The document proposes resolutions for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) deal between the US, EU, and citizens. It suggests: 1) Creating 3 categories for food/ag products; 2) Taxing exhaustible materials used in products, paid at purchase or production location; 3) Common US-EU patent and standards systems, and state credit support for innovation. It also proposes: 4) Resolving legal grievances with 1/3 penalties going to compensation, support groups, and designated projects like food security, fusion energy, or space exploration. The resolutions aim to ease political concerns in Europe while favoring the EU, pushing economies, and supporting common goals through legal accountability.

1. Author: Pablo Fernández Sierra, Address: Asturias & Munich Email:pablofers@hotmail.com
Resolving the TTIP Deal
A new Economic Alliance between the USA, the European Union and the people
1) Creating 3 Quality Categories for food and the agricultural products
- Bio (The current Bio definition)
- Conventional (produced in the TTIP signatory countries)
- Intensive (Genetically modified, hormone treatments, special chemical use,…)
2) Enable a tax over the exhaustible new materials used to create the products
- The tax over the imported products are efficiency estimations (for Example: China)
- The tax is done on the used place (for small companies with only one facility on
the company address, for big companies with more facilities it is paid on the “used
facility”, for customers is on the buying place (postal address is the buying place).
- The tax over materials is the maximal between the buying and the selling place.
3) Innovation and market support (a common agency to lead the process):
- Common USA-UE patent
- Common USA-UE norm system
- State credit support to buy new machinery, to create new products or to insurance
(payment, quality, investments-legal environment…) (1% of the PIB of the country)
(The products and companies covered are only from the TTIP signatory countries).
4) Legal resolution on the offended customer’s country (note: a private court is treason):
- The grief of food and agriculture quality, is 1/3 of the penalty as the compensation,
1/3 is for the group supporting the legal claim, 1/3 goes to food security on the
offended country (the State buys local food with a live expectancy of +5 years and
it’ll stock it for 5 years, after it will be used for schools, social lunch and the army).
- The grief of exhaustible materials, is 1/3 of the penalty as the compensation, 1/3 is
for the group supporting the legal claim, 1/3 goes to research on fusion energy.
- The grief on the common market, is 1/3 of the penalty as the compensation, 1/3 is
for the group supporting the legal claim, 1/3 goes to space exploration agencies.
The agricultural agreement is to release the TTIP from the main political restrains in Europe.
The material use tax is a green tax for the State support, efficiency pressure, Europe favor.
The Innovation and market support will be a favor to the USA, and it will push the economy.
The legal frame conserves the legitimacy, supports the common projects, and the insurance
failures push the1% credit-support from machinery and innovation to legal compensation.