A guide to Central Texas public schools, private schools and higher education. Information about Austin schools, Round Rock schools, Lake Travis schools, Leander schools, Cedar Park schools, Pflugerville schools. To find Austin area homes by school district and individual school visit our website at http://austinhometeam.com/search-by-school/ Eric Peterson Real Estate Broker Austin Home Team Keller Williams Realty 12515-8 Research Blvd Ste 100 Austin, TX 78759 512-791-7473 eric@austinhometeam.com

2. School District Boundary Locator
Florence ISD
Jarrell ISD
T h e Te xa s E du c a t i o n Ag e n c y c o l l e c t s m a p s a n d l e g a l
d es c ri p ti o n s o f sc h o o l d i st ri c t b o u n da r i es u n d er
S e c t i o n 1 3 .0 1 0 of t h e Texa s E d u c at i o n C o d e .
Granger ISD
Liberty Hill ISD
S e ve r a l ye a r s a g o, t h e T E A wo r ke d w i t h t h e Tex a s
Le g i s l a t i v e C o u n c i l t o d i g i t i z e s c h o o l d i s t r i c t
b o u n d a r i e s . Th e a g e n c i e s u s e d t h e i n f o r m a t i o n
p r ov i d e d b y s c h o o l d i s t r i c t s i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h
c o u n t y - l ev e l D e p a r t m e n t o f Tr a n s po r t a t i o n ( Tx D OT )
m a p s to tra n sfe r th e b o u n d a ri e s f ro m p a p er to
c o m pu t e r.
G e o g r a p h i c d at a f o r s c h o o l s w a s c r e a t e d b y t h e
I n f o r m a t i o n Te c h n o l o g y D i vi s i o n t o e n h a n c e
T EA m a p p i n g a p pl i c a ti o n s a n d fo r g en e ra l
i n f o r m a t i o n p u r p o s e s . T h e s o u r c e o f t h e d at a i s
t h e Texa s E d u c at i o n D i r e c t o r y m a i n t a i n e d by T E A .
Georgetown ISD
Thrall ISD
Hutto ISD
Leander ISD
Taylor ISD
Round Rock ISD
Lago
Vista
ISD
Pflugerville ISD
Manor ISD
Lake Travis ISD
Coupland
ISD
Elgin ISD
Eanes ISD
McDade ISD
Dripping Springs ISD
Austin ISD
Del Valle ISD
Bastrop ISD
Hays CISD
Wimberley ISD
Smithville ISD
Lockhart ISD
San Marcos CISD
School District Snapshots 2012
Total Students
Attendance Rate
SAT Mean Total
ACT Mean Total
Austin
Student/Teacher Ratio
Revenue Per Pupil
86,124
94.9
1014
Bastrop
9,082
95.1
942
21.2
15
11,389
19.4
15.7
10,530
Del Valle
11,120
95.8
876
18.6
15.4
10,835
Dripping Springs
4,571
96.6
1142
25.5
16.4
11,215
Eanes
7,776
96.6
1214
27
14.3
11,555
Elgin
4,062
95.1
941
19
16.5
9,906
Florence
992
95.9
981
20.9
13.8
11,108
Georgetown
10,337
95.8
1042
21.8
13.2
10,622
Hays
15,868
95.8
952
20.3
15.8
10,233
Hutto
5,642
96.5
954
20.9
17
7,441
Jarrell
1,005
96.3
1046
24.5
12.9
14,874
Lago Vista
1,328
96.3
1026
21.1
14.4
11,681
Lake Travis
7,361
96
1117
24.3
15.5
11,483
Leander
33,179
95.9
1070
23.7
15.4
8,168
Liberty Hill
2,746
96.6
1058
23.6
14.8
9,595
847
16.6
16.5
11,143
Manor
7,685
95.4
Pflugerville
22,987
95.6
989
20.6
15.3
9,615
Round Rock
44,862
95.9
1091
24
14.9
10,239
San Marcos
7,461
95.2
923
18.4
14
11,064
Smithville
1,722
95.8
1000
21
14
9,506
Taylor
3,101
96.4
955
19.7
14.6
11,541
Wimberley
2,015
96.2
1083
23.2
14.2
10,528

3. History of the Accountability System
State accountability
In 1993, the Texas Legislature enacted statutes that mandated the creation of the Texas public school accountability system to rate school
districts and evaluate campuses. A viable and effective accountability system was achievable in Texas because the state already had the
necessary infrastructure in place: a pre-existing student-level data collection system; a state-mandated curriculum; and a statewide
assessment tied to the curriculum.
The system initiated with the 1993 legislative session remained in place through the 2001-02 school year. The ratings issued in 2002 were
the last under that system. Beginning in 2003, the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) was administered. This assessment
included more subjects and grades, and was more difficult than the previous statewide assessment. A rating system based on the TAKS
was developed during 2003. Ratings established under the redesigned system were first issued in the fall of 2004. Districts and campuses
were required to meet criteria on up to 25 separate assessment measures and up to 10 dropout and completion measures. The last year
for accountability ratings based on the TAKS was 2011.
In 2009, the Texas Legislature passed House Bill (HB) 3 mandating the creation of an entirely new accountability system focused on the
achievement of postsecondary readiness for all Texas public school students. Texas Education Agency (TEA) has worked closely with public
school personnel and others to develop an integrated accountability system based on the following goals and guiding principles.
GoalS
texas will be among the top ten states in postsecondary readiness by 2020, by:
• improving student achievement at all levels in the core subjects of the state curriculum,
• ensuring the progress of all students toward achieving advanced academic performance,
• closing advanced academic performance level gaps among groups,
• closing gaps among groups in the percentage of students graduating under the Recommended High School Program and Distinguished
achievement (advanced) High School Program
• Rewarding excellence based on other indicators in addition to state assessment results.
In 2012, no state accountability ratings were issued while the Texas Education Agency (TEA) worked with advisory committees to
develop a new rating system based on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) and a new distinction designations
system. This new accountability system allows for a large number of measures without the rating being dependent on a single measure.
The 2012-13 school year marks the first year of ratings using STAAR results and distinction designations.
2013 tRanSition yeaR
The 2013 ratings criteria and targets have been designed to apply to 2013 only because the performance index framework cannot be fully
implemented in 2013. Advisory committees will convene in fall 2013 to finalize recommendations for accountability ratings criteria for 2014
and beyond and targets for 2014 through 2016. In addition, the 2013 assessment results will be used to finalize the State of Texas
Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) 1 English Language Learner (ELL) Progress Measure.
2013 RatinG labelS
To meet state statutory requirements, the accountability system must identify acceptable and unacceptable campuses and districts.
Districts and campuses will be assigned the following rating labels based on the performance index accountability system.
Improvement Required. Denotes that a district or campus did not meet one or more performance index targets.
Not Rated: Data Integrity Issues. Indicates that a district or campus is not rated because the accuracy and/or integrity of performance
results are compromised, and it is not possible to assign a rating label based on the evaluation of performance. This label may be assigned
permanently or temporarily pending an on-site investigation.
This chart outlines the accountability ratings and distinction
designations that will be assigned in 2013.

4. 2013 Ratings Criteria
Not Rated. Indicates that a district or campus is not rated for one of the following reasons:
• the district or campus does not have students enrolled in grades higher than Early Education (EE),
• the district or campus has no data in the accountability subset,
• the district or campus has insufficient data to rate through Small Numbers Analysis,
• the campus is a Juvenile Justice Alternative Education Program (JJAEP),
• the campus is a Disciplinary Alternative Education Program (DAEP),
• the campus is a residential facility,
• the district operates only residential facilities, or
• unusual circumstances (campus test answer documents lost in shipping).
Not Rated: Data Integrity Iss ues. Indicates that a district or campus is not rated because the accuracy and/or integrity of performance
results are compromised, and it is not possible to assign a rating label based on the evaluation of performance. This label may be
assigned permanently or temporarily pending an on-site investigation.
2013 RATINGS CRITERIA
To receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, all campuses and districts must meet the following accountability targets on
all indexes for which they have performance data in 2013.
2013 index targets
Each of the four indexes will have a score of 0 to 100 representing campus/district performance points as a percent of the maximum
possible points for that campus/district. The performance targets that are set for each index will be used to assign accountability rating
labels.
Targets for non-AEA
campuses correspond to
about the fifth percentile
of non-AEA campus
performance by campus
type. Targets for non-AEA
districts correspond to
about the fifth percentile
of non-AEA campus
performance across all
campus types.
** Targets for AEA
campuses will be set at
about the fifth percentile
of AEA campus
performance and will be
applied to both AEA
campuses and charters.
DISTINCTION DESIGNATIONS
Campuses that receive an accountability rating of Met Standard are eligible for distinction designations. Campus distinction designations will
be based on campus performance in relation to a comparison group of campuses. The following campus distinction designations will
be awarded in 2013:
top 25% Student Progress
academic achievement in Reading/english language arts
academic achievement in Mathematics
SYSTEM SAFEGUARDS
With a performance index framework, poor performance in one subject or one student group does not necessarily result in an Improvement
Required accountability rating. However, disaggregated performance will be reported and districts and campuses are responsible for
addressing performance for each subject and each student group. The disaggregated performance results will serve as the basis of safeguards
for the accountability rating system to ensure that poor performance in one area or one student group is not masked in the performance index.
The intent of the safeguards system is to also meet additional federal accountability requirements that are not met in the performance index.
See Chapter 9 – Responsibilities and Consequences for more detailed information about the system safeguards that will be evaluated in 2013.

5. Region 13
Austin ISD
Bastrop ISD
Del Valle ISD
Dripping Springs ISD
Eanes ISD
Elgin ISD
Florence ISD
Georgetown ISD
Hays CISD
Hutto ISD
Jarrell ISD
Lago Vista ISD
Lake Travis ISD
Leander ISD
Liberty Hill ISD
Manor ISD
Pflugerville ISD
Round Rock ISD
San Marcos ISD
Smithville ISD
Taylor ISD
Wimberley ISD

6. Frequently Asked Questions
2013 LEGISLATIVE SESSION
Q: How will House Bill 5 (HB 5) affect the new state accountability
system?
A: HB 5 does not affect the new state accountability ratings that will
be assigned for the first time to all districts and campuses on August
8, 2013. As described in the final decisions released by the
commissioner on April 23, 2013, the 2013 state accountability rating
system will be based on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic
Readiness® (STAAR) grades 3-8 assessments administered in spring
2013 and the STAAR end-of-course assessments administered in summer 2012, fall 2012, and spring 2013. The changes to the number of
EOC assessments required for graduation will affect the state rating
system beginning with the 2013-14 school year.
It is not anticipated that the performance index framework of the new
rating system will require substantial modifications due to HB 5
changes in testing requirements for graduation or the addition of postsecondary readiness indicators. The design of the performance indexes allows for the addition and/or deletion of indicators over time.
With a performance index each measure contributes points to an
index score. Since overall performance on the index must meet a single accountability target, changes in the underlying assessment measures in a particular index do not increase the number of targets that
must be met.
During the development of the new accountability system, it was anticipated that the new accountability indicators, such as career and
technical education indicators, would be incorporated in the rating
system when available. The new postsecondary readiness indicators
listed in Section 39.053 (4)-(6) of HB 5, such as percentages of students achieving Texas Success Initiative (TSI) benchmarks, can be
evaluated with the other indicators that are currently included in Index
4: Postsecondary Readiness. Since the performance index framework
cannot be fully implemented in 2013, accountability advisory groups
will reconvene in fall 2013 to finalize recommendations for accountability ratings criteria for 2014 and beyond and targets for 2014 through
2016. At that time, advisory groups will also make recommendations
on the options for incorporating the new additional postsecondary
readiness indicators required by HB 5.
Regarding the accountability rating labels, HB 5 requires that the commissioner assign performance ratings of A – F to districts and ratings
of exemplary, recognized, acceptable, and unacceptable to campuses
beginning with the 2016-17 school year. In fall 2013, accountability advisory groups will make recommendations to the commissioner on the
accountability rating labels that will be assigned in the 2013-14 through
the 2015-16 school years.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY
Q: Why did Texas develop a performance index framework for public school accountability?
A: In the previous state accountability system, campuses and districts
were required to meet criteria on up to 25 separate assessment measures (five subjects times five student groups), plus up to 10 dropout
and high school completion measures in order to achieve the Academically Acceptable rating. Based on House Bill 3 (2009) requirements, separate indicators under the previous state accountability
framework may have resulted in up to 100 measures. The performance
index framework will produce an index score for each of the four performance indexes evaluated for each campus and district. Perform-
ance on each index will be evaluated against targets specific to each
index. With a Performance Index, the resulting rating reflects overall
performance for the campus or district rather than the weakest performance of one student group/subject area.
The performance index framework was selected by advisory committees to meet the House Bill 3 (2009) requirements for a more comprehensive accountability system focused on postsecondary readiness
and closing achievement gaps. The new framework allows educators
and the public to understand how their district or campus is performing on four indexes. The accountability reports that are planned for
the 2013 ratings release will provide an easy-to-understand summary
of each school’s performance on each index, including a graphical
presentation of each index outcome relative to the accountability target.
Q: With a performance index, how will we ensure that individual student groups are not ignored?
A: Index 3 is specifically designed to address this concern. In addition
to evaluating the economically disadvantaged student group, this
index will identify the two lowest performing race or ethnicity student
groups for the district and for each campus based on their prior year
performance. Index 3 will be the critical index in the overall district/campus evaluation that ensures that their lowest performing student groups receive focused interventions.
Also critical to ensuring individual student group performance are the
System Safeguards. The underlying accountability system safeguards
results are reported to districts and campuses and addressed through
the Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS). Along with possible interventions, the system safeguards ensure that poor performance in one area or one student group is not masked in the
performance index.
Additionally, the previous state accountability systems only evaluated
five student groups (All Students, White, Hispanic, African American,
and Economically Disadvantaged). The 2013 system will evaluate the
performance of eleven student groups (All Students, African American, Hispanic, White, American Indian, Asian, Pacific Islander, Two or
More Races, Students served by Special Education, Economically Disadvantaged, and English Language Learners) depending on the specific indicator and index.
Q: Do any other states use a performance index for the state accountability systems?
A: Yes, a number of states use different variations of performance
index systems to evaluate their schools. The accountability advisory
committee members that developed the performance index proposal
reviewed the performance index systems that are in place in the following states: California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Ohio, Oklahoma, North Carolina, and South Carolina.
Q: Who helped TEA develop the new state accountability rating system?
A: Between March 2012 and March 2013, two advisory committees, the
Accountability Technical Advisory Committee (ATAC) and the Accountability Policy Advisory Committee (APAC), met with TEA staff
numerous times to consider the complex technical issues related to
accountability and make recommendations to the commissioner on
the specific features of the system. The accountability development
materials that were reviewed at each meeting by the advisory groups
are available online at the Accountability Development Materials site.

7. Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Who helped TEA develop the new state accountability rating system?
Q: When will schools receive their distinction designations?
A: Between March 2012 and March 2013, two advisory committees, the
Accountability Technical Advisory Committee (ATAC) and the Accountability Policy Advisory Committee (APAC), met with TEA staff
numerous times to consider the complex technical issues related to accountability and make recommendations to the commissioner on the
specific features of the system. The accountability development materials that were reviewed at each meeting by the advisory groups are
available online at the Accountability Development Materials site.
A: Distinction designations will be assigned to eligible campuses
concurrent with the release of the state accountability ratings on
August 8, 2013.
Q: Who are the members of the APAC and ATAC advisory groups?
A: In addition to educators representing campuses, school districts, and
education service centers, the members of the Accountability
Policy Advisory Committee include legislative representatives,
business and community leaders, representatives of higher education,
and parents of children attending Texas public schools.
Members of the Accountability Technical Advisory Committee are Texas
public school educators from districts and education service centers
who have detailed knowledge of the state assessment and
accountability systems.
DISTINCTION DESIGNATIONS
Q: What are Distinction Designations?
A: Campuses that receive an accountability rating of Met Standard are
eligible for the following distinction designations in 2013.
Top 25% Student Progress
Academic Achievement in Reading/English language arts
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
Q: Are alternative education campuses eligible for Distinction
Designations?
A: No. Campuses evaluated under alternative education accountability
(AEA) provisions are not eligible for distinction designations, per Texas
Education Code (TEC) §39.201.
Q: What is a comparison group?
A: Campus distinction designations will be based on campus performance in relation to a comparison group of campuses. Each
campus is assigned to a unique comparison group of 40 other public
schools (from anywhere in the state), that closely matches that school
on the following characteristics: campus type, campus size, percent
economically disadvantaged students, mobility rates (based on cumulative attendance), and percent of students with limited English
proficiency. The campus comparison groups that will be used for the
2013 distinction designations will be posted online in mid-June, 2013.
Q: Will schools and districts be able to earn Gold Performance
Acknowledgments in 2013?
A: Gold Performance Acknowledgments will no longer be awarded. TEC
requires that Distinction Designations be assigned to campuses for outstanding academic achievement.
2013 TARGETS AND RATINGS
Q: How is a rating label determined for 2013?
A: With a performance index, each measure contributes points to an
index score. Each of the four indexes will have a score of 0 to 100
representing campus or district performance points as a percent of
the maximum possible points for that campus or district.
M e t S t a n d a r d : Assigned to districts and campuses that meet
performance index targets on all indexes for which they have
performance data in 2013.
Met alternative Standard: Assigned to charter operators and alternative
education campuses (AECs) evaluated under alternative education
accountability (AEA) provisions that meet modified performance index
targets on all indexes for which they have performance data in 2013.
improvement Required: Assigned to a district or campus that did not
meet one or more performance index targets in 2013.
Q: Are all districts and campuses rated in 2013, including new
campuses?
A: All public school campuses, including alternative education campuses
(AECs) and open-enrollment charter schools are evaluated. New
campuses and new open-enrollment charter schools are evaluated the
first year they report fall enrollment.
Q: What if a campus does not have data for an Index?
A: Campuses and districts receive an accountability rating based on all
indexes for which they have performance data in 2013. In some
instances, a campus may not have data necessary to calculate an index
score, due to lack of students or grade-level configurations. For example, in 2013, most elementary campuses will not have postsecondary
data needed to calculate an Index 4 score. In these situations, the overall 2013 accountability rating will be calculated using the remaining three
index scores.
Q: When will schools receive their accountability ratings?
A: All schools and districts will be rated under the new accountability
system in 2013, and will receive those ratings on August 8, 2013.
Q: When will the 2013 Accountability Manual be posted online?
A: Chapters 3 - 9 of the 2013 Accountability Manual are now available
online. The remaining chapters and each appendix will be posted
in mid-June, 2013.

8. Notifications and Calendar
NOTIFICATION OF RATINGS
August 1, 2013
The TEA secure website will be updated to include campus and district data tables that contain accountability data on which ratings will
be calculated. See Chapter 11 – TEASE Accountability for more information.
August 8, 2013
Notification of campus and district accountability ratings will occur on August 8, 2013. TEA’s website will be updated to include campus
and district data tables and summary reports.
Early November, 2013
When the appeals process is complete, accountability ratings are considered final. Agency web products related to 2013 accountability
ratings will be updated to reflect the outcome of appeals.
2013
January 8
83rd Regular Session of the Texas Legislature convenes
January
STAAR (grades 3-8) results from spring 2012 available with standards
February 11-12
Fifth meeting of the ATAC
March 7
Third meeting of APAC
March
Commissioner releases final decisions for 2013 accountability ratings and distinctions
May
Key chapters of 2013 Accountability Manual released
May 27
Last day of 83rd Regular Session of the Texas Legislature
Early June
Graduation and dropout data available to districts
August 8
District and campuses ratings are released, based on percent proficient indicator. Some distinction
designations are assigned to campuses.
August 8
Ratings may be appealed.
Late September
Appeals Panel meets to consider appeals.
October
Commissioner determines final ratings; ratings updated.
November
Release of 2012-13 Performance Reports.
2014
February/March
Annual meeting of the ATAC and APAC.
March
Commissioner releases final decisions for 2014 ratings
May
Key chapters of 2014 Accountability Manual released.
Early June
Graduation and dropout data available to districts
June 15
Notification reports issued to districts for campuses rated as “unacceptable*” in 2013 that are anticipated
to be rated as “unacceptable*” in 2014.
August 8
Release of district and campus performance ratings based on percent proficient and percent college
ready indicators. Some distinction designations are assigned to districts and campuses.
August 8
Ratings may be appealed.
Late September
Appeals Panel meets to consider appeals
Early October
Commissioner determines final ratings; ratings updated.
November
Release of 2013-14 Performance Reports.

9. 2013 Accountability Ratings
AUSTIN - The Texas Education Agency today released the 2013 state accountability system ratings for more than 1,200 school districts and charters, and more
than 8,500 campuses. The ratings reveal that almost 93 percent of school districts and charters across Texas have achieved the rating of Met Standard.
Districts, campuses and charters receive one of three ratings under the new accountability system: Met Standard; Met Alternative Standard;
or Improvement Required. School district ratings (including charter operators) by category in 2013 are as follows:
Under the 2013 state accountability system, campus ratings (including charter campuses) by category and school type are as follows:
For eligible campuses that achieve the rating of Met Standard, distinction designations in the following areas have also been assigned:
Top 25 Percent Student Progress; Academic Achievement in Reading/English language arts; and Academic Achievement in Mathematics.
Approximately 3,600 campuses that achieved the Met Standard rating earned some type of distinction. More than 750 campuses earned
distinctionsin all three potential areas. These distinction designations are based on campus performance in relation to a comparison group
of campuses. Distinctions earned (by campus type) in 2013 are as follows:
* Denotes campus received Met Standard rating plus all three possible distinctions under the 2013 state accountability system.
To view the 2013 state accountability ratings for districts, charters and campuses, visit the
Texas Education Agency web site at http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2013/index.html.

10. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 1
DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY
DIVISION OF PERFORMANCE REPORTING
PRELIMINARY 2013 ACCOUNTABILITY RATINGS
BY DISTRICT NAME
District/Campus Name
Austin ISD
AUSTIN H S
LANIER H S
MCCALLUM H S
REAGAN H S
TRAVIS H S
CROCKETT H S
ANDERSON H S
ALTERNATIVE LEARNING CTR
BOWIE H S
LBJ HIGH SCHOOL
GARZA INDEPENDENCE H S
AKINS H S
LASA H S
EASTSIDE MEMORIAL AT THE
JOHNSTON
IDEA ALLAN COLLEGE PREP
PREMIER H S AT TRAVIS
PREMIER H S AT LANIER
TRAVIS COUNTY DAY SCHOOL
RICHARDS SCH FOR YOUNG
WOMEN LEADERS
INTERNATIONAL H S
TRAVIS COUNTY JUVENILE DET.
PHOENIX ACADEMY
LEADERSHIP ACADEMY
TRAVIS COUNTY J J A E P
FULMORE M S
KEALING M S
LAMAR M S
BURNET M S
O HENRY M S
PEARCE M S
MARTIN M S
MURCHISON M S
WEBB M S
BEDICHEK M S
DOBIE M S
GARCIA MIDDLE
COVINGTON M S
MENDEZ M S
BAILEY M S
SMALL M S
PAREDES M S
GORZYCKI MIDDLE
ALLISON EL
ANDREWS EL
BARTON HILLS EL
BECKER EL
BLACKSHEAR EL
BLANTON EL
BRENTWOOD EL
BROOKE EL
BROWN EL
BRYKER WOODS EL
CAMPBELL EL
CASIS EL
CUNNINGHAM EL
DAWSON EL
DAEP- EL
GOVALLE EL
GULLETT EL
HARRIS EL
HIGHLAND PARK EL
JOSLIN EL
LEE EL
MAPLEWOOD EL
Campus #
201 3 Accountability Rating
1
227901
002
004
005
006
007
008
009
012
013
014
015
017
018
Met Standard
Met Standard
Improvement Required
Met Standard
Met Standard
Improvement Required
Met Standard
Met Standard
Not Rated
Met Standard
Improvement Required
Met Alternative Std
Met Standard
Met Standard
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
019
024
025
026
027
028
029
030
032
035
036
043
044
045
046
047
048
051
052
053
054
055
056
057
058
059
060
061
062
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
Improvement Required
Met Standard
Met Alternative Std
Met Alternative Std
Improvement Required
Met Standard
Not Rated
Not Rated
Not Rated
Not Rated
Not Rated
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Improvement Required
Improvement Required
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Improvement Required
Improvement Required
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Not Rated
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Indexes
2
3
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
4
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Read ELA
Distinctions
Math
Progress
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y

11. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 1
DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY
DIVISION OF PERFORMANCE REPORTING
PRELIMINARY 2013 ACCOUNTABILITY RATINGS
BY DISTRICT NAME
District/Campus Name
Campus #
MAPLEWOOD EL
122
MATHEWS EL
123
METZ EL
124
OAK SPRINGS EL
125
ORTEGA EL
126
SANCHEZ EL
127
PEASE EL
128
PECAN SPRINGS EL
129
PLEASANT HILL EL
130
READ PRE-K DEMONSTRATION 131
REILLY EL
132
RIDGETOP EL
133
ST ELMO EL
136
SUMMITT EL
138
SIMS EL
139
TRAVIS HTS EL
140
WALNUT CREEK EL
141
ALLAN EL
142
PATTON EL
143
WOOTEN EL
144
ZAVALA EL
145
ZILKER EL
146
MENCHACA EL
147
OAK HILL EL
148
BARRINGTON EL
149
NORMAN EL
150
PILLOW EL
151
WOOLDRIDGE EL
152
DOSS EL
154
HILL EL
155
ODOM EL
156
WINN EL
157
SUNSET VALLEY EL
158
GRAHAM EL
159
LINDER EL
160
COOK EL
161
HOUSTON EL 1
162
HART EL
163
PICKLE EL
164
MCBEE EL
165
WILLIAMS EL
166
LANGFORD EL
168
BOONE EL
170
PALM EL
171
KOCUREK EL
172
CASEY EL
173
RODRIGUEZ EL
174
WIDEN EL
175
GALINDO EL
176
UPHAUS EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR 177
JORDAN EL
178
DAVIS EL
179
KIKER EL
180
MILLS EL
181
BARANOFF EL
182
COWAN EL
183
CLAYTON EL
184
BLAZIER EL
185
BALDWIN EL
187
OVERTON EL
189
PEREZ EL
190
IDEA ALLAN ACADEMY
191
DOBIE PK CENTER
192
WEBB PRI CENTER
193
AUSTIN ST HOSPITAL
250
ROSEDALE
251
2013 Accountability Rating
1
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Improvement Required
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Not Rated
Improvement Required
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Indexes
2
3
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
4
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Distinctions
Math
Progress
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Read ELA
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y

12. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 1
DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY
DIVISION OF PERFORMANCE REPORTING
PRELIMINARY 2013 ACCOUNTABILITY RATINGS
BY DISTRICT NAME
District/Campus Name
Bastrop ISD
BASTROP H S
CEDAR CREEK H S
GENESIS H S
GATEWAY SCH
BASTROP MIDDLE
EMILE EL
MINA EL
CEDAR CREEK EL
BASTROP INT
CEDAR CREEK MIDDLE
RED ROCK EL
CEDAR CREEK INT
BLUEBONNET EL
LOST PINES EL
Del Valle ISD
DEL VALLE H S
DEL VALLE OPPORTUNITY CTR
TRAVIS CO J J A E P
DEL VALLE MIDDLE
JOHN P OJEDA J H
DAILEY MIDDLE
POPHAM EL
SMITH EL
HILLCREST EL
BATY EL
HORNSBY-DUNLAP EL
DEL VALLE EL
CREEDMOOR EL
JOSEPH GILBERT EL
Dripping Springs ISD
DRIPPING SPRINGS H S
DRIPPING SPRINGS MIDDLE
DRIPPING SPRINGS EL
WALNUT SPRINGS EL
ROOSTER SPRINGS EL
Eanes ISD
WESTLAKE H S
HILL COUNTRY MIDDLE
WEST RIDGE MIDDLE
EANES EL
CEDAR CREEK EL
VALLEY VIEW EL
FOREST TRAIL EL
BARTON CREEK EL
BRIDGE POINT EL
Elgin ISD
ELGIN H S
PHOENIX H S
ELGIN MIDDLE
BOOKER T WASHINGTON EL
ELGIN EL
NEIDIG EL
Florence ISD
FLORENCE H S
FLORENCE MIDDLE
FLORENCE EL
Campus #
2013 Accountability Rating
1
011901
001
002
022
033
041
101
102
103
104
106
107
108
109
110
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Alternative Std
Not Rated
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Y
Y
Y
Y
227910
001
002
005
041
042
043
101
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
105904
001
041
101
102
103
227909
001
041
042
101
102
103
104
105
106
011902
001
004
041
101
102
103
246902
001
041
101
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Alternative Std
Not Rated
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Improvement Required
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Alternative Std
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Indexes
2
3
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
4
Read ELA
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Distinctions
Math
Progress
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y

13. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 1
DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY
DIVISION OF PERFORMANCE REPORTING
PRELIMINARY 2013 ACCOUNTABILITY RATINGS
BY DISTRICT NAME
District/Campus Name
Georgetown ISD
GEORGETOWN H S
CHIP RICHARTE H S
GEORGETOWN ALTER PROG
EAST VIEW H S
DOUGLAS BENOLD MIDDLE
JAMES TIPPIT MIDDLE
CHARLES A FORBES MIDDLE
ANNIE PURL EL
CARVER EL
FROST EL
PAT COOPER EL
DELL PICKETT EL
RAYE MCCOY EL
VILLAGE EL
WILLIAMS EL
JO ANN FORD EL
JAMES E MITCHELL EL
WILLIAMSON CO J J A E P
WILLIAMSON CO JUVENILE DET.
Hays CISD
JACK C HAYS H S
HAYS CO JUVENILE JUSTICE ALT
LIVE OAK ACADEMY
LEHMAN H S
R C BARTON MIDDLE
ERIC DAHLSTROM MIDDLE
LAURA B WALLACE MIDDLE
ARMANDO CHAPA MIDDLE
D J RED SIMON MIDDLE
KYLE EL
TOM GREEN EL
BUDA EL
ELM GROVE EL
SUSIE FUENTES EL
HEMPHILL EL
TOBIAS EL
LAURA B NEGLEY EL
SCIENCE HALL EL
BLANCO VISTA EL
CAMINO REAL EL
CARPENTER HILL EL
RALPH PFLUGER EL
Hutto ISD
HUTTO H S
WILLIAMSON COUNTY ACADEMY
LOTT DETENTION CENTER
HUTTO MIDDLE
FARLEY MIDDLE
HUTTO EL
COTTONWOOD CREEK EL
RAY EL
NADINE JOHNSON EL
Jarrell ISD
JARRELL H S
WILLIAMSON CO J J A E P
LOTT DETENTION CENTER
JARRELL MIDDLE
JARRELL EL
Campus #
2013 Accountability Rating
1
246904
001
002
003
004
040
041
042
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
197
199
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Alternative Std
Not Rated
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Not Rated
Not Rated
Y
Y
Y
105906
001
003
004
005
041
043
044
045
046
101
103
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
246906
001
002
003
041
042
101
103
104
121
246907
001
002
004
041
101
Met Standard
Met Standard
Not Rated
Met Alternative Std
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Not Rated
Not Rated
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Not Rated
Not Rated
Met Standard
Improvement Required
Indexes
2
3
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
4
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Read ELA
Distinctions
Math
Progress
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y

14. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 1
DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY
DIVISION OF PERFORMANCE REPORTING
PRELIMINARY 2013 ACCOUNTABILITY RATINGS
BY DISTRICT NAME
District/Campus Name
Lago Vista ISD
LAGO VISTA H S
LAGO VISTA MIDDLE
LAGO VISTA EL
Lake Travis ISD
Campus #
2013 Accountability Rating
1
227912
001
041
101
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Y
Y
Y
Y
LAKE TRAVIS H S
TRAVIS CO J J A E P
LAKE TRAVIS MIDDLE
HUDSON BEND MIDDLE
LAKE TRAVIS EL
LAKEWAY EL
BEE CAVE ELEMENTARY
LAKE POINTE ELEMENTARY
SERENE HILLS ELEMENTARYL
227913
001
002
041
042
101
102
103
104
105
Met Standard
Met Standard
Not Rated
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
LEANDER H S
CEDAR PARK H S
VISTA RIDGE H S
ROUSE H S
VANDEGRIFT H S
WILLIAMSON CO ACADEMY
NEW HOPE H S
WILLIAMSON COUNTY DETENTION
CEDAR PARK MIDDLE
LEANDER MIDDLE
RUNNING BRUSHY MIDDLE
ARTIE L HENRY MIDDLE
CANYON RIDGE MIDDLE
KNOX WILEY MIDDLE
FOUR POINTS MIDDLE
FLORENCE W STILES MIDDLE
WHITESTONE EL
ADA MAE FAUBION EL
BLOCK HOUSE CREEK EL
CYPRESS EL
C C MASON EL
LOIS F GIDDENS EL
STEINER RANCH EL
PAULINE NAUMANN EL
BAGDAD EL
CHARLOTTE COX EL
LAURA WELCH BUSH EL
PATRICIA KNOWLES EL
DEER CREEK EL
PLEASANT HILL EL
RUTLEDGE EL
JIM PLAIN EL
WILLIAM J WINKLEY EL 1
RIVER PLACE EL
GRANDVIEW HILLS EL
PARKSIDE EL
WESTSIDE EL
RONALD REAGAN EL
RIVER RIDGE EL
246913
001
002
003
004
005
010
011
012
041
042
043
044
045
046
047
048
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
17
118
119
120
121
122
123
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Not Rated
Not Rated
Not Rated
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Leander ISD
Liberty Hill ISD
LIBERTY HILL H S
WILLIAMSON CO JUVENILE DET
LIBERTY HILL J H
LIBERTY HILL EL
LIBERTY HILL INT
BILL BURDEN EL
246908
001
006
041
101
102
103
Met Standard
Met Standard
Not Rated
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Y
Y
Indexes
2
3
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
4
Read ELA
Distinctions
Math
Progress
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y

15. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 1
DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY
DIVISION OF PERFORMANCE REPORTING
PRELIMINARY 2013 ACCOUNTABILITY RATINGS
BY DISTRICT NAME
Di strict/Campus N ame
Campus #
Manor ISD
227907
MANOR H S
001
MANOR EXCEL ACADEMY
002
MANOR NEW TECHNOLOGY HIGH 004
MANOR MIDDLE
041
DECKER MIDDLE
042
MANOR EL
101
BLUEBONNET TRAIL EL
102
DECKER EL
104
BLAKE MANOR EL
105
PRESIDENTIAL MEADOWS EL
106
OAK MEADOWS EL
107
PIONEER CROSSING EL
108
Pflugerville ISD
PFLUGERVILLE H S
JOHN B CONNALLY H S
HENDRICKSON H S
TRAVIS CO J J A E P
PFLUGERVILLE MIDDLE
WESTVIEW MIDDLE
PARK CREST MIDDLE
DESSAU MIDDLE
KELLY LANE MIDDLE
PFLUGERVILLE EL
PARMER LANE EL
TIMMERMAN EL
NORTHWEST EL
DESSAU EL
WINDERMERE EL
RIVER OAKS EL
BROOKHOLLOW EL
SPRINGHILL EL
WINDERMERE PRI
COPPERFIELD EL
MURCHISON EL
DELCO PRI
CALDWELL EL
ROWE LANE EL
HIGHLAND PARK EL
WIELAND EL
RIOJAS EL
RUTH BARRON EL
227904
001
003
004
008
041
042
043
045
046
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
Round Rock ISD
246909
ROUND ROCK H S
001
ROUND ROCK OPPORT CTR DAEP 002
WESTWOOD H S
003
MCNEIL H S
004
STONY POINT H S
007
CEDAR RIDGE H S
008
SUCCESS H S
011
WILLIAMSON CO J J A E P
012
WM S LOTT JUVENILE CTR
016
C D FULKES MIDDLE
041
NOEL GRISHAM MIDDLE
042
CHISHOLM TRAIL MIDDLE
043
CANYON VISTA MIDDLE
044
DEERPARK MIDDLE
045
HOPEWELL MIDDLE
046
CEDAR VALLEY MIDDLE
047
RIDGEVIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL
051
JAMES GARLAND WALSH MIDDLE 052
PFC ROBERT P HERNANDEZ
053
CLAUDE BERKMAN EL
101
EL DAEP
102
2013 Accountability Rating
1
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Alternative Std
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Improvement Required
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Not Rated
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Not Rated
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Alternative Std
Not Rated
Not Rated
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Not Rated
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Indexes
2
3
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
4
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Distinctions
Math
Progress
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Read ELA
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y

16. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 1
DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY
DIVISION OF PERFORMANCE REPORTING
PRELIMINARY 2013 ACCOUNTABILITY RATINGS
BY DISTRICT NAME
District/Campus Name
Campus #
2013 Accountability Rating
1
CLAUDE BERKMAN EL
EL DAEP
SPICEWOOD EL
XENIA VOIGT EL
DEEP WOOD EL
FOREST NORTH EL
ANDERSON MILL EL
KATHY CARAWAY EL
VIC ROBERTSON EL
PURPLE SAGE EL
BRUSHY CREEK EL
WELLS BRANCH EL
LAUREL MOUNTAIN EL
POND SPRINGS EL 1
BLUEBONNET EL
DOUBLE FILE TRAIL EL
LIVE OAK EL
GATTIS EL
OLD TOWN EL
FERN BLUFF EL
JOLLYVILLE EL
CANYON CREEK EL
FOREST CREEK EL
CALDWELL HEIGHTS EL
GREAT OAKS EL
BLACKLAND PRAIRIE EL
TERAVISTA EL
CACTUS RANCH EL
PATSY SOMMER EL
CHANDLER OAKS EL
NEYSA CALLISON EL
UNION HILL EL
LINDA HERRINGTON EL
ELSA ENGLAND EL
101
102
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
113
114
115
116
17
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
130
131
132
134
135
136
137
138
139
Met Standard
Not Rated
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Y
San Marcos CISD
SAN MARCOS H S
HAYS CO JUVENILE JUSTICE ALT
GOODNIGHT MIDDLE
MILLER MIDDLE
BOWIE EL
CROCKETT EL
DEZAVALA EL
TRAVIS EL
HERNANDEZ EL
MENDEZ EL
105902
001
004
041
043
101
102
103
105
107
108
SMITHVILLE H S
SMITHVILLE J H
SMITHVILLE EL
BROWN PRI
011904
002
041
101
102
Smithville ISD
Taylor ISD
TAYLOR H S
WILLIAMSON CO JJAEP
TAYLOR MIDDLE
T H JOHNSON EL
NAOMI PASEMANN EL
NORTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD
Wimberley ISD
WIMBERLEY H S
DANFORTH J H
JACOB'S WELL EL
SCUDDER PRI
246911
001
010
041
102
103
107
105905
001
041
101
102
Met Standard
Met Standard
Not Rated
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Improvement Required
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Not Rated
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Met Standard
Indexes
2
3
Y
4
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Distinctions
Math
Progress
Y
Y
Y
Y
Read ELA
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y

17. Graduation and Drop Out Rates
TExAS HIGH SCHOOL GRADuATION RATE SETS ANOTHER ALL-TIME HIGH
August 6, 2013
AuSTIN - Commissioner of Education Michael Williams announced today that the Texas high school on-time graduation rate has set
an all-time high, reaching 87.7 percent for the Class of 2012. The graduation rate for the Class of 2012 is 1.8 percentage points higher
than the previous record set by the Class of 2011 and marks the fifth consecutive year the rate has increased.
YEAR
GRADuATION RATE
Class of 2012
87.7 percent
Class of 2011
85.9 percent
Class of 2010
84.3 percent
Class of 2009
80.6 percent
Class of 2008
79.1 percent
Class of 2007
78.0 percent
"last year, the class of 2011 in texas set a graduation rate that was among the highest in the nation, and now the class of 2012 has bested that
number," said commissioner Williams. "all those working in texas education should be proud of our strong numbers and the strides we
continue to make as a state."
Out of 316,758 students in the Class of 2012 Grade 9 cohort, 87.7 percent graduated. An additional five percent of students in the Class of 2012
continued in high school the fall after their anticipated graduation date. One percent received GED certificates.
the latest graduation figures are among the findings highlighted in the texas education agency's study, "Secondary School completion and
Dropouts in texas Public Schools, 2011-12 ." other notable graduation findings from the study include:
• across racial/ethnic groups, the graduation rate for the class of 2012 reflects all-time highs for White (93 percent), Hispanic
(84.3 percent) and african-american (83.5 percent) students.
• asian students in texas had the highest graduation rate (94.4 percent) in the class of 2012 Grade 9 cohort.
• Females in the class of 2012 Grade 9 cohort had a higher graduation rate (90.1 percent) than males (85.4 percent).
• the graduation rate for economically disadvantaged students in the class of 2012 Grade 9 cohort was 85.1 percent, an increase of 1.4
percentage points over the class of 2011.
Out of 2,150,364 students who attended Grades 7-12 in Texas public schools during the 2011-12 school year, 1.7 percent were reported to have
dropped out, an increase of 0.1 percentage points from 2010-11. The number of dropouts in Grades 7-12 increased to 36,276, a 5.6 percent
increase from the 34,363 students who dropped out in 2010-11.
"Districts across our state work every year to keep students in school and to get those students who have left to return to the classroom,"
said Commissioner Williams. "But as long as there are students who are not reaching the finish line and earning their high school diploma, we
should not be satisfied. As Commissioner, I will be watching closely how districts address this critical issue."
other dropout findings from the study include:
• a total of 1,991 students dropped out of Grades 7-8, and 34,285 dropped out of Grades 9-12. the Grade 7-8 and Grade 9-12 annual dropout
rates were 0.3 percent and 2.4 percent, respectively.
• across racial/ethnic groups, the 2011-12 Grade 7-12 dropout rates showed asian students at 0.6 percent, White students at 0.8 percent,
Hispanic students at 2.1 percent and african-american students at 2.6 percent.
• the Grade 7-12 dropout rate for males (1.9 percent) exceeded the rate for females (1.5 percent) in 2011-12. More males dropped out from Grade
9 (5,436) than from any other grade. by contrast, more females dropped out from Grade 12 (4,818) than from any other grade.
• the longitudinal dropout rate for economically disadvantaged students was 7.8 percent, an increase of 0.1 percentage points from the class
of 2011
A dropout is defined as a student who is enrolled in public school in Grades 7-12, does not return to public school the following fall, is
not expelled, and does not: graduate, receive a GED certificate, continue school outside the public school system, begin college, or die.

18. Dallam
Sherman Hansford Ochiltree
Lipscomb
Hartley
Moore
Hutchinson
Hemphill
Oldham
Potter
Carson
Deaf Smith
Randall
Parmer
Castro
Roberts
Gray
Collingsworth
Armstrong Donley
Swisher
Briscoe
Regional Education
Service Centers
Regional Education Service Centers
Wheeler
Childress
Hall
Hardeman
Wilbarger Wichita
Foard
Clay
Yoakum
T
erry
Gaines
Andrews
El Paso
Loving
Hudspeth
Winkler
Ward
Culberson
Reeves
Ector
Crane
Lynn
Dawson
Martin
Garza
Borden
Kent
Scurry
Howard
Mitchell
Midland Glasscock Sterling
Upton
Pecos
Reagan
Irion
Knox
Nolan
Coke
T
aylor
Runnels
T
om
Green
Brewster
Val Verde
Brown
McCulloch
Gillespie
Kerr
Edwards
Real
Maverick
Uvalde
Zavala
Dimmit
Williamson
Kendall
Bandera
Wilson
Frio
La Salle
Lavaca
Victoria
Live
Oak
Jim
Wells
Duval
Refugio
Bee
San Patricio
Polk
Jim
Hogg
Brooks
Starr
Hardin
Liberty
Harris
Fort Bend
Chambers
Galveston
Brazoria
Matagorda
Calhoun
Aransas
Nueces
Orange
Jefferson
Kenedy
Willacy
Hidalgo
School Contact Information
Address
Austin
Tyler
Sabine
San
Jacinto
Kleberg
Zapata
Shelby
Angelina
Montgomery
Wharton
Jackson
Goliad
McMullen
Webb
Colorado
Karnes
Atascosa
Walker
Austin
Dewitt
Panola
Nacogdoches
Washington
Fayette
Guadalupe
Gonzales
Bexar
Medina
Madison
Burleson
Caldwell
Comal
Rusk
Trinity
Brazos
Bastrop
Hays
Gregg
Houston
Leon
Lee
Travis
Blanco
Harrison
Smith
Anderson Cherokee
Limestone
Milam
Marion
Upshur
Henderson
Robertson
Bell
Cass
Camp
Van
Falls
Burnet
Kimble
Bowie
Titus
Freestone
Coryell
Llano
Wood
Zandt
Navarro
McLennan
San Saba Lampasas
Mason
Rains
Rockwall
Ellis
Hill
Bosque
Hamilton
Hopkins
Hunt
Kaufman
Johnson
Somervell
Erath
Delta
Collin
Dallas
T
arrant
Hood
Red
River
Lamar
Fannin
Grayson
Denton
Parker
Mills
Concho
Menard
Kinney
Palo
Pinto
Eastland
Cooke
Wise
Comanche
Coleman
T
errell
Presidio
Young
morton
Callahan
Schleicher
Crockett
Jack
ShackelStephens
ford
Jones
Fisher
Montague
Archer
Throck-
Stonewall Haskell
Sutton
Jeff Davis
Baylor
Newton
King
San
Augustine
Cottle
Jasper
Motley
Dickens
Morris
Floyd
Crosby
Franklin
Hale
Lubbock
Grimes
Lamb
Waller
Bailey
Cochran Hockley
1 Edinburg
2 Corpus Christi
3 Victoria
4 Houston
5 Beaumont
6 Huntsville
7 Kilgore
8 Mt. Pleasant
9 Wichita Falls
10 Richardson
11 Fort Worth
12 Waco
13 Austin
14 Abilene
15 San Angelo
16 Amarillo
17 Lubbock
18 Midland
19 El Paso
20 San Antonio
Cameron
http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us
Phone
Website
1111 W 6th St, Austin, TX 78703
(512) 414-1700
http://www.austinisd.org
Bastrop
906 Farm St, Bastrop, TX 78602
(512) 321-2292
http://www.bastrop.isd.tenet.edu
Del Valle
5301 Ross Rd., Ste 103, Del Valle, TX 78617
(512) 386-3010
http://delvalle.tx.schoolwebpages.com
Dripping Springs
PO BOX 479, Dripping Springs, TX 78620
(512) 858-3000
http://www.dsisd.txed.net
Eanes
601 Camp Craft Rd, Austin, TX 78746
(512) 732-9001
http://www.eanesisd.net
Elgin
PO BOX 351, Elgin, TX 78621
(512) 281-3434
http://www.elginisd.net
Florence
PO BOX 489, Florence, TX 76527
(254) 793-2850
http://florence.tx.schoolwebpages.com
Georgetown
603 Lakeway Dr.,Georgetown, TX 78628
(512) 943-5015
http://www.georgetownisd.org
Hays
21003 Interstate 35, Kyle, TX 78640
(512) 268-2141
http://www.hayscisd.net
Hutto
PO BOX 430, Hutto, TX 78634
(512) 759-3771
http://www.hutto.txed.net/education
Jarrell
PO BOX 9, Jarrell, TX 76537
(512) 746-2124
http://www.esc13.net/jarrell/
Lago Vista
PO BOX 4929, Lago Vista, TX 78645
(512) 267-8300
http://www.lagovistaisd.net
Lake Travis
3322 RR 620 S., Austin, TX 78738
(512) 533-6000
http://www.ltisdschools.org/laketravis
Leander
P O BOX 218, Leander, TX 78646
(512) 434-5000
http://www.leanderisd.org
Liberty Hill
14001 W Hwy 29, Liberty Hill, TX 78642
(512) 260-5580
http://www.libertyhill.txed.net
Manor
PO BOX 359, Manor, TX 78653
(512) 278-4000
http://www.manorisd.net
Pflugerville
1401 W Pecan St, Pflugerville, TX 78660
(512) 594-0000
http://www.pflugervilleisd.net
Round Rock
1311 Round Rock Ave., Round Rock, TX 78681
(512) 464-5000
http://www.roundrockisd.org
San Marcos
PO BOX 1087, San Marcos, TX 78667
(512) 393-6700
http://www.smcisd.net
Smithville
PO BOX 479, Smithville, TX 78957
(512) 237-2487
http://www.smithvilleisd.org
Taylor
602 W 12th St, Taylor, TX 76574
(512) 365-1391
http://www.taylorisd.org
Wimberley
14401 RR 12, Wimberley, TX 78676
(512) 847-2414
http://www.wimberley.txed.net

19. Austins Largest Private Schools
As in all progressive cities, education is important to the people of Austin Texas – and it is an especially
important consideration for those relocating to a new city. That emphasis on quality education has
translated into a wealth of choices for private and parochial schools – offering more options for parents
and children – and Austin Texas is no exception.
According to u.S. Department of Education statistics, private schools have slowly become a more
popular alternative – even in the face of recession and curbed spending. Recent figures from a National
Association of Independent Schools (NAIS) survey found that while enrollment dipped less than 1
percent nationally, it’s still higher than it was five years ago.
Today, the Department of Education estimates that 6 million students attend the country’s 33,000
private schools – about 11 percent of all American elementary and high school students. These Austin
private schools run the gamut – from elite preparatory academies that cost more than $20,000
annually to less pricey parochial schools where tuition is often offset by generous donations.
Austin’s Private Schools
Given the city’s accolades as an educated community with lots of brainpower, it’s not surprising that
there are more than 300 private schools in Austin Texas and in surrounding Central Texas communities,
with enrollment that ranges from pre-K through 12th grade.
The total enrollment for all private schools in the Austin Metro area is more than 11,000, and student
tuition ranges from $300 per month to $18,000 per school year. Austin also has an active home school
and charter school community.
The following is a list of the 25 largest private schools in the Austin Texas area – including the most
recent enrollment figures, grades served, address, contact information and website, where available.
This and the list of colleges were provided by the Austin Relocation Guide http://www.austinrelocationguide.com

20. 1. Regents School of Austin
10. St. Theresa’s School
19. St. Ignatius Martyr School
Grades K-12; Enrollment: 900+
3230 Travis Country Circle
512-899-8095
www.regents-austin.com
Focus is “a classical and christian education in
the service of both God and man.”
Grades PK-8; Enrollment: 425+
4311 Small Drive
512-451-7105
www.st-theresa.org
School’s mission is to “develop elementary/
middle school students to their full potential by
educating them in a catholic and academically
excellent environment.”
Grades PK-8; Enrollment: 272
120 West Oltorf Street
512-442-8547
www.st-ignatius.org/school/
School is a “christian environment where
students, teachers and parents build a
community of faith, hope and love.”
11. St. Gabriel’s Catholic School
Grades PreK-8; Enrollment: 225+
7415 Manchaca Road
512-447-1447
www.stricklandschool.com
School’s mission is to “equip students to be
lovers of Jesus and His Word and to emulate
christ’s character, purpose and ministry.”
2. St. Andrew’s Episcopal School
Grades 1-12; Enrollment: 850
Lower & Middle Schools – Grades 1-8
1112 West 31st Street
512-299-9800
upper School – Grades 9-12
5901 Southwest Parkway
512-299-9700
www.sasaustin.org
episcopal school focused on well-rounded
education of community service, academics,
and social skills.
3. Brentwood Christian School
Grades PK-12; Enrollment: 713+
11908 N. Lamar Blvd.
512-835-5983
www.brentwoodchristian.org
"christ-centered education” at church of christ
school.
4. St. Stephen’s Episcopal School
Grades 6-12; Enrollment: 665+
2900 Bunny Run
512-327-1213
www.sstx.org
Rigorous academics/college prep school; sports,
fine arts activities; boarding optional.
5. Hyde Park Baptist School
Grades K-12; Enrollment: 540+
3901 Speedway
512-465-8338
www.hpbs.org
academic excellence, christian values, college
prep curriculum; affiliated with Hyde Park
baptist church.
6. Redeemer Lutheran School
Grades K-8; Enrollment: 500+
1500 West Anderson Lane
512-451-6478
www.redeemerschool.net
“christ-centered environment dedicated to
developing the whole child: spiritually,
intellectually, physically, emotionally, socially.”
7. Hill Country Christian School of
Austin
Grades K-12; Enrollment: 500+
12124 RR 620 North
512-331-7036
www.hillcountrychristianschool.org
christ-centered college prep school with
“classical teaching methodology.”
8. Round Rock Christian Academy
Grades PK-12; Enrollment: 500+
301 N. Lake Creek Drive
512-255-4491 (Main office); 512-716-1354
(Secondary office)
www.rrca-tx.org
curriculum includes chapel, bible study, music,
fine arts, learning centers and creative play.
9. Holy Family Catholic School
Grades PK-8; Enrollment: 450+
9400 Neenah Avenue
512-246-4455
www.holyfamilycs.org
catholic, christ-centered school with a “nurturing
environment that fosters the growth of the child.”
Grades PK-8; Enrollment: 400+
2500 Wimberly Lane
512-327-7755
www.sgs-austin.org
St. Gabriel’s catholic School “celebrates the
individuality of each child and cultivates virtue,
excellence, leadership, and service.”
12. St. Michael’s Catholic Academy
Grades 9-12; Enrollment: 400
3000 Barton Creek Blvd.
512-328-2323
www.smca.com
college prep school; “academic excellence
combined with faith formation.”
13. Trinity Episcopal School
20. Strickland Christian School
21. St. Austin Catholic School
Grades K-8; Enrollment: 208
1911 San Antonio Street
512-477-3751
www.staustinschool.org
elementary / middle school opened in 1917;
affiliated with St. austin church.
22. St. Martin’s Lutheran Day School
Grades K-8; Enrollment: 400
3901 Bee Cave Road
512-472-9525
www.trinitykids.com
a school in which students are “engaged
spiritually, physically, intellectually, and
academically;” daily chapel services.
Grades 18 months-K; Enrollment: 190
606 West 15th Street
512-476-4037
www.saintmartins.org
balanced, integrated education programs;
music, art, computers and Spanish.
14. Austin Waldorf School
Grades PreK3-K; Enrollment: 170+
209 West 27th Street
512-472-8866
www.allsaints-austin.org/aseds.htm
espiscopal school that is focused on “learning
through active exploration.”
Grades PK-12; Enrollment: 380+
8700 South View Road
512-288-5942
www.austinwaldorf.org
Grades K-12; Focus on balancing “academic,
artistic and practical disciplines”
15. St. Louis Catholic School
Grades PK-8; Enrollment: 365
2114 St. Joseph Blvd.
512-454-0384
www.st-louis.org/school.htm
catholic school and community of faith;
affiliated with St. louis King of France catholic
church.
16. Summit Christian Academy
Grades PK-12 (Cedar Park campus) and 2-4 year
old program at the Leander and Steiner Ranch
Locations); Enrollment: 425
2121 Cypress Creek Road;
512-250-1369 (Cedar Park)
1303 Leander Drive;
512-259-4416 (Leander)
www.summiteagles.org
curriculum includes “rigorous academics,
training in biblical character, and engagement in
servanthood;” affiliated with Shoreline christian
School at the high school level.
17. Austin Montessori School
Grades: Preschool-8; Enrollment: 280
5006 Sunset Trail (Main campus)
512-892-0253
6817 Great Northern Blvd.
(Great Northern campus)
512-450-1940
5676 Oak Blvd.
www.austinmontessori.org
Ages 14 months–9 years; Association Montessori
Internationale curriculum.
18. Shoreline Christian School
Grades PK-12; Enrollment: 275+
15201 Burnet Road
512-310-7358
www.shorelinechristianschool.org
christian-based education; school partnered
with Summit christian academy as start of effort
to create a christian school district.
23. All Saints Episcopal School
24. St. Paul Lutheran School
Grades PK3-8; Enrollment: 165+
3407 Red River Street
512-472-3313
www.stpaulaustin.org
Elementary/middle school; opened in 1893;
affiliated with St. Paul Lutheran Church.
25. The Children’s School
Grades PK-4; Enrollment: 155
2825 Hancock Drive
512-453-1126
www.thechildrensschool.org
Montessori-based curriculum, open since 1979.
http://www.austinrelocationguide.com

21. Colleges and Universities
Higher Education Choices in Austin
Fortune magazine once named Austin one of the country’s top five “intellectual capitals,” and it’s no
wonder. Forbes has ranked Austin the third-biggest “brain magnet” city, and Kiplinger’s Personal Finance
ranks the university of Texas at Austin among its “Best Values in Public Colleges” list. And, according to an
American Community Survey, Austin ranks fifth in the number of college graduates, with 45 percent of the
population holding a degree.
Many of those degrees are awarded right here in Central Texas. That’s because Austin’s thriving intellectual
capital attracts students from across the country and internationally to attend one of the city’s noted
colleges and universities. In fact, the business, law and engineering schools at the university of Texas have
all earned regular spots on Hispanic Business magazine’s lists of top ten schools for Hispanics.
Getting a quality education outside the area is easy, too, with many prestigious colleges and universities
within 100 miles of Austin. These schools include Baylor university (Waco); Texas A&M university (College
Station); Trinity university (San Antonio); Central Texas College (Killeen); Texas Lutheran university (Seguin);
university of Mary Hardin-Baylor (Belton); Our Lady of the Lake university (San Antonio); Texas State Technical
College (Waco) St. Mary’s university, (San Antonio); university of Texas at San Antonio (San Antonio);
Temple College (Temple); and the university of Texas Health Science Center (San Antonio).
Add these schools to what’s already here in Austin, and it’s easy to see how more than
100,000 undergraduate students and more than 18,000 degrees conferred each year are
right here in Central Texas.
The following is an overview of Austin’s major colleges and universities, including
school history, degree programs and enrollment, tuition and fees (not including
room/board), and contact information.

22. Colleges and Universities
Austin Community College
5930 Middle Fiskville Road
austin, tX 78752
512-223-4acc (4222)
www.austincc.edu
The Austin Independent School District established Austin Community
College in 1973. Now governed by an independent board, ACC has grown to
six campuses, plus the Highland Business Center and Downtown Center, as
well as 40 teaching locations throughout Austin and surrounding areas. ACC
also provides contracted training to many local high tech companies, and the
school’s Highland Business Center and Downtown Center are involved in the
development of course work and training specifically designed for Austin industries like high tech, government and manufacturing. ACC offers 235
degrees and certificates, including two-year Associate of Arts and Associate
of Science degrees in 30-plus university transfer majors, and Associate
of Applied Science degrees and certificates in more than 80 technical fields,
as well as an Associate of Arts in Teaching program. ACC is also the leading
source of transfer students to the university of Texas-Austin and Texas State
university-San Marcos, and is the top choice for high school graduates and
adults who enter college.
ACC enrolls more than 44,000 credit students, with an additional 15,000
students enrolled in noncredit classes. One-year tuition and fees (30
credits) is $1,740 in-district, and $4,980 for out-of-district tuition.
Baylor university Executive MBA
oak creek Plaza
3107 oak creek Drive, Suite 240
austin, tX 78729
www.baylor.edu/aeMba
Baylor university offers a 21-month Executive MBA Program in Austin,
admitting up to a maximum of just 40 industry professionals each year.
Classes are held on Monday and Thursday evenings, and the Baylor EMBA
program is AACSB-accredited. Senior faculty members, department chairs,
deans, and industry leaders all have years of experience as instructors.
Baylor executive MBA graduates complete 48 credit hours over five
semesters and 21 months in a curriculum designed to strengthen analytical
and managerial skills. Areas of study include finance, economics, management, accounting, strategy, and more. Students also take a 9-day trip for to
Asia unique perspective on the global marketplace.
The cost of the Baylor Executive MBA Program in Austin for those entering in
August 2011 is $73,500, which includes a $2,000 non-refundable deposit (the
deposit is also “deferrable” for one year to include entry in fall 2012). The cost
includes graduate tuition and student fees for 48 credit hours, a week-long
residency program in Waco (including hotel and meals), a fully-configured
laptop computer and wireless Internet access, all books, case studies, and
other instructional materials, a 5-day trip to Washington, D.C. (including air,
lodging and most meals), a 9-day international trip to Asia (including lodging
and most meals, as well as the flight between two cities in the middle of the
trip), parking and meeting facilities at the Austin campus, and meals and
snacks each class evening.
Concordia university
11400 concordia university Drive
austin, tX 78726
512-313-3000
www.concordia.edu
Concordia university at Austin is a small, private liberal arts and sciences
school offering both undergraduate and graduate degrees. Founded in 1926,
Concordia university is part of the Concordia university System and focuses
on quality, Christ-centered, Lutheran higher education for lives of service to
Church and community; the school’s mission is to develop Christian leaders.
Concordia is affiliated with the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod; however,
all faiths are welcome.
Concordia offers 18 undergraduate majors in four colleges: Business, Education,
Liberal Arts, and Sciences, as well as a Master of Education and Master of
Business Administration graduate degrees. Concordia also offers both adult
degree and distance learning programs for part-time and adult returning students.
Enrollment was approximately 2,100 (as of May 2011). Off-campus tuition and
fees for the fall and spring semesters was $22,920; room and board for the fall
and spring semester was $8,460; and the on-campus total for the fall and
spring semesters was $31,380.
Huston-Tillotson university
900 chicon St.
austin, tX 78702-2795
512-505-3000
www.htu.edu
Huston-Tillotson university is an independent, church-based, historically black
school that is affiliated with the united Methodist Church, the united Church
of Christ, and the united Negro College Fund. The school’s mission is to
“provide opportunities to a diverse population for academic achievement
with an emphasis on academic excellence, spiritual and ethical development,
civic engagement, and leadership in a nurturing environment.”
The Austin campus is located on 23 acres near downtown Austin; the college
also owns 12 acres of property adjacent to the campus for future expansion
and development, as well as a biological field station south of the city
that faculty and students use for environmental research.
The school awards four-year undergraduate degrees in business, education,
the humanities, natural sciences, social sciences, science, and technology. The
general college curriculum is focused on providing “a diverse student body
with an exemplary education that is grounded in the liberal arts and sciences,
balanced with professional development, and directed to public service and
leadership.”
The average class size is 24, and classes are intentionally small to provide
personalized attention to students. Enrollment as of May 2011 was 785.
Annual in- tuition and fees for full-time undergraduates in 2009-2010 was
$11,434; books and supplies were $800; on-campus room and board was
$6,744; and miscellaneous expenses totaled $2,252.
Park university
10415 Morado Circle,
Avallon II, Suite 100
Austin, Tx 78759
512-385-PARK (7275)
www.park.edu (main)
Founded in 1875 with its main campus in Parkville, Missouri, Park university
is part of the university’s School for Extended Learning. An independent,
private, Christian school offering students a four-year, liberal arts
education in a co-educational environment, Park university is accredited
by the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools. Park university
has 43 campus centers in 21 states, as well as an extensive online program.

23. Colleges and Universities
The Austin campus was established in 1975 at the former Bergstrom Air
Force Base, founded to meet the educational needs of primarily military
members and their dependents, as well as civilians. That’s still the case
today; the Austin campus is part of the Park university School for
Extended Learning, which offers online classes and flexible schedules.
Park university offers several online degree options, including two-year
associate of science degrees (computer science, management and
management/accounting); four-year bachelor of science degrees (computer science, management, management/accounting, management
computer information systems, management/human resources, management
marketing, and social psychology), plus six graduate programs, also online.
Tuition is $316/credit hour at all campuses and $441/credit hour for graduate school. Active duty military tuition ranges from $193-$210/credit
hour, and the school’s nursing program is $20,437 per year. Internet
courses are $316/credit hour for civilians; $210/credit hour for active duty
military; and $441/credit hour for online graduate courses.
Southwestern was also the second university in Texas to sign the Talloires
Declaration, a green and sustainable practice initiative that includes a
green residence hall, computer-based effluent water irrigation systems,
alternative transportation programs, use of sustainable/recycled products, low/no maintenance building finishes and products, low-volume
shower heads, and LEED certification on new construction projects.
The school is known for its solid liberal arts curriculum, including the
Brown College of Arts and Sciences and the Sarofim School of Fine Arts.
The university also has pre-professional programs in engineering, medicine,
law, business, education and theology.
Degrees offered include a bachelor of arts, bachelor of science, bachelor
of music, and bachelor of fine arts; no graduate degrees or programs are
offered. Enrollment as of 2010-2011 was 1,301, and annual tuition and fees
for full-time students (12 credit hours) was $31,630.
Texas State university – San Marcos
St. Edward’s university
3001 S. Congress Ave.
Austin, Tx 78704
512-448-8400
www.stedwards.edu
St. Edward’s university is a private, Catholic liberal arts college that was
founded in 1885 by the Reverend Edward Sorin, Superior General of the
Congregation of Holy Cross, who also founded the university of Notre
Dame.
St. Edward’s emphasizes critical thinking, ethical practice, an international
perspective, and a liberal arts education, as well as small classes, personal
attention, study abroad programs, and service-learning opportunities.
u.S. News & World Report has ranked the school as one of “America’s
Best Colleges” for the last eight years; Forbes and the Center for College
Affordability have also named St. Edward’s among “America’s Best Colleges.”
St. Edward’s offers undergraduate degrees in more than 50 areas and
five schools, including humanities, education, natural sciences, management and business, and behavioral and social sciences, as well as 10 graduate degree programs. The school also offers programs in pre-law,
pre-medicine, pre-dentistry, engineering and physical therapy, as well as
elementary, secondary and bilingual/ bicultural education certifications.
Enrollment for 2011 was about 5,300. The school’s full-time (12-18 credit
hours) flat rate per semester for undergraduate tuition in fall 2011-spring
2012 was $14,150.
Southwestern university
1001 E. university Avenue
Georgetown, Tx 78626
512-863-6511
www.southwestern.edu
Located just 28 miles north of Austin in Georgetown, Southwestern university was the first institution of higher learning in Texas, chartered by
the Republic of Texas in 1840. Affiliated with the united Methodist church,
Southwestern is an independent four-year undergraduate national liberal
arts college whose mission is to “foster a liberal arts community whose
values and actions encourage contributions toward the well-being of humanity.”
601 university Drive
San Marcos, Tx 78666
512-245-2111
www.txstate.edu
Texas State university is located in San Marcos - a scenic Hill Country
community about halfway between Austin and San Antonio on the San
Marcos River. Formerly known as Southwest Texas State university, the
school was founded in 1899 as Southwest Texas Normal College, in
response to the state’s need for trained public school teachers. The
school changed its name to Texas State university – San Marcos in 2003
and is the fifth-largest public university in Texas with more than 32,000
students (including about 4,300 graduate students).
Texas State is also an NCAA Division I university (Division I-AA in football;
2005 Southland Conference champions) that supports 7 men’s and 9
women’s sports. The school has also been a regular on u.S. News & World
Report’s “America’s Best Colleges” list for the last several years.
The school offers 97 bachelor’s, 89 master’s, and nine doctoral degree
programs in nine colleges, including applied arts, business administration,
education, fine arts and communication, health professions, liberal arts,
science, university College (general studies), and the Graduate College.
Full-time (12 hours), in-state, undergraduate tuition and fees for fall 2010
was $3,390; full-time, in-state, graduate tuition and fees for fall 2010 was
$3,900.
university of Texas at Austin
1 university Station
Austin, Tx 78712
512-475-7348
www.utexas.edu
Founded in 1883, the university of Texas at Austin (uT Austin) is the
largest component of The university of Texas System – a conglomerate
of 15 academic and health institutions – and the largest institution of
higher education in the Austin area. With more than 51,000 students (including 11,000 graduate students), and about 24,000 faculty and staff
members, uT is one of the largest public universities in the u.S.
uT Austin offers more than 170 fields of study and 100 majors across
undergraduate and graduate programs in 17 colleges and schools, awarding more than 12,000 degrees each year – including more than 8,700
bachelor’s degree and 3,500-plus graduate degrees. Enrollment as of fall
2010 was 51,195, and annual tuition and fees were $8,936 for in-state undergraduate students.
Besides top-notch research facilities, including the fifth-largest academic
library in the country, uT Austin is also famous for Longhorns’ sports and
is a member of both the NCAA and the Big 12 Conference. In football,
uT’s a winner of four national titles (1963, 1969, 1970 and 2005) and ranks
third in NCAA all-time victories.

24. Where Austin Closes
www.austintitle.com
Josh Williams
VP/Director of Business Development
josh.williams@austintitle.com
512.632.7507 Mobile
Branch Location Map
George Birge
Commercial Business Development
george.birge@austintitle.com
Oatmeal
512.431.5570 Mobile
Visit our website at www.austintitle.com to view a list of closers at each location.
201
29
200
Will
iam
Rock
House
r
Sawyer
Park
2338
Lake
Georgetown
ay 190A
ew
Lak Dr
Will
r
sD
1869
Liberty
Hill
1869
29
1174
Rd
Pk
wy
ve
ther
Blvd wilde
nD
in Blvd
Ed Blueste
rop
Rd
Mckinney Falls
State Park
973
2325
St
Old
Lo
183
12
Tina Fucile
Business Development
tina.fucile@alamotitle.com
512.789.7912 Mobile
150
Pioneer
Town
Hill
Sloan St
Harri
s
St
P
TRO
W
EL
6. Round LRock
810 Hesters Crossing, Ste. 155, Round Rock, Tx 78681
512.244.2266
nto
an A
O ld S
21
150
4. Downtown
1717 W. 6th Street, Ste. 105, Austin, Tx 78703
512.329.0777
21
2001
812
Lytton
Springs
ve
h
Rd
Gro
Hig
672
Rockne
7. Bastrop
696 Hwy 71 W., Bldg. 2, Ste. B, Bastrop, Tx 78602
512.303.9633
1854
127
St
nio
172
1854
Mendoza
Kyle
3. North
9600 N. MoPac Expwy., Ste. 125, Austin, Tx 78759
512.459.7222
Blanco
River
BAS
535
2001
Niederwald
20
21
LD
21
131
122
Cedar
Creek
812
d
35
157
21 71
Ln
5. Westlake
3520 Bee Caves Rd., Ste. 250, Austin, Tx 78746
CA
512.306.0988
Creedmoor
Center St
Wimberley
Rd
rce
Maha
1327
7
Pea
2. Northwest
3708 Spicewood Springs Rd. , Ste. 100, Austin, Tx 78759
512.346.4020
Rd
969
Wyldwood
Elroy
2770
81
812
Rd
d
Rd
eron
1209
r
Goforth Rd
Reb
Cam
Rd
her
Finc
71
eD
183
son
Buda
Mountain
City
el
Elysium
Wat
er
Spring R
Fischer
3237
Ln
Moores
Crossing
Rd
sW
e
ey
b
Jaco
Lexington
Dr
Sprin
gs
Pilot
Knob
Pilot
Knob
Colto
Sprin n Bluf
gs f
Rd
enzi
Sequoyah
St
Val
l
Colorado
River
Utley
Pear
ce
1185
20
Rd
Dove Dr
2325
Garfield
71
r
tR
Business Development
Woodcreek
pamela.carroll@austintitle.com
214.738.9888 Mobile
Hw
y
Bergstrom
AFRS
Austin-Bergstrom
International Airport
Mustang
Ridge
Hays
City
au Rd
Dess
ols
Cr
Nuck
no
har
Old Kyle Rd
Hea
Sprin
kl
Rd e
ossin
rle
ck
d
ll R
e Rd
gdal
Sprin
Bu
969
River
Bast
McK
Turnersville
81
Pam Carroll
au Rd
Rd
topo
Dr lis
Mon
d
1625
Main
Old Kyle Rd
Dess
vd
ar Bl
Lam
eron
m
Dr an
Berk
Rd
or
Man
e Rd
gdal
Plea
Valle sant
y Rd
Todd
Ln
oR
Onion
Creek
1626
967
1626
Cam
er
Rd on
Cam
vd
ar Bl
Lam
e St
er St
Re
d R iv
alup
Guada
lupe
St
San Jac
into
Blvd
g Rd
Elm
Colorado
71
183
1. Cedar Park
901 Cypress Creek Road, Ste. 204, Cedar Park, Tx 78613
512.823.2800 office
244
eil
McN
t Dr
hers
Rd
Burnet
wy
ac Ex
d
d
e Blv
Whit
35
150
12
Webberville
ger
Rd
1626
967
218
Can
Shady
Acres Dr
Hays
170
Rd
130
Clin
Driftwood
anor
973
Ben
1704
eM
Bo
yd
Manchaca
Blak
969
Dr
n
Nuck
ols
Cros
sing
Rd
Bluff
Springs
San
Leanna
Frate Barker Rd
969
Colorado River
so
Salt
Slaughter
Ln
od
Lakewo Dr
Business Development
ashley.boyd@austintitle.com
512.422.6385 Mobile
Creek B
Shoal
Edwards
Hollow Run
1826
Hollow
St
St
Blvd
E Sa
Stassney Ln
iam
Ln
Tanglewood
Forest
n Rd
162
Ben White
Will
Bluff Springs Rd
Brow
Garden Hill Rd
avez
int
275
2304
150
71
Dittmar Rd
Slau
ghter
7th
r Ch
de
Dr
aca
Rd
Man
ch
Brod
ie Ln
is Ln
Huston Tillotson
College
Cong
ress
m
Willia
1
Mount
Gainor
220
Guad
Expo
S 1s
Ln
E 2n
183
Blvd
er King
111
Rosewo
Cesa
rL
Dav
12th St
od Ave
St
d St
St
Elgin
Walter E
Long Lake
Anch
or
Ln
35
St
Daffan
973
Martin Luth
2nd
290
ersi
Cong
Stas
sney
hte
45
Nutty
164
MLK
Blv
15th d
St
State
Capitol11th
Saint Edwards
University
t St
ress
Ave
d
Cann
on
ug
St
Ln
Littig
Riv
Will
iam
38th
St
rf St
sR
n
Dripping
Springs
Ave
Ln
on
Tarlt
Sunset
Valley
Rd
Circle C
Golf Club
290
Am
Dr
Knoll
Oak
Yaupon Dr
a Dr
Mes
Mop
r
sD
cone
or
ad
Col
Bal
Pecos St
si
Blvd tion
oR
iver
nava
Cuer
N River H
ills R
d
ek
Blvd
W Fitzh
tB
lvd
Hill
Beck
et
Rd t
ict
Georgeto
wn
St
Sunrise Rd
Dr
Oaks
Great
Pe
Cree can
k Pk
wy
Pickfair Dr
Blvd
Place
River
t Cre
ek Rd
gr
Lp een
Win
ca Dr
Wal
sh
Ham
ugh Rd
Esc
arp m
Sla
1826
290
45th
Olto
Ben White
Blvd
Jone
Conv
en
Davis
Ln
on
ig Ln
51st
St
Main
290
290
ons
St
Pars
Old Hwy 20
Ln
ers
Highland
Mall
Koen
Sprin
rK
Trl
Gr
r Ave
thu
Mc
ock Rd
rs-Peac
Reime
Brooks
Ranch Rd
Rd
in Rd
utwe
Tra
Cedar
Vallley
Blv
am
SL
Lamar Blvd
Manor
uson
Bastrop Hwy
Tim
be
Trl r
C F Wall Ln
Eagle Bluff Rd
Rd
Cannon Dr
d
ar
Oak
Hill
Ln
Blvd
es
290
Rd
1100
Rd
Ca
Rd Run
db
erg
Dr
Cav
ugh
Gin
And
2222
de
r
le D
Circ
Fitzh
12
Lund
or
Ferg
ersi
Bee
Fitzhugh Rd
Fitzhugh
187
Old
Circleville
Rd
95
Manda
Man
Rd
meron
Airport
ings
Dessau
gg
on
Ln
Austin
Municipal
Auditorium
Ln
734
in Ln
24th St University
of Texas
1st St
Spr
er
Just
Riv
Travis Cook
ton
Yag
275
New
Sweden
St Bastrop St
La Gran
ge St
Roun
dM
ount
ain
Rd
y
Bar
1
973
130
Ln
Taylor Rd
2244
nde
s Hw
360
om
st Rd
ow
Dr
Payt
lv
12th
St
6th
5th St
St
Rio Gra
St
d
le Ea
Rd
dR
ervil
nor
fiel
Pflug
ke Ma
Texa
Los
t Cre
Sou
thwe
st P
kwy
4
En
Rollingwood
n St
Bla
r
eD
Lak
rville
Pfluge ck Rd
Ro
Round
c
W
95
Peca
Pflugerville
Gre
land
Airport
Blvd
5
1825
Coupland
685
Ln
Rut
rch
Resea
Blvd
l Of
as d
R
Th ngs
ri
Sp
e
k Rd
ave
s
Rd
pita
S Ca
Lakeway
Airpark
k Av
rson
St
nig
EH
er Ln
Cree
ee
C
stin
Au
Lake Blvd
Lost
Creek
Barton Creek Resort
Golf Course
71
th
35
Brak
Bull
nic
ce
SW
inds
Rd or
dT
Redbu
101
1325
Perr Hanco
y
ck D
Ln
r
35
kw y
Coxville
Stec
R
Dr
1466
Lo
op
ard
le
Jollyvil
Rd
Mount Rd
ll
Bonne
Dr
West Lake
Hills
l Rd
ks
Broo h Rd
nc
Ra
101
Lake
rl
oo
ilton P
s
ig
Spr
W
B
3238
ol Rd
Spicew
s
on
mm Rd
rd
Fo
Co
620
Bee Cave
AVP/Business Development
leslie.linder@austintitle.com
512.415.6706 Mobile
ran
R
Village of
the Hills
ille
Pfen
734
University
of Texas
Rices
Crossing
1660
Rowe Ln
Pflu
Windemere
Wells B
Kings
Village
1
Ande
Far
W
Blvd est
360
2244
ton Po
n
Park
d
os
s
3238
Hamil
Ca
2
o od
al Bull Creek
pit
N
eway Blvd
Dr
71
Hw
ns
Visio
Dr
gs
rin
Ham
as
x
Te
Of
River Place
Golf Club
Rd
ing
ills
Th e H
rsg
Ru
n
Dr Dee ning
r Tr
l
d
3
y
2222
al R
Blvd
n
wy
Rai k Pk
Cree
d
sC
620
Marshall
Ford
Duv
95
Priem Ln
45
gerv
hP
183
Research
d
Sp
mans Cr
Loh
Lak
met
Ashley Boyd
e wo o
Lakeway Resort
Golf Course
Ham
bba
Hurs
Lakeway
296
Will Gen
iam eral
so
nD
r
Buffalo
Gap De
o
nim
Gero Trl
re
Ventu
Blvd
Bee Creek Rd
Pedernales River
190
eR
ic
Sp
Four
Points
Lake Travis
Dr
er Ln
d
Point
Venture
302
Rd
Lampas
lum
l
as Tr
Rd
end Rd
Briarcliff
eil
Blvd
Grand A
Wells
Branch
McN
W Pa
973
3349
130
Henna
1325
rm
sP
Ol d
llow
nB
Pedernales River
620
is
Mopac Lou
Exwy
il Dr
McNe
Texa
k Ho
Highland Lake Dr
71
Pool
Lake
Dr
Travis
Hudso
AVP/Business Development
BLANCO
jenny.newman@austintitle.com
512.426.7865 Mobile
Ar
2769
Volente
Bullic
2322
Malberger
Park
Arkansas Bend
Park
Boggy Ford Rd
olm
ish Dr
Ch lley
Va
Exwy
Lago
Vista
am
ish
ing Rd
oss
Lohmans Cr
71
171
619
Normans
Crossing
137
pac
r
685
E Logan St
Gattis School Rd
N Mo
nD
Jenny Newman
wy
734
k Pk
Cree
Jollyville
Lake
Anderson
e Dr
P
Mill d ond
Chas
Dr
R
nters
Sp
las
Anderson Mill
rin Hu
Dal
gs
Rd
TRAVIS
Daw
m Va
Forest Creek
Golf Club
lawn
Green d
Blv
vd
183
112
e
172
45
Lakeline
Mall
Barton Creek
Resort
Red Bud Ln
St
6
ll Bl
Cree
1431
Ba
Spicewood
Mays
Brushy
Creek
S Be
ess
Cypr
St
Rd
Blvd
d.
kR
d
R
ek
Lime Cre
Frame
Switch
79
ad Av
Bagd
The Market
Mall
620
79
BUS
79
1660
d
Blv
lley
St
Bass
Bell
R
rcup
Butte Blvd
k
Cree
1
Jonestown
Round
Rock Ave
Taylor
79
Hutto
Pal
Taylor Ave
174
d
Brushy Creek R
183A
Cedar
Park
North
Sam
s Rd
734
Whit
Davis
Rd
Rd
Nameles
Creek
1431
d
e Blv
eston
1431
Rusty
Allen Airport
Rang
er Tr
l
WILLIAMSON
1460
rs
Dr
Walnut St
1660
Old Settle
Blvd
3406
Lake
7th St
4th St
2nd St
Taylor Municipal
Airport
117
Round
Rock
Leander
191
Leslie Linder
1431
St
s Burkett St
Jone
Main St
St
ad
112
2243
d
a nc h R
ore
Gilm
130
2243
Travis
Peak
Lake
Travis
397
se Rd
1431
Spicewood
Business Development
Beach
roxanne.ford@austintitle.com
512.771.1195 Mobile
110
Montadale
ghou
lls
tal Fa
Crys wy
Pk
Roxanne Ford
ilton
619
107
tin
Wes
Nameless
Pedernales
River
Waterloo
Circleville
1660
100
35
Cow
1431
Business Development
HA
YS
cheryl.scully@austintitle.com
512.632.5136 Mobile
29
1460
175
2243
h St
Sout
Sandy
Creek
Cheryl Scully
Jonah
15th St
Lean
1431
962
18th
St
2243
Smithwick
Paul
Neumann Ln
Rd
der
29
University Ave
Bagd
AVP/Business Development
becky.hopkins@austintitle.com
512.656.7095 Mobile
Hoxie
1331
Austin
Ave
Becky Hopkins
Granger Lake
Wilson H
Fox Park
120
2nd St
College St
183
Railroad
St
MLK St
Austin Ave
279
Wills Creek
Park
95
San Gabriel
Park
Georgetown
Middle Fork San
Gabriel River
282
971
Weir
8
iam
BURNET
1105
Georgetown
Municipal
Airport
Jim Hogg
Park
ort Rd
Airp
1869
Serenada
sD
Walnut Spring
Park
Austin
Ave
1174
243
812
Watterson
535
8. Georgetown
501 Austin Avenue, Ste. 1115, Georgetown, Tx 78628
512.423.3291