Op#Fer® is economical because..
•  With a dosage of one or two tablets once
per day heme iron therapy is economical
compared to the alterna#ves.
•  Dosage will stay the same even over
longer therapy.
Price per day is comparable with other products
•  There are considerably less poten#ally
therapy-ruining side-effects. 
•  This is a major problem when it comes to non-
heme iron supplements. It is very common
that side effects force the therapy to be
terminated and something else tried. 
•  The last alterna#ve when nothing else works is
very expensive and inconvenient intravenously
given iron since iron is absolutely vital to life. 
No failed therapies
•  One or two tablets at a single administra#on
per day steals no working #me. It is also
convenient in other ways. 
•  There are no special precau#ons over
simultaneously ingested food, drink or
medicine.
Easy dosage once per day
•  Heme-iron therapy can build up adequate iron
storage in a natural and gentle fashion. There
is no change in tolerability or efficacy over
longer #me. 
•  With non-heme supplements side-effects are
usually, even aMer ini#al good tolerance, slowly
accumula#ng un#l the therapy has to be
discon#nued.
Efficacy and tolerance will not change over #me
•  Using heme iron very liOle is wasted. 
•  What is not taken up is completely inert in the
gastro-intes#nal channel as opposed to non-
absorbed free iron ions from non-heme iron,
which are reac#ve and strongly irrita#ng.
Efficient: Uptake 25 %+ vs 2-3 % for non-heme iron
•  For MediTec it is more important to help as
many iron deficiency sufferers worldwide as
possible than op#mising product calculus. 
•  We are looking to reach large markets, not
least in the third world.
The philosophy of MediTec is that market share is
preferred to profit

OptiFer@ is economical

  • 1.
  • 2.
    •  With adosage of one or two tablets once per day heme iron therapy is economical compared to the alterna#ves. •  Dosage will stay the same even over longer therapy. Price per day is comparable with other products
  • 3.
    •  There areconsiderably less poten#ally therapy-ruining side-effects. •  This is a major problem when it comes to non- heme iron supplements. It is very common that side effects force the therapy to be terminated and something else tried. •  The last alterna#ve when nothing else works is very expensive and inconvenient intravenously given iron since iron is absolutely vital to life. No failed therapies
  • 4.
    •  One ortwo tablets at a single administra#on per day steals no working #me. It is also convenient in other ways. •  There are no special precau#ons over simultaneously ingested food, drink or medicine. Easy dosage once per day
  • 5.
    •  Heme-iron therapycan build up adequate iron storage in a natural and gentle fashion. There is no change in tolerability or efficacy over longer #me. •  With non-heme supplements side-effects are usually, even aMer ini#al good tolerance, slowly accumula#ng un#l the therapy has to be discon#nued. Efficacy and tolerance will not change over #me
  • 6.
    •  Using hemeiron very liOle is wasted. •  What is not taken up is completely inert in the gastro-intes#nal channel as opposed to non- absorbed free iron ions from non-heme iron, which are reac#ve and strongly irrita#ng. Efficient: Uptake 25 %+ vs 2-3 % for non-heme iron
  • 7.
    •  For MediTecit is more important to help as many iron deficiency sufferers worldwide as possible than op#mising product calculus. •  We are looking to reach large markets, not least in the third world. The philosophy of MediTec is that market share is preferred to profit