This document summarizes various legal methods for reorganizing companies in Germany, including mergers, spin-offs, conversions, and corporate group contracts. It outlines the key steps and legal features of transformations according to the Transformation Act, including transferring assets and liabilities between companies and changing shareholder rights. It also discusses relevant tax aspects, such as continuing book values or forfeiting loss carryforwards depending on the type of reorganization.
Ricardo Pons M., Juan Francisco Torres Landa R. and Omar Guerrero R., Partners of Barrera Siqueiros y Torres Landa, published a chapter regarding merger control applicable law and competent government agencies in Latin Lawyer, one of the most important publications in the legal world. This written piece includes a complete analysis through strategic questions about the contents of the Federal Law of Economic Competition (FLEC) and its Regulations.
Ricardo Pons M., Juan Francisco Torres Landa R. and Omar Guerrero R., Partners of Barrera Siqueiros y Torres Landa, published a chapter regarding merger control applicable law and competent government agencies in Latin Lawyer, one of the most important publications in the legal world. This written piece includes a complete analysis through strategic questions about the contents of the Federal Law of Economic Competition (FLEC) and its Regulations.
This article published in the Chamber of Tax Consultants "IT Review" analysis the procedure and bottlenecks in conversion of other business entities to Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) in India
DRAFT – For Discussion Purposes Only MemorandumTo Energy WorkDustiBuckner14
DRAFT – For Discussion Purposes Only
Memorandum
To: Energy Works, Inc. Accounting Files
From: Richard Smith, Accounting Policy team
Date: 12/1/20X1
Re: Accounting for proposed joint venture with Big Oil, Inc.
Sidebar: The type of transaction is described succinctly in the “Re” line
Facts
Energy Works, Inc. is a nonpublic oil and gas company that is forming a joint venture (JV) with Big Oil, Inc. for the extraction of proved oil reserves in the arctic. Both venturers wish to share in the risks and rewards of this venture, while benefiting from each other’s technical expertise and sharing of key assets. Energy Works will contribute a floating production storage and offloading facility (FPSO), valued at $100 million, along with $20 million in cash, to the venture in exchange for a 50% equity interest. Energy Works is not in the business of marketing its production facilities and equipment for sale; rather, it uses these facilities in its own oil and gas producing activities.
Big Oil will contribute its arctic drilling permit, also valued at $100 million, along with $20 million in cash, to the venture in exchange for a 50% equity interest. Assume that the cost basis of the contributed assets is the same as the fair values of these assets. Profits and losses of the venture will be shared based upon the equity interest held by each investor.
Operations of the joint venture will be overseen by its Board of Directors. Each venturer will receive 2 seats on the Board, for a total of 4 seats, and all significant decisions of the JV require the unanimous consent of the Board, with any disputes to be settled by an independent arbitrator (binding arbitration). The Board has appointed Energy Works to manage the day-to-day operations of the FPSO facility. Additionally, both venturers will provide employees and managerial personnel with technical expertise to perform day-to-day operations for the JV. Energy Works will not receive separate compensation for its role as manager. The joint venture will be legally organized as an LLC.
The following picture illustrates the relationships between the parties in this arrangement.
Energy Works must determine how to record its investment in the JV.
Issues
1. Is Energy Works required to consolidate the joint venture?
2. If consolidation is not required, what accounting method should Energy Works use to account for its investment in the JV?
3. How will Energy Works record the transfer of the FPSO facility to the JV?*
*This issue is not evaluated in full within this memo, however a discussion of key considerations is provided.
Sidebar: Notice that each issue is phrased in the form of a question.
Analysis – Issue 1: Is Energy Works required to consolidate the joint venture?
FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 810-10 (Consolidation) provides guidance for determining when consolidation of another entity is required. Two consolidation models are provided: the variable interest entity (VIE) model and the ...
How capital gain is to be computed when superstructure (building) less than 3...D Murali ☆
How capital gain is to be computed when superstructure (building) less than 3 years old and constructed on an old land owned for more than 3 years is sold - T. N. Pandey - Article published in Business Advisor, dated February 10, 2015 http://www.magzter.com/IN/Shrinikethan/Business-Advisor/Business/
Taxation of Damages- "Damages paid for Breach of Contract to attract GST"EquiCorp Associates
Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) has ruled that payments in respect to non-performance of a contract would be liable for Goods & Service Tax (GST). This view is based on the provisions under the erstwhile Service Tax Law, “agreeing to the obligation to refrain from an act, or to tolerate an act or a situation, or to do an act” was a declared service under Section 66E(e) of Finance Act, 1994. Similar provision has been incorporated in Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) also under Schedule II. Under GST law, the taxable event is supply which has been defined widely and includes all forms of supply for a consideration which is made in course of or in furtherance of business. The act of tolerance or agreeing to refrain from an act is treated as supply of service under the CGST Act. As per these provisions there should be an agreement between the parties to either refrain from doing an act, or to tolerate an act/situation or to do an act.
International Business Group partner Emma Doherty and Corporate M&A partner Fergus Bolster continue the Directors' Guidance Series with a statement covering the summary approval procedure introduced by the Companies Act 2014 and the role that company directors play in this process.
LLP is the modern business entity in current business scenario. LLP law has been recently enacted in India. Finance Bill 2009 lays the way how LLP would be taxed in India. Article which has been published in The Chmaber of Tax Consultants "IT Review" analyses taxation of LLP in India.
This article published in the Chamber of Tax Consultants "IT Review" analysis the procedure and bottlenecks in conversion of other business entities to Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) in India
DRAFT – For Discussion Purposes Only MemorandumTo Energy WorkDustiBuckner14
DRAFT – For Discussion Purposes Only
Memorandum
To: Energy Works, Inc. Accounting Files
From: Richard Smith, Accounting Policy team
Date: 12/1/20X1
Re: Accounting for proposed joint venture with Big Oil, Inc.
Sidebar: The type of transaction is described succinctly in the “Re” line
Facts
Energy Works, Inc. is a nonpublic oil and gas company that is forming a joint venture (JV) with Big Oil, Inc. for the extraction of proved oil reserves in the arctic. Both venturers wish to share in the risks and rewards of this venture, while benefiting from each other’s technical expertise and sharing of key assets. Energy Works will contribute a floating production storage and offloading facility (FPSO), valued at $100 million, along with $20 million in cash, to the venture in exchange for a 50% equity interest. Energy Works is not in the business of marketing its production facilities and equipment for sale; rather, it uses these facilities in its own oil and gas producing activities.
Big Oil will contribute its arctic drilling permit, also valued at $100 million, along with $20 million in cash, to the venture in exchange for a 50% equity interest. Assume that the cost basis of the contributed assets is the same as the fair values of these assets. Profits and losses of the venture will be shared based upon the equity interest held by each investor.
Operations of the joint venture will be overseen by its Board of Directors. Each venturer will receive 2 seats on the Board, for a total of 4 seats, and all significant decisions of the JV require the unanimous consent of the Board, with any disputes to be settled by an independent arbitrator (binding arbitration). The Board has appointed Energy Works to manage the day-to-day operations of the FPSO facility. Additionally, both venturers will provide employees and managerial personnel with technical expertise to perform day-to-day operations for the JV. Energy Works will not receive separate compensation for its role as manager. The joint venture will be legally organized as an LLC.
The following picture illustrates the relationships between the parties in this arrangement.
Energy Works must determine how to record its investment in the JV.
Issues
1. Is Energy Works required to consolidate the joint venture?
2. If consolidation is not required, what accounting method should Energy Works use to account for its investment in the JV?
3. How will Energy Works record the transfer of the FPSO facility to the JV?*
*This issue is not evaluated in full within this memo, however a discussion of key considerations is provided.
Sidebar: Notice that each issue is phrased in the form of a question.
Analysis – Issue 1: Is Energy Works required to consolidate the joint venture?
FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 810-10 (Consolidation) provides guidance for determining when consolidation of another entity is required. Two consolidation models are provided: the variable interest entity (VIE) model and the ...
How capital gain is to be computed when superstructure (building) less than 3...D Murali ☆
How capital gain is to be computed when superstructure (building) less than 3 years old and constructed on an old land owned for more than 3 years is sold - T. N. Pandey - Article published in Business Advisor, dated February 10, 2015 http://www.magzter.com/IN/Shrinikethan/Business-Advisor/Business/
Taxation of Damages- "Damages paid for Breach of Contract to attract GST"EquiCorp Associates
Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) has ruled that payments in respect to non-performance of a contract would be liable for Goods & Service Tax (GST). This view is based on the provisions under the erstwhile Service Tax Law, “agreeing to the obligation to refrain from an act, or to tolerate an act or a situation, or to do an act” was a declared service under Section 66E(e) of Finance Act, 1994. Similar provision has been incorporated in Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) also under Schedule II. Under GST law, the taxable event is supply which has been defined widely and includes all forms of supply for a consideration which is made in course of or in furtherance of business. The act of tolerance or agreeing to refrain from an act is treated as supply of service under the CGST Act. As per these provisions there should be an agreement between the parties to either refrain from doing an act, or to tolerate an act/situation or to do an act.
International Business Group partner Emma Doherty and Corporate M&A partner Fergus Bolster continue the Directors' Guidance Series with a statement covering the summary approval procedure introduced by the Companies Act 2014 and the role that company directors play in this process.
LLP is the modern business entity in current business scenario. LLP law has been recently enacted in India. Finance Bill 2009 lays the way how LLP would be taxed in India. Article which has been published in The Chmaber of Tax Consultants "IT Review" analyses taxation of LLP in India.