War crimes are serious violations of international humanitarian law that are committed during armed conflict. Examples include murder of civilians, torture of prisoners of war, and wanton destruction of cities. The concept of war crimes was first codified in the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907, and further developed after World War II through bodies like the Nuremberg Trials. Individuals can be held criminally responsible for war crimes, including military commanders and heads of state.
WAR OF AGGRESSION - Wikipedia - HIGHLIGHTEDVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
KEEP IN MIND, THE LIES THE UNITED STATES’ DESPOT TOLD ABOUT IRAQ PRESIDENT SADDAM HUSSEIN HAVING “WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION!” That was a LIE! MERELY “VERBAL” ACCUSATIONS.
IMPORTANT TO NOTE: The United States’ DESPOT DEMANDS that Foreign Governments/Nations-Of-Color DESTROY their CHEMICAL WEAPONS; however, the United States’ DESPOT has an ARSENAL of Chemical Weapons that is USES and a HISTORY of ENGAGING in GENOCIDAL Practices:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/040717-united-states-list-of-chemical-weapons-of-mass-destruction
DOES it make sense that Foreign Governments have been required to DESTROY their CHEMICAL WEAPONS and then the NO.1 WHITE Jews/Zionists and WHITE Supremacists’ UNITED STATES’ DESPOT is ALLOWED to keep theirs and USE THEM in Wars they are LOSING – i.e. as in SYRIA.
PRIMA FACIE REQUIREMENT FOR WAR OF AGGRESSION
A) On or about Thursday, April 6, 2017, the United States' DESPOTISM Government Regime DECLARED a "WAR OF AGGRESSION" upon the State of SYRIA, its Government and Citizens. This attack was PLANNED, ORGANIZED and CARRIED OUT under the DIRECTION and LEADERSHIP of the United States' DESPOT's President Donald Trump.
B) On or about 04/06/17, the United States' DESPOT INVADED by its Armed Forces/Miliary WITHOUT a "DECLARATION OF WAR" the "SOVEREIGN" Territory of ANOTHER State (Syria).
C) On or about Thursday, 04/06/17, the United States' DESPOT by its Land/Naval/Air Forces WITHOUT a "DECLARATION OF WAR" ATTACKED the SOVEREIGN Government of Syria and Territories which INCLUDED Syrian Airfield(s)/Bases.
D) The United States' DESPOT's Government and its Military are engaging in CONSPIRACIES targeting the BLOCKADING of Syrian Ports, etc.
E) The United States' DESPOT has been REPORTED ARMING and SUPPORTING the Terrorists on Syria soil for PURPOSES of OVERTHROWING the Syrian Regime and ALLOWING for the United States' DESPOT's WHITE Jews/Zionists and WHITE Supremacists to TAKE control of the Syrian Government and its Resources. The 04/06/17 attack IS a DIRECT AGGRESSIVE WAR Act for purposes of providing the United States' DESPOT and its Terrorist Groups with the UPPER hand in a CIVIL War in which it is LOSING!
We look forward to using this information in the 04/10/17 PUBLIC NEWS RELEASE.
Please feel free to visit our Joomla Website at: www.vogeldenisenewsome.net
At the end of World War II, the Allied powers sought to bring those responsible for the Holocaust and World War II atrocities to justice. Low-level offenders were tried by court-martial, while Germans who primarily committed crimes in foreign countries would be tried in those countries.
INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW ENGLISH-BURMESE VERSIONMYO AUNG Myanmar
What is international humanitarian law?
Legal factsheet31 DECEMBER 2014
Fact sheet providing a summary description of the sources, content and field of application of international humanitarian law.
International humanitarian law is a set of rules which seek, for humanitarian reasons, to limit the effects of armed conflict. It protects persons who are not or are no longer participating in the hostilities and restricts the means and methods of warfare. International humanitarian law is also known as the law of war or the law of armed conflict.
International humanitarian law is part of international law, which is the body of rules governing relations between States. International law is contained in agreements between States – treaties or conventions –, in customary rules, which consist of State practise considered by them as legally binding, and in general principles.
International humanitarian law applies to armed conflicts. It does not regulate whether a State may actually use force; this is governed by an important, but distinct, part of international law set out in the United Nations Charter.
https://www.icrc.org/en/document/what-international-humanitarian-law
https://www.facebook.com/zin.linn.9/posts/10208644837335021?pnref=story
WAR OF AGGRESSION - Wikipedia - HIGHLIGHTEDVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
KEEP IN MIND, THE LIES THE UNITED STATES’ DESPOT TOLD ABOUT IRAQ PRESIDENT SADDAM HUSSEIN HAVING “WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION!” That was a LIE! MERELY “VERBAL” ACCUSATIONS.
IMPORTANT TO NOTE: The United States’ DESPOT DEMANDS that Foreign Governments/Nations-Of-Color DESTROY their CHEMICAL WEAPONS; however, the United States’ DESPOT has an ARSENAL of Chemical Weapons that is USES and a HISTORY of ENGAGING in GENOCIDAL Practices:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/040717-united-states-list-of-chemical-weapons-of-mass-destruction
DOES it make sense that Foreign Governments have been required to DESTROY their CHEMICAL WEAPONS and then the NO.1 WHITE Jews/Zionists and WHITE Supremacists’ UNITED STATES’ DESPOT is ALLOWED to keep theirs and USE THEM in Wars they are LOSING – i.e. as in SYRIA.
PRIMA FACIE REQUIREMENT FOR WAR OF AGGRESSION
A) On or about Thursday, April 6, 2017, the United States' DESPOTISM Government Regime DECLARED a "WAR OF AGGRESSION" upon the State of SYRIA, its Government and Citizens. This attack was PLANNED, ORGANIZED and CARRIED OUT under the DIRECTION and LEADERSHIP of the United States' DESPOT's President Donald Trump.
B) On or about 04/06/17, the United States' DESPOT INVADED by its Armed Forces/Miliary WITHOUT a "DECLARATION OF WAR" the "SOVEREIGN" Territory of ANOTHER State (Syria).
C) On or about Thursday, 04/06/17, the United States' DESPOT by its Land/Naval/Air Forces WITHOUT a "DECLARATION OF WAR" ATTACKED the SOVEREIGN Government of Syria and Territories which INCLUDED Syrian Airfield(s)/Bases.
D) The United States' DESPOT's Government and its Military are engaging in CONSPIRACIES targeting the BLOCKADING of Syrian Ports, etc.
E) The United States' DESPOT has been REPORTED ARMING and SUPPORTING the Terrorists on Syria soil for PURPOSES of OVERTHROWING the Syrian Regime and ALLOWING for the United States' DESPOT's WHITE Jews/Zionists and WHITE Supremacists to TAKE control of the Syrian Government and its Resources. The 04/06/17 attack IS a DIRECT AGGRESSIVE WAR Act for purposes of providing the United States' DESPOT and its Terrorist Groups with the UPPER hand in a CIVIL War in which it is LOSING!
We look forward to using this information in the 04/10/17 PUBLIC NEWS RELEASE.
Please feel free to visit our Joomla Website at: www.vogeldenisenewsome.net
At the end of World War II, the Allied powers sought to bring those responsible for the Holocaust and World War II atrocities to justice. Low-level offenders were tried by court-martial, while Germans who primarily committed crimes in foreign countries would be tried in those countries.
INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW ENGLISH-BURMESE VERSIONMYO AUNG Myanmar
What is international humanitarian law?
Legal factsheet31 DECEMBER 2014
Fact sheet providing a summary description of the sources, content and field of application of international humanitarian law.
International humanitarian law is a set of rules which seek, for humanitarian reasons, to limit the effects of armed conflict. It protects persons who are not or are no longer participating in the hostilities and restricts the means and methods of warfare. International humanitarian law is also known as the law of war or the law of armed conflict.
International humanitarian law is part of international law, which is the body of rules governing relations between States. International law is contained in agreements between States – treaties or conventions –, in customary rules, which consist of State practise considered by them as legally binding, and in general principles.
International humanitarian law applies to armed conflicts. It does not regulate whether a State may actually use force; this is governed by an important, but distinct, part of international law set out in the United Nations Charter.
https://www.icrc.org/en/document/what-international-humanitarian-law
https://www.facebook.com/zin.linn.9/posts/10208644837335021?pnref=story
Emergency Surgery Workshop Davos 2011: Presentation by Prof Jürg Kesselring, MD, Member of the International Committee of the Red Cross ICRC, Valens, Switzerland
now a days i researching about new means and method of warfare with taking and observing the international experts opinions and analysis, as this world is achieving and inventing more effective and dangerous weapon and way of projectile these new weapon which becoming the serious threat to human life, not just human but these new full of technology weapon and methods are enough to destroy entire world .
A Critically Analysis of the Doctrine of Use of Force by States under Interna...Onyekachi Duru Esq
The purpose of this presentation is to provide a clear statement, assessment and critical analysis of the rules of international law governing the use of force by states.
International Humanitarian Law Debate Championship 2016Terence Aaron
These are the motion, context and information slides for the International Humanitarian Law Debate Championship 2016.
Adjudication Core: Banun Sabri (IIUM/International Islamic University of Malaysia), Terence Aaron (UT MARA/University of Technology MARA) and Leeroy Ting Kah Sing (UM/ University of Malaya)
Dates: 9-11 December
If you have any questions on the slides, feel free to forward
Obama read my lips -obama fraudgate (gujarati)VogelDenise
તેથી અમેરિકા યુનાઈટેડ સ્ટેટ્સ ઑફ તરીકે દેશમાં, કેવી રીતે બે કુંટુંબો (ક્લિન્ટન અને બુશ) છે અને તેમના વકીલો / એટર્ની (બેકર ડોનેલ્સન Bearman કેલ્ડવેલ અને Berkowitz) સત્તામાં રહેવા માટે માન્ય, સરકાર બળજબરીથી હરણ કરવું અને નેશન્સ (સ્થાનિક અને વિદેશી) ધાકધમકીથી કામ લેવું અને સિટિઝન્સ જેમ કે આતંકવાદી કૃત્યો કરવા માટે બાન પકડી? વ્હાઈટ હાઉસ તેમના પિતરાઇ (બરાક ઓબામા) સાથે - હવે જેમ કે આતંકવાદી રેજીમ્સ ઉથલાવી પાડવા માટે સમય છે: http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/gujarati-040412
હા, અમેરિકા વિરુદ્ધ ચીન સંઘર્ષ યુનાઈટેડ સ્ટેટ્સ યુનાઇટેડ અમેરિકા ભ્રષ્ટ સરકારી અધિકારીઓ રાજ્યો અને ચીનના નેતાઓ દ્વારા આયોજીત રમત તમામ એક ભાગ છે - એટલે કે આ દસ્તાવેજમાં બેકર દ્વારા આયોજીત ડેમોક્રેટ વિરુદ્ધ રિપબ્લિકન કૌભાંડમાં ની છેતરપિંડી બતાવ્યા ડોનેલ્સન અને તેમના કાવતરાખોરો / સાથી કાવતરાખોરો!
આસ્થાપૂર્વક, આ દસ્તાવેજ "મોનોપોલીઝ" પ્રતિબંધિત અને ગેરકાયદે છે કેમ રિમાઇન્ડર તરીકે સેવા આપશે! અમેરિકા યુનાઇટેડ સ્ટેટ્સ કેવી રીતે આર્થિક અને નાણાકીય સંકુચિત તરફ દોરી જાય છે, જે આંતરરાષ્ટ્રીય સરકારો અને નાણાકીય સંસ્થાઓ એકાધિકાર મેળવવા પ્રયાસ કર્યો!
Emergency Surgery Workshop Davos 2011: Presentation by Prof Jürg Kesselring, MD, Member of the International Committee of the Red Cross ICRC, Valens, Switzerland
now a days i researching about new means and method of warfare with taking and observing the international experts opinions and analysis, as this world is achieving and inventing more effective and dangerous weapon and way of projectile these new weapon which becoming the serious threat to human life, not just human but these new full of technology weapon and methods are enough to destroy entire world .
A Critically Analysis of the Doctrine of Use of Force by States under Interna...Onyekachi Duru Esq
The purpose of this presentation is to provide a clear statement, assessment and critical analysis of the rules of international law governing the use of force by states.
International Humanitarian Law Debate Championship 2016Terence Aaron
These are the motion, context and information slides for the International Humanitarian Law Debate Championship 2016.
Adjudication Core: Banun Sabri (IIUM/International Islamic University of Malaysia), Terence Aaron (UT MARA/University of Technology MARA) and Leeroy Ting Kah Sing (UM/ University of Malaya)
Dates: 9-11 December
If you have any questions on the slides, feel free to forward
Obama read my lips -obama fraudgate (gujarati)VogelDenise
તેથી અમેરિકા યુનાઈટેડ સ્ટેટ્સ ઑફ તરીકે દેશમાં, કેવી રીતે બે કુંટુંબો (ક્લિન્ટન અને બુશ) છે અને તેમના વકીલો / એટર્ની (બેકર ડોનેલ્સન Bearman કેલ્ડવેલ અને Berkowitz) સત્તામાં રહેવા માટે માન્ય, સરકાર બળજબરીથી હરણ કરવું અને નેશન્સ (સ્થાનિક અને વિદેશી) ધાકધમકીથી કામ લેવું અને સિટિઝન્સ જેમ કે આતંકવાદી કૃત્યો કરવા માટે બાન પકડી? વ્હાઈટ હાઉસ તેમના પિતરાઇ (બરાક ઓબામા) સાથે - હવે જેમ કે આતંકવાદી રેજીમ્સ ઉથલાવી પાડવા માટે સમય છે: http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/gujarati-040412
હા, અમેરિકા વિરુદ્ધ ચીન સંઘર્ષ યુનાઈટેડ સ્ટેટ્સ યુનાઇટેડ અમેરિકા ભ્રષ્ટ સરકારી અધિકારીઓ રાજ્યો અને ચીનના નેતાઓ દ્વારા આયોજીત રમત તમામ એક ભાગ છે - એટલે કે આ દસ્તાવેજમાં બેકર દ્વારા આયોજીત ડેમોક્રેટ વિરુદ્ધ રિપબ્લિકન કૌભાંડમાં ની છેતરપિંડી બતાવ્યા ડોનેલ્સન અને તેમના કાવતરાખોરો / સાથી કાવતરાખોરો!
આસ્થાપૂર્વક, આ દસ્તાવેજ "મોનોપોલીઝ" પ્રતિબંધિત અને ગેરકાયદે છે કેમ રિમાઇન્ડર તરીકે સેવા આપશે! અમેરિકા યુનાઇટેડ સ્ટેટ્સ કેવી રીતે આર્થિક અને નાણાકીય સંકુચિત તરફ દોરી જાય છે, જે આંતરરાષ્ટ્રીય સરકારો અને નાણાકીય સંસ્થાઓ એકાધિકાર મેળવવા પ્રયાસ કર્યો!
04/14/13 PUBLIC NOTICE (03/11/13 FAX TO BARACK OBAMA) - czechVogelDenise
Tento dokument je návrh dokument (y), které jsou připravovány pro překlady: GRATULUJEME do Egypta, ukazuje světu, jak je demokracie má fungovat přes Revolutionary proces a svržení TERORISTICKÝM režimy - prostě říct "ne" miliardový BLOOD THE peněz SPOJENÉ STÁTY AMERICKÉ platí, aby jeho teroristické buňky kořeny v Blízkého východu a nepokoje!
Pro ty, kteří může být právě k nám v na following věci Trayvon Martin, stejně jako ostatní RACIST / bílého rasistu Acts zahrnující Spojené státy americké vládě je, doufejme, že bude tyto informace vrhnout více světla, o trestním jednání a korupce TOP / klíčových pracovníků ve Spojených státech amerických teroristický režim, který, zdá se, vést soukromý advokátní kancelář Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz - tedy zodpovědný za exekutiva / Americký prezident Barack Obama / Hillary a Bill Clinton / George W. Bush a George HW Bush. . ., Moc zákonodárná, soudní Členové Branč / Nejvyšší soud Spojených států a mnohé další z jeho rasistických kohort / teroristické buňky. Stejně jako se zdá, Spojené státy teroristický režim Ameriky byl za rámování bratrů (Dzhokhar a tamerlan TSARNAEV) pro Boston bombových útoků MARATHON a pak se chladnokrevné vraždě Dzhokhar v úsilí o zakrývání své rasistické PRAKTIK, aby jim TALKING, George Zimmerman ohledu na to, zdá se týká jedné ze Spojených států amerických je teroristický režim'S Stážisté! Doufáme, že najdete tento dokument vzdělávacích a informačních a předat jej žádné další osobě tak, že jsou si vědomi toho, co se děje, proč je důležité, aby se Spojené státy americké ZE ZAHRANIČNÍCH VĚCÍ!
Hodláme také použít Trayvon MARTIN Trial podporovat, jak Spojené státy amerického prezidenta Baracka Obamy a jeho právní tým S PODPOROU Kongresu používá vládní zdroje - tedy, jak se zdá, to udělali v domácím teroristických útoků z 11. září 2001, 11.09.2012 Benghází útoky, 15.dubna 2013 Bostonský maraton bombových útoků. . . - Zahájení WARS za účelem vzdělávání svých bílého rasistu chráněnci / Members:
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/czech-040412
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/czech-11788910
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/obama-us-wars-used-to-train-white-supremacist-czech
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/072712-usa-ku-klux-klan-runned-government-czech
GEORGE ZIMMERMAN'S RE-ENACTMENT (galician)VogelDenise
ESTE DOCUMENTO UN PROXECTO DE DOCUMENTO (S) preparado para TRADUCIÓN: Parabéns a Exipto en mostrar ao mundo como a democracia é suposta para traballar co proceso revolucionario e derrubar réximes terroristas - Só diga "non" ao sangue cláusulas bilionária do Estados Unidos de América está pagando para manter a súa células terroristas enraizada no Oriente Medio e da axitación!
Para aqueles que poden ser só unirse a nós no seguinte do Martin tema Trayvon, así como a outros supremacía racista / WHITE actos que impliquen a Estados Unidos de Goberno de América, espero, a seguinte información pode botar luz sobre o comportamento criminal e corrupción de altos funcionarios / KEY nos Estados Unidos do réxime terrorista de EEUU que aparece está liderado polo sector privado bufete de avogados Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz - ie Counsel ao Poder Executivo / Presidente Obama / Clinton e Bill Clinton / George W. Bush e George HW Bush. . ., O Poder Lexislativo, membros do XUDICIAL BRANC / Tribunal Supremo dos Estados Unidos e moitos outros dos seus compañeiros racistas / células terroristas. Así como aparece nos Estados Unidos de réxime terrorista de EEUU estaba detrás o encadramento dos irmáns (Dzhokhar e Tamerlán TSARNAEV) para a Maratón de atentados Boston e, a continuación, o asasinato a sangue frío de Dzhokhar nos esforzos para encubrir as súas prácticas racistas para perder los de Falar, o asunto George Zimmerman parece implica un dos Estados Unidos de estagiários terrorista do réxime de América! Esperamos que ache este documento educativo e informativo e pasala para os outros, para que estean conscientes do que está a suceder por que é importante para os Estados Unidos de América FÓRA de Asuntos Exteriores!
Pretendemos utilizar o Trayvon MARTIN Proba de Asistencia Como os Estados Unidos do presidente de EEUU Barack Obama eo seu equipo xurídico, co apoio do Congreso utiliza recursos do goberno - é dicir, como parece que fixeron nos ataques terrorista doméstico en 11 de setembro de 2001, 11 setembro de 2012 Bengasi ataques, 15 de abril de 2013 Maratón de Boston bombardeos. . . - Para comezar WARS para efectos de formación da supremacía seus protexidos / membros brancos:
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/galician-040412
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/galician
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/obama-us-wars-used-to-train-white-supremacist-galician
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/072712-usa-ku-klux-klan-runned-government-galician
veryday tasks in better or more convenient ways. For example, OpenTable.
com is a website that allows users to make restaurant reservations online and
now covers most of the United States. If you’re planning a trip to Boston, for
example, you can access OpenTable.com, select the area of the city you’ll be
visiting, and view descriptions, reviews, customer ratings, and in most cases
the menus of the restaurants in the area. You can then make a reservation at
the restaurant and print a map and the directions to it. The basic tasks that
OpenTable.com helps people perform have always been done: looking for a
restaurant, comparing prices and menus, soliciting advice from people who are
familiar with competing restaurants, and getting directions. What OpenTable.
com does is help people perform these tasks in a more convenient and expedi-
ent manner.
Another aspect of technological advances is that once a technology is cre-
ated, products often emerge to advance it. For example, the creation of the
Apple iPod, iPhone, iPad, and similar devices has in turned spawned entire
industries that produce compatible devices. For example, Rokit is a high-end
mobile accessories company that makes smartphone cases, headphones,
portable USB device chargers and Bluetooth speakers. Rokit wouldn’t exist
if it weren’t for the advent of the smartphone industry. Similarly, there are
a growing number of start-ups working on smartphone apps. An example is
Ubersense, the subject of the You Be the VC 5.2 feature. Ubersense has made
a smartphone and tablet app that allows athletes, coaches, and parents to
shoot video of an athlete’s move or competition, and then analyze the video in
a variety of ways.
Political Action and regulatory Changes Political and regulatory
changes also provide the basis for business ideas. For example, new laws often
spur start-ups that are launched to take advantage of their specifications. This
is currently happening as a result of the passage of the Affordable Care Act
(Obamacare). The combination of new regulations, incentitives for doctors and
hospitals to shift to electronic records, and the release of mountains of data held
by the Department of Health and Human Services (on topics such as hospital
quality and nursing home patient satisfaction), is motivating entrepreneurs to
launch electronic medical records start-ups, apps to help patients monitor their
medications, and similar companies.9
On some occassions, entire industries hinge on whether certain govern-
ment regulations evolve in a manner that is favorable to the industry. For ex-
ample, there are several start-ups poised to commercialize the use of drones,
or Aerial UAV’s. Drones can be used for a number of domestic purposes, such
as helping farmers determine the optimal level of fertilizer to place on crops
or helping filmmakers shoot overhead scenes. Amazon.com created quite a bit
of buzz in late 2013 when it suggested it would like to use drones for package
delivery. As of spring 2014
Excited to share Module 2 of my lecture series on International Criminal Law, where we dive deep into the historic Nuremberg Trials and their profound impact on shaping the foundations of international criminal law. 🌍
Join me as we uncover Nuremberg's principal contribution towards the criminalization of aggression in international law, a milestone that continues to shape the global legal landscape.
Stay tuned for a fascinating exploration of how history has shaped the course of international justice! 📚
31052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
role of women and girls in various terror groupssadiakorobi2
Women have three distinct types of involvement: direct involvement in terrorist acts; enabling of others to commit such acts; and facilitating the disengagement of others from violent or extremist groups.
‘वोटर्स विल मस्ट प्रीवेल’ (मतदाताओं को जीतना होगा) अभियान द्वारा जारी हेल्पलाइन नंबर, 4 जून को सुबह 7 बजे से दोपहर 12 बजे तक मतगणना प्रक्रिया में कहीं भी किसी भी तरह के उल्लंघन की रिपोर्ट करने के लिए खुला रहेगा।
हम आग्रह करते हैं कि जो भी सत्ता में आए, वह संविधान का पालन करे, उसकी रक्षा करे और उसे बनाए रखे।" प्रस्ताव में कुल तीन प्रमुख हस्तक्षेप और उनके तंत्र भी प्रस्तुत किए गए। पहला हस्तक्षेप स्वतंत्र मीडिया को प्रोत्साहित करके, वास्तविकता पर आधारित काउंटर नैरेटिव का निर्माण करके और सत्तारूढ़ सरकार द्वारा नियोजित मनोवैज्ञानिक हेरफेर की रणनीति का मुकाबला करके लोगों द्वारा निर्धारित कथा को बनाए रखना और उस पर कार्यकरना था।
03062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
In a May 9, 2024 paper, Juri Opitz from the University of Zurich, along with Shira Wein and Nathan Schneider form Georgetown University, discussed the importance of linguistic expertise in natural language processing (NLP) in an era dominated by large language models (LLMs).
The authors explained that while machine translation (MT) previously relied heavily on linguists, the landscape has shifted. “Linguistics is no longer front and center in the way we build NLP systems,” they said. With the emergence of LLMs, which can generate fluent text without the need for specialized modules to handle grammar or semantic coherence, the need for linguistic expertise in NLP is being questioned.
01062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Nuremberg principles war crime (wikipedia information)
1. FROM: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_crimes
In accordance with Federal Laws provided For Educational and Information Purposes – i.e. of PUBLIC Interest
War crime
A picture taken by the Polish Underground of Nazi Secret Police rounding up Polish intelligentsia at Palmiry near Warsaw in
1940 for mass execution (German AB-Aktion in occupied Poland).
War crimes are serious violations of the laws applicable in armed conflict (also known as international
humanitarian law) giving rise to individual criminal responsibility. Examples of such conduct include "murder, the
ill-treatment or deportation of civilian residents of an occupied territory to slave labor camps", "the murder or ill-
treatment of prisoners of war", the killing of prisoners, "the wanton destruction of cities, towns and villages, and
any devastation not justified by military, or civilian necessity". [1]
Similar concepts, such as perfidy, have existed for many centuries as customs between civilized countries, but
these customs were first codified as international law in the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907. The modern
concept of a war crime was further developed under the auspices of the Nuremberg Trials based on the definition
in the London Charter that was published on August 8, 1945. (Also see Nuremberg Principles.) Along with war
crimes the charter also defined crimes against peace and crimes against humanity, which are often committed
during wars and in concert with war crimes.
Article 22 of The Hague IV ("Laws of War: Laws and Customs of War on Land (Hague IV); October 18, 1907")
states that "The right of belligerents to adopt means of injuring the enemy is not unlimited"[2] and over the last
century many other treaties have introduced positive laws that place constraints on belligerents (see International
treaties on the laws of war). Some of the provisions, such as those in The Hague, the Geneva, and Genocide
Conventions, are considered to be part of customary international law, and are binding on all. [3][4] Others are only
binding on individuals if the belligerent power to which they belong is a party to the treaty which introduced the
constraint.
Contents
[hide]
1 History
o 1.1 Early example
o 1.2 Hague Conventions
o 1.3 Geneva Conventions
o 1.4 Leipzig War Crimes Trial
o 1.5 London Charter / Nuremberg Trials 1945
o 1.6 International Military Tribunal for the Far East 1946
o 1.7 International Criminal Court 2002
2. 2 Prominent indictees
3 Definition
4 See also
5 Footnotes
6 References
7 External links
[edit] History
Hsuchow, China, 1938. A ditch full of the bodies of Chinese civilians, killed by Japanese soldiers.[5]
[edit] Early example
The trial of Peter von Hagenbach by an ad hoc tribunal of the Holy Roman Empire in 1474, was the first
"international" war crimes trial, and also of command responsibility.[6][7] He was convicted and beheaded for
crimes that "he as a knight was deemed to have a duty to prevent", although he had argued that he was only
"following orders".
[edit] Hague Conventions
Main article: Hague Conventions (1899 and 1907)
The Hague Conventions were international treaties negotiated at the First and Second Peace Conferences at The
Hague, Netherlands in 1899 and 1907, respectively, and were, along with the First and Second Geneva
Conventions (1864 and 1909), among the first formal statements of the laws of war and war crimes in the nascent
body of secular international law.
[edit] Geneva Conventions
Main article: Geneva Conventions
The Geneva Conventions are four related treaties adopted and continuously expanded from 1864 to 1949 that
represent a legal basis and framework for the conduct of war under international law. Every single member state of
the United Nations has currently ratified the conventions, which are universally accepted as customary
international law, applicable to every situation of armed conflict in the world. However, the Additional Protocols
to the Geneva Conventions adopted in 1977 containing the most pertinent, detailed and virulent protections of
international humanitarian law for persons and objects in modern warfare are still not ratified by a number of
States continuously engaged in armed conflicts, namely the United States, Israel, India, Pakistan, Iraq, Iran, and
3. others. Accordingly, states retain different codes and values with regard to wartime conduct. Some signatories
have routinely violated the Geneva Conventions in a way which either uses the ambiguities of law or political
maneuvering to sidestep the laws' formalities and principles.
All conventions were revised and expanded in 1949:
First Geneva Convention "for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the
Field" (first adopted in 1864, last revision in 1949).
Second Geneva Convention "for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of
Armed Forces at Sea" (first adopted in 1906).
Third Geneva Convention "relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War" (first adopted in 1929, last revision in
1949).
Fourth Geneva Convention "relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War" (first adopted in 1949,
based on parts of the 1907 Hague Convention IV).
Two Additional Protocols were adopted in 1977, completing and updating the Geneva Conventions:
Protocol I (1977) "relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts."
Protocol II (1977) "relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts."
[edit] Leipzig War Crimes Trial
Main article: Leipzig War Crimes Trial
Several German military commanders of the First World War were tried in 1921 by the German Supreme Court for
war crimes.
[edit] London Charter / Nuremberg Trials 1945
Main article: London Charter of the International Military Tribunal
The modern concept of war crime was further developed under the auspices of the Nuremberg Trials based on the
definition in the London Charter that was published on August 8, 1945. (Also see Nuremberg Principles.) Along
with war crimes the charter also defined crimes against peace and crimes against humanity, which are often
committed during wars and in concert with war crimes.
[edit] International Military Tribunal for the Far East 1946
Main article: International Military Tribunal for the Far East
Also known as the Tokyo Trial, the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal or simply as the Tribunal, it was convened on
May 3, 1946 to try the leaders of the Empire of Japan for three types of crimes: "Class A" (crimes against peace),
"Class B" (war crimes), and "Class C" (crimes against humanity), committed during World War II.
[edit] International Criminal Court 2002
4. Bodies of some of the hundreds of Vietnamese villagers who were murdered by U.S. soldiers during the My Lai Massacre
On July 1, 2002, the International Criminal Court, a treaty-based court located in The Hague, came into being for
the prosecution of war crimes committed on or after that date. Several nations, most notably the United States,
China, Russia, and Israel, have criticized the court. The United States still participates as an observer. Article 12 of
the Rome Statute provides jurisdiction over the citizens of non-contracting states in the event that they are accused
of committing crimes in the territory of one of the state parties.[8]
However the court only has jurisdiction over these crimes where they are "part of a plan or policy or as part of a
large-scale commission of such crimes".[9]
[edit] Prominent indictees
Main article: List of war crimes
Heads of state & government
To date, the present and former heads of state and heads of government that have been charged with war crimes
include:
German Großadmiral and President Karl Dönitz and Japanese Prime Ministers and Generals Hideki Tōjō and
Kuniaki Koiso in the aftermath of World War II.
Former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milošević was brought to trial for alleged war crimes, but died in custody in
2006 before the trial could be concluded after more than 4 years of proceedings.
Former Liberian President Charles G. Taylor was also brought to The Hague charged with war crimes; his trial
stretched from 2007 to March 2011; a verdict is still being awaited. [10]
Former Bosnian Serb President Radovan Karadžić was arrested in Belgrade on 18 July 2008 and brought before
Belgrade's War Crimes Court a few days after. He was extradited to the Netherlands, and is currently in The Hague,
in the custody of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. The trial began in 2010 and is
expected to continue until 2014.
Omar al-Bashir, current head of state of Sudan, for actions in Darfur.
Former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi has been indicted for allegedly ordering the killings of protesters and
civilians during the 2011 Libyan civil war, however he was killed before he could stand trial in October 2011.
Other prominent indictees
Yoshijirō Umezu, a general in the Imperial Japanese Army
Seishirō Itagaki, War minister of the Empire of Japan
Hermann Göring, Commander in Chief of the Luftwaffe.
Ernst Kaltenbrunner and Adolf Eichmann—high ranking members of the SS.
Wilhelm Keitel—Generalfeldmarschall, head of the Oberkommando der Wehrmacht.
Erich Raeder—Großadmiral, Commander in Chief of the Kriegsmarine.
Albert Speer—Minister of Armaments and War Production in Nazi Germany 1942-45.
Ratko Mladić, indicted for genocide amongst other violations of humanitarian law during the Bosnian War; he was
captured in Serbia in May 2011 and has been extradited to face trial in The Hague, [11]
5. [edit] Definition
Aftermath of the Malmedy massacre (1944)
War Crimes are those serious violations of the rules of customary and treaty law concerning international
humanitarian law that have become accepted as criminal offences for which there is individual responsibility.[12]
Colloquial definitions of war crime include violations of established protections of the laws of war, but also
include failures to adhere to norms of procedure and rules of battle, such as attacking those displaying a peaceful
flag of truce, or using that same flag as a ruse of war to mount an attack. Attacking enemy troops while they are
being deployed by way of a parachute is not a war crime. [13] However, Protocol I, Article 42 of the Geneva
Conventions explicitly forbids attacking parachutists who eject from damaged airplanes, and surrendering
parachutists once landed.[14] War crimes include such acts as mistreatment of prisoners of war or civilians. War
crimes are sometimes part of instances of mass murder and genocide though these crimes are more broadly
covered under international humanitarian law described as crimes against humanity.
Destruction of the Adam Mickiewicz Monument, Kraków, Poland by German forces on August 17, 1940.
War crimes are significant in international humanitarian law[15] because it is an area where international tribunals
such as the Nuremberg Trials and Tokyo trials have been convened. Recent examples are the International
Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, which were
established by the UN Security Council acting under Chapter VIII of the UN Charter.
Under the Nuremberg Principles, war crimes are different from crimes against peace which is planning, preparing,
initiating, or waging a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements, or assurances.
Because the definition of a state of "war" may be debated, the term "war crime" itself has seen different usage
under different systems of international and military law. It has some degree of application outside of what some
may consider to be a state of "war", but in areas where conflicts persist enough to constitute social instability.
The legalities of war have sometimes been accused of containing favoritism toward the winners ("Victor's
justice"),[16] as some controversies have not been ruled as war crimes. Some examples include the Allies'
destruction of civilian Axis targets during World War II, such as the firebombing of the German city of Dresden
and the use of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki;[17] the use of Agent Orange against civilian targets in the
Vietnam War;[citation needed] the mass killing of Biharies by Kader Siddique and Mukti Bahini[18] before or after
6. victory of Bangladesh Liberation War in Bangladesh between 1971 and 1972; and the Indonesian occupation of
East Timor between 1976 and 1999.
Another example is the Allied re-designation of German POWs (under the protection of the Geneva conventions)
into Disarmed Enemy Forces (allegedly unprotected by the Geneva conventions), many of which then were used
for forced labor such as clearing minefields. By December 1945 it was estimated by French authorities that 2,000
German prisoners were being killed or maimed each month in mine-clearing accidents.[19]
[edit] See also
Country listings Legal issues Miscellaneous
List of war crimes Rule of Law in Armed Conflicts Crime against humanity
German war crimes Project (RULAC) Crime against peace
Consequences of German Nazism Laws of war Doctors' Trial
Allied war crimes during World Command responsibility NKVD prisoner massacres
War II War Crimes Law (Belgium) Consequences of German
American war crimes Russell Tribunal Nazism
War crimes of the Wehrmacht The International Criminal Court Human shield
Soviet war crimes and the 2003 invasion of Iraq International Criminal Court
Japanese war crimes Special Court for Sierra Leone investigations
International Military Tribunal for American Service-Members' Transitional justice
the Far East Protection Act Nazi human experimentation
United States Senate Committee Nuremberg Principles
on the Philippines Katyn massacre
1971 Bangladesh atrocities Srebrenica massacre
Armenian Genocide Forensic archaeology
Terror bombing
Winter Soldier Investigation
Genocide portal
[edit] Footnotes
1. ^ Gary D. Solish (2010) The Law of Armed Conflict: International Humanitarian Law in War, Cambridge University
Press ISBN 9780521870887 pp. 301-303
2. ^ "The Avalon Prject—Laws of War : Laws and Customs of War on Land (Hague IV); October 18, 1907".
Avalon.law.yale.edu. Retrieved 2010-05-03.
3. ^ Judgement: The Law Relating to War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity contained in the Avalon Project
archive at Yale Law School. "but by 1939 these rules laid down in the [Hague] Convention [of 1907] were
recognised by all civilized nations, and were regarded as being declaratory of the laws and customs of war"
4. ^ "Report Of The Secretary-General Pursuant To Paragraph 2 Of Security Council Resolution 808 (1993)". S/25704.
United Nations. 3 MAY 1993. Retrieved 13 October 2010. "35. The part of conventional international humanitarian
law which has beyond doubt become part of international customary law is the law applicable in armed conflict as
embodied in: the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 for the Protection of War Victims; The Hague Convention
(IV) Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land and the Regulations annexed thereto of 18 October 1907; the
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide of 9 December 1948; and the Charter of the
International Military Tribunal of 8 August 1945."
5. ^ It may be pointless to try to establish which World War II Axis aggressor, Germany or Japan, was the more brutal
to the peoples it victimised. The Germans killed six million Jews and 20 million Russians [i.e. Soviet citizens]; the
Japanese slaughtered as many as 30 million Filipinos, Malays, Vietnamese, Cambodians, Indonesians and Burmese,
at least 23 million of them ethnic Chinese. Both nations looted the countries they conquered on a monumental scale,
though Japan plundered more, over a longer period, than the Nazis. Both conquerors enslaved millions and exploited
7. them as forced labourers—and, in the case of the Japanese, as [forced] prostitutes for front-line troops. Johnson,
Looting of Asia
6. ^ The evolution of individual criminal responsibility under international law By Edoardo Greppi, Associate Professor
of International Law at the University of Turin, Italy, International Committee of the Red Cross No. 835, p. 531-553,
October 30, 1999.
7. ^ highlights the first international war crimes tribunal by Linda Grant, Harvard Law Bulletin.
8. ^ "Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 1998". UN Treaty Organization. Retrieved 13 October 2010.
9. ^ Rome Statute, Part II, Article 8.
10. ^ http://english.aljazeera.net/news/europe/2011/03/2011311172946791811.html
11. ^ http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-13611645
12. ^ Shaw, M.N (2008). International Law. Cambridge University Press. pp. 433–434. ISBN 978-0-521-89929-1.
13. ^ From the Library of Congress, Military Legal Resources.[1]
14. ^ Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of
International Armed Conflict, International Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva, Switzerland.(Protocol I)
15. ^ The Program for Humanitarian Policy and Conflict Research, "Brief Primer on IHL" Accessed at
http://ihl.ihlresearch.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=page.viewpage&pageid=2083
16. ^ Zolo, Danilo (November 2, 2009). Victors' Justice: From Nuremberg to Baghdad. Verso. ISBN 9781844673179.
17. ^ 'The Atomic Bombing, The Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal and the Shimoda Case: Lessons for Anti-Nuclear Legal
Movements' by Yuki Tanaka and Richard Falk
18. ^ Interview With History by Oriana Fallaci-
19. ^ S. P. MacKenzie "The Treatment of Prisoners of War in World War II" The Journal of Modern History, Vol. 66,
No. 3. (Sep., 1994), pp. 487-520.
[edit] References
Robert Cryer (2007). An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. Cambridge University Press.
ISBN 9780521876094.
Malcolm N. Shaw (24 November 2008). International law. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521728140.
Retrieved 14 November 2010.
Yôrām Dinstein (2004). The conduct of hostilities under the law of international armed conflict. Cambridge
University Press. ISBN 9780521542272. Retrieved 14 November 2010.
Gary D. Solis (2010). The Law of Armed Conflict: International Humanitarian Law in War. Cambridge University
Press. ISBN 9780521870887. Retrieved 14 November 2010.
[edit] External links
"International criminal jurisdiction". International Committee of the Red Cross.
"Cambodia Tribunal Monitor". Northwestern University School of Law Center for International Human Rights and
Documentation Center of Cambodia. Retrieved 2008-12-17.
Burns, John (January 30 2008). "Quarter, Giving No". Crimes of War Project. Retrieved 2008-12-17.
"War Crimes: Videos, Forums and Communities". War Crimes Limited (UK). 2008. Retrieved 2008-12-17.
"Video: Not a War Criminal". Retrieved 2008-12-17.
War Crimes: Responsibility and the Psychology of Atrocity
Human Rights First; Command's Responsibility: Detainee Deaths in U.S. Custody in Iraq and Afghanistan
TheRule of Law in Armed Conflicts Project
Documents and Resources on War, War Crimes and Genocide
Iraqi Special Tribunal
Crimes of War Project
Rome Treaty of the International Criminal Court
Special Court for Sierra Leone
UN International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
UN International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda
Ad-Hoc Court for East Timor
CBC Digital Archives -Fleeing Justice: War Criminals in Canada