Assessing the impact of the Digital Economy Act
Brief history of copyright Piracy: rhetoric of filesharing Policy: UK government 2006-present Participation: public responses Politics?
“ Faith in law will not be an effective strategy for high tech companies. Law adapts by continuous increments and at a pace second only to geology in its stateliness. Technology advances in … lunging jerks, like the punctuation of biological evolution grotesquely accelerated. Real world conditions will continue to change at a blinding pace, and the law will get further behind, more profoundly confused. This mismatch is permanent” John Perry Barlow, 1993
Vocal critics of copyright
History of copyright law Statute of Anne 1709 Licensing Act 1662 Statute of Monopolies 1656
History of copyright law Statute of Anne 1709 Exclusive copyright to last 21 years
History of copyright law Copyright Act 1842 Sheet music copyright = life of author + 7 years
History of copyright law Copyright (Musical Compositions) Act 1882  Include public recital or performance of their work
History of copyright law Berne Convention 1886 International protection
History of copyright law Musical Copyright Act  1906 Copyright Act 1911
History of copyright law Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA)
History of copyright law Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA) Extension of copyright in most literary, dramatic, musical or artistic works until 70 years after the death of the creator
History of copyright law Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003 Directive 2001/29/EC (aka European Copyright Directive) Injunctions against ISPs
Implementation RIAA  (Recording Industry Association of America) IFPI  (International Federation of the Phonographic Industry) BPI  (British Phonographic Industry) UK Music FAC  (Featured Artists Coalition)
Copyright law is… … powerful and far-reaching in the rights it grants copyright holders … is confusing and often contradictory when applied across regions …  protects the interests of established rights holders in perpetuity and prevents creative entering the public domain
“ Faith in law will not be an effective strategy for high tech companies. Law adapts by continuous increments and at a pace second only to geology in its stateliness. Technology advances in … lunging jerks, like the punctuation of biological evolution grotesquely accelerated. Real world conditions will continue to change at a blinding pace, and the law will get further behind, more profoundly confused. This mismatch is permanent” John Perry Barlow, 1993
Singles market 1970s until 1999: annual UK singles sales = 70 million Since 1999, this has more than halved. (BPI, 2005: p8) 2008: growth of 33% 115 million + sales (BPI, 2009)
UK music market 1997-2009 (millions) Data supplied by The Official Charts Company (BPI Press Release: 7 th  Jan 2009)
UK music market 1997-2009 (millions)
UK music industry is growing Revenues up by 4.7% Growth in secondary markets
7 million filesharers? Sources:  UK National Statistics ;  SABIP
Policy: Gowers Review Chapter 2 cited BPI figures claiming that the music industry had lost £414 million in lost sales (2005) £278 million (2003) Uptake in broadband internet
Policy: Gowers Review Chapter 5 – Recommendation 39 Encourage co-operation between rights holders and ISPs
Policy: Digital Britain (Interim) ‘ a fundamental change in consumer expectations, particularly among the young’ (2009: p41)  BPI: £180 million IFPI: £1.1 billion by 2012
Policy: Digital Britain  Chapter 4: Actions 12 and 13 covered the possibilities of rights holders and ISPs  ‘funding a new approach to civil enforcement of copyright’ 70% reduction in filesharing
Policy: public consultation France: HADOPI 3 strikes and disconnection Accusation vs conviction Secretary of State power of secondary legislation Over 220 responses – no consensus
Ofcom powers regarding media regulation Filesharing Channel 4 ’s remit Commercial TV licences Regional TV news Radio spectrum Video games Intellectual property
3 readings in the House of Lords Lord Puttnam:  the Bill was being rushed through without sufficient scrutiny and that legislators were subject to an  ‘ extraordinary degree of lobbying ’ from copyright holders
Clauses 17 and 18 3 strikes Web blocking powers Written by the industry
"a bill of this size would probably have a one-day second reading debate and then  about 60 to 80 hours  in committee, where it would be  scrutinised line by line, clause by clause ". However, under the current accelerated schedule, "it will receive one day for second reading and  at the very most, two hours in a committee  of the whole house. The government will programme the debate so huge chunks of the bill might not receive any scrutiny at all... ” cited by  Doctorow, 2010
“ A participatory culture is a culture with relatively  low barriers to artistic expression and civic engagement ,  strong support for creating and sharing one’s creations , and some type of informal mentorship whereby what is known by the most experienced is passed along to novices. A participatory culture is also one in which members believe their contributions matter, and feel some degree of social connection with one another” Jenkins, 2006
Summary ISPs won a judicial review against the Act Filesharing is not decreasing Government has granted more punitive powers
‘ Instead of exploring P2P exchange as a business opportunity, they defined it as a piratical threat.  In doing so, they inadvertently implied that they had the right to determine how people apply after-sales use of intellectual property by re-asserting commercial copyright in a set of relations that were effectively deregulated.’ (Rojek, 2005: 359)
“ Faith in law will not be an effective strategy for high tech companies. Law adapts by continuous increments and at a pace second only to geology in its stateliness. Technology advances in … lunging jerks, like the punctuation of biological evolution grotesquely accelerated. Real world conditions will continue to change at a blinding pace, and the law will get further behind, more profoundly confused. This mismatch is permanent” John Perry Barlow, 1993
S1, ToobyDoo, 2008,  “Piracy”,  http://www.flickr.com/photos/toobydoo/2476286356/ S8-10, Liako, 2009, “Piracy: it’s a crime”,  http://www.flickr.com/photos/liako/3558668316/ S12, Dr Stephen Dann, 2006, “piracyisacrime 29—09-2005 9-51-37 PM”,  http://www.flickr.com/photos/stephendann/80725933/   S13-15, c3o, 2006, “Anti piracy ads”,  http://www.flickr.com/photos/c3o/244072083/   S16, 40, Selma90, 2009, “Apple”,  http://www.flickr.com/photos/selma90/3675162262/   S41, Jamougha, 2009, “DVD Magic”,  P47, Selma90, 2009, “Apple”  http://www.flickr.com/photos/selma90/3675162262/   S43-44, scribbletaylor, 2009, “20 th  April: Technology and gadgets”,  http://www.flickr.com/photos/64958688@N00/3463716076/   S48, A. Diez Herrero, 2007, “creative commons -Franz Patzig-”,  http://www.flickr.com/photos/21572939@N03/2090542246/
Image sources P1,2, 5, Automania, 2005,  “Christmas Music”,  http://www.flickr.com/photos/automania/74037479/ P6, hc gilje, 2007, “EMI Electola”,  http://www.flickr.com/photos/hcgilje/501769056/   P7, 8, aus_chick, 2006, “EMI”,  http://www.flickr.com/photos/hcgilje/501769056/   P10, 25, 34, myuibe, 2008, “copyright and digital culture”,  http://www.flickr.com/photos/myuibe/2132305949/   P11, 12, 16, 17, _ambrown, 2006, “Music Millenium, Portland Oregon”,  http://www.flickr.com/photos/dietpoison/195288442/   P18, p_kirn, 2007, “Handmade Music 8/23/07 with Etsy Labs, CDM, and Make”,  http://www.flickr.com/photos/p_kirn/1218971167/   P31-3, karola riegler photography, 2009, “Vinyl kills the mp3 industry”,  http://www.flickr.com/photos/karola/3639759076/   P35, 37, Ferrari + caballos + fuerza = cerebro Humano, 2009, “Musica comprimida – Compressed Music”,  http://www.flickr.com/photos/gallery-art/3497849677/   P38, GabryPk, 2008, “Music Is My Drug pt. 2”,  http://www.flickr.com/photos/gabrypk/3107000631/   P47, Selma90, 2009, “Apple”  http://www.flickr.com/photos/selma90/3675162262/

Piracy, Policy, Participation

  • 1.
    Assessing the impactof the Digital Economy Act
  • 2.
    Brief history ofcopyright Piracy: rhetoric of filesharing Policy: UK government 2006-present Participation: public responses Politics?
  • 3.
    “ Faith inlaw will not be an effective strategy for high tech companies. Law adapts by continuous increments and at a pace second only to geology in its stateliness. Technology advances in … lunging jerks, like the punctuation of biological evolution grotesquely accelerated. Real world conditions will continue to change at a blinding pace, and the law will get further behind, more profoundly confused. This mismatch is permanent” John Perry Barlow, 1993
  • 4.
  • 5.
    History of copyrightlaw Statute of Anne 1709 Licensing Act 1662 Statute of Monopolies 1656
  • 6.
    History of copyrightlaw Statute of Anne 1709 Exclusive copyright to last 21 years
  • 7.
    History of copyrightlaw Copyright Act 1842 Sheet music copyright = life of author + 7 years
  • 8.
    History of copyrightlaw Copyright (Musical Compositions) Act 1882 Include public recital or performance of their work
  • 9.
    History of copyrightlaw Berne Convention 1886 International protection
  • 10.
    History of copyrightlaw Musical Copyright Act 1906 Copyright Act 1911
  • 11.
    History of copyrightlaw Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA)
  • 12.
    History of copyrightlaw Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA) Extension of copyright in most literary, dramatic, musical or artistic works until 70 years after the death of the creator
  • 13.
    History of copyrightlaw Copyright and Related Rights Regulations 2003 Directive 2001/29/EC (aka European Copyright Directive) Injunctions against ISPs
  • 14.
    Implementation RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) IFPI (International Federation of the Phonographic Industry) BPI (British Phonographic Industry) UK Music FAC (Featured Artists Coalition)
  • 19.
    Copyright law is…… powerful and far-reaching in the rights it grants copyright holders … is confusing and often contradictory when applied across regions … protects the interests of established rights holders in perpetuity and prevents creative entering the public domain
  • 20.
    “ Faith inlaw will not be an effective strategy for high tech companies. Law adapts by continuous increments and at a pace second only to geology in its stateliness. Technology advances in … lunging jerks, like the punctuation of biological evolution grotesquely accelerated. Real world conditions will continue to change at a blinding pace, and the law will get further behind, more profoundly confused. This mismatch is permanent” John Perry Barlow, 1993
  • 22.
    Singles market 1970suntil 1999: annual UK singles sales = 70 million Since 1999, this has more than halved. (BPI, 2005: p8) 2008: growth of 33% 115 million + sales (BPI, 2009)
  • 23.
    UK music market1997-2009 (millions) Data supplied by The Official Charts Company (BPI Press Release: 7 th Jan 2009)
  • 24.
    UK music market1997-2009 (millions)
  • 25.
    UK music industryis growing Revenues up by 4.7% Growth in secondary markets
  • 27.
    7 million filesharers?Sources: UK National Statistics ; SABIP
  • 29.
    Policy: Gowers ReviewChapter 2 cited BPI figures claiming that the music industry had lost £414 million in lost sales (2005) £278 million (2003) Uptake in broadband internet
  • 30.
    Policy: Gowers ReviewChapter 5 – Recommendation 39 Encourage co-operation between rights holders and ISPs
  • 31.
    Policy: Digital Britain(Interim) ‘ a fundamental change in consumer expectations, particularly among the young’ (2009: p41) BPI: £180 million IFPI: £1.1 billion by 2012
  • 32.
    Policy: Digital Britain Chapter 4: Actions 12 and 13 covered the possibilities of rights holders and ISPs ‘funding a new approach to civil enforcement of copyright’ 70% reduction in filesharing
  • 33.
    Policy: public consultationFrance: HADOPI 3 strikes and disconnection Accusation vs conviction Secretary of State power of secondary legislation Over 220 responses – no consensus
  • 34.
    Ofcom powers regardingmedia regulation Filesharing Channel 4 ’s remit Commercial TV licences Regional TV news Radio spectrum Video games Intellectual property
  • 35.
    3 readings inthe House of Lords Lord Puttnam: the Bill was being rushed through without sufficient scrutiny and that legislators were subject to an ‘ extraordinary degree of lobbying ’ from copyright holders
  • 36.
    Clauses 17 and18 3 strikes Web blocking powers Written by the industry
  • 37.
    "a bill ofthis size would probably have a one-day second reading debate and then about 60 to 80 hours in committee, where it would be scrutinised line by line, clause by clause ". However, under the current accelerated schedule, "it will receive one day for second reading and at the very most, two hours in a committee of the whole house. The government will programme the debate so huge chunks of the bill might not receive any scrutiny at all... ” cited by Doctorow, 2010
  • 39.
    “ A participatoryculture is a culture with relatively low barriers to artistic expression and civic engagement , strong support for creating and sharing one’s creations , and some type of informal mentorship whereby what is known by the most experienced is passed along to novices. A participatory culture is also one in which members believe their contributions matter, and feel some degree of social connection with one another” Jenkins, 2006
  • 48.
    Summary ISPs wona judicial review against the Act Filesharing is not decreasing Government has granted more punitive powers
  • 49.
    ‘ Instead ofexploring P2P exchange as a business opportunity, they defined it as a piratical threat. In doing so, they inadvertently implied that they had the right to determine how people apply after-sales use of intellectual property by re-asserting commercial copyright in a set of relations that were effectively deregulated.’ (Rojek, 2005: 359)
  • 50.
    “ Faith inlaw will not be an effective strategy for high tech companies. Law adapts by continuous increments and at a pace second only to geology in its stateliness. Technology advances in … lunging jerks, like the punctuation of biological evolution grotesquely accelerated. Real world conditions will continue to change at a blinding pace, and the law will get further behind, more profoundly confused. This mismatch is permanent” John Perry Barlow, 1993
  • 51.
    S1, ToobyDoo, 2008, “Piracy”, http://www.flickr.com/photos/toobydoo/2476286356/ S8-10, Liako, 2009, “Piracy: it’s a crime”, http://www.flickr.com/photos/liako/3558668316/ S12, Dr Stephen Dann, 2006, “piracyisacrime 29—09-2005 9-51-37 PM”, http://www.flickr.com/photos/stephendann/80725933/ S13-15, c3o, 2006, “Anti piracy ads”, http://www.flickr.com/photos/c3o/244072083/ S16, 40, Selma90, 2009, “Apple”, http://www.flickr.com/photos/selma90/3675162262/ S41, Jamougha, 2009, “DVD Magic”, P47, Selma90, 2009, “Apple” http://www.flickr.com/photos/selma90/3675162262/ S43-44, scribbletaylor, 2009, “20 th April: Technology and gadgets”, http://www.flickr.com/photos/64958688@N00/3463716076/ S48, A. Diez Herrero, 2007, “creative commons -Franz Patzig-”, http://www.flickr.com/photos/21572939@N03/2090542246/
  • 52.
    Image sources P1,2,5, Automania, 2005, “Christmas Music”, http://www.flickr.com/photos/automania/74037479/ P6, hc gilje, 2007, “EMI Electola”, http://www.flickr.com/photos/hcgilje/501769056/ P7, 8, aus_chick, 2006, “EMI”, http://www.flickr.com/photos/hcgilje/501769056/ P10, 25, 34, myuibe, 2008, “copyright and digital culture”, http://www.flickr.com/photos/myuibe/2132305949/ P11, 12, 16, 17, _ambrown, 2006, “Music Millenium, Portland Oregon”, http://www.flickr.com/photos/dietpoison/195288442/ P18, p_kirn, 2007, “Handmade Music 8/23/07 with Etsy Labs, CDM, and Make”, http://www.flickr.com/photos/p_kirn/1218971167/ P31-3, karola riegler photography, 2009, “Vinyl kills the mp3 industry”, http://www.flickr.com/photos/karola/3639759076/ P35, 37, Ferrari + caballos + fuerza = cerebro Humano, 2009, “Musica comprimida – Compressed Music”, http://www.flickr.com/photos/gallery-art/3497849677/ P38, GabryPk, 2008, “Music Is My Drug pt. 2”, http://www.flickr.com/photos/gabrypk/3107000631/ P47, Selma90, 2009, “Apple” http://www.flickr.com/photos/selma90/3675162262/