RUBRIC
· Focus of community teaching is clear, consistent with
community teaching plan, detailed, and well supported. The
presentation demonstrates an ability to create effective teaching
plans relative to a population.
· Strong epidemiological rationale is provided and demonstrates
support for the topic presented.
· A comprehensive evaluation of teaching experience is
presented. Insight into self-appraisal in regard to teaching is
demonstrated.
· A detailed description of community response to teaching is
presented.
· Areas of strength and improvement are thoroughly discussed.
The author demonstrates insight into personal strengths and
areas where improvement would be beneficial.
· Thesis is comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the
essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the
paper clear.
· Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive
claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
· Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.

RUBRIC· Focus of community teaching is clear, consistent with co.docx

  • 1.
    RUBRIC · Focus ofcommunity teaching is clear, consistent with community teaching plan, detailed, and well supported. The presentation demonstrates an ability to create effective teaching plans relative to a population. · Strong epidemiological rationale is provided and demonstrates support for the topic presented. · A comprehensive evaluation of teaching experience is presented. Insight into self-appraisal in regard to teaching is demonstrated. · A detailed description of community response to teaching is presented. · Areas of strength and improvement are thoroughly discussed. The author demonstrates insight into personal strengths and areas where improvement would be beneficial. · Thesis is comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. · Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. · Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.