Rtpcr
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•3 views
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a patient named C K Wasiq. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 12/01/2022 and reported on 12/01/2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from patient Jawad Rahees. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus types, the test methodology, and guidance for interpreting negative and positive test results. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. The report provides information on the patient's details, test method used, pathogen information, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on result correlation with clinical findings. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The document is a laboratory report for a COVID-19 test. It summarizes that the test for patient Cherkala Abbas Mohammed was negative for SARS-CoV-2. The test used a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method. A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample but does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 27-year-old male patient. The SARS-CoV-2 test result was negative, indicating that the coronavirus was not detected in the patient's nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR) method. The report provides information on the coronavirus, interpretation of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test. The test on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from patient C K Wasiq was negative for SARS-CoV-2. The report provides background on corona viruses, interpretation of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was for SARS-CoV-2 detection using real-time PCR analysis. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on the test methodology, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes by noting the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient named Thaseena. The test was done using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on an unspecified date. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. Additional information provided includes details on the testing methodology used, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on testing limitations and the need to correlate results with clinical findings. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on the patient, test method, pathogen details, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on result correlation with clinical findings. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Recommended
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from patient Jawad Rahees. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus types, the test methodology, and guidance for interpreting negative and positive test results. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. The report provides information on the patient's details, test method used, pathogen information, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on result correlation with clinical findings. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The document is a laboratory report for a COVID-19 test. It summarizes that the test for patient Cherkala Abbas Mohammed was negative for SARS-CoV-2. The test used a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method. A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample but does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 27-year-old male patient. The SARS-CoV-2 test result was negative, indicating that the coronavirus was not detected in the patient's nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR) method. The report provides information on the coronavirus, interpretation of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test. The test on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from patient C K Wasiq was negative for SARS-CoV-2. The report provides background on corona viruses, interpretation of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was for SARS-CoV-2 detection using real-time PCR analysis. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on the test methodology, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes by noting the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient named Thaseena. The test was done using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on an unspecified date. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. Additional information provided includes details on the testing methodology used, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on testing limitations and the need to correlate results with clinical findings. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on the patient, test method, pathogen details, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on result correlation with clinical findings. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a 33-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The SARS-CoV-2 test on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen from patient Jawad Rahees came back negative. The report provides information on the test method used, test interpretation, and is signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a nasal/oropharyngeal swab sample from patient Abdul Khayoom C A. The test was done using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was SARS-CoV-2 negative, indicating that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus types, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample using RT-PCR. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the results in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from the patient and analyzed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the testing methodology used.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient sample. The test was for SARS-CoV-2 detection using real-time PCR and was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus types, test interpretation, and notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a 47-year-old male patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on February 1, 2022 and reported on March 1, 2022. The SARS-CoV-2 test result was negative, indicating that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a patient named Abdul Kader Usman. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 15/01/2022 and reported on 15/01/2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on the patient, test method, pathogen details, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes from the interpreting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a nasal/oral swab sample from patient Abdul Shareef C K. The test was done using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was negative, indicating SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus types, test interpretation, and is signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 42-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 15/01/2022 and analyzed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was reported as SARS-CoV-2 negative on 15/01/2022, indicating that the novel coronavirus was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named C K Wasiq shows that a SARS-CoV-2 test of their nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample returned a negative result. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methodology. A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's given specimen, but does not completely rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a 58-year-old female patient named CK Kunhamoo showed a SARS-CoV-2 test was negative. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result means SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen, but does not completely rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and interpretation of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 56-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on January 24, 2022 and reported on January 24, 2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a patient named Jawad Rahees. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that test results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was authored by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 22-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on December 24, 2021 and reported on December 25, 2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 negative, indicating that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method used, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a 57-year-old male patient. The SARS-CoV-2 test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample came back negative. The report provides information on the test method used, details on coronavirus and the test result interpretation. It concludes that the sample tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 but recommends correlating the results with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a sample from Ashthaf Ali C. The test was done using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the sample. The report provides information on the virus, outlines how to interpret positive and negative results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from patient Mohammed Ishak B A. The test was a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test performed on April 2, 2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on coronavirus types, test interpretation, and notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a sample collected from Mohammed Rafeeq Marathanadi. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real time PCR test. The test result was positive, indicating the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. A positive result suggests a diagnosis of COVID-19, though the result should be considered with the patient's clinical history and exposure risks. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Mohammed Valeed shows that a SARS-CoV-2 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 07/01/2022 came back negative. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and reported on 08/01/2022. A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given specimen but does not rule out infection, and the result should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on the test method, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
More Related Content
What's hot
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a 33-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The SARS-CoV-2 test on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen from patient Jawad Rahees came back negative. The report provides information on the test method used, test interpretation, and is signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a nasal/oropharyngeal swab sample from patient Abdul Khayoom C A. The test was done using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was SARS-CoV-2 negative, indicating that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus types, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample using RT-PCR. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the results in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from the patient and analyzed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the testing methodology used.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient sample. The test was for SARS-CoV-2 detection using real-time PCR and was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus types, test interpretation, and notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a 47-year-old male patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on February 1, 2022 and reported on March 1, 2022. The SARS-CoV-2 test result was negative, indicating that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a patient named Abdul Kader Usman. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 15/01/2022 and reported on 15/01/2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on the patient, test method, pathogen details, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes from the interpreting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a nasal/oral swab sample from patient Abdul Shareef C K. The test was done using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was negative, indicating SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus types, test interpretation, and is signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 42-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 15/01/2022 and analyzed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was reported as SARS-CoV-2 negative on 15/01/2022, indicating that the novel coronavirus was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named C K Wasiq shows that a SARS-CoV-2 test of their nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample returned a negative result. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methodology. A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's given specimen, but does not completely rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a 58-year-old female patient named CK Kunhamoo showed a SARS-CoV-2 test was negative. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result means SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen, but does not completely rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and interpretation of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 56-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on January 24, 2022 and reported on January 24, 2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a patient named Jawad Rahees. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that test results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was authored by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 22-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on December 24, 2021 and reported on December 25, 2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 negative, indicating that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method used, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a 57-year-old male patient. The SARS-CoV-2 test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample came back negative. The report provides information on the test method used, details on coronavirus and the test result interpretation. It concludes that the sample tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 but recommends correlating the results with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a sample from Ashthaf Ali C. The test was done using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the sample. The report provides information on the virus, outlines how to interpret positive and negative results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from patient Mohammed Ishak B A. The test was a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test performed on April 2, 2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on coronavirus types, test interpretation, and notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a sample collected from Mohammed Rafeeq Marathanadi. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real time PCR test. The test result was positive, indicating the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. A positive result suggests a diagnosis of COVID-19, though the result should be considered with the patient's clinical history and exposure risks. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Similar to Rtpcr
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Mohammed Valeed shows that a SARS-CoV-2 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 07/01/2022 came back negative. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and reported on 08/01/2022. A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given specimen but does not rule out infection, and the result should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on the test method, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient named Thaseena. The test was done using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on an unspecified date. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. Additional information provided includes details on the testing methodology used, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on testing limitations and the need to correlate results with clinical findings. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient sample collected on April 2, 2022. The SARS-CoV-2 test result for the patient identified as Mohammed Rameez M was negative. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, and the result should be interpreted in the clinical context. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report dated March 1, 2022 provides the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a sample collected from Rabiya T M on February 1, 2022. The SARS-CoV-2 test was conducted using real time polymerase chain reaction and produced a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens and notes that a negative test result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a sample from Fathimath Samla. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test, and the result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on the test methodology, details on coronavirus and the implications of positive and negative test results. It concludes by noting the results only apply to the sample tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient. The test was a qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology. It is signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
- The laboratory report is for a COVID-19 test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a patient named Jawad Rahees.
- The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample.
- A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 24-year-old female patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, as the test has limitations. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the negative results in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 20/12/2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method used, the coronavirus tested for, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes by noting the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Ummar Farook summarizes that a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was tested for COVID-19 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was negative. The test is intended to qualitatively detect SARS-CoV-2, the novel coronavirus identified in 2019. A negative result means SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample but does not completely rule out infection. The report was generated on August 1, 2022.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 29-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 04/02/2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the virus, testing method used, implications of positive and negative results, and notes that the results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 44-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidelines for interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
- The laboratory report is for a COVID-19 test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 43-year-old male.
- The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample.
- A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The test was intended to qualitatively detect SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methodology.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test on a 46-year-old male returned a negative result. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). While a negative result indicates SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample, the test result should be interpreted in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and exposure history, as a false negative is possible. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
More from Care Reference Laboratory
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient sample. The test was a qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was SARS-CoV-2 negative, indicating that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that test results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Certificate
This certificate confirms Saniya Bi Shaikh received two doses of the COVISHIELD COVID-19 vaccine. She received her first dose on August 3, 2021 from batch 4121Z088 and her second dose on October 30, 2021 from batch 4121Z105 at the Ponda PHC Satellite Centre in South Goa, Goa. The certificate can be verified online and contains contact information for reporting any adverse events.
Certificate
This certificate confirms that Saniya Bi Shaikh, an 18-year-old female, received the first dose of the COVISHIELD COVID-19 vaccine on July 3, 2021 and the second dose on September 30, 2021 at the Ponda PHC Satellite Centre in South Goa, Goa. The certificate can be verified online and lists contact information for reporting any adverse events.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report for a patient named Nidhi Subash shows the results of a COVID-19 test. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology. It is signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Nidhi subash rtpcr
This document is a lab report for a COVID-19 RT-PCR test. It indicates that the test for the sample from Miss. Nidhi Subash, a 24-year-old female, came back negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The test was performed at Sankar's Healthcare Scans and Diagnostics in Alappuzha, Kerala, India and analyzed samples from a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab using real-time RT-PCR. The report provides background on SARS-CoV-2 and the test methodology, and notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with clinical observations.
Co776 c21149409424137
The COVID-19 RT-PCR test result for Maitreyee Mishra was negative, as the test did not detect COVID-19 RNA in the patient's nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test was processed at Thyrocare in Navi Mumbai and the specimen was collected from the patient's home in Mumbai. The test aims to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 virus through amplification of specific genomic regions using polymerase chain reaction.
More from Care Reference Laboratory (6)
Recently uploaded
The Nervous and Chemical Regulation of Respiration
These lecture slides, by Dr Sidra Arshad, offer a simplified look into the mechanisms involved in the regulation of respiration:
Learning objectives:
1. Describe the organisation of respiratory center
2. Describe the nervous control of inspiration and respiratory rhythm
3. Describe the functions of the dorsal and respiratory groups of neurons
4. Describe the influences of the Pneumotaxic and Apneustic centers
5. Explain the role of Hering-Breur inflation reflex in regulation of inspiration
6. Explain the role of central chemoreceptors in regulation of respiration
7. Explain the role of peripheral chemoreceptors in regulation of respiration
8. Explain the regulation of respiration during exercise
9. Integrate the respiratory regulatory mechanisms
10. Describe the Cheyne-Stokes breathing
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 42, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 36, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
3. Chapter 13, Human Physiology by Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
Efficacy of Avartana Sneha in Ayurveda
Avartana Sneha is a unique method of Preparation of Sneha Kalpana in Ayurveda, mainly it is indicated for the Vataja rogas.
Does Over-Masturbation Contribute to Chronic Prostatitis.pptx
In some case, your chronic prostatitis may be related to over-masturbation. Generally, natural medicine Diuretic and Anti-inflammatory Pill can help mee get a cure.
Ketone bodies and metabolism-biochemistry
This slide consists of all the topics of ketone . This can be used for exam purpose for writing about Diabetic keto acidosis etc . Thank you
Clinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa Central
Clinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa Central Clinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa CentralClinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa CentralClinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa CentralClinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa Central
Adhd Medication Shortage Uk - trinexpharmacy.com
The UK is currently facing a Adhd Medication Shortage Uk, which has left many patients and their families grappling with uncertainty and frustration. ADHD, or Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, is a chronic condition that requires consistent medication to manage effectively. This shortage has highlighted the critical role these medications play in the daily lives of those affected by ADHD. Contact : +1 (747) 209 – 3649 E-mail : sales@trinexpharmacy.com
pathology MCQS introduction to pathology general pathology
pathology MCQS introduction to pathology general pathology
MERCURY GROUP.BHMS.MATERIA MEDICA.HOMOEOPATHY
Mercurius is named after the roman god mercurius, the god of trade and science. The planet mercurius is named after the same god. Mercurius is sometimes called hydrargyrum, means ‘watery silver’. Its shine and colour are very similar to silver, but mercury is a fluid at room temperatures. The name quick silver is a translation of hydrargyrum, where the word quick describes its tendency to scatter away in all directions.
The droplets have a tendency to conglomerate to one big mass, but on being shaken they fall apart into countless little droplets again. It is used to ignite explosives, like mercury fulminate, the explosive character is one of its general themes.
Top Travel Vaccinations in Manchester
Travel vaccination in Manchester offers comprehensive immunization services for individuals planning international trips. Expert healthcare providers administer vaccines tailored to your destination, ensuring you stay protected against various diseases. Conveniently located clinics and flexible appointment options make it easy to get the necessary shots before your journey. Stay healthy and travel with confidence by getting vaccinated in Manchester. Visit us: www.nxhealthcare.co.uk
Cell Therapy Expansion and Challenges in Autoimmune Disease
There is increasing confidence that cell therapies will soon play a role in the treatment of autoimmune disorders, but the extent of this impact remains to be seen. Early readouts on autologous CAR-Ts in lupus are encouraging, but manufacturing and cost limitations are likely to restrict access to highly refractory patients. Allogeneic CAR-Ts have the potential to broaden access to earlier lines of treatment due to their inherent cost benefits, however they will need to demonstrate comparable or improved efficacy to established modalities.
In addition to infrastructure and capacity constraints, CAR-Ts face a very different risk-benefit dynamic in autoimmune compared to oncology, highlighting the need for tolerable therapies with low adverse event risk. CAR-NK and Treg-based therapies are also being developed in certain autoimmune disorders and may demonstrate favorable safety profiles. Several novel non-cell therapies such as bispecific antibodies, nanobodies, and RNAi drugs, may also offer future alternative competitive solutions with variable value propositions.
Widespread adoption of cell therapies will not only require strong efficacy and safety data, but also adapted pricing and access strategies. At oncology-based price points, CAR-Ts are unlikely to achieve broad market access in autoimmune disorders, with eligible patient populations that are potentially orders of magnitude greater than the number of currently addressable cancer patients. Developers have made strides towards reducing cell therapy COGS while improving manufacturing efficiency, but payors will inevitably restrict access until more sustainable pricing is achieved.
Despite these headwinds, industry leaders and investors remain confident that cell therapies are poised to address significant unmet need in patients suffering from autoimmune disorders. However, the extent of this impact on the treatment landscape remains to be seen, as the industry rapidly approaches an inflection point.
Hemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.Gawad
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/Pt1nA32sdHQ
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/uFdc9F0rlP0
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
10 Benefits an EPCR Software should Bring to EMS Organizations
The benefits of an ePCR solution should extend to the whole EMS organization, not just certain groups of people or certain departments. It should provide more than just a form for entering and a database for storing information. It should also include a workflow of how information is communicated, used and stored across the entire organization.
Medical Quiz ( Online Quiz for API Meet 2024 ).pdf
This quiz was conducted as a promotional event for the 2024 Annual Meet of Kerala Chapter of API.
More than 20 participants took part everyday !
Demystifying Fallopian Tube Blockage- Grading the Differences and Implication...
Fallopian tube blockage may cause female infertility. For treatment, herbal medicine Fuyan Pill can be a solution.
share - Lions, tigers, AI and health misinformation, oh my!.pptx
• Pitfalls and pivots needed to use AI effectively in public health
• Evidence-based strategies to address health misinformation effectively
• Building trust with communities online and offline
• Equipping health professionals to address questions, concerns and health misinformation
• Assessing risk and mitigating harm from adverse health narratives in communities, health workforce and health system
Travel Clinic Cardiff: Health Advice for International Travelers
Travel Clinic Cardiff offers comprehensive travel health services, including vaccinations, travel advice, and preventive care for international travelers. Our expert team ensures you are well-prepared and protected for your journey, providing personalized consultations tailored to your destination. Conveniently located in Cardiff, we help you travel with confidence and peace of mind. Visit us: www.nxhealthcare.co.uk
Recently uploaded (20)
The Nervous and Chemical Regulation of Respiration
The Nervous and Chemical Regulation of Respiration
Does Over-Masturbation Contribute to Chronic Prostatitis.pptx
Does Over-Masturbation Contribute to Chronic Prostatitis.pptx
Clinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa Central
Clinic ^%[+27633867063*Abortion Pills For Sale In Tembisa Central
Tests for analysis of different pharmaceutical.pptx
Tests for analysis of different pharmaceutical.pptx
pathology MCQS introduction to pathology general pathology
pathology MCQS introduction to pathology general pathology
Cell Therapy Expansion and Challenges in Autoimmune Disease
Cell Therapy Expansion and Challenges in Autoimmune Disease
Hemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.Gawad
Hemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.Gawad
10 Benefits an EPCR Software should Bring to EMS Organizations
10 Benefits an EPCR Software should Bring to EMS Organizations
Medical Quiz ( Online Quiz for API Meet 2024 ).pdf
Medical Quiz ( Online Quiz for API Meet 2024 ).pdf
Demystifying Fallopian Tube Blockage- Grading the Differences and Implication...
Demystifying Fallopian Tube Blockage- Grading the Differences and Implication...
share - Lions, tigers, AI and health misinformation, oh my!.pptx
share - Lions, tigers, AI and health misinformation, oh my!.pptx
Travel Clinic Cardiff: Health Advice for International Travelers
Travel Clinic Cardiff: Health Advice for International Travelers
Rtpcr
- 1. LABORATORY REPORT : P135677 : 12/01/2022 2 :17 PM : 12/01/2022 2 :55 PM : 12/01/2022 4 :08 PM : Patient ID Registered On Collected On Reported On External Id : C K Wasiq : V134273 : 22 Y/ M Name Visit No Age/Gender Ref By Aadhar Card DOB : DDC KASARAGOD : XXXX XXXX XXXX : 14/06/1999 MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORT Test Name : COVID 19 SARS CoV 2 Detection by Qualitative Real Time PCR ICMR Registration Number: CARREFLABVKK SARS-CoV-2 Detection by Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction TEST RESULT SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE Specimen Type : Method : Nasopharyngeal/Oropharyngeal swab RTPCR This Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction test intended to use for the qualitative detection of a novel corona virus which was identified in 2019 at Wuhan City, Hubei province, China in upper respiratory tract specimens and lower respiratory tract specimens of infected people. Pathogen information : Corona viruses (CoV) are a large family of viruses that cause illness ranging from common cold to more severe diseases such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS -CoV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV). SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is a new strain that has not been previously identified in humans. Interpretation : A "POSITIVE" result indicates that Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA is present in the given sample and suggests the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Test result should always be considered in the context of patient's clinical history, physical examination, and epidemiologic exposures. A "NEGATIVE" result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 is not present in the patient's given specimen. Result should be correlated with patient’s history and clinical presentation. However it does not rule out the infection completely and should not be used as the sole basis for making decisions related to treatment and other patient management decisions. A false negative may resulted due to inadequate number of organisms are present in the specimen due to improper collection, transport or handling Note: The results relate only to the specimens tested and should be correlated with clinical findings Interpretation guidance: 1. Testing of referred clinical specimens was considered on the basis of request/referral received from/ through state surveillance officer(SSO) of concerned State Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme / any other health care facility affirming requirements of the case definition/s 2.A single negative test result, particularly if this is from an upper respiratory tract specimen, does not exclude infection 3.A positive test result is only tentative, and will be reconfirmed by retesting. 4.Repeat sampling and testing of lower respiratory specimen is strongly recommended in severe or progressive disease. The repeat specimens may be considered after a gap of 2-4 days after the collection of the first specimen for additional testing if required 5.A positive alternate pathogen does not necessarily rule out either, as little is yet known about the role of coinfections *** End of Report *** Page 1 of 1 Dr. Ronald A Roche MD Microbiology Consultant Microbiologist Dr. Reshmi Gopalakrishnan MD Microbiology Consultant Microbiologist