This document contains explanations for why certain photos were not used in a magazine. The photos were not selected due to issues like poor quality, subjects cut off or out of frame, lack of focus on the subject, and other photos being deemed more impressive and useful. Reasons provided include blurriness, subjects not looking at the camera or appearing to be performing, and photos not fitting the intended articles or features.

1. Photos I didn’t use

2. I didn’t use this photo as the quality isn’t
amazing so it doesn’t look professional
enough to be in a magazine. Also, out of
the 5 members of the band, we can only
see 3, and only one of them is actually
looking at the camera
I didn’t use this photo for the ‘Jessica
Meets’ feature because quite obviously, the
top of the band member has been cut off.
Another reason I didn’t use it is because
the photo is really close to the camera, and
it doesn’t make sense with the feature of
the magazine because they would usually
have someone take it for them, rather than
taking it themselves

3. I didn’t use this as a poster because, first
of all, it’s too zoomed in so we can only
see a small part of the band member. I
also didn’t use it because he is not
looking at the camera and doesn’t know
this picture is being taken.
I didn’t use this in my Katy Perry
article because the picture is quite
blurred and can’t really make out
that it’s her. Also the article is
describing how amazing Katy
Perry’s concert was, but on the
picture she doesn’t look like she’s
performing much.

4. I didn’t use this photo for m
Panic! At The Disco title
because again the picture is
fairly blurred but also, I feel
that I got more impressive
and useful photos for my
magazine compared to this
one.