Has combustion automation changed much since the advent of the distributed control system (DCS)? When automobile technology transitioned from carburetors to fuel injection, it brought a new standard of safe, reliable, clean, efficient performance. However, other than widespread adoption of NFPA codes, operation of fired assets such as heaters, furnaces, ethane crackers, and steam methane reformers really hasn’t changed much in decades. Imprecise, inaccurate, and often corrupted process data conspires to leave operators with sloppy control loops and ambiguities, which lead to questions such as: • Do I really know that my purge is complete? • What are my ideal set points? • Can I truly trust the data on my screen? • How close to ideal can I safely run? • How do I know when I’m operating dangerously? • When I get in trouble, is a trip my only recourse? These uncertainties can produce inconsistent decisions and, in turn, unnecessary fuel consumption, non-optimal process throughput, excessive emissions, accelerated aging of assets, increased maintenance, and, most importantly, safety compromises. It doesn’t have to be like this; there’s a better way to combust. With its initial founding derived from the recommendations of IEC 556, Yokogawa has re-drawn the limits of safe, efficient, clean combustion. Through the proven path of CombustionONE, Yokogawa welcomes all fired asset operators to explore beyond the "Flat Earth Era" of combustion automation.