The document provides a summary of findings from a field survey conducted by Access to Justice on the level of compliance with Lagos State's Administration of Criminal Justice Law of 2011. Key findings include:
1) There is low awareness of the law's provisions, with only 29% of police officers familiar with it.
2) Little change has occurred in arrest practices and procedures. Police do not notify magistrates of arrests as required.
3) Provisions around bail, pre-trial detention, and confessional statements remain unenforced.
4) Non-custodial sentencing is underutilized. The reforms have not achieved their goals due to lack of implementation by law enforcement. Recommendations include training and awareness campaigns
Da to lodge human rights complaint against saps and nfsl over dna backlogSABC News
The Democratic Alliance says it will lodge a complaint with the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) against the police and the National Forensic Science Laboratory (NFSL) over a backlog in DNA testing at the NFSL.
Da to lodge human rights complaint against saps and nfsl over dna backlogSABC News
The Democratic Alliance says it will lodge a complaint with the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) against the police and the National Forensic Science Laboratory (NFSL) over a backlog in DNA testing at the NFSL.
I have presented this slide before my course teacher. Now I am publishing this slide for all Students in Bangladesh which may help them for their study.
Transition énergétique citoyenne, 8 propositions pour la développer !elab ecosoc
Le Labo de l'ESS et son groupe d'experts ont formulé 8 propositions pour permettre l'essor de la transition énergétique citoyenne. Enercoop, Energie partagée, Fermes de Figeac étaient présents lors de l'événement de réstitution. Corinne Lepage et Pascal Canfin ont donné leur éclairage. Michel Rocard a fait l'honneur de sa présence.
Mohamed Sayed Mohamed Ali
Project Structure Engineer at rmc consulting Engineer
4 years experience in Designing of Residential Building, Halls, Tanks, Silos, and RC Bridges
I have presented this slide before my course teacher. Now I am publishing this slide for all Students in Bangladesh which may help them for their study.
Transition énergétique citoyenne, 8 propositions pour la développer !elab ecosoc
Le Labo de l'ESS et son groupe d'experts ont formulé 8 propositions pour permettre l'essor de la transition énergétique citoyenne. Enercoop, Energie partagée, Fermes de Figeac étaient présents lors de l'événement de réstitution. Corinne Lepage et Pascal Canfin ont donné leur éclairage. Michel Rocard a fait l'honneur de sa présence.
Mohamed Sayed Mohamed Ali
Project Structure Engineer at rmc consulting Engineer
4 years experience in Designing of Residential Building, Halls, Tanks, Silos, and RC Bridges
The Responsibility of the Judicial Police Officer under Cameroonian Lawijtsrd
This paper looks at the legal and institutional framework and the procedural mechanisms involved in rendering judicial police officers accountable for offences committed while performing their duties. The difficulties involved in getting a judicial police officer answer for his criminal misconduct will be of particular interest. Challenges facing the criminal trial process prior to and after the enactment of a single criminal procedure code in Cameroon are also examined and recommendation offered with the view to enhancing the criminal trial of judicial police officers in Cameroon without hampering the smooth running of their duties. Ngatchou Toto Carles "The Responsibility of the Judicial Police Officer under Cameroonian Law" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-4 | Issue-1 , December 2019, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd29731.pdf Paper URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/management/law-and-management/29731/the-responsibility-of-the-judicial-police-officer-under-cameroonian-law/ngatchou-toto-carles
BCJ 2002, Theory and Practices of Corrections 1 Cour.docxJASS44
BCJ 2002, Theory and Practices of Corrections 1
Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I
Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:
1. Define terms related to corrections.
1.1 Define all relevant vocabulary related to the correctional system within
the unit.
1.2 Define and understand professionalism in corrections.
2. Assess the purpose, implementation, and effectiveness of corrections.
2.1 Identify standards, training, and skills of correctional officers.
2.2 Identify what organizations exist that set standards in the field.
3. Trace the historical evolution of the correctional system.
3.1 Identify key people that have helped to reform the correctional system
over time.
Unit Lesson
The statistics currently indicate that crime has declined since the 1990s; however, the
number of people incarcerated or under some sort of correctional supervision has
continued to steadily increase. There are four reasons behind this phenomenon:
1. The tough on crime laws like three-strikes-laws have kept repeat offenders
incarcerated for extended lengths of time.
2. The War on Drugs has led to many arrests and convictions that have
increased incarcerated populations in every jurisdiction in the country.
3. Parole authorities now fear liability for inmates released early that re-offend.
4. Those that are out of jail and prison and on probation are more likely to violate
probation.
As the incarceration rate rises, it is important to realize that employment rates of
correctional officers and support staff will also continue to rise. In 1950 there were
approximately 27,000 people employed as correctional officers. Current statistics
indicate that number is now at 490,000 correctional officers. If you were to factor in the
increase in juvenile detention centers, probation and parole officers, administrators,
and other professionals in the correctional field, the number jumps to 748,000 people
employed in the correctional field (Schmalleger & Smykla, 2015).
Corrections Place in the Criminal Justice System
Once a person is arrested, he or she is booked into jail. Law enforcement must then
present evidence to the prosecutor and the decision will be made to file formal
charges or release the person from custody. If a person is charged with a crime, he or
she must go before a judge in an initial, or first, appearance in court. At this time he or
Reading
Assignment
Chapter 1:
Corrections: An Overview
Chapter 2:
Punishments: A Brief
History
Learning Activities
(Non-Graded)
See information below.
Key Terms
1. Adjudication
2. Arraignment
3. Community
corrections
4. Corporal punishment
5. Cost-benefit analysis
6. Criminal law
7. Evidence-based
corrections
8. Hedonistic calculus
9. Institutional
corrections
10. Mores
11. Nolo contendere
12. Noninstitutional
corrections
13. Penal law
14. Sustainable justice
15. Utilitarianism
...
IMPLEMENTATION OF DIVERSION IN THE SETTLEMENT OF CRIMINAL CASES CHILDREN IN C...AJHSSR Journal
ABSTRACT: This study investigates the implementation of diversion by the Indonesian National Police as a
strategy for resolving cases involving children in conflict with the law. One of the challenges encountered by
investigators from the Indonesian National Police (POLRI) pertains to the utilization of discretionary authority
in their investigative processes. The present study investigates the implementation of diversion by the
Indonesian National Police as a means of resolving cases involving children in conflict with the law. One of the
challenges encountered by investigators from the Indonesian National Police (POLRI) pertains to the exercise of
discretionary power in resolving cases involving juvenile offenders who face the possibility of imprisonment
exceeding a duration of seven years. This issue arises from the provisions outlined in Law Number 11 of 2012,
which governs the Juvenile Criminal Justice System in Indonesia. According to this law, the diversion of
juvenile offenses is mandated only for those offenses that carry a maximum prison sentence of less than seven
years. The present study employs a normative-empirical legal methodology, drawing upon primary and
secondary sources. The process of data collection involved conducting interviews and conducting a study of
relevant literature in libraries. The data were subjected to qualitative normative analysis techniques. This study
applies the theory of restorative justice as a grand theory, justice theory as a middle-range theory, and legal
protection theory as an applied theory to analyze the provided data. The findings of the study indicate that the
implementation of diversion during the investigation phase lacks effectiveness and efficiency in adhering to the
principles of justice, namely simplicity, expediency, and cost-effectiveness. This is primarily attributed to the
bureaucratic nature of the diversion procedure, as well as the complex and administratively challenging
mediation process, which involves numerous elements. Furthermore, it is worth noting that the Indonesian
National Police (POLRI) investigators possess the ability to pursue diversion as a course of action in cases
involving juvenile offenses. This particular measure is applicable even in situations where the offense carries a
potential prison sentence exceeding seven years. The discretionary authority exercised by law enforcement
officials in this regard is justified by the absence of explicit provisions within the SPPA Law that explicitly
prohibit the application of diversion for criminal acts that are punishable by imprisonment for more than seven
years. However, the utilization of police discretion in this particular scenario must adhere to the restrictions,
prerequisites, or standards for implementing restorative justice as outlined in the Chief of Police Circular
Number SE/8/VII/2018, which pertains to the utilization of restorative justice in the resolution of criminal cases.
iv
chapter
9
the arreSt DecISIOn
Simulation Studies
Police Bias in the Arrest Decision
Racism
Early Studies
Later Studies
Sexism
Early Studies
Later Studies
Biased-Based Policing
A Critique
Controlling Police Officer Discretion
The Locus of Change
The Policy Formulation Process
Summary
Review Questions
Discussion Questions
Selected Internet Sites
References
275
chapter OutlIne
Key Terms
Learning Objectives
Introduction
Full versus Selective Enforcement
Reasons for Police Discretion
Unclear Laws
Nuisance Behavior
Broad Statutes
Moral Standards
Outdated Laws
Defining Discretion
Handling Calls for Service
Police Operators and Dispatchers
Handling Calls in the Field
Observational Studies
Controlling the Call
Putting It Together
The Arrest Decision
Field Encounter Studies
R
O
D
D
Y
,
A
N
T
H
O
N
Y
6
9
7
3
B
U
276 Part 3 On the Streets
pretextual stop
proactive policing
quota
racial profiling
reactive policing
selective enforcement
simulation
unarticulated improvisation
Key termS
chivalry hypothesis
coercive regulation
definitional regulation
discretion
field observation
full enforcement
imperative regulation
masculinity hypothesis
policy
• Comment on why some people call
police telephone operators and
dispatchers the “gatekeepers to the
police system;”
• Talk about how police officers use
definition, imperative, and coercive
regulation;
• Explain how legal and non-legal vari-
ables influence the decision to arrest
a person;
• Debate whether racism and sexism
bias the arrest decision
• Critique the arrest literature that
relies heavily on just social variables;
• Review the policy formulation pro-
cess; and,
• Discuss the importance of police for
police discretion.
learnIng ObjectIveS
The study of this chapter will enable
you to:
• Explain why arrest is such a monu-
mental power;
• Understand why full enforcement
is a myth;
• Outline what selective enforcement
means;
• Appreciate what unarticulated
improvisation is;
• List two objections to unarticulated
improvisation
• Define police discretion;
• Appreciate why the decision not to
arrest is important;
• Give five reasons why police
discretion exists
• Differentiate discretion from
discrimination;
• Contrast proactive with reactive
policing;
R
O
D
D
Y
,
A
N
T
H
O
N
Y
6
9
7
3
B
U
Chapter 9 the arrest Decision 277
Introduction
One of the more monumental powers a police officer can exercise is an arrest. Why
do we refer to arrest powers as being monumental? Very simply, being arrested car-
ries a negative image that taints the arrestee for years to come. One classic example of
this adverse impact comes from an ingenious field experiment. Schwartz and Skolnick
(1962) designed a resumé for four fictitious job seekers. While all the pertinent details
were the same for each candidate, the criminal records varied. The first application con-
tained no mention of an arrest history.
BCJ 2002, Theory and Practices of Corrections 1 Cour.docxikirkton
BCJ 2002, Theory and Practices of Corrections 1
Course Learning Outcomes for Unit II
Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:
1. Define terms related to corrections.
1.1 Define terms related to sentencing and diversion.
2. Assess the purpose, implementations, and effectiveness of corrections.
2.1 Identify the seven goals of criminal sentencing.
2.2 Examine the concept of diversion.
2.3 Analyze the concept of probation and the job of the probation officer.
8. Appraise the legal rights of inmates and the use of capital punishment.
8.1 Discuss various landmark cases referenced in the book and how they
apply to the current correctional system.
8.2 Match various landmark cases to their outcomes.
Unit Lesson
The general public has an expectation that those people that cannot conform to the
basic rules and law of society be punished for their lack of regard for the law. The
concept of punishment versus reform is one that has been constantly debated for
hundreds of years. In this unit, we discuss the goals of sentencing as they relate to
punishment.
There are seven goals of punishment that you need to understand in this unit. They
are as follows:
revenge,
retribution,
just deserts,
deterrence,
incapacitation,
rehabilitation or reformation, and
restoration.
There are also five sentencing options available to the offender:
fines and other monetary sanctions,
probation,
intermediate sanctions,
incarceration, and
death penalty.
One question we need to ask ourselves is, “do the five sentencing options fit into the
seven goals of punishment?” The death penalty does provide revenge, but does it
Reading
Assignment
Chapter 3:
Sentencing: To Punish or
to Reform?
Chapter 4:
Diversion and Probation:
How Most Offenders are
Punished
Learning Activities
(Non-Graded)
See information below.
Key Terms
1. Absconding
2. Conditional diversion
3. Correctional
econometrics
4. Determinate
sentencing
5. Diversion
6. Equity
7. Just deserts
8. Mandatory
sentencing
9. Restorative justice
10. Revocation hearing
11. Social debt
12. Unconditional
diversion
UNIT II STUDY GUIDE
Sentencing, Diversion, and Sanctions
BCJ 2002, Theory and Practices of Corrections 2
provide deterrence? Most would say that it does not provide any deterrence at all.
People are still committing crimes that justify the use of the death penalty in every
state in the country. When we look further into criminal activity like sex crimes, or more
specifically Internet sting operations where law enforcement makes contact with
individuals seeking to engage in sexual acts with minors, we see that the threat of
incarceration and years of probation have no effect on the goals of deterrence or
reform. The shame associated with being displayed on the television show “To Catch
a Predator” would seem to provide some sort ...
This paper is about fact-finding procedures in Chinese criminal trials. It traces general rules setting out fact-finding procedures, and describes the roles that various legal actors that should play to ensure that they are followed properly. It will further examine how Chinese law balances the duty to determine the truth and the principle of protecting individual rights from potential infringements in criminal cases. Based on the conflicts between truth-seeking and human rights protection, this paper will conclude by discussing limitations in Chinese fact-finding procedures and will suggest how they can be mended.
Public Presentation Of Findings Of A Field Survey On The State Of Compliance With The Lagos State
1. Public PresentationOf Findings Of A FieldSurvey On The State Of Compliance
With The Lagos State
On behalf of the AccesstoJustice,Iwarmlywelcome youall tothispublicpresentationof findings of
our fieldresearchonthe state of compliance with the LagosState Administration of Criminal Justice
Law, 2011.
With a view to enhancing better respect for the rights of citizens by the police in the law
enforcement process, as well as ensuring speedier dispensation of criminal justice, Lagos State
passed a new Administration of Criminal Justice Law in 2011 which was intended to repeal and
replace the oldCriminal Procedure Law of Lagos State, 2004. Some of the daunting problems within
the administration of criminal justice which the new law sought to regulate include
The hauling of crime suspects into court before investigations.
The excessive timetakentoconclude crime investigationsandconsequential remandof suspects
pending conclusion of investigation or trial;
The weakrecords-keepingsystemsfromwhichcasesbeingtriedaccidentallybutoccasionallyslip
out into oblivion, and
Poor judicial oversight over “remand” detention leading to prolonged pre-trial or under-trial
imprisonment of criminal defendant.
The practice of extractingconfessional statements from crime suspects by means of torture and
other oppressive methods of interrogation
The reformsinitiatedbythe newlaw,the Administrationof Criminal Justice Law of Lagos State, 2011
(otherwise referred to as “ACJL”) include:
The provision of substantial safeguards against the use of torture by the police in the
interrogationprocess, byrequiringthatconfessionalstatements by crime suspects must only be
admissibleinevidence if theywere video-recordedor taken in the presence of counsel (lawyer)
to the accused person.
The creationof an oversightsystem(runandregulatedby magistrates) for remand detention to
insure that persons on remand are not, by some default, remain on prolonged and seemingly
interminable incarceration.
The codification of the rights of the crime suspect to remain silent at police interrogation until
after consultation with his counsel -- commonly referred to as the “Miranda” rights and
2. The liberalizingof sentencingorpunishmenttoinclude non-custodialsentencinglike community
services.
These reformswere expected,amongother things, to ease prison congestion, end the abuse of the
remandsystem,improve the delivery of criminal justice services by the courts, enhance capacity of
lawenforcementofficialstoact responsibly,accountablyandprofessionally,aswell as ensure better
safeguards for the rights of persons who are processed through criminal justice system.
Access to Justice with the support of DFID funded J4A Programme conducted a three (3) months
research, from May 2013 to July 2013, to ascertain the level of awareness, compliance,
implementation and enforcement of the ACJ by law enforcement officials – i.e the Police and the
Magistrates. The overriding objective of the research is to bridge the gaps militating against the
understandingandeffective implementationof the reformsthroughidentificationof impedimentsto
the implementation of the Law and preferring recommendations that can plug these gaps. This
presentation highlights key findings of the research.
The Findings
The study revealsthataftersix yearsfromthe time the reformchangeswere firstenactedintolaw in
2007, and two years after the more recent amendments to the Administration of Criminal Justice
Law of 2011,the creative push for reform in Lagos State and the lofty goals and the outcomes
envisaged by the legislation have not been achieved till this time. Our research validates the
experience of many:notmuchhas changedwithinpolice institutionsandeveninthe courtssince the
introductionof ACJ law. Notable amongst the causes for this set-back is the pervasive ignorance of
relevantprovisionsof thisnewlawbyinstitutions directly obligated by the laws – the police (or law
enforcementagencies).FromAJ’sfindings,only29% of police officersinLagosState are familiar with
the ACJ Law 2011 (as amended) or have received any formal training on the provisions of the Law.
Specifically, our findings show that:
Over-sighting Police Detention
Little change hasoccurred with regard to reforms relating to arrest practices and procedures by law
enforcementgroups.Magistratesunanimously report that the police do not usually inform them of
cases of persons who are arrested and kept in police custody without being offered bail, or of
personswhoare arrestedwithoutawarrant and are detainedwithout any charges brought to court.
Corroborating this, 92% of police officers interviewed indicated that they do not notify district
magistratesof casesof personsarrested.Indeed,70% of the police officersinterviewedreportedthat
theyare notaware of thisrequirementof the law. 40% of the police officersaddedthatthere are no
existingtemplatesor forms provided in the Law which can serve as a guide for such notifications to
guide them in fulfilling this requirement.
3. Regulating Arrest Practices and Procedures
The research establishes that little change has occurred with regard to reforms relating to arrest
practicesand proceduresbylawenforcementgroups. The law providesthatuponarrestthere should
be notification of the cause of arrest. However 65% of police officers reported that they usually
informsuspectsof the cause of arrest only at the point of detention after the suspect arrives at the
police station.96%of sampledinmatesand92% of the sampledlawyersreportedthatpolice officers
do not inform arrested persons of their rights to apply for bail or free legal representation as
required by the law nor do police officers provide any facilities for arrested persons to obtain such
services
Bail Procedures
The findingsindicate thatthere have beennoreal improvementsinthe practice of bail in Lagos State
since the commencement of the ACJ Law. 75% of the lawyers and 89% of the prison inmates
interviewedstatedthatthe police donotrelease detainedsuspects on bail where it is impractical to
bring such suspects to court within 24 hours. Still in connection with bail, 9% of police officers
interviewedstill maintainthe practice of notacceptingwomenassuretieswhen granting police bail.
Pre-trial Detention and Speedy Trial
Sadly, much unjustified time continues to be wasted between the filing of information or charges
against suspects and the eventual trial of such suspects who are typically left to languish under
gruelingdetentionorprisonconditions.55% of lawyersreport that many of the magistrates in Lagos
State do not comply with the oversight safeguards enshrined in the ACJ Law concerning sixty days
adjournments with respect to persons detained under remand orders. The failure to exercise
adequate oversightoverremanddetentionshasalsonegativelyimpactedprisondemographics.As at
the time of this research, the Medium Prison, Kirikiri with a capacity of 1, 700 inmates, held 2,592
inmates out of which 2, 437 were awaiting trial inmates otherwise termed as remand prisoners.
Similarly the Medium Prison, Badagry with a total capacity of 160 inmates, is home to 509 inmates
out of which 204 were remand prisoners. Finally, the Medium Prison Ikoyi, with an 800 inmate
capacity, houses 1847 inmates, out of which 1, 709 were remand prisoners.
Taking Confessional Statements
Provisions relating to the taking of confessional statements of suspects have remained grossly
ignoredbythe police andunenforcedbymagistrates.Besides safeguarding the constitutional rights
of suspects,these provisionscouldalsohave eased concerns over the voluntariness of confessional
statements and reduced the frequency of attacks on those statements. Virtually all those
interviewed – police officers, prison inmates and Lawyers were all nearly unanimous in saying that
police officers do not make video recordings when obtaining statements from arrested persons,
4. neither do they alternatively make sure that a lawyer is present first before embarking on an
interrogation or obtaining a statement from an arrested person.
Non-Custodial Sentencing
The perennial problem of prison congestion is no doubt worsened by the discernible failure of
magistrates to embrace forms of non-custodial sentencing as an alternative to imprisonment
provided under the Law. 82% of Magistrates reports that they employ community sentence orders
for only the most minor offences – such as the theft of mobile phones - particularly where stolen
items have been recovered, or traffic or environmental offences. However, 18% of magistrates
reportedthatdue to the challengesof enforcement, they do not make community service orders at
all but would rather impose fines on persons convicted of minor offences or first time offenders.
CONCLUSION
Have the reforms introduced by Lagos State changed the landscape of criminal justice
administration?The answeratthistime isno: theyhave not.Notbecause theylackthe powerto,not
because they come short in any known respects but because they have mostly been ignored or are
yet to be taken seriously by those whom they bind. The basic inference, from this research, is that
lawenforcementinstitutionsinLagosState have fallenshortinimplementingthe reformsintroduced
by the ACJ law. This will need to change for the reforms to stand a chance of achieving its goals or
producing some impact in the State.
Our recommendations therefore include creating more awareness about the provisions of the law
and providing training on the reforms brought about the law amongst principal stakeholders,
particularly amongst law enforcement communities. To this end Access to Justice is collaborating
with the Lagos State Ministry of Justice to conduct series of training workshops on the ACJ Law for
boththe Magistratesand the Police. The first of these workshops, which is principally designed for
senior police officers, will take place sometime in early December, 2013
Thank you.