The student made several changes to their magazine based on audience feedback. They received feedback that the main title was too large, so they made it slightly smaller to allow space for an additional sell line. The audience also suggested using a medium close-up photo of the model rather than a wide shot, so the student retook photos using a closer shot. These changes improved the front cover design and made it more appealing for the target audience.

1. Question 5 - How did you
attract/address your audience?
Highlight how you made changes to
your rough cut in light of audience
feedback

2. In this part I will highlight how I made changes to my rough cut magazine in the light of
my target audience. I will compare my rough cut magazine with my final product,
annotating how I have changed/improved my rough-cut magazine.
Rough cut magazine

3. This is my rough-cut magazine compared to my final product (after using audience
feedback to make improvements).
The audience also gave
feedback on my sell
lines, they suggested that I
add another sell line to fill
in the empty space that was
left over from when I made
the main title slightly
smaller.
Secondly the audience
suggested that I make the
main title of my magazine
slightly smaller because
they felt that it took up to
much of the front cover. I
agreed with this feedback
and it also allowed me to
add another sell line onto
my front cover.
Firstly the audience suggested that the image should be
a medium close up rather than a wide shot of model. To Overall I think that from using my target
change my magazine from using the audience feedback audiences feedback it has improved my front
I re-took some photo’s and took some medium close up cover and it will be more appealing to my
photos of my model. I agree with the audience target audience.
feedback, I think this photo improves the overall front
cover and gives it more of a rock/indie feel.