The document discusses the formation and purpose of the International Criminal Court (ICC). Key points:
- The ICC was established in 2002 when enough countries ratified the Rome Treaty developed in 1998. It will have jurisdiction over war crimes, genocide, crimes against humanity, and aggression committed by individuals from member states.
- The ICC aims to prosecute serious international crimes when member states are unable or unwilling to do so themselves. It can investigate and prosecute individuals even from non-member states for such crimes.
- Supporters believe the ICC will help establish a universal rule of law and deter tyranny and violence. However, some questions remain about issues like national sovereignty and how the court will function in practice.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Egyptian Coordination of Rights and Freedoms affirms that the principles of the Universal Declaration of Child's right provides for the protection of children by all possible means and ways against all types of violations. The new Egyptian constitution emphasizes at Article 79 that: "The state is committed to establishment of a judicial system for victims children, witnesses, and shall not be asked him as criminal accountable or detained him except in accordance with the law and for the specified period and provide him with legal assistance, to be detained in appropriate and separate places away adult detention ".
This if we are talking about the state of the law, but in our present, those rights had been violated beyond any doubt that the youth of the future and tomorrow may become victims of today. We find that the security services to children is also further violation of article 31 of the Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, which stipulates: "Corporal punishment and sentence the situation in a dark cell, and any cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, totally banned as disciplinary punishment".
According to what we have monitored, there are more than 3,200 children under the age of 18 years in various detention centers all over the country.In addition the arbitrary detention of children and faced illogical charges, including the burning of police stations, joining a terrorist group, possession of weapons and explosives, and work to overthrow the government, while some children have been arrested and have been charges, accordance with what has been monitored after police failed to arrest on their parents.
On the other hand, the children under 18 years have suffered violations directly inside the detention centers and care homes, and spotted 78 cases were practiced against them direct operations sexual assault, and more than 948 cases of physical torture just in Central Security camps. Witness of minors indicate that they had been beaten, launching for the dogs, tortured by burning with cigarettes and electric shocks and arrived to sexual abuse, in complete abdication from the Egyptian authorities for local and international legal and human rights
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT - FACT SHEETVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
The International Criminal Court
For more than half a century since the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials, states have largely
failed to bring to justice those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. With the creation of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the world has begun to fulfill the post-World War II promise of “never again.” The ICC is the world’s first permanent, international judicial body capable of bringing perpetrators to justice and providing redress to victims when states are unable or unwilling to do so. This represents a major stride for international justice. . .
What crimes does the Court prosecute?
The ICC can prosecute and bring to justice individuals accused of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.
How do cases come before the Court?
Cases come before the court in one of three ways: (1) The Court’s Prosecutor can initiate an investigation into a situation where one or more of the crimes has been committed, based on information from any source, including the victim or the victim’s family, but only if the Court has jurisdiction over the crime and individual. (2) States that have ratified the Rome Statute may ask the Prosecutor to investigate a situation where one or more of the crimes have been committed. (3) The U.N. Security Council can ask the Prosecutor to investigate a situation where one or more of the crimes have been committed, even if the crimes occurred in the territory of a state that has not ratified the Rome Statute or was committed by the national of such a state.
What is the U.S. position on the Court?
…the ICC would only investigate cases involving U.S. nationals if the U.S. failed to investigate and, if appropriate, prosecute the individuals responsible. …
With WARMEST Regards,
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi 39286
(513) 680-2922
DONATIONS to support the work may be made at:
www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome
CONFIDENTIAL/ANONYMOUS Donations may be made at:
https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
The “.02% DELEGATION” Website: www.vogeldenisenewsome.com
THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT (ICC) AND MYANMAR-BANGLADESHMYO AUNG Myanmar
The International Criminal Court (ICC) investigates and, where warranted, tries individuals charged with the gravest crimes of concern to the international community: genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and the crime of aggression.
The Court is participating in a global fight to end impunity, and through international criminal justice, the Court aims to hold those responsible accountable for their crimes and to help prevent these crimes from happening again.
The Court cannot reach these goals alone. As a court of last resort, it seeks to complement, not replace, national Courts. Governed by an international treaty called the Rome Statute, the ICC is the world’s first permanent international criminal court.
https://www.icc-cpi.int/rohingya-myanmar
Preliminary examination Bangladesh/Myanmar(ONGOING)
https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item.aspx?name=180918-otp-stat-Rohingya
Related Documents
18 September 2018
Statement of ICC Prosecutor, Mrs Fatou Bensouda, on opening a Preliminary Examination concerning the alleged deportation of the Rohingya people from Myanmar to Bangladesh
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBDakDv9s2o&feature=youtu.be
https://www.dropbox.com/s/mszr5ktqh7a8ta0/Statement_of_ICC_Prosecutor_on_opening_a_Preliminary_Examination_concerning_the_Rohingya.mp4?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xjfulzz77bl3nf5/Statement_of_ICC_Prosecutor_on_opening_a_Preliminary_Examination_concerning_the_Rohingya.mp3?dl=0
https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo=ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-1
https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2018_02057.PDF
https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo=ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-36
Notice of the Public Statement Issued by the Government of Myanmar
ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-36
17 August 2018 | Office of the Prosecutor | Notice
https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo=ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-28
Decision Inviting the Competent Authorities of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar to Submit Observations pursuant to Rule 103(1) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence on the “Prosecution’s Request for a Ruling on Jurisdiction under Article 19(3) o
ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-28
21 June 2018 | Pre-Trial Chamber I | Decision
https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo=ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-31
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Egyptian Coordination of Rights and Freedoms affirms that the principles of the Universal Declaration of Child's right provides for the protection of children by all possible means and ways against all types of violations. The new Egyptian constitution emphasizes at Article 79 that: "The state is committed to establishment of a judicial system for victims children, witnesses, and shall not be asked him as criminal accountable or detained him except in accordance with the law and for the specified period and provide him with legal assistance, to be detained in appropriate and separate places away adult detention ".
This if we are talking about the state of the law, but in our present, those rights had been violated beyond any doubt that the youth of the future and tomorrow may become victims of today. We find that the security services to children is also further violation of article 31 of the Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, which stipulates: "Corporal punishment and sentence the situation in a dark cell, and any cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, totally banned as disciplinary punishment".
According to what we have monitored, there are more than 3,200 children under the age of 18 years in various detention centers all over the country.In addition the arbitrary detention of children and faced illogical charges, including the burning of police stations, joining a terrorist group, possession of weapons and explosives, and work to overthrow the government, while some children have been arrested and have been charges, accordance with what has been monitored after police failed to arrest on their parents.
On the other hand, the children under 18 years have suffered violations directly inside the detention centers and care homes, and spotted 78 cases were practiced against them direct operations sexual assault, and more than 948 cases of physical torture just in Central Security camps. Witness of minors indicate that they had been beaten, launching for the dogs, tortured by burning with cigarettes and electric shocks and arrived to sexual abuse, in complete abdication from the Egyptian authorities for local and international legal and human rights
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT - FACT SHEETVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
The International Criminal Court
For more than half a century since the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials, states have largely
failed to bring to justice those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. With the creation of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the world has begun to fulfill the post-World War II promise of “never again.” The ICC is the world’s first permanent, international judicial body capable of bringing perpetrators to justice and providing redress to victims when states are unable or unwilling to do so. This represents a major stride for international justice. . .
What crimes does the Court prosecute?
The ICC can prosecute and bring to justice individuals accused of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.
How do cases come before the Court?
Cases come before the court in one of three ways: (1) The Court’s Prosecutor can initiate an investigation into a situation where one or more of the crimes has been committed, based on information from any source, including the victim or the victim’s family, but only if the Court has jurisdiction over the crime and individual. (2) States that have ratified the Rome Statute may ask the Prosecutor to investigate a situation where one or more of the crimes have been committed. (3) The U.N. Security Council can ask the Prosecutor to investigate a situation where one or more of the crimes have been committed, even if the crimes occurred in the territory of a state that has not ratified the Rome Statute or was committed by the national of such a state.
What is the U.S. position on the Court?
…the ICC would only investigate cases involving U.S. nationals if the U.S. failed to investigate and, if appropriate, prosecute the individuals responsible. …
With WARMEST Regards,
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi 39286
(513) 680-2922
DONATIONS to support the work may be made at:
www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome
CONFIDENTIAL/ANONYMOUS Donations may be made at:
https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
The “.02% DELEGATION” Website: www.vogeldenisenewsome.com
THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT (ICC) AND MYANMAR-BANGLADESHMYO AUNG Myanmar
The International Criminal Court (ICC) investigates and, where warranted, tries individuals charged with the gravest crimes of concern to the international community: genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and the crime of aggression.
The Court is participating in a global fight to end impunity, and through international criminal justice, the Court aims to hold those responsible accountable for their crimes and to help prevent these crimes from happening again.
The Court cannot reach these goals alone. As a court of last resort, it seeks to complement, not replace, national Courts. Governed by an international treaty called the Rome Statute, the ICC is the world’s first permanent international criminal court.
https://www.icc-cpi.int/rohingya-myanmar
Preliminary examination Bangladesh/Myanmar(ONGOING)
https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item.aspx?name=180918-otp-stat-Rohingya
Related Documents
18 September 2018
Statement of ICC Prosecutor, Mrs Fatou Bensouda, on opening a Preliminary Examination concerning the alleged deportation of the Rohingya people from Myanmar to Bangladesh
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBDakDv9s2o&feature=youtu.be
https://www.dropbox.com/s/mszr5ktqh7a8ta0/Statement_of_ICC_Prosecutor_on_opening_a_Preliminary_Examination_concerning_the_Rohingya.mp4?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xjfulzz77bl3nf5/Statement_of_ICC_Prosecutor_on_opening_a_Preliminary_Examination_concerning_the_Rohingya.mp3?dl=0
https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo=ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-1
https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2018_02057.PDF
https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo=ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-36
Notice of the Public Statement Issued by the Government of Myanmar
ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-36
17 August 2018 | Office of the Prosecutor | Notice
https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo=ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-28
Decision Inviting the Competent Authorities of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar to Submit Observations pursuant to Rule 103(1) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence on the “Prosecution’s Request for a Ruling on Jurisdiction under Article 19(3) o
ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-28
21 June 2018 | Pre-Trial Chamber I | Decision
https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo=ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-31
The principle of universal jurisdiction allows the national authorities of any state to investigate and prosecute people for serious international crimes even if they were committed in another country. For example, this means that the German government could, if it chose to do so, prosecute U.S. officials for crimes committed in Iraq and Afghanistan. - http://www.childabductioncourt.eu
Essay On International Law
International Law
Essay On International Law
International Law as Law Essay
Essay on International Humanitarian Law
Essay on International Law
Private International Law Essay
Running Head DEATH PENALTY1 DEATH PENALTY8.docxtodd271
Running Head: DEATH PENALTY 1
DEATH PENALTY 8
DEATH PENALTY
Jimetria Grice
Colorado Technical University
Rhonda Ntepp
Death penalty is commonly referred to as the capital punishment which refers to the action taken by the government as sanction to discipline and punish law offenders who have been found guilty of committing crime equitable to death. The government conducts the act in line with the provision of the court of law and order. The execution of the death penalty is termed as death penalty or death punishment. The penalties are normally conducted as punishment. The criminals mostly posted on perpetrators of international and country wars and conflicts and treason activities, regional wars and crimes leading to massive deaths and killings, genocide activities and all sort of crimes against the will and desires of the humanity. In most cases the government executes the death punishment through beheading of the criminals. However, most countries have gone against the death penalty terming it unconstitutional and against the will of the human rights. The European Union has gone further to describe the fundamental rights and termed use and implication of death penalties as violation of human rights. Some countries however still apply the death penalties such as Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan countries to punish the law offenders and criminals. The U.S judicial system has also manipulated the death penalty to safeguard the human rights. I personally oppose corporal death punishment and I support the abolishment of the inhuman act since it ruins and interferes with the human rights.
The death penalty is an infringement of human rights and ought to in this way be annulled. Different types of disciplines ought to be applied as opposed to death retribution. Most nations practice capital punishment on murder, war, fear monger acts or injustice cases (Acker, 2017). A few nations then again do the death penalty on inappropriate behavior and wrongdoings, for example, assault cases, homosexuality activities, incest and detailed infidelity hand with strict violations. Some likewise lead the punishment on tranquilize dealers and traffickers. China executes capital punishment on genuine defilement cases just as human dealers and traffickers. In any case, casualties of weakness and disobedience offenses in military missions face capital punishment.
The death penalty is probably the best infringement of Human Rights. This torment of life is against the Human Rights Charter. Nobody has the privilege to end a real existence, in any event, as indicated by the scriptural implication of life. The brutal and savage act is against God's instructions and it ought to be exceptionally censured. Human activists consistently restrict the death penalty. It ought to be canceled as it denies the Human Rights under the International Human reprieve (Garrett, B. L. (2019). An equal move ought to be made however not just passing. Detainm.
The principle of universal jurisdiction allows the national authorities of any state to investigate and prosecute people for serious international crimes even if they were committed in another country. For example, this means that the German government could, if it chose to do so, prosecute U.S. officials for crimes committed in Iraq and Afghanistan. - http://www.childabductioncourt.eu
Essay On International Law
International Law
Essay On International Law
International Law as Law Essay
Essay on International Humanitarian Law
Essay on International Law
Private International Law Essay
Running Head DEATH PENALTY1 DEATH PENALTY8.docxtodd271
Running Head: DEATH PENALTY 1
DEATH PENALTY 8
DEATH PENALTY
Jimetria Grice
Colorado Technical University
Rhonda Ntepp
Death penalty is commonly referred to as the capital punishment which refers to the action taken by the government as sanction to discipline and punish law offenders who have been found guilty of committing crime equitable to death. The government conducts the act in line with the provision of the court of law and order. The execution of the death penalty is termed as death penalty or death punishment. The penalties are normally conducted as punishment. The criminals mostly posted on perpetrators of international and country wars and conflicts and treason activities, regional wars and crimes leading to massive deaths and killings, genocide activities and all sort of crimes against the will and desires of the humanity. In most cases the government executes the death punishment through beheading of the criminals. However, most countries have gone against the death penalty terming it unconstitutional and against the will of the human rights. The European Union has gone further to describe the fundamental rights and termed use and implication of death penalties as violation of human rights. Some countries however still apply the death penalties such as Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan countries to punish the law offenders and criminals. The U.S judicial system has also manipulated the death penalty to safeguard the human rights. I personally oppose corporal death punishment and I support the abolishment of the inhuman act since it ruins and interferes with the human rights.
The death penalty is an infringement of human rights and ought to in this way be annulled. Different types of disciplines ought to be applied as opposed to death retribution. Most nations practice capital punishment on murder, war, fear monger acts or injustice cases (Acker, 2017). A few nations then again do the death penalty on inappropriate behavior and wrongdoings, for example, assault cases, homosexuality activities, incest and detailed infidelity hand with strict violations. Some likewise lead the punishment on tranquilize dealers and traffickers. China executes capital punishment on genuine defilement cases just as human dealers and traffickers. In any case, casualties of weakness and disobedience offenses in military missions face capital punishment.
The death penalty is probably the best infringement of Human Rights. This torment of life is against the Human Rights Charter. Nobody has the privilege to end a real existence, in any event, as indicated by the scriptural implication of life. The brutal and savage act is against God's instructions and it ought to be exceptionally censured. Human activists consistently restrict the death penalty. It ought to be canceled as it denies the Human Rights under the International Human reprieve (Garrett, B. L. (2019). An equal move ought to be made however not just passing. Detainm.
1. not have retroactive
power, but will only
prosecute crimes com-
mitted after its forma-
tion.
For those concerned
about national sover-
eignty, proponents of
the Rome Treaty assure
that the ICC will not
trump national govern-
ments' responsibility to
be the primary prosecu-
tors for serious interna-
tional crimes. They say
that the ICC will only
intervene as a last
resort, when a country
cannot or will not pros-
ecute human rights vio-
lators.
However, the formation
of the International
Criminal Court gener-
ates a great many ques-
tions:
Continued on page 18
from any country for
crimes against humani-
ty.
How will it work?
The court will have the
power to try individuals
from any country,
regardless of whether
their country has rati-
fied the treaty. Only
nations or persons from
countries that have rati-
fied the treaty, however,
may bring charges to
the court. The United
Nations may also bring
charges on behalf of
other nations or groups.
To prevent petty griev-
ances from being
brought before the
court, prosecutors will
need to get permission
from three pre-trial
judges to begin investi-
gations. The court will
ON THE INSIDE
LOCAL CHURCH NEWS
P.A.W. Conference
held in Rome Page 9
VBS Listings Page 4
COMMENTARY
FAVORITES
Joyce Meyer
Life in the Word Page 5
ENTERTAINMENT
John Smoltz, Atlanta Braves PitcherPage 6
MONTHLY FEATURES
Church Happenings
Page 18
Pastor Profile
Page 8
S u r v i v i n g
mostly from the pro-
ceeds of their Thrift
Stores, the Rome
Salvation Army has
existed since 1898.
They also give away
some of the clothing
that is donated once
each month. Last year
alone, they
gave away
50,000 items.
Major Loyd
Kerns is the
C o r p s
Officer of the
Rome
d i v i s i o n .
Every Corps
Officer is an
o r d a i n e d
m i n i s t e r .
Kerns completed his
education at The
Salvation Army
School for Officers
Training in Atlanta. In
the "Army" for 23
years Kerns came from
Columbus, Georgia,
where he served for 6
years and has been
here in Rome for the
past 3 years.
Each Corps
Community Center
can tailor its religious
The International
Criminal Court (ICC)
was signed into reality
in early April when ten
countries - six more
than needed - ratified
the 'Rome Treaty'
developed in Rome
starting in 1998. Sixty-
six nations have ratified
the treaty so far, and
nearly 100 others may
do so in the future.
A large number of
countries and groups
are excited about the
prospect of an interna-
tional court that would
have jurisdiction over
the entire world, to
bring to justice those
who have shed large
amounts of human
blood. The internation-
al community would
have a permanent
means for trying indi-
viduals for genocide,
crimes against humani-
ty, war crimes and
aggression. Many
believe this will create a
universal rule of law,
and will be a means of
squelching tyranny and
violence around the
world.
There has never been a
court with the power of
the International
Criminal Court.
Temporary ad hoc tri-
bunals have been set up
in the past to try genoci-
dal and war criminals -
such as the Nuremburg
trials. The International
Court of Justice is a per-
manent judicial body,
but it rules between
governments and can-
not prosecute individu-
als. However, when the
ICC is formally created
on July 1, 2002, it will
become a permanent
court for the purpose of
trying any individual
Romes Salvation Army Serving since 1898
Ministries
“Bubba” Cathy of Chick fil A
Ministers to Married Couples
Page 6
The
Christian
Times
floyd polk bartow & gordon counties
Formerly
VOLUME 1 ISSUE 7 FREE MONTHLY PUBLICATION JUNE 2002
services to the cultural
patterns and needs of
the people it serves.
Some of the services
offered in Rome, along
with a place of wor-
ship, are Emergency
Financial Aid - which
can only be used once
every 12 months to
help with rent, utilities,
and prescriptions;
Emergency Shelter -
the center in Rome can
house 18 men and 6
women, offering 5
days at no cost, and $7
per night after that; the
Community Meal is
served to whomever
needs to come 365
days per year, and
Rome averages 35
people per day.
The largest
need in Rome is more
housing for families.
While the center can
certainly help a family
in need, it is very limit-
ed by the one-room
facilities now avail-
able. In fact, there is
currently no one in the
community who can
Continued on Page 12
'Peace! Peace!' The International
Criminal CourtSPECIAL COLUMNS
The Lighter Side
George Nix Page 6
The Christian Sports Report
Page 14