Downloaded 14 times
![21
JRuby
list = ["Rod", "Neeta", "Eric", "Missy"]
shorts = list.find_all { |name| name.size <= 4 }
puts shorts.size
shorts.each { |name| puts name }
-> 2
-> Rod
Eric
Groovy
list = ["Rod", "Neeta", "Eric", "Missy"]
shorts = list.findAll { name -> name.size() <= 4 }
println shorts.size
shorts.each { name -> println name }
-> 2
-> Rod
Eric](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/real-timesearchingofbigdatawithsolrandhadoop-151030144524-lva1-app6892/75/Real-time-searching-of-big-data-with-Solr-and-Hadoop-21-2048.jpg)
Uploaded byRogue Wave Software
Real-time searching of big data with Solr and Hadoop
The document discusses the integration of Solr and Hadoop for real-time searching of big data, highlighting the limitations of traditional relational databases and emphasizing the need for scalable solutions. It details components like HBase, Solr, and their operational intricacies, including sharding, replication, and performance optimization techniques. The author also contrasts on-premise hardware versus cloud solutions, showcasing cost considerations and system administration challenges in managing big data environments.
More Related Content
Similar to Real-time searching of big data with Solr and Hadoop
More from Rogue Wave Software
Real-time searching of big data with Solr and Hadoop
- 1. 1 Real-time searching of bigdata with Solr and Hadoop Rod Cope, CTO
- 2. 2 • Introduction • Theproblem • The solution • Top 10 lessons • Final thoughts • Q&A
- 3. 3 Rod Cope, CTO RogueWave Software
- 4. 4 • “Big data” –All the world’s open source software – Metadata, code, indexes – Individual tables contain many terabytes – Relational databases aren’t scale-free • Growing every day • Need real-time random access to all data • Long-running and complex analysis jobs
- 5. 5 • Hadoop, HBase,and Solr – Hadoop – distributed file system, map/reduce – HBase – “NoSQL” data store – column-oriented – Solr – search server based on Lucene – All are scalable, flexible, fast, well-supported, and used in production environments • And a supporting cast of thousands… – Stargate, MySQL, Rails, Redis, Resque, – Nginx, Unicorn, HAProxy, Memcached, – Ruby, JRuby, CentOS, …
- 6. 6 Internet Application LANData LAN *Caching and load balancing not shown
- 7. 7 • HBase NoSQL – Think hash table, not relational database • How do find my data if primary key won’t cut it? • Solr to the rescue – Very fast, highly scalable search server with built-in sharding and replication – based on Lucene – Dynamic schema, powerful query language, faceted search, accessible via simple REST-like web API w/XML, JSON, Ruby, and other data formats
- 8. 8 • Sharding – Queryany server – it executes the same query against all other servers in the group – Returns aggregated result to original caller • Async replication (slaves poll their masters) – Can use repeaters if replicating across data centers • OpenLogic – Solr farm, sharded, cross-replicated, fronted with HAProxy • Load balanced writes across masters, reads across masters and slaves • Be careful not to over-commit – Billions of lines of code in HBase, all indexed in Solr for real-time search in multiple ways – Over 20 Solr fields indexed per source file
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15. 15 • Experiment withdifferent Solr merge factors – During huge loads, it can help to use a higher factor for load performance • Minimize index manipulation gymnastics • Start with something like 25 – When you’re done with the massive initial load/import, turn it back down for search performance • Minimize number of queries • Start with something like 5 • Note that a small merge factor will hurt indexing performance if you need to do massive loads on a frequent basis or continuous indexing
- 16. 16 • Test yourwrite-focused load balancing – Look for large skews in Solr index size – Note: you may have to commit, optimize, write again, and commit before you can really tell • Make sure your replication slaves are keeping up – Using identical hardware helps – If index directories don’t look the same, something is wrong
- 17. 17 • Don’t committo Solr too frequently – It’s easy to auto-commit or commit after every record – Doing this 100’s of times per second will take Solr down, especially if you have serious warm up queries configured • Avoid putting large values in HBase (> 5MB) – Works, but may cause instability and/or performance issues – Rows and columns are cheap, so use more of them instead
- 18. 18 • Don’t usea single machine to load the cluster – You might not live long enough to see it finish • At OpenLogic, we spread raw source data across many machines and hard drives via NFS – Be very careful with NFS configuration – can hang machines • Load data into HBase via Hadoop map/reduce jobs – Turn off WAL for much better performance • put.setWriteToWAL(false) – Index in Solr as you go • Good way to test your load balancing write schemes and replication set up – This will find your weak spots!
- 19. 19 • Writing dataloading jobs can be tedious • Scripting is faster and easier than writing Java • Great for system administration tasks, testing • Standard HBase shell is based on JRuby • Very easy Map/Reduce jobs with J/Ruby and Wukong • Used heavily at OpenLogic – Productivity of Ruby – Power of Java Virtual Machine – Ruby on Rails, Hadoop integration, GUI clients
- 20.
- 21. 21 JRuby list = ["Rod","Neeta", "Eric", "Missy"] shorts = list.find_all { |name| name.size <= 4 } puts shorts.size shorts.each { |name| puts name } -> 2 -> Rod Eric Groovy list = ["Rod", "Neeta", "Eric", "Missy"] shorts = list.findAll { name -> name.size() <= 4 } println shorts.size shorts.each { name -> println name } -> 2 -> Rod Eric
- 22. 22 • Hadoop – SPOFaround Namenode, append functionality • HBase – Backup, replication, and indexing solutions in flux • Solr – Several competing solutions around cloud-like scalability and fault-tolerance, including ZooKeeper and Hadoop integration – No clear winner, none quite ready for production
- 23. 23 • Many movingparts – It’s easy to let typos slip through – Consider automated configuration via Chef, Puppet, or similar • Pay attention to the details – Operating system – max open files, sockets, and other limits – Hadoop and HBase configuration • http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#trouble – Solr merge factor and norms • Don’t starve HBase or Solr for memory – Swapping will cripple your system
- 24. 24 • “Commodity hardware”!= 3 year old desktop • Dual quad-core, 32GB RAM, 4+ disks • Don’t bother with RAID on Hadoop data disks – Be wary of non-enterprise drives • Expect ugly hardware issues at some point
- 25. 25 • Environment – 100+CPU cores – 100+ Terabytes of disk – Machines don’t have identity – Add capacity by plugging in new machines • Why not Amazon EC2? – Great for computational bursts – Expensive for long-term storage of big data – Not yet consistent enough for mission-critical usage of HBase
- 26. 26 • Dual quad-coreand dual hex-core • Dell boxes • 32-64GB RAM – ECC (highly recommended by Google) • 6 x 2TB enterprise hard drives • RAID 1 on two of the drives – OS, Hadoop, HBase, Solr, NFS mounts (be careful!), job code, etc. – Key “source” data backups • Hadoop datanode gets remaining drives • Redundant enterprise switches • Dual- and quad-gigabit NIC’s
- 27. 27 • Amazon EC2 –EBS Storage • 100TB * $0.10/GB/month = $120k/year – Double Extra Large instances • 13 EC2 compute units, 34.2GB RAM • 20 instances * $1.00/hr * 8,760 hrs/yr = $175k/year • 3 year reserved instances – 20 * 4k = $80k up front to reserve – (20 * $0.34/hr * 8,760 hrs/yr * 3 yrs) / 3 = $86k/year to operate – Totals for 20 virtual machines • 1st year cost: $120k + $80k + $86k = $286k • 2nd & 3rd year costs: $120k + $86k = $206k • Average: ($286k + $206k + $206k) / 3 = $232k/year
- 28. 28 • Buy yourown – 20 * Dell servers w/12 CPU cores, 32GB RAM, 5 TB disk = $160k • Over 33 EC2 compute units each – Total: $53k/year (amortized over 3 years)
- 29. 29 • Amazon EC2 –20 instances * 13 EC2 compute units = 260 EC2 compute units – Cost: $232k/year • Buy your own – 20 machines * 33 EC2 compute units = 660 EC2 compute units – Cost: $53k/year – Does not include hosting and maintenance costs • Don’t think system administration goes away – You still “own” all the instances – monitoring, debugging, support
- 30. 30 • Hardware – Powersupplies, hard drives • Operating System – Kernel panics, zombie processes, dropped packets • Software Servers – Hadoop datanodes, HBase regionservers, Stargate servers, Solr servers • Your Code and Data – Stray map/reduce jobs, strange corner cases in your data leading to program failures
- 31.
- 32. 32 • Hadoop, HBase,Solr • Apache, Tomcat, ZooKeeper, HAProxy • Stargate, JRuby, Lucene, Jetty, HSQLDB, Geronimo • Apache Commons, JUnit • CentOS • Dozens more • Too expensive to build or buy everything
- 33. 33 • You canhost big data in your own private cloud – Tools are available today that didn’t exist a few years ago – Fast to prototype – production readiness takes time – Expect to invest in training and support • Hbase and Solr are fast – 100+ random queries/sec per instance – Give them memory and stand back • Hbase Scales, Solr scales (to a point) – Don’t worry about out-growing a few machines – Do worry about out-growing a rack of Solr instances • Look for ways to partition your data other than “automatic” sharding
- 34.
- 35. 35 Rod Cope rod.cope@roguewave.com See usin action: www.roguewave.com
- 36.