SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Download to read offline
NEIL ABERCROMBIE AARON S. FUJIOKA
GOVERNOR ADMINISTRATOR
STATE OF HAWAII
STATE PROCUREMENT OFFICE
P.O. Box 119
Honolulu, Hawaii 96810-0119
Telephone: (808) 587-4700
e-mail: state.procurement.offlce~hawaii.gov SPO 13-184
http://hawaii.gov/spo
June 21, 2013
Mr. Gregory King, Chair
Mr. David Langille, Vice-Chair
Mr. Dean Seki, Secretary
Mr. Howard Garval, Member
Mr. Ronald Hirano, Member
Ms. Kathy Suzuki-Kitagawa, Member
Procurement Policy Board
do State Comptroller
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
Dear Chair King and Members of the Board:
SUBJECT: Request for Reconsideration on Board’s Decision
This is to request that the Procurement Policy Board (Board) reconsider its decision at the
June 20, 2013 board meeting regarding agenda item no. Ill on:
Preventing 2 qualified applicants that the Department of Accounting and General
Services’ (DAGS), Department Personnel Officer (DPO) has determined are qualified
and the Board is not contesting as qualified, from being considered for the position by
blocking their application from being forwarded to the Governor. The Board’s only
responsibility in the recruitment for the Administrator in accordance with HRS §103D-
204 Establishment of the state procurement office; administrator, shall be: (b)
The administrator shall be appointed by the governor from a list of no less than three
and no more than five names submitted by the policy board.
• Withholding information to the public and operating in a non-transparent manner which is
a violation of “sunshine requirements” for public meetings by not revealing why 2
qualified applicants, which would remain nameless, are being discriminated against or
being treated in a disparaging manner. Each Board meeting is recorded in its minutes
as the means to provide public disclosure.
• Delaying the recruitment process by reopening the soliciting for additional applicants,
despite the Board stating that the 4 applicants are qualified, as the prior solicitation was
open to anyone qualified, had sufficient time to submit applications (4 weeks), and
produced more than the minimum required qualified applicants for submittal to the
Governor.
Mr. Gregory King, Chair, et al si~o 13-1s~1
June 21, 2013
Page 2
• Allowing a “second bite at the apple” to accommodate any late submittals, or either
possibly those that were earlier disqualified.
• Announcing that it would numerically rank the 4 qualified applicants at the May 29, 2013
meeting, but pursuant to the procurement code, do not have the authority. Although the
Board has not conducted any ranking to date, the announcement is improper. Again
stating, that the Board’s only responsibility in the recruitment for the Administrator in
accordance with HRS §103D-204 Establishment of the state procurement office;
administrator, shall be: (b) The administrator shall be appointed by the governor from
a list of no less than three and no more than five names submitted by the policy board.
These statutes do not allow ranking.
The Board’s action is creating controversy over the selection process by infusing the
appearance of preferential treatment, partisanship, and subjective influence. This tainting of the
selection process has created a situation of hostility and suspicion and will no doubt cause
irreparable harm to all associated/connected with this process. This action by the Board will
have a “chilling” effect, affecting current and prospective applicants who will lose trust and
confidence in this process.
In reconsidering the Board’s decision, it is requested that the Board allow the selection process
to continue as required by the statute, by submitting the names and applications of the 4
qualified applicants.
A reply is requested by July 12, 2013 as the State Procurement Office (SPO) has been tasked
with the re-solicitation (advertisement in newspaper) which has been placed on hold until this
matter has been satisfactorily resolved with the Board. SPO has also requested a meeting with
the DPO for resolution of this process requested by the Board.
Sincerely,
o~/c~(;WL~~~
Aaron S. Fujioka
c: Dianne Matsuura, DPO
The Honorable Barbara Krieg, Director
Department of Human Resources Development
Stella Kam, Deputy Attorney General
Ruth Yamaguchi, State Procurement Office
Mara Smith, State Procurement Office

More Related Content

What's hot

Ref 727062 ato australia
Ref 727062 ato australiaRef 727062 ato australia
Ref 727062 ato australia
Joan Lockwood
 
Canada spouse visa processing time 2015
Canada spouse visa processing time 2015Canada spouse visa processing time 2015
Canada spouse visa processing time 2015
Mustaq Ali
 
Fc 530 subpoena for the production of documentary evidence
Fc 530 subpoena for the production of documentary evidenceFc 530 subpoena for the production of documentary evidence
Fc 530 subpoena for the production of documentary evidence
screaminc
 

What's hot (12)

Concept trade union tanvir hossain
Concept trade union tanvir hossainConcept trade union tanvir hossain
Concept trade union tanvir hossain
 
Ref 727062 ato australia
Ref 727062 ato australiaRef 727062 ato australia
Ref 727062 ato australia
 
USCIS announces significant reliefs for H1B/L-1 and other Non immigrant Workers
USCIS announces significant reliefs for H1B/L-1 and other Non immigrant WorkersUSCIS announces significant reliefs for H1B/L-1 and other Non immigrant Workers
USCIS announces significant reliefs for H1B/L-1 and other Non immigrant Workers
 
HK Contract Law
HK Contract LawHK Contract Law
HK Contract Law
 
Step by Step Guide to Sponsor Spouse for Canada Immigration
Step by Step Guide to Sponsor Spouse for Canada ImmigrationStep by Step Guide to Sponsor Spouse for Canada Immigration
Step by Step Guide to Sponsor Spouse for Canada Immigration
 
Spouse or Partner Sponsorship In Canada
Spouse or Partner Sponsorship In CanadaSpouse or Partner Sponsorship In Canada
Spouse or Partner Sponsorship In Canada
 
National Company Law Tribunal By AAKASH TIWARI
National Company Law Tribunal By AAKASH TIWARINational Company Law Tribunal By AAKASH TIWARI
National Company Law Tribunal By AAKASH TIWARI
 
Canada spouse visa processing time 2015
Canada spouse visa processing time 2015Canada spouse visa processing time 2015
Canada spouse visa processing time 2015
 
Fc 530 subpoena for the production of documentary evidence
Fc 530 subpoena for the production of documentary evidenceFc 530 subpoena for the production of documentary evidence
Fc 530 subpoena for the production of documentary evidence
 
I 9 Compliance
I 9 ComplianceI 9 Compliance
I 9 Compliance
 
2013 05-08 12-33-14 (3)
2013 05-08 12-33-14 (3)2013 05-08 12-33-14 (3)
2013 05-08 12-33-14 (3)
 
NCLT & NCLAT by CS Ankur sharma
NCLT & NCLAT by CS Ankur sharmaNCLT & NCLAT by CS Ankur sharma
NCLT & NCLAT by CS Ankur sharma
 

Similar to Request for reconsideration 06 21-13

Virginia Unemployment Compensation; Some Practical Procedural Tips for Claimants
Virginia Unemployment Compensation; Some Practical Procedural Tips for ClaimantsVirginia Unemployment Compensation; Some Practical Procedural Tips for Claimants
Virginia Unemployment Compensation; Some Practical Procedural Tips for Claimants
Susan Wuchinich
 
Fitness to Practice Law In NJ 2010
Fitness to Practice Law In NJ 2010Fitness to Practice Law In NJ 2010
Fitness to Practice Law In NJ 2010
Lewis Sengstacke
 
Bashyam Spiro LLP - Hot Topics In Employment Based Immigration
Bashyam Spiro LLP - Hot Topics In Employment Based ImmigrationBashyam Spiro LLP - Hot Topics In Employment Based Immigration
Bashyam Spiro LLP - Hot Topics In Employment Based Immigration
mbashyam
 
direc tv group Proxy Statement 2006
direc tv group  Proxy Statement  2006direc tv group  Proxy Statement  2006
direc tv group Proxy Statement 2006
finance15
 
INSZoom Immigration Conference 2016 - PERM Process Recent Trends
INSZoom Immigration Conference 2016 - PERM Process Recent TrendsINSZoom Immigration Conference 2016 - PERM Process Recent Trends
INSZoom Immigration Conference 2016 - PERM Process Recent Trends
INSZoom
 
quest diagnostics 37253FPF13Apr04152139
quest diagnostics 37253FPF13Apr04152139quest diagnostics 37253FPF13Apr04152139
quest diagnostics 37253FPF13Apr04152139
finance34
 

Similar to Request for reconsideration 06 21-13 (20)

State auditor documents 2013
State auditor documents 2013State auditor documents 2013
State auditor documents 2013
 
Virginia Unemployment Compensation; Some Practical Procedural Tips for Claimants
Virginia Unemployment Compensation; Some Practical Procedural Tips for ClaimantsVirginia Unemployment Compensation; Some Practical Procedural Tips for Claimants
Virginia Unemployment Compensation; Some Practical Procedural Tips for Claimants
 
Recruiting and Hiring, Including Restrictive Covenants (Series: Protecting Yo...
Recruiting and Hiring, Including Restrictive Covenants (Series: Protecting Yo...Recruiting and Hiring, Including Restrictive Covenants (Series: Protecting Yo...
Recruiting and Hiring, Including Restrictive Covenants (Series: Protecting Yo...
 
Are You Suitable for Appointment to a Federal Law Enforcement Position (WIFL...
Are You Suitable for Appointment to a Federal Law Enforcement Position  (WIFL...Are You Suitable for Appointment to a Federal Law Enforcement Position  (WIFL...
Are You Suitable for Appointment to a Federal Law Enforcement Position (WIFL...
 
Fitness to Practice Law In NJ 2010
Fitness to Practice Law In NJ 2010Fitness to Practice Law In NJ 2010
Fitness to Practice Law In NJ 2010
 
CASE 45, 64 and 65.pptx
CASE 45, 64 and 65.pptxCASE 45, 64 and 65.pptx
CASE 45, 64 and 65.pptx
 
Bashyam Spiro LLP - Hot Topics In Employment Based Immigration
Bashyam Spiro LLP - Hot Topics In Employment Based ImmigrationBashyam Spiro LLP - Hot Topics In Employment Based Immigration
Bashyam Spiro LLP - Hot Topics In Employment Based Immigration
 
Options after an Appeals Council Denial
Options after an Appeals Council DenialOptions after an Appeals Council Denial
Options after an Appeals Council Denial
 
Welcome to the Team! Recruiting and Hiring, Including Restrictive Covenants
Welcome to the Team! Recruiting and Hiring, Including Restrictive CovenantsWelcome to the Team! Recruiting and Hiring, Including Restrictive Covenants
Welcome to the Team! Recruiting and Hiring, Including Restrictive Covenants
 
direc tv group Proxy Statement 2006
direc tv group  Proxy Statement  2006direc tv group  Proxy Statement  2006
direc tv group Proxy Statement 2006
 
NLRB New Union Election Rules
NLRB New Union Election RulesNLRB New Union Election Rules
NLRB New Union Election Rules
 
QLD EILS Seminar 13th June
QLD EILS Seminar 13th JuneQLD EILS Seminar 13th June
QLD EILS Seminar 13th June
 
15 Important Questions asked During pre employment background checks
15 Important Questions asked During pre employment background checks 15 Important Questions asked During pre employment background checks
15 Important Questions asked During pre employment background checks
 
Hawaii Ethics Commission Advisory 2013-02
Hawaii Ethics Commission Advisory 2013-02Hawaii Ethics Commission Advisory 2013-02
Hawaii Ethics Commission Advisory 2013-02
 
Welcome to the Team! Recruiting and Hiring, Including Restrictive Covenants (...
Welcome to the Team! Recruiting and Hiring, Including Restrictive Covenants (...Welcome to the Team! Recruiting and Hiring, Including Restrictive Covenants (...
Welcome to the Team! Recruiting and Hiring, Including Restrictive Covenants (...
 
INSZoom Immigration Conference 2016 - PERM Process Recent Trends
INSZoom Immigration Conference 2016 - PERM Process Recent TrendsINSZoom Immigration Conference 2016 - PERM Process Recent Trends
INSZoom Immigration Conference 2016 - PERM Process Recent Trends
 
City ethics commission agenda
City ethics commission agendaCity ethics commission agenda
City ethics commission agenda
 
quest diagnostics 37253FPF13Apr04152139
quest diagnostics 37253FPF13Apr04152139quest diagnostics 37253FPF13Apr04152139
quest diagnostics 37253FPF13Apr04152139
 
Employment law-trends
Employment law-trendsEmployment law-trends
Employment law-trends
 
Takata (Philippines) Corporation vs. Bureau of Labor Relations and Samahang L...
Takata (Philippines) Corporation vs. Bureau of Labor Relations and Samahang L...Takata (Philippines) Corporation vs. Bureau of Labor Relations and Samahang L...
Takata (Philippines) Corporation vs. Bureau of Labor Relations and Samahang L...
 

More from Honolulu Civil Beat

More from Honolulu Civil Beat (20)

Gov. David Ige response to U.S. Rep. Anna Eshoo
Gov. David Ige response to U.S. Rep. Anna EshooGov. David Ige response to U.S. Rep. Anna Eshoo
Gov. David Ige response to U.S. Rep. Anna Eshoo
 
Audit of the Department of the Honolulu Prosecuting Attorney’s Policies, Proc...
Audit of the Department of the Honolulu Prosecuting Attorney’s Policies, Proc...Audit of the Department of the Honolulu Prosecuting Attorney’s Policies, Proc...
Audit of the Department of the Honolulu Prosecuting Attorney’s Policies, Proc...
 
Audit of the Honolulu Police Department’s Policies, Procedures, and Controls
Audit of the Honolulu Police Department’s Policies, Procedures, and ControlsAudit of the Honolulu Police Department’s Policies, Procedures, and Controls
Audit of the Honolulu Police Department’s Policies, Procedures, and Controls
 
2019 Use of Force Annual Report HPD
2019 Use of Force Annual Report HPD 2019 Use of Force Annual Report HPD
2019 Use of Force Annual Report HPD
 
Office of Health Equity Goals Draft 10
Office of Health Equity Goals Draft 10Office of Health Equity Goals Draft 10
Office of Health Equity Goals Draft 10
 
NHPI COVID-19 Statement
NHPI COVID-19 StatementNHPI COVID-19 Statement
NHPI COVID-19 Statement
 
DLIR Response Language Access
DLIR Response Language AccessDLIR Response Language Access
DLIR Response Language Access
 
Language Access Letter To DLIR
Language Access Letter To DLIRLanguage Access Letter To DLIR
Language Access Letter To DLIR
 
ACLU Letter to HPD regarding racial profiling
ACLU Letter to HPD regarding racial profilingACLU Letter to HPD regarding racial profiling
ACLU Letter to HPD regarding racial profiling
 
ACLU Letter to HPD regarding racial profiling
ACLU Letter to HPD regarding racial profilingACLU Letter to HPD regarding racial profiling
ACLU Letter to HPD regarding racial profiling
 
Jane Doe v. Rehab Hospital
Jane Doe v. Rehab HospitalJane Doe v. Rehab Hospital
Jane Doe v. Rehab Hospital
 
Coronavirus HPHA
Coronavirus HPHA Coronavirus HPHA
Coronavirus HPHA
 
OHA Data Request
OHA Data RequestOHA Data Request
OHA Data Request
 
Letter from Palau to Guam
Letter from Palau to GuamLetter from Palau to Guam
Letter from Palau to Guam
 
Guam Governor's Letter to Pence
Guam Governor's Letter to Pence Guam Governor's Letter to Pence
Guam Governor's Letter to Pence
 
OHA Analysis by Akina
OHA Analysis by AkinaOHA Analysis by Akina
OHA Analysis by Akina
 
Case COFA Letter
Case COFA LetterCase COFA Letter
Case COFA Letter
 
List Of Pro Bono Legal Service Providers
List Of Pro Bono Legal Service ProvidersList Of Pro Bono Legal Service Providers
List Of Pro Bono Legal Service Providers
 
Arbitration Hearing Transcript December 2018
Arbitration Hearing Transcript December 2018Arbitration Hearing Transcript December 2018
Arbitration Hearing Transcript December 2018
 
Caldwell Press Release
Caldwell Press ReleaseCaldwell Press Release
Caldwell Press Release
 

Request for reconsideration 06 21-13

  • 1. NEIL ABERCROMBIE AARON S. FUJIOKA GOVERNOR ADMINISTRATOR STATE OF HAWAII STATE PROCUREMENT OFFICE P.O. Box 119 Honolulu, Hawaii 96810-0119 Telephone: (808) 587-4700 e-mail: state.procurement.offlce~hawaii.gov SPO 13-184 http://hawaii.gov/spo June 21, 2013 Mr. Gregory King, Chair Mr. David Langille, Vice-Chair Mr. Dean Seki, Secretary Mr. Howard Garval, Member Mr. Ronald Hirano, Member Ms. Kathy Suzuki-Kitagawa, Member Procurement Policy Board do State Comptroller Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Dear Chair King and Members of the Board: SUBJECT: Request for Reconsideration on Board’s Decision This is to request that the Procurement Policy Board (Board) reconsider its decision at the June 20, 2013 board meeting regarding agenda item no. Ill on: Preventing 2 qualified applicants that the Department of Accounting and General Services’ (DAGS), Department Personnel Officer (DPO) has determined are qualified and the Board is not contesting as qualified, from being considered for the position by blocking their application from being forwarded to the Governor. The Board’s only responsibility in the recruitment for the Administrator in accordance with HRS §103D- 204 Establishment of the state procurement office; administrator, shall be: (b) The administrator shall be appointed by the governor from a list of no less than three and no more than five names submitted by the policy board. • Withholding information to the public and operating in a non-transparent manner which is a violation of “sunshine requirements” for public meetings by not revealing why 2 qualified applicants, which would remain nameless, are being discriminated against or being treated in a disparaging manner. Each Board meeting is recorded in its minutes as the means to provide public disclosure. • Delaying the recruitment process by reopening the soliciting for additional applicants, despite the Board stating that the 4 applicants are qualified, as the prior solicitation was open to anyone qualified, had sufficient time to submit applications (4 weeks), and produced more than the minimum required qualified applicants for submittal to the Governor.
  • 2. Mr. Gregory King, Chair, et al si~o 13-1s~1 June 21, 2013 Page 2 • Allowing a “second bite at the apple” to accommodate any late submittals, or either possibly those that were earlier disqualified. • Announcing that it would numerically rank the 4 qualified applicants at the May 29, 2013 meeting, but pursuant to the procurement code, do not have the authority. Although the Board has not conducted any ranking to date, the announcement is improper. Again stating, that the Board’s only responsibility in the recruitment for the Administrator in accordance with HRS §103D-204 Establishment of the state procurement office; administrator, shall be: (b) The administrator shall be appointed by the governor from a list of no less than three and no more than five names submitted by the policy board. These statutes do not allow ranking. The Board’s action is creating controversy over the selection process by infusing the appearance of preferential treatment, partisanship, and subjective influence. This tainting of the selection process has created a situation of hostility and suspicion and will no doubt cause irreparable harm to all associated/connected with this process. This action by the Board will have a “chilling” effect, affecting current and prospective applicants who will lose trust and confidence in this process. In reconsidering the Board’s decision, it is requested that the Board allow the selection process to continue as required by the statute, by submitting the names and applications of the 4 qualified applicants. A reply is requested by July 12, 2013 as the State Procurement Office (SPO) has been tasked with the re-solicitation (advertisement in newspaper) which has been placed on hold until this matter has been satisfactorily resolved with the Board. SPO has also requested a meeting with the DPO for resolution of this process requested by the Board. Sincerely, o~/c~(;WL~~~ Aaron S. Fujioka c: Dianne Matsuura, DPO The Honorable Barbara Krieg, Director Department of Human Resources Development Stella Kam, Deputy Attorney General Ruth Yamaguchi, State Procurement Office Mara Smith, State Procurement Office