Playful design workshop ferrara - uxlx 2014

Playful Design
John Ferrara
An introduction to game experience
design for UX practitioners
While you’re waiting to start
Screenshot a game you’re playing and
tweet it with hashtag #PlayfulDesign

‘Sup
John Ferrara
Creative director, Megazoid Games
User experience designer
“Let’s Move!” award winner
@PlayfulDesign

Today
We’ll talk about games
We’ll play some games
We’ll take a break
We’ll make some games
We’ll test our games

Why should UX designers
care about games?
part 1

Best possible outcome if you...
Skip college.
Never move out of your parents' house.
Never get married.
Never have any children.
Never travel or take any vacations.
Work indefinitely past 65.
Die alone in a nursing home with lots of money and
no one to leave it to.

Baranowski, et. al.
Pediatrics
February 27, 2012

None produced
any difference
in physical activity.

The problem is design.
Games are hard to design well.
Serious games are even harder.

2. Game design is a lot like user experience design
3. Games are a ubiquitous activity
4. Games are innovators in interactivity
5. Technology is bringing games & UX together
Other reasons

Things that games can do
in the real world
part 2

Learning by doing
Practice is rolled in with theory.
Ideas are not just illustrated, but experienced.

Failure based learning
Getting it wrong builds a better understanding.
Games are a totally safe “virtual lab”.

Systems thinking
Working with the relationships between moving parts.
Games are the best medium for this that exists.

Human computation
Useful outputs are a byproduct of play.
“Games are algorithms that run on people.”
-- Luis Von Ahn

Reframing
Casting real-life challenges in a different light.

Overlay
Reframing in-the-moment.
A fantasy world is superposed on reality.

Buy the advantage
Intrinsic rewards for external actions.
Players must greatly value the game experience.

Games are a form of procedural
rhetoric
Procedurality makes games
unique as a communications
medium.

A growing backlash
“I don’t do ‘gamification,’ and I’m not
prepared to stand up and say I think it
works.”
–Jane McGonigal
“Gamification is bullshit.”
–Ian Bogost

Games can achieve
great things in the
real world.*
*If they are well designed experiences.

Elements ofplayer
experience
part 3

Games should
be designed to
be games first.

part 4
Paper prototyping
video games

They’re fast and cheap
They focus on the fundamentals
You can playtest with them
They help people speak in a common language
Why paper prototypes?

Can you really do a video game on paper?

Can you really do a video game on paper?
Stone Librande

Guidelines for paper prototyping
Strip off the aesthetic and usability layers
Work on the underlying gameplay

Guidelines
Don’t be too literal
Work on small things
Make it a real game
Iterate
Strip off the aesthetic and usability layers
Focus on the underlying gameplay

So how might this be done on paper?

Let’s take a closer
look at what’s really
happening.

The objective is to
climb 6 levels without
getting hit by a
barrel.

Sometimes you jump
one barrel (hard).
Sometimes you jump two barrels (harder).

Sometimes there are
barrels above you.
Sometimes they fall down a ladder.

Sometimes you get a
hammer.
Then you get to bust some ass. :-)
But if you ever get hit by a barrell…
You start over at the bottom. :-(

Tower cards
Objective:
Reach level 6
before your
opponent.
Each turn you’ll
have a chance to
move up one level.

Draw a card. Each gives you 3 options.
Move your coin one space up the tower card.

Keep your coin where it is on the tower card.

Move your coin one space down the tower card.

Look out for barrels!
To avoid the barrel, you must roll anything other
than the numbers that appear above it.

Two barrels
If there are two barrels, but must roll separately
for each one. So above, you’d roll twice.

This barrel is in front of the ladder.
You must roll if you want to climb OR exit right.
Barrels in front of the ladder
OK
Roll
Roll

This barrel is behind the ladder.
You only need to roll if you’re exiting right.
Barrels behind the ladder
Roll
OK
OK

Barrels above the ladder
Barrels above can fall down a ladder onto you.
You must roll if you’re climbing the ladder.
Roll
OK
OK

Pop quiz: What could you do here?

The hammer card is awesome
1. Draw again right away.
2. Any barrels on the bottom level are smashed.
3. You still have to roll if a barrel is above.

Discussion
In what ways was this similar to the original game?
In what ways was this different?
What might you change to improve the experience?

Lessons for design
The central conflict of the game
Basic strategy & tactics
What the obstacles are & how often they appear
How hard it should be to jump a barrel
What consequences for mistakes are fair
How the stakes change over time
How the game ends

Abstraction vs. representationalism
Gameplay vs. aesthetics
Luck vs. skill
Going deeper

part 5
A quick primer on essential
game design concepts

Core mechanic
The activities players are engaged in
moment to moment throughout a game.
Roll
Move around the board
Buy properties
Pay rent

Objectives
Specific conditions that players are either trying to...
achieve avoidor

Objectives
Longer games have nested objectives.

Constraints
Limits on what the player can and cannot do.
2 types of constraints:
Environmental
Formal

Environmental constraints
Hard limits set by inherent physical characteristics.

Soft rules that all of the players agree to follow in
order to enable the game experience.
Formal constraints

Conflict
The relationship between objectives and constraints.

Conflict
The relationship between objectives and constraints.
Games necessarily involve challenge.

Ideal experience in game design

Arbitration
Some games have mechanisms that enforce the rules
so people don’t have to.
2 types of arbitration:
Mechanical
Computerized

It’s okay for you to do anything that the game
doesn’t specifically prohibit.
As a result, the design is vulnerable to degenerate
strategies.
Arbitration limits cheating

Degenerate strategy: Is this cheating?

To reach objectives, players may need to make
choices that can have positive or negative outcomes.
Uncertainty is fundamental to risk.
Risk

Greater risks require greater rewards

You usually don’t directly design the play experience.
You design the parameters in which play executes.
The players, objectives, and constraints interact in
complex ways to construct the experience as you go.
Games as systems

30 minutes
Up next: You prototype your own games.
Break time!

A game design game
for 5 players

(each played by
another person)
10 dragon heads
4 warriors
The game ends when
either all dragon
heads or warriors
have been removed
from the board.
(played by 1 person)

If you get anything other than a 1, nothing happens.
The dragon rolls all 4 dice at once

Fang attack
Kill any 1 warrior next
to any dragon head.
(Including diagonals.)

Fire attack
Kill any 1 warrior at
least 3 spaces from
any dragon head.
(Including diagonals.)

Move
All dragon heads
move 1 space in any
direction.
All must move in the
same direction.

Heal
The dragon regrows
1 lost head, which
may be placed in any
space directly up,
down, left, or right
from any other head.
Heads may regrow up
to a maximum of 10.

So how do the warriors work?
That’s up to you!
Make up roles and rules for each warrior
(e.g. elf, fighter, sorceress, etc.)
Write everything down on the character sheets.

Design a system of rules that interact to make a game
experience that’s:
The designer’s objective
Sustained.
Challenging
.
Fair. Enjoyable.

Let’s design!
10 minutes.
Then play begins.
SUSTAINED - CHALLENGING - FAIR - ENJOYABLE

Time to play!
15 minutes.
Make changes as you go.
SUSTAINED - CHALLENGING - FAIR - ENJOYABLE

Discussion
Did anyone develop a character that worked well?
What was the biggest problem in your game?
What might you change to get rid of that problem?

Iteration 2
Start over. Try to improve the experience.
Make new characters with new rules.
You can change the rules for the dragon.
Incorporate at least 2 environmental pieces.

Let’s design
again!
10 minutes.
Then play begins.
USE AT LEAST 2 ENVIRONMENTAL PIECES

Time to play!
10 minutes.
AT LEAST 2 ENVIRONMENTAL PIECES

Was the game better or worse this time?
Were you able to solve the problems?
Did new problems come up?
What’s the most significant problem now?
Discussion

What should
playtesting evaluate?

The “good-tough” problem
Ask yourself
Are players having a hard time for the right reasons?
Do players see the challenge as engaging or discouraging?
Is the challenge appropriate for the current level of the game?
What actions to players take in response to the challenge?
How do players reflect on the challenge after surmounting it?

General playtesting guidelines
Recruit selectively.
Test in a cozy space.
Do an observation script.
If your game is long, run long sessions.
Watch. Listen. Chill.

Iteration 3
Carry forward your favorite characters and rules from
iterations 1 & 2, or create new ones as needed.
Change the rules to promote one of these effects:
Easy: Maximize risk taking among the warriors.
Easy: Maximize the dragon’s aggressiveness.
Medium: Maximize collaboration among the warriors.
Medium: Incentivize the dragon to hold one edge of the board.
Hard: Incentivize the warriors to betray one another.
Hard: Create a way for the dragon to trick the warriors.

Let’s design
again again!
15 minutes.
Then play begins.
ACHIEVE AN EFFECT FROM THE INSTRUCTIONS

TEAM SWAP!!!
10 minutes.
2 players from another team will join your table.
Explain your game and conduct playtesting.

Thank you!
Please complete the assessment form.
Connect with me: @PlayfulDesign

Understand the nutritional attributes of food
Build a knowledge base of food choices
Develop skills to interpret nutrition information
Learn to value healthier food choices
Kids need to:

More than anything,
the problem is cultural.

Challenge to create games that teach
8- to 12- year olds healthier eating habits

Player is responsible for maintaining
the health of a virtual pet
Must shop for the critter's food, cook
for it, and feed it
Each day the player must fill the
critter's green bars without filling the
red bars

1. Define a core message
A persuasive game
must be designed around
a clear and concise statement
of what you want players
to do or to believe.

2. Tie the message to strategy
Games drive players
to find the most efficient ways
to win.
If the message represents
the ideal strategy,
then the process of playing
serves as a proof of its truthfulness.

Tiered system of rewards
Better food choices
Health goes up
Greater productivity, more
sports wins, sick less often
Earn more money
Trick out your pad
Social rewards

3. Enable self-directed discovery
Self-directed discovery persuades
by giving people
a feeling of ownership
of the insight they've uncovered.

Discovering better food choices

Discovering better food sourcing

Discovering healthy recipes
Players can cook, combining
ingredients into prepared
meals.
Meals of greater nutritional merit are worth more
than their constituent ingredients

Meals can be sold to the
restaurant for a profit.
Other players can then
purchase them, enabling
social learning.

4. Offer meaningful choices
If there is no benefit
to making the wrong choice,
then there is
no choice at all.

Effects of high-calorie foods
Advantages:
● More energy for sports games
● More energy for work
Consequences:
● Exceed daily limits faster
● Critter starts rejecting healthier
options

5. Keep it real
Video games' capacity
to simulate the conditions
of the real world
can impart credibility
to embedded arguments.

Fitter Critters has real nutrition
data for 675 actual food items

...and the daily objectives are
based on real consumption
guidelines

Pilot Study, November
2011Northbridge Elementary, MA
Run by University of Massachusetts Medical
School
100 5th graders, 4 class periods
1. Significant increases in positive attitudes
toward nutrition and fitness
2. Significant increases in students' self-
efficacy
3. Moderate increases in nutrition knowledge

Often, you don’t directly design the play experience.
You design the parameters in which play executes.
The players, objectives, and constraints interact in
complex ways to construct the experience as you go.
Games as systems
Although some games aren’t systems, e.g...

There are some big design issues here!!
Games execute outside of the designer’s control.
The real-time interactions between game elements
are complex and hard to predict.
Unintended degenerate strategies can emerge.
Players may not understand a game or they may
struggle with its UI.
Players might not be having any fun.

Playful design workshop ferrara - uxlx 2014

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to Playful design workshop ferrara - uxlx 2014

Similar to Playful design workshop ferrara - uxlx 2014 (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Playful design workshop ferrara - uxlx 2014

Editor's Notes