Presentazione del libro del Consiglio italiano per le Scienze Sociali (CSS) per capire e rilanciare l’Italia Sono soldi ben spesi? Perché e come valutare l’efficacia delle politiche pubbliche
This was presented in the "rapporteur session" of the international conference on Evaluation and accountability in education held in Rome, 3-5 October 2012.
Full papers of the conference are posted here: http://www.invalsi.it/invalsi/ri/improving_education/
The paper aims at exploring the consequences of the gradually increasing availability of Open Data for evaluation as we know it. Using concepts from the literature on evaluation and democracy, it contends that new technologies both require a new behavior by evaluators and open up possibilities in the very framework in which evaluation is done.
The pressure to open up data changes the way governments and public sector offices conceptualize, produce, and disseminate data. Responding to this demand requires that internal procedures change in fundamental, still partially unexplored ways.
Issues arise also for citizens seeking information. They face a rapid growth of internet-based sources, which both creates opportunities for research and difficulties in assessing data quality, credibility, and usability.
It also implies that public interventions--be they programmes, projects, or services--are open to public scrutiny of a new, more informed type. It increasingly involves expert, non-expert, and differently-expert scrutiny.
It is highly unlikely that Open Data will ever provide all--or even most--information needed for an evaluation. There is a risk that, in addition to opening up new research avenues and framing new evaluation questions by new actors, the availability of great masses of data on public policies obscures the need to directly observe effects and to build credible theories about phenomena.
The very existence of open data, and the possibilities they open up to public scrutiny call into question the role of internal and external evaluators. This is even more so when thinking of the opportunities opened by the ability to conjure collective intelligence in evaluation processes--using concepts already developed in the participation tradition.
The paper explores these themes based on an on-going research project. The two authors are involved in the Open Data movement in Italy and will advance their research during the next months through their work, research on existing literature, and holding workshops (e.g. within the Sapienza Seminar on Classic Evaluation Theorists).
10th EES Biennial Conference
Per l'Open Data Day 2014
Usare gli open data di OpenCoesione per fare società civile, per esercitare controllo sulle attività delle amministrazioni e dei governi, per vedere da vicino in cosa si trasformano le risorse pubbliche, per aiutarci a capire quello che da soli i dati disponibili non ci dicono.
Llanciare in ogni città una maratona di monitoraggio dei progetti finanziati dalle politiche europee e ascoltare/leggere/vedere le storie dei maratoneti su Monithon.it!
Ne abbiamo discusso con tutti gli interessati all’evento “hub” di Roma il 22 febbraio 2014, collegandoci in remoto con i “Monithon in corso” nelle varie città.
Presentazione del libro del Consiglio italiano per le Scienze Sociali (CSS) per capire e rilanciare l’Italia Sono soldi ben spesi? Perché e come valutare l’efficacia delle politiche pubbliche
This was presented in the "rapporteur session" of the international conference on Evaluation and accountability in education held in Rome, 3-5 October 2012.
Full papers of the conference are posted here: http://www.invalsi.it/invalsi/ri/improving_education/
The paper aims at exploring the consequences of the gradually increasing availability of Open Data for evaluation as we know it. Using concepts from the literature on evaluation and democracy, it contends that new technologies both require a new behavior by evaluators and open up possibilities in the very framework in which evaluation is done.
The pressure to open up data changes the way governments and public sector offices conceptualize, produce, and disseminate data. Responding to this demand requires that internal procedures change in fundamental, still partially unexplored ways.
Issues arise also for citizens seeking information. They face a rapid growth of internet-based sources, which both creates opportunities for research and difficulties in assessing data quality, credibility, and usability.
It also implies that public interventions--be they programmes, projects, or services--are open to public scrutiny of a new, more informed type. It increasingly involves expert, non-expert, and differently-expert scrutiny.
It is highly unlikely that Open Data will ever provide all--or even most--information needed for an evaluation. There is a risk that, in addition to opening up new research avenues and framing new evaluation questions by new actors, the availability of great masses of data on public policies obscures the need to directly observe effects and to build credible theories about phenomena.
The very existence of open data, and the possibilities they open up to public scrutiny call into question the role of internal and external evaluators. This is even more so when thinking of the opportunities opened by the ability to conjure collective intelligence in evaluation processes--using concepts already developed in the participation tradition.
The paper explores these themes based on an on-going research project. The two authors are involved in the Open Data movement in Italy and will advance their research during the next months through their work, research on existing literature, and holding workshops (e.g. within the Sapienza Seminar on Classic Evaluation Theorists).
10th EES Biennial Conference
Per l'Open Data Day 2014
Usare gli open data di OpenCoesione per fare società civile, per esercitare controllo sulle attività delle amministrazioni e dei governi, per vedere da vicino in cosa si trasformano le risorse pubbliche, per aiutarci a capire quello che da soli i dati disponibili non ci dicono.
Llanciare in ogni città una maratona di monitoraggio dei progetti finanziati dalle politiche europee e ascoltare/leggere/vedere le storie dei maratoneti su Monithon.it!
Ne abbiamo discusso con tutti gli interessati all’evento “hub” di Roma il 22 febbraio 2014, collegandoci in remoto con i “Monithon in corso” nelle varie città.
Verso una Spatial Data Science Seminario 29-11-2017Giuliana Bonello
Intervento "Verso una Spatial Data Science:
mixare nuovi e vecchi dati, usare nuovi e vecchi approcci, unire competenze" nel seminario del 23/11/217 "ARCHIVIAZIONE, DISSEMINAZIONE E RIUSO DEI DATI:
A CHE PUNTO SIAMO?" presso c/o Campus Luigi Einaudi, Torino
Il CSST regionale a supporto dello sviluppo dei Centri Servizi Territoriali Veneti/A.L.I.
Villa Cordellina Montecchio Maggiore Vicenza - 21 gennaio 2008
Verso una Spatial Data Science Seminario 29-11-2017Giuliana Bonello
Intervento "Verso una Spatial Data Science:
mixare nuovi e vecchi dati, usare nuovi e vecchi approcci, unire competenze" nel seminario del 23/11/217 "ARCHIVIAZIONE, DISSEMINAZIONE E RIUSO DEI DATI:
A CHE PUNTO SIAMO?" presso c/o Campus Luigi Einaudi, Torino
Il CSST regionale a supporto dello sviluppo dei Centri Servizi Territoriali Veneti/A.L.I.
Villa Cordellina Montecchio Maggiore Vicenza - 21 gennaio 2008
I beni confiscati nelle politiche di coesione e nei progetti di OpenCoesione
OpenCoesione Backstage
1. www. .gov.it
BACKSTAGE
Raduno SOD
Bologna, 18 gennaio 2013
2.
3. 589.966 progetti decisi o in corso
55,8 mld euro assegnati o spesi
circa 46 mila soggetti censiti
“…dall’ago al reattore”
(ovunque in Italia, in qls settore, di qls dimensione)
10. troppi numeri, troppo complessi, che raccontano /
troppe storie (e forse nemmeno una per intero) /
troppo lavoro e troppa “monnezza” / troppi costi
11. più info, più dati!
risposte alle (infinite) domande …
maggiore interazione con gli utenti
cosa manca... secondo noi