This document summarizes recent and forthcoming copyright decisions from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). It discusses cases related to exclusive rights including distribution rights, digital exhaustion, communication to the public, and linking. It also covers exceptions and limitations such as parody and library digitization. Upcoming cases involve private copying levies, linking, broadcasting music, and software exhaustion. The European Commission has launched a Digital Single Market strategy to improve access to online goods and services across Europe and maximize growth of the digital economy.
Neighbouring rights for publishers: are national and (possible) EU initiative...Eleonora Rosati
To tackle the financial difficulties facing the newspaper industry, different solutions have been advanced in Europe. These have resulted in either the conclusion of consensual agreements or the adoption of national legislative initiatives to create sui generis rights over news content. Currently also the EU Commission is considering whether a neighbouring right for publishers – whether in the press sector alone or also other sectors – should be proposed for adoption at the EU level.
This contribution discusses: (1) the compatibility with EU law of national legislative initiatives that have resulted in the creation of sui generis rights for press publishers; and (2) whether a neighbouring right for publishers may be adopted at the EU level and, if so, what changes of the copyright acquis are required. It concludes that, while the former may be contrary to Member States’ obligations under EU law, the latter may be pursued by amending relevant directives.
Neighbouring rights for publishers: are national and (possible) EU initiative...Eleonora Rosati
To tackle the financial difficulties facing the newspaper industry, different solutions have been advanced in Europe. These have resulted in either the conclusion of consensual agreements or the adoption of national legislative initiatives to create sui generis rights over news content. Currently also the EU Commission is considering whether a neighbouring right for publishers – whether in the press sector alone or also other sectors – should be proposed for adoption at the EU level.
This contribution discusses: (1) the compatibility with EU law of national legislative initiatives that have resulted in the creation of sui generis rights for press publishers; and (2) whether a neighbouring right for publishers may be adopted at the EU level and, if so, what changes of the copyright acquis are required. It concludes that, while the former may be contrary to Member States’ obligations under EU law, the latter may be pursued by amending relevant directives.
Campaigns to actively make governments more open and improve FOI legislation:...mysociety
Presented at AlaveteliCon 2019 in Oslo. More details of the conference can be found here: https://www.mysociety.org/transparency/alaveteli/alavetelicon-2019/
Campaigns to actively make governments more open and improve FOI legislation:...mysociety
Presented at AlaveteliCon 2019 in Oslo. More details of the conference can be found here: https://www.mysociety.org/transparency/alaveteli/alavetelicon-2019/
UPC Land in Sight - Three (3) Important Facts, Five (5) Myths, and Ten (10) P...Martin Schweiger
A talk before the International Intellectual Property Society (New York)
by Martin Schweiger
on February 03, 2023
Since the 70ies of the last century, there have been efforts to create a uniform European patent that could replace all national patents.
Now, only 50 years later, there is a “Unitary Patent Package” at reach, a combination of the Unitary Patent regulations and an Agreement on the Unified Patent Court (UPC).
That package created the “UPC Land”.
The UPC/UP system is said to start on June 1, 2023
Rebecca O'Neill - Exploring CC Licencesdri_ireland
Presentation given by Rebecca O'Neill, Project Coordinator at Wikimedia Ireland, at a DRI-Wikimedia Ireland co-hosted workshop "Exploring Creative Commons Licences" at the Royal Irish Academy on Tuesday 5 September, 2017.
SOPA, OPEN, ACTA and parallel copyright reforms in Europe, The right way to t...beamatinet
Conference Jan. 23 2012, Stanford Law School on SOPA, OPEN, ACTA and parallel copyright reforms in Europe, The right way to tackle online infringement?
(by @beamartinet)
The European perspective – an EU update
The EU Collective Rights Management Directive is now being implemented, and the EU #digitalsinglemarket project – pre-Brexit - includes a review of the satellite and cable directive as well as a copyright and safe harbours review. Since the beginning of 2015, more than four consultations have been conducted, three communications delivered, one resolution by the European Parliament adopted, and one new regulation has been drafted.
Where is this all going? What are the new rules, the latest discussions and the implications?
Sophie Goossens, August Debouzy and acting for the European Commission cross-sector consultation on the future EU Funding programs in music
Europeana Sounds training session on intellectual property rights (24 June 2015)Europeana_Sounds
Lisette Kalshoven facilitated this training session on intellectual property rights that took place in Athens Concert Hall on June 24th, 2015 in the frame of Europeana Sounds' aggregation and mid-year meeting.
Clare Lanigan - Copyright in digital environmentsdri_ireland
Presentation given by Clare Lanigan, Education and Outreach Manager, DRI, at 'Copyright Issue in Academic Libraries' seminar, organised by the Academic & National Library Training Co-operative in CONUL (Consortium of National & University Libraries) on 23 October 2017, Royal Irish Academy, Dublin.
Cross-border Extended Collective Licensing: A Solution to Online Disseminatio...EUscreen
Presentation by Johan Axhamn about cross-border extended collective licensing as a possible solution to the online dissemination of Europe’s cultural heritage at the Second EUscreen International Conference on Use and Creativity, which took place at the National Library of Sweden, Stockholm, on September 15-16, 2011.
IPR: Legal Issues in Research Data Collection and Sharing by EUDAT | www.euda...EUDAT
| www.eudat.eu | v1.0, June 2014 - The development of skills and competence to manage IPR and leverage its influence requires increasing focus. However, how much detail do you know? Take copyright for example, What exactly is protected?, What rights are reserved and for how long? This presentation addresses such questions on copyright and other topics such as Database Right, Trade Secret and Licensing.
Who is it for?: Researchers, Data Managers, General public.
Clare Lanigan - Copyright and digital preservationdri_ireland
Presented at DRI Members Forum, 6th March 2019 by Clare Lanigan, Education & Outreach Manager at DRI. An overview of copyright requirements when archiving and publishing digital collections.
StopSoftwarePatents - Software Patents in Europe via the caselaw of a central patent court.
Also available in PDF here:
http://media.ffii.org/25C3/ssp2.pdf
UK copyright, online intermediaries and enforcementLilian Edwards
What evidence do judges take into acount when they decide to block websites to prevent copyright infringement? Using case reports of s 97A CPDA cases in the UK, this paper shows a number of problems with judicial use of empirical evidnece especially as to whether blocking is effective.
Similar to Overview of Recent CJEU Copyright Judgments - ICEL IT Law Conference 2015 (Eleonora Rosati) (20)
DNA Testing in Civil and Criminal Matters.pptxpatrons legal
Get insights into DNA testing and its application in civil and criminal matters. Find out how it contributes to fair and accurate legal proceedings. For more information: https://www.patronslegal.com/criminal-litigation.html
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY v/s Union of India.pptxshweeta209
transfer of the P.I.L filed by lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in Delhi High Court to Supreme Court.
on the issue of UNIFORM MARRIAGE AGE of men and women.
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Victims of crime have a range of rights designed to ensure their protection, support, and participation in the justice system. These rights include the right to be treated with dignity and respect, the right to be informed about the progress of their case, and the right to be heard during legal proceedings. Victims are entitled to protection from intimidation and harm, access to support services such as counseling and medical care, and the right to restitution from the offender. Additionally, many jurisdictions provide victims with the right to participate in parole hearings and the right to privacy to protect their personal information from public disclosure. These rights aim to acknowledge the impact of crime on victims and to provide them with the necessary resources and involvement in the judicial process.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
Introducing New Government Regulation on Toll Road.pdfAHRP Law Firm
For nearly two decades, Government Regulation Number 15 of 2005 on Toll Roads ("GR No. 15/2005") has served as the cornerstone of toll road legislation. However, with the emergence of various new developments and legal requirements, the Government has enacted Government Regulation Number 23 of 2024 on Toll Roads to replace GR No. 15/2005. This new regulation introduces several provisions impacting toll business entities and toll road users. Find out more out insights about this topic in our Legal Brief publication.
4. The 2014 CJEU Report
• In 2014 CJEU completed 69 IP cases
• Cf 2013 Report: 43 cases
• 2014 was year with highest number of cases (1691) ever brought before CJEU
(Court of Justice, General Court, Civil Service Tribunal)
• 1685 completed cases
• Duration of proceedings reduced
• References for a preliminary ruling: 15 months (16.3 in 2013)
• Cases decided without AG Opinion: 208
7. • Exclusive rights
• Distribution right
• Scope of the right: Labianca, C-516/13 (13 May 2015)
• Digital exhaustion: Art&Allposters, C-419/13 (22 January 2015)
• Linking and communication/making available to the public: C More, C-279/13 (26 March 2015)
• GS Media, C-160/15 (pending)
• Exceptions and limitations
• Parody: Deckmyn, C-201/13 (3 September 2014)
• Digitisation of library collections: Ulmer, C-117/13 (11 September 2014)
• Jurisdiction in online infringement cases: Hejduk, C-441/13 (22 January 2015)
• Relationship between copyright, databases and contractual freedom
• What falls under scope of Database Directive: Ryanair, C-30/14 (15 January 2015)
• Terms proposed vs actually agreed: Ulmer, C-117/13 (11 September 2014)
• Private copying levies
• Copydan, C-463/12 (5 March 2015)
• HP Belgium, C-572/13 (pending)
• Egeda, C-470/14 (pending)
• Nokia Italia, C-110/15 (pending)
8. Exclusive rights
Do you need permission to:
• advertise sale of copyright-protected works?
• resell digital copies of protected works?
• link to live TV broadcasts?
• link to unauthorised works?
9. Do you need permission to advertise sale of protected
works?
• Dimensione Labianca offered for sale in Germany
items infringing copyright in Knoll furniture
• Litigation ensued before German courts, and Knoll
succeeded at both first instance and appeal. Case
eventually reached German Federal Court
• In Cassina, C-456/06, CJEU held that concept of
distribution, otherwise than through sale, applies
only where there is a transfer of the ownership of
that object
10. CJEU response
• (Both AG and Court) Case different from Cassina, Titus Donner, C-5/11, and
Rolex, C-98/13 because here ad not followed by actual sale
• In those cases CJEU used phrase “at the very least” = acts or steps
preceding sale may also fall within distribution
• The right of distribution encompasses the right to prevent "an offer for sale
or a targeted advertisement of the original or a copy of that work, even if it
is not established that that advertisement gave rise to the purchase of the
protected work by an EU buyer, in so far as that advertisement invites
consumers of the Member State in which that work is protected by
copyright to purchase it."
11. Do you need permission to resell digital copies?
• Unauthorised making and selling of altered versions of works
(transfer of posters on canvas)
• Could this reproduction be considered OK because of
exhaustion of the right of distribution?
• Recital 28
“Copyright protection under this Directive includes the exclusive
right to control distribution of the work incorporated in a tangible
article. The first sale in the Community of the original of a work or
copies thereof by the rightholder or with his consent exhausts the
right to control resale of that object in the Community”
• Recital 29
“The question of exhaustion does not arise in the case of services
and on-line services in particular”
• Agreed statements Article 6 WCT: only tangible copies
12. CJEU response
• AG Cruz Villalón: right of distribution can be only exhausted in
relation to tangible support (corpus mechanicum) of a work
• “[T]he EU legislature, by using the terms ‘tangible article’ and ‘that
object’, wished to give authors control over the initial … it should be
found that exhaustion of the distribution right applies to the tangible
object into which a protected work or its copy is incorporated if it has
been placed onto the market with the copyright holder’s consent."
13. Do you need permission to link to live
TV broadcasts?
• Mr Sandberg set up website providing links
circumventing C More's paywall and allowing users
to watch live ice hockey matches without paying
• Court of Appeal of Nedre Norrland ruled that no
copyright had been infringed since C More's works
could not be considered sufficiently original (cf FAPL)
• Litigation reached Swedish Supreme Court
14. CJEU response
• Making available to the public forms part of the "wider" communication
to the public
• “[I]n order to be classified as an act of 'making available to the public' …
an act must meet, cumulatively … that members of the public may access
the protected work from a place and at a time individually chosen by
them“
• Del Corso, C-135/10
• Member States can protect broadcasts by means of other provisions,
notably those resulting from Article 8(3) of Rental and Lending Rights
Directive
15. Do you need permission to link
to unauthorised works?
• Leaked pictures to be published by Playboy
• Geen Stijl provided link to zip file with
pictures
• Litigation ensued before Dutch courts
• Supreme Court: unclear how linking to source
freely accessible online, but which
communicates to the public without the
consent of the copyright holder, should be
qualified
• Is it a communication to a ‘new public’?
18. The AG Opinion and the CJEU decision
• Structure: original
• Subject: can target an earlier work
or something/someone else
• No need to distinguish between
parody, caricature and pastiche
• Effect: humorous (intent or effect?)
• Content: compliant with the deepest
values of EU society
• Features:
• evoke an existing work while being
noticeably different (no originality
though)
• constitute an expression of humour or
mockery (according to whom??)
• “Legitimate interest” not to be
associated with discriminatory
parody
AG Cruz Villalon CJEU
19. Can libraries digitise their collections?
• Article 5(3)(n) read in conjunction with Article 5(2)(c)
to be interpreted as allowing MSs to grant publicly
accessible libraries to digitise
• An ‘ancillary right’ to digitise
• Anything new?
• What if a MS has one but not also other exception?
21. • Private copying levies
• Member States enjoy great degree of discretion re fair compensation
• Determining who must pay the levy
• By default is producers of blank media (Padawan; Amazon.com)
• Even state budget? Egeda
• Level of compensation must be linked to harm suffered by rightholder (Copydan)
• Whether individual or business costumer matters
• Can exemption from payment be left to private bargaining? Nokia Italia
• Does it matter who reproduces? HP Belgium
• Linking (Playboy case)
• Is broadcasting music in rehab training rooms something that requires
permission?
• Exhaustion for infringing copies of software
23. The Digital Single Market Strategy
• 3 pillars
1. Better access for consumers and businesses to online goods and services across
Europe
2. Creating the right conditions for digital networks and services to flourish
3. Maximising the growth potential of European digital economy
• Translated into copyright language: