Dr. Shahid Maqsood
Asstt. Prof.Anesthesia
Regional Anesthesia,
Scope & Prospects
Regional Anesthesia
 Introduction
 Types
 Scope
 Prospects
Introduction
 Regional anesthesia involves injection of local anesthetic
agents around nerves in the peripheral or central nervous
system to achieve reversible removal of nerve conduction and
pain senses in the corresponding innervated tissue without
causing loss of consciousness.
Introduction
 Regional anesthesia has a very interesting long history,
initially preferred over general anesthesia because of
safety concerns.
 The initial enthusiasm retreated with new general
anesthetic drugs and anesthetic adjuvants in the 1930s to
1950s.
 Introduction of long-acting local anesthetics and
development of techniques for their safe use in the last
quarter of the century resurrected the fortunes of
regional anesthesia.
Introduction
 Nowadays instead of competing, general and regional anesthesia
are complementing each other as a part of perioperative
management.
 It is commonly believed that regional anesthesia is more
reliable than general anesthesia, especially among elderly
patients, a difference has also been demonstrated between
the two anesthesia types in terms of mortality and morbidity
Types
 Central Neuraxial Block
 Spinal Anesthesia
 Epidural Anesthesia
 Peripheral Nerve Blocks
 Fascial Plane Blocks.
Central Neuraxial Block
 CNB involves administration
of drugs in the epidural or
subarachnoid space for
anesthesia or analgesia of the
respective spinal cord section.
 It is the oldest and most
commonly used regional
block technique.
Central Neuraxial Block
 The fact that epidural anesthesia can be
applied to a specific part of the spinal cord,
makes it useful for procedures where only a
segment of the cord needs to be anesthetized,
for example Cervical,Thoracic, Upper
Lumbar (for labour), and Caudal blocks.
 Moreover the placement of catheter in the
epidural space makes prolonged
anesthesia/analgesia possible.
Peripheral Nerve Block
 Involves the deposition of local anesthetic
around a discrete nerve or a plexus.
 Although the use of this technique gained
attention around 2 decades ago,there has
been a steep rise in these procedures with
the advent of ultrasound usage in
anesthesia practices.
 Ultrasound has not only increased the
efficacy of these techniques, but has also
reduced the incidence of inadvertant
nerve injury.
Scope
 Regional anesthesia has undergone a growing renaissance in recent
decades, primarily due to the maturation of ultrasound-guided
techniques, which have placed competence in core block techniques
within reach of most anesthetists.
 Ultrasound technology has made the blocks safer and successful by
directly visualizing targeted nerves and location of local anesthetics.
Recently, through ultrasound, the application of local anesthetics into
novel fascia layers has been increasingly utilized.
Scope
 Frequency of use is increasing due to advantages over general
anesthesia
Avoidance of airway manipulation
Reduced doses and side effects of systemic drugs
Lower postoperative nausea and vomiting
Faster recovery time and early mobilization.
Significantly lower pain levels after surgery.
Shortened hospital stay
Scope
 For patients with severe systemic disease, regional anesthesia
offers a safe alternative to general anesthesia.
Scope
 Some very common uses of regional anethesia are
In patients with Pulmonary pathologies such as
Consolidation
Diffuse lung disease
Inflammatory pathology
In patients with compromised hemodynamics
Upper and Lower Extremity Surgeries
Lower Abdominal and Pelvic Surgeries
Postoperative pain control
Treat certain chronic pain conditions
Prospects
 Fascial Plane Blocks
 Advances in Safety
 Post operative pain management
 Regional Anesthesia; Beyond Pain management
 Acute Perioperative Pain Services
 Training andAcademics
Prospects
• Fascial plane blocks
Rise in popularity of regional anesthesia techniques that involve
an injection of local anesthetic into fascial planes rather than
directly around discrete nerves
Fascial plane blocks have found particular application in truncal
analgesia as simpler and safer alternatives to thoracic epidural
and paravertebral blockade
Prospects
 Fascial plane blocks
The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block was the first to
enter mainstream practice, beginning as a surface landmark
guided technique and evolving into what is now known as the
lateral ultrasound-guided TAP block.
As the understanding of abdominal wall anatomy and
innervation advanced, variants on the lateral ultrasound-guided
TAP block approach developed, including the subcostal and
posteriorTAP blocks .
Prospects
 Fascial plane blocks
 The site of actual injection into the TAP plane determines the
area of abdominal wall coverage
 Thus the clinical indication and expected efficacy forTAP
blocks will depend on the specific approach being employed
 Although TAP blocks have not replaced thoracic epidurals for
analgesia in major abdominal surgery, the evidence indicates
they are modestly effective with fewer side-effects than
epidurals, particularly hypotension.
Prospects
 Fascial plane blocks
 Other ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks such as the
rectus sheath, erector spinae plane (ESP) and
quadratus lumborum(QL) blocks may soon supersede
TAP block in its role as a simpler alternative to epidural
analgesia.
Prospects : Advances In Safety
Adoption of ultrasound guidance has contributed to the safety
of regional anesthesia, particularly due to the reduced risk of
local anesthetic systemic toxicity following peripheral nerve
blockade
This can be attributed to associated reductions in minimum
local anesthetic dose requirements and accidental vascular
puncture.
Prospects
 Advances In Safety
 A similar impact of ultrasound guidance on the risk of
neurological complications following regional anesthesia has
yet to be conclusively demonstrated
 However, this is unsurprising given the multifactorial etiology
and relatively low incidence of peri-operative peripheral nerve
injury.
Prospects
 Advances In Safety
 Advances in regional anesthesia in this regard pertain primarily
to both an increased understanding of the micro architecture of
nerves and their surrounding tissues, as well as the ability to be
more selective about where we place the needle tip and deposit
drugs in relation to the nerve.
 There has been a push for safer approaches to regional
anesthesia techniques, particularly in the brachial plexus, that
involve placing the needle or catheter tip further away from
target nerves
Prospects
 Advances In Safety
 At the same time, the recognition that ultrasound-guided
regional anesthesia is a relatively complex procedure has led to
a greater focus on developing effective teaching strategies and
competency assessment tools.
 It is likely that a structured educational approach, utilising
defined task metrics, will improve learner performance
Prospects: Postoperative Pain
 There is growing recognition of the need to reevaluate opioid
use as a mainstay of anesthesia and acute pain management
 Regional anesthesia has always had a role to play in
perioperative opioid requirements, but it should no longer
be seen as merely an alternative to general anesthesia, rather
a complement to an overall multimodal anesthetic strategy
Prospects
 Postoperative Pain
 Regional anesthesia may also contribute to a reduced risk of
persistent postoperative pain in a variety of clinical settings,
including breast surgery, thoracotomy and caesarean section.
 Optimal efficacy for management of both acute and chronic
postoperative pain is likely to be obtained with pre-incisional rather
than postoperative nerve blockade and in combination with other
perioperative multimodal analgesic strategies.
 This speaks to the importance of integrating regional anesthesia and
general anesthesia where indicated, rather than regarding them as
‘either/or’ options.
Regional Anesthesia: Beyond Acute Pain
Management
 The potential benefits of peri-operative regional anesthesia
extend beyond acute pain relief.
 In total hip and knee arthroplasty, several large retrospective
studies have shown that, when compared with general
anesthesia, neuraxial anesthesia is associated with a reduction
in
 patient mortality
 major morbidity (e.g. pulmonary complications, transfusion
requirements) and
 economic outcomes such as length of hospital stay.
Prospects:
Acute Perioperative Pain Service
 Established as a relatively new but important concept and
service in clinical patient care.
 There is growing evidence of the multiple benefits of a
dedicatedAPPS, especially pertaining to patients at higher
risk of poorly controlled postoperative pain.
 Importance of the perioperative pain management
continuity of care, consisting of preoperative pain evaluations
and post-discharge follow-up in an outpatient pain
management setting, in coordination with the primary teams.
Prospects
 Acute Perioperative Pain Service
 The APPS is becoming the clinical standard of care for
managing postoperative pain, and its role continues to expand
worldwide
Prospects: Training & Academics
 Residents continue to report limited
peripheral nerve block experience
during the course of standard
residency training
 Practice of regional anesthesia has
expanded over the past 2 decades,
particularly with regards to
continuous epidural analgesia and
perineural catheter techniques.
Prospects
 Training
 The benefits of regional anesthesia with respect to postoperative
analgesia, decreased nausea and vomiting, and patient safety is
increasingly realized by surgeons as well.
 However, resident training in regional anesthesia and analgesia
techniques may not be fully concordant with the perception of
increased demand.
Prospects
 Training
 There is a need to develop method of increasing exposure of
residents to peripheral nerve block procedures.
 To formulate guidelines for regional anesthesia fellowship
training and develop post fellowship programs for regional
anesthesia training.
Thanks

Regional Anesthesia, Scope & Prospects.pptx

  • 1.
    Dr. Shahid Maqsood Asstt.Prof.Anesthesia Regional Anesthesia, Scope & Prospects
  • 2.
    Regional Anesthesia  Introduction Types  Scope  Prospects
  • 3.
    Introduction  Regional anesthesiainvolves injection of local anesthetic agents around nerves in the peripheral or central nervous system to achieve reversible removal of nerve conduction and pain senses in the corresponding innervated tissue without causing loss of consciousness.
  • 4.
    Introduction  Regional anesthesiahas a very interesting long history, initially preferred over general anesthesia because of safety concerns.  The initial enthusiasm retreated with new general anesthetic drugs and anesthetic adjuvants in the 1930s to 1950s.  Introduction of long-acting local anesthetics and development of techniques for their safe use in the last quarter of the century resurrected the fortunes of regional anesthesia.
  • 5.
    Introduction  Nowadays insteadof competing, general and regional anesthesia are complementing each other as a part of perioperative management.  It is commonly believed that regional anesthesia is more reliable than general anesthesia, especially among elderly patients, a difference has also been demonstrated between the two anesthesia types in terms of mortality and morbidity
  • 6.
    Types  Central NeuraxialBlock  Spinal Anesthesia  Epidural Anesthesia  Peripheral Nerve Blocks  Fascial Plane Blocks.
  • 7.
    Central Neuraxial Block CNB involves administration of drugs in the epidural or subarachnoid space for anesthesia or analgesia of the respective spinal cord section.  It is the oldest and most commonly used regional block technique.
  • 8.
    Central Neuraxial Block The fact that epidural anesthesia can be applied to a specific part of the spinal cord, makes it useful for procedures where only a segment of the cord needs to be anesthetized, for example Cervical,Thoracic, Upper Lumbar (for labour), and Caudal blocks.  Moreover the placement of catheter in the epidural space makes prolonged anesthesia/analgesia possible.
  • 9.
    Peripheral Nerve Block Involves the deposition of local anesthetic around a discrete nerve or a plexus.  Although the use of this technique gained attention around 2 decades ago,there has been a steep rise in these procedures with the advent of ultrasound usage in anesthesia practices.  Ultrasound has not only increased the efficacy of these techniques, but has also reduced the incidence of inadvertant nerve injury.
  • 10.
    Scope  Regional anesthesiahas undergone a growing renaissance in recent decades, primarily due to the maturation of ultrasound-guided techniques, which have placed competence in core block techniques within reach of most anesthetists.  Ultrasound technology has made the blocks safer and successful by directly visualizing targeted nerves and location of local anesthetics. Recently, through ultrasound, the application of local anesthetics into novel fascia layers has been increasingly utilized.
  • 11.
    Scope  Frequency ofuse is increasing due to advantages over general anesthesia Avoidance of airway manipulation Reduced doses and side effects of systemic drugs Lower postoperative nausea and vomiting Faster recovery time and early mobilization. Significantly lower pain levels after surgery. Shortened hospital stay
  • 12.
    Scope  For patientswith severe systemic disease, regional anesthesia offers a safe alternative to general anesthesia.
  • 13.
    Scope  Some verycommon uses of regional anethesia are In patients with Pulmonary pathologies such as Consolidation Diffuse lung disease Inflammatory pathology In patients with compromised hemodynamics Upper and Lower Extremity Surgeries Lower Abdominal and Pelvic Surgeries Postoperative pain control Treat certain chronic pain conditions
  • 14.
    Prospects  Fascial PlaneBlocks  Advances in Safety  Post operative pain management  Regional Anesthesia; Beyond Pain management  Acute Perioperative Pain Services  Training andAcademics
  • 15.
    Prospects • Fascial planeblocks Rise in popularity of regional anesthesia techniques that involve an injection of local anesthetic into fascial planes rather than directly around discrete nerves Fascial plane blocks have found particular application in truncal analgesia as simpler and safer alternatives to thoracic epidural and paravertebral blockade
  • 16.
    Prospects  Fascial planeblocks The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block was the first to enter mainstream practice, beginning as a surface landmark guided technique and evolving into what is now known as the lateral ultrasound-guided TAP block. As the understanding of abdominal wall anatomy and innervation advanced, variants on the lateral ultrasound-guided TAP block approach developed, including the subcostal and posteriorTAP blocks .
  • 18.
    Prospects  Fascial planeblocks  The site of actual injection into the TAP plane determines the area of abdominal wall coverage  Thus the clinical indication and expected efficacy forTAP blocks will depend on the specific approach being employed  Although TAP blocks have not replaced thoracic epidurals for analgesia in major abdominal surgery, the evidence indicates they are modestly effective with fewer side-effects than epidurals, particularly hypotension.
  • 19.
    Prospects  Fascial planeblocks  Other ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks such as the rectus sheath, erector spinae plane (ESP) and quadratus lumborum(QL) blocks may soon supersede TAP block in its role as a simpler alternative to epidural analgesia.
  • 20.
    Prospects : AdvancesIn Safety Adoption of ultrasound guidance has contributed to the safety of regional anesthesia, particularly due to the reduced risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity following peripheral nerve blockade This can be attributed to associated reductions in minimum local anesthetic dose requirements and accidental vascular puncture.
  • 21.
    Prospects  Advances InSafety  A similar impact of ultrasound guidance on the risk of neurological complications following regional anesthesia has yet to be conclusively demonstrated  However, this is unsurprising given the multifactorial etiology and relatively low incidence of peri-operative peripheral nerve injury.
  • 22.
    Prospects  Advances InSafety  Advances in regional anesthesia in this regard pertain primarily to both an increased understanding of the micro architecture of nerves and their surrounding tissues, as well as the ability to be more selective about where we place the needle tip and deposit drugs in relation to the nerve.  There has been a push for safer approaches to regional anesthesia techniques, particularly in the brachial plexus, that involve placing the needle or catheter tip further away from target nerves
  • 23.
    Prospects  Advances InSafety  At the same time, the recognition that ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia is a relatively complex procedure has led to a greater focus on developing effective teaching strategies and competency assessment tools.  It is likely that a structured educational approach, utilising defined task metrics, will improve learner performance
  • 24.
    Prospects: Postoperative Pain There is growing recognition of the need to reevaluate opioid use as a mainstay of anesthesia and acute pain management  Regional anesthesia has always had a role to play in perioperative opioid requirements, but it should no longer be seen as merely an alternative to general anesthesia, rather a complement to an overall multimodal anesthetic strategy
  • 25.
    Prospects  Postoperative Pain Regional anesthesia may also contribute to a reduced risk of persistent postoperative pain in a variety of clinical settings, including breast surgery, thoracotomy and caesarean section.  Optimal efficacy for management of both acute and chronic postoperative pain is likely to be obtained with pre-incisional rather than postoperative nerve blockade and in combination with other perioperative multimodal analgesic strategies.  This speaks to the importance of integrating regional anesthesia and general anesthesia where indicated, rather than regarding them as ‘either/or’ options.
  • 26.
    Regional Anesthesia: BeyondAcute Pain Management  The potential benefits of peri-operative regional anesthesia extend beyond acute pain relief.  In total hip and knee arthroplasty, several large retrospective studies have shown that, when compared with general anesthesia, neuraxial anesthesia is associated with a reduction in  patient mortality  major morbidity (e.g. pulmonary complications, transfusion requirements) and  economic outcomes such as length of hospital stay.
  • 27.
    Prospects: Acute Perioperative PainService  Established as a relatively new but important concept and service in clinical patient care.  There is growing evidence of the multiple benefits of a dedicatedAPPS, especially pertaining to patients at higher risk of poorly controlled postoperative pain.  Importance of the perioperative pain management continuity of care, consisting of preoperative pain evaluations and post-discharge follow-up in an outpatient pain management setting, in coordination with the primary teams.
  • 28.
    Prospects  Acute PerioperativePain Service  The APPS is becoming the clinical standard of care for managing postoperative pain, and its role continues to expand worldwide
  • 29.
    Prospects: Training &Academics  Residents continue to report limited peripheral nerve block experience during the course of standard residency training  Practice of regional anesthesia has expanded over the past 2 decades, particularly with regards to continuous epidural analgesia and perineural catheter techniques.
  • 30.
    Prospects  Training  Thebenefits of regional anesthesia with respect to postoperative analgesia, decreased nausea and vomiting, and patient safety is increasingly realized by surgeons as well.  However, resident training in regional anesthesia and analgesia techniques may not be fully concordant with the perception of increased demand.
  • 31.
    Prospects  Training  Thereis a need to develop method of increasing exposure of residents to peripheral nerve block procedures.  To formulate guidelines for regional anesthesia fellowship training and develop post fellowship programs for regional anesthesia training.
  • 32.