Sonja Campbell works as a Secretary Sr. Executive in the Clinical Pharmacology-DOM department at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. This performance evaluation covers the period from May 3, 2013 to April 30, 2014. According to the evaluation, Ms. Campbell meets or exceeds expectations in all areas of her job functions and Credo values. Her supervisor notes that she maintains a professional work environment and defines the importance of performing duties to a high standard. The evaluation rates her overall performance as 4.9 out of 5.
This document contains materials for evaluating the job performance of a dentist hygienist, including:
- A multi-page performance appraisal form for rating a hygienist's performance, strengths/accomplishments, areas for improvement, and signatures.
- Links to additional online resources for performance appraisals, including sample forms, methods, and key performance indicators (KPIs).
- Sample phrases for evaluating a hygienist's attitude, creativity, decision-making, and other skills in a performance review.
T-1.8.1Details of AssessmentTerm and YearTerm 2 2015Time a.docxmattinsonjanel
T-1.8.1
Details of Assessment
Term and Year
Term 2 2015
Time allowed
-
Assessment No
1 of 1
Assessment Weighting
100%
Assessment Type
Written Response
Due Date
Week No. 8
Room
Details of Subject
Qualification
ICT20115 - Certificate II in Information, Digital Media and Technology
Subject Name
IT in a Sustainable Environment
Details of Unit(s) of competency
Unit Code (s) and Names
BSBWHS201 - Contribute to health and safety of self and others
BSBSUS201 - Participate in environmentally sustainable work practices
ICTICT202 - Work and communicate effectively in an ICT environment
Details of Student
Student Name
College
Student ID
Student Declaration: I declare that the work submitted is my own, and has not been copied or plagiarised from any person or source.
Signature: ___________________________
Date: _______/________/_______________
Details of Assessor
Assessor’s Name
Assessment Outcome
Results
|_| Competent |_| Not Yet Competent
Marks
/100
FEEDBACK TO STUDENT
Progressive feedback to students, identifying gaps in competency and comments on positive improvements:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Student Declaration: I declare that I have been assessed in this unit, and I have been advised of my result. I am also aware of my right to appeal and the reassessment procedure.
Signature: ____________________________
Date: ____/_____/_____
Assessor Declaration: I declare that I have conducted a fair, valid, reliable and flexible assessment with this student, and I have provided appropriate feedback
|_| Student did not attend the feedback session.
Feedback provided on assessment.
Signature: ____________________________
Date: ____/_____/_____
Purpose of the assessment
The purpose of this assessment is to assess the student in the following outcomes:
Competent
(C)
Not yet Competent
(NYC)
Performance Criteria :BSBWHS201 Contribute to health and safety of self and others
1.1 Follow provided safety procedures and instructions when working
1.2 Carry out pre start systems and equipment checks according to workplace procedures
1.3 Follow workplace procedures for responding to emergency incidents
2.1 Identify designated persons to whom queries and concerns about safety in the workplace should be directed
2.2 Identify existing and potential hazards in the workplace, report them to designated persons and record them according to workplace procedures
2.3 Identify and implement WHS procedures and work instructions
2.4 Identify and report emergency incidents and injuries to designated persons according to workplace procedures
2.5 Identify WHS duty holders and their duties for own ...
This document provides guidance for assessors on conducting competency-based assessments for the unit Prepare and produce cakes and pastries. It includes an introduction to competency-based assessment, the competency standard, suggested assessment methods, instructions for assessors, assessment templates and a competency recording sheet. Assessors are to use this material to assess candidates' skills and knowledge in a consistent and rigorous manner.
This document outlines the syllabus for an economics course on development planning and project evaluation. The course will introduce tools for analyzing the financial and economic impacts of development projects. It will cover principles of cost-benefit analysis, identification and valuation of costs and benefits, and decision criteria for project evaluation. Students will be evaluated based on class participation, an assignment, two midterm exams, and a final exam. The course readings will include a textbook on economic analysis of investment operations as well as other sources on cost-benefit analysis and development planning.
Hrm orientation and training by dessler garryTephkiantWun
This power point presentation covers topics related to human resource management orientation and training. It discusses what orientation and training are, their purposes, who is responsible for conducting them, and different methods for presenting orientation and assessing training needs. Some key points covered include defining orientation as introducing new employees to company policies and culture, the purposes of orientation being to help employees adjust and understand expectations, and different levels of orientation including organizational and departmental. Training methods discussed include on-the-job training, apprenticeships, lectures, and computer-based learning. The presentation also addresses evaluating the effectiveness of training programs.
This document provides guidelines for food safety specialists and consultants on coaching client food safety teams. It outlines a three-phase approach for coaching teams: assessment of current conditions, implementation of improvements, and maintenance of the implemented system. The guidelines cover prerequisite programs and food safety management systems, with details on requirements and documentation. Specialists are to use the guidelines as a framework but tailor their approach to each client's needs and situation.
This document contains materials for evaluating the job performance of a dentist hygienist, including:
- A multi-page performance appraisal form for rating a hygienist's performance, strengths/accomplishments, areas for improvement, and signatures.
- Links to additional online resources for performance appraisals, including sample forms, methods, and key performance indicators (KPIs).
- Sample phrases for evaluating a hygienist's attitude, creativity, decision-making, and other skills in a performance review.
T-1.8.1Details of AssessmentTerm and YearTerm 2 2015Time a.docxmattinsonjanel
T-1.8.1
Details of Assessment
Term and Year
Term 2 2015
Time allowed
-
Assessment No
1 of 1
Assessment Weighting
100%
Assessment Type
Written Response
Due Date
Week No. 8
Room
Details of Subject
Qualification
ICT20115 - Certificate II in Information, Digital Media and Technology
Subject Name
IT in a Sustainable Environment
Details of Unit(s) of competency
Unit Code (s) and Names
BSBWHS201 - Contribute to health and safety of self and others
BSBSUS201 - Participate in environmentally sustainable work practices
ICTICT202 - Work and communicate effectively in an ICT environment
Details of Student
Student Name
College
Student ID
Student Declaration: I declare that the work submitted is my own, and has not been copied or plagiarised from any person or source.
Signature: ___________________________
Date: _______/________/_______________
Details of Assessor
Assessor’s Name
Assessment Outcome
Results
|_| Competent |_| Not Yet Competent
Marks
/100
FEEDBACK TO STUDENT
Progressive feedback to students, identifying gaps in competency and comments on positive improvements:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Student Declaration: I declare that I have been assessed in this unit, and I have been advised of my result. I am also aware of my right to appeal and the reassessment procedure.
Signature: ____________________________
Date: ____/_____/_____
Assessor Declaration: I declare that I have conducted a fair, valid, reliable and flexible assessment with this student, and I have provided appropriate feedback
|_| Student did not attend the feedback session.
Feedback provided on assessment.
Signature: ____________________________
Date: ____/_____/_____
Purpose of the assessment
The purpose of this assessment is to assess the student in the following outcomes:
Competent
(C)
Not yet Competent
(NYC)
Performance Criteria :BSBWHS201 Contribute to health and safety of self and others
1.1 Follow provided safety procedures and instructions when working
1.2 Carry out pre start systems and equipment checks according to workplace procedures
1.3 Follow workplace procedures for responding to emergency incidents
2.1 Identify designated persons to whom queries and concerns about safety in the workplace should be directed
2.2 Identify existing and potential hazards in the workplace, report them to designated persons and record them according to workplace procedures
2.3 Identify and implement WHS procedures and work instructions
2.4 Identify and report emergency incidents and injuries to designated persons according to workplace procedures
2.5 Identify WHS duty holders and their duties for own ...
This document provides guidance for assessors on conducting competency-based assessments for the unit Prepare and produce cakes and pastries. It includes an introduction to competency-based assessment, the competency standard, suggested assessment methods, instructions for assessors, assessment templates and a competency recording sheet. Assessors are to use this material to assess candidates' skills and knowledge in a consistent and rigorous manner.
This document outlines the syllabus for an economics course on development planning and project evaluation. The course will introduce tools for analyzing the financial and economic impacts of development projects. It will cover principles of cost-benefit analysis, identification and valuation of costs and benefits, and decision criteria for project evaluation. Students will be evaluated based on class participation, an assignment, two midterm exams, and a final exam. The course readings will include a textbook on economic analysis of investment operations as well as other sources on cost-benefit analysis and development planning.
Hrm orientation and training by dessler garryTephkiantWun
This power point presentation covers topics related to human resource management orientation and training. It discusses what orientation and training are, their purposes, who is responsible for conducting them, and different methods for presenting orientation and assessing training needs. Some key points covered include defining orientation as introducing new employees to company policies and culture, the purposes of orientation being to help employees adjust and understand expectations, and different levels of orientation including organizational and departmental. Training methods discussed include on-the-job training, apprenticeships, lectures, and computer-based learning. The presentation also addresses evaluating the effectiveness of training programs.
This document provides guidelines for food safety specialists and consultants on coaching client food safety teams. It outlines a three-phase approach for coaching teams: assessment of current conditions, implementation of improvements, and maintenance of the implemented system. The guidelines cover prerequisite programs and food safety management systems, with details on requirements and documentation. Specialists are to use the guidelines as a framework but tailor their approach to each client's needs and situation.
192020 Capella University Scoring Guide Toolhttpsscor.docxaulasnilda
1/9/2020 Capella University Scoring Guide Tool
https://scoringguide.capella.edu/grading-web/gradingdetails 1/7
MHA-FP5064
u03a1 - Health Information System Implementation
Learner: Monna , Joseph
OVERALL COMMENTS
Mona
This paper is not very clear and specific. You have very genialized explanations of data and are not discussing
data requirements from meaningful use and merit-based incentives. Also you are not supporting the data needs
with CURRENT academic sources. You only have 2 references both from well over 10 years ago. You need
research current trends and best practices from recent sources.
See the rubric below for more specifics.
RUBRICS
1/9/2020 Capella University Scoring Guide Tool
https://scoringguide.capella.edu/grading-web/gradingdetails 2/7
CRITERIA 1
Outline a plan for collecting and analyzing data.
COMPETENCY
Incorporate project management principles into health care administration management and leadership.
NON_PERFORMANCE: Does not outline a plan for collecting and analyzing data.
BASIC:
Outlines a plan for collecting and analyzing data that is impracticable or unlikely to yield limited data for
analysis.
PROFICIENT: Outlines a plan for collecting and analyzing data.
DISTINGUISHED:
Outlines a plan for collecting and analyzing data. Provides a concise and well-articulated outline that
identifies specific data needs and a clear approach to analysis.
Comments:
I am not see a plan that alignes with current trends in health care. Plan needs to address specific data that
would common in an EHR and meet current legislative requirments.
(20%)
1/9/2020 Capella University Scoring Guide Tool
https://scoringguide.capella.edu/grading-web/gradingdetails 3/7
CRITERIA 2
Propose criteria for evaluating organizational needs.
COMPETENCY
Incorporate project management principles into health care administration management and leadership.
NON_PERFORMANCE: Does not propose criteria for evaluating organizational needs.
BASIC:
Proposes criteria for evaluating organizational needs that may lead to erroneous conclusions.
PROFICIENT: Proposes criteria for evaluating organizational needs.
DISTINGUISHED:
Proposes criteria for evaluating organizational needs, and provides relevant, credible evidence that
clearly validates the proposed criteria.
Comments:
Very unclear and is not alinging with best practices from AHIMA, HIMSS or Health IT,gov. Research
current oversight organizations
(16%)
1/9/2020 Capella University Scoring Guide Tool
https://scoringguide.capella.edu/grading-web/gradingdetails 4/7
CRITERIA 3
Outline a plan for generating reports.
COMPETENCY
Incorporate project management principles into health care administration management and leadership.
NON_PERFORMANCE: Does not outline a plan for generating reports.
BASIC:
Outlines a plan for generating reports that is impracticable or unlikely to provide all of the information
necessary to support sound decision making.
PROFICIENT: Outlines a ...
Here are the key next steps after validating your pre-assessment tool:
1. Document the validation process and outcomes. Record how the tool was tested, what was evaluated, any issues identified, and actions taken.
2. Make any necessary changes or improvements to the tool based on the validation results. Modify the tool, assessment methods, guidelines, or training as needed.
3. Implement the validated tool for pre-assessing learners. Use the tool consistently as part of the enrolment process to identify learner support requirements.
4. Review learner pre-assessment results on an ongoing basis. Monitor outcomes for continual improvement opportunities. Look for inconsistencies or gaps to address through future validation.
5. Re
Here are the key next steps after validating your pre-assessment tool:
1. Document the validation process and outcomes. Record how the tool was tested, what was evaluated, any issues identified, and actions taken.
2. Make any necessary changes or improvements to the tool based on the validation results. Modify the tool, assessment methods, guidelines, or training as needed.
3. Implement the validated tool for pre-assessing learners. Use the tool consistently as part of the enrolment process to identify learner support requirements.
4. Review learner pre-assessment results on an ongoing basis. Monitor outcomes for continual improvement opportunities. Look for inconsistencies or gaps to address through future validation.
5. Re
Table of Contents Table of Contents1Assessmenpearlenehodge
Table of Contents
Table of Contents1
Assessment instructions3
Assessment requirements6
Candidate Details7
Assessment – BSBFIN501 - Manage budgets and financial plans7
Activity8
Activity 1A8
Activity 1B9
Activity 1C10
Activity 1A-1C Checklist11
Activity 2A12
Activity 2B13
Activity 2C14
Activity 2D15
Activity 2A-2D Checklist16
Activity 3A18
Activity 3B19
Activity 3C20
Activity 3D21
Activity 3A-3D Checklist22
Knowledge Activity (Q & A)23
Section B: Knowledge Activity (Q&A) Checklist24
Performance Activity25
Performance Activity Checklist29
Competency record to be completed by the assessor31
Case Study A – Communicate details of agreed budget and financial plans to relevant team members32
Case Study B33
Case Study C – Providing support34
Case Study D35
Case Study E36
Case Study F37
Appendix 138
Appendix 239
Appendix 341
Appendix 4- Cash flow Projections for 2021 and 202242
Instructions to Learner
Assessment instructions
Overview
Prior to commencing the assessments, your trainer/assessor will explain each assessment task and the terms and conditions relating to the submission of your assessment task. Please consult with your trainer/assessor if you are unsure of any questions. It is important that you understand and adhere to the terms and conditions, and address fully each assessment task.
Written work
Assessment tasks are used to measure your understanding and underpinning skills and knowledge of the overall unit of competency. When undertaking any written assessment tasks, please ensure that you address the following criteria:
· Address each question including any sub-points
· Demonstrate that you have researched the topic thoroughly
· Cover the topic in a logical, structured manner
· Your assessment tasks are well presented, well referenced and word processed
Active participation
It is a condition of enrolment that you actively participate in your studies. Active participation is completing all the assessment tasks on time.
Plagiarism
Plagiarism is taking and using someone else's thoughts, writings or inventions and representing them as your own. Plagiarism is a serious act and may result in a learner’s exclusion from a course. When you have any doubts about including the work of other authors in your assessment, please consult your trainer/assessor. The following list outlines some of the activities for which a learner can be accused of plagiarism:
· Presenting any work by another individual as one's own unintentionally
· Handing in assessments markedly similar to or copied from another learner
· Presenting the work of another individual or group as their own work
· Handing in assessments without the adequate acknowledgement of sources used, including assessments taken totally or in part from the internet.
If it is identified that you have plagiarised within your assessment, then a meeting will be organised to discuss this with you, and further action may be taken accordingly.
Collusion
Collusion is the present ...
The summary evaluates a training program called Determining Instructional Purposes (DIP) for educators. It will collect data through surveys, tests, and interviews to measure the program's effectiveness, quality, and implementation. The evaluation will be conducted by Criteria group and will provide recommendations to Far West Laboratory on continuing the program.
Brian Walman has over 10 years of experience in corporate health and safety management. He is currently the Corporate Health and Safety Manager at Pure Technologies Ltd, where he oversees health and safety programs for over 650 employees. Previously, he held health and safety leadership roles at Enform and Bell Canada. Walman has a Certificate in Occupational Health and Safety from the University of Alberta and a Certificate in Emergency Management from the University of Calgary.
Assessment Booklet
CHCLEG003
Manage legal and ethical compliance
HLTWHS004
Manage work health and safety
Student Name:
Student Number: _________________________
Intake Date: _____________________________
CHCLEG003 - Manage legal and ethical compliance
HLTWHS004 - Manage work health and safety
Version: 1.0 Page 2 of 77
Created: April 2021 Last Reviewed: April 2021
Central Australian Institute of Technology Pty Ltd | CRICOS: 03217C |TOID: 22302
ASSESSMENT COMPETENCY RECORD
This form is to be completed by the assessor and used as the final record of the student competence in these discipline. All
student submissions including any associated documents and checklists are to be attached to this cover sheet before placing on
the students file.
Student results are not to be entered onto the Student Database unless all relevant paperwork is completed and attached to this
form.
Student ID Final Assessment Submission Date:
Student Name
Assessor Declaration
In completing this assessment, it is confirmed that the participant has demonstrated all unit outcomes through consistent and
repeated application of skills with competent performance.
Evidence is confirmed as: ❑ Valid ❑ Sufficient ❑ Current ❑ Authentic
Please attach the following documentation to this form Result
FINAL ASSESSMENT
RESULT:
❑ Competent (C)
❑ Not Yet Competent
(NYC)
Assessment Task 1 ❑ Case Study S / NS
Assessment Task 2 ❑ Case Study S / NS
Assessment Task 3 ❑ Case Study S / NS
Assessment Task 4 ❑ Additional Case Studies S / NS
Assessment Task 5 ❑ Written/Oral Questions S / NS
Attempt Date Assessor’s feedback (as required):
1
2
3
Final Feedback:
DO NOT SIGN BELOW UNTIL FINAL ASSESSMENTS RESULT IS GRANTED BY THE ASSESSOR.
Assessor: I declare that I have conducted a fair, valid, reliable and flexible
assessment with this student, and I have provided appropriate feedback.
Signature: _______________________
Name:__________________________
Date: ____/_____/_____
Student: I declare that I accept the assessment competency outcome and
consider the feedback of my assessor positively. I also declare that the work
submitted is my own, and has not been copied or plagiarised from any person or
source.
Signature: ______________________
Date: ____/_____/_____
Administrative use only:
Entered into Student
Management Database
❑ Signature/Initial ________________ Date: ________________
CHCLEG003 - Manage legal and ethical compliance
HLTWHS004 - Manage work health and safety
Version: 1.0 Page 3 of 77
Created: April 2021 Last Reviewed: April 2021
Central Australian Institute of Technology Pty Ltd | CRICOS: 03217C |TOID: 22302
Unit Code/Name CHCLEG003 Manage legal and ethical compliance
Pre-requisites N/A
Co-requisites N/A
Unit Summary
This unit describes the skills and knowledge required to research information about compliance and
ethical .
The Clinical Development Online Certificate Program provides a self-paced online program to professionals working in science, healthcare, technology or management. The program offers seven courses on drug, biologic and device development regulatory issues and practical knowledge. Students can complete individual courses or the full certificate program in five to eight months. The certificate program costs $2,065 plus a $50 fee and provides 8.4 continuing education units upon completion.
Watch The Webinar Here: https://compliatric.com/continuous-compliance-chapters-10-21/
Compliatric is excited to continue their “Continuous Compliance" Webinar Series based on the existing Health Center Compliance Manual and the most recently updated Site Visit Protocol. Each month, program requirements are reviewed to assist health centers in understanding the various elements and ensuring continuing compliance. Participants will be able to use these webinars to increase their knowledge of the requirements, and go one step further and utilize the program requirements to improve operational excellence.
This month’s webinar will focus on the following chapters:
Chapter 10: Quality Improvement/Assurance
Chapter 21: FTCA Deeming Requirements
Webinar attendee takeaways will include:
· An understanding of the program requirements, which includes updates to the Site Visit Protocol
· Maintaining continuous compliance - not only based on a site visit
· Improving operational excellence for your Community Health Center
WCG International Consultants Ltd provides vocational rehabilitation, employment programming, training and case management services across Canada and delivers assessments like vocational evaluations, functional capacity evaluations, and labour market assessments to develop individual rehabilitation plans and help clients find suitable employment. Their services include vocational counseling, job coaching, job placement assistance, and they partner with external providers for additional assessments like ergonomic or neuropsychological evaluations.
05 integrated management system telkom 2016 penanganan bencana - tanggap da...wisnu wardhana, i nyoman
1) The document outlines standards and procedures for conducting exercises and testing of Telkom's business continuity plans. It discusses defining the scope, participants, objectives, scenarios, and communications for exercises.
2) Exercises and tests should be conducted regularly based on predefined schedules and should involve top management. They assess the feasibility and effectiveness of continuity plans, identify areas for improvement, and confirm the organization's ability to respond to incidents.
3) The results of exercises are documented and used to update plans and strategies. Lessons learned are incorporated to ensure continuous improvement of the business continuity management system.
This document provides an assessment task for the unit BSBWHS201 Contribute to health and safety of self and others. The assessment consists of 3 tasks to evaluate 3 key elements: working safely, implementing work safety requirements, and participating in WHS consultative processes. Task 1 involves answering questions about WHS concepts. Task 2 is a case study evaluating hazards in a burger restaurant workplace. Task 3 matches WHS terms with their definitions. The student must demonstrate competence on all elements and criteria to pass the overall assessment.
Shawn McGoogin has over 15 years of experience in finance, business analysis, and training. He has held roles at Merrill Lynch, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Convergys Corporation, and Vistakon Companies. Currently, he works as a Corporate Action Specialist at Merrill Lynch, where he monitors securities and ensures corporate events are applied correctly to client portfolios.
This document contains a performance evaluation for Janaka Samarathunga. It lists his job title, supervisor, and observers. It outlines his performance goals and accomplishments against those goals for plan year 2015. It evaluates his work behaviors and competencies in areas like health and safety, integrity, interpersonal skills, commitment to quality, and client focus. It rates his overall performance as performing. His strengths are noted as being a hard worker and competent. Areas for improvement include further enhancing communication skills and experience working directly with clients. His development actions and the impact on his work are not specified. The year-end review meeting date is listed as January 25, 2016.
In September, the IAASB held two webinars on its recently proposed International Standard on Sustainability Assurance 5000. The webinars featured presentations and discussions from IAASB members, including those who helped draft the standard.
Find more information on ISSA 5000 on the IAASB website: iaasb.org/ISSA5000
This document provides an examiner's report on the NEBOSH International General Certificate in Occupational Health and Safety - IGC1 exam from March 2009. It includes general comments on candidate performance and comments on individual exam questions. The general comments note that many candidates were well-prepared but some showed a lack of knowledge or understanding of how to apply concepts. Recurrent issues preventing success included a lack of exam technique, failure to answer all questions, and an inability to apply the required command verbs. The comments on individual questions provide example answers and identify what was expected from candidates.
This document provides an examiner's report on the NEBOSH International General Certificate in Occupational Health and Safety - IGC1 exam from March 2009. It includes general comments on candidate performance and comments on individual exam questions. The general comments note that many candidates were well-prepared but some showed a lack of knowledge or understanding of how to apply concepts. Recurrent issues preventing success included a lack of exam technique, failure to answer all questions, and an inability to apply the required command words. The comments on individual questions provide example answers and identify what was expected from candidates.
This document outlines the criteria for accrediting engineering technology programs that is effective for reviews during the 2012-2013 accreditation cycle. It includes general criteria that apply to all programs as well as specific program criteria for various engineering technology disciplines. The general criteria address areas like students, program objectives, student outcomes, continuous improvement, curriculum, faculty, facilities, and institutional support. The document then lists the specific program criteria for over 20 engineering technology program areas.
As Operational Site Visits (OSVs) resume virtually, it is important for Community Health Centers to maintain continuous compliance. Compliatric is excited to continue their “Compliance Webinar Series” where each month, program requirements are reviewed to assist health centers in understanding various elements. Participants will be able to utilize these webinars to increase their knowledge of the requirements, and also take compliance to the next level.
This document provides guidance on the medical appraisal process. It outlines key steps including scheduling an appraisal meeting, completing forms, submitting documents, and reflecting on topics like scope of work, CPD activities, and personal development objectives. The goal is to capture information on the doctor's practice and ensure high quality patient care through an annual review and feedback process.
192020 Capella University Scoring Guide Toolhttpsscor.docxaulasnilda
1/9/2020 Capella University Scoring Guide Tool
https://scoringguide.capella.edu/grading-web/gradingdetails 1/7
MHA-FP5064
u03a1 - Health Information System Implementation
Learner: Monna , Joseph
OVERALL COMMENTS
Mona
This paper is not very clear and specific. You have very genialized explanations of data and are not discussing
data requirements from meaningful use and merit-based incentives. Also you are not supporting the data needs
with CURRENT academic sources. You only have 2 references both from well over 10 years ago. You need
research current trends and best practices from recent sources.
See the rubric below for more specifics.
RUBRICS
1/9/2020 Capella University Scoring Guide Tool
https://scoringguide.capella.edu/grading-web/gradingdetails 2/7
CRITERIA 1
Outline a plan for collecting and analyzing data.
COMPETENCY
Incorporate project management principles into health care administration management and leadership.
NON_PERFORMANCE: Does not outline a plan for collecting and analyzing data.
BASIC:
Outlines a plan for collecting and analyzing data that is impracticable or unlikely to yield limited data for
analysis.
PROFICIENT: Outlines a plan for collecting and analyzing data.
DISTINGUISHED:
Outlines a plan for collecting and analyzing data. Provides a concise and well-articulated outline that
identifies specific data needs and a clear approach to analysis.
Comments:
I am not see a plan that alignes with current trends in health care. Plan needs to address specific data that
would common in an EHR and meet current legislative requirments.
(20%)
1/9/2020 Capella University Scoring Guide Tool
https://scoringguide.capella.edu/grading-web/gradingdetails 3/7
CRITERIA 2
Propose criteria for evaluating organizational needs.
COMPETENCY
Incorporate project management principles into health care administration management and leadership.
NON_PERFORMANCE: Does not propose criteria for evaluating organizational needs.
BASIC:
Proposes criteria for evaluating organizational needs that may lead to erroneous conclusions.
PROFICIENT: Proposes criteria for evaluating organizational needs.
DISTINGUISHED:
Proposes criteria for evaluating organizational needs, and provides relevant, credible evidence that
clearly validates the proposed criteria.
Comments:
Very unclear and is not alinging with best practices from AHIMA, HIMSS or Health IT,gov. Research
current oversight organizations
(16%)
1/9/2020 Capella University Scoring Guide Tool
https://scoringguide.capella.edu/grading-web/gradingdetails 4/7
CRITERIA 3
Outline a plan for generating reports.
COMPETENCY
Incorporate project management principles into health care administration management and leadership.
NON_PERFORMANCE: Does not outline a plan for generating reports.
BASIC:
Outlines a plan for generating reports that is impracticable or unlikely to provide all of the information
necessary to support sound decision making.
PROFICIENT: Outlines a ...
Here are the key next steps after validating your pre-assessment tool:
1. Document the validation process and outcomes. Record how the tool was tested, what was evaluated, any issues identified, and actions taken.
2. Make any necessary changes or improvements to the tool based on the validation results. Modify the tool, assessment methods, guidelines, or training as needed.
3. Implement the validated tool for pre-assessing learners. Use the tool consistently as part of the enrolment process to identify learner support requirements.
4. Review learner pre-assessment results on an ongoing basis. Monitor outcomes for continual improvement opportunities. Look for inconsistencies or gaps to address through future validation.
5. Re
Here are the key next steps after validating your pre-assessment tool:
1. Document the validation process and outcomes. Record how the tool was tested, what was evaluated, any issues identified, and actions taken.
2. Make any necessary changes or improvements to the tool based on the validation results. Modify the tool, assessment methods, guidelines, or training as needed.
3. Implement the validated tool for pre-assessing learners. Use the tool consistently as part of the enrolment process to identify learner support requirements.
4. Review learner pre-assessment results on an ongoing basis. Monitor outcomes for continual improvement opportunities. Look for inconsistencies or gaps to address through future validation.
5. Re
Table of Contents Table of Contents1Assessmenpearlenehodge
Table of Contents
Table of Contents1
Assessment instructions3
Assessment requirements6
Candidate Details7
Assessment – BSBFIN501 - Manage budgets and financial plans7
Activity8
Activity 1A8
Activity 1B9
Activity 1C10
Activity 1A-1C Checklist11
Activity 2A12
Activity 2B13
Activity 2C14
Activity 2D15
Activity 2A-2D Checklist16
Activity 3A18
Activity 3B19
Activity 3C20
Activity 3D21
Activity 3A-3D Checklist22
Knowledge Activity (Q & A)23
Section B: Knowledge Activity (Q&A) Checklist24
Performance Activity25
Performance Activity Checklist29
Competency record to be completed by the assessor31
Case Study A – Communicate details of agreed budget and financial plans to relevant team members32
Case Study B33
Case Study C – Providing support34
Case Study D35
Case Study E36
Case Study F37
Appendix 138
Appendix 239
Appendix 341
Appendix 4- Cash flow Projections for 2021 and 202242
Instructions to Learner
Assessment instructions
Overview
Prior to commencing the assessments, your trainer/assessor will explain each assessment task and the terms and conditions relating to the submission of your assessment task. Please consult with your trainer/assessor if you are unsure of any questions. It is important that you understand and adhere to the terms and conditions, and address fully each assessment task.
Written work
Assessment tasks are used to measure your understanding and underpinning skills and knowledge of the overall unit of competency. When undertaking any written assessment tasks, please ensure that you address the following criteria:
· Address each question including any sub-points
· Demonstrate that you have researched the topic thoroughly
· Cover the topic in a logical, structured manner
· Your assessment tasks are well presented, well referenced and word processed
Active participation
It is a condition of enrolment that you actively participate in your studies. Active participation is completing all the assessment tasks on time.
Plagiarism
Plagiarism is taking and using someone else's thoughts, writings or inventions and representing them as your own. Plagiarism is a serious act and may result in a learner’s exclusion from a course. When you have any doubts about including the work of other authors in your assessment, please consult your trainer/assessor. The following list outlines some of the activities for which a learner can be accused of plagiarism:
· Presenting any work by another individual as one's own unintentionally
· Handing in assessments markedly similar to or copied from another learner
· Presenting the work of another individual or group as their own work
· Handing in assessments without the adequate acknowledgement of sources used, including assessments taken totally or in part from the internet.
If it is identified that you have plagiarised within your assessment, then a meeting will be organised to discuss this with you, and further action may be taken accordingly.
Collusion
Collusion is the present ...
The summary evaluates a training program called Determining Instructional Purposes (DIP) for educators. It will collect data through surveys, tests, and interviews to measure the program's effectiveness, quality, and implementation. The evaluation will be conducted by Criteria group and will provide recommendations to Far West Laboratory on continuing the program.
Brian Walman has over 10 years of experience in corporate health and safety management. He is currently the Corporate Health and Safety Manager at Pure Technologies Ltd, where he oversees health and safety programs for over 650 employees. Previously, he held health and safety leadership roles at Enform and Bell Canada. Walman has a Certificate in Occupational Health and Safety from the University of Alberta and a Certificate in Emergency Management from the University of Calgary.
Assessment Booklet
CHCLEG003
Manage legal and ethical compliance
HLTWHS004
Manage work health and safety
Student Name:
Student Number: _________________________
Intake Date: _____________________________
CHCLEG003 - Manage legal and ethical compliance
HLTWHS004 - Manage work health and safety
Version: 1.0 Page 2 of 77
Created: April 2021 Last Reviewed: April 2021
Central Australian Institute of Technology Pty Ltd | CRICOS: 03217C |TOID: 22302
ASSESSMENT COMPETENCY RECORD
This form is to be completed by the assessor and used as the final record of the student competence in these discipline. All
student submissions including any associated documents and checklists are to be attached to this cover sheet before placing on
the students file.
Student results are not to be entered onto the Student Database unless all relevant paperwork is completed and attached to this
form.
Student ID Final Assessment Submission Date:
Student Name
Assessor Declaration
In completing this assessment, it is confirmed that the participant has demonstrated all unit outcomes through consistent and
repeated application of skills with competent performance.
Evidence is confirmed as: ❑ Valid ❑ Sufficient ❑ Current ❑ Authentic
Please attach the following documentation to this form Result
FINAL ASSESSMENT
RESULT:
❑ Competent (C)
❑ Not Yet Competent
(NYC)
Assessment Task 1 ❑ Case Study S / NS
Assessment Task 2 ❑ Case Study S / NS
Assessment Task 3 ❑ Case Study S / NS
Assessment Task 4 ❑ Additional Case Studies S / NS
Assessment Task 5 ❑ Written/Oral Questions S / NS
Attempt Date Assessor’s feedback (as required):
1
2
3
Final Feedback:
DO NOT SIGN BELOW UNTIL FINAL ASSESSMENTS RESULT IS GRANTED BY THE ASSESSOR.
Assessor: I declare that I have conducted a fair, valid, reliable and flexible
assessment with this student, and I have provided appropriate feedback.
Signature: _______________________
Name:__________________________
Date: ____/_____/_____
Student: I declare that I accept the assessment competency outcome and
consider the feedback of my assessor positively. I also declare that the work
submitted is my own, and has not been copied or plagiarised from any person or
source.
Signature: ______________________
Date: ____/_____/_____
Administrative use only:
Entered into Student
Management Database
❑ Signature/Initial ________________ Date: ________________
CHCLEG003 - Manage legal and ethical compliance
HLTWHS004 - Manage work health and safety
Version: 1.0 Page 3 of 77
Created: April 2021 Last Reviewed: April 2021
Central Australian Institute of Technology Pty Ltd | CRICOS: 03217C |TOID: 22302
Unit Code/Name CHCLEG003 Manage legal and ethical compliance
Pre-requisites N/A
Co-requisites N/A
Unit Summary
This unit describes the skills and knowledge required to research information about compliance and
ethical .
The Clinical Development Online Certificate Program provides a self-paced online program to professionals working in science, healthcare, technology or management. The program offers seven courses on drug, biologic and device development regulatory issues and practical knowledge. Students can complete individual courses or the full certificate program in five to eight months. The certificate program costs $2,065 plus a $50 fee and provides 8.4 continuing education units upon completion.
Watch The Webinar Here: https://compliatric.com/continuous-compliance-chapters-10-21/
Compliatric is excited to continue their “Continuous Compliance" Webinar Series based on the existing Health Center Compliance Manual and the most recently updated Site Visit Protocol. Each month, program requirements are reviewed to assist health centers in understanding the various elements and ensuring continuing compliance. Participants will be able to use these webinars to increase their knowledge of the requirements, and go one step further and utilize the program requirements to improve operational excellence.
This month’s webinar will focus on the following chapters:
Chapter 10: Quality Improvement/Assurance
Chapter 21: FTCA Deeming Requirements
Webinar attendee takeaways will include:
· An understanding of the program requirements, which includes updates to the Site Visit Protocol
· Maintaining continuous compliance - not only based on a site visit
· Improving operational excellence for your Community Health Center
WCG International Consultants Ltd provides vocational rehabilitation, employment programming, training and case management services across Canada and delivers assessments like vocational evaluations, functional capacity evaluations, and labour market assessments to develop individual rehabilitation plans and help clients find suitable employment. Their services include vocational counseling, job coaching, job placement assistance, and they partner with external providers for additional assessments like ergonomic or neuropsychological evaluations.
05 integrated management system telkom 2016 penanganan bencana - tanggap da...wisnu wardhana, i nyoman
1) The document outlines standards and procedures for conducting exercises and testing of Telkom's business continuity plans. It discusses defining the scope, participants, objectives, scenarios, and communications for exercises.
2) Exercises and tests should be conducted regularly based on predefined schedules and should involve top management. They assess the feasibility and effectiveness of continuity plans, identify areas for improvement, and confirm the organization's ability to respond to incidents.
3) The results of exercises are documented and used to update plans and strategies. Lessons learned are incorporated to ensure continuous improvement of the business continuity management system.
This document provides an assessment task for the unit BSBWHS201 Contribute to health and safety of self and others. The assessment consists of 3 tasks to evaluate 3 key elements: working safely, implementing work safety requirements, and participating in WHS consultative processes. Task 1 involves answering questions about WHS concepts. Task 2 is a case study evaluating hazards in a burger restaurant workplace. Task 3 matches WHS terms with their definitions. The student must demonstrate competence on all elements and criteria to pass the overall assessment.
Shawn McGoogin has over 15 years of experience in finance, business analysis, and training. He has held roles at Merrill Lynch, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Convergys Corporation, and Vistakon Companies. Currently, he works as a Corporate Action Specialist at Merrill Lynch, where he monitors securities and ensures corporate events are applied correctly to client portfolios.
This document contains a performance evaluation for Janaka Samarathunga. It lists his job title, supervisor, and observers. It outlines his performance goals and accomplishments against those goals for plan year 2015. It evaluates his work behaviors and competencies in areas like health and safety, integrity, interpersonal skills, commitment to quality, and client focus. It rates his overall performance as performing. His strengths are noted as being a hard worker and competent. Areas for improvement include further enhancing communication skills and experience working directly with clients. His development actions and the impact on his work are not specified. The year-end review meeting date is listed as January 25, 2016.
In September, the IAASB held two webinars on its recently proposed International Standard on Sustainability Assurance 5000. The webinars featured presentations and discussions from IAASB members, including those who helped draft the standard.
Find more information on ISSA 5000 on the IAASB website: iaasb.org/ISSA5000
This document provides an examiner's report on the NEBOSH International General Certificate in Occupational Health and Safety - IGC1 exam from March 2009. It includes general comments on candidate performance and comments on individual exam questions. The general comments note that many candidates were well-prepared but some showed a lack of knowledge or understanding of how to apply concepts. Recurrent issues preventing success included a lack of exam technique, failure to answer all questions, and an inability to apply the required command verbs. The comments on individual questions provide example answers and identify what was expected from candidates.
This document provides an examiner's report on the NEBOSH International General Certificate in Occupational Health and Safety - IGC1 exam from March 2009. It includes general comments on candidate performance and comments on individual exam questions. The general comments note that many candidates were well-prepared but some showed a lack of knowledge or understanding of how to apply concepts. Recurrent issues preventing success included a lack of exam technique, failure to answer all questions, and an inability to apply the required command words. The comments on individual questions provide example answers and identify what was expected from candidates.
This document outlines the criteria for accrediting engineering technology programs that is effective for reviews during the 2012-2013 accreditation cycle. It includes general criteria that apply to all programs as well as specific program criteria for various engineering technology disciplines. The general criteria address areas like students, program objectives, student outcomes, continuous improvement, curriculum, faculty, facilities, and institutional support. The document then lists the specific program criteria for over 20 engineering technology program areas.
As Operational Site Visits (OSVs) resume virtually, it is important for Community Health Centers to maintain continuous compliance. Compliatric is excited to continue their “Compliance Webinar Series” where each month, program requirements are reviewed to assist health centers in understanding various elements. Participants will be able to utilize these webinars to increase their knowledge of the requirements, and also take compliance to the next level.
This document provides guidance on the medical appraisal process. It outlines key steps including scheduling an appraisal meeting, completing forms, submitting documents, and reflecting on topics like scope of work, CPD activities, and personal development objectives. The goal is to capture information on the doctor's practice and ensure high quality patient care through an annual review and feedback process.
1. VUMC Performance Evaluation Status: Final
* - DO=Direct Observation; A=Audit; CF=Customer Feedback
** - UA=Unit Area Specific Function
Performance Development - March 11, 2015
Submit form to Human Resources - Records Management Office (VU Station B #357700)
Page 1
Name: Sonja Campbell Department: Clinical Pharmacology-DOM Supervisor: Robertson Jr,David H
Emp ID: 0082636 Service Date: 07/21/2008 Eval Type: Annual
Job Code: 4445 Job Date: 07/21/2008 Org Unit: Medical Center
Title: Secretary Sr Executive Compliance: Met Eval Period: 05/03/2013-04/30/2014
Credentials
Verified: N/A
Perf Plan/Wrtn Warn: No
Comments
Sonja's first and foremost quality is to maintain a professional work atmosphere and
continuously define the importance of what is required to perform her duties and provide
others with help to meet their work goals. She is an outstanding example of a focused
work oriented individual whose sole purpose is to perform her duties to a standard in
which Vanderbilt is honored to have as a member of its team.
Key Function (Generic and Unit Specific) UA** Weighting Rating Validation*
Perform complex and confidential secretarial duties by: N EVEN 5 DO
Participate in budget management: N EVEN 4.9 DO
Coordinate all personnel-related matters for department, division, or other
organizational unit by:
N EVEN 4.9 DO
Oversee daily operation of department, division or other organizational unit by: N/A N/A N/A N/A
Participate in Project management by showing end results of project, project
evaluation, and appropriate recommendations:
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Key Function Score 100% 4.9
Credo
1. I make those I serve my highest priority 4.9 4. I respect privacy and confidentiality 5.0
2. I have a sense of ownership 5.0 5. I communicate effectively 5.0 Credo Total Score: 5.0
3. I conduct myself professionally 5.0 6. I am committed to my colleagues 4.9
Key Function - 75%: 4.9
Credo - 25%: 5.0
Overall Score Total - 100%: 4.9
Employee Signature Date
Supervisor Signature Date
2. Sonja Campbell (0082636) VUMC Performance Evaluation Status: Final
* - DO=Direct Observation; A=Audit; CF=Customer Feedback
** - UA=Unit Area Specific Function
Performance Development - March 11, 2015
Submit form to Human Resources - Records Management Office (VU Station B #357700)
Page 2
Policy & Safety Compliance
* All items must be completed by the evaluation date.
* Required annually unless noted otherwise
Compliance:
Requirements are Met
Policy Compliance Status Date Completed
Standards of Conduct and Confidentiality Completed 03/19/2014
Conflict of Interest - Evaluations conducted July 1st-Dec 31st will require resubmitting COI
information. (1)
Completed 04/01/2014
Immunization & Screening Compliance (2) Completed 04/24/2014
Vanderbilt Export Compliance Education (3) Completed 03/19/2014
HR Policy Review
Anti-Harassment Completed 03/19/2014
False Claims Act/Whistleblower Protection Completed 03/19/2014
Patient Rights and Responsibilities Completed 03/19/2014
Department Specific Policy Review Status Date Completed
Safety Training Documentation Status Date Completed
Universal Safety Training (4) Completed 03/19/2014
Patient Contact Training (5) N/A
Lab Safety (6) Completed 03/19/2014
Job Specific Training (7) Status Date Completed
HIPAA Compliance Status Date Completed
Privacy and Security (HIPAA) Training Completed 03/19/2014
Update Health Information Categories Completed 04/24/2014
3. Sonja Campbell (0082636) VUMC Performance Evaluation Status: Final
* - DO=Direct Observation; A=Audit; CF=Customer Feedback
** - UA=Unit Area Specific Function
Performance Development - March 11, 2015
Submit form to Human Resources - Records Management Office (VU Station B #357700)
Page 3
(1)The Conflict of Interest field is directly linked to the Conflict of Interest Disclosure System (CDS), found through the Office of Compliance webpage. Conflict of
Interest compliance is defined by the University Conflicts Committee. Individuals must go through the process each fiscal year (July 1-June 30) and their leaders
must approve their disclosure before the item will show as completed. Questions relating to Conflict of Interest compliance status should be directed to <a
href='mailto:coi@vanderbilt.edu'>coi@vanderbilt.edu</a>.
(2)Compliance is supplied electronically by the Occupational Health Clinic. Supervisors may view compliance status for individual programs (without medical
information) through the "Record of Compliance in OHC" report on MyVandy, accessible from the VUMC homepage. Employees may view their own compliance
status for individual programs through the Health & Wellness Information Portal (<a href="https://myhealthandwellness.vanderbilt.edu"
target="_blank">https://myhealthandwellness.vanderbilt.edu</a>). All medical screening requirements applicable to the individual's job and department are
included in compliance status. For a list of all applicable requirements and the relevant VUMC or departmental policies, see <a
href="http://occupationalhealth.vanderbilt.edu/article/vanderbilt-surveillance-program-screening-requirements"
target="_blank">http://occupationalhealth.vanderbilt.edu/article/vanderbilt-surveillance-program-screening-requirements</a>.
(3)For more information and assistance with export control matters, visit or contact the Vanderbilt Export Compliance office at: <a
href="http://www.vanderbilt.edu/exportcompliance" target="_blank">www.vanderbilt.edu/exportcompliance</a> or E-mail: <a
href="mailto:vec@vanderbilt.edu">vec@vanderbilt.edu</a>.
(4)Universal Safety Training, which is required for all VUMC staff and recommended for Univ Central staff includes: Active Shooter (effective Feb 2014),
Ergonomics Awareness, Hazard Communication Awareness, Fire Prevention/Emergency Preparedness and Personal Safety. New staff complete initial training
during "Making a Difference" and "It's Who We Are" orientations and can update their training yearly at the "VUMC Safety Fair". For compliance with Universal
Safety Training, please go to VandySafe at the following link: <a href="http://www.vandysafe.com" target="_blank">www.vandysafe.com</a>
(5)Patient Contact Safety Training required for staff who have contact with patients and/or body fluids and includes: Bloodborne Pathogen-Standard precautions,
Infection Control/Hand Hygiene, Influenza Training, TB precautions, Latex Allergy Awareness, Sharps Safety Devices (if role appropriate), Healthcare Ergonomics,
and High Level Disinfection (if role appropriate). New employees complete initial safety training during "It's Who We Are" and "Role Specific" orientations and can
update their training annually at the "VUMC Safety Fair").
(6)Lab Safety Course recommended for staff working in VUMC and Univ Central research laboratories and includes: Universal Safety Training, Chemical Safety in
the Laboratory, Bloodborne Pathogens - Laboratory specific, Handling/Disposal of Hazardous Waste.
(7)Job Specific Training can include: Handling Cytotoxic Drugs, Caring for Radiation Therapy Patients, X-ray Safety Training, Motorized Equipment Transport, TB
Mask Fitting, Radiation Badge Representative Training, Anesthetic Gases Training, etc.
4. Sonja Campbell (0082636) VUMC Performance Evaluation Status: Final
* - DO=Direct Observation; A=Audit; CF=Customer Feedback
** - UA=Unit Area Specific Function
Performance Development - March 11, 2015
Submit form to Human Resources - Records Management Office (VU Station B #357700)
Page 4
Development Goals
Development Goals: Individual & Department - previous year
No Development Goals exist for the Previous Year
Development Goals: Individual & Department - current year
No Development Goals exist for the Current Year
5. Sonja Campbell (0082636) VUMC Performance Evaluation Status: Final
* - DO=Direct Observation; A=Audit; CF=Customer Feedback
** - UA=Unit Area Specific Function
Performance Development - March 11, 2015
Submit form to Human Resources - Records Management Office (VU Station B #357700)
Page 5
Details & Comments
Key Functions
1. Perform complex and confidential secretarial duties by: UA**: N
Rating: 5 Validation*: DO Weighting: EVEN
Comments
Sonja's performance of any task is a direct result of her strong belief of working in a degree of excellence beyond just getting by.
She provides necessary information & direction to others as needed. Her work ethics are of the highest support quality & she
constantly stays ahead of her tasks.
2. Participate in budget management: UA**: N
Rating: 4.9 Validation*: DO Weighting: EVEN
Comments
Provides ongoing assistance in preparation & completion to meet all deadlines.
3. Coordinate all personnel-related matters for department, division, or other organizational unit by: UA**: N
Rating: 4.9 Validation*: DO Weighting: EVEN
Comments
Meets the standards and processing of those areas that apply.
4. Oversee daily operation of department, division or other organizational unit by: UA**: N
Rating: N/A Validation*: N/A Weighting: N/A
5. Participate in Project management by showing end results of project, project evaluation, and appropriate
recommendations:
UA**: N
Rating: N/A Validation*: N/A Weighting: N/A
Credo
1. I make those I serve my highest priority:
* Answers questions, ensures understanding and facilitates learning.
* Prioritizes to ensure satisfaction despite time pressures and significant obstacles.
* Stays accessible to provide assistance and support when needed.
Rating: 4.9
Comments
Sonja's performance of any task is a direct result of her strong belief of working in a degree of excellence beyond just getting by.
She provides necessary information & direction to others as needed.
2. I have a sense of ownership:
* Takes ownership of problems until resolved.
* Uses appropriate resources to effectively and efficiently resolve problems.
* Willingly participates in discussions on problem resolution, asks for and provides timely and honest feedback.
* Works to make progress towards personal and team goals, despite difficulties.
* Follows departmental policies and procedures. Willingly adapts to new policies and guidelines.
* Willingly accepts challenging assignments. Works to support organizational changes.
* Is mindful of cost of organizational resources and works efficiently and effectively to minimize waste (time, supplies, etc.).
Rating: 5
Comments
Sonja is business minded and highly motivated to perform her tasks in a speedy, yet efficient and positive manner. She has a
remarkable insight to identify tasks she can perform & move forward with little to no direction.
6. Sonja Campbell (0082636) VUMC Performance Evaluation Status: Final
* - DO=Direct Observation; A=Audit; CF=Customer Feedback
** - UA=Unit Area Specific Function
Performance Development - March 11, 2015
Submit form to Human Resources - Records Management Office (VU Station B #357700)
Page 6
3. I conduct myself professionally:
* Recognizes the increasing diversity of our community and seeks to understand the cultures of the individuals we serve.
Communicates and behaves in ways that are culturally appropriate.
* Continuously learns and improves skills.
* Strives to maintain personal well-being and balance of work and personal life.
* Holds self and others accountable for achieving performance expectations.
* Demonstrates safe working practices and maintains a clean work environment.
* Exhibits pleasant and amiable behavior during interactions.
* Remains calm when confronted with or responding to pressure situations.
* Consistently adheres to department and/or medical center policies.
* Refrains from loud talk and excessive noise — a quiet environment is important to heal, learn and work.
* Refrains from criticizing Vanderbilt in the workplace and in the community. Discusses internal issues only with those who need to
know or can solve the problem.
Rating: 5
Comments
I greatly admire Sonja's unique ability to stay focused with the task at hand. She possesses the character to keep personal and
business separate and seeks to ensure her work environment is conducive to what is needed to perform at a very high level of
professionalism.
4. I respect privacy and confidentiality:
* Maintains the confidentiality of sensitive information.
* Discusses confidential matters in a private area and only with the appropriate person(s).
* Keeps written/electronic information out of the view of others and disposes of written information appropriately.
* Knocks prior to entering an office or patient’s room. Asks permission to enter and identifies self using AIDET techniques where
appropriate.
* Follows organizational systems, policies and procedures.
Rating: 5
Comments
She consistently exhibits the importance of respecting space and confidentiality.
5. I communicate effectively:
* Introduces self to others.
* Wears ID badge above the waist where name and title are easily visible. Staff member obtains a temporary badge when they do
not have an ID.
* Smiles, makes eye contact and greets others. Speaks in a culturally appropriate and understandable manner. Shows concern
and interest; actively listens.
* Recognizes that body language and tone of voice are important parts of communication and uses them appropriately.
Continuously gives positive messages through tone of voice and body language.
* Listens and responds professionally to dissatisfied, patients, visitors and/or colleagues.
* Creates clear, complete written communications. Considers perspective and knowledge-level of recipient. Solicits input on
communications.
* Communicates in a timely and appropriate manner.
(Example: Does not use email to resolve complex issues or to address emotionally charged situations.)
Rating: 5
Comments
Sonja provides a welcoming spirit and professionalism at all times. She is able to deliver at a short moment's notice and maintain
a calm presence.
6. I am committed to my colleagues:
* Treats all individuals fairly and with respect.
* Provides constructive feedback privately.
* Promotes cooperation within and across departments.
* Provides open and honest communication to peers and to all members of the Vanderbilt Community.
7. Sonja Campbell (0082636) VUMC Performance Evaluation Status: Final
* - DO=Direct Observation; A=Audit; CF=Customer Feedback
** - UA=Unit Area Specific Function
Performance Development - March 11, 2015
Submit form to Human Resources - Records Management Office (VU Station B #357700)
Page 7
Rating: 4.9
Comments
Sonja's first and foremost quality is to maintain a professional work atmosphere and continuously define the importance of what is
required to perform her duties and provide others with help to meet their work goals.
8. Sonja Campbell (0082636) VUMC Performance Evaluation Status: Final
* - DO=Direct Observation; A=Audit; CF=Customer Feedback
** - UA=Unit Area Specific Function
Performance Development - March 11, 2015
Submit form to Human Resources - Records Management Office (VU Station B #357700)
Page 8
Health Information Categories
Patient privacy is taken seriously at VUMC. As an employee, you are required to protect the privacy and confidentiality of our
patients. Based on the responsibilities of this position, your access to patient information should be limited to the following:
Demographic
Information to identify a person and provide general information (name, address, race, marital status, religion).
Summary Clinical
Clinical information that summarizes patient's condition or treatment. Might include diagnosis, attending physician, etc.
Full Clinical
Information that describes or indicates a patient's health status. Includes: problem lists, history and physical, clinical notes,
orders, results, diagnostic reports, films, images, etc.