The document summarizes the Joint Commission's tissue standards for accredited healthcare organizations. It explains that the standards were added due to concerns about tissue-borne infections. The standards require standardized procedures for acquiring, receiving, storing and issuing tissues. Organizations must also maintain bi-directional traceability of tissues and have systems in place to investigate any adverse events.
Periodic Safety Update Reports: Some commonly asked questionsTGA Australia
This document discusses periodic safety update reports (PSURs), which are required to be submitted regularly to regulatory agencies to evaluate the benefit-risk profile of medicines on the market. It provides answers to commonly asked questions about PSUR requirements, timing of submissions, and what the regulatory agency does with the submitted reports. Key points covered include that PSURs are due annually for 3 years from approval, have a 90 day submission window after the data lock point, and are reviewed for safety changes, new signals, and significant new safety information. Contact information is provided for questions.
Epidemiological situations: Compliance to Therapeutic Goods Order TGA Australia
Managing epidemiological situations in accordance with Therapeutic Goods Order No. 88 - Standards for donor selection, testing and minimising infectious disease transmission via therapeutic goods that are human blood and blood components, human tissues and human cellular therapy products, Table 1 (s). The Zika virus outbreak is provided as an example.
The aim of Safety reports is describe the safety during the lifecycle of the medicinal product. These reports are necessary during development as well as during the authorization process or renewal. In addition, several of these reports may be required by Health Authorities in case of safety concerns.
This presentation contains a full overview about periodic safety update reports and all the information related with it.
The document provides an agenda for the Rephine Symposium 2018 on Good Distribution Practices. The morning session includes presentations on updates from Rephine, the GDP regulatory framework, and regulatory inspections. The afternoon includes a presentation on auditing of intermediates and an open discussion on audit case studies. A brief history of Rephine is given showing its expansion from consultancy to include regulatory affairs, clinical practice, and sourcing services. The document outlines Rephine's services in GMP, GDP, clinical practice, and sourcing.
The document discusses the role of the EU Qualified Person for Pharmacovigilance (QPPV). The QPPV must be appropriately qualified, reside in the EEA, and act as a single point of contact for drug safety issues in Europe. The QPPV is responsible for establishing and maintaining the company's pharmacovigilance system, monitoring product safety, submitting regulatory documents, and ensuring compliance with European legislation on safety reporting and risk management. Both the marketing authorization holder and QPPV have overlapping obligations to support pharmacovigilance activities and ensure the safe use of medicinal products in the EU.
The document discusses different procedures for obtaining marketing authorization for medicinal products in the European Union. It describes the national authorization procedure which allows approval in a single member state, as well as the centralized procedure which provides an authorization that applies across all EU states. It also outlines the mutual recognition and decentralized procedures, which allow authorization in multiple states via coordination between countries. Key steps, timelines and responsibilities of each process are defined in detail.
The Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT) is responsible for assessing advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) at the European Medicines Agency. The CAT evaluates gene therapy, cell therapy, and tissue-engineered products. It provides scientific advice, classification, certification, and evaluation of marketing authorization applications for ATMPs. Patients' and healthcare professionals' organizations are represented within the CAT to provide perspectives on regulatory processes and product development for ATMPs.
Periodic Safety Update Reports: Some commonly asked questionsTGA Australia
This document discusses periodic safety update reports (PSURs), which are required to be submitted regularly to regulatory agencies to evaluate the benefit-risk profile of medicines on the market. It provides answers to commonly asked questions about PSUR requirements, timing of submissions, and what the regulatory agency does with the submitted reports. Key points covered include that PSURs are due annually for 3 years from approval, have a 90 day submission window after the data lock point, and are reviewed for safety changes, new signals, and significant new safety information. Contact information is provided for questions.
Epidemiological situations: Compliance to Therapeutic Goods Order TGA Australia
Managing epidemiological situations in accordance with Therapeutic Goods Order No. 88 - Standards for donor selection, testing and minimising infectious disease transmission via therapeutic goods that are human blood and blood components, human tissues and human cellular therapy products, Table 1 (s). The Zika virus outbreak is provided as an example.
The aim of Safety reports is describe the safety during the lifecycle of the medicinal product. These reports are necessary during development as well as during the authorization process or renewal. In addition, several of these reports may be required by Health Authorities in case of safety concerns.
This presentation contains a full overview about periodic safety update reports and all the information related with it.
The document provides an agenda for the Rephine Symposium 2018 on Good Distribution Practices. The morning session includes presentations on updates from Rephine, the GDP regulatory framework, and regulatory inspections. The afternoon includes a presentation on auditing of intermediates and an open discussion on audit case studies. A brief history of Rephine is given showing its expansion from consultancy to include regulatory affairs, clinical practice, and sourcing services. The document outlines Rephine's services in GMP, GDP, clinical practice, and sourcing.
The document discusses the role of the EU Qualified Person for Pharmacovigilance (QPPV). The QPPV must be appropriately qualified, reside in the EEA, and act as a single point of contact for drug safety issues in Europe. The QPPV is responsible for establishing and maintaining the company's pharmacovigilance system, monitoring product safety, submitting regulatory documents, and ensuring compliance with European legislation on safety reporting and risk management. Both the marketing authorization holder and QPPV have overlapping obligations to support pharmacovigilance activities and ensure the safe use of medicinal products in the EU.
The document discusses different procedures for obtaining marketing authorization for medicinal products in the European Union. It describes the national authorization procedure which allows approval in a single member state, as well as the centralized procedure which provides an authorization that applies across all EU states. It also outlines the mutual recognition and decentralized procedures, which allow authorization in multiple states via coordination between countries. Key steps, timelines and responsibilities of each process are defined in detail.
The Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT) is responsible for assessing advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) at the European Medicines Agency. The CAT evaluates gene therapy, cell therapy, and tissue-engineered products. It provides scientific advice, classification, certification, and evaluation of marketing authorization applications for ATMPs. Patients' and healthcare professionals' organizations are represented within the CAT to provide perspectives on regulatory processes and product development for ATMPs.
Diego Ardigó presented on gene and advanced therapies currently on the market. He discussed the evolution of the regulatory framework for advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) in Europe and the United States. ATMPs include cell-based therapies, tissue engineered products, and gene therapies. Developing ATMPs presents significant complexity compared to small molecule drugs due to issues around manufacturing viable cell-based products, process reproducibility, and managing clinical risks. Currently, only a handful of ATMPs have received approval in Europe, including the first gene therapy Glybera and the first stem cell therapy Holoclar.
PV modules are documents that specify requirements for pharmacovigilance (PV) in the European Union. They cover PV systems, quality systems, inspections, audits, risk management, adverse reaction reporting and management, and periodic safety update reports. Companies with marketing authorization in the EU must comply with these modules to maintain their authorization and avoid financial penalties for noncompliance. The modules are continuously updated to improve patient safety monitoring of medical products in the EU.
The document provides information on periodic safety update reports (PSURs), including:
- PSURs are intended to evaluate the risk-benefit balance of a drug based on new or changing information during the post-approval phase.
- The objectives of a PSUR are to examine if new safety information aligns with previous knowledge, summarize relevant new safety data that could impact risk-benefit analysis, and provide an integrated risk-benefit evaluation.
- Guidelines for PSURs are provided in the ICH E2C guideline and EU's GVP Module VII, with the format and content changing to focus more on risk-benefit analyses and summary tables rather than individual case reports.
The document discusses the changes to the format and content of the Periodic Safety Update Report (PSUR) according to the 2012 EU pharmacovigilance legislation and guidelines. Key changes include a new emphasis on evaluating the risk-benefit balance rather than individual case reports. The PSUR format is now modular to allow information to be shared across documents like the Development Safety Update Report and Risk Management Plan. Detailed case listings are replaced by concise summaries, and multiple interim reports are no longer accepted. The submission timelines for PSURs were also amended according to the new guidelines.
Marketing authorization procedures in euRajaniKarpur
There are three main procedures for obtaining marketing authorization in the EU:
1. Centralized Procedure allows applicants to obtain approval in all EU countries by applying to the EMEA and results in a binding Commission decision. It is mandatory for certain product types.
2. Mutual Recognition Procedure involves approval in multiple countries based on recognition of an existing national authorization. Applications are made to both a Reference and Concerned Member States.
3. Decentralized Procedure is similar but applies to products without prior EU authorization. Applications are made simultaneously to a Reference and Concerned Member States.
General principles of Periodic Safety Update Reports(PSUR)Psur by Julia Appel...László Árvai
The views and opinions expressed in the following PowerPoint slides are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to Bluefish Pharmaceuticals.
Regulation of auotologous cell and tissue therapies in AustraliaTGA Australia
The document summarizes the regulation of autologous cell and tissue therapies in Australia. It discusses the current regulatory framework, public consultation on autologous stem cell therapies, and next steps. Key points include that autologous stem cell therapies are currently excluded from regulation but there are concerns about insufficient oversight and reporting of adverse events, and the consultation sought views on increasing regulatory controls over these therapies.
Online Clinical Trial Notification (CTN)TGA Australia
1) The document provides an overview of the migration of clinical trial notifications from a paper-based system to an online system through the TGA Business Services (TBS) portal. It discusses the data migration process including re-formatting paper data and posting it to the online system.
2) It addresses frequently asked questions about clinical trials, such as when completion advice should be submitted and labeling requirements.
3) Details are given about paying clinical trial notification fees online through the TBS finance portal or by other means like credit card, and the information that needs to be included for payments. The presentation aims to explain the changes and seek comments on improving the online clinical trial notification system.
TGA Presentation: TGA focus and wrap up - What we've done, and what we still ...TGA Australia
An overview of the TGA's implementation of the recommendations made in the Review of Medicines and Medical Devices Regulation and other reforms for the IVD framework
IPO Fast Forward 2013: Medical Apps Event @ Maidstone & Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust. UK Medical Device regulator presentation from Rob Higgins, MHRA.gov.uk (Reproduced with permission)
Development safety update report (dsur) pharmacovigilance and safetyAzierta
According to ICH guideline E2F (Step 5) on Development Safety Update Reports (DSURs) already implemented since 2011, companies must submit DSURs on a yearly basis for medicinal products involved in clinical trials. The focus of the DSUR is on data and findings from clinical trials of drugs and biologicals, whether they are authorized or not.
DSURs are internationally-harmonized, safety documents covering the safety summary of medicinal products during their development or clinical trial phase.
They are based heavily on the PSUR format already used for updating the safety record of drugs in their marketing phase.
A DSUR should be prepared after the first authorization of a clinical trial worldwide. A copy of the DSUR should be submitted to each concerned European Member State (MS) if a clinical trial is authorized in this MS for this investigational drug (still using the DIBD). Therefore, the first DSUR can be submitted to a concerned MS earlier than 1 year, but the covered reporting period should not be longer than 1 year.
The DSUR presents an annual review & evaluation of safety information:
• Information reported during the current review period and analysis based on previous knowledge of the products’ safety
• Description of new issues that may impact the overall program or specific clinical trials.
• Summarization of current understanding and management of known and potential safety risks to exposed patients.
• Provide an update on the status of the clinical development program.
In Azierta, scientific and healthcare consulting, we are experts in Pharmacovigilance and we have a team of highly qualified drug safety experts who support our clients to manage pharmacovigilance in an optimal way. Our work covers all areas of pharmacovigilance, both at the level of medicines, as well as medical devices and cosmetic products.
If you are interested in the contents of the good practices of pharmacovigilance (GVPs), as well as in other products related to pharmacovigilance visit our safety reports website for more details and feel free to contact us, we will be pleased to help you.
2007-05-18 :The Role, Position and Funding of Laboratory Diagnostics in the G...schlieper
The Role, Position and Funding of Laboratory Diagnostics in the German Health Care System
Warsaw, 18. May 2007
Dr. med. Lothar Krimmel
Bioscientia Institute for Medical Diagnostics
Ingelheim, Germany
This year's highlights and what's ahead for 2017TGA Australia
This presentation provides an update on the new close out process for inspections, the new risk matrix and reinspection frequencies, as well as plans for the Inspections Section for 2017.
Pharmacovigilance - a regulator's perspectiveTGA Australia
The document discusses pharmacovigilance from the perspective of the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) in Australia. It provides an overview of the TGA's pharmacovigilance activities, including pre-market risk management plans and post-market adverse event reporting and signal detection. It describes how the TGA monitors the safety of medicines throughout their lifecycle to identify new or unknown risks following approval.
Regulatory Reform - Are we heading in the right direction?TGA Australia
The document summarizes updates from the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) regarding regulatory reform efforts. Key points include: 1) TGA is restructuring to improve processes; 2) The government aims to improve innovation through regulatory reform while ensuring safety; and 3) TGA is working to streamline complementary medicine processes, international cooperation, manufacturing standards, and labelling reviews. The assistant secretary notes reforms are improving processes under the existing framework while further changes may come from ongoing reviews.
The document provides an introduction to the Australian Regulatory Guidelines for Biologicals (ARGB). It discusses the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) as the regulator of biologicals, medicines, and medical devices in Australia. Biologicals are classified into four classes based on their level of risk, with Class 1 having the lowest risk and Class 4 the highest. The guidelines describe the regulatory framework and classification system for biologicals in Australia.
Update on new pv legislation plg june2012danisowich
The document provides an overview and update on new European pharmacovigilance legislation coming into effect in July 2012. It discusses timelines for implementation, introduces the new legislation and its aims, outlines Good Pharmacovigilance Practices including 16 new modules, and summarizes some of the key modules covering pharmacovigilance systems, risk management systems, adverse reaction reporting and periodic safety reports.
This document discusses biovigilance, which refers to the science and activities related to monitoring biological products for adverse events and quality issues. It provides definitions for biological products and outlines the regulatory framework in Australia. The responsibilities of sponsors to report adverse events, recalls, and maintain traceability systems are described. Examples of adverse events reported for tissue products are given. The document notes that draft biovigilance guidance has been developed and will undergo public consultation before being finalized.
Regulatory aspect of pharamacutical packgingvineet gupta
There is no doubt that the regulatory climate is getting more restrictive for pharmaceutical products and it is likely that packaging for pharmaceuticals will have more and more constraints placed upon it.
Diego Ardigó presented on gene and advanced therapies currently on the market. He discussed the evolution of the regulatory framework for advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) in Europe and the United States. ATMPs include cell-based therapies, tissue engineered products, and gene therapies. Developing ATMPs presents significant complexity compared to small molecule drugs due to issues around manufacturing viable cell-based products, process reproducibility, and managing clinical risks. Currently, only a handful of ATMPs have received approval in Europe, including the first gene therapy Glybera and the first stem cell therapy Holoclar.
PV modules are documents that specify requirements for pharmacovigilance (PV) in the European Union. They cover PV systems, quality systems, inspections, audits, risk management, adverse reaction reporting and management, and periodic safety update reports. Companies with marketing authorization in the EU must comply with these modules to maintain their authorization and avoid financial penalties for noncompliance. The modules are continuously updated to improve patient safety monitoring of medical products in the EU.
The document provides information on periodic safety update reports (PSURs), including:
- PSURs are intended to evaluate the risk-benefit balance of a drug based on new or changing information during the post-approval phase.
- The objectives of a PSUR are to examine if new safety information aligns with previous knowledge, summarize relevant new safety data that could impact risk-benefit analysis, and provide an integrated risk-benefit evaluation.
- Guidelines for PSURs are provided in the ICH E2C guideline and EU's GVP Module VII, with the format and content changing to focus more on risk-benefit analyses and summary tables rather than individual case reports.
The document discusses the changes to the format and content of the Periodic Safety Update Report (PSUR) according to the 2012 EU pharmacovigilance legislation and guidelines. Key changes include a new emphasis on evaluating the risk-benefit balance rather than individual case reports. The PSUR format is now modular to allow information to be shared across documents like the Development Safety Update Report and Risk Management Plan. Detailed case listings are replaced by concise summaries, and multiple interim reports are no longer accepted. The submission timelines for PSURs were also amended according to the new guidelines.
Marketing authorization procedures in euRajaniKarpur
There are three main procedures for obtaining marketing authorization in the EU:
1. Centralized Procedure allows applicants to obtain approval in all EU countries by applying to the EMEA and results in a binding Commission decision. It is mandatory for certain product types.
2. Mutual Recognition Procedure involves approval in multiple countries based on recognition of an existing national authorization. Applications are made to both a Reference and Concerned Member States.
3. Decentralized Procedure is similar but applies to products without prior EU authorization. Applications are made simultaneously to a Reference and Concerned Member States.
General principles of Periodic Safety Update Reports(PSUR)Psur by Julia Appel...László Árvai
The views and opinions expressed in the following PowerPoint slides are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to Bluefish Pharmaceuticals.
Regulation of auotologous cell and tissue therapies in AustraliaTGA Australia
The document summarizes the regulation of autologous cell and tissue therapies in Australia. It discusses the current regulatory framework, public consultation on autologous stem cell therapies, and next steps. Key points include that autologous stem cell therapies are currently excluded from regulation but there are concerns about insufficient oversight and reporting of adverse events, and the consultation sought views on increasing regulatory controls over these therapies.
Online Clinical Trial Notification (CTN)TGA Australia
1) The document provides an overview of the migration of clinical trial notifications from a paper-based system to an online system through the TGA Business Services (TBS) portal. It discusses the data migration process including re-formatting paper data and posting it to the online system.
2) It addresses frequently asked questions about clinical trials, such as when completion advice should be submitted and labeling requirements.
3) Details are given about paying clinical trial notification fees online through the TBS finance portal or by other means like credit card, and the information that needs to be included for payments. The presentation aims to explain the changes and seek comments on improving the online clinical trial notification system.
TGA Presentation: TGA focus and wrap up - What we've done, and what we still ...TGA Australia
An overview of the TGA's implementation of the recommendations made in the Review of Medicines and Medical Devices Regulation and other reforms for the IVD framework
IPO Fast Forward 2013: Medical Apps Event @ Maidstone & Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust. UK Medical Device regulator presentation from Rob Higgins, MHRA.gov.uk (Reproduced with permission)
Development safety update report (dsur) pharmacovigilance and safetyAzierta
According to ICH guideline E2F (Step 5) on Development Safety Update Reports (DSURs) already implemented since 2011, companies must submit DSURs on a yearly basis for medicinal products involved in clinical trials. The focus of the DSUR is on data and findings from clinical trials of drugs and biologicals, whether they are authorized or not.
DSURs are internationally-harmonized, safety documents covering the safety summary of medicinal products during their development or clinical trial phase.
They are based heavily on the PSUR format already used for updating the safety record of drugs in their marketing phase.
A DSUR should be prepared after the first authorization of a clinical trial worldwide. A copy of the DSUR should be submitted to each concerned European Member State (MS) if a clinical trial is authorized in this MS for this investigational drug (still using the DIBD). Therefore, the first DSUR can be submitted to a concerned MS earlier than 1 year, but the covered reporting period should not be longer than 1 year.
The DSUR presents an annual review & evaluation of safety information:
• Information reported during the current review period and analysis based on previous knowledge of the products’ safety
• Description of new issues that may impact the overall program or specific clinical trials.
• Summarization of current understanding and management of known and potential safety risks to exposed patients.
• Provide an update on the status of the clinical development program.
In Azierta, scientific and healthcare consulting, we are experts in Pharmacovigilance and we have a team of highly qualified drug safety experts who support our clients to manage pharmacovigilance in an optimal way. Our work covers all areas of pharmacovigilance, both at the level of medicines, as well as medical devices and cosmetic products.
If you are interested in the contents of the good practices of pharmacovigilance (GVPs), as well as in other products related to pharmacovigilance visit our safety reports website for more details and feel free to contact us, we will be pleased to help you.
2007-05-18 :The Role, Position and Funding of Laboratory Diagnostics in the G...schlieper
The Role, Position and Funding of Laboratory Diagnostics in the German Health Care System
Warsaw, 18. May 2007
Dr. med. Lothar Krimmel
Bioscientia Institute for Medical Diagnostics
Ingelheim, Germany
This year's highlights and what's ahead for 2017TGA Australia
This presentation provides an update on the new close out process for inspections, the new risk matrix and reinspection frequencies, as well as plans for the Inspections Section for 2017.
Pharmacovigilance - a regulator's perspectiveTGA Australia
The document discusses pharmacovigilance from the perspective of the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) in Australia. It provides an overview of the TGA's pharmacovigilance activities, including pre-market risk management plans and post-market adverse event reporting and signal detection. It describes how the TGA monitors the safety of medicines throughout their lifecycle to identify new or unknown risks following approval.
Regulatory Reform - Are we heading in the right direction?TGA Australia
The document summarizes updates from the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) regarding regulatory reform efforts. Key points include: 1) TGA is restructuring to improve processes; 2) The government aims to improve innovation through regulatory reform while ensuring safety; and 3) TGA is working to streamline complementary medicine processes, international cooperation, manufacturing standards, and labelling reviews. The assistant secretary notes reforms are improving processes under the existing framework while further changes may come from ongoing reviews.
The document provides an introduction to the Australian Regulatory Guidelines for Biologicals (ARGB). It discusses the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) as the regulator of biologicals, medicines, and medical devices in Australia. Biologicals are classified into four classes based on their level of risk, with Class 1 having the lowest risk and Class 4 the highest. The guidelines describe the regulatory framework and classification system for biologicals in Australia.
Update on new pv legislation plg june2012danisowich
The document provides an overview and update on new European pharmacovigilance legislation coming into effect in July 2012. It discusses timelines for implementation, introduces the new legislation and its aims, outlines Good Pharmacovigilance Practices including 16 new modules, and summarizes some of the key modules covering pharmacovigilance systems, risk management systems, adverse reaction reporting and periodic safety reports.
This document discusses biovigilance, which refers to the science and activities related to monitoring biological products for adverse events and quality issues. It provides definitions for biological products and outlines the regulatory framework in Australia. The responsibilities of sponsors to report adverse events, recalls, and maintain traceability systems are described. Examples of adverse events reported for tissue products are given. The document notes that draft biovigilance guidance has been developed and will undergo public consultation before being finalized.
Regulatory aspect of pharamacutical packgingvineet gupta
There is no doubt that the regulatory climate is getting more restrictive for pharmaceutical products and it is likely that packaging for pharmaceuticals will have more and more constraints placed upon it.
The document discusses efforts to harmonize regulations on botanicals between Belgium, France, and Italy. It outlines Belgium's regulatory system for botanicals and the BELFRIT project, which aims to harmonize the evaluation of botanicals in food supplements. The first phase of BELFRIT involved combining lists of authorized plants from the three countries and researching the plants' traditional uses and safety information. This resulted in a harmonized list of over 1,000 plants. Future phases will focus on further integrating the lists into national legislation and improving scientific advice exchange. The project aims to establish a coherent regulatory system across countries based on scientific evidence and traditional knowledge.
CLE Contribution on the Assessment of Innovative Biochemicals in the EU Statu...OECD Environment
The seminar on Problem Formulation for the Risk Assessment of Biopesticides stemmed from a previous CRP-sponsored event on Innovating Microbial Pesticide Testing that identified the need for an overarching guidance document to determine when in vivo tests are necessary. Problem Formulation, a common practice in pesticide risk assessment, was highlighted as a useful approach for addressing uncertainties in data requirements for biopesticides.
The seminar featured presentations from various perspectives, including industry, regulatory bodies, and academia. Topics included the history and principles of Problem Formulation, industry perspectives on Problem Formulation and how it is applied internally for microbial pesticides, regulatory approaches, and specific case studies. The seminar provided an overview of the challenges, considerations, and potential solutions in harmonising Problem Formulation for biopesticide risk assessment. It emphasised the need for collaboration and discussion to develop Problem Formulation guidance for biopesticides.
Ομιλία-Παρουσίαση: Edith Frénoy, Director of Market Access/HTA, European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries Associations (EFPIA)
Τίτλος Ομιλίας: «HTA cooperation in Europe: can it support the Greek debate?»
The document discusses proposed changes to the regulation of biologicals in Australia. It outlines a new classification system with three classes based on risk and level of manipulation. Class 1 would include low risk products regulated through professional standards. Class 2 would include banked tissues and blood regulated through manufacturing standards. Class 3 would include higher risk products like biologics and cell therapies, regulated through standards for safety, quality and efficacy including clinical trials. An Office of Biologicals would be established within the regulatory agency to oversee biological product regulation according to this new framework.
The Biological Standards Commission oversees the production and adoption of the Terrestrial Manual. It establishes approved methods for diagnosing diseases of terrestrial animals and defining quality criteria for biological products like vaccines. The Commission relies on expertise from OIE Reference Laboratories and subject matter experts. It addresses issues like replacing the international bovine tuberculin standard and facilitating virtual biobanking through ad hoc expert groups.
Organization and objectives of ICH, expedited reporting, ICSR, PSURs, post approval expedited reporting, pharmacovigilance Planning, good clinical practices
The document summarizes an FDA presentation on the regulation of cellular, tissue, and gene therapies. It provides an overview of the FDA organization relevant to these therapies. It discusses premarket review pathways, recent guidance documents, current activities around stem cells, gene therapy, and tissue safety, and international engagement efforts towards regulatory harmonization.
TGA Presentation: Biologicals framework updatesTGA Australia
The document summarizes recent changes and proposed updates to Australia's regulatory framework for biological products such as human cells and tissues (biologicals). Key points:
- The biologicals framework regulates cell and tissue therapies and was introduced in 2011. It applies different regulation levels based on product risks.
- Recent approvals include various tissue-based products and cell therapies. Challenges include improving product characterization and developing potency assays.
- Proposed changes include updating guidance documents, expanding expedited pathways similar to the US and EU, and allowing some autologous cell/tissue uses to be exempt from regulation.
- The review aims to facilitate earlier patient access to innovative therapies while maintaining safety, efficacy and
This document discusses biobanks and registries, their value for research, and opportunities for patient involvement. It describes how biobanks store biological samples and associated data to support research. Registries collect standardized clinical data on patient populations over time. Both require governance and quality management. The document presents two cases where patient organizations were involved in biobank and registry co-creation and governance to help advance research.
The document provides guidelines for approval of blood storage centres at First Referral Units (FRUs) in India. Key points:
- FRUs can store up to 2000 units of whole blood or components annually without a license under certain conditions.
- Conditions include having a medical officer, trained technician, adequate space and equipment for proper storage and transportation of blood.
- Blood must be procured from a licensed mother blood bank and tested, and detailed records must be maintained.
- Training of staff is required to ensure proper handling, storage, cross-matching and issue of blood to reduce maternal mortality from lack of blood availability at FRUs.
The document describes the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH), which was established in 1990 to harmonize technical requirements for pharmaceutical product registration among regulators in Europe, Japan and the United States. It aims to reduce duplication in drug development through international guidelines on Good Clinical Practice (GCP), quality, safety and efficacy. The ICH framework includes guidelines, working groups and a secretariat. Its goal is to make safe and effective new drugs available more quickly and economically worldwide while maintaining high regulatory standards.
The regulation of biologicals in AustraliaTGA Australia
View this presentation for information on:
* what biologicals are, including classes and current uses
* the Australian biologicals framework
* new and experimental products
* clinical trials and risk management.
This is a presentation that I developed and gave to the GMP constituency of a medium-sized biopharmaceutical company to satisfy one of the requirements for ongoing cGMP training. I feel that it very well epitomizes one of my central philosophies surrounding GXP and regulatory topic training -- STORYTELLING.
New Product Registration - Key Considerations when Registering New ProductsCovance
The regulation related to the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) was adopted by the EU in 2007 in response to worldwide initiatives to address the impact of chemicals on human health and the environment. REACH requires all manufacturers and importers of chemicals into European markets to assess and manage the risks associated with their substances and products, and register them with the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). To manage this project, ECHA split existing substances into three categories, based on the amount of the substance that is used annually, with different registration deadlines for different tonnages of use.
ICH Guidelines for Pharmacovigilance.pptxsana916816
Serious and unexpected AEs: FDA recommends report to be submitted within 15 days
Follow up - Up to 15 days alert reports should be
submitted within 15 days
This document provides a summary of guidelines for stability testing of biotechnological/biological products. It discusses the need for stringent stability testing programs for these products given their sensitivity to environmental factors. It recommends testing the drug substance and drug product from at least 3 batches that represent the manufacturing scale. A minimum of 6 months of real-time, real-condition stability data should be submitted initially to support the requested storage period. The quality of batches in the stability program should match what was used in clinical studies. Ongoing updates of stability data may be needed during regulatory review.
Health Information Standards - Kevin O'Carrollhealthcareisi
The document discusses several projects of the Health Information Directorate at the Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA) in Ireland, including:
1. The General Practice Messaging Specification (GPMS), which defines a standard for electronic messaging between general practitioners and other healthcare providers.
2. The National Dataset for General Practice Referrals, which defines a standard format for electronic referrals from GPs to hospitals and other care providers.
3. Standards for coding laboratory tests and results, including adopting the Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) system for test coding.