Optimization of PV Cell through MPPT Algorithm

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 09 Issue: 01 | Jan 2022 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 547
Optimization of PV Cell through MPPT Algorithm
Vivek Patel1, Lalit Verma2*
1M.tech Student, Department of Energy Technology, Aditya College of technology & Science, Satna
2*Asst. Professor, Department of Energy Technology, Aditya College of technology & Science, Satna
-----------------------------------------------------------------------***------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. ABSTRACT
On the other hand, the design of a stand-alone system, which is insulated from the grid, is often tailored to meet DC and/or
electrical demands. Photovoltaic (PV) modules, whether used at night or at any time of day, convert sunlight into direct current
(DC) electricity, which is then stored in a bank of batteries. It is possible to utilize the battery's DC output to power low-voltage DC
loads like a light bulb or a refrigerator, or it may be used to operate the load under negative pressure. The collective activity of the
complicated mechanism system is designed to fulfil the demands of solar energy and the maximum capacity of the battery,
because the solar system outputs under seasonal circumstances. Rather of relying on conventional grid expansion, independent PV
systems may explore using high-quality power services. Solar and rural electricity program and forums use it as the most popular
option. Fuel is the primary source of most energy initiatives and conventional energy sources like fossil. Coal, natural gas, and
crude oil, for example, are often utilized as energy sources. It's often referred to as "renewable energy." However, a water storage
system is required to create energy. Traditional sources of energy have a finite supply. Renewable energy sources like solar power
and equipment are vital to their success. First, we'll employ the DC independent voltage source inverter model. Instead of utilizing
an input source, connect to the PVC system. Input source and inverter manufacturing were examined and assessed. An
unstructured DC power output. Changing weather conditions have a major impact on the supply of solar arrays. Solar PV
Standalone systems are examined in this thesis, and the MPPT method used to maximize output power is a major focus area.
Keyword: Solar PV Standalone, Battery’s DC Output, Solar and Rural Electricity
II. INTRODUCTION
In view of the recent rise in the costs of oil, gas, uranium, and coal, it is imperative that all nations explore alternate energy
sources. As a result of these price rises, many nations that have previously been poor would be unable to afford gasoline and
food, health care, education, and other essentials1. Human emissions of carbon-burning greenhouse gases pose a grave danger
to the long-term stability of our planet's climate. 2) Fossil fuels are used in all major emerging nations. Burning nuclear fuel
has serious health and environmental consequences, as well as environmental degradation and security risks [1].As a result of
these circumstances, the world has already reacted."Investment in renewable energy has risen from $ 6 billion in 1995 to $ 17
billion in 2002, according to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). Renewable energy sources are seen as
critical by everyone involved in the field of sustainable energy. An important goal of this effort is establishing a commitment to
adding more power, recognizing the role of national and intentional national aims and current actions, and ensuring that
vitality strategies support building up countries' attempts to eliminate poverty. To monitor progress on points [2], evaluate
existing data on a regular basis.Even in rich and developing nations, renewable resources, the fastest-growing energy source,
have yet to realize their full potential in terms of both technology and economics.Just 3% of the world's entire energy supply
comes from renewable sources. There are several economic, societal, and legal obstacles to renewable resources achieving
their full potential. It's possible to overcome these barriers. In many jurisdictions, they have been effectively fought off. Many
emerging nations have shown success. In order to eliminate these impediments, acquire the proper pricing signals, and
stimulate effective usage of renewable resources everywhere, legislation may be implemented. For developing nations, this
study focuses on ways to eliminate these obstacles and encourage the use of renewable resources, especially in rural regions,
in developing countries.
2.1 Resources Covered
Solar electricity produced by individual buildings or groups of buildings, or the power generated by central stations used to
form vast arrays, are included in this category of renewable resources. Hot water or heating is provided by companies that
focus on fixed hot water sources or solar ponds, electricity from central stations, power from wind, heat from ground owing to
various geothermal applications, heat from ground, ocean tides and waves, and heat from the earth. Make use of parabolic
collectors. Small hydroelectric power plants, agricultural waste [3] to biomethanization, biomass crops cultivated for energy

consumption, or cellulose waste from crops may all be used to generate electricity. Ethanol or gasification is used to generate
heat, power, and transportation fuels from the biomass.Traditional biomass, such as straw, is not, however, regarded as a
regenerative resource. If these women and children are boiled and cooked in a tight environment, they are at risk of major
health complications. The same holds true for cooking and heating using animal excrement. Biomass, however, is said to
include ethanol, gasified wood, and agricultural waste from the current day.Nuclear power is not included in this study
because of its high capital and operating costs, complicated specialized requirements for task and maintenance, and
unresolved distribution and waste transport difficulties. A nuclear power plant's vulnerability to terrorist assaults,
particularly in spent fuel pools outside the control room and containment, is an issue that has arisen after the September 11,
2001, attacks on the World Trade Center in New York.Nuclear power is not a sustainable source of energy for poor nations
since it is both costly and technically complex to reprocess spent fuel. Dissemination of the process of reprocessing is
especially vulnerable. This is since cockroaches may be used as a weapon and do not pose a significant threat to the detection
process. Because trash incineration is very polluting and waste recycling programs are cleaner and more cost-effective, waste
incineration energy is abolished.
2.2 Photovoltaic Systems Work
Many cells (often silicon) are arranged on a metal frame to create a module in photovoltaic systems. In vast numbers, these
batteries create significant amounts of electricity without moving components, noise, or pollutants when exposed to the sun's
radiation. More than one factor determines how much power is produced. How much solar energy can be converted into
useable electricity depends on several factors, including the size of the PV system, the layout and arrangement of the PV
modules, and the efficiency of the electrical components used to do so [7].
2.2.1 How Photovoltaic Energy is Distributed
Utility companies deliver most of the electricity. Produces and distributes energy to regional or state customers via a firm
called a power company. The central hub distributes power to end users through a network of transmission lines, distribution
networks, substations, and equipment networks. From power plants to thousands of residences and businesses, the grid may
stretch across hundreds of kilometers.
2.2.2 Owning a Photovoltaic System
Even though the distribution of the solar system is categorized along the grid, it is not required to depend on a power
business. There are practically no power outages when the system is overloaded or there is terrible weather.There's no
need to worry about the electricity system in your house or lifestyle if you have solar panels installed. Only the utility
company's system must be activated. Until your system is producing enough energy to meet your home and business
demands, you should continue to rely on the utility grid. A solar system's output will fluctuate over the course of a year,
and the power provider will store the energy you don't need. [8]. At night or when the sun isn't shining as brightly, or
when there are shadows owing to the weather, it may be use.
2.3 Facts about PV Systems
 Multifunctional Land Use: The range of territory that may be covered by a solar power system is vast (1 MW of
output Equals 6-8 acres). Sun-generating buildings may also offer cover for parking lots and/or crops in need of
protection from the sun's rays, in addition to producing electricity.
 Photovoltaic Cells Work on Cloudy Days: It's a common misconception that when a cloud blocks a solar cell's
light transmission, it doesn't affect its ability to generate electricity.
 Sunlight for a Year: Calculations show that the amount of energy that the planet receives from the sun in an hour
may last the whole year.
 PV Cells Face South in the USA: Due to the equator's position in the south of the world's 50 sunniest states, the
solar cell should face south of the United States if it wants the most sunlight.
 The Sun is powered by Hydrogen: Currently, the sun is propelled by the burning of hydrogen, but as soon as the
hydrogen supply runs out, the solar will begin to consume the helium supply.

2.4 MPPT Techniques
When it comes to solar panel systems, tracking the maximum power point (MPP) of an array is an essential component. This
has resulted in a wide range of MPPT approaches, each of which has been tweaked to address its shortcomings. It is tough to
choose the optimal approach for building a PV system since there are so many options. The intricacy of these technologies, the
number of sensors necessary, the digital or analogue implementation, the convergence speed, tracking capabilities, and cost-
effectiveness all vary. MPPT algorithms may be selected based on the kind of application, as well. As a result, this page sums up
the most prevalent MPPT technology in use today. In order to construct a system that responds to a broad variety of lighting
situations, two interesting techniques have been suggested.
2.5. Perturbation and Observation (P & O) Method
At regular intervals, voltage or current changes are made to the array terminals and compared to prior sample points, as
illustrated in Figure 1.1.1. The control system adjusts the PV array operating point if the PV array operating voltage changes
and the power rises (dP / dVPV> 0). The operating point shifts in the other direction if this happens. The algorithm continues
to operate in the same manner at each disruption location. The technology is simple, which is the key benefit of this approach.
In addition, there is no need to be familiar with the properties of traditional solar panels. The basic variant of this strategy
works well until the sun radiation varies too quickly. When in steady condition, the operating point varies somewhat about the
MPP voltage. When disturbances occur often, it is imperative that the system attain steady state before another disturbance
occurs. If the disturbance step size is too small, it might impact the controller's performance and generate inconsistencies in
the PV array's output, which is not desirable.
At low radiation levels, classical perturbation observation (P & O) approaches are ineffective. Because of this, different
solutions have been suggested. As an example, see [4] for example. Figure 1.2 shows how the CV algorithm and the enhanced P
& O approach work together to efficiently monitor MPPs in both low and high sunlight situations. When the PV output voltage
reaches the panel's open circuit voltage (VOC), this method increases the duty cycle and uses it as a beginning condition for the
MPP tracker. Afterwards, the algorithm analyses the current output. Po technique is used when current exceeds (0.7 A) in
algorithm. If it's low, use the CV technique instead. Using simulations, it is possible to extract more energy from the PV panel.
Across a broad variety of illumination conditions, efficiency ratings of 95% to 99% are reported. Combining these two
approaches is difficult, though. When there are sudden variations in light levels, the P & O approach also tends to be
uncooperative. MPP tracking may become incorrect or sluggish as a result of this. A modified P&O (MP&O) technique was
devised by Liu et al. and Wu [12] to address this issue. Add an irradiance change estimating mechanism to each disturbance to
determine how much power is lost as a result of the change in circumstances. Compared to the old P & O approach, the
findings demonstrate an improvement in performance.MP & O tracking, on the other hand, is a lot slower than typical P & O
methods. Lui and others To speed up the MP & O method's tracking speed. The estimate, disturbance, and disturbance (EPP)
approach proposed by Lui et al. [[12]] is available. Every two perturbation stages, the EPP algorithm performs an estimating
step. Researchers found that EPP's tracking speed and accuracy were comparable to those of MP & O's algorithm.
2.6 Incremental Conductance (IC) Method
When combined with an incremental conductance photovoltaic method (IC), the perturbation and observation algorithm's
drawbacks are solved. When calculating conductance, this approach uses the incremental conductance to find a voltage
operating point that is equivalent to that conductance. Systems are not interfering with this point in time. To take use of this
approach, you must first know how far away the maximum power point (MPP) is in order to calculate its approximate location.
Even while improving P & O techniques, it can monitor MPP more precisely under changing weather circumstances, compare P
& O approaches, and have less oscillatory behavior around MPP. In addition, the IC algorithm's usage of differential operations
might lead to instability, which is a drawback. A lack of sunshine makes the differentiation process more difficult, which might
lead to measurement errors. Some of the findings may not suffice. It is common for IC tracking systems to employ
predetermined iteration step sizes based on the accuracy and tracking speed requirements. If you want to enhance tracking
speed, you may raise the step size. However, this will impair accuracy.
Like lowering step size, reducing the algorithm's convergence speed increases accuracy. In order to resolve this issue, Lee et al.
[11] investigated a variable IC step size technology. As the solar array's output increases, the step size decreases accordingly.
Increasing the step size of the algorithm if the operating point is distant from the MPP allows it to fast move towards the MPP
operation. However, the step size reduces as the operating point approaches the MPP. Accuracy and speed both benefit from

step changes. Based on experimental findings, the suggested approach is shown to be both fast and resilient. Small-signal
modelling further validates the system's stability in most situations.
Fig. 1: Flowchart of the dP-P & O method. Fig. 2: Flow chart of the IC method.
2.7 Constant Voltage (CV) Method
One of the simplest MPPT algorithms is the constant voltage (CV) technique. Solar output voltages may be matched to the fixed
reference voltage Vref to keep photovoltaic array operating points always close to the maximum power point (MPP). The
voltage (Vmpp) at the maximum power point of the typical photovoltaic array is used as the reference voltage. Using this
approach, one assumes that the PV panel change (such as temperature and radiation) is not considerable and that it is
adequate to attain near MPP performance with a constant reference voltage. As a result, the CV algorithm fails to locate the
MPP accurately in reality. A consistent voltage reference must often be established when the system is being installed, which
necessitates gathering data. This is since it might shift from one location to the next. In low light, constant voltage approaches
outperform perturbation and observation (P&O) and incremental conductance algorithms in terms of performance.
2.8 Temperature (T) Method
Faranda and Coelho's works introduce the temperature MPPT algorithm. The short circuit current (Isc) and open circuit
voltage (Vov) of a solar cell array may be determined using the VI characteristics since the former is related to the irradiance
level (G) and the latter is stable when the cell temperature varies. A direct relationship exists between the temperature (T) of
the solar panels and the whole array temperature (T). This technique makes use of a temperature sensor and a voltage sensor,
both of which are attached to the rear of the PV array. Initial measurements include a comparison of two different parameters:
thermal output temperature (T) and the photovoltaic output voltage (Vvp). The following equation is used to calculate the
maximum power point voltage (Vmpp) based on the test findings.
( ) ( ) ( )

In this example, u vmpp is the temperature coefficient of Vmpp, and Tref is the temperature reference. Since the predicted
value of Vmpp differs from the actual PV voltage, an incremental duty cycle (D) may be calculated (Vvp). At each sample
interval, the PV array output voltage is updated to get it closer to the maximum power point voltage (Figure 1.5). [7]
emphasises that the temperature approach is less efficient than the P & O and IC algorithm [5]. [7] Datasheet information from
the PV array is also needed for temperature calculations. In addition, the algorithm must be updated to account for changes in
system parameters brought on by ageing [23].
Fig. 3: Flowchart of temperature method Fig. 4: flow chart
III. LITERATURE SURVEY
Zhou et al. (2019)Photovoltaic (PV) systems and maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithms are being developed to
meet the growing demand for renewable energy. Classical ascending and proportional integration methods are difficult to use
in quickly changing environments. Fast transient reaction and maximum PV application efficiency are the focus of this article,
which presents the MPPT method. Dp/Dv tracking and a secondary switching surface controller are used in this new approach
to a boost converter.Farhadi-Kangarlu&Marangalu (2019) For stand-alone photovoltaic (PV) systems, a 5-level
photovoltaic inverter structure is described in this study. A five-level inverter and a DC-DC converter are part of the planned
PV conversion system. Under order to accomplish maximum power point tracking (MPPT) in a variety of environmental
circumstances, a DC-DC converter incorporated in an inverter structure is employed (temperature and radiation). Mehiri et
al. (2019)It is proposed in this study that the maximum solar power be tracked using a resilient fractional nonlinear
cooperative (FNSC) MPPT algorithm with strong dynamic responsiveness and quicker convergence to the maximum power
point. The most efficient macro variables applied to fractional operators are compared to various co-control macro variables.
Aside from that, the impact of modifying the score value dependent on the fractional operator used by the controller was also
discovered. Matlab / Simulink is used to compare the proposed MPPT against the NSC, SMC, and P & O MPPT methods, all of
which are well-known.Elmelegi et al. (2019)By virtue of its flexibility and smaller filter size, multi-level inverters provide
various advantages over typical two-stage inverters. In addition to basic frequency switching and high frequency switching,
multilevel inverters may be generated this way as well. In distributed photovoltaic (PV) systems, phase shift pulse width
modulation (PWM) is used to monitor the maximum power point (MPPT). To deal with partial shading, the suggested
modulation approach generates modulation signals for each PV module based on the MPPT, or maximum power point
tracking, algorithm. No additional complexity or look-up tables are required to apply this technique to any number of PV
modules. MATLAB SIMULINK was used to model and evaluate the proposed technology's performance under various radiation
and loading situations.Das et al. (2019)Solar irradiation levels and local climatic variables (temperature and humidity)

necessitate the usage of Photovoltaic System Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) technology. MPPT ensures that the
greatest amount of electricity may be generated. Photovoltaic systems often need voltage and current sensors to monitor their
output. PV systems may be monitored without the need of current sensors, according to a new technology. It not only
decreases system expenses, but also reduces communication strain, internal interference, and complexity inside the
organisation. Luenberger observer technology is used to estimate the current in the proposed system. As a result, the MPPT
approach is used to create the necessary duty cycle for the DC-DC boost converter based on disturbances and observations.
Because of this testing, the suggested procedure was evaluated in comparison to the widely established MPPT approach. It has
been found that the suggested system's findings are quite like the results obtained by sensor-based MPPT technology.Dangor
et al. (2019)Modeling the main inductor current of the discontinuous flyback converter is shown. A sensing resistor is used to
compare the model's predicted current to the actual current measured. If you have a solar panel (PV) that is connected
through a flyback converter to a 12V lead acid battery, this model applies. A model-based Current Disruption Observation (P &
O) Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) method is used to manage the power flow from the PV module.Ghosh (2019)A
unique cross-breed MPPT (maximum extreme power point following) computation is presented in this study. Simple Binary
Sequence (IBS) MPPT and the well-known Perturb and Observe (P and O) MPPT have been combined to create the new MPPT
computation. The maximum power point (MPP) of any sun-powered module may fluctuate due to temperature and insolation
fluctuations, hence this computation provides the flexibility needed by the IBS calculation. Use the IBS calculation to locate the
underlying working point. The P and O computation is used to handle dynamic and momentary changes at this stage. Using the
IBS calculation and reinitializing the parameters if there is any indication of a change in operating circumstances, the whole
calculation is resumed from the earliest beginning point. Using the administrator's points of confinement, the suggested
computation determines when to re-instate the parameters. Simulink and MATLAB are used to run the suggested
computation.
Zurbriggen & Ordonez (2019)It is proposed. Using MPPT and large-sign geometry management, the system creates a robust,
superior setup that is ideal for rapidly expanding irradiance applications, such as wearable innovation and housetop electric
cars, for example (EVs). Scientific tactics and reenactment and testing outcomes support and verify the theoretical evaluation.
Selvakumar et al. (2019)proposed photovoltaic (PV) systems under normal irradiation circumstances and fractional
shadowing, the study of the Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) is essential (PSC). Heydari&Varjani (2019)studied
Topologies such as single-level topology are common in low-effort matrices that are linked to PV frameworks. Power point
tracking and lattice side controllers are implemented in these systems' primary converter, which is a transformer.
Munisekhar et al. (2019)Using the latest and most flexible voltage reference MPPT for Australia and cooling applications in
solar arrays with BLDC drive, this study presents the fastest and most versatile voltage reference MPPT ever. Fastest and most
extreme power point tracking (MPPT) keeps track of variations in the amount of solar-powered radiation. It is possible to
reduce the overall cost of the system by eliminating the standard DC/DC support converter, which reduces exchanging
mishaps and further lowers the overall cost of the framework, in this way restricting the impact transformation arrangement.
Even under the most extreme circumstances, the construction and demonstration of the shortest MPPT calculation presented
for a BLDC engine-driven PV demonstrate feed cooling framework has no influence on performance. Using a reenactment
method, the framework is tested.
Dengsheng et al .(2018), they suggested an MPPT approach based on an adjustable load resistance matching model in order
to address the issue of photovoltaic power production MPPT and local photovoltaic power generation system temperature
management. Amara et al. (2018)Solar panel performance may be improved by using an adaptive neural fuzzy inference
system (ANFIS) based on the maximum power point tracking (ANFIS-MPPT) algorithm and a PI controller. The ANFIS
approach was conceived and developed in this work utilisingMatlab/Simulink software. An additional way of demonstrating
the efficiency of this ANFIS-MPPT technology has been to compare it directly to the Perturb & Observe P&O-MPPT technique
findings. From the findings, it can be concluded that the ANFIS-MPPT command has a higher performance, a more dynamic
manipulation, a quicker convergence, and less delivery than the standard P & O-MPPT command. Fluctuation. Here, we have
shown that ANFIS-MPPT technology's capabilities not only increase performance, but also improve tracking accuracy, speed,
and system stability in a variety of climates. Given the significance of networked solar systems, this enhancement is quite
advantageous. Nour Ali (2018)A grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) system efficiency enhancement is presented in this thesis.
Accurate monitoring of the maximum power point is an important aspect in determining efficiency. There are several classic
approaches that are used to monitor the maximum power point, including perturbation, observation, and incremental
conductance (MPPT). Create a better MPPT control system using artificial intelligence (AI). Maximizing the output of grid-
connected solar systems may be achieved via the use of an artificial neural network (ANN). Alternative inputs to solar
radiation and temperature have been provided in this study to enhance the performance of an ANN-based MPPT system.
Genetic algorithm (GA) ideal for building ANN topology, e.g. the number of neurons in the hidden layer, type of learning

method, and type of activation function for each neuron is the second suggested improvement The advantages of the MPPT
modified ANN design are shown by comparing simulation results.Kazeza& Chowdhury (2018)Stand-alone photovoltaic
powered pump systems (SPVWSS) in irrigation, agricultural, water, and water treatment applications have been studied
extensively A lot of attention is being paid to technological advancements that might help them operate better. For solar and
motor pump systems, design experts have come up with novel techniques to speed up and increase the accuracy of maximum
power point tracking (MPPT) and maximal efficiency point tracking (BEPT). It was not viable, however, to regard the pump
system's subsystems as linked and interdependent subsystems throughout the design phase. Consequently, they only enhance
the MPPT's performance while ignoring the pump's BEPT's optimal operating position. Pump mapping algorithm BEPT and PV
generator fuzzy logic incremental conductance specific group optimization (FL-IC-PSO) MPPT method are implemented in this
article. In my understanding, when the BEPT control loop is started, the system runs away from the PV generator's MPP and
the power pulled from the PV generator is greater or lower than the needed power. By use of a vehicle. The pump's efficiency
has been maximized by operating in the pump's "sweet spot" (BER). For the next generation of SPVWSS, this white paper
provides the plan for optimal solar use and pumping efficiency while ensuring long-term safety. Sankar et al. (2017)Fuzzy
logic and dual MPPT controllers are used in this thesis to develop a novel digital control strategy for a photovoltaic (PV)
system. For maximum solar cell output, the PV module incorporates two MPPT controllers. Tracking the maximum output
power of the PV module is done by adjusting the DC voltage and current. In order to run at peak efficiency, MPPT technology is
used. As an astronomical two-axis solar tracker, the first MPPT controller ensures that maximum solar radiation is always
achieved. a new fuzzy logic controller (FLC) based P & O (disruption and observation) strategy is used to maintain the
system's power operating point at maximum Implementation of the second MPPT controller There is no need to worry about
any vibrations near the maximum power operating point according to the suggested control method. Reddy & Ramasamy
(2017)Based on fuzzy logic controllers, this research presented a three-phase grid-connected solar generator (FLC). By
controlling the DC link voltage, the purpose is to alter the voltage on the grid side. Self-adaptive DC link voltage regulation is
included into the design. Solar energy is extracted from the photovoltaic module using a boost converter that uses the
Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) software to power the DC link of the PV inverter. Power generated by PV inverters
may be sent into the utility grid using a VSC (Voltage Source Converter). The suggested MPPT technology has greater dynamic
performance than existing MPPT technology when the CPI voltage fluctuates quickly. MATLAB / SIMULINK was used to
simulate and verify the proposed FLC MPPT-based solar system.
IV. STANDALONE PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM COMPONENTS
 Photovoltaic cell
A photovoltaic cell is a semiconductor device that utilizes the photovoltaic effect to convert light energy into electrical energy.
To create current, electrons must be released when the photon's energy is greater than the band gap's.Photovoltaic cells, on
the other hand, are a distinct technology from photodiodes. To convert light into an electrical signal, the photodiode uses the
n-channel of a semiconductor circuit, which is forward one-sided [9].
 PV module
Many PV modules are often organized in an arrangement or parallel to satisfy energy requirements. ' PV modules of various
sizes may be affordably purchased (generally 60W to 170W). As an example, a typical small-scale desalination plant consumes
several kilowatts of electricity.
 PV modeling
A few solar cells are grouped together and connected in series to form a PV cluster. The arrangement association is
responsible for increasing the module voltage, whereas the parallel association is responsible for increasing the exhibit
current[10]. An upsetting diode and a current source are often used to depict a sun-oriented cell. It has its own set-up and
defences in place. There is a series resistance because electrons cannot travel to the n top junction and a parallel resistance
because of leakage currents.

Fig. 5: Single diode model of a PV cell
The current source (I) and diode and series resistance (R) are included in this model (Rs). When it comes to the parallel shunt
resistance (RSH), this is a non-issue.
•Boost Converter
The best power point following is primarily a problem of heap coordination, as stated in the presentation. It is necessary to use
a DC-DC converter to modify the board's information protection from matching that of the heap impediment (by changing the
obligation cycle).
Buck converters have the best efficiency, followed by buck-boosts and finally boost converters, but they are linked to the grid
or to a pump system that requires a DC-DC converter. An external boost converter is needed in order to get 230 V.
Fig. 6: Circuit diagram of a Boost Converter
Mode 1 operation of the Boost Converter
Charge is transferred from battery to inductor when the switch is closed, allowing energy to be stored. A direct charging and
discharging of a capacitor is predicted in this mode, which causes the current to rise (exponentially). Due to the diode's ability
to maintain a constant flow, the heap current may be generated by discharging the capacitor.
Fig. 7: Mode 1 operation of Boost Converter

•Mode 2 operation of the Boost Converter
Dial diodes are shorted in mode 2 (switch on). Using the inverter, the inductor's stored vitality is released and charged the
capacitor. During normal operation, the load current does not change. Figure 3.7 shows the boost converter's waveform.
Fig. 8: Mode 2 operation of Boost Converter
V. MAXIMUM POWER POINT TRACKING ALGORITHMS
5.1 An overview of Maximum Power Point Tracking
It is common for a conventional solar panel to convert 30% to 40% of the solar radiation it receives into electricity. The solar
panels' efficiency may be improved by using the latest in maximum power point tracking technology. Maximum Power
Transfer Theorem states that the circuit has the highest power output.Whenever the source impedance of the system is equal
to the load impedance. Therefore, we have an issue with impedance matching while trying to locate the maximum power
point.
Solar panels employ boost converters to increase the output voltage for a range of applications, such as motor loads, by
connecting the solar panels to boost converters. The source impedance may be matched to the load impedance by altering the
duty cycle of the boost converter.
Different MPPT techniques
A variety of ways exist for determining the moment at which maximum power is attained. Technology that has gained the
greatest traction includes:
 Observe and Be Affected (hill climbing method)
 The Incremental Conductance technique.
 Short circuit current in fractions
 a fraction of the open circuit voltage
 Networks of neurons
 Fuzzy reasoning
In order to follow the MPP, a computation must have a time-multifaceted character, cost of execution, and ease of use
necessary.
•Perturb & Observe
For the most part, P&O (perturbation and observation) are the most straightforward method. Here, a single voltage sensor is
utilized to determine the voltage of a photovoltaic (PV) array, making installation both inexpensive and simple. A tiny amount
of computation is required to run the process, but it still perturbs in both directions as it approaches the MPP, not only the
MPP. When using this technique, you must either specify the right error limits or utilize the wait function in order to avoid
running into the MPP. The algorithm's time will be slowed down as a result of this.Owing to variations in MPPT, this technique
does not account for abrupt changes in illumination levels (which are interpreted as MPP changes due to interference), and so
calculates an incorrect MPP. An incremental conductance approach may be used to prevent this issue

•Fuzzy Logic Control
The generic fuzzy logic control of MPPT has been adopted by microcontrollers in the last decade. [15] Fuzzy logic controllers
offer the benefit of processing non-linearity since they employ imprecise inputs.
•Neural Network
Microcontrollers that are neural networks may also use another method of implementing MPPT. The input, hidden layer, and
output layers of a neural network are the most common configuration. Each layer has a different number of nodes, and this
fluctuates according on the user. For example, VOC and ISC of a PV array may be entered, along with irradiance or
temperature, or any combination of these factors. One or more reference signals, such as a duty cycle signal, are often utilized
to direct the power converter to run at or near the MPP [15].
Table 1 : Characteristics of different MPPT techniques [15]
MPPT technique Convergence Implementation Periodic Sensed parameters
speed complexity tuning
Perturb & observe Varies Low No Voltage
Incremental Varies Medium No Voltage, current
conductance
Fractional Voc Medium Low Yes Voltage
Fractional Isc Medium Medium Yes Current
Fuzzy logic control Fast High Yes Varies
Neural network Fast High Yes Varies
•Perturb & Observe Algorithm
A PV panel's operational voltage is perturbed in tiny steps using the Perturb & Observe method. If the change in power P that
results is positive, the panel's oscillation will travel in the direction of the MPP. If P is negative, we must divert from the
direction of MPP and modify the sign of the disturbance provided.
Fig. 9: Solar panel characteristics showing MPP and operating points A and B [16]
Solar panel output power and module voltage may be seen in Figure 4.1, which displays the link between the two. The PV
panel's theoretical maximum output, denoted by the MPP designation, may be found at this position. Consider A and B to be
two different operational locations. A is on the left side of the MPP, as illustrated above. Because of this, it is feasible to
progress to MPP by introducing a positive voltage disturbance. However, point B is located on the left side of MPP. P will be

negative in the presence of a positive perturbation, requiring a reorientation of the perturbation in order to attain MPP. Figure
4.2 shows a flowchart of the P & O algorithm.
Limitations of Perturb & Observe algorithm
Fig. 10: Curve showing wrong tracking of MPP by P&O algorithm under rapidly atrying irradiance [16]
The MPP will shift to the right if the irradiance varies quickly. As demonstrated, the algorithm sees this as a change resulting
from a disturbance, which changes the direction of the disturbance in its following iteration.Although this approach just
requires a voltage sensor to measure the PV array voltage, it has a lower implementation cost and is easier to implement. The
algorithm has a very low time complexity, but when it gets very near to the MPP, it doesn't stay there; it's still disturbed in
both directions. When using this technique, you must either specify the right error limits or utilise the wait function in order to
avoid running into the MPP. The algorithm's time will be slowed down as a result of this.
5.2 Implementation of MPPT using a boost converter
In order to maximise the utility of solar panels, this system includes a boost converter. Switching losses will occur, however
the low voltage output will be stepped up to a higher voltage level by the boost converter when employing the converter.
Figure 4.3 depicts a high-level perspective of the necessary implementation.
Fig. 11: Requisite implementation for MPPT system

5.3 simulation work
Fig. 12: Comparison Model Fig. 13: pv1
Fig. 14: P-V Characteristics P& O Fig. 15: P-V Characteristics P& O

Fig. 16: I-V Characteristics Fig. 17: P-V Characteristics inc
Table 2: Comparison of different MPPT techniques
MPPT technique Convergence Implementation Periodic Sensed
parameters
speed complexity tuning
Perturb &Observe Varies Low No Voltage
Incremental Varies Medium No Voltage, current
Conductance
Fractional Voc Medium Low Yes Voltage
Fractional I sc Medium Medium Yes Current
Fuzzy Logic Control Fast High Yes Varies
Neural Network Fast High Yes Varies
Solar panel efficiency has increased greatly and mistakes due to fluctuations in irradiance have been removed, as illustrated in
this paper Using perturbation, observation and incremental conductance approaches decreases implementation complexity
and costs here. The graph shown in the image above shows that the planned simulation has been enhanced and the company is
doing quite well, as can be seen.
VI. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK
Simulink and MATLAB were used to create the model. An analysis of the various graphs was done. After running the
simulation in MPPT mode, the MPPT algorithm module in the circuit is bypassed for the first time. You can see that if you don't
apply the MPPT algorithm, the power available on the load side is 95 watts and the value of solar radiation is 85 watts / cm2....
In this case, PV panels may generate around 250 watts of electricity from the sun's rays. This means that the efficiency of the
conversion is quite poor. Switch to MPPT mode and run a simulation at this point The MPPT block is part of the circuit, and the
PI controller uses the P & O algorithm to figure out Vref. Under the same illumination, the PV panel continues to produce
roughly 250 watts of electricity. As a result, this photovoltaic system's overall conversion efficiency has been increased by
roughly 215 watts. Losses in the high frequency PWM switching circuit and inductance and capacitance losses in the boost
converter circuit account for the 250-watt power loss from the PV panel. Because of this, it can be observed that the efficiency
of the solar system grows by roughly 126% from an initial output power of 95 watts, culminating in an output power of 215
watts when employing the Perturb & Monitor MPPT technology. Conclusions are summarizedbelow. This paper examines and
compares several MPPT strategies that have been proposed in the literature. Research shows that in addition to MPPT, there
are several additional technologies available. Using the chart and the previous explanation, it may determine which MPPT

approach is best for the solar system.There are two reasons why the perturb and observation methods are slower than the
incremental conductance. In comparison to the Icon algorithm, the P & O implementation is easier to use. Comparisons,
integrators, and differentiators must be used in complicated circuits.
REFERENCES
1.S. Munisekhar, G. V. Marutheswar and P. Sujatha, "The Fastest MPPT Tracking Algorithm for a PV array fed BLDC Motor
Driven Air Conditioning system," 2019 Fifth International Conference on Electrical Energy Systems (ICEES), Chennai,
India, 2019, pp. 1-5. doi: 10.1109/ICEES.2019.8719321.
2.Y. Zhou, C. N. M. Ho and K. K. Siu, "A Fast PV MPPT Scheme Using Boundary Control with Second-Order Switching Surface,"
in IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 849-857, May 2019. doi: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2899470
3.S. N. Ghosh, "IBS - P&O Hybrid MPPT Algorithm for Solar PV Applications," 2019 IEEE PES GTD Grand International
Conference and Exposition Asia (GTD Asia), Bangkok, Thailand, 2019, pp. 119-123. doi:
10.1109/GTDAsia.2019.8715847
4.S. Selvakumar, M. Madhusmita, C. Koodalsamy, S. P. Simon and Y. R. Sood, "High-Speed Maximum Power Point Tracking
Module for PV Systems," in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 1119-1129, Feb. 2019.
doi: 10.1109/TIE.2018.2833036
5.Das, S. Madichetty, B. Singh and S. Mishra, "Luenberger Observer Based Current Estimated Boost Converter for PV Maximum
Power Extraction. A Current Sensorless Approach," in IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 278-286, Jan. 2019.
doi: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.2877418.
6.E. Heydari and A. Y. Varjani, "A New Variable Step-Size P&O Algorithm with Power Output and Sensorless DPC Method for
Grid-Connected PV System," 2019 10th International Power Electronics, Drive Systems and Technologies Conference
(PEDSTC), Shiraz, Iran, 2019, pp. 545-550. doi: 10.1109/PEDSTC.2019.8697651.
7.Elmelegi, M. Aly and E. M. Ahmed, "Developing Phase-Shift PWM-Based Distributed MPPT Technique for Photovoltaic
Systems," 2019 International Conference on Innovative Trends in Computer Engineering (ITCE), Aswan, Egypt, 2019,
pp. 492-497. doi: 10.1109/ITCE.2019.8646399
8.M. Farhadi-Kangarlu and M. G. Marangalu, "A Single DC-Source Five-Level Inverter Applied in Stand-Alone Photovoltaic
Systems Considering MPPT Capability," 2019 10th International Power Electronics, Drive Systems and Technologies
Conference (PEDSTC), Shiraz, Iran, 2019, pp. 338-342. doi: 10.1109/PEDSTC.2019.8697896
9.M. R. E. Dangor, M. Aswat and W. Cronje, "Flyback Converter Controlled by Model-Based Current MPPT for a Photovoltaic
Power System," 2019 Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference/Robotics and Mechatronics/Pattern
Recognition Association of South Africa (SAUPEC/RobMech/PRASA), Bloemfontein, South Africa, 2019, pp. 481-486.
doi: 10.1109/RoboMech.2019.8704756
10. Mehiri, M. Bettayeb and A. Hamid, "Fractional Nonlinear Synergetic Control based MPPT Algorithm for PV System," 2019
Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 2019,
pp. 1-5. doi: 10.1109/ICASET.2019.8714527
11. I.G. Zurbriggen and M. Ordonez, "PV Energy Harvesting Under Extremely Fast Changing Irradiance: State-Plane Direct
MPPT," in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 1852-1861, March 2019. doi:
10.1109/TIE.2018.283811
12. M. Nour Ali, "Improved Design of Artificial Neural Network for MPPT of Grid-Connected PV Systems," 2018 Twentieth
International Middle East Power Systems Conference (MEPCON), Cairo, Egypt, 2018, pp. 97-102. doi:
10.1109/MEPCON.2018.8635202
13. K. Amara et al., "Improved Performance of a PV Solar Panel with Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System ANFIS based
MPPT," 2018 7th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA), Paris, 2018, pp.
1098-1101.
doi: 10.1109/ICRERA.2018.8566818
14.W. Dengsheng, W. Lidi, H. Chuncheng, L. Tong, Z. Chenglong and L. Chenyang, "Research and Design of PV MPPT Based on
STM32," 2018 Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC), Shenyang, 2018, pp. 4971-4974. doi:
10.1109/CCDC.2018.8407992
15.W. H. Kazeza and S. P. Chowdhury, "Both Way Effects of PV Generator MPPT on BLDCM Centrifugal Pump BEPT
Performance," 2018 IEEE PES/IAS Power Africa, Cape Town, 2018, pp. 781-786. doi:
10.1109/PowerAfrica.2018.8521117
16.Y. Xue, S. Sun, J. Fei and H. Wu, "A new piecewise adaptive step MPPT algorithm for PV systems," 2017 12th IEEE
Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), Siem Reap, 2017, pp. 1652-1656. doi:
10.1109/ICIEA.2017.8283104

17.P. Nayak and A. Shaw, "Design of MPPT controllers and PV cells using MATLAB Simulink and their analysis," 2017
International Conference on Nascent Technologies in Engineering (ICNTE), Navi Mumbai, 2017, pp. 1-6. doi:
10.1109/ICNTE.2017.7947932
18.R. Patii and H. Anantwar, "Comparitive analysis of fuzzy based MPPT for buck and boost converter topologies for PV
application," 2017 International Conference On Smart Technologies For Smart Nation (SmartTechCon), Bangalore,
2017, pp. 1479-1484. doi: 10.1109/SmartTechCon.2017.8358610
19.R. Sankar, S. Velladurai, R. Rajarajan and J. A. Thulasi, "II. PV system description: Maximum power extraction in PV system
using fuzzy logic and dual MPPT control," 2017 International Conference on Energy, Communication, Data Analytics and
Soft Computing (ICECDS), Chennai, 2017, pp. 3764-3769. doi: 10.1109/ICECDS.2017.8390168
20.Reddy and S. Ramasamy, "A fuzzy logic MPPT controller based three phase grid-tied solar PV system with improved CPI
voltage," 2017 Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies (i-PACT), Vellore, 2017, pp. 1-6. doi:
10.1109/IPACT.2017.8244953
21. Coelho, R.F., Concer, F.M. and Martins, D.C. (2010) A MPPT Approach Based on Temperature Measurements Applied in PV
Systems. 2010 9th IEEE/IAS International Conference on Industry Applications (INDUSCON), São Paulo, 8-10 November
2010, 1-6.
22. Faranda, R. and Leva, S. (2008) Energy Comparison of MPPT Techniques for PV Systems. WSEAS Transactions on Power
Systems, 3, 447-455.
23. Yafaoui, A., Wu, B. and Cheung, R. (2007) Implementation of Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithm for Residenial
Photovoltaic Systems. 2nd Canadian Solar Buildings Conference, Calgary, 10-14 June 2007.
24. Sera, D., Kerekes, T., Teodorescu, R. and Blaabjerg, F. (2006) Improved MPPT Method for Rapidly Changing
Environmental
25. Conditions. 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, 2, 1420-
1425.http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISIE.2006.295680
26. Lee, J.H., Bae, H. and Cho, B.H. (2006) Advanced Incremental Conductance MPPT Algorithm with a Variable Step Size. 12th
International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference, EPE-PEMC 2006, Portoroz, 30 August-1 September
2006, 603-607.
27. Dorofte, C., Borup, U. and Blaabjerg, F. (2005) A Combined Two-Method MPPT Control Scheme for Grid-Connected
Photovoltaic Systems. 2005 European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications, Dresden, 11-14 September
2005, 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EPE.2005.219714
28. Femia, N., Petrone, G., Spagnuolo, G. and Vitelli, M. (2005) Optimization of Perturb and Observe Maximum Power Point
Tracking Method. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 20, 963-973. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2005.850975
29. Liu, C., Wu, B. and Cheung, R. (2004) Advanced Algorithm for MPPT Control of Photovoltaic Systems. Canadian Solar
Buildings Conference, Montreal, 20-24 August 2004.

Optimization of PV Cell through MPPT Algorithm

More Related Content

Similar to Optimization of PV Cell through MPPT Algorithm

More from IRJET Journal

Recently uploaded

Optimization of PV Cell through MPPT Algorithm