Rubric for Article ReviewAPACover55 point.docx

•Download as DOCX, PDF•

0 likes•2 views

Rubric for Article Review APA Cover 5/5 point Your name and date Header with page number Introductory Paragraph 5/5 points 1. Author’s Thesis Discuss the author’s thesis. Include article and author name in this paragraph. (if more than one article, include them both) 2. The Facts 20/20 points Discuss three important facts the author uses to support thesis. Explain or correlate the facts with facts from course content. Use in text citations from course reading so show connections to this article. Evaluate the resources provided with the article. Are there resources provided with the article? Are they recent? Body- minimum of 4 fully developed paragraphs This should be a bulk of the report. 3. Strengths /weaknesses/discussion to the profession 40/40 points. Describe the strengths of the information presented as it applies to the professions. Critically evaluate the information in the article. 4. Is there bias or faulty reasoning? Evaluate the information for truth. Bring in outside sources to support your analysis and review. What are others saying about the same topic? Do they agree or is there conflicting information. Draw conclusions. You must support claims of both fact and faulty reasoning. Conclusion 5. Conclusions 10/10 points Provide concluding remarks regarding your review/evaluation of the article. 6. APA Format 10/10 points in text # of references Reference page 7. Overall presentation 10/10 points formatting wording person tense Comments/Reasons for Deductions: Total 100/100 PAGE 1 Week 3- Article Review DUE: Feb 23, 2020 11:59 PM Grade Details Grade N/A Gradebook Comments None Assignment Details Open Date Feb 3, 2020 12:05 AM Graded? Yes Points Possible 100.0 Resubmissions Allowed? Yes Remaining Submissions 3 Attachments checked for originality? Yes Top of Form Assignment Instructions Paper - Find two peer reviewed articles in library about ethics in your discipline or ethics in research and discuss the positions of the authors. Assignment Instructions Instructions: Select two appropriate articles for review to complete the assignment. Write a review using the instructions below. This paper should be a minimum of 1000 words. Write in APA format. Include cover page, body with in text citations & reference list. Select two Articles Locate two peer-reviewed article (related to the ethics) published within the last 3 years in a peer-reviewed journal from the online library, then present an assessment comprising of a precise and critical evaluation. Do not summarize the article. First synthesize the position of the authors. Then, evaluate the information presented in the article. Evaluate the information presented in the article for truth. Is there bias or faulty reasoning? You must support claims of both fact and faulty reasoning. What are others are ...

Education

1. Author’s Thesis
Discuss the author’s thesis. Include article and author name
in this paragraph. (if more than one article, include them both)
2. The Facts
20/20 points
Discuss three important facts the author uses to support thesis.
Explain or correlate the facts with facts from course content.
Use in text citations from course reading so show connections
to this article.
Evaluate the resources provided with the article.

Are there resources provided with the article? Are they recent?
Body- minimum of 4 fully developed paragraphs
This should be a bulk of the report.
3. Strengths /weaknesses/discussion to the profession
40/40 points.
Describe the strengths of the information presented as it applies
to the
professions. Critically evaluate the information in the article.
4. Is there bias or faulty reasoning? Evaluate the information
for truth.
Bring in outside sources to support your analysis and review.
What are others saying about the same topic? Do they agree or
is there conflicting information.
Draw conclusions.
You must support claims of both fact and faulty reasoning.
Conclusion
5. Conclusions

10/10 points
Provide concluding remarks regarding your
review/evaluation of the article.
6. APA Format
10/10 points
in text
# of references
Reference page

7. Overall presentation
10/10 points
formatting
wording
person
tense
Comments/Reasons for Deductions:
Total

100/100
PAGE
1
Week 3- Article Review
DUE: Feb 23, 2020 11:59 PM
Grade Details
Grade
N/A
Gradebook Comments
None
Assignment Details
Open Date
Feb 3, 2020 12:05 AM
Graded?
Yes
Points Possible
100.0
Resubmissions Allowed?
Yes
Remaining Submissions
3
Attachments checked for originality?
Yes
Top of Form
Assignment Instructions
Paper - Find two peer reviewed articles in library about ethics
in your discipline or ethics in research and discuss the positions
of the authors.
Assignment Instructions
Instructions: Select two appropriate articles for review to
complete the assignment. Write a review using the instructions
below. This paper should be a minimum of 1000 words. Write
in APA format. Include cover page, body with in text citations

& reference list.
Select two Articles
Locate two peer-reviewed article (related to the ethics)
published within the last 3 years in a peer-reviewed journal
from the online library, then present an assessment comprising
of a precise and critical evaluation. Do not summarize the
article. First synthesize the position of the authors. Then,
evaluate the information presented in the article. Evaluate the
information presented in the article for truth.
Is there bias or faulty reasoning? You must support claims of
both fact and faulty reasoning.
What are others are both author's saying the same topic? Do
they agree or is there conflicting information.
Draw conclusions.
This assignment has many benefits. First, it requires a search of
indexing and abstracting databases from the online library to
find an article that meets the specified criteria (must be related
to ethics). It also emphasizes what a scholarly article is; to
discern between scholarly and non-scholarly writing; to
condense someone else's lengthy argument into a concise report;
to think critically about what has been read by assessing the
strengths and weaknesses of the research; and, thus, to become
participants in the discussions regarding the topic at hand.
FYI: Wikipedia is not an acceptable resource for academic
writing. Please use the university library for reference. Articles
must be peer-reviewed.
View the attachment below to see how points will be allocated
for this assignment.
Bottom of Form

Rubric for Article ReviewAPACover55 point.docx

ENC 1102 Noonan Spring 2018 RESEARCH PAPER PACKET Contents: Assignment Page #s 1. Research Paper Outline2-4 2. Main Article Selection 5 3. Summary of Main Article 6 4. Requirements for Sources 7 5. Research Plan 8 6. Annotated Bibliography 9 7. Quote Sandwich 10 8. Works Cited 11 9. Introduction 12 10. Ethos, Pathos, Logos examples 13 11. Effectiveness discussion 14 12. Conclusions 15 13. Rough Draft directions 15 14. Rough Draft checklist 16 15. Final Paper directions 17-18 16. Final Paper checklist 19 1. Research Paper Outline Use this outline to guide you through the development of your paper. This outline is meant to show the ideal structure of your paper. You do not need to complete this outline as an assignment. I. Introduction a. Hook – Attention Grabber b. Background Information - what is the issue discussed in the main article? Describe at least 2 different positions on the issue (ex: pro and con). c. Why is this topic important for the audience to understand? II. Summary a. Cut and paste the (Main Article) Article Summary you previously submitted; revise as needed III. Analysis: Paragraph 1: Ethos/Pathos/Logos example a. Find one example in your Main Article where the author uses ethos, pathos, or logos to persuade the reader. Give a quote from the main article, cite the quote, then explain how it shows use of ethos, pathos, or logos. Paragraph 2: Point 1, compared to research a. Select first point from main article i. Introduce the point from main article ii. Give quote from main article and in-text citation iii. Explain the quote (What does it mean? How does it fit into rest of your paper?) b. Select correlating point from Source 1 i. Introduce the correlating point from Source 1 ii. Give quote from Source 1 and in-text citation iii. Explain the quote (What does it mean?) iv. Describe how this point relates to Point 1 from the main article- does it support, contradict, or give more info on that point? Paragraph 3: Point 2, compared to research a. Select second point from main article i. Introduce the point from main article ii. Give quote from main article and in-text citation iii. Explain the quote (What does it mean? How does it fit into rest of your paper?) b. Select correlating point from Source 2 i. Introduce the correlating point from Source 2 ii. Give quote from Source 2 and in-text citation iii. Explain the quote (What does it mean?) iv. Describe how this point relates to Point 2 from the main article- does it support, contradict, or give more info on that point? Paragraph 4: Point 3, compared to research a. Select third point from main article i. Introduce the point from main article ii. Give quote from main article and in-text citation iii. Explain the quote (What does it mean? How does it fit into rest of your paper?) b. Select correlating point from Source 3 i. Introduce the point from Source 3 ii. Give quote.

Research and select two professional journal articles that directl.docx

karlhennesey

Research and select two professional journal articles that directly relate to team building or improving team performances. A critical assessment of the articles is expected for this assignment. The articles should be current (less than three years old). In preparation, follow the guidelines established below:  Find two articles that pertain to team building or improving team performance and annotate (in your own words) as you read.  Note the author's main points and thesis statements.  Write a critique encompassing both articles into one document .  Reference both articles in APA format.  The entire document should be typed according to APA style (double-spaced).  The Article Critique should be approximately two to three pages in length.  All journal articles selected should be at least four pages in length.  The Article Critique is due at the completion of Unit VIII. PART I: Introduction Start your critique with sentences giving the following information:  Author's name  Book/Article title and source  Author's thesis statement PART II: Summary  Summarize the author's purpose and main points/evidence cited that are used for back up.  Does the author's use and interpretation of this evidence lead the reader to the same conclusion?  Did the author build a logical argument?  Is there other evidence that would support a counter-argument? PART III: Review and Evaluate To critically review the piece, ask the following questions:  What are the credentials/areas of expertise of the author?  Did the author use appropriate methods to gather the evidence?  Did the author use accurate evidence?  Does the author's use and interpretation of this evidence lead the reader to the same conclusion?  Did the author build a logical argument?  Is there other evidence that would support a counter-argument?  Are the article and the evidence still valid, or are they outdated, leading to an invalid conclusion?  Was the author successful in making his or her point? BSL 4060, Team Building and Leadership 3 PART IV: Conclusion Wrap up:  State whether you agree with the author.  Back up your decisions by stating your reasons.  Give a general opinion of the work. Format your paper using APA style. Use your own words, and include citations and references as needed to avoid plagiarism. .

Required elements for abstract section· One paragraph (not in.docx

sodhi3

Required elements for abstract section: · One paragraph (not indented) · No more than 250 words · States problem/issue · Explains relevance of topic · Addresses method used (“A review of the literature was completed to…” · Included short statement of findings (summary of important aspects of discussion section that relates to your conclusion statement) · Includes short statement of conclusion Required elements for introduction section: · Half a page minimum and no longer than one page. · Introduces topic of the paper. · Briefly describes or defines the topic terminology, if needed · Fully introduces the background of topic and explains why topic is relevant and/or why the literature review is needed. · Includes generalized epidemiology statistics (incidence and prevalence) in this section, if relevant. · Last sentence is thesis or problem statement. (Specific, with one main idea that is developed and proven through the research detailed in paper.) Required elements for Review of Literature section: · 4pages minimum · PRIMARY sources only · Sources are published within the past five years · No Historical references are included in this section · One or less quotation is utilized (FYI: one quote is allowed for competent only NOT exemplary on rubric) · Minimum 2 citations within each paragraph (in other words paragraphs have a two sentence minimum.) · Uses the level two, level three and level four headings, as needed. · Describes what has been written in relation to topic/question(s) · Identifies the central issues of the topic by integrating what previous researchers have found. · Compares results of the studies without drawing conclusions from the comparison. · Does not include opinion-it’s ALL about the literature (sources). Required elements for Methods and Procedures Section: · Topic Selection: describes how topic was chosen. · Resource Search and Selection: Uses provided text updated “values” from author · Libraries/search engines and databases used. · Uses provided text updated “values” from author · Uses at least one database · Search terms. Uses provided text updated “values” from author · Boolean strings. Uses provided text updated “values” from author · Age of the Sources: Uses provided text updated “values” from author Required elements for Discussion Section: · Identifies and acknowledges areas of significant development and of controversy within the literature. · Identifies important issues and formulates questions that need further research and which remain unresolved. · Discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the literature available on your topic. · Expresses opinion and supports it with evidence and examples. · Includes and comment on evidence of literature that contradicts the opinion, if any. Required elements for Conclusion Section: · Restates topic · Restates thesis or problem statement. · Provides a mini-summary of major agreements and disagreements, problems, iss ...

Argument paperEnglish 1 Spring 2014 Argument Assignment Paper.docx

rossskuddershamus

Argument paper/English 1 Spring 2014 Argument Assignment Paper.doc PAGE English 1: Argumentative Essay Assignment The Assignment: Write a six-to-ten page argument paper that addresses a current issue that will address our theme of the impact of technology on communication on ourselves, on our world and on what it means to be human (Barrios, 583). The topic and the issue for this paper is the same as your exploratory paper assignment. The purpose of this paper is to present your position on the issue and then argue why by presenting your own reasons and evidence to support your thesis statement. Locating Sources for Research. The purpose of the exploratory paper was to explore different writers and their position, their perspective, and the types of evidence they used in order to form your own position and perspective. You have three sources that you may use in your paper. For this paper, you must include a variety of sources; they cannot all come from Web sites. Search SMC’s library online catalog, search for a book, search online databases, find newspaper articles, use the search engine Google scholar at www.google.com, or www.yahoo.com . In addition, observations or experience from your personal life are not allowable. Refer to the following handouts: “Research Guide for Papers,” “Sources Acceptable for Academic Papers.” Both of these handouts are on eCompanion. If you include an article from a Website, there must be a date and a sponsor/publisher. If this is not available you cannot use this source. Thesis Statement and Claim: Does your thesis clearly include a claim? Is it arguable? Does it take a perspective on an issue? Is it narrow and specific enough for the length of this assignment? Is it focused on one subject? Is it a claim of policy where you argue that certainpolicies should be changed? Is it a claim of value where you argue that some action, belief, or policy is morally wrong, good, or bad? Once your claim is clear, you must develop reasons that match and correspond to the type of claim being made. Audience/Point of View: An effective argument is tailored to its audience. The reasons and the types of evidence you offer, the needs and values to which you appeal, terms defined, all depend on your audience and the type of claim. Ask: What does your audience know or not know about your topic? The audience is your instructor and classmates. Never assume that the audience is familiar with your topic or terms. You may need to include definitions and relevant details to help the audience understand your position in the first body paragraph. For this argument essay, you will use only the third-person point of view. No, “I” “We” or “You.” Content/Body Paragraphs. For the length of this assignment, you should have at least three-to-four distinct and relevant reasons to support your thesis. Follow the guidelines for writing the argument paper when developing your reasons. Use the “because” clause approach.

PART1 (WEEK1)IntroductionOver the eight weeks of the course,.docx

ssuser562afc1

PART1 (WEEK1) Introduction Over the eight weeks of the course, you will work on a paper that addresses a current controversial issue. This paper is to be in the form of an argument. You will select a topic, choose an issue related to that topic, thoroughly research both sides of the issue, and then write a paper that supports one side or the other of the issue. Your paper must define the issue, present evidence on both sides of the issue, and then argue that one side is stronger and more persuasive than the other. Your paper must address at least three relevant aspects of the issue. More specific directions for each part of the paper will be found within the specific assignment in the weekly modules. Here is a brief breakdown of the project so that you can plan your time in the course: Instructions Topic: Artificial intelligence State the topic (Artificial Intelligence) State the specific issue you will explore. This must be stated either as a question ("Should prostitution be legalized?") or a whether-or-not statement ("Whether prostitution should be legalized"). For the stated issue, state three (3) aspects of the issue that you think you will likely develop in your paper. Briefly state why you have chosen each aspect. You are not confined to three aspects only, but you must develop at least three. As you develop your paper, you may find other aspects that you deem more relevant, and may add or substitute those. Example: For the topic of prostitution, you might examine the aspect of personal autonomy, public health aspects, and law enforcement aspects, at a minimum. Example: For the topic of free healthcare for undocumented persons, you might address economic aspects, ethical aspects, and public health aspects, at a minimum. PART 2 (WEEK3) Introduction This week you continue to work on your paper that addresses a current controversial issue. This paper is to be in the form of an argument. You have selected a topic and chosen issues related to that topic; this week, you will thoroughly research both sides of the issues you have chosen. Keep in mind that your paper must define the issue, present evidence on both sides of the issue, and then argue that one side is stronger and more persuasive than the other. Your paper must address at least three relevant aspects of the issue. More specific directions for each part of the paper will be found within the specific assignment in the weekly modules; the assignment this week is to research both the pro and con sides of the issues you have chosen to address. Here is a brief breakdown of the project so that you can plan your time in the course: Week 1 Topic Selection Week 3 Issue Review (both sides) Week 5 Thesis & Annotated Bibliography (both sides) Week 7 Argumentative Paper Instructions This week, you will conduct an issue review for your selected topic for your project. Present a brief report of your r.

Review Paper.pptx

Osama Alam

This document provides guidance on how to write a review of a research article. It explains that an article review evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of a published paper and provides an analysis and interpretation of its value. The review should summarize the article, identify positive aspects, note any gaps, and critically evaluate the content through comparison and analysis. The document outlines the key components of an article review and provides a two-step process for writing one, including defining an organization structure, reading the article, and writing a review that summarizes the main points, highlights strengths and weaknesses, and takes a supported position on the author's assertions.

Project 3 MemorandumENG 3107Assessment Checklist_____Id.docx

briancrawford30935

Project 3: Memorandum ENG 3107 Assessment Checklist _____ Identification Lines (Date, To, From, Subject) _____ Subject Line (Topic and Focus) _____ Body Description Description of Recommendation Report problem or challenge and why problem/challenge important to address Objective of Recommendation Report (i.e.: What anticipate audience will need to know and do/change as result of Recommendation Report) Information (researched evidence) to be gathered to support recommendations in Recommendation Report, where anticipate finding research, how info might be used/analyzed Audience for Recommendation Report identified and audience’s needs anticipated Conclusion stating next steps and schedule for next steps (i.e. plan to begin Recommendation Report research, then revision, then editing, then submission) _____ Document Design and Layout 2-pages 12-point Times New Roman font Single-spaced lines 1st or 3rd person point of view Highlighting techniques _____ Concision _____ Clarity Specificity of detail Audience questions answered _____ Grammar, Spelling, Punctuation Please see official assignment description and Workplace Writing (chap. 10) for details related to assessment sheet’s categories. ENGL 101 Essay 2 Instructions and Checklist Ethical Argument In preparation for Essay 2 and by completing your textbook readings, you will be equipped to respond by objectively compiling information from a variety of sources to compose an essay that understands and practices reading, writing, and rhetoric within the context of a biblical worldview; applies methods of sound reasoning; produces well-structured essays; integrates sources accurately and effectively; writes with clarity; recognizes standard usage in English grammar, word choice (diction), phraseology, and sentence structure; and applies knowledge of sentence structure to basic sentence editing and revision (Syllabus MLOs: A, B, C, D, E, F, G and Module/Week 5 LOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). In Module/Week 5, you must write a 1,000–1,200 word ethical argument essay from the thesis/outline that you submitted in Module/Week 4. Please note the word count does not include citations. Ethical Essay Prompt Write an ethical argument in which you consider the topic, “How far should scientists go to modify humans through genetic engineering?” Use the websites included in the Reading & Study folder, your own academic research, and the Bible to include at least 4 quotations, 1 summary, and 1 paraphrase (6 total) from at least 3 of these sources. Be sure to document your sources correctly according to your documentation style (current APA, MLA, or Turabian). As you compose your essay, be sure to: a. Include all of the parts identified in “Structuring a Ethical Argument” found on page 599 in your Practical Argument textbook. b. Integrate at least a total of 4 quotations, 1 summary, and 1 paraphrases into your essay from at least 3 outside sources. c. Follow the appropriate formatting style for your degree.

ENGL 101Essay 3 ThesisOutline Instructions and ChecklistCause.docx

SALU18

ENGL 101 Essay 3 Thesis/Outline Instructions and Checklist Cause-and-Effect Argument Essay In preparation for Essay 3 and by completing your textbook readings, you will be equipped to respond by objectively compiling information from a variety of sources to compose an essay that understands and practices reading, writing, and rhetoric within the context of a biblical worldview; applies methods of sound reasoning; produces well-structured essays; integrates sources accurately and effectively; writes with clarity; recognizes standard usage in English grammar, word choice (diction), phraseology, and sentence structure; and applies knowledge of sentence structure to basic sentence editing and revision (Syllabus MLOs: A, B, C, D, E, F, G and Module/Week 8 LOs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). In Module/Week 7, you will write a thesis statement and outline for the cause and effect argument essay that you will write in the next module/week. Develop an outline for your cause and effect argument essay that includes a clear thesis statement and a plan of support. Be sure to include all parts identified in “Structuring a Cause and Effect Argument” on pages 475–476 in your Practical Argument textbook. In addition, include at least 4 quotations, 1 summary,and 1 paraphrases into your essay from at least 3 outside sources to support your thesis statement and provide opposing argument(s). Be sure to document your sources correctly according to your documentation style (APA, MLA, or Turabian). Your outside sources can include scholarly sources and the Bible. (Note: Wikipedia is NOT an acceptable source for academic writing.) Cause and Effect Essay Prompt Write a cause and effect argument in which you answer one of the following questions: 1. How far should the government go to reduce the likelihood of terrorism on American soil? 2. Should illegal immigrants in the Unites States have constitutional rights? 3. Do immigrants have a duty to assimilate themselves into local culture? Use academic research to include at least 4 quotations, 1 summary, and 1 paraphrase (at least 6 total) from at least 3 sources. Be sure to document your sources correctly according to your documentation style (current APA, MLA, or Turabian). The Bible can count as one of your sources. After reading pages 468–481 in your Practical Argument textbook, you will be prepared to plan your own cause and effect argument that addresses one of the following questions: 1. How far should the government go to reduce the likelihood of terrorism on American soil? 2. Should illegal immigrants in the Unites States have constitutional rights? 3. Do immigrants have a duty to assimilate themselves into local culture? Begin by reviewing the reading assignment with special attention to page 468—What is a Cause-and-Effect Argument?, page 471—Understanding Cause-and-Effect Relationships, and pages 475–476—Structuring a Cause-and-Effect Argument. Next, do some preliminary research about your topic utilizing the scho ...

Mill proposes his Art of Life, but he also insists that it is not very developed -- there is an immense amount of work to be done to get it in shape. We know relatively little about what will actually make our lives richly moral, useful, and beautiful. What sort of things might contribute to improving our understanding of how to enrich our lives in this way? That is, what could someone do to develop and extend the Art of Life? DUE by wed @ 10am central time somebody have something useful post it and i will look/buy .

Milford Bank and Trust Company is revamping its credit management de.docx

Rubric for Article ReviewAPACover55 point.docx

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from healdkathaleen

More from healdkathaleen (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Rubric for Article ReviewAPACover55 point.docx