Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (11)
Similar to Rati kiria / Philips
Similar to Rati kiria / Philips (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Rati kiria / Philips
- 1. Annual Results 2004 • January 27, 2005
- 2. • Founded in November 1998, based in Brisbane, CA • Picture Archiving and Communications Systems (PACS) • A unique technology and service model • 50 % on-going and projected growth rate • 11% unit share of new PACS installations in 2004 in North America • #1 in Customer Satisfaction 2003, 2004 and mid-2005 • >200 installations in >100 healthcare institutions in North America 06-July-05 2
- 3. Philips Medical Systems in 2004 Imaging Systems EUR 2.8 bln Customer Services Information and Nuclear Medicine EUR 1.6 bln Monitoring Solutions CT EUR 1.5 bln MR Consultancy Medical IT PET Clinical services Patient Monitoring Ultrasound Asset management and Cardiac Devices X-Ray Maintenance Document services & Repair 06-July-05 3
- 4. Focus on the Care Cycle Information & Operating room Operating room Decision support Intensive Intensive Monitoring Monitoring Care unit Care unit Imaging Monitoring Imaging Treatment Monitoring Diagnostics Step down Step down Diagnostics Diagnostics facility Imaging facility Imaging Monitoring Monitoring Follow Up Pre-Hospital/ Pre-Hospital/ Ambulance Home Home Ambulance Monitoring Monitoring Monitoring Monitoring 06-July-05 4
- 5. Why ? • Unique – and proven - customer experience - #1 by KLAS in 2003, 2004 and mid-2005 • Unique Technology with access to full detail of clinical images anytime, anywhere – faster and at lower cost • Strong team with strong leaders who are eager to multiply the business within Philips • A shared vision of the future • Strong market, clinical and technology synergies • Strong combined market position #2 to start with 06-July-05 5
- 6. Philips Radiology IT Solutions EasyRIS Philips iSite Philips iSite ViewForum & Radiology Enterprise Advanced Clinical Xtenity RIS (USA) PACS distribution Applications Workflow Web-enabled Scheduling, management, cost-effective Multi-modality worklist image review information image viewing management and reporting distribution and processing A comprehensive radiology IT portfolio 06-July-05 6
- 7. Benefits of PACS Management of radiology: Radiologist: • Cost reduction • Increase productivity • More examinations per modality • More accurate diagnostics • Better service to referring physicians • Less disturbance by referring physicians • Standardization of work processes • Handling of MR and CT examinations • Control of workflow • Tele-consult colleagues • Automated billing • Work from home • Management information 06-July-05 7
- 8. Philips’ and Stentors’ combined worldwide presence and installed base North America, Europe and Japan Account for 80% of the total market Over 1600 PACS systems for Radiology and/or Cardiology installed worldwide! Dots give indication of installation of one or more Radio and/or Cardio PACS system 06-July-05 8
- 9. Healthcare IT Market IT in Healthcare = Infrastructure IT + Healthcare IT Healthcare IT = Enterprise IT + Clinical IT/PACS Consulting Healthcare IT is: • very fragmented (1200+ companies) Infrastructure IT • a $ 26 Bln market (USA 70%) Enterprise IT • with an average growth 11%/year Clinical IT/PACS Imaging Consulting: Business Processing Re-engineering (BPR), Institutional Transformation: & Monitors Alliance Programs Infrastructure IT: IT Hardware, Op. Systems, Networks, Office Desktop. Outsourced infrastructure: Reseller agreements Enterprise IT: Clinical Data Repository, CPOE, EMR and $2.4 Bln Departmental IT: RIS, CVIS, etc.: Philips Xtenity powered by Epic $23.8 Bln $35.7 Bln Clinical IT/PACS: PACS, Workstations, Clinical Applications, Decision Support, Monitoring related IT Source: CapGemini U.S., DeLoitte, Gartner products: Many Philips Medical Systems products Total IT in Healthcare $62 Bln (USA 50%) in 2004 06-July-05 9
- 10. Global Radiology and Cardiology PACS market Global PACS market 2004E: $ 1.8 Bln Growth 9% per year US Market share Radiology PACS 2004 in units 26% 7% 6% GE Philips+Stentor Siemens 7% 18% Fuji Agfa 8% McKesson Emageon 9% 10% Amicas 9% Others Source: Frost & Sullivan 2004 06-July-05 10
- 11. Strengthen our competitive position By completing our portfolio Stentor iSite Clinical IT Enterprise IT PACS Imaging Monitoring GE Siemens Film Companies HIT Companies Niche Players Philips BEST in CLASS in all major categories 06-July-05 11
- 12. iSite fits in the complete Vequion portfolio Intgris Allura PACS Xtenity Imaging Modalities, Clinical IT Enterprise IT Monitoring PACS Powered by Epic Guaranteeing a consistent UI and full interoperability 06-July-05 12
- 13. Annual Results 2004 • January 27, 2005
Editor's Notes
- The Care cycle describes the continuum of care along the main dimensions of diagnosis, treatment and Follow-up. Today we occupy many positions along the cycle; from monitoring in the ambulance through diagnostic Imaging and monitoring and defibrillation in the OR and ICU to the home. By this focus we have build up deep and long standing relationships with the physicians, nurses and technicians who deliver care on a day-to-day basis. These close relationships have helped us understand the clinical practice and design the products which are best fit for the job. This is how we are helping our customer to deliver clinical excellence and how we are focusing on making our customer successful. If anything, here leis the difference between ourselves and the other companies in the field. As we move forward and weigh accelerated growth options and acquisition opportunities, each of these needs to add to our position along the care cycle, and to build on the strengths we already have. In this way we do not have to copy competitors or do acquisitions in vaguely related areas, but build value for our customers by expanding on what we are already doing. Estimated medical technology sizes per care element. Include sthe E 80 bln IT in Healthcare which is captive in hospitals.
- Centagon: zoals afgesproken een visual die de 3 stappen laat zien: Department centric: elke department heeft zijn eigen kijk op de patient, patient info is niet gedeeld Physician centric: situatie verbetert: betere communicatie tussen departments/docters Patient centric: de patient staat centraal, alle departmens/doctors hebben dezelfde patient info en kijk op de patient