SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 21
Download to read offline
Page 1 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007
coexistence environment | 3/4
Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015
OWA CLIENT PROTOCOL CONNECTIVITY
FLOW IN EXCHANGE 2013/2007
COEXISTENCE ENVIRONMENT | 3/4 | PART
18#23
The current article, is the third article of four articles series, on the subject of:
“Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment and mail client protocol
connectivity flow”.
In this article, we will review the client protocol connectivity flow of:
OWA Exchange 2007 clients in an Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment.
Page 2 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007
coexistence environment | 3/4
Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015
The current section, is dedicated to the description of the OWA client protocol
connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment.
When reading the description of the different OWA client protocol connectivity
scenarios and the details of each scenario, you might experience a slight headache.
It’s ok, despite the risk of the “slight headache”, I think that it’s worth putting in the
effort, to be able to understand the concept and the logic of the OWA client
protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment.
Page 3 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007
coexistence environment | 3/4
Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015
Two main characteristics of the OWA mail
client that Differentiate him from other
Exchange clients
The client protocol connectivity flow of OWA mail client has two main
characteristics that are different from another mail client such as: Outlook or
ActiveSync mail clients.
1. Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment
Compared to most of the client protocol connectivity flow in which the Exchange
CAS 2013 Proxy mail client request to their “legacy Exchange CAS server”, in a
scenario of the Exchange 2007 OWA client, Exchange CAS 2013 will not Proxy the
2007 OWA client connection request but instead, send a redirection command
to the 2007 OWA client.
Page 4 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007
coexistence environment | 3/4
Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015
2. Specifying manually the host name of the Exchange server
Mail clients such as Outlook and ActiveSync, will use the Exchange Autodiscover
services for locating the Exchange server name who will serve them. Regarding
OWA mail client, the difference is that the user will need to manually type the
URL address that includes the FQDN of the Exchange server name. In a scenario
of multiple Public faces Exchange site, OWA mail clients from regional Public
facing Exchange site can choose to use the “primary namespace” as the
Exchange server name or the “regional namespace” as the Exchange server
name. We will discuss this scenario in more details in the section OWA client
protocol connectivity flow in a multiple Public facing Exchange site environment
OWA Mail client – Specifying manually the
host name of the Exchange server
The main difference between the OWA client versus another Exchange mail client
such as Outlook or Mobile (ActiveSync) client is that, most of the time, OWA client
will manually type the URL address of the Exchange server instead getting the
name of the “Exchange server” from the Autodiscover process. In other words, the
OWA client needs to know their Exchange server name versus other Exchange
clients that use the Autodiscover process for “locating for them” the required
Exchange server name.
In case of that “regional OWA user” such as: OWA user whom his mailbox is located
on a “regional Exchange site” (Madrid site in our scenario), OWA user who needs to
access their mailbox, can use one of the following naming convention’s options for
the Exchange server host name:
1. Using the primary namespace – in our scenario, the “primary namespace” that
represents the “New York Public facing Exchange CAS” is: mail.o365info.com
In case that a “Madrid OWA user” use the primary namespace as the Exchange
server name (OWA URL), the “New York Public facing Exchange CAS” recognizes
that the user is a “Madrid OWA users” and redirect him to the “Madrid Public
facing Exchange CAS”.
2. Using the regional namespace – in a scenario of “Madrid OWA user”, the OWA
user can use the regional namespace as the Exchange server name (OWA URL).
Page 5 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007
coexistence environment | 3/4
Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015
For example: europe.mail.o365info.com. In this scenario, the OWA Madrid user
will access ”his Exchange server” directly.
Note – the scenario of: “regional OWA mail client” and the redirection process is not
unique or related only to Exchange 2007 OWA client, but instead, to any Exchange
OWA client that is involved in a scenario of multiple Public facing Exchange site and
regional namespace.
The special charters of Exchange 2007 OWA
Mail client in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence
environment
The process of serving Exchange 2007 OWA mail clients (Exchange users whom
their mailbox is hosted on Exchange 2007 Mailbox server), is different from the
“other mail protocols” because, Exchange 2013 “doesn’t know” how to proxy the
OWA mail client requests.
Instead, the Exchange CAS 2013 will redirect the “Exchange 2007 OWA mail clients”
to their Exchange 2007 CAS server.
This is the main reason for the using the “legacy namespace”. The “redirection
message”, that the Exchange 2013 CAS server will send to the “Exchange 2007 OWA
mail clients browser” includes the URL address of the Exchange 2007 CAS server
who will be able to “serve” the Exchange 2007 OWA mail client requests.
The URL that the Exchange 2013 CAS server provide includes the FQDN (the “legacy
namespace) that points to the Exchange 2007 CAS server.
Page 6 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007
coexistence environment | 3/4
Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015
The concept of silent redirection and SSO
In the former sections, we have a review two different scenarios in which the
Exchange 2013 CAS will redirect Exchange 2007 clients to their “destination
Exchange CAS server”.
The redirection method that is used by the Exchange 2013 CAS CU2, include two
major improvements that are related to the process of: redirecting OWA mail client.
The 2013 CAS CU2 Improvements are:
1. Silent redirect
2. SSO
Page 7 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007
coexistence environment | 3/4
Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015
Former version of Exchange CAS server and the OWA redirection method
Although the Exchange 2013 CU2 server version implements the “OWA redirection”
process in an improved way, it’s important to emphasize that the “OWA redirection
method”, is not a new Exchange method and that the OWA redirection method was
included in former versions of Exchange server (as far as I know since the Exchange
2007 server version).
In a former version of Exchange server, the OWA redirection method that was
implemented by the Exchange server for “redirecting OWA client” to their Exchange
server, could be described as “passive”.
The “OWA redirection” was implemented by displaying a “message window”, which
was sent by the Exchange server to the OWA client.
The “redirection information” was presented to the OWA user as a “click able link”.
I describe this method as: “passive redirection”, because the only responsibility of
the Exchange server was to display a message with the link to the OWA client.
The user’s responsibility is to:
 “Understand” that the link that was presented in the message, is the link to the
“right Exchange server”
 That he needs to click on the link that will redirect him to his Exchange CAS
server.
Additionally to the user requirement to “understand” that he needs to click on the
link, OWA users, had an experience that can be described as: ”double login”.
Page 8 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007
coexistence environment | 3/4
Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015
The meaning is that: OWA users, had to re provide their user credentials again, to
the “new destination Exchange server“ (the “destination” Exchange 2007 CAS).
Exchange 2013 CAS server version CU2 and the OWA redirection method
Exchange 2013 CAS server version CU2, includes two major features that
significantly improve the “Exchange OWA client” experience:
 A silent redirection (active redirection) – The Exchange 2013 CAS server knows
how to send a redirection “command” to the Exchange 2007 OWA browser, that
will redirect the OWA session to the “new URL address” (the legacy URL address
of the Exchange 2007 CAS server).
 SSO – Exchange 2013 CAS server knows how to “transfer” or “forward” (Proxy) the
OWA user credentials to the “destination” Exchange 2007 CAS server.
Page 9 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007
coexistence environment | 3/4
Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015
The method which Exchange CAS 2013 use for redirecting OWA client described as:
“silent” because, the OWA user is not involved throughout the process. The only
thing that the OWA user “see” is a short flush on his browsers (the redirection
process from the Exchange 2013 CAS OWA login page in the OWA login page from
the destination Exchange server).
The “Exchange 2007 OWA client” is not aware of the complicated redirection
process. From the “Exchange 2007 OWA client” point of view, this process is
transparent.
Note – although we mention the Exchange 2013 CAS method of: silent redirection +
SSO in the context of the Exchange 2007 OWA client, this method is implemented in
any type of Exchange OWA client in a scenario of multiple Public facing Exchange
sites.
Page 10 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007
coexistence environment | 3/4
Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015
Q1: How actually the OWA client silent redirection process is implemented?
A1: The “OWA redirection process”, is implemented by “cooperation” of the
Exchange CAS 2013 and the client browser. Exchange CAS 2013 sends an HTTP
redirection command that includes the “new URL address”. The client browser
accepts the redirection command and addresses the “destination URL address”
Page 11 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007
coexistence environment | 3/4
Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015
OWA connectivity flow | Exchange 2007 client
| Scenarios
Scenario 1: External 2007 OWA client | User mailbox located at the New York
site.
Scenario charters: an external Exchange 2007 OWA client, need to get access to his
mailbox.
 Exchange user type: Exchange 2007 client (Exchange user whom his mailbox is
hosted on the Exchange 2007 mailbox server).
 Exchange mailbox server location: the Exchange 2007 Mailbox server who hosts
the user mailbox, is located on the New York site.
 The New York site includes two public Exchange CAS servers: Exchange 2013 CAS
and Exchange 2007 CAS.
Page 12 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007
coexistence environment | 3/4
Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015
The OWA protocol connectivity flow, will be implemented as follows:
1. The “New York Exchange 2007 OWA client”, type the following URL
addresseshttps://mail.o365info.com/owa
The URL address that the OWA client use, includes the FQDN: mail.o365info.com
which points to the Public facing CAS2013 server in New York site (Number 1).
2. The external OWA client, provide his user credentials.
3. CAS2013 uses the user credentials and performs the Active Directory lookup.
CAS2013 determines that:
o The user mailbox version is: 2007
o That the local site include a Public facing Exchange 2007CAS server
o That the URL address of the Public facing Exchange 2007 CAS server is:
https://legacy.mail.o365info.com/owa
4. The Exchange CAS2013 will implement two different procedures:
1. Initiate silent redirect process – the “New York Public facing Exchange 2013”
sends a redirection command to the “external Exchange 2007 OWA client
browser” that includes the FQDN of the “Public facing Exchange 2007 CAS
server”: legacy.mail.o365info.com (Number 2).
2. Initiate SSO process – the “New York Public facing Exchange 2013”
implements the process of SSO, by forwarding (proxy) the Exchange 2007
OWA user credentials, to the “Public facing Exchange 2007 CAS server”
(Number 8).
5. The “external Exchange 2007 OWA mail client browser, “gets” the redirection
command from the CAS2013 and, starts a new HTTPS session with the ” Public
facing Exchange 2007 CAS server” (Number 3).
6. The Public facing Exchange 2007 CAS server (legacy.mail.o365info.com) will then
facilitate the request and retrieve the necessary data from the Exchange 2007
Mailbox server (Number 5).
7. The Exchange 2007 Mailbox server, provides the required user mailbox content
to the CAS2007 (Number 6).
8. The CAS2007 sends the information to the “external Exchange 2007 OWA client”
(Number 7).
Page 13 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007
coexistence environment | 3/4
Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015
Scenario 2: Exchange 2007 OWA client | User mailbox located at the Los
Angles site.
Scenario charters: an external Exchange 2007 Outlook client, need to access his
mailbox.
Note – To simplify the step’s description, we will relate only to the “external OWA
2007 client” but the same logic and flow are implemented also to the “internal OWA
client”.
 Exchange user type: Exchange 2007 client (Exchange user whom his mailbox is
hosted on the Exchange 2007 mailbox server).
Page 14 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007
coexistence environment | 3/4
Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015
 The Exchange 2007 user mailbox, is hosted on the Los Angles site (the Exchange
2007 Mailbox server located on the Los Angles site).
 The Exchange 2007 Mailbox server who hosts the user mailbox and the Public
facing Exchange 2013 CAS server are not at the same Active Directory site.
 The New York site, have a “local” Exchange 2007 CAS.
In this scenario, the same logic will be maintained. Exchange CAS 2013 server
redirects the Exchange 2007 OWA client to the Public facing Exchange 2007 CAS
server.
The “New York Public facing Exchange 2007 CAS server” authenticates the user,
performs an Active Directory lookup and determines that the user mailbox is
located at the Los Angles site.
 The “New York Public facing Exchange 2007 CAS server” will proxy the request to
the “internal Los Angles Exchange 2007 CAS server” (Number 3).
 Los Angles Exchange 2007 CAS server” will proxy the request to the “Los Angles
Exchange 2007 Mailbox server” (Number 4).
Page 15 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007
coexistence environment | 3/4
Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015
OWA client protocol connectivity flow in a
multiple Public facing Exchange site
environment
In the following section, we will review the OWA client protocol connectivity flow of
an external OWA Madrid user who tries to access his mailbox and use the primary
namespace as the URL address.
Page 16 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007
coexistence environment | 3/4
Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015
When the OWA Madrid user uses the primary namespace
(https://mail.o365info.com/owa), the Host name will be resolved to the IP address of
the “New York Public facing Exchange CAS server”.
When the “New York Public facing Exchange CAS server” recognizes that the user
considers as a “Madrid user” and that – this OWA client should access “his Public
facing Exchange CAS server”, the “New York Public facing Exchange CAS” will
implement a method which described as: silent redirection + SSO.
Note – the method of silent redirection and SSO is not related only to a scenario of
Exchange 2007 OWA client, but, to any other type of external OWA client such as
Exchange 2013 OWA clients.
The external OWA scenarios
In the next section, we will demonstrate OWA flow scenarios in which “OWA Madrid
user” (user that his mailbox is hosted at Madrid site will use the primary namespace
as the URL address: https://mail.o365info.com/owa
In the following diagram, we can see that the Exchange public infrastructure
includes two Public facing Exchange sites: the New York site and the Madrid site.
Each of the Exchange site has a Public facing Exchange CAS server.
 The public name of the “New York Public facing Exchange CAS”
is: mail.o365info.com
 The public name of the “Madrid Public facing Exchange CAS”
is: europe.mail.o365info.com
Page 17 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007
coexistence environment | 3/4
Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015
“Regional OWA users” (Madrid user in our scenario) can choose to use one of the
optional URL address.
The Madrid Public facing Exchange CAS server is represented by a dedicated
namespace (regional namespace): europe.mail.o365info.com
In case that external OWA Madrid user is familiar with the “Madrid regional
namespace”, he can use the URL address: https://europe.mail.o365info.com/owa
The additional option that the OWA Madrid user can use is: using the primary
namespace which will “lead him” to the “New York Public facing Exchange CAS”.
In this case the OWA Madrid user can use the URL
address: https://mail.o365info.com/owa
Page 18 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007
coexistence environment | 3/4
Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015
When the “New York Public facing Exchange CAS” gets the connection request from
the “OWA Madrid user”, he will implement a method was described as: “silent
redirection” which will redirect the OWA Madrid user, to “his Madrid Public facing
Exchange CAS server”.
Scenario 3: OWA client | User mailbox located on the Madrid site | Regional
namespace |destination site = Public facing
Scenario charters: an external Exchange OWA 2007 client, need to access his
mailbox.
Page 19 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007
coexistence environment | 3/4
Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015
 The Exchange 2007 user mailbox, is hosted on the Madrid site (the Exchange
2007 Mailbox server located on the Madrid site).
 The “Madrid Exchange site” considers as: Public facing Exchange site.
 The external OWA user uses the primary namespace as the URL address of the
Exchange server (https://mail.o365info.com/owa).
 The regional namespace that was “allocated” to the Madrid site
is: europe.mail.o365info.com
In the current scenario, an “OWA Madrid user” use the URL address:
https://mail.o365info.com/owa for access his mailbox.
The OWA protocol connectivity flow will be implemented as follows:
1. Madrid Exchange 2007 OWA client, type the following URL
addresseshttps://mail.o365info.com/owa
The FQDN: mail.o365info.com points to the “New York Public facing Exchange
CAS server” (Number 1).
2. The external OWA client, provide his user credentials.
3. CAS2013 uses the user credentials and performs the Active Directory lookup.
CAS2013 determines that:
o The user mailbox version is: 2007
o The Exchange 2007 mailbox server that host the user mailbox, is located at
the Madrid site
o The remote site (Madrid site) is a Public facing Exchange site
o That the “OWA address” of the “Madrid Public facing Exchange CAS server” is:
https://europe.mail.o365info.com/owa
4. The Exchange CAS2013 will implement two different procedures:
1. Initiate silent redirect process – the “New York Public facing Exchange 2013”
sends a redirection command to the “Madrid Exchange 2007 OWA client
browser” that includes the FQDN of the “Europe Exchange 2007 Public facing
Exchange CAS”: europe.mail.o365info.com (Number 2).
2. Initiate SSO process – the “New York Public facing Exchange 2013”
implements the process of SSO, by forwarding (proxy) the Exchange 2007
user credentials, to the “Europe Exchange 2007 Public facing Exchange CAS”
(Number 8).
5. The “Madrid Exchange 2007 OWA mail client browser, “gets” the redirection
command from the CAS2013 and, starts a new HTTPS session with the “Madrid
Exchange 2007 Public facing Exchange CAS” (Number 3).
Page 20 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007
coexistence environment | 3/4
Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015
6. The Madrid Exchange 2007 Public facing Exchange CAS
(europe.mail.o365info.com) will then facilitate the request and retrieve the
necessary data from the Exchange 2007 Mailbox server (Number 5).
7. The Madrid Exchange 2007 Mailbox server, provides the required user mailbox
content to the Madrid CAS2007 (Number 6).
8. The Madrid CAS2007 sends the information to the “external Exchange 2007 OWA
client” (Number7).
Additional reading
Proxying and Redirection
Page 21 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007
coexistence environment | 3/4
Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015
 Understanding Proxying and Redirection
 Exchange 2013 interoperability with legacy Exchange versions
OWA Cross-Site Silent Redirection
 OWA Cross-Site Silent Redirection in Exchange 2007 SP2
 Enabling Silent OWA Redirection for Office 365 Hybrid
 Enabling Silent OWA Redirection for Office 365 Hybrid
 Overview of Exchange Server 2007 CAS Proxying and Redirection
 Outlook Web Access and Exchange 2007, 2003 and 2000 coexistence
 Client Connectivity in an Exchange 2013 Coexistence Environment
 Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 Deployment and Coexistence
The Exchange 2013 coexistence article series index page

More Related Content

What's hot

Web Services (SOAP, WSDL, UDDI)
Web Services (SOAP, WSDL, UDDI)Web Services (SOAP, WSDL, UDDI)
Web Services (SOAP, WSDL, UDDI)Peter R. Egli
 
Java Web Services [2/5]: Introduction to SOAP
Java Web Services [2/5]: Introduction to SOAPJava Web Services [2/5]: Introduction to SOAP
Java Web Services [2/5]: Introduction to SOAPIMC Institute
 
SOAP, WSDL and UDDI
SOAP, WSDL and UDDISOAP, WSDL and UDDI
SOAP, WSDL and UDDIShahid Shaik
 
Introduction to Service Oriented Architectures, SOAP/WSDL Web Services and RE...
Introduction to Service Oriented Architectures, SOAP/WSDL Web Services and RE...Introduction to Service Oriented Architectures, SOAP/WSDL Web Services and RE...
Introduction to Service Oriented Architectures, SOAP/WSDL Web Services and RE...ecosio GmbH
 
Exchange 2013 coexistence and client protocol connectivity flow | The prefix ...
Exchange 2013 coexistence and client protocol connectivity flow | The prefix ...Exchange 2013 coexistence and client protocol connectivity flow | The prefix ...
Exchange 2013 coexistence and client protocol connectivity flow | The prefix ...Eyal Doron
 
Java Web Services [4/5]: Java API for XML Web Services
Java Web Services [4/5]: Java API for XML Web ServicesJava Web Services [4/5]: Java API for XML Web Services
Java Web Services [4/5]: Java API for XML Web ServicesIMC Institute
 
Introduction to SOAP/WSDL Web Services and RESTful Web Services
Introduction to SOAP/WSDL Web Services and RESTful Web ServicesIntroduction to SOAP/WSDL Web Services and RESTful Web Services
Introduction to SOAP/WSDL Web Services and RESTful Web Servicesecosio GmbH
 
SOAP, UDDI, WSDL. XML definitions
SOAP, UDDI, WSDL. XML definitions SOAP, UDDI, WSDL. XML definitions
SOAP, UDDI, WSDL. XML definitions Wish Mrt'xa
 
Java Web Services [1/5]: Introduction to Web Services
Java Web Services [1/5]: Introduction to Web ServicesJava Web Services [1/5]: Introduction to Web Services
Java Web Services [1/5]: Introduction to Web ServicesIMC Institute
 
Description of soa and SOAP,WSDL & UDDI
Description of soa and SOAP,WSDL & UDDIDescription of soa and SOAP,WSDL & UDDI
Description of soa and SOAP,WSDL & UDDITUSHAR VARSHNEY
 
The old exchange environment versus modern exchange environment part 02#36
The old exchange environment versus modern exchange environment  part 02#36The old exchange environment versus modern exchange environment  part 02#36
The old exchange environment versus modern exchange environment part 02#36Eyal Doron
 
Web services
Web servicesWeb services
Web servicesaspnet123
 

What's hot (20)

Web service architecture
Web service architectureWeb service architecture
Web service architecture
 
Web Services (SOAP, WSDL, UDDI)
Web Services (SOAP, WSDL, UDDI)Web Services (SOAP, WSDL, UDDI)
Web Services (SOAP, WSDL, UDDI)
 
Web Services
Web ServicesWeb Services
Web Services
 
Java Web Services [2/5]: Introduction to SOAP
Java Web Services [2/5]: Introduction to SOAPJava Web Services [2/5]: Introduction to SOAP
Java Web Services [2/5]: Introduction to SOAP
 
SOAP, WSDL and UDDI
SOAP, WSDL and UDDISOAP, WSDL and UDDI
SOAP, WSDL and UDDI
 
Introduction to Service Oriented Architectures, SOAP/WSDL Web Services and RE...
Introduction to Service Oriented Architectures, SOAP/WSDL Web Services and RE...Introduction to Service Oriented Architectures, SOAP/WSDL Web Services and RE...
Introduction to Service Oriented Architectures, SOAP/WSDL Web Services and RE...
 
Exchange 2013 coexistence and client protocol connectivity flow | The prefix ...
Exchange 2013 coexistence and client protocol connectivity flow | The prefix ...Exchange 2013 coexistence and client protocol connectivity flow | The prefix ...
Exchange 2013 coexistence and client protocol connectivity flow | The prefix ...
 
Wsdl
WsdlWsdl
Wsdl
 
Java Web Services [4/5]: Java API for XML Web Services
Java Web Services [4/5]: Java API for XML Web ServicesJava Web Services [4/5]: Java API for XML Web Services
Java Web Services [4/5]: Java API for XML Web Services
 
Exchange 2013 Migration & Coexistence
Exchange 2013 Migration & CoexistenceExchange 2013 Migration & Coexistence
Exchange 2013 Migration & Coexistence
 
Wcf faq
Wcf faqWcf faq
Wcf faq
 
Introduction to SOAP/WSDL Web Services and RESTful Web Services
Introduction to SOAP/WSDL Web Services and RESTful Web ServicesIntroduction to SOAP/WSDL Web Services and RESTful Web Services
Introduction to SOAP/WSDL Web Services and RESTful Web Services
 
SOAP, UDDI, WSDL. XML definitions
SOAP, UDDI, WSDL. XML definitions SOAP, UDDI, WSDL. XML definitions
SOAP, UDDI, WSDL. XML definitions
 
Wsdl
WsdlWsdl
Wsdl
 
Java Web Services [1/5]: Introduction to Web Services
Java Web Services [1/5]: Introduction to Web ServicesJava Web Services [1/5]: Introduction to Web Services
Java Web Services [1/5]: Introduction to Web Services
 
Description of soa and SOAP,WSDL & UDDI
Description of soa and SOAP,WSDL & UDDIDescription of soa and SOAP,WSDL & UDDI
Description of soa and SOAP,WSDL & UDDI
 
Web Service Basics and NWS Setup
Web Service  Basics and NWS SetupWeb Service  Basics and NWS Setup
Web Service Basics and NWS Setup
 
The old exchange environment versus modern exchange environment part 02#36
The old exchange environment versus modern exchange environment  part 02#36The old exchange environment versus modern exchange environment  part 02#36
The old exchange environment versus modern exchange environment part 02#36
 
Web services
Web servicesWeb services
Web services
 
Exchange Server 2013 Architecture Deep Dive, Part 1
Exchange Server 2013 Architecture Deep Dive, Part 1Exchange Server 2013 Architecture Deep Dive, Part 1
Exchange Server 2013 Architecture Deep Dive, Part 1
 

Viewers also liked

My dear beloved son
My dear beloved sonMy dear beloved son
My dear beloved sonMohd Habib
 
Exchange clients and their public facing exchange server part 13#36
Exchange clients and their public facing exchange server  part 13#36Exchange clients and their public facing exchange server  part 13#36
Exchange clients and their public facing exchange server part 13#36Eyal Doron
 
PATHS Evaluation of the 1st paths prototype
PATHS Evaluation of the 1st paths prototypePATHS Evaluation of the 1st paths prototype
PATHS Evaluation of the 1st paths prototypepathsproject
 
Exchange infrastructure implementing single domain namespace scheme part 2#...
Exchange infrastructure  implementing single domain namespace scheme  part 2#...Exchange infrastructure  implementing single domain namespace scheme  part 2#...
Exchange infrastructure implementing single domain namespace scheme part 2#...Eyal Doron
 
Outlook autodiscover decision process choosing the right autodiscover method ...
Outlook autodiscover decision process choosing the right autodiscover method ...Outlook autodiscover decision process choosing the right autodiscover method ...
Outlook autodiscover decision process choosing the right autodiscover method ...Eyal Doron
 
Outlook test e mail auto configuration autodiscover troubleshooting tools p...
Outlook test e mail auto configuration  autodiscover troubleshooting tools  p...Outlook test e mail auto configuration  autodiscover troubleshooting tools  p...
Outlook test e mail auto configuration autodiscover troubleshooting tools p...Eyal Doron
 
IND-2012-254 Vivekanand M S, Mathalamparai -Don’t waste drinking water
IND-2012-254 Vivekanand M S, Mathalamparai -Don’t waste drinking waterIND-2012-254 Vivekanand M S, Mathalamparai -Don’t waste drinking water
IND-2012-254 Vivekanand M S, Mathalamparai -Don’t waste drinking waterdesignforchangechallenge
 
Comparing taxonomies for organising collections of documents presentation
Comparing taxonomies for organising collections of documents presentationComparing taxonomies for organising collections of documents presentation
Comparing taxonomies for organising collections of documents presentationpathsproject
 
Aletras, Nikolaos and Stevenson, Mark (2013) "Evaluating Topic Coherence Us...
Aletras, Nikolaos  and  Stevenson, Mark (2013) "Evaluating Topic Coherence Us...Aletras, Nikolaos  and  Stevenson, Mark (2013) "Evaluating Topic Coherence Us...
Aletras, Nikolaos and Stevenson, Mark (2013) "Evaluating Topic Coherence Us...pathsproject
 
Should i use a single namespace for exchange infrastructure part 1#2 part ...
Should i use a single namespace for exchange infrastructure   part 1#2  part ...Should i use a single namespace for exchange infrastructure   part 1#2  part ...
Should i use a single namespace for exchange infrastructure part 1#2 part ...Eyal Doron
 
Recommendations for the automatic enrichment of digital library content using...
Recommendations for the automatic enrichment of digital library content using...Recommendations for the automatic enrichment of digital library content using...
Recommendations for the automatic enrichment of digital library content using...pathsproject
 
Why our mail system is exposed to spoof and phishing mail attacks part 5#9 |...
Why our mail system is exposed to spoof and phishing mail attacks  part 5#9 |...Why our mail system is exposed to spoof and phishing mail attacks  part 5#9 |...
Why our mail system is exposed to spoof and phishing mail attacks part 5#9 |...Eyal Doron
 
PATHS state of the art monitoring report
PATHS state of the art monitoring reportPATHS state of the art monitoring report
PATHS state of the art monitoring reportpathsproject
 
IND-2012-317 Govt Satya Bharti Adarsh Sr Sec School, Chogawan -Paudha Lagao, ...
IND-2012-317 Govt Satya Bharti Adarsh Sr Sec School, Chogawan -Paudha Lagao, ...IND-2012-317 Govt Satya Bharti Adarsh Sr Sec School, Chogawan -Paudha Lagao, ...
IND-2012-317 Govt Satya Bharti Adarsh Sr Sec School, Chogawan -Paudha Lagao, ...designforchangechallenge
 
A pilot on Semantic Textual Similarity
A pilot on Semantic Textual SimilarityA pilot on Semantic Textual Similarity
A pilot on Semantic Textual Similaritypathsproject
 

Viewers also liked (18)

My dear beloved son
My dear beloved sonMy dear beloved son
My dear beloved son
 
Exchange clients and their public facing exchange server part 13#36
Exchange clients and their public facing exchange server  part 13#36Exchange clients and their public facing exchange server  part 13#36
Exchange clients and their public facing exchange server part 13#36
 
PATHS Evaluation of the 1st paths prototype
PATHS Evaluation of the 1st paths prototypePATHS Evaluation of the 1st paths prototype
PATHS Evaluation of the 1st paths prototype
 
Exchange infrastructure implementing single domain namespace scheme part 2#...
Exchange infrastructure  implementing single domain namespace scheme  part 2#...Exchange infrastructure  implementing single domain namespace scheme  part 2#...
Exchange infrastructure implementing single domain namespace scheme part 2#...
 
Outlook autodiscover decision process choosing the right autodiscover method ...
Outlook autodiscover decision process choosing the right autodiscover method ...Outlook autodiscover decision process choosing the right autodiscover method ...
Outlook autodiscover decision process choosing the right autodiscover method ...
 
Outlook test e mail auto configuration autodiscover troubleshooting tools p...
Outlook test e mail auto configuration  autodiscover troubleshooting tools  p...Outlook test e mail auto configuration  autodiscover troubleshooting tools  p...
Outlook test e mail auto configuration autodiscover troubleshooting tools p...
 
IND-2012-254 Vivekanand M S, Mathalamparai -Don’t waste drinking water
IND-2012-254 Vivekanand M S, Mathalamparai -Don’t waste drinking waterIND-2012-254 Vivekanand M S, Mathalamparai -Don’t waste drinking water
IND-2012-254 Vivekanand M S, Mathalamparai -Don’t waste drinking water
 
Ana clara
Ana claraAna clara
Ana clara
 
TAM-2012-11 PUMS Pandiapuram
TAM-2012-11 PUMS PandiapuramTAM-2012-11 PUMS Pandiapuram
TAM-2012-11 PUMS Pandiapuram
 
Comparing taxonomies for organising collections of documents presentation
Comparing taxonomies for organising collections of documents presentationComparing taxonomies for organising collections of documents presentation
Comparing taxonomies for organising collections of documents presentation
 
Aletras, Nikolaos and Stevenson, Mark (2013) "Evaluating Topic Coherence Us...
Aletras, Nikolaos  and  Stevenson, Mark (2013) "Evaluating Topic Coherence Us...Aletras, Nikolaos  and  Stevenson, Mark (2013) "Evaluating Topic Coherence Us...
Aletras, Nikolaos and Stevenson, Mark (2013) "Evaluating Topic Coherence Us...
 
Fichas s
Fichas sFichas s
Fichas s
 
Should i use a single namespace for exchange infrastructure part 1#2 part ...
Should i use a single namespace for exchange infrastructure   part 1#2  part ...Should i use a single namespace for exchange infrastructure   part 1#2  part ...
Should i use a single namespace for exchange infrastructure part 1#2 part ...
 
Recommendations for the automatic enrichment of digital library content using...
Recommendations for the automatic enrichment of digital library content using...Recommendations for the automatic enrichment of digital library content using...
Recommendations for the automatic enrichment of digital library content using...
 
Why our mail system is exposed to spoof and phishing mail attacks part 5#9 |...
Why our mail system is exposed to spoof and phishing mail attacks  part 5#9 |...Why our mail system is exposed to spoof and phishing mail attacks  part 5#9 |...
Why our mail system is exposed to spoof and phishing mail attacks part 5#9 |...
 
PATHS state of the art monitoring report
PATHS state of the art monitoring reportPATHS state of the art monitoring report
PATHS state of the art monitoring report
 
IND-2012-317 Govt Satya Bharti Adarsh Sr Sec School, Chogawan -Paudha Lagao, ...
IND-2012-317 Govt Satya Bharti Adarsh Sr Sec School, Chogawan -Paudha Lagao, ...IND-2012-317 Govt Satya Bharti Adarsh Sr Sec School, Chogawan -Paudha Lagao, ...
IND-2012-317 Govt Satya Bharti Adarsh Sr Sec School, Chogawan -Paudha Lagao, ...
 
A pilot on Semantic Textual Similarity
A pilot on Semantic Textual SimilarityA pilot on Semantic Textual Similarity
A pilot on Semantic Textual Similarity
 

Similar to OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence | 3/4 |18#23

Exchange 2013 coexistence environment and the Exchange legacy infrastructure ...
Exchange 2013 coexistence environment and the Exchange legacy infrastructure ...Exchange 2013 coexistence environment and the Exchange legacy infrastructure ...
Exchange 2013 coexistence environment and the Exchange legacy infrastructure ...Eyal Doron
 
Exchange CAS server | Proxy versus redirection | 4#23
Exchange CAS server | Proxy versus redirection | 4#23Exchange CAS server | Proxy versus redirection | 4#23
Exchange CAS server | Proxy versus redirection | 4#23Eyal Doron
 
The importance of Exchange 2013 CAS in Exchange 2013 coexistence | Part 2/2 |...
The importance of Exchange 2013 CAS in Exchange 2013 coexistence | Part 2/2 |...The importance of Exchange 2013 CAS in Exchange 2013 coexistence | Part 2/2 |...
The importance of Exchange 2013 CAS in Exchange 2013 coexistence | Part 2/2 |...Eyal Doron
 
Client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2010 coexistence | Introdu...
Client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2010 coexistence | Introdu...Client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2010 coexistence | Introdu...
Client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2010 coexistence | Introdu...Eyal Doron
 
The importance of Exchange 2013 CAS in Exchange 2013 coexistence | Part 1/2 |...
The importance of Exchange 2013 CAS in Exchange 2013 coexistence | Part 1/2 |...The importance of Exchange 2013 CAS in Exchange 2013 coexistence | Part 1/2 |...
The importance of Exchange 2013 CAS in Exchange 2013 coexistence | Part 1/2 |...Eyal Doron
 
My E-mail appears as spam - Troubleshooting path | Part 11#17
My E-mail appears as spam - Troubleshooting path | Part 11#17My E-mail appears as spam - Troubleshooting path | Part 11#17
My E-mail appears as spam - Troubleshooting path | Part 11#17Eyal Doron
 
Exchange 2013 coexistence | Autodiscover infrastructure | Part 2/2 | 12#23
Exchange 2013 coexistence | Autodiscover infrastructure | Part 2/2 | 12#23Exchange 2013 coexistence | Autodiscover infrastructure | Part 2/2 | 12#23
Exchange 2013 coexistence | Autodiscover infrastructure | Part 2/2 | 12#23Eyal Doron
 
The checklist for preparing your Exchange 2007 infrastructure for Exchange 20...
The checklist for preparing your Exchange 2007 infrastructure for Exchange 20...The checklist for preparing your Exchange 2007 infrastructure for Exchange 20...
The checklist for preparing your Exchange 2007 infrastructure for Exchange 20...Eyal Doron
 
Exchange 2013 Architecture Details
Exchange 2013 Architecture DetailsExchange 2013 Architecture Details
Exchange 2013 Architecture DetailsHuy Phạm
 
Microsoft Exchange 2013 deployment and coexistence
Microsoft Exchange 2013 deployment and coexistenceMicrosoft Exchange 2013 deployment and coexistence
Microsoft Exchange 2013 deployment and coexistenceMotty Ben Atia
 
The checklist for preparing your Exchange 2010 infrastructure for Exchange 20...
The checklist for preparing your Exchange 2010 infrastructure for Exchange 20...The checklist for preparing your Exchange 2010 infrastructure for Exchange 20...
The checklist for preparing your Exchange 2010 infrastructure for Exchange 20...Eyal Doron
 
Overview of Microsoft Exchange Server
Overview of Microsoft Exchange ServerOverview of Microsoft Exchange Server
Overview of Microsoft Exchange Serverbedekarpm
 
A Brief History of Microsoft Exchange Server
A Brief History of Microsoft Exchange ServerA Brief History of Microsoft Exchange Server
A Brief History of Microsoft Exchange Serverbedekarpm
 
How a network connection is created A network connection is initi.pdf
How a network connection is created A network connection is initi.pdfHow a network connection is created A network connection is initi.pdf
How a network connection is created A network connection is initi.pdfarccreation001
 
New Exchange Server 2013 Architecture
New Exchange Server 2013 ArchitectureNew Exchange Server 2013 Architecture
New Exchange Server 2013 ArchitectureKhalid Al-Ghamdi
 
Exchange 2003 / 2010 Notes from the Field
Exchange 2003 / 2010 Notes from the FieldExchange 2003 / 2010 Notes from the Field
Exchange 2003 / 2010 Notes from the FieldDave Kawula
 
Jax ws
Jax wsJax ws
Jax wsF K
 
SoCal User Group Meeting 2013-05-06
SoCal User Group Meeting 2013-05-06SoCal User Group Meeting 2013-05-06
SoCal User Group Meeting 2013-05-06Thomas Stensitzki
 

Similar to OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence | 3/4 |18#23 (20)

Exchange 2013 coexistence environment and the Exchange legacy infrastructure ...
Exchange 2013 coexistence environment and the Exchange legacy infrastructure ...Exchange 2013 coexistence environment and the Exchange legacy infrastructure ...
Exchange 2013 coexistence environment and the Exchange legacy infrastructure ...
 
Exchange CAS server | Proxy versus redirection | 4#23
Exchange CAS server | Proxy versus redirection | 4#23Exchange CAS server | Proxy versus redirection | 4#23
Exchange CAS server | Proxy versus redirection | 4#23
 
The importance of Exchange 2013 CAS in Exchange 2013 coexistence | Part 2/2 |...
The importance of Exchange 2013 CAS in Exchange 2013 coexistence | Part 2/2 |...The importance of Exchange 2013 CAS in Exchange 2013 coexistence | Part 2/2 |...
The importance of Exchange 2013 CAS in Exchange 2013 coexistence | Part 2/2 |...
 
Client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2010 coexistence | Introdu...
Client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2010 coexistence | Introdu...Client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2010 coexistence | Introdu...
Client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2010 coexistence | Introdu...
 
The importance of Exchange 2013 CAS in Exchange 2013 coexistence | Part 1/2 |...
The importance of Exchange 2013 CAS in Exchange 2013 coexistence | Part 1/2 |...The importance of Exchange 2013 CAS in Exchange 2013 coexistence | Part 1/2 |...
The importance of Exchange 2013 CAS in Exchange 2013 coexistence | Part 1/2 |...
 
My E-mail appears as spam - Troubleshooting path | Part 11#17
My E-mail appears as spam - Troubleshooting path | Part 11#17My E-mail appears as spam - Troubleshooting path | Part 11#17
My E-mail appears as spam - Troubleshooting path | Part 11#17
 
Exchange 2013 coexistence | Autodiscover infrastructure | Part 2/2 | 12#23
Exchange 2013 coexistence | Autodiscover infrastructure | Part 2/2 | 12#23Exchange 2013 coexistence | Autodiscover infrastructure | Part 2/2 | 12#23
Exchange 2013 coexistence | Autodiscover infrastructure | Part 2/2 | 12#23
 
Exchange server 2013
Exchange server 2013Exchange server 2013
Exchange server 2013
 
The checklist for preparing your Exchange 2007 infrastructure for Exchange 20...
The checklist for preparing your Exchange 2007 infrastructure for Exchange 20...The checklist for preparing your Exchange 2007 infrastructure for Exchange 20...
The checklist for preparing your Exchange 2007 infrastructure for Exchange 20...
 
Exchange 2013 Architecture Details
Exchange 2013 Architecture DetailsExchange 2013 Architecture Details
Exchange 2013 Architecture Details
 
Microsoft Exchange 2013 deployment and coexistence
Microsoft Exchange 2013 deployment and coexistenceMicrosoft Exchange 2013 deployment and coexistence
Microsoft Exchange 2013 deployment and coexistence
 
The checklist for preparing your Exchange 2010 infrastructure for Exchange 20...
The checklist for preparing your Exchange 2010 infrastructure for Exchange 20...The checklist for preparing your Exchange 2010 infrastructure for Exchange 20...
The checklist for preparing your Exchange 2010 infrastructure for Exchange 20...
 
Overview of Microsoft Exchange Server
Overview of Microsoft Exchange ServerOverview of Microsoft Exchange Server
Overview of Microsoft Exchange Server
 
A Brief History of Microsoft Exchange Server
A Brief History of Microsoft Exchange ServerA Brief History of Microsoft Exchange Server
A Brief History of Microsoft Exchange Server
 
How a network connection is created A network connection is initi.pdf
How a network connection is created A network connection is initi.pdfHow a network connection is created A network connection is initi.pdf
How a network connection is created A network connection is initi.pdf
 
New Exchange Server 2013 Architecture
New Exchange Server 2013 ArchitectureNew Exchange Server 2013 Architecture
New Exchange Server 2013 Architecture
 
Exchange 2003 / 2010 Notes from the Field
Exchange 2003 / 2010 Notes from the FieldExchange 2003 / 2010 Notes from the Field
Exchange 2003 / 2010 Notes from the Field
 
Jax ws
Jax wsJax ws
Jax ws
 
SoCal User Group Meeting 2013-05-06
SoCal User Group Meeting 2013-05-06SoCal User Group Meeting 2013-05-06
SoCal User Group Meeting 2013-05-06
 
Ch03 cas
Ch03 casCh03 cas
Ch03 cas
 

More from Eyal Doron

How to simulate spoof e mail attack and bypass spf sender verification - 2#2
How to simulate spoof e mail attack and bypass spf sender verification - 2#2How to simulate spoof e mail attack and bypass spf sender verification - 2#2
How to simulate spoof e mail attack and bypass spf sender verification - 2#2Eyal Doron
 
How does sender verification work how we identify spoof mail) spf, dkim dmar...
How does sender verification work  how we identify spoof mail) spf, dkim dmar...How does sender verification work  how we identify spoof mail) spf, dkim dmar...
How does sender verification work how we identify spoof mail) spf, dkim dmar...Eyal Doron
 
Dealing with the threat of spoof and phishing mail attacks part 6#9 | Eyal ...
Dealing with the threat of spoof and phishing mail attacks   part 6#9 | Eyal ...Dealing with the threat of spoof and phishing mail attacks   part 6#9 | Eyal ...
Dealing with the threat of spoof and phishing mail attacks part 6#9 | Eyal ...Eyal Doron
 
What is the meaning of mail phishing attack in simple words part 4#9 | Eyal...
What is the meaning of mail phishing attack in simple words   part 4#9 | Eyal...What is the meaning of mail phishing attack in simple words   part 4#9 | Eyal...
What is the meaning of mail phishing attack in simple words part 4#9 | Eyal...Eyal Doron
 
What is so special about spoof mail attack part 3#9 | Eyal Doron | o365info.com
What is so special about spoof mail attack  part 3#9 | Eyal Doron | o365info.comWhat is so special about spoof mail attack  part 3#9 | Eyal Doron | o365info.com
What is so special about spoof mail attack part 3#9 | Eyal Doron | o365info.comEyal Doron
 
What are the possible damages of phishing and spoofing mail attacks part 2#...
What are the possible damages of phishing and spoofing mail attacks   part 2#...What are the possible damages of phishing and spoofing mail attacks   part 2#...
What are the possible damages of phishing and spoofing mail attacks part 2#...Eyal Doron
 
Dealing with a spoof mail attacks and phishing mail attacks a little story ...
Dealing with a spoof mail attacks and phishing mail attacks   a little story ...Dealing with a spoof mail attacks and phishing mail attacks   a little story ...
Dealing with a spoof mail attacks and phishing mail attacks a little story ...Eyal Doron
 
Exchange In-Place eDiscovery & Hold | Introduction | 5#7
Exchange In-Place eDiscovery & Hold | Introduction  | 5#7Exchange In-Place eDiscovery & Hold | Introduction  | 5#7
Exchange In-Place eDiscovery & Hold | Introduction | 5#7Eyal Doron
 
Mail migration to office 365 measure and estimate mail migration throughput...
Mail migration to office 365   measure and estimate mail migration throughput...Mail migration to office 365   measure and estimate mail migration throughput...
Mail migration to office 365 measure and estimate mail migration throughput...Eyal Doron
 
Mail migration to office 365 factors that impact mail migration performance...
Mail migration to office 365   factors that impact mail migration performance...Mail migration to office 365   factors that impact mail migration performance...
Mail migration to office 365 factors that impact mail migration performance...Eyal Doron
 
Mail migration to office 365 optimizing the mail migration throughput - par...
Mail migration to office 365   optimizing the mail migration throughput - par...Mail migration to office 365   optimizing the mail migration throughput - par...
Mail migration to office 365 optimizing the mail migration throughput - par...Eyal Doron
 
Mail migration to office 365 mail migration methods - part 1#4
Mail migration to office 365   mail migration methods - part 1#4Mail migration to office 365   mail migration methods - part 1#4
Mail migration to office 365 mail migration methods - part 1#4Eyal Doron
 
Smtp relay in office 365 environment troubleshooting scenarios - part 4#4
Smtp relay in office 365 environment   troubleshooting scenarios - part 4#4Smtp relay in office 365 environment   troubleshooting scenarios - part 4#4
Smtp relay in office 365 environment troubleshooting scenarios - part 4#4Eyal Doron
 
Stage migration, exchange and autodiscover infrastructure part 1#2 part 35#36
Stage migration, exchange and autodiscover infrastructure  part 1#2  part 35#36Stage migration, exchange and autodiscover infrastructure  part 1#2  part 35#36
Stage migration, exchange and autodiscover infrastructure part 1#2 part 35#36Eyal Doron
 
Autodiscover flow in an office 365 environment part 3#3 part 31#36
Autodiscover flow in an office 365 environment  part 3#3  part 31#36Autodiscover flow in an office 365 environment  part 3#3  part 31#36
Autodiscover flow in an office 365 environment part 3#3 part 31#36Eyal Doron
 
Autodiscover flow in an exchange hybrid environment part 1#3 part 32#36
Autodiscover flow in an exchange hybrid environment  part 1#3  part 32#36Autodiscover flow in an exchange hybrid environment  part 1#3  part 32#36
Autodiscover flow in an exchange hybrid environment part 1#3 part 32#36Eyal Doron
 
Autodiscover flow in an exchange on premises environment non-active director...
Autodiscover flow in an exchange on premises environment  non-active director...Autodiscover flow in an exchange on premises environment  non-active director...
Autodiscover flow in an exchange on premises environment non-active director...Eyal Doron
 
Autodiscover flow in an exchange on premises environment non-active director...
Autodiscover flow in an exchange on premises environment  non-active director...Autodiscover flow in an exchange on premises environment  non-active director...
Autodiscover flow in an exchange on premises environment non-active director...Eyal Doron
 
Autodiscover flow in an exchange on premises environment non-active director...
Autodiscover flow in an exchange on premises environment  non-active director...Autodiscover flow in an exchange on premises environment  non-active director...
Autodiscover flow in an exchange on premises environment non-active director...Eyal Doron
 
Outlook test e mail auto configuration autodiscover troubleshooting tools p...
Outlook test e mail auto configuration  autodiscover troubleshooting tools  p...Outlook test e mail auto configuration  autodiscover troubleshooting tools  p...
Outlook test e mail auto configuration autodiscover troubleshooting tools p...Eyal Doron
 

More from Eyal Doron (20)

How to simulate spoof e mail attack and bypass spf sender verification - 2#2
How to simulate spoof e mail attack and bypass spf sender verification - 2#2How to simulate spoof e mail attack and bypass spf sender verification - 2#2
How to simulate spoof e mail attack and bypass spf sender verification - 2#2
 
How does sender verification work how we identify spoof mail) spf, dkim dmar...
How does sender verification work  how we identify spoof mail) spf, dkim dmar...How does sender verification work  how we identify spoof mail) spf, dkim dmar...
How does sender verification work how we identify spoof mail) spf, dkim dmar...
 
Dealing with the threat of spoof and phishing mail attacks part 6#9 | Eyal ...
Dealing with the threat of spoof and phishing mail attacks   part 6#9 | Eyal ...Dealing with the threat of spoof and phishing mail attacks   part 6#9 | Eyal ...
Dealing with the threat of spoof and phishing mail attacks part 6#9 | Eyal ...
 
What is the meaning of mail phishing attack in simple words part 4#9 | Eyal...
What is the meaning of mail phishing attack in simple words   part 4#9 | Eyal...What is the meaning of mail phishing attack in simple words   part 4#9 | Eyal...
What is the meaning of mail phishing attack in simple words part 4#9 | Eyal...
 
What is so special about spoof mail attack part 3#9 | Eyal Doron | o365info.com
What is so special about spoof mail attack  part 3#9 | Eyal Doron | o365info.comWhat is so special about spoof mail attack  part 3#9 | Eyal Doron | o365info.com
What is so special about spoof mail attack part 3#9 | Eyal Doron | o365info.com
 
What are the possible damages of phishing and spoofing mail attacks part 2#...
What are the possible damages of phishing and spoofing mail attacks   part 2#...What are the possible damages of phishing and spoofing mail attacks   part 2#...
What are the possible damages of phishing and spoofing mail attacks part 2#...
 
Dealing with a spoof mail attacks and phishing mail attacks a little story ...
Dealing with a spoof mail attacks and phishing mail attacks   a little story ...Dealing with a spoof mail attacks and phishing mail attacks   a little story ...
Dealing with a spoof mail attacks and phishing mail attacks a little story ...
 
Exchange In-Place eDiscovery & Hold | Introduction | 5#7
Exchange In-Place eDiscovery & Hold | Introduction  | 5#7Exchange In-Place eDiscovery & Hold | Introduction  | 5#7
Exchange In-Place eDiscovery & Hold | Introduction | 5#7
 
Mail migration to office 365 measure and estimate mail migration throughput...
Mail migration to office 365   measure and estimate mail migration throughput...Mail migration to office 365   measure and estimate mail migration throughput...
Mail migration to office 365 measure and estimate mail migration throughput...
 
Mail migration to office 365 factors that impact mail migration performance...
Mail migration to office 365   factors that impact mail migration performance...Mail migration to office 365   factors that impact mail migration performance...
Mail migration to office 365 factors that impact mail migration performance...
 
Mail migration to office 365 optimizing the mail migration throughput - par...
Mail migration to office 365   optimizing the mail migration throughput - par...Mail migration to office 365   optimizing the mail migration throughput - par...
Mail migration to office 365 optimizing the mail migration throughput - par...
 
Mail migration to office 365 mail migration methods - part 1#4
Mail migration to office 365   mail migration methods - part 1#4Mail migration to office 365   mail migration methods - part 1#4
Mail migration to office 365 mail migration methods - part 1#4
 
Smtp relay in office 365 environment troubleshooting scenarios - part 4#4
Smtp relay in office 365 environment   troubleshooting scenarios - part 4#4Smtp relay in office 365 environment   troubleshooting scenarios - part 4#4
Smtp relay in office 365 environment troubleshooting scenarios - part 4#4
 
Stage migration, exchange and autodiscover infrastructure part 1#2 part 35#36
Stage migration, exchange and autodiscover infrastructure  part 1#2  part 35#36Stage migration, exchange and autodiscover infrastructure  part 1#2  part 35#36
Stage migration, exchange and autodiscover infrastructure part 1#2 part 35#36
 
Autodiscover flow in an office 365 environment part 3#3 part 31#36
Autodiscover flow in an office 365 environment  part 3#3  part 31#36Autodiscover flow in an office 365 environment  part 3#3  part 31#36
Autodiscover flow in an office 365 environment part 3#3 part 31#36
 
Autodiscover flow in an exchange hybrid environment part 1#3 part 32#36
Autodiscover flow in an exchange hybrid environment  part 1#3  part 32#36Autodiscover flow in an exchange hybrid environment  part 1#3  part 32#36
Autodiscover flow in an exchange hybrid environment part 1#3 part 32#36
 
Autodiscover flow in an exchange on premises environment non-active director...
Autodiscover flow in an exchange on premises environment  non-active director...Autodiscover flow in an exchange on premises environment  non-active director...
Autodiscover flow in an exchange on premises environment non-active director...
 
Autodiscover flow in an exchange on premises environment non-active director...
Autodiscover flow in an exchange on premises environment  non-active director...Autodiscover flow in an exchange on premises environment  non-active director...
Autodiscover flow in an exchange on premises environment non-active director...
 
Autodiscover flow in an exchange on premises environment non-active director...
Autodiscover flow in an exchange on premises environment  non-active director...Autodiscover flow in an exchange on premises environment  non-active director...
Autodiscover flow in an exchange on premises environment non-active director...
 
Outlook test e mail auto configuration autodiscover troubleshooting tools p...
Outlook test e mail auto configuration  autodiscover troubleshooting tools  p...Outlook test e mail auto configuration  autodiscover troubleshooting tools  p...
Outlook test e mail auto configuration autodiscover troubleshooting tools p...
 

Recently uploaded

Factors to Consider When Choosing Accounts Payable Services Providers.pptx
Factors to Consider When Choosing Accounts Payable Services Providers.pptxFactors to Consider When Choosing Accounts Payable Services Providers.pptx
Factors to Consider When Choosing Accounts Payable Services Providers.pptxKatpro Technologies
 
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...Miguel Araújo
 
The Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptx
The Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptxThe Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptx
The Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptxMalak Abu Hammad
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking MenDelhi Call girls
 
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slideHistor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slidevu2urc
 
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerHow to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerThousandEyes
 
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps ScriptAutomating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Scriptwesley chun
 
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure serviceWhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure servicePooja Nehwal
 
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024Rafal Los
 
Top 5 Benefits OF Using Muvi Live Paywall For Live Streams
Top 5 Benefits OF Using Muvi Live Paywall For Live StreamsTop 5 Benefits OF Using Muvi Live Paywall For Live Streams
Top 5 Benefits OF Using Muvi Live Paywall For Live StreamsRoshan Dwivedi
 
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)Allon Mureinik
 
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine KG and Vector search for enhanced R...
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine  KG and Vector search for  enhanced R...Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine  KG and Vector search for  enhanced R...
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine KG and Vector search for enhanced R...Neo4j
 
IAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI Solutions
IAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI SolutionsIAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI Solutions
IAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI SolutionsEnterprise Knowledge
 
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path MountBreaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path MountPuma Security, LLC
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking MenDelhi Call girls
 
A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024
A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024
A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024Results
 
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed textsHandwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed textsMaria Levchenko
 
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...Martijn de Jong
 
Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024The Digital Insurer
 
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)Gabriella Davis
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Factors to Consider When Choosing Accounts Payable Services Providers.pptx
Factors to Consider When Choosing Accounts Payable Services Providers.pptxFactors to Consider When Choosing Accounts Payable Services Providers.pptx
Factors to Consider When Choosing Accounts Payable Services Providers.pptx
 
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
 
The Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptx
The Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptxThe Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptx
The Codex of Business Writing Software for Real-World Solutions 2.pptx
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men
 
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slideHistor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
 
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerHow to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
 
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps ScriptAutomating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
 
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure serviceWhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
 
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
 
Top 5 Benefits OF Using Muvi Live Paywall For Live Streams
Top 5 Benefits OF Using Muvi Live Paywall For Live StreamsTop 5 Benefits OF Using Muvi Live Paywall For Live Streams
Top 5 Benefits OF Using Muvi Live Paywall For Live Streams
 
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
 
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine KG and Vector search for enhanced R...
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine  KG and Vector search for  enhanced R...Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine  KG and Vector search for  enhanced R...
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine KG and Vector search for enhanced R...
 
IAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI Solutions
IAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI SolutionsIAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI Solutions
IAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI Solutions
 
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path MountBreaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
 
A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024
A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024
A Call to Action for Generative AI in 2024
 
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed textsHandwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
 
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
 
Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
Finology Group – Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
 
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
 

OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence | 3/4 |18#23

  • 1. Page 1 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment | 3/4 Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015 OWA CLIENT PROTOCOL CONNECTIVITY FLOW IN EXCHANGE 2013/2007 COEXISTENCE ENVIRONMENT | 3/4 | PART 18#23 The current article, is the third article of four articles series, on the subject of: “Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment and mail client protocol connectivity flow”. In this article, we will review the client protocol connectivity flow of: OWA Exchange 2007 clients in an Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment.
  • 2. Page 2 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment | 3/4 Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015 The current section, is dedicated to the description of the OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment. When reading the description of the different OWA client protocol connectivity scenarios and the details of each scenario, you might experience a slight headache. It’s ok, despite the risk of the “slight headache”, I think that it’s worth putting in the effort, to be able to understand the concept and the logic of the OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment.
  • 3. Page 3 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment | 3/4 Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015 Two main characteristics of the OWA mail client that Differentiate him from other Exchange clients The client protocol connectivity flow of OWA mail client has two main characteristics that are different from another mail client such as: Outlook or ActiveSync mail clients. 1. Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment Compared to most of the client protocol connectivity flow in which the Exchange CAS 2013 Proxy mail client request to their “legacy Exchange CAS server”, in a scenario of the Exchange 2007 OWA client, Exchange CAS 2013 will not Proxy the 2007 OWA client connection request but instead, send a redirection command to the 2007 OWA client.
  • 4. Page 4 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment | 3/4 Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015 2. Specifying manually the host name of the Exchange server Mail clients such as Outlook and ActiveSync, will use the Exchange Autodiscover services for locating the Exchange server name who will serve them. Regarding OWA mail client, the difference is that the user will need to manually type the URL address that includes the FQDN of the Exchange server name. In a scenario of multiple Public faces Exchange site, OWA mail clients from regional Public facing Exchange site can choose to use the “primary namespace” as the Exchange server name or the “regional namespace” as the Exchange server name. We will discuss this scenario in more details in the section OWA client protocol connectivity flow in a multiple Public facing Exchange site environment OWA Mail client – Specifying manually the host name of the Exchange server The main difference between the OWA client versus another Exchange mail client such as Outlook or Mobile (ActiveSync) client is that, most of the time, OWA client will manually type the URL address of the Exchange server instead getting the name of the “Exchange server” from the Autodiscover process. In other words, the OWA client needs to know their Exchange server name versus other Exchange clients that use the Autodiscover process for “locating for them” the required Exchange server name. In case of that “regional OWA user” such as: OWA user whom his mailbox is located on a “regional Exchange site” (Madrid site in our scenario), OWA user who needs to access their mailbox, can use one of the following naming convention’s options for the Exchange server host name: 1. Using the primary namespace – in our scenario, the “primary namespace” that represents the “New York Public facing Exchange CAS” is: mail.o365info.com In case that a “Madrid OWA user” use the primary namespace as the Exchange server name (OWA URL), the “New York Public facing Exchange CAS” recognizes that the user is a “Madrid OWA users” and redirect him to the “Madrid Public facing Exchange CAS”. 2. Using the regional namespace – in a scenario of “Madrid OWA user”, the OWA user can use the regional namespace as the Exchange server name (OWA URL).
  • 5. Page 5 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment | 3/4 Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015 For example: europe.mail.o365info.com. In this scenario, the OWA Madrid user will access ”his Exchange server” directly. Note – the scenario of: “regional OWA mail client” and the redirection process is not unique or related only to Exchange 2007 OWA client, but instead, to any Exchange OWA client that is involved in a scenario of multiple Public facing Exchange site and regional namespace. The special charters of Exchange 2007 OWA Mail client in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment The process of serving Exchange 2007 OWA mail clients (Exchange users whom their mailbox is hosted on Exchange 2007 Mailbox server), is different from the “other mail protocols” because, Exchange 2013 “doesn’t know” how to proxy the OWA mail client requests. Instead, the Exchange CAS 2013 will redirect the “Exchange 2007 OWA mail clients” to their Exchange 2007 CAS server. This is the main reason for the using the “legacy namespace”. The “redirection message”, that the Exchange 2013 CAS server will send to the “Exchange 2007 OWA mail clients browser” includes the URL address of the Exchange 2007 CAS server who will be able to “serve” the Exchange 2007 OWA mail client requests. The URL that the Exchange 2013 CAS server provide includes the FQDN (the “legacy namespace) that points to the Exchange 2007 CAS server.
  • 6. Page 6 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment | 3/4 Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015 The concept of silent redirection and SSO In the former sections, we have a review two different scenarios in which the Exchange 2013 CAS will redirect Exchange 2007 clients to their “destination Exchange CAS server”. The redirection method that is used by the Exchange 2013 CAS CU2, include two major improvements that are related to the process of: redirecting OWA mail client. The 2013 CAS CU2 Improvements are: 1. Silent redirect 2. SSO
  • 7. Page 7 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment | 3/4 Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015 Former version of Exchange CAS server and the OWA redirection method Although the Exchange 2013 CU2 server version implements the “OWA redirection” process in an improved way, it’s important to emphasize that the “OWA redirection method”, is not a new Exchange method and that the OWA redirection method was included in former versions of Exchange server (as far as I know since the Exchange 2007 server version). In a former version of Exchange server, the OWA redirection method that was implemented by the Exchange server for “redirecting OWA client” to their Exchange server, could be described as “passive”. The “OWA redirection” was implemented by displaying a “message window”, which was sent by the Exchange server to the OWA client. The “redirection information” was presented to the OWA user as a “click able link”. I describe this method as: “passive redirection”, because the only responsibility of the Exchange server was to display a message with the link to the OWA client. The user’s responsibility is to:  “Understand” that the link that was presented in the message, is the link to the “right Exchange server”  That he needs to click on the link that will redirect him to his Exchange CAS server. Additionally to the user requirement to “understand” that he needs to click on the link, OWA users, had an experience that can be described as: ”double login”.
  • 8. Page 8 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment | 3/4 Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015 The meaning is that: OWA users, had to re provide their user credentials again, to the “new destination Exchange server“ (the “destination” Exchange 2007 CAS). Exchange 2013 CAS server version CU2 and the OWA redirection method Exchange 2013 CAS server version CU2, includes two major features that significantly improve the “Exchange OWA client” experience:  A silent redirection (active redirection) – The Exchange 2013 CAS server knows how to send a redirection “command” to the Exchange 2007 OWA browser, that will redirect the OWA session to the “new URL address” (the legacy URL address of the Exchange 2007 CAS server).  SSO – Exchange 2013 CAS server knows how to “transfer” or “forward” (Proxy) the OWA user credentials to the “destination” Exchange 2007 CAS server.
  • 9. Page 9 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment | 3/4 Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015 The method which Exchange CAS 2013 use for redirecting OWA client described as: “silent” because, the OWA user is not involved throughout the process. The only thing that the OWA user “see” is a short flush on his browsers (the redirection process from the Exchange 2013 CAS OWA login page in the OWA login page from the destination Exchange server). The “Exchange 2007 OWA client” is not aware of the complicated redirection process. From the “Exchange 2007 OWA client” point of view, this process is transparent. Note – although we mention the Exchange 2013 CAS method of: silent redirection + SSO in the context of the Exchange 2007 OWA client, this method is implemented in any type of Exchange OWA client in a scenario of multiple Public facing Exchange sites.
  • 10. Page 10 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment | 3/4 Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015 Q1: How actually the OWA client silent redirection process is implemented? A1: The “OWA redirection process”, is implemented by “cooperation” of the Exchange CAS 2013 and the client browser. Exchange CAS 2013 sends an HTTP redirection command that includes the “new URL address”. The client browser accepts the redirection command and addresses the “destination URL address”
  • 11. Page 11 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment | 3/4 Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015 OWA connectivity flow | Exchange 2007 client | Scenarios Scenario 1: External 2007 OWA client | User mailbox located at the New York site. Scenario charters: an external Exchange 2007 OWA client, need to get access to his mailbox.  Exchange user type: Exchange 2007 client (Exchange user whom his mailbox is hosted on the Exchange 2007 mailbox server).  Exchange mailbox server location: the Exchange 2007 Mailbox server who hosts the user mailbox, is located on the New York site.  The New York site includes two public Exchange CAS servers: Exchange 2013 CAS and Exchange 2007 CAS.
  • 12. Page 12 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment | 3/4 Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015 The OWA protocol connectivity flow, will be implemented as follows: 1. The “New York Exchange 2007 OWA client”, type the following URL addresseshttps://mail.o365info.com/owa The URL address that the OWA client use, includes the FQDN: mail.o365info.com which points to the Public facing CAS2013 server in New York site (Number 1). 2. The external OWA client, provide his user credentials. 3. CAS2013 uses the user credentials and performs the Active Directory lookup. CAS2013 determines that: o The user mailbox version is: 2007 o That the local site include a Public facing Exchange 2007CAS server o That the URL address of the Public facing Exchange 2007 CAS server is: https://legacy.mail.o365info.com/owa 4. The Exchange CAS2013 will implement two different procedures: 1. Initiate silent redirect process – the “New York Public facing Exchange 2013” sends a redirection command to the “external Exchange 2007 OWA client browser” that includes the FQDN of the “Public facing Exchange 2007 CAS server”: legacy.mail.o365info.com (Number 2). 2. Initiate SSO process – the “New York Public facing Exchange 2013” implements the process of SSO, by forwarding (proxy) the Exchange 2007 OWA user credentials, to the “Public facing Exchange 2007 CAS server” (Number 8). 5. The “external Exchange 2007 OWA mail client browser, “gets” the redirection command from the CAS2013 and, starts a new HTTPS session with the ” Public facing Exchange 2007 CAS server” (Number 3). 6. The Public facing Exchange 2007 CAS server (legacy.mail.o365info.com) will then facilitate the request and retrieve the necessary data from the Exchange 2007 Mailbox server (Number 5). 7. The Exchange 2007 Mailbox server, provides the required user mailbox content to the CAS2007 (Number 6). 8. The CAS2007 sends the information to the “external Exchange 2007 OWA client” (Number 7).
  • 13. Page 13 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment | 3/4 Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015 Scenario 2: Exchange 2007 OWA client | User mailbox located at the Los Angles site. Scenario charters: an external Exchange 2007 Outlook client, need to access his mailbox. Note – To simplify the step’s description, we will relate only to the “external OWA 2007 client” but the same logic and flow are implemented also to the “internal OWA client”.  Exchange user type: Exchange 2007 client (Exchange user whom his mailbox is hosted on the Exchange 2007 mailbox server).
  • 14. Page 14 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment | 3/4 Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015  The Exchange 2007 user mailbox, is hosted on the Los Angles site (the Exchange 2007 Mailbox server located on the Los Angles site).  The Exchange 2007 Mailbox server who hosts the user mailbox and the Public facing Exchange 2013 CAS server are not at the same Active Directory site.  The New York site, have a “local” Exchange 2007 CAS. In this scenario, the same logic will be maintained. Exchange CAS 2013 server redirects the Exchange 2007 OWA client to the Public facing Exchange 2007 CAS server. The “New York Public facing Exchange 2007 CAS server” authenticates the user, performs an Active Directory lookup and determines that the user mailbox is located at the Los Angles site.  The “New York Public facing Exchange 2007 CAS server” will proxy the request to the “internal Los Angles Exchange 2007 CAS server” (Number 3).  Los Angles Exchange 2007 CAS server” will proxy the request to the “Los Angles Exchange 2007 Mailbox server” (Number 4).
  • 15. Page 15 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment | 3/4 Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015 OWA client protocol connectivity flow in a multiple Public facing Exchange site environment In the following section, we will review the OWA client protocol connectivity flow of an external OWA Madrid user who tries to access his mailbox and use the primary namespace as the URL address.
  • 16. Page 16 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment | 3/4 Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015 When the OWA Madrid user uses the primary namespace (https://mail.o365info.com/owa), the Host name will be resolved to the IP address of the “New York Public facing Exchange CAS server”. When the “New York Public facing Exchange CAS server” recognizes that the user considers as a “Madrid user” and that – this OWA client should access “his Public facing Exchange CAS server”, the “New York Public facing Exchange CAS” will implement a method which described as: silent redirection + SSO. Note – the method of silent redirection and SSO is not related only to a scenario of Exchange 2007 OWA client, but, to any other type of external OWA client such as Exchange 2013 OWA clients. The external OWA scenarios In the next section, we will demonstrate OWA flow scenarios in which “OWA Madrid user” (user that his mailbox is hosted at Madrid site will use the primary namespace as the URL address: https://mail.o365info.com/owa In the following diagram, we can see that the Exchange public infrastructure includes two Public facing Exchange sites: the New York site and the Madrid site. Each of the Exchange site has a Public facing Exchange CAS server.  The public name of the “New York Public facing Exchange CAS” is: mail.o365info.com  The public name of the “Madrid Public facing Exchange CAS” is: europe.mail.o365info.com
  • 17. Page 17 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment | 3/4 Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015 “Regional OWA users” (Madrid user in our scenario) can choose to use one of the optional URL address. The Madrid Public facing Exchange CAS server is represented by a dedicated namespace (regional namespace): europe.mail.o365info.com In case that external OWA Madrid user is familiar with the “Madrid regional namespace”, he can use the URL address: https://europe.mail.o365info.com/owa The additional option that the OWA Madrid user can use is: using the primary namespace which will “lead him” to the “New York Public facing Exchange CAS”. In this case the OWA Madrid user can use the URL address: https://mail.o365info.com/owa
  • 18. Page 18 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment | 3/4 Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015 When the “New York Public facing Exchange CAS” gets the connection request from the “OWA Madrid user”, he will implement a method was described as: “silent redirection” which will redirect the OWA Madrid user, to “his Madrid Public facing Exchange CAS server”. Scenario 3: OWA client | User mailbox located on the Madrid site | Regional namespace |destination site = Public facing Scenario charters: an external Exchange OWA 2007 client, need to access his mailbox.
  • 19. Page 19 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment | 3/4 Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015  The Exchange 2007 user mailbox, is hosted on the Madrid site (the Exchange 2007 Mailbox server located on the Madrid site).  The “Madrid Exchange site” considers as: Public facing Exchange site.  The external OWA user uses the primary namespace as the URL address of the Exchange server (https://mail.o365info.com/owa).  The regional namespace that was “allocated” to the Madrid site is: europe.mail.o365info.com In the current scenario, an “OWA Madrid user” use the URL address: https://mail.o365info.com/owa for access his mailbox. The OWA protocol connectivity flow will be implemented as follows: 1. Madrid Exchange 2007 OWA client, type the following URL addresseshttps://mail.o365info.com/owa The FQDN: mail.o365info.com points to the “New York Public facing Exchange CAS server” (Number 1). 2. The external OWA client, provide his user credentials. 3. CAS2013 uses the user credentials and performs the Active Directory lookup. CAS2013 determines that: o The user mailbox version is: 2007 o The Exchange 2007 mailbox server that host the user mailbox, is located at the Madrid site o The remote site (Madrid site) is a Public facing Exchange site o That the “OWA address” of the “Madrid Public facing Exchange CAS server” is: https://europe.mail.o365info.com/owa 4. The Exchange CAS2013 will implement two different procedures: 1. Initiate silent redirect process – the “New York Public facing Exchange 2013” sends a redirection command to the “Madrid Exchange 2007 OWA client browser” that includes the FQDN of the “Europe Exchange 2007 Public facing Exchange CAS”: europe.mail.o365info.com (Number 2). 2. Initiate SSO process – the “New York Public facing Exchange 2013” implements the process of SSO, by forwarding (proxy) the Exchange 2007 user credentials, to the “Europe Exchange 2007 Public facing Exchange CAS” (Number 8). 5. The “Madrid Exchange 2007 OWA mail client browser, “gets” the redirection command from the CAS2013 and, starts a new HTTPS session with the “Madrid Exchange 2007 Public facing Exchange CAS” (Number 3).
  • 20. Page 20 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment | 3/4 Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015 6. The Madrid Exchange 2007 Public facing Exchange CAS (europe.mail.o365info.com) will then facilitate the request and retrieve the necessary data from the Exchange 2007 Mailbox server (Number 5). 7. The Madrid Exchange 2007 Mailbox server, provides the required user mailbox content to the Madrid CAS2007 (Number 6). 8. The Madrid CAS2007 sends the information to the “external Exchange 2007 OWA client” (Number7). Additional reading Proxying and Redirection
  • 21. Page 21 of 21 | Part 18#23 |OWA client protocol connectivity flow in Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence environment | 3/4 Written by Eyal Doron | o365info.com | Copyright © 2012-2015  Understanding Proxying and Redirection  Exchange 2013 interoperability with legacy Exchange versions OWA Cross-Site Silent Redirection  OWA Cross-Site Silent Redirection in Exchange 2007 SP2  Enabling Silent OWA Redirection for Office 365 Hybrid  Enabling Silent OWA Redirection for Office 365 Hybrid  Overview of Exchange Server 2007 CAS Proxying and Redirection  Outlook Web Access and Exchange 2007, 2003 and 2000 coexistence  Client Connectivity in an Exchange 2013 Coexistence Environment  Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 Deployment and Coexistence The Exchange 2013 coexistence article series index page