Gone are the days when the only way to find relevant patents was to hire a patent attorney. There are many public tools that allow a person to:
* Find Relevant Patents in the US and Abroad.
* Find Published Applications that are in the pipeline but not yet Issued.
* Look to see whether a pending application is heading towards allowance or trash heap.
* Automatically monitor for relevant publications of patent applications.
* Check to see who owns relevant patents.
Provisional Patent Applications,The Good, The Bad, and the UglyKevin E. Flynn
United States Provisional Patent Applications offer an alternative to starting with a non-provisional utility application. To use this tool appropriately, one must know what has to be in the provisional application, what informalities are tolerable, and how the provisional application fits into the patent process.
This presentation introduces entrepreneurs on methods to perform searches for relevant patent applications and issued patents. After this presentation, you will understand 1) the difference between patentability and freedom-to-operate; 2) backward and forward chaining in patent searching; and 3) other specialized search tools. The patent system is intended to provide the public with an encyclopedia of information on technology. Searching the highly indexed patents and published applications is useful as a tool to students or people starting research in a space that is new to them.
NEWS FLASH: //Check our latest course offering on Patent-Business-Strategy over at Udemy here: http://www.udemy.com/patent-business-strategy/ with a 50 per cent launch discount //
This a discussion on patent infringement for academic purpose. Please do NOT consider this legal advice.
[Some material has not been updated for recent changes, so use it at your own risk]
Disclaimer: This is not legal advice.
The ongoing implementation of elements of the America Invents Act represents the biggest changes to US patent code in generations. The impact of such sweeping changes to the US patent systems will be exceptionally significant for life sciences companies whose life blood is dependent on the value of their intellectual property and patents. This is the only event where you will have the opportunity to join your colleagues in an advanced think-tank discussion regarding the practical impact of patent reform on the life sciences industry.
This presentation addresses the why, what, and how to protect inventions from the vantage point of the early-stage, pre-financing, start-up company that is interested in patenting its inventions and developing an intellectual property portfolio that maximizes the company's valuation and sets it up for success during the intellectual property due diligence that accompanies financing rounds, corporate partnerships, commercialization, and merger and acquisition.
NEWS FLASH: //Check our latest course offering on Patent-Business-Strategy over at Udemy here: http://www.udemy.com/patent-business-strategy/ with a 50 per cent launch discount //
A general academic discussion about doctrine of equivalence in US, Japan and other countries as applied by courts in patent infringement cases. [Some material has not been updated for recent changes, so use it at your own risk]
Disclaimer: This is not legal advice.
Provisional Patent Applications,The Good, The Bad, and the UglyKevin E. Flynn
United States Provisional Patent Applications offer an alternative to starting with a non-provisional utility application. To use this tool appropriately, one must know what has to be in the provisional application, what informalities are tolerable, and how the provisional application fits into the patent process.
This presentation introduces entrepreneurs on methods to perform searches for relevant patent applications and issued patents. After this presentation, you will understand 1) the difference between patentability and freedom-to-operate; 2) backward and forward chaining in patent searching; and 3) other specialized search tools. The patent system is intended to provide the public with an encyclopedia of information on technology. Searching the highly indexed patents and published applications is useful as a tool to students or people starting research in a space that is new to them.
NEWS FLASH: //Check our latest course offering on Patent-Business-Strategy over at Udemy here: http://www.udemy.com/patent-business-strategy/ with a 50 per cent launch discount //
This a discussion on patent infringement for academic purpose. Please do NOT consider this legal advice.
[Some material has not been updated for recent changes, so use it at your own risk]
Disclaimer: This is not legal advice.
The ongoing implementation of elements of the America Invents Act represents the biggest changes to US patent code in generations. The impact of such sweeping changes to the US patent systems will be exceptionally significant for life sciences companies whose life blood is dependent on the value of their intellectual property and patents. This is the only event where you will have the opportunity to join your colleagues in an advanced think-tank discussion regarding the practical impact of patent reform on the life sciences industry.
This presentation addresses the why, what, and how to protect inventions from the vantage point of the early-stage, pre-financing, start-up company that is interested in patenting its inventions and developing an intellectual property portfolio that maximizes the company's valuation and sets it up for success during the intellectual property due diligence that accompanies financing rounds, corporate partnerships, commercialization, and merger and acquisition.
NEWS FLASH: //Check our latest course offering on Patent-Business-Strategy over at Udemy here: http://www.udemy.com/patent-business-strategy/ with a 50 per cent launch discount //
A general academic discussion about doctrine of equivalence in US, Japan and other countries as applied by courts in patent infringement cases. [Some material has not been updated for recent changes, so use it at your own risk]
Disclaimer: This is not legal advice.
Introduction to Intellectual Property and Patent SearchingJohn Meier
This presentation provides an overview of copyright, patents, trademarks, and trade secrets. Patents are explained in detail, and strategies for effective prior art patent searches are explained.
Are you interested in patenting your invention but don’t know where to start? Then come to Milwaukee Public Library’s free monthly Patent Searching 101 program. Patent searching is the first step in the patent application process; it ensures your invention is new and thus eligible for a patent. Business librarians will explain the seven-step search process and talk about changes in patent law due to the America Invents Act.
USPTO Patent Search : Unleash the Power of Unexplored Ideas | InventionIPInvention ip
This informative PowerPoint presentation by InventionIP explores the importance of mastering the USPTO Patent Search for fostering creativity and innovation. Discover the steps to conduct a thorough patent search, leverage patent search for innovation, and understand the process of filing a patent application with the USPTO. Gain insights into avoiding reinventing the wheel, validating ideas, identifying potential partners, and staying ahead of the competition. Uncover the power of the USPTO Patent Search and revolutionize your patent search process.
Visit our website at www.inventionip.com
Enhance your FTO search & Quickly Locate Potential IP
Effectively Optimize your Search Keywords
Searching a chemical moiety
Formulation, Polymorphic Patent Search
Better Drafting Strategy
Browsing IP in minutes
Design Around
Reverse Engineer
AI-SDV 2021 - Tony Trippe - The Current State of Machine Learning for Patent ...Dr. Haxel Consult
The use of machine learning in IP activities has increased exponentially over the past five years. At the same time new tools, methods and systems have begun to emerge that seek to make the analysis of patent data easier to accomplish using these techniques. Included in these new developments are a significant number of machine learning systems that have begun coming to market. As these changes continue to occur, it would be useful to review some of the tools, systems, or methods that a patent practitioner has at their disposal. Examples and perspectives on the latest advances in machine learning for IP will be provided. There will also be a tour of ML4Patents.com which is devoted to aggregating content associated with the development of this area.
Introduction to Intellectual Property and Patent SearchingJohn Meier
This presentation provides an overview of copyright, patents, trademarks, and trade secrets. Patents are explained in detail, and strategies for effective prior art patent searches are explained.
Are you interested in patenting your invention but don’t know where to start? Then come to Milwaukee Public Library’s free monthly Patent Searching 101 program. Patent searching is the first step in the patent application process; it ensures your invention is new and thus eligible for a patent. Business librarians will explain the seven-step search process and talk about changes in patent law due to the America Invents Act.
USPTO Patent Search : Unleash the Power of Unexplored Ideas | InventionIPInvention ip
This informative PowerPoint presentation by InventionIP explores the importance of mastering the USPTO Patent Search for fostering creativity and innovation. Discover the steps to conduct a thorough patent search, leverage patent search for innovation, and understand the process of filing a patent application with the USPTO. Gain insights into avoiding reinventing the wheel, validating ideas, identifying potential partners, and staying ahead of the competition. Uncover the power of the USPTO Patent Search and revolutionize your patent search process.
Visit our website at www.inventionip.com
Enhance your FTO search & Quickly Locate Potential IP
Effectively Optimize your Search Keywords
Searching a chemical moiety
Formulation, Polymorphic Patent Search
Better Drafting Strategy
Browsing IP in minutes
Design Around
Reverse Engineer
AI-SDV 2021 - Tony Trippe - The Current State of Machine Learning for Patent ...Dr. Haxel Consult
The use of machine learning in IP activities has increased exponentially over the past five years. At the same time new tools, methods and systems have begun to emerge that seek to make the analysis of patent data easier to accomplish using these techniques. Included in these new developments are a significant number of machine learning systems that have begun coming to market. As these changes continue to occur, it would be useful to review some of the tools, systems, or methods that a patent practitioner has at their disposal. Examples and perspectives on the latest advances in machine learning for IP will be provided. There will also be a tour of ML4Patents.com which is devoted to aggregating content associated with the development of this area.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
3. GOALS
• I want to expose you to a range of tools.
• We won’t have much time to play with
things as we have a lot of ground to
cover.
• Play with the tools and then catch me
after the next TechBreakfast to ask for
the next level of tips in using a particular
tool.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 3
4. There are lots of reasons to search
• Two Biggest reasons
• 1) Patentability
Is an invention really different from the
prior art and
• 2) Freedom to Operate.
Are there more basic patents that have not
expired that block you from entering the market?
Basic bike patent might block fancy mountain bike.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 4
5. Bicycle
Example
• Betty invents simple
Betty bicycle in 2010.
• Gets Patent
• Covers simple two
wheeled, inline, foot
powered, chain
driven, vehicle.
• Mary invents
Mountain Bike in 2016
• She can get a patent
for a bike features
such as 18 gears,
shock-absorbing
suspension, added
toughness for
jumping, et cetera.
7. But who can make what?
• Betty cannot make
Mountain Bikes as they
are covered by Mary‘s
patent.
• Betty can make her own
simple Betty Bicycles.
8. But who can make what?
• Mary cannot make
either the simple
“Betty Bicycle” or a
Mountain Bike as the
simple Betty Bicycle
patent covers both.
9. Mary’s Mountain Bikes
• Patentability
Several of the
improvements in
the mountain bike
can obtain patent
claims over Betty’s
Bike.
Freedom-to-Operate
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 9
One or more claims from the
Betty’s Bike Patent cover a
basic 2 wheel, chain driven,
vehicle, steered by rotating
the front wheel by a handle
bar.
10. What Can
You Do?
While you
cannot reduce
the risk of being
surprised to
zero,you
can reduce the
risk by doing
some looking.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 10
18. PTO Shows TIF Images when you
hit
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 18
19. This is not really a bicycle patent
• But it uses the word bicycle in the text.
• The wheels can be of the bicycle or
garden type but preferably with sealed
bearings, and fabricated with aluminum
or aluminum alloy, because the
aluminum bearing resists well rust and
fatigue.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 19
20. That’s the danger of text
searching entire documents.
We will cover ways to focus
on patent that are directed to
a term rather than just
mention it.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 20
21. You can get a PDF from
http://pat2pdf.org/
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 21
22. Combo Plan
• If it is a patent I want to study. I will take the
text from the PTO site and put it into a word
document.
• I will get the PDF too.
• Then I can annotate the PDF of the figures using
Adobe Acrobat and place the annotated figures
into the text.
• I can use WORD Replace to find words of
interest and replace with LARGE WORDS IN
COLOR
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 22
23. USPTO ADVANCED SEARCH
• Allows max control to look for specific terms
in specific fields. May be useful if you have an
inventor of interest named Bass or some
other common noun.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 23
24. To search for design patents I did for
NC inventors…
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 24
25. PTO Fields & Syntax
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 25
26. Click on a field to get the syntax
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 26
27. A good way to limit search is to
look for keywords in fields.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 27
Field(s) searched Number found with Spine
Entire Patent 42,267 – too many –
some of this may be junk
Claims only 8,846
Abstract only 5,397
Claims or Abstract 10,455
Title Only 990 – title is too short
to be a good search field
28. 10,000 is still too much
• But you would want to combine
search for patents with a focus on
the spine with other search terms or
date limits to further limit the
search.
• Using the results from a search just
of titles would not be the way I
would do it. Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 28
29. Can nest and stack commands
• Results of Search in US Patent
Collection db for:
(((ABST/spine ANDNOT
ABST/Book) AND (ACLM/Spine
ANDNOT ACLM/book)) AND
fusion): 796 patents.
Hits 1 through 50 out of 796
• Allows you to find patents with spine in the abstract
and in the or claims but not book spine patents.
Interested in spine fusion but not spine fusion for books.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 29
31. Other Major Search tool is Google
• It is worth playing with both
search tools as each as some
features not found in the other.
• Examples -- Google allows pulling
PDF and shows updates to legal
status.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 31
32. Searching On Google Patent
• https://patents.google.com/
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 32
33. On Google or USPTO
use quotes for phrases
Searching for hood latch
31,878 hits
Searching for “hood latch”
2,296 -- 90+% reduction
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 33
34. Limiting Search to Just
US Patents & Published Apps.
Hit the pencil to get options
Hit MOREto get more options
Set Patent Office to US
Now just 769 hits.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 34
35. Focus on Just Issued Patents
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 35
Set filing status to
“Grant” for issued
Now just 580
37. If you sort by date
•You may get patents which
mention a hood latch on
page 23 but do not claim a
hood latch.
•But sometimes date is key
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 37
38. Any Search You Run will Be
imperfect and Miss something
• Some patents were translated into English and
use unusual terms rather than the ones we
might use.
• Some terms are simply arbitrary. Example the
modules in some computer applications.
– A testing module for some person may be the
verification engine for someone else.
• Terms used in claims can be really odd.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 38
39. You may be tempted to write…
• The Mother of all Searches.
• Every possible synonym and use lots of OR
clauses to search the entire patent so as to
not miss anything.
•DO NOT DO THIS.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 39
40. Life is too Short
• If you set your search net so fine that it
collects everything of possible interest,
it will also collect 10 to 1000 irrelevant
items for every relevant one.
• When you see you have 10,000 hits,
you will give up before you check all
10,000
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 40
41. When Searching – Just get the big
fish with a coarsenet
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 41
42. Use A Coarse Net and Grab Just the
BIG FISH.
• The Big Fish will lead you the others
of consequence through
• Backward Chaining – finding patents
from the Past
• Forward Chaining – finding patents
issued after the patent you found.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 42
47. Picked Cited by –
US20060099838A1
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 47
48. Note this is a published application
not a patent.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 48
The USPTO would not show this not yet
issued application as citing the original
patent but they would show patents
that cite the original patent.
50. Backwards Chaining USPTO
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 50
PTO site does not show which
references were cited by the
Examiner vs listed by the
applicant but the PDF does
51. Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 51
See the Asterisks for References used By the USPTO
These are likely to be the more important references
(This PDF example is unrelated to hood latches)
52. USPTO Forward Chaining
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 52
Use Referenced By to have the
USPTO formulate a search for
newer patents that reference
the patent you are viewing.
53. USPTO Finds 6 US Patents
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 53
Google listed some foreign patents or
applications but did not show the US Design
Patent. Each system will find slightly
different results.
54. Chaining forms a Net
• When you find a half dozen really
relevant patents and backward chain
from them, you will find more that are
relevant and some that have a feature
you don’t care about.
• When you forward chain from the
original 6 and the ones found in
backward chaining, you will find more.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 54
55. Continue till it stops yielding
new patents.
• Backward chain the new
patents.
• Forward chain what you find.
• Eventually, you will stop
finding new relevant patents
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 55
56. What if you find a Published App
that claims the “wheel”
•Your mountain bike is going
to use two wheels.
•You may be concerned as a
patent on the wheel will be
a problem for your plans.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 56
57. Do you want to
check to see if the
USPTO has
noticed that the
Roman chariots
are prior art as
they had wheels?
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 57
58. You can check using
USPTO PUBLIC PAIR
• For Any Published Application
–You can see the status
–You can see and download all
the documents from the
applicant to the USPTO and
from the USPTO to the
applicant.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 58
59. FOOTNOTE
• If the applicant opts out of publication,
then you see NOTHING till the patent
issues.
• Non-publication is a good plan for a small
US client that does not plan to seek
patents out of the US. (highly disruptive)
• But this is beyond the scope of the
program today.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 59
60. USPTO PUBLIC PAIR
• PUBLIC – means anyone can use.
• PRIVATE PAIR is a system for folks with
special access codes like Patent Attorneys.
• PRIVATE PAIR adds a few features that are of
use when managing a patent for a client, like
record of fees paid, an estimate of the first
Office Action, and some other data.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 60
65. We can see the sequence
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 65
66. We can pull the documents
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 66
67. We can see what the PTO argued
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 67
68. We can see if they have a
related application pending
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 68
They tried, but that one died too.
Sometimes we can jump to that case.
69. We can see in PAIR who owns the
patent or application.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 69
70. We can Check to see what else they
own.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 70
http://assignment.uspto.gov/
Pick advanced search
73. Drill down to see what they have
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 73
A design patent on a excavator rigging socket
74. For Issued Patents or
Published Applications You
can Order a copy of the
Assignment
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 74
37 CFR 1.12 - Assignment records
open to public inspection.
75. MAINTENANCE FEES
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 75
United States utility Patents need to
be renewed every 4 years or they
expire.
Sometimes it is useful to find out if
the maintenance fees have been
paid to know if a patent is still in
force.
76. In order to check status of
Maintenance Fees,
you will need both patent number &
application number
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 76
77. Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2012 77
https://ramps.uspto.gov/eram/patentMaintFees.do
Select
78. So the 4 year fee
should have been paid.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 78
79. Check 4 Year Payment Window
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 79
So this
maintenance
fee was paid
and the
patent is still
in force.
If the patent owner did not renew the
patent by paying the maintenance fee,
then the patent expires.
There is a liberal opportunity to pay
this late, so get your patent attorney
to look at a situation where you find
that a key patent to your FTO analysis
has expired.
82. Buggy Result
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 82
20160050954 –
Novel confectionery with improved crunchiness
The present invention relates to a novel
composition for a non-cariogenic pharmaceutical
or confectionery product obtained via a hard
sweet-coating process and having improved
crispiness relative to the prior art products.
83. Searching Outside of US.
Start with PCT applications
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 83
https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/search
.jsf
https://patentscope.wipo.int/se
arch/en/search.jsf
84. Simple Search of Front Page of
Application
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 84
85. Hit then Field Combination
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 85
89. Art Classifications
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 89
As children we learned the Dewey
Decimal System so we could find
the books on dinosaurs which were
stored on a different shelf from the
books on volcanos or books on the
Civil War.
90. Patents are Grouped too
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 90
The pile of patents for bicycles is stored
separately from the pile of patents for hood
latches.
Art Classes were Really important when someone
looked at the physical piles of patents.
Now with electronic searching, it is less important
BUT can be a useful filter.
91. Many Different Patent Classification
Systems
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 91
US had its own system which it tweaked
over the years. So our old Hood Latch
patent may not use the same art class
codes as new hood latch patent.
93. It takes time to learn the codes
• 292.59 from our hood latches is actually
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 93
94. Sometimes you can discern the
codes to use based on your best
patent finds.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 94
95. Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 95
Current US Classification (CCL)
This field contains the original and cross-reference
classes in which the patent was classified at the time
of the most recent PTO Master Classification File.
TIP: If you are searching for a specific class and
subclass, you should phrase your query as
ccl/class/subclass, for example, ccl/2/5. Some
subclasses can contain decimal and alpha modifiers
(for example, 427/2.31 or 427/3A).
TIP: If you are searching for the entire contents of a
specific class without specifying a particular subclass,
you should use right truncation, as in ccl/427/$.
97. Class Codes
•Not my favorite way to
search
•But can be useful to focus
search if text terms alone
are not getting it done.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 97
98. Moving to CPC Codes
(to be used by US and Europe)
• You can browse USPC or CPC starting through
the code hierarchy.
• http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classificat
ion/cpc.html
• http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classificat
ion/selectnumwithtitle.htm
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 98
99. USPTO Teaches a Patent Search
Process with Focus On Search
Classes
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 99
100. Special USPTO Tools
• There are special search tools that are
used by the USPTO Patent Examiners to
do their work.
• Presumably these offer some advantages
over the tools I shared with you.
• NOTE – The USPTO has equipped certain
libraries with access to these tools and
specially trained librarians.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 100
101. NCSU is one such place
• The Patent Librarian can
• provide a brief orientation to available materials and
resources, as well as general guidance on searching
patents and trademarks;
• help you identify historical patents and inventors using
print materials, such as Patent Indexes and Official
Gazettes;
• contact experts at the USPTO for specialized questions
or research needs beyond the scope of the Libraries'
service;
• point you to online tutorials and other reliable and
informative web resources.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 101
102. Contact Info
• Greg Tourino
Associate Director
Centennial Campus Research
Services
kgtourin@ncsu.edu
(919) 513-3862
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 102
104. Help Build
The Next Version of this Talk
• Send an email to KEF@FLYNNipLAW.com
• Subject – Patent Search Talk
• Tell me what you wished I spent more time
on.
• Tell me what you wished I skipped.
• Tell me what you felt was confusing.
Copyright FLYNN IP LAW 2016 104