The document describes the development of a poststroke checklist (PSC) to help healthcare providers identify long-term problems in stroke survivors and facilitate appropriate referrals for treatment. An international group of stroke experts generated a list of long-term poststroke problems. Using a Delphi method, 11 key problem areas were identified and included in the PSC, including secondary prevention, activities of daily living, mobility, spasticity, pain, incontinence, communication, mood, cognition, life after stroke, and relationship with caregiver. The goal of the PSC is to standardize long-term care for stroke survivors and improve their quality of life.
Barriers to access of quality renal replacement therapy in endstage renal dis...iosrjce
IOSR Journal of Nursing and health Science is ambitious to disseminate information and experience in education, practice and investigation between medicine, nursing and all the sciences involved in health care.
Nursing & Health Sciences focuses on the international exchange of knowledge in nursing and health sciences. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers on original research, education and clinical practice.
By encouraging scholars from around the world to share their knowledge and expertise, the journal aims to provide the reader with a deeper understanding of the lived experience of nursing and health sciences and the opportunity to enrich their own area of practice.The journal publishes original papers, reviews, special and general articles, case management etc.
Study of Barthel Score among CKD Patients Belonging from Tribal Areas in Tert...ijtsrd
Chronic Kidney Disease CKD is one of the independent diseases which can lead to sever disability and it is a major emerging public health concern worldwide because it often leads to poor patient outcome 1 . Some of the associated factor with impaired functional status with CKD patients has not been fully elucidated, but some traditional such as cardiovascular diseases hypertension, myocardial ischemia , cerebrovascular diseases, and diabetes mellitus as well as non-traditional factors such as malnutrition-inflammation syndrome and depression may involve. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study has shown that risk of low functional status is directly proportional to kidney impairment 2, 3 . Thus, individuals with chronic kidney disease CKD have 40-70 higher risk of functional limitation than those without CKD 4 . In one study to assess the functional status of the CKD patients by using Barthel index found that 50 patients were dependent for the basic activities of daily life 5 In the current study, we hypothesize that there is a close relationship between the presence of CKD and the functional status of renal patients. We conducted this study with objective to assess the functional status of patients with Chronic Kidney Disease by using Barthel Index as a assessment tool on patients who were admitted under Nephrology Unite of Dr. B.R.A.M Hospital Raipur, CG. Dr. Dolly Ajwani Ratre | Rashmi Nande | Navin Kumar Ratre "Study of Barthel Score among CKD Patients Belonging from Tribal Areas in Tertiary Care Hospital, Chhattisgarh" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-3 | Issue-2 , February 2019, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd20266.pdf
Paper URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/medicine/other/20266/study-of-barthel-score-among-ckd-patients-belonging-from-tribal-areas-in-tertiary-care-hospital-chhattisgarh/dr-dolly-ajwani-ratre
This study aimed to investigate the effect of a learning guideline on nurses' knowledge and performance regarding patient safety after cardiac catheterization. A quasi-experimental design was used with 51 nurses from cardiac units. Nurses' knowledge and performance were assessed before and after implementing a 4-week learning guideline program using questionnaires and checklists. The results showed that nurses had significantly higher knowledge scores after the learning guideline, with a positive correlation between qualification, experience, and post-guideline knowledge. Nurses' performance scores were satisfactory both before and after the guideline, but there was a strong positive correlation between qualification and post-guideline performance. In conclusion, the learning guideline improved nurses' knowledge regarding patient safety after cardiac catheterization.
Multi-Disciplinary Renal Clinic Presentation to Exec LeadershipTJ O'Neil
This document proposes a patient-aligned kidney care model that utilizes a multidisciplinary team approach to manage chronic kidney disease (CKD). It argues that the current model of standalone nephrology clinics is outdated. A multidisciplinary team that includes nephrologists, nurses, dieticians, pharmacists, and social workers could more effectively manage CKD patients, slow disease progression, reduce costs, and improve outcomes. Implementing this model could save the VA money by decreasing hospital admissions, increasing transplant rates, and lowering overall costs of treatment like dialysis.
Impaled roadside guardrail in the neck: Case of a failed motorcycle stuntAhmad Ozair
Trauma is currently the leading cause of death in the age group 15 to 44 years globally, with road trauma now representing the sixth leading cause of death worldwide. We present a case of a young male, who was brought to the apex trauma centre of the province with a metallic roadside guardrail impaled in his neck up to his oral cavity, which had to be cut to transport him to the hospital. A meticulous local exploration resulted in the successful removal of the spiked guardrail, with no damage to critical structures. We discuss the paradigm changes in and the expertise required for the management of such penetrating neck injuries (PNIs). For family physicians, this case represents one of the wide variety of cases they will be called to help upon and administer prehospital care. Thus, utilization of principles of basic life support, recognition of the severity of road trauma cases, and ensuring urgency of referral by general practitioners are all critical.
The 2015 AHA Guidelines update for CPR and ECC consists of 15 parts that were published to update recommendations based on new evidence or ongoing controversies since the 2010 guidelines. Key changes include a new Part 4 on systems of care and quality improvement, and a new Part 14 on education. The guidelines transitioned to a web-based format for continuous updating going forward. The evidence review process was also changed from a 5-year cycle to continuous evaluation to more rapidly translate new science into practice. The overall goal is to double bystander CPR rates and cardiac arrest survival by 2020.
This document provides a commentary from the National Kidney Foundation–Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-KDOQI) on the 2012 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of CKD. The commentary work group agreed with most recommendations in the KDIGO guideline, including retaining the definition of CKD and incorporating albuminuria stages into CKD classification. However, some concerns were raised about including cause of disease in CKD staging and issues with GFR estimation and measuring albuminuria in practice. The commentary aims to help US practitioners interpret and apply the KDIGO guideline recommendations.
This clinical practice guideline from the Renal Association provides recommendations for managing anaemia of chronic kidney disease. It summarizes guidelines on evaluating and diagnosing anaemia, treating anaemia with iron therapy, and treating anaemia with erythropoiesis stimulating agents. Key recommendations include routinely screening for anaemia in CKD patients, treating iron deficiency prior to or when initiating ESA therapy, using intravenous iron for most haemodialysis patients, and targeting a haemoglobin level of 100-120 g/L for adults on ESA therapy. The guideline is based on a review of the literature from 2009 to 2016.
Barriers to access of quality renal replacement therapy in endstage renal dis...iosrjce
IOSR Journal of Nursing and health Science is ambitious to disseminate information and experience in education, practice and investigation between medicine, nursing and all the sciences involved in health care.
Nursing & Health Sciences focuses on the international exchange of knowledge in nursing and health sciences. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers on original research, education and clinical practice.
By encouraging scholars from around the world to share their knowledge and expertise, the journal aims to provide the reader with a deeper understanding of the lived experience of nursing and health sciences and the opportunity to enrich their own area of practice.The journal publishes original papers, reviews, special and general articles, case management etc.
Study of Barthel Score among CKD Patients Belonging from Tribal Areas in Tert...ijtsrd
Chronic Kidney Disease CKD is one of the independent diseases which can lead to sever disability and it is a major emerging public health concern worldwide because it often leads to poor patient outcome 1 . Some of the associated factor with impaired functional status with CKD patients has not been fully elucidated, but some traditional such as cardiovascular diseases hypertension, myocardial ischemia , cerebrovascular diseases, and diabetes mellitus as well as non-traditional factors such as malnutrition-inflammation syndrome and depression may involve. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study has shown that risk of low functional status is directly proportional to kidney impairment 2, 3 . Thus, individuals with chronic kidney disease CKD have 40-70 higher risk of functional limitation than those without CKD 4 . In one study to assess the functional status of the CKD patients by using Barthel index found that 50 patients were dependent for the basic activities of daily life 5 In the current study, we hypothesize that there is a close relationship between the presence of CKD and the functional status of renal patients. We conducted this study with objective to assess the functional status of patients with Chronic Kidney Disease by using Barthel Index as a assessment tool on patients who were admitted under Nephrology Unite of Dr. B.R.A.M Hospital Raipur, CG. Dr. Dolly Ajwani Ratre | Rashmi Nande | Navin Kumar Ratre "Study of Barthel Score among CKD Patients Belonging from Tribal Areas in Tertiary Care Hospital, Chhattisgarh" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-3 | Issue-2 , February 2019, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd20266.pdf
Paper URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/medicine/other/20266/study-of-barthel-score-among-ckd-patients-belonging-from-tribal-areas-in-tertiary-care-hospital-chhattisgarh/dr-dolly-ajwani-ratre
This study aimed to investigate the effect of a learning guideline on nurses' knowledge and performance regarding patient safety after cardiac catheterization. A quasi-experimental design was used with 51 nurses from cardiac units. Nurses' knowledge and performance were assessed before and after implementing a 4-week learning guideline program using questionnaires and checklists. The results showed that nurses had significantly higher knowledge scores after the learning guideline, with a positive correlation between qualification, experience, and post-guideline knowledge. Nurses' performance scores were satisfactory both before and after the guideline, but there was a strong positive correlation between qualification and post-guideline performance. In conclusion, the learning guideline improved nurses' knowledge regarding patient safety after cardiac catheterization.
Multi-Disciplinary Renal Clinic Presentation to Exec LeadershipTJ O'Neil
This document proposes a patient-aligned kidney care model that utilizes a multidisciplinary team approach to manage chronic kidney disease (CKD). It argues that the current model of standalone nephrology clinics is outdated. A multidisciplinary team that includes nephrologists, nurses, dieticians, pharmacists, and social workers could more effectively manage CKD patients, slow disease progression, reduce costs, and improve outcomes. Implementing this model could save the VA money by decreasing hospital admissions, increasing transplant rates, and lowering overall costs of treatment like dialysis.
Impaled roadside guardrail in the neck: Case of a failed motorcycle stuntAhmad Ozair
Trauma is currently the leading cause of death in the age group 15 to 44 years globally, with road trauma now representing the sixth leading cause of death worldwide. We present a case of a young male, who was brought to the apex trauma centre of the province with a metallic roadside guardrail impaled in his neck up to his oral cavity, which had to be cut to transport him to the hospital. A meticulous local exploration resulted in the successful removal of the spiked guardrail, with no damage to critical structures. We discuss the paradigm changes in and the expertise required for the management of such penetrating neck injuries (PNIs). For family physicians, this case represents one of the wide variety of cases they will be called to help upon and administer prehospital care. Thus, utilization of principles of basic life support, recognition of the severity of road trauma cases, and ensuring urgency of referral by general practitioners are all critical.
The 2015 AHA Guidelines update for CPR and ECC consists of 15 parts that were published to update recommendations based on new evidence or ongoing controversies since the 2010 guidelines. Key changes include a new Part 4 on systems of care and quality improvement, and a new Part 14 on education. The guidelines transitioned to a web-based format for continuous updating going forward. The evidence review process was also changed from a 5-year cycle to continuous evaluation to more rapidly translate new science into practice. The overall goal is to double bystander CPR rates and cardiac arrest survival by 2020.
This document provides a commentary from the National Kidney Foundation–Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-KDOQI) on the 2012 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of CKD. The commentary work group agreed with most recommendations in the KDIGO guideline, including retaining the definition of CKD and incorporating albuminuria stages into CKD classification. However, some concerns were raised about including cause of disease in CKD staging and issues with GFR estimation and measuring albuminuria in practice. The commentary aims to help US practitioners interpret and apply the KDIGO guideline recommendations.
This clinical practice guideline from the Renal Association provides recommendations for managing anaemia of chronic kidney disease. It summarizes guidelines on evaluating and diagnosing anaemia, treating anaemia with iron therapy, and treating anaemia with erythropoiesis stimulating agents. Key recommendations include routinely screening for anaemia in CKD patients, treating iron deficiency prior to or when initiating ESA therapy, using intravenous iron for most haemodialysis patients, and targeting a haemoglobin level of 100-120 g/L for adults on ESA therapy. The guideline is based on a review of the literature from 2009 to 2016.
CARRE project presentation - November 2013
CARRE is an EU FP7-ICT funded project with the goal to provide innovative means for the management of comorbidities (multiple co-occurring medical conditions), especially in the case of chronic cardiac and renal disease patients or persons with increased risk of such conditions.
Impact of a designed nursing intervention protocol on myocardial infarction p...Alexander Decker
This study examined the impact of a designed nursing intervention protocol on myocardial infarction patients' outcomes at a university hospital in Egypt. Forty adult myocardial infarction patients were included. The study found that after exposure to the nursing intervention protocol, patients had significantly higher total mean knowledge scores and total mean practice scores. It also found that patients had medium to high levels of compliance to lifelong instructions. The results support the hypotheses that the nursing intervention protocol improved patients' knowledge, practices, and compliance. The study concluded that a nursing intervention protocol can have a positive impact on myocardial infarction patient outcomes.
Delivering high quality, equitable care in india an ethically-resilient fram...Ahmad Ozair
Developing countries struggle to provide high-quality, equitable care to all. Challenges of resource allocation frequently lead to ethical concerns of healthcare inequity. To tackle this, such developing nations continually need to implement healthcare innovation, coupled with capacity building to ensure new strategies continue to be developed and executed. The COVID-19 pandemic has made significant demands of healthcare systems across the world-to provide equitable healthcare to all, to ensure public health principles are followed, to find novel solutions for previously unencountered healthcare challenges, and to rapidly develop new therapeutics and vaccines for COVID-19. Countries worldwide have struggled to accomplish these demands, especially the latter two, considering that few nations had long-standing systems in place to ensure processes for innovation were ongoing before the pandemic struck. The crisis represents a critical juncture to plan for a future. This future needs to incorporate a vision for the implementation of healthcare innovation, coupled with capacity building to ensure new strategies continue to be developed and executed. In this paper, the case of the massive Indian healthcare system is utilized to describe how it could implement this vision. An inclusive, ethically-resilient framework has been broadly laid out for healthcare innovation in the future, thereby ensuring success in both the short-and the long-term.
This document discusses medical wait times in Canada. It provides context on wait times as a policy issue and problem. It outlines efforts to address wait times, including the 2004 Health Accord which established benchmarks and funding to reduce waits in key areas by 2007. The 2005 Chaoulli case challenged limits on private insurance and underscored wait times as undermining public support. Provinces then committed to set targets and increase transparency around waits.
Global landscape of glioblastoma multiforme management in the stupp protocol ...Ahmad Ozair
Background: Glioblastoma multiforme is the most common and aggressive primary adult brain neoplasm. The current standard of care is maximal safe surgical resection, radiotherapy with concomitant temozolomide, followed by adjuvant temozolomide according to the Stupp protocol. Although the protocol is well adopted in high-income countries (HICs), little is known about its adoption in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The aim of this study is to describe a protocol design for a systematic review of published studies outlining the differences in GBM management between HICs and LMICs. Methods: A systematic review will be conducted. MedLine via Ovid, Embase and Global Index Medicus will be searched from inception to date in order to identify the relevant studies. Adult patients (>18 years) with histologically confirmed primary unifocal GBM will be included. Surgical and chemoradiation management of GBM tumours will be considered. Commentaries, original research, non-peer reviewed pieces, opinion pieces, editorials and case reports will be included. Results: Primary outcomes will include rates of complications, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), prognosis, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) as well as rate of care abandonment and delay. Secondary outcomes will include the presence of neuro-oncology subspecialty training programs. Discussion: This systematic review will be the first to compare the current landscape of GBM management in HICs and LMICs, highlighting pertinent themes that may be used to optimise treatment in both financial brackets. Systematic Review Registration: The protocol has been registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; registration number: CRD42020215843).
Developing and implementing clinical standards for seven day servicesNHS Improving Quality
Celia Ingham Clark National Director: Reducing Premature Mortality. Slides from Celia's presentation from the 7 Day Services events West Midlands 11th June and East Midlands 12th June 2014
Academic quality of incoming ophthalmology residents in India: Concerns for t...Ahmad Ozair
We note with concern, for ophthalmology, the results of round-1 seat allotment for National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test—Post-Graduation (NEET-PG) 2020, declared in April 2020.[1] Except for a few institutions, all-India ranks (AIRs) on the NEET-PG perform as the sole admission criterion to the majority of residency positions in India, and thereby to a career as specialist. Top rankers here represent the finest candidates offered by our medical education system. Currently, India has 1616 MD/MS, 103 Diploma, and 292 DNB (post-MBBS) positions for ophthalmology training.[2] Unfortunately, top AIRs have continued to ignore ophthalmology, as per last available data since NEET-PG 2017, when the exam began. In 2020, not a single examinee under-100 AIR chose ophthalmology, while seven of top-10 AIRs picked general medicine.[1] Similarly, no more than 2 in top-500 AIR and 10 in top-1000 AIR in each year have chosen ophthalmology. This year also saw the least number of candidates in both top-2500 and top-5000 AIRs choosing ophthalmology [Figure 1].
This document presents a literature review and proposal for a study to evaluate the effectiveness of home telemonitoring using an ECG monitor in reducing hospital readmission rates among patients aged 65 and older with heart failure. Heart failure results in many hospitalizations and readmissions that cost the healthcare system billions each year. The literature suggests that telemonitoring allows for early detection of exacerbations and improved management of heart failure symptoms, leading to fewer hospitalizations. The proposed study would compare readmission rates over 4 months for heart failure patients who use home ECG telemonitoring versus the standard telemonitoring system, with the hypothesis that ECG telemonitoring would reduce readmission rates.
This document provides a summary of the 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines on Management of Dyslipidaemia published by the Ministry of Health Malaysia. It outlines the rationale and process for developing the guidelines, which was to review the evidence linking dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease and develop strategies for assessing and managing dyslipidemia using local healthcare resources. An expert panel developed clinical questions and recommendations based on reviews of clinical trials and guidelines from other organizations. The guidelines are intended to guide healthcare providers in Malaysia on best practices for diagnosing and treating dyslipidemia to reduce cardiovascular risk.
The document discusses a VA initiative using telehealth and phone care to reduce readmission rates for congestive heart failure (CHF) patients. Previously, care coordinators were located off-site, hindering collaboration. The new approach uses home telehealth technology to monitor patients after discharge, telephone care for communication, and evidence-based protocols. This led to lower readmission rates within 4 months - 20 patients using telehealth versus 28 with standard care. Statistical analysis found a significant difference between the telehealth and standard care groups in preventing readmissions. The conclusion is that telehealth and phone care can reduce costs by treating CHF patients at home while improving their experience.
Management of pediatric blunt renal trauma a systematic reviewskrentz
This systematic review examines current practices in managing pediatric blunt renal trauma conservatively. 32 studies met the criteria of including cases of high-grade renal injuries in children. The literature supports applying conservative management protocols including observation, percutaneous drainage, stenting, and angioembolization to high-grade pediatric renal trauma, with short and long-term outcomes generally being favorable.
J2016 - Tecson et al AJC Impact of EECP on Heart Failure RehospitalizationEmily Hu
1) The study assessed the impact of enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) combined with heart failure education on reducing 90-day readmission rates in 99 patients with heart failure due to ischemic cardiomyopathy who began EECP within 90 days of hospital discharge.
2) Only 6 patients (6.1%) had unplanned readmissions within 90 days, which was significantly lower than the predicted rate of 34%. Functional status, walk distance, and symptoms also improved after EECP based on various clinical measures.
3) In conclusion, patients who received EECP and education within 90 days of discharge had significantly lower readmission rates than predicted, and also showed improvements in functional status, walk distance, and symptoms.
The challenge of the end of-life discussion housestaff 2014pkhohl
The document discusses end-of-life care for cancer patients in the United States. It finds that about 1/3 of patients with poor prognosis cancer spend their last days in hospitals and intensive care units. About 10% receive aggressive life-sustaining treatments near death. Use of hospice care varies widely between regions and hospitals, with some providing little or no hospice support. Early discussions about end-of-life care can help patients receive less aggressive care near death that aligns with their goals and values, and helps caregivers cope after death. However, patients have difficulty accepting terminal prognoses, and interventions simply providing prognostic information have not impacted care received or understanding on their own. A long-term process
This study evaluated a brief intervention program aimed at reducing frequent visits to emergency departments in Christchurch, New Zealand. 53 participants who frequently visited the emergency department received a 12-week program including assessments of psychological distress and quality of life. The results found that participants significantly reduced their emergency department visits while maintaining their general practice attendance. They also reported decreased psychological distress and increased quality of life. Although the small sample size limits conclusions about the program's efficacy, the results indicate further development of brief intervention models for emergency departments is warranted.
This study investigated the incidence and causes of acute kidney injury (AKI) in children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a hospital in Bangalore, India using the pediatric RIFLE (pRIFLE) criteria. The main findings were:
1) The incidence of AKI was 26.1%, with most cases being stage 'Risk'. AKI was most common in children under 1 year of age.
2) The leading cause of AKI was infections such as dengue, sepsis, and pneumonia.
3) Risk factors for developing AKI included hypotension, use of nephrotoxic drugs, sepsis, and need for mechanical ventilation. The majority (68%)
Este documento presenta los resultados de la Jornada 23 de un campeonato de fútbol masculino. Incluye los marcadores de los 7 partidos jugados, así como la tabla de posiciones que muestra el número de puntos, partidos jugados, ganados, empatados y perdidos de cada equipo. El equipo líder es F.B. Loriguilla con 64 puntos seguido por C.F. Atlético Quelmo-Manises también con 64 puntos.
La Secretaría de Seguridad Pública (SSP) impuso sellos de suspensión temporal a dos empresas de seguridad privada, Sistemas de Alarmas y Radio Comunicaciones de Oaxaca (RADO) y SEG Puertas Automáticas, Alarmas y Cercas Electrificadas, por no cumplir con la ley del Sistema Estatal de Seguridad Pública de Oaxaca. La SSP supervisará de manera constante a las 29 empresas de seguridad privada para garantizar el cumplimiento de la ley y salvaguardar la seguridad de las
Keduanya, COBIT dan ITIL dapat digunakan untuk melakukan audit IT, namun COBIT dianggap lebih baik karena merupakan standar praktik manajemen TI yang dikeluarkan oleh lembaga otoritatif. COBIT memiliki 4 domain cakupan dan menyediakan kerangka governance serta petunjuk kontrol, sedangkan ITIL lebih menekankan pengelolaan siklus hidup layanan TI. Keduanya memiliki asal usul sejak tahun 1980-an
CARRE project presentation - November 2013
CARRE is an EU FP7-ICT funded project with the goal to provide innovative means for the management of comorbidities (multiple co-occurring medical conditions), especially in the case of chronic cardiac and renal disease patients or persons with increased risk of such conditions.
Impact of a designed nursing intervention protocol on myocardial infarction p...Alexander Decker
This study examined the impact of a designed nursing intervention protocol on myocardial infarction patients' outcomes at a university hospital in Egypt. Forty adult myocardial infarction patients were included. The study found that after exposure to the nursing intervention protocol, patients had significantly higher total mean knowledge scores and total mean practice scores. It also found that patients had medium to high levels of compliance to lifelong instructions. The results support the hypotheses that the nursing intervention protocol improved patients' knowledge, practices, and compliance. The study concluded that a nursing intervention protocol can have a positive impact on myocardial infarction patient outcomes.
Delivering high quality, equitable care in india an ethically-resilient fram...Ahmad Ozair
Developing countries struggle to provide high-quality, equitable care to all. Challenges of resource allocation frequently lead to ethical concerns of healthcare inequity. To tackle this, such developing nations continually need to implement healthcare innovation, coupled with capacity building to ensure new strategies continue to be developed and executed. The COVID-19 pandemic has made significant demands of healthcare systems across the world-to provide equitable healthcare to all, to ensure public health principles are followed, to find novel solutions for previously unencountered healthcare challenges, and to rapidly develop new therapeutics and vaccines for COVID-19. Countries worldwide have struggled to accomplish these demands, especially the latter two, considering that few nations had long-standing systems in place to ensure processes for innovation were ongoing before the pandemic struck. The crisis represents a critical juncture to plan for a future. This future needs to incorporate a vision for the implementation of healthcare innovation, coupled with capacity building to ensure new strategies continue to be developed and executed. In this paper, the case of the massive Indian healthcare system is utilized to describe how it could implement this vision. An inclusive, ethically-resilient framework has been broadly laid out for healthcare innovation in the future, thereby ensuring success in both the short-and the long-term.
This document discusses medical wait times in Canada. It provides context on wait times as a policy issue and problem. It outlines efforts to address wait times, including the 2004 Health Accord which established benchmarks and funding to reduce waits in key areas by 2007. The 2005 Chaoulli case challenged limits on private insurance and underscored wait times as undermining public support. Provinces then committed to set targets and increase transparency around waits.
Global landscape of glioblastoma multiforme management in the stupp protocol ...Ahmad Ozair
Background: Glioblastoma multiforme is the most common and aggressive primary adult brain neoplasm. The current standard of care is maximal safe surgical resection, radiotherapy with concomitant temozolomide, followed by adjuvant temozolomide according to the Stupp protocol. Although the protocol is well adopted in high-income countries (HICs), little is known about its adoption in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The aim of this study is to describe a protocol design for a systematic review of published studies outlining the differences in GBM management between HICs and LMICs. Methods: A systematic review will be conducted. MedLine via Ovid, Embase and Global Index Medicus will be searched from inception to date in order to identify the relevant studies. Adult patients (>18 years) with histologically confirmed primary unifocal GBM will be included. Surgical and chemoradiation management of GBM tumours will be considered. Commentaries, original research, non-peer reviewed pieces, opinion pieces, editorials and case reports will be included. Results: Primary outcomes will include rates of complications, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), prognosis, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) as well as rate of care abandonment and delay. Secondary outcomes will include the presence of neuro-oncology subspecialty training programs. Discussion: This systematic review will be the first to compare the current landscape of GBM management in HICs and LMICs, highlighting pertinent themes that may be used to optimise treatment in both financial brackets. Systematic Review Registration: The protocol has been registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; registration number: CRD42020215843).
Developing and implementing clinical standards for seven day servicesNHS Improving Quality
Celia Ingham Clark National Director: Reducing Premature Mortality. Slides from Celia's presentation from the 7 Day Services events West Midlands 11th June and East Midlands 12th June 2014
Academic quality of incoming ophthalmology residents in India: Concerns for t...Ahmad Ozair
We note with concern, for ophthalmology, the results of round-1 seat allotment for National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test—Post-Graduation (NEET-PG) 2020, declared in April 2020.[1] Except for a few institutions, all-India ranks (AIRs) on the NEET-PG perform as the sole admission criterion to the majority of residency positions in India, and thereby to a career as specialist. Top rankers here represent the finest candidates offered by our medical education system. Currently, India has 1616 MD/MS, 103 Diploma, and 292 DNB (post-MBBS) positions for ophthalmology training.[2] Unfortunately, top AIRs have continued to ignore ophthalmology, as per last available data since NEET-PG 2017, when the exam began. In 2020, not a single examinee under-100 AIR chose ophthalmology, while seven of top-10 AIRs picked general medicine.[1] Similarly, no more than 2 in top-500 AIR and 10 in top-1000 AIR in each year have chosen ophthalmology. This year also saw the least number of candidates in both top-2500 and top-5000 AIRs choosing ophthalmology [Figure 1].
This document presents a literature review and proposal for a study to evaluate the effectiveness of home telemonitoring using an ECG monitor in reducing hospital readmission rates among patients aged 65 and older with heart failure. Heart failure results in many hospitalizations and readmissions that cost the healthcare system billions each year. The literature suggests that telemonitoring allows for early detection of exacerbations and improved management of heart failure symptoms, leading to fewer hospitalizations. The proposed study would compare readmission rates over 4 months for heart failure patients who use home ECG telemonitoring versus the standard telemonitoring system, with the hypothesis that ECG telemonitoring would reduce readmission rates.
This document provides a summary of the 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines on Management of Dyslipidaemia published by the Ministry of Health Malaysia. It outlines the rationale and process for developing the guidelines, which was to review the evidence linking dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease and develop strategies for assessing and managing dyslipidemia using local healthcare resources. An expert panel developed clinical questions and recommendations based on reviews of clinical trials and guidelines from other organizations. The guidelines are intended to guide healthcare providers in Malaysia on best practices for diagnosing and treating dyslipidemia to reduce cardiovascular risk.
The document discusses a VA initiative using telehealth and phone care to reduce readmission rates for congestive heart failure (CHF) patients. Previously, care coordinators were located off-site, hindering collaboration. The new approach uses home telehealth technology to monitor patients after discharge, telephone care for communication, and evidence-based protocols. This led to lower readmission rates within 4 months - 20 patients using telehealth versus 28 with standard care. Statistical analysis found a significant difference between the telehealth and standard care groups in preventing readmissions. The conclusion is that telehealth and phone care can reduce costs by treating CHF patients at home while improving their experience.
Management of pediatric blunt renal trauma a systematic reviewskrentz
This systematic review examines current practices in managing pediatric blunt renal trauma conservatively. 32 studies met the criteria of including cases of high-grade renal injuries in children. The literature supports applying conservative management protocols including observation, percutaneous drainage, stenting, and angioembolization to high-grade pediatric renal trauma, with short and long-term outcomes generally being favorable.
J2016 - Tecson et al AJC Impact of EECP on Heart Failure RehospitalizationEmily Hu
1) The study assessed the impact of enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) combined with heart failure education on reducing 90-day readmission rates in 99 patients with heart failure due to ischemic cardiomyopathy who began EECP within 90 days of hospital discharge.
2) Only 6 patients (6.1%) had unplanned readmissions within 90 days, which was significantly lower than the predicted rate of 34%. Functional status, walk distance, and symptoms also improved after EECP based on various clinical measures.
3) In conclusion, patients who received EECP and education within 90 days of discharge had significantly lower readmission rates than predicted, and also showed improvements in functional status, walk distance, and symptoms.
The challenge of the end of-life discussion housestaff 2014pkhohl
The document discusses end-of-life care for cancer patients in the United States. It finds that about 1/3 of patients with poor prognosis cancer spend their last days in hospitals and intensive care units. About 10% receive aggressive life-sustaining treatments near death. Use of hospice care varies widely between regions and hospitals, with some providing little or no hospice support. Early discussions about end-of-life care can help patients receive less aggressive care near death that aligns with their goals and values, and helps caregivers cope after death. However, patients have difficulty accepting terminal prognoses, and interventions simply providing prognostic information have not impacted care received or understanding on their own. A long-term process
This study evaluated a brief intervention program aimed at reducing frequent visits to emergency departments in Christchurch, New Zealand. 53 participants who frequently visited the emergency department received a 12-week program including assessments of psychological distress and quality of life. The results found that participants significantly reduced their emergency department visits while maintaining their general practice attendance. They also reported decreased psychological distress and increased quality of life. Although the small sample size limits conclusions about the program's efficacy, the results indicate further development of brief intervention models for emergency departments is warranted.
This study investigated the incidence and causes of acute kidney injury (AKI) in children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a hospital in Bangalore, India using the pediatric RIFLE (pRIFLE) criteria. The main findings were:
1) The incidence of AKI was 26.1%, with most cases being stage 'Risk'. AKI was most common in children under 1 year of age.
2) The leading cause of AKI was infections such as dengue, sepsis, and pneumonia.
3) Risk factors for developing AKI included hypotension, use of nephrotoxic drugs, sepsis, and need for mechanical ventilation. The majority (68%)
Este documento presenta los resultados de la Jornada 23 de un campeonato de fútbol masculino. Incluye los marcadores de los 7 partidos jugados, así como la tabla de posiciones que muestra el número de puntos, partidos jugados, ganados, empatados y perdidos de cada equipo. El equipo líder es F.B. Loriguilla con 64 puntos seguido por C.F. Atlético Quelmo-Manises también con 64 puntos.
La Secretaría de Seguridad Pública (SSP) impuso sellos de suspensión temporal a dos empresas de seguridad privada, Sistemas de Alarmas y Radio Comunicaciones de Oaxaca (RADO) y SEG Puertas Automáticas, Alarmas y Cercas Electrificadas, por no cumplir con la ley del Sistema Estatal de Seguridad Pública de Oaxaca. La SSP supervisará de manera constante a las 29 empresas de seguridad privada para garantizar el cumplimiento de la ley y salvaguardar la seguridad de las
Keduanya, COBIT dan ITIL dapat digunakan untuk melakukan audit IT, namun COBIT dianggap lebih baik karena merupakan standar praktik manajemen TI yang dikeluarkan oleh lembaga otoritatif. COBIT memiliki 4 domain cakupan dan menyediakan kerangka governance serta petunjuk kontrol, sedangkan ITIL lebih menekankan pengelolaan siklus hidup layanan TI. Keduanya memiliki asal usul sejak tahun 1980-an
Este documento presenta un plan de marketing digital para la creación de una tienda óptica en línea. Incluye un análisis del mercado óptico y su público objetivo, así como de la competencia. Propone objetivos como aumentar la visibilidad, atraer tráfico y nuevos clientes, y establecer colaboraciones. Detalla pasos como analizar el mercado, establecer objetivos, determinar acciones estratégicas y controlar la inversión. También cubre temas como posicionamiento SEO y SEM, medios de pago, catálogo
This needs assessment examines lack of access to healthcare among low-income and racial/ethnic minority groups in Bergen County, New Jersey. The document finds that these groups face greater barriers to healthcare access due to higher rates of unemployment, lack of health insurance, inability to afford prescriptions, lack of transportation, and cultural/language barriers. Specifically, the assessment found that 19-31% of low-income, Hispanic, and African American residents were unable to fill prescriptions due to cost compared to 19% overall. Additionally, 71-78% of these groups lacked a regular primary care provider compared to 83% overall. The needs assessment concludes more efforts are needed to address barriers like healthcare costs, provider shortages, and
Tucumán se divide en 17 departamentos y limita con Salta, Santiago del Estero y Catamarca. El documento presenta información general sobre la ubicación geográfica de Tucumán entre los paralelos 26o 05' y 28o 01 ́ de latitud sur y los meridianos 64o 28' y 66o 09 ́ de longitud oeste, así como fotos de Tafi del Valle, llamas, una calle principal y arqueología del Mollar.
Children are not things to be moulded, but people to be unfolded. Help needy small children and gather blessings of the Lord. Visit www.havillacc.com to help needy small children in Africa.
1. Chronic disease management involves systematically coordinating clinical care to improve health outcomes for people with chronic diseases across the continuum of care, including treatment and education.
2. Australia has developed its chronic disease management based on the Chronic Care Model and Kaiser Permanente model, with a focus on primary care and prevention.
3. The National Healthcare Agreement between the Commonwealth and states/territories aims to provide all Australians with timely access to quality healthcare based on need rather than ability to pay. It defines objectives, outcomes and performance measures around prevention, primary care, hospitals, aged care and sustainability.
The National Audit of Dementia assessed care for people with dementia in UK hospitals. 210 hospitals participated by submitting organizational checklists and case notes from over 7,000 patients. Key findings included:
- 36% of hospitals had a dementia care pathway fully in place, with around half developing one.
- Executive boards were not regularly reviewing information on dementia patients.
- Assessments of patients' needs improved but were still not fully conducted.
- Antipsychotic prescription decreased but protocols and non-drug approaches need strengthening.
- Liaison psychiatry availability increased but referrals and response times varied.
- Discharge planning and communication with patients and families showed room for improvement.
- Staff training expanded
The document discusses chronic kidney disease (CKD) and different machine learning algorithms that can be used to predict CKD. It first provides background on CKD, defining it as long-term damage to the kidneys that can progressively get worse over time. The document then reviews literature on predicting CKD and discusses methodologies like Naive Bayes, Decision Trees, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Support Vector Machines. It finds that the K-Nearest Neighbor algorithm produced the best results, with 98% accuracy in predicting CKD stages when applied to a dataset.
This document provides guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke. It discusses the importance of public stroke education, prehospital stroke management by EMS, designating stroke centers and improving stroke care quality, emergency evaluation and diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke, and early brain and vascular imaging. The guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations to optimize acute stroke care and treatment.
Reducing Stroke Readmissions in Acute Care Setting.docxdanas19
This document discusses factors that contribute to readmissions of stroke patients and interventions to reduce readmissions. It notes that readmissions account for 20.5% of hospital admissions and reviews reasons for readmissions like medication issues, lack of follow-up care, and unhealthy lifestyles. The document outlines programs like TRACS, COMPASS and MISTT that provide post-discharge support through nurse coaching, medication management support and lifestyle counseling to reduce readmissions.
Integrative Telerehabilitation Strategy after Acute Coronary SyndromeIgnacio Basagoiti
1) The study aims to validate an integrated telerehabilitation model to support post-acute coronary syndrome rehabilitation and secondary prevention using mobile technologies and telemonitoring.
2) Patients will be randomized into two groups - a control group receiving conventional in-hospital rehabilitation and an intervention group using a mobile app and telemonitoring for 10 months of at-home rehabilitation.
3) The primary outcome is adherence to exercise measured by questionnaires and exercise tests, with secondary outcomes of cardiovascular risk factor control, lifestyle changes, and cost analysis.
Rischio Radiologico (Ernesto Mola e Giorgio Visentin)csermeg
1) The document discusses the responsibilities of family doctors in regards to justification and optimization of medical imaging according to the European BSS 2013 guidelines. It describes how family doctors can contribute to ensuring imaging examinations are justified based on clinical need and protocols are optimized to reduce radiation exposure.
2) The document outlines various ways family doctors can help with risk assessment, communication, and management including sharing guidelines, communicating with specialists, collecting patient exposure histories, and involving patients in decision making.
3) WONCA commits to cooperation across stakeholders to promote radiation protection culture through education and establish clear justification processes and clinical imaging guidelines.
The document summarizes recommendations from a 2015 Institute of Medicine report on strategies to improve cardiac arrest survival. It discusses 8 key recommendations, including establishing a national cardiac arrest registry, fostering public awareness and training, enhancing emergency medical services, setting national hospital accreditation standards, adopting quality improvement programs, accelerating research, evaluating therapies, and creating a national collaborative. The American Heart Association response supports the recommendations and provides commitments to help increase cardiac arrest survival.
The document describes how the CDC's Science Impact Framework can be used to measure the impact of scientific work beyond just citation data. It provides three case studies that will illustrate how the framework can be applied. The framework uses a combination of quantitative and qualitative indicators to measure outcomes across five levels of influence: disseminating science, creating awareness, catalyzing action, effecting change, and shaping the future. The case studies will demonstrate how scientific work can have a complex path of impact that does not necessarily follow a linear progression through these levels of influence.
BPS DCP SIGOPAC Good Practice Guidance in Demonstrating Quality and Outcomes ...Alex King
This report outlines a rigorous, multidimensional framework for evaluating quality and outcomes in psycho-oncology services, which can be flexibly adapted to local needs and priorities.
It aims to challenge psycho-oncology services to develop and standardise procedures that address the clinical and operational aspects of quality, while maintaining a firm focus on the experiential.
The proposed framework focuses on six key domains of service quality:
- Is this service safe?
- Is this service equitable, while also focused on those most in need?
- Is this service timely and responsive?
- Is this service respectful, collaborative and patient-centred?
- Is this service offering effective interventions?
- Is this service contributing to efficient multidisciplinary care?
To address these domains, psycho-oncology services need to draw on multiple, convergent sources of data, including key performance indicators, activity levels, patient self-report measures, feedback from professional colleagues, etc.
Supporting medicines adherence developing the pharmacist contributionPM Society
This document summarizes a presentation by Professor Graham Davies on supporting medicine adherence for patients with diabetes. It discusses a project in South London to train community pharmacists to help patients with diabetes better manage their medication. Key challenges discussed include the high rates of non-adherence to medications for long-term conditions and the need for integrated care approaches across health professionals to address patients' multiple conditions and needs.
This document discusses post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), a condition experienced by many survivors of critical illness involving new or worsening impairments in physical, cognitive, or mental health status after leaving the ICU. It provides an overview of PICS, noting that evidence in recent decades has shown PICS to be a significant problem. The document discusses how certain evidence-based ICU interventions like maintaining light sedation levels and early mobilization may help reduce risks for PICS. It promotes upcoming issues of the publication that will provide more information on PICS and the roles of various professionals in addressing it.
Professor Kamlesh Khunti - Introduction to CLAHRC East MidlandsCLAHRC-NDL
Professor Kamlesh Khunti, Director of NIHR CLAHRC East Midlands - Introductory presentation given at CLAHRC East Midlands launch event, 14 February 2014, Loughborough.
2014 Cancer Survivorship Conference at Jefferson University Hospitalsjeffersonhospital
This document summarizes a presentation about cancer survivorship care plans. It discusses the growing number of cancer survivors and challenges they face after treatment. Standards for survivorship care plans have been recommended, including treatment summaries and follow-up care plans covering surveillance, late effects management, and coordination of care. However, few cancer centers provide complete survivorship care plans meeting all recommended elements. Future work is needed to evaluate how survivorship care plans can benefit patients and providers, and to determine optimal ways to implement high-quality survivorship care planning.
The purpose of this briefing is to help you to identify the immediate priority actions to commission effective end of life care.
Publication by the National End of Life Programme which became part of NHS Improving Quality in May 2013
This document provides an introduction to and overview of the 12 recommendations from the Institute of Medicine on promoting global cardiovascular health. It discusses the global cardiovascular disease epidemic and some of the challenges in addressing it, including lack of awareness, competing priorities, and weak health systems. It then groups the 12 recommendations into three categories: building priorities, advocacy and funding; policy and program implementation; and data management, research and global coordination/reporting. For each recommendation, it provides a brief overview of the topic and highlights one or two related articles in the document. The introduction sets the stage for the in-depth discussion of each recommendation that follows in the subsequent articles.
Background: The transition from resident physician to independent practitioner is an important period for young physicians.Optimally, they would feel well prepared to independently care for all patients presenting to them for anesthesia, however, this is unlikely Methods: A survey was emailed to all accredited anesthesiology residency program coordinators in April 2018 for further distribution to their CA3 residents. The survey collected data on the resident’s perception of his or her preparedness to manage a variety of anesthesia cases, patients with comorbid conditions, and ethical issues as well as perform various procedures.
Health policy-and-kidney-care-in-the-united-statesAriana Quito
The document summarizes key policies related to kidney care in the United States, including:
- Medicare is the primary payer for dialysis patients since the inclusion of the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) benefit in 1973.
- Over time, bundled payments have been introduced for dialysis and quality programs adopted for both ESRD and nondialysis chronic kidney disease care.
- Recent initiatives like the Advancing American Kidney Health aim to promote more coordinated kidney care across the spectrum of kidney disease and increase rates of home dialysis and transplantation.
Similar to PSC_spasticity J of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Dx Oct 2013 Philp et al (20)
Health policy-and-kidney-care-in-the-united-states
PSC_spasticity J of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Dx Oct 2013 Philp et al
1. Development of a Poststroke Checklist to Standardize
Follow-up Care for Stroke Survivors
Ian Philp, MD,* Michael Brainin, MD,† Marion F. Walker, PhD,‡
Anthony B. Ward, MD,x Patrick Gillard, PharmD,k Alan L. Shields, PhD,{
and Bo Norrving, MD, PhD,# on behalf of the Global Stroke Community
Advisory Panel**
Background: Long-termcareforstrokesurvivorsisfragmentedandlacksanevidence-
based, easy-to-use tool to identify persistent long-term problems among stroke survi-
vors andstreamline referralfortreatment. We soughtto develop a poststrokechecklist
(PSC) to help health care professionals identify poststroke problems amenable to
treatment and subsequent referral. Methods: An instrument development team, sup-
ported by measurement experts, international stroke experts, and poststroke care
stakeholders, was created to develop a long-term PSC. A list of long-term poststroke
problem areas was generated by an international, multidisciplinary group of stroke
experts, the Global Stroke Community Advisory Panel. Using Delphi methods, a con-
sensus was reached on which problem areas on the list were most important and rel-
evant to include in a PSC. The instrument development team concurrently created
the actual checklist, which provided example language about how to ask about post-
stroke problem areas and linked patient responses to a specific referral process.
Results: Eleven long-term poststroke problem areas were rated highly and consis-
tently among stroke experts participating in the Delphi process (n 5 12): secondary
prevention, activities of daily living, mobility, spasticity, pain, incontinence, commu-
nication, mood, cognition, life after stroke, and relationship with caregiver. These
problem areas were included in the long-term PSC. Conclusions: The PSC was devel-
oped to be a brief and easy-to-use tool, intended to facilitate a standardized approach
for health care providers to identify long-term problems in stroke survivors and to
facilitate appropriate referrals for treatment. Key Words: Stroke—long-term care—
stroke rehabilitation—continuity of patient care—assessment of health care
needs—referral and consultation—quality of life.
Ó 2013 by National Stroke Association
From the *South Warwickshire Foundation National Health Service
Trust, Warwick, United Kingdom; †Department of Clinical Neurosci-
ences and Preventive Medicine, Danube University Krems, Krems,
Austria; ‡Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, University of Not-
tingham, Medical School, Nottingham, United Kingdom; xUniversity
Hospital of North Staffordshire, Haywood Hospital, Stoke on Trent,
United Kingdom; kAllergan Inc, Global Health Outcomes Strategy
and Research, Irvine, California; {Adelphi Values, Patient Reported
Outcomes, Boston, Massachusetts; and #Department of Clinical Sci-
ences, Section of Neurology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Received September 4, 2012; revision received October 24, 2012;
accepted October 31, 2012.
**Panel members: L. Abetz, S. Blackburn, C. Chen, C. Diener, G.
Donnan, P. Duncan, A. Esquenazi, P. Fayad, G. Francisco, D. Good,
G. Graham, B. Kissela, D. Leys, J. Olver, J. Stokes, K. Sunnerhagen,
T. Wein, J. Wissel, and R. Zorowitz.
The discussions relevant to this paper occurred in a series of meet-
ings held in the United States and in Europe, usually in conjunction
with unrelated congress meetings, and were financially supported
by Allergan Inc. The paper was drafted by Dr Philp with the help
of Drs Brainin, Walker, Ward, Gillard, Shields, and Norrving, based
on discussions by the writing group, and was circulated among all
the group members for comment. The authors were not compensated
for their work in the writing of this manuscript, and Allergan Inc did
not influence the manuscript at any stage of its development, includ-
ing the writing and editing of the final version. All listed authors have
approved the final version.
Address correspondence to Ian Philp, MD, South Warwickshire
Foundation National Health Service Trust, Lakin Road, Warwick
CV345BW United Kingdom. E-mail: ian.philp@warwick.ac.uk.
1052-3057/$ - see front matter
Ó 2013 by National Stroke Association
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.10.016
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, Vol. 22, No. 7 (October), 2013: pp e173-e180 e173
2. As the second leading cause of death and one of the
leading contributors to adult disability worldwide, stroke
poses a significant personal, social, and financial global
burden.1,2
Stroke survivors can experience long-term
problems at different points in their recovery, and these
will affect their quality of life for up to 5 years post-
stroke3,4
and possibly longer.5
Stroke survivors may expe-
rience impairments, such as memory loss,6
pain,7
spasticity,8
fatigue,9
urinary incontinence,10,11
cognitive
impairment,12
communication disorders13
, and disability
and activity limitations, such as social isolation,14
emo-
tional change,15
reduced physical functioning (eg, mobil-
ity and performing activities of daily living [ADLs]),16
and impact on the stroke survivor and caregiver relation-
ship.17-20
These long-term problems affect a considerable
percentage of stroke survivors. One review demonstrated
that approximately 33% of stroke survivors did not feel
prepared to manage their problems upon discharge
from acute-stroke treatment and, over the long term, be-
tween 18%-46% experienced social problems and be-
tween 19%-62% experienced emotional problems.3
The
impact of these long-term problems are significant and
contribute to an overall decrease in quality of life among
many stroke survivors.14,21
Compounding the long-term problems stroke survi-
vors experience is the fragmentation of the health care de-
livery system following the acute and subacute phases of
stroke treatment.22
This is unfortunate, as about 50% of
stroke survivors report unmet needs (eg, incontinence,
emotional problems, mobility, pain, and speaking prob-
lems). Patients likely seeing health care providers for
long-term problems also regularly report unmet needs.23
Despite the perceived need for rehabilitation after dis-
charge, many stroke survivors will not receive a rehabili-
tation review or additional therapeutic contact.3
The prevalence of long-term poststroke problems, often
unidentified or untreated although potentially amenable
to effective interventions, and the common fragmentation
of health care systems22
indicate a need for a comprehen-
sive stroke strategy to facilitate long-term management
for stroke survivors. In the United Kingdom, the National
Stroke Strategy recommends that clinical assessments be
carried out 6 and 12 months poststroke and annually
thereafter.24
The Australian stroke guidelines recommend
that stroke survivors have regular and ongoing review by
a member of a stroke team, including at least 1 specialist
medical review, with an initial review within 3 months,
and again at 6 and 12 months postdischarge.25
In the
United States, primary care physicians have 140 quality
care indicators covering general aspects of poststroke
management, although most are not implemented into
clinical practice.26
The World Health Organization has
also called for research into the barriers and opportunities
for providing poststroke management in low- and
middle-income regions in the world.27
Despite these strat-
egies, guidelines, and recommendations, there is a lack of
systems and tools that can enable health care providers to
actively identify opportunities for intervention and man-
age referral to appropriate services. The practice of long-
term care for stroke survivors lacks an evidence-based
and easy-to-use tool that can both identify long-term
problems among stroke survivors and facilitate their re-
ferral from primary/community-based care to appropri-
ate specialist management. The development, adoption,
and implementation of such a tool can help fulfill the
promise of an improved research effort into understand-
ing long-term stroke problems and help meet the long-
term health needs of stroke survivors.
This paper describes the development of the poststroke
checklist (PSC), designed to be an easy-to-use tool to as-
sist health care professionals in identifying treatable post-
stroke problems and facilitate referral for care. The goal in
developing the PSC is to improve the standard of long-
term management provided to stroke survivors, and to
improve their quality of life.
Methods
Consistent with good instrument development prac-
tices,28,29
the PSC was developed with the following
principles in mind: (1) to be simple and easy to use by
health care professionals in primary care settings at 6
and 12 months poststroke and annually thereafter; (2) to
focus on problem areas where evidence-based data sup-
port the effectiveness of interventions to improve out-
comes; and (3) to focus on areas where an intervention
has the largest impact on a stroke survivor’s quality of
life. Consistent with these principles, the PSC was devel-
oped over the course of 4 steps (detailed below) and tai-
lored in preparation for an initial pilot within the
United Kingdom health care system.
Step 1: Specifying Long-Term Poststroke Problems
The first step in developing the PSC was to create an all-
inclusive list of long-term poststroke problems. The ratio-
nale for generating this initial list was to ensure that all
facets of stroke recovery were considered for inclusion
in the final PSC. This list was generated by an interna-
tional and multidisciplinary group of experts, the Global
Stroke Community Advisory Panel (GSCAP), and then
cross-referenced with the International Classification of
Functioning, Disability, and Health.30
GSCAP consists of
21 stroke experts and represents 9 countries: Australia
(n 5 2), Austria (n 5 1), Canada (n 5 1), France (n 5 1),
Germany (n 5 2), Singapore (n 5 1), Sweden (n 5 2),
the United Kingdom (n 5 3), and the United States (n 5
8). The 6 specialty areas represented were stroke neurol-
ogy (n 5 9), neurorehabilitation (n 5 4), physical medi-
cine and rehabilitation (n 5 5), and 1 each from
occupational therapy, physical therapy, and care of the el-
derly.
I. PHILP ET AL.e174
3. Step 2: Constructing a Draft PSC
Once the list of long-term poststroke problems was
specified under the direction of GSCAP (step 1), a set of
instructions, problem areas, and response areas was con-
structed. The goal of this activity was to create a prelimi-
nary instrument. The content of this instrument was
confirmed in step 3, and finalized into the PSC in step 4.
The instrument development team included a subset of
GSCAP experts from the United Kingdom (n 5 3) and
Germany (n 5 1) chosen to represent the larger GSCAP.
Representatives from stakeholder groups involved in
poststroke care in the United Kingdom, including pri-
mary and secondary care physicians, allied health profes-
sionals, community nurses, and representatives of stroke
survivors, were also included in the draft instrument de-
velopment process.
Step 3: Delphi Method to Achieve Expert Consensus on
Poststroke Problem Areas
Similar to previous studies that required expert consen-
sus on stroke treatment issues, a modified Delphi method
was employed.31,32
The Delphi method characterizes a set
of structured communication techniques to facilitate
consensus of opinion among experts on a prespecified
content area through a series of questionnaires
combined with controlled feedback.33
During each round
of activity, information is collected from experts anony-
mously by a Delphi moderator and returned to the panel-
ists for comment. This process continues until
a convergence of opinion is reached, typically after 2
rounds.17,34,35
Here, the Delphi method was used to
achieve consensus among an international group of
stroke experts regarding which long-term poststroke
problems (identified in step 1) have the greatest impact
on a survivor’s quality of life and where evidence-based
interventions exist to address these problems. It is impor-
tant to note that the goal was not to evaluate the draft
checklist (as developed in step 2), but rather to achieve
consensus as to what the instrument should target for as-
sessment. Between November 2010 and January 2011,
there were 2 rounds of controlled communication and
feedback between the expert panelists (n 5 12) and a mod-
erator. An independent health outcomes research organi-
zation (Adelphi Values, Boston, MA) served as the Delphi
moderator, whose role was to facilitate communication
and collect, aggregate, and summarize the data.
Delphi Panel
The Delphi panel consisted of 12 medical experts from 7
countries: Australia (n 5 1), Austria (n 5 1), Germany (n 5
1), Singapore (n 5 1), Sweden (n 5 2), the United Kingdom
(n 5 3), and the United States (n 5 3). Areas of specialty for
the group included stroke neurology, rehabilitation medi-
cine, stroke rehabilitation, physical medicine and rehabil-
itation, and geriatric medicine. On average, the panelists
had been practicing medicine for approximately 29 years
(range 5 16-40) and managing poststroke patients for 25
years (range 5 16-34). Expert panelists did not communi-
cate with each other; to remove potential bias, they com-
municated only with the moderator.
Round 1
Delphi participants were mailed a questionnaire asking
them to consider the list of long-term poststroke problems
developed in step 1 with respect to: (1) those that have the
greatest impact on a survivor’s quality of life, and (2)
those for which evidence-based interventions exist to im-
prove outcomes. The endorsed poststroke problems were
then ranked by panelists based on level of importance (ie,
1 5 most important, 2 5 second most important). Finally,
panelists were asked to list stroke-related problems not
captured by the current list that they considered relevant
for inclusion in a long-term PSC. Panelists mailed com-
pleted questionnaires to the moderator.
Round 2
Delphi participants were mailed a second question-
naire. Similar to round 1, they were asked to rank from
the previously agreed upon list of long-term poststroke
problems that have the greatest impact on a survivor’s
quality of life and for which evidence-based interventions
exist to improve outcomes. Panelists were also provided
a summary of the round 1 results and encouraged to
change their earlier answers if replies from other mem-
bers of the panel compelled them to do so. Panelists
were also given a new set of long-term poststroke prob-
lems to consider (not on the original list, but generated
during round 1) and asked if any were important enough
to add to a PSC (4-point scale of importance: 1 5 not at all,
2 5 slightly, 3 5 moderately, and 4 5 very). Panelists
mailed completed questionnaires to the moderator.
Step 4: Finalizing the PSC
In finalizing the PSC, it was determined a priori that
problems would only be deleted from the draft checklist
if fewer than 25% of the Delphi panelists suggested includ-
ing the problem. The rationale for this cut point was to en-
sure adequate coverage of important problems in the PSC.
If a long-term poststroke problem was added to the list in
round 1, and in round 2 at least 50% of panelists rated the
problem as moderately important or very important, this
problem was considered for inclusion in the PSC.
Results
Step 1: Specifying Long-Term Poststroke Problems
As a first step in developing the PSC, the multidisci-
plinary GSCAP generated a list of poststroke problems
CHECKLIST FOR STANDARD POSTSTROKE CARE e175
4. that could be considered for inclusion in a PSC. This list is
provided in Table 1.
Step 2: Constructing a Draft PSC
Select GSCAP members and representatives from key
stakeholder groups developed a draft PSC. The draft
checklist included a set of instructions and questions
about the long-term poststroke problem areas identified
by GSCAP in step 1 (Table 1). The draft checklist specified
the appropriate referral sequence dependent upon patient
response to questions and the problem areas. Several
draft versions of the checklist were developed to accom-
modate formatting suggestions and improve readability
and usability, cross-checked in terms of content coverage
in step 3, and finalized into the PSC in step 4.
Step 3: Delphi Method to Achieve Expert Consensus on
Poststroke Problem Areas
Round 1
Feedback was received from all of the Delphi panelists
(n 5 12), and results of the panel ratings for poststroke
problem areas are summarized in Table 2. Panelists re-
ported the poststroke problems considered relevant for
a long-term PSC and ranked each area by how important
they considered it to be for stroke survivors. The follow-
ing problems had the highest average ranking across pan-
elists (lower numbers indicate greater relative importance
of the problem area): ADLs (2.0), secondary prevention
(3.2), mobility (4.3), mood (6.3), pain (7.2), communica-
tion/speech (7.4), social participation (7.6), and cognition
(7.9).
Although each panelist had the opportunity to include
stroke-related problems not included in the list they were
asked to consider, few were suggested. Three panelists
(25%) suggested including sexual functioning, and at
least 1 panelist included life after stroke; oral/dental hy-
giene; lifestyle and smoking habits; accessibility for the
disabled; interpersonal relationships with spouse, family,
and friends; psychosocial support; body image/disfig-
urement; and caregiver concerns.
Round 2
Feedback was received from 11 of the Delphi panelists,
and results are summarized in Table 2. Similar to round 1,
the poststroke problem areas given the highest average
importance rankings were (in descending order): ADLs
(1.6), secondary prevention (3.5), mobility (3.6), mood
(5.9), cognition (6.5), communication/speech (6.8), social
participation (7.4), and pain (7.5).
Of the poststroke problem areas not included in the
prespecified list but suggested by panelists during round
1, sexual functioning and caregiver concerns were each
endorsed as relevant (ie, ranked as slightly, moderately,
or very important to include) for inclusion in a PSC by 8
panelists (72.7%) in round 2. Additionally, 7 (63.6%), 6
(54.5%), and 6 (54.5%) panelists endorsed interpersonal
relationships, physical activity, and oral/dental hygiene,
respectively, as relevant poststroke problems. Finally, 4
panelists (36.4%) endorsed including body image/disfig-
urement, and 3 panelists (27.3%) endorsed accessibility
for the disabled as a relevant poststroke problem.
Step 4: Finalizing the PSC
A consensus emerged that the initial list of poststroke
problem areas could be reduced to a core set of 11 for
the final PSC (Fig 1; currently adapted for use in the
United Kingdom). The problem areas of secondary pre-
vention (item 1), ADLs (item 2), and mobility (item 3)
were included in the final PSC, as they were endorsed
as important by virtually all panelists in round 1 and by
all panelists in round 2. Each of these areas was ranked
very high in importance (eg, in the top 5 by at least 70%
of the panelists). Pain (item 5), communication (item 7),
mood (item 8), and social participation (item 10; included
as ‘‘life after stroke’’ in the final PSC) were endorsed as
relevant poststroke problem areas by virtually all panel-
ists in rounds 1 and 2 and, therefore, selected for inclusion
in the final PSC. Spasticity (item 4), continence (item 6; in-
cluded as incontinence in the final PSC), and cognition
(item 9) had a relatively high average importance rating
and were endorsed as relevant poststroke problems by
all but 1 panelist in rounds 1 and 2, so were included in
the final PSC. One additional problem, relationship with
caregiver (item 11), was added to the final PSC due to
50% of Delphi panelists considering it important to add.
Two problem areas identified as important by panelists,
physical activity and sexual function, were not included
in the final PSC due to their conceptual overlap with
problem areas already assessed by the instrument.
Table 1. Preliminary list of poststroke problems
Mobility Mood Financial needs Referral possibilities
Activities of daily living Communication Risk factor assessment Cognition
Spasticity Hearing Rehabilitation needs Stroke recurrence
New pain Getting around Looking after self Social participation
Continence Sleep disturbance Driving Education
Seeing Satisfaction Tissue viability Safety and relationships
Hearing Temperature perception Nutrition/swallowing Mental health
Emotional state Accommodation Epilepsy Staying healthy
I. PHILP ET AL.e176
5. Table 2. Delphi panel ratings for prespecified poststroke problem areas
Poststroke problems
No. of times endorsed
as relevant* Average rankingy
No. of times ranked
in top 5z
No. of times ranked
in bottom 5x Rank rangek
Round 1{ Round 2# Round 1{ Round 2# Round 1{ Round 2# Round. 1{ Round 2# Round 1{ Round 2#
Activities of daily living 12 11 2.0 1.6 12 11 0 0 1-6 1-4
Secondary prevention 11 11 3.2 3.5 10 9 0 0 1-8 1-8
Mobility 12 11 4.3 3.6 10 9 1 1 1-12 1-8
Mood 12 11 6.3 5.9 7 8 2 2 1-14 1-14
Pain 11 11 7.2 7.5 2 2 0 2 1-12 1-12
Communication/speech 12 11 7.4 6.8 4 4 2 3 3-14 3-11
Social participation/empowerment–ability to do
what is important to you
11 11 7.6 7.4 4 3 3 3 3-21 4-13
Cognition 12 10 7.9 6.5 3 4 4 2 2-16 2-13
Spasticity 11 10 9.1 9.2 2 1 2 2 3-16 4-13
Continence 11 10 9.6 10.2 2 1 3 3 2-19 4-19
Swallowing 11 10 10.5 10.7 1 1 4 3 3-17 3-17
Nutrition 8 7 11.0 10.9 0 0 1 1 8-13 8-13
Sleep (disturbance) 7 7 12.1 12.6 0 0 3 2 9-15 9-15
Tissue viability (including skin, sores, pressure
ulcers)
7 7 12.6 14.1 1 1 5 4 2-20 2-22
Epilepsy 6 7 12.8 15.6 0 0 3 3 7-17 10-20
Seeing (change poststroke) 4 5 13.3 13.4 0 0 1 1 11-15 11-16
Education/information–did you receive and do
you need any more?
9 7 13.3 15.9 0 0 6 5 6-18 11-21
Driving 8 6 13.8 15.7 0 0 4 3 6-19 10-19
Hearing (change in poststroke) 1 3 14.0 18.3 0 0 0 2 14 14-22
Concern about current medications (including
side effects)
6 6 14.2 16.8 1 0 3 4 4-21 12-21
Abnormal sensation (eg, abnormal temperature,
pins and needles, not knowing where limbs are)
4 5 15.8 16.8 0 0 2 4 10-20 12-12
Waiting for disability/rehabilitation equipment 5 6 16.6 16.2 1 1 4 4 3-22 3-22
*Delphi panelists considered a set of poststroke problem areas and reported which were relevant to include in poststroke checklist (in this case, relevance was described as those problem areas that
have greatest impact on survivors quality of life and those for which evidence-based interventions exist to improve outcomes).
yDelphi panelists ranked poststroke problem areas in terms of level of importance to them (in this case, 1 indicates area that is most important to you and other problems were ranked in ascending
order). This is average ranking across panelists for each Delphi round.
zNumber of times problem area was ranked among top 5 most important poststroke problem areas to include on poststroke checklist.
xNumber of times problem area was ranked among bottom 5 most important poststroke problem areas to include on poststroke checklist.
kImportance ranking range for each poststroke problem area (eg, activities of daily living was never ranked below sixth and fourth most important poststroke problem area in rounds 1 and 2, re-
spectively).
{Results from round 1 of Delphi method (n 5 12).
#Results from round 2 of Delphi method (n 5 11).
CHECKLISTFORSTANDARDPOSTSTROKECAREe177
6. With the poststroke problem areas selected based on
expert consensus, the PSC was finalized. Based on in-
structions, items, and response options crafted earlier in
the instrument development process (step 2), the instru-
ment development team produced a final PSC that in-
cluded prompts for treatment referral in the United
Kingdom (Fig 1). Referrals are initiated based on the
emergence of new or increasing problems in any of the
noitcAesnopseRnoitseuQ
1. Secondary Prevention
Since your stroke or last assessment, have you seen
anyone regarding advice on changes to lifestyle or
medications for preventing another stroke?
No If No, refer to Primary Care Team for risk factor
assessment and treatment if appropriate
Yes ssergorPevresbO
2. Activities of Daily Living (ADL)
Since your stroke or last assessment, are you finding it
more difficult to take care of yourself?
No Observe Progress
Yes Do you have difficulty dressing, washing
and/or bathing?
Do you have difficulty preparing hot drinks
and/or meals?
Do you have difficulty getting outside?
If Yes to any, refer to the Community
Stroke Team or an appropriate therapist
(ie, OT or PT) for further assessment
3. Mobility
Since your stroke or last assessment, are you finding it
more difficult to walk or move safely from bed to
chair?
No Observe Progress
Yes Are you continuing to receive rehabilitation
therapy?
If No, refer to the Community Stroke Team
for further assessment
If Yes, update patient record and review at
next assessment
4. Spasticity
Since your stroke or last assessment, do you have
increasing stiffness in your arms, hands, and/or legs?
No Observe Progress
Yes
Is this interfering with activities of daily
living?
If No, update patient record and review at
next assessment
If Yes, refer to a physician with an interest
in post-stroke spasticity for further
assessment
5. Pain
Since your stroke or last assessment, do you have any
new pain?
No Observe Progress
Yes If Yes, refer to a physician with an interest in post-
stroke pain for further assessment and diagnosis
6. Incontinence
Since your stroke or last assessment, are you having
more of a problem controlling your bladder or bowels?
No Observe Progress
Yes If Yes, refer to Community Continence Adviser or
equivalent for further assessment
7. Communication
Since your stroke or last assessment, are you finding it
more difficult to communicate with others?
No Observe Progress
Yes If Yes, refer to specialist Speech and Language
Therapist for further assessment
8. Mood
Since your stroke or last assessment, do you feel more
anxious or depressed?
No Observe Progress
Yes If Yes, refer to Primary Care Clinician with an interest
in post-stroke mood changes for further assessment
9. Cognition
Since your stroke or last assessment, are you finding it
more difficult to think, concentrate, or remember
things?
No Observe Progress
Yes Does this interfere with activity or
participation?
If No, update patient record and review at next
assessment
If Yes, refer to a clinician with an interest in
post-stroke cognition changes for further
assessment
10. Life After Stroke
Since your stroke or last assessment, are you finding
things important to you more difficult to carry out (eg,
leisure activities, hobbies, work, relationships with
loved ones)?
No Observe Progress
Yes
If Yes, refer patient to a stroke support organisation
(eg, The Stroke Association)
11. Relationship with Family
Since your stroke or last assessment, has your personal
relationship with your family become more difficult or
stressed?
No Observe Progress
Yes If Yes, schedule next Primary Care visit with patient
and family member. Or if family member is present
refer carer to a stroke support organisation (e.g. The
Stroke Association)
Figure 1. Poststroke checklist: improving life after stroke.
I. PHILP ET AL.e178
7. 11 areas prioritized by the Delphi panelists. For some
problem areas, subsidiary questions were added to sup-
port efficient referral.
Discussion
The PSC assesses 11 long-term problem areas experi-
enced by stroke survivors, provides example language
to ask about the specified poststroke problem area, and
links patient response to a specific referral (eg, primary
care physician, community continence adviser, and
speech language therapist). The 11 long-term poststroke
problem areas assessed by the PSC are secondary preven-
tion, ADLs, mobility, spasticity, pain, incontinence, com-
munication, mood, cognition, life after stroke, and
relationship with caregiver. The PSC was not designed
to cover every possible poststroke problem, but rather tar-
get those areas that have the greatest impact on patient
quality of life and are treatable through evidence-based
interventions. For this reason, an original, more compre-
hensive list of 22 poststroke problem areas, informed by
the literature and generated by an international and mul-
tidisciplinary group of stroke experts (GSCAP), was fil-
tered through a Delphi panel of stroke experts (n 5 12)
to achieve consensus on the shorter list of problem areas
assessed by the PSC.
To date, the majority of stroke research has targeted
acute care, and this has greatly improved short-term
stroke outcomes.36-38
However, a variety of international
efforts have identified the need for a better
understanding of longer-term stroke problems in both re-
search and practice in order to improve long-term care
provided to stroke patients.10,25-27
To better understand
the long-term problems associated with stroke and im-
prove outcomes for stroke survivors, there is a need for
a tool that can both standardize the assessment of these
problems and facilitate referral for appropriate care. The
PSC was developed to fill this gap. Designed with the in-
tention of being brief and an easy-to-use tool, the PSC
may help health providers identify long-term problems
among stroke survivors and facilitate referrals for treat-
ment.
The PSC provides a clear focus for review of long-term
management after stroke that can be readily incorporated
into follow-up systems. The suggested referral prompts
were developed for use in the United Kingdom and
may require modification for different patterns of services
available to people following stroke in other countries.
Work is under way to evaluate use of the checklist in
the United States, Canada, and Singapore with modified
referral prompts. In all countries, the 11 problem areas
are unaltered. Minor textual modifications have been
made to questions 1 and 11 of the PSC to improve patient
understanding based on initial findings from the United
Kingdom and Singapore pilots. The primary aims of the
pilot studies are to evaluate the usefulness of the PSC to
health providers, assess the impact of the PSC on clinic
visits, and determine whether outcomes for stroke survi-
vors are improved. Although the current focus of the PSC
is for use in the primary care setting, it could be used by
specialist stroke practitioners or rehabilitation health pro-
viders, among others. Widespread use of the PSC would
help standardize long-term stroke management, and
health providers and researchers in other regions and
countries are encouraged to test its usefulness and how
its use impacts clinical practice and stroke survivor out-
comes.
There are limitations to the present work. First, the PSC
was developed based on input from clinicians and other
stroke experts, and it may be the case that stroke survi-
vors would have identified different poststroke problem
areas for inclusion. However, the literature, which is
based on patient experiences, describes many of the
same poststroke problem areas targeted by the PSC, and
this includes many of those specified in the International
Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health,
which informed its development. Second, results and
conclusions are dependent on the size and experience of
the Delphi panel. Current methods included 12 panelists,
and it is possible that if the size of the panel were in-
creased, different results would be obtained. This is un-
likely since the consistency in the responses between the
2 rounds suggests broad agreement among the panelists
on the core areas of concern, which is consistent with
those commonly identified in the literature.3,4
Significant long-term problems occur poststroke and
impact patients’ lives for many years.5
Because long-
term problems associated with stroke decrease quality
of life among stroke survivors,14,21
it becomes critical for
health care providers to have tools to both identify
those problem areas and specify a referral plan. The
PSC, as described in this report, was designed as a brief,
easy-to-use, and standardized tool to help health pro-
viders identify long-term problems in their poststroke pa-
tients and to facilitate appropriate referrals for treatment.
Our goal in developing the PSC is to improve the stan-
dard of care for stroke survivors and improve their qual-
ity of life.
References
1. World Health Organization. World health report 2002:
statistical annex 2. Available at: http://www.who.int/
whr/2002/en/whr2002_annex2.pdf. Accessed Novem-
ber 7, 2011.
2. Johnston SC, Mendis S, Mathers CD. Global variation in
stroke burden and mortality: estimates from monitoring,
surveillance, and modeling. Lancet Neurol 2009;
8:345-354.
3. Murray J, Ashworth R, Forster A, Young J. Developing
a primary care–based stroke service: a review of the qual-
itative literature. Br J Gen Pract 2003;53:137-142.
4. Haacke C, Althaus A, Spottke A, Siebert U, Back T,
Dodel R. Long-term outcome after stroke: evaluating
CHECKLIST FOR STANDARD POSTSTROKE CARE e179
8. health-related quality of life using utility measurements.
Stroke 2006;37:193-198.
5. Hare R, Rogers H, Lester H, McManus R, Mant J. What do
stroke patients and their carers want from community
services? Fam Pract 2006;23:131-136.
6. Gamaldo A, Moghekar A, Kilada S, Resnick SM,
Zonderman AB, O’Brien R. Effect of a clinical stroke on
the risk of dementia in a prospective cohort. Neurology
2006;67:1363-1369.
7. Kim JS. Post-stroke pain. Expert Rev Neurother 2009;
9:711-721.
8. Urban PP, Wolf T, Uebele M, et al. Occurrence and clinical
predictors of spasticity after ischemic stroke. Stroke 2010;
41:2016-2020.
9. Glader EL, Stegmayr B, Asplund K. Poststroke fatigue:
a 2-year follow-up study of stroke patients in Sweden.
Stroke 2002;33:1327-1333.
10. National Stroke Association. Lack of adequate post-stroke
care unveiled 2006. Available at: http://www.stroke.
org/site/DocServer/NSA_Stroke_Perceptions_Survey_
Highlights_final.pdf. Accessed August 9, 2011.
11. Wissel J, Olver J, Sunnerhagen KS. Navigating the post-
stroke continuum of care. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis
2013;22:1-8.
12. del Ser T, Barba R, Morin MM, et al. Evolution of cogni-
tive impairment after stroke and risk factors for delayed
progression. Stroke 2005;36:2670-2675.
13. Berthier ML. Poststroke aphasia: epidemiology, patho-
physiology and treatment. Drugs Aging 2005;22:163-182.
14. Lynch EB, Butt Z, Heinemann A, et al. A qualitative study
of quality of life after stroke: the importance of social re-
lationships. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:518-523.
15. Hackett ML, Yapa C, Parag V, Anderson CS. Frequency of
depression after stroke: a systematic review of observa-
tional studies. Stroke 2005;36:1330-1340.
16. Hartman-Maeir A, Soroker N, Ring H, Avni N, Katz N.
Activities, participation and satisfaction one-year post
stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:559-566.
17. Visser-Meily A, Post M, van de Port I, van Heugten C,
van den Bos T. Psychosocial functioning of spouses in
the chronic phase after stroke: improvement or deteriora-
tion between 1 and 3 years after stroke? Patient Educ
Couns 2008;73:153-158.
18. Ilse IB, Feys H, de Wit L, Putman K, de Weerdt W. Stroke
caregivers’ strain: prevalence and determinants in the
first six months after stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2008;
30:523-530.
19. Blake H, Lincoln NB, Clarke DD. Caregiver strain in
spouses of stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 2003;17:312-317.
20. Bugge C, Alexander H, Hagen S. Stroke patients’ infor-
mal caregivers: patient, caregiver, and service factors
that affect caregiver strain. Stroke 1999;30:1517-1523.
21. Teoh V, Sims J, Milgrom J. Psychosocial predictors of
quality of life in a sample of community-dwelling stroke
survivors: a longitudinal study. Top Stroke Rehabil 2009;
16:157-166.
22. Schwamm LH, Pancioli A, Acker JE, et al. Recommenda-
tions for the establishment of stroke systems of care: rec-
ommendations from the American Stroke Association’s
task force on the development of stroke systems. Stroke
2005;36:690-703.
23. McKevitt C, Fudge N, Redfern J, Sheldenkar A,
Crichton S, Wolfe C. UK stroke survivor needs survey.
London: Stroke Association, 2010.
24. Department of Health. National stroke strategy
12-5-2007. Available at: http://www.stroke.org.uk/
document.rm?id51576. Accessed January 28, 2011.
25. National Stroke Foundation. Clinical guidelines for stroke
management 2010. Melbourne (Australia): National Stroke
Foundation, 2010.
26. Summers D, Leonard A, Wentworth D, et al. Comprehen-
sive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary care of the
acuteischemicstrokepatient:ascientificstatementfromthe
American Heart Association. Stroke 2009;40:2911-2944.
27. World Health Organization. Secondary prevention of
noncommunicable diseases in low- and middle-income
countries through community-based and health service
interventions: report of WHO-Wellcome trust meeting
of experts. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001.
28. ClarkL,WatsonD.Constructingvalidity:basicissuesinob-
jective scale development. Available at: http://psycnet.
apa.org/journals/pas/7/3/309/
29. Stone MH. Substantive scale construction. J Appl Meas
2003;4:282-297.
30. World Health Organization. International classification of
functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health
Organization, 2001. ICF.
31. Fisher RJ, Gaynor C, Kerr M, et al. A consensus on stroke:
early supported discharge. Stroke 2011;42:1392-1397.
32. Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and
health services research. BMJ 1995;311:376-380.
33. Dalkey N, Helmer O. An experimental application of the
Delphi method to the use of experts. Manage Sci 1963;
9:458-467.
34. Evans C. The use of consensus methods and expert
panels in pharmacoeconomic studies: practical applica-
tions and methodological shortcomings. Pharmacoeco-
nomics 1997;12:121-129.
35. Evans C, Crawford B. Expert judgment in pharmacoeco-
nomic studies: guidance and future use. Pharmacoeco-
nomics 2000;17:545-553.
36. Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. Organized inpatient
(stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst
Rev 2000;2:CD000197.
37. Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Davalos A, et al. Thrombolysis
with alteplase for acute ischemic stroke in the safe imple-
mentation of thrombolysis in stroke-monitoring study
(SITS-MOST): an observational study. Lancet 2007;
369:275-282.
38. Langhorne P, Taylor G, Murray G, et al. Early supported
discharge services for stroke patients: a meta-analysis of
individual patients’ data. Lancet 2005;365:501-506.
I. PHILP ET AL.e180