study 134 Medical Polish Students (Pilot Study) Scale 1 - 10 Likert Scale 1 - 5 VP’s mark Students preferences Q12 Q11 Q9 Q8 Q7 Q6 Q4 Q3 Scenario of implementation N Group of Students

16. VP Content Enrichment Student’s projects