The document discusses the Opposing Viewpoints in Context database as an alternative to the SIRS Issues Researcher database for student research. It notes that Opposing Viewpoints has a more user-friendly homepage that efficiently guides students through narrowing down topics within broader categories. While familiar with SIRS, the author feels Opposing Viewpoints leads students more efficiently to credible and relevant information through features like browsing issues, searching, and viewing current news and multimedia topics. Both databases allow for similar research processes and utilizing saved materials for citations.

1. Opposing Viewpoints in Context: Pioneer Argument Database Review
When the district removed SIRS Issues Researcher from the Pioneer offerings, I was
initially disappointed. Argument writing is a primary focus in secondary English classes.
Therefore, it’s critical for students to have access to materials for argument units and
assignments. When students randomly browse the internet for particular topics, it’s like looking
in the ocean for a specific fish. However, databases present narrowed topics in useable formats,
so students need only search a “pond” for the fish they seek. SIRS has been an efficient place to
research argument topics. I have appreciated the features of the site, as students can browse
current (top ten) topics, wider subject categories, search by the alphabetical topics page, or
utilize advanced search operators to narrow topics further. SIRS also allows users to save
articles and create bibliographies in MLA and APA formats.
Ray Hunter, our library media specialist, suggested I browse the Opposing Viewpoints in
Context site—one of our available Pioneer databases. Though I had not visited the site
previously, I find it to be similar to SIRS, and perhaps even more user-friendly for younger
researchers. The home page provides category listings that propel the narrowing process.
Students can select wider areas of interest (Business and Economics, Energy and Environment,
Health and Medicine, Law and Politics, and a variety of others ) and then browse topics within
the larger topic. When one hones in a topic category, subtopics lead users to more specific
offerings. Afterward, the database lists further categories that specify information types, such
as magazine and journal articles, new articles, videos, statistics, etc… This format enables users
to include different types of information—and utilize various citation formats when creating
reference pages. The features readily guide students toward more thorough research.
I might like the Opposing Viewpoints home page better than SIRS (which I don’t have to
compare this one to, presently), because the categories page is within the home page, whereas
SIRS topic categories page is a separate feature. I feel that the Opposing Viewpoints topics page
will steer students toward topic sooner, as there are fewer site distractions than on the SIRS
homepage. Students using Opposing Viewpoints can choose the BROWSE ISSUES feature, which
is similar to the SIRS A-Z listing. The searching feature allows for Boolean operators and the
sidebar features offer current news, commentary, and multi-media topics that provide
politically significant information. Opposing Viewpoints lists topic results by the most current to
the least, while SIRS requires advanced operators that narrow date fields. I feel the Opposing
Viewpoints database leads students more efficiently to credible data that is also relevant. The
SEARCH HISTORY feature assists users in moving forward or backward through research, so
users don’t lose their places while wandering.
Each site allows for similar processes that ease searching, saving material for continued
use, and utilizing data for citation purposes. Though I’m more familiar with SIRS Issues
Researcher, I feel the Opposing Viewpoints site has merit and may be a good substitute.
Angie Bulloch, Snowcrest Jr. High School