Notice of hearing for Appeal No. 119689 by CIC

•

0 likes•185 views

This document is a hearing notice from the Central Information Commission regarding an appeal made by Asha Rani Devi related to an RTI application filed on January 5th, 2017. The hearing will be held on July 23rd, 2018 at 12:30 PM before Information Commissioner Divya Prakash Sinha. The CPIO, appellant, and any third parties involved are instructed to attend and submit any documents or written statements at least 7 days before the hearing. Parties must bring valid photo ID and arrive at least 30 minutes early.

Law

Hearing Notice
Central Information Commission
Baba Gang Nath Marg,
Munirka, New Delhi - 110067
011-26106140
http://dsscic.nic.in/online-link-paper-compliance/add
File No. CIC/CICOM/A/2017/119689 DATE : 28-06-2018
NOTICE OF HEARING FOR APPEAL/COMPLAINT
Appellant(s)/Complainant(s): Respondent(s):
ASHA RANI DEVI
RZF-893 NETAJI SUBHASH MARG RAJ
NAGAR PART 2 PALAM COLONY DWARKA
SEC 09, Delhi- 110077
Delhi,New Delhi,NA
CPIO :
1. THE CPIO
CENTRAL INFORMATION
COMMISSION CIC Bhawan, Baba
Gang Nath Marg, Munirka, New
Delhi - 110067
Date of RTI Date of reply,if
any,of CPIO
Date of 1st Appeal
made,if any
Date of order,if
any,of First AA
05-01-2017 24-01-2017 27-01-2017 30-01-2017
1. Take notice that the above appeal/complaint in respect of RTI application dated 05-01-2017 filed
by the appellant/complainant has been listed for hearing before Hon'bleInformation Commissioner
Mr. Divya Prakash Sinha at Venue Room No. 203, CIC Bhawan, Baba Gang Nath Marg,
Munirka, New Delhi - 110067 on 23-07-2018 at 12:30 PM .
2. The appellant/complainant may present his/her case(s) in person or through his/her duly
authorized representative.
3. (a) CPIO/PIO should personally attend the hearing; if for a compelling reason(s) he/she is unable
to be present, he/she has to give reasons for the same and shall authorise an officer not below the
rank of CPIO.PIO, fully acquainted with the facts of the case and bring complete file/file(s) with
him.
(b) If the CPIO attending the hearing before the Commission does not happen to be the concerned
CPIO, it shall still be his/her responsibility to ensure that the CPIO(s) concerned must attend with
complete file concerning the RTI request, the hearing along with him.
4. All the parties may submit their written submission, if any, to the Commission at least 7 days

before the date of hearing. A copy of the same shall be served upon opposite party. If any party
wishes to make online submission, the same may be sent to the Commission's link only viz.,
http://dsscic.nic.in/online-link-paper-compliance/add
5. CPIO is also directed to inform the third party, if any, so as to enable it to defend or present its
case before the Commission. Third Party may choose to be present before the Commission either in
person or through its duly authorized representative for hearing, or they may also file a written
submission to the Commission before the hearing.
6. The authorised representative or the officer of the public authority and the
appellant/complainant/third party is advised to carry a “proof of identity” along with the
authorization letter.
7. Take notice that in default of your appearance on the time and date mentioned aforesaid, the case
shall be heard and decided in your absence and that there will be no adjournment and review.
8. The parties concerned should reach the venue at least 30 minutes before the scheduled time of
hearing. They are also requested to intimate their telephone/mobile numbers and email address to
the undersigned.
Reference number of CPIO Reply(if any) :
-
H P Sen
Dy. Registrar
To
1. CPIO,Public Authority
2. Appellant/Complainant
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

This notice informs the appellant and respondent of a hearing scheduled before the Central Information Commission to hear an appeal regarding an RTI application. Both parties as well as the CPIO are directed to attend the hearing on July 23, 2018 at 12:15 PM to present their cases. Instructions are provided regarding written submissions, authorization of representatives, proof of identity, and other procedural details for the hearing.

Delhi hc nov 12 bail to ddelhi riots accused order

ZahidManiyar

1. The petitioner filed a petition seeking regular bail in a case where he was charged with offenses under Sections 147/148/149/436/380 IPC. 2. It was noted that the petitioner has weak eyesight (-3.75) and was not wearing glasses in the CCTV footage, unlike when he was arrested. Given his weak vision, it could not be believed that he would have clear vision at night without glasses. 3. Considering the facts and that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since April 11, 2020, the court granted the petitioner bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 15,000 with one surety of the same amount.

Bennett v LB Southwark (CA permission)

Joe Sykes

This document summarizes a judgment from the Court of Appeal regarding an employment discrimination case. It states that the original employment tribunal disqualified itself after 10 days of hearings because the claimant's representative accused them of racial bias. A second employment tribunal then struck out the case, finding the representative's conduct vexatious. The Employment Appeal Tribunal held that the first tribunal was wrong to disqualify itself but agreed the case should be struck out. The Court of Appeal granted permission to appeal, as questions of principle regarding tribunal bias were at issue and the consequences of allowing the appeal were not fully addressed. It concludes that permission to appeal was granted due to the unfortunate fact that no hearing has concluded despite the dismissal occurring years

Exemption Application Format

MukulThakur36

e-ticket_7242125247859

Emile Rached

This travel itinerary provides details of Emile Rached's roundtrip flight from Beirut, Lebanon to Zurich, Switzerland on Swiss Airlines. The itinerary includes: - Flight details for the outbound trip from Beirut to Zurich on September 6th, departing at 3:15 and arriving at 6:25. - Flight details for the return trip from Zurich to Beirut on September 7th, departing at 21:45 and arriving the next day at 20:15. - The ticket number, booking reference number, and notice that the electronic ticket is stored in Swiss Airlines' reservation system and is non-transferable.

Appform

Gheorghe Adrian

The document is an application form for the position of Chief Officer submitted by Adrian Gheorghe. It includes his personal details like name, date of birth, contact information, citizenship and current availability. It also lists his educational qualifications including a degree from the Naval Academy and certificates held. These include Chief Mate CoC, GMDSS and DP certificates. Finally, it provides details of his 24 years of seafaring experience including most recently as Chief Officer on offshore vessels like AHTS and PSV with DP2 systems in areas like Egypt, West Africa and Angola. He is a responsible team player seeking a job in the offshore industry utilizing his experience on offshore vessels.

CAPT. QAIM KHAN CV (1)

Qaim Khan

This document is a CV submitted by QAIM KHAN for the position of Master. It provides personal details like name, date of birth, addresses, qualifications, medical fitness, licenses and certificates held, sea service experience and bank details. Over the past 5 years, QAIM KHAN has served as Chief Officer and Master on various crude oil and product tankers of different nationalities and tonnages under DYNACOM TM and other shipping companies.

CV_Aidarkhanov Dastan-eng

Dastan Aidarkhanov

Dastan Tergeuovich Aidarkhanov is a procurement engineer with over 7 years of experience in oil and gas procurement in Kazakhstan. He holds a Bachelor's and Master's degree in International Law and has extensive training in procurement, contracts, and oil and gas development. He is currently employed by Caspi Meruerty Operating Company B.V. and has previously worked for Tasbolat Oil Corporation LLP and OMV Petrom S.A. in Kazakhstan.

This document contains a draft of proposed new Right to Information (RTI) Rules, 2017 in India. Key points: 1) The Ministry of Personnel is considering making new RTI Rules to replace the 2012 version. 2) The draft of the proposed new RTI Rules, 2017 is enclosed for stakeholders to provide views and suggestions on by April 15th. 3) The draft contains 22 proposed rules on various procedures under the RTI Act, including rules regarding application fees, fees for information provision, exemption from fees, appeal processes, complaint processes, and compliance with Commission orders.

Vinson m paul cic ksic-idiot or traitor- you decide

Raviforjustice Raviforjustice

1. The document discusses a complaint filed with the Kerala State Information Commission regarding a response to a Right to Information (RTI) application. 2. The complainant had filed an RTI application with the Village Office, Pudussery Central seeking information about computer systems used in the office. When no response was received, he filed first and second appeals which also received no response. 3. In his decision, the Chief Information Commissioner noted that the complainant was absent from the hearing scheduled to address the complaint. The Commissioner determined that providing access to inspect documents was sufficient response to the original RTI application.

Draft Right to Information Rules 2017

Home , Individual

The document outlines proposed amendments to the Right to Information (RTI) Rules in India. Key points include: 1) New definitions for "non-compliance" and "representative" are introduced. 2) Fees for obtaining information under the RTI Act are specified, ranging from Rs. 2 per page to Rs. 50 per diskette. 3) Acceptable modes of payment for RTI application fees are listed as cash, demand draft, electronic payment, or other notified means. 4) Detailed procedures for filing appeals to the Central Information Commission are given when information requests are denied, including required documents and formatting.

First appeal against CIC New Delhi dated 24.01.2017 for Non- Implementation ...

Om Prakash Poddar

Letter to State Information Commission Bihar dated 13.03.2018 by CIC

Om Prakash Poddar

The document is a memo from the Central Information Commission transferring a second appeal/complaint to the Bihar Information Commission. The memo explains that the original RTI filed with the Ministry of Law and Justice was transferred to the Patna Court and then to the Ld. CJM cum PIO of Begusarai District Court in Bihar. Similarly, the first appeal filed with the Patna High Court was transferred to the District and Sessions Judge of Begusarai Civil Court. As these public authorities fall under the jurisdiction of the Bihar Information Commission, the second appeal documents and additional documents from an earlier appeal are enclosed for requisite action.

Second Appeal against CIC New Delhi for Non-Implementation of Section 7(1) of...

Om Prakash Poddar

Second Appeal dated 21.04.2017 before CIC New Delhi against Non-disclosure of...

Om Prakash Poddar

Draft RTI Rules___20170501032726___

Om Prakash Poddar

Neither in the present Draft nor in the RTI Rule 2012 time time line has been fixed for Commission. As of now, it has been left up to the discretion of Central Registry of Commission. It kills the innocent citizen and protects corrupt officials. Time bound registration, allocation of file numbers, listing of matters and procedure of deciding second appeals/complaints to be more objective rather than subjective.

119142 7993 52_procedure_of_filing_a_case (1)

catarunmittal2

This document outlines filing procedures for three types of consumer complaints in India: 1. Consumer Complaints (CC) involving claims over 1 Crore Rupees must be filed with the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission within 2 years of the cause of action arising. 2. First Appeals (FA) of orders by State Commissions can be filed within 30 days of receiving the order. 3. Revision Petitions (RP) seeking review of pending or decided cases in State Commissions can be filed within 90 days of receiving the order. Detailed filing requirements and procedures are provided for each type of complaint.

RTI ACT 2005 PART-II

Avinash Kumar Gupta

1) The document outlines the procedures and guidelines for implementing the Right to Information Act in India, including the designation of Central and Assistant Public Information Officers, procedures for filing information requests, fees, exemptions, timelines for responses, and penalties. 2) Key points include that every public authority must appoint CPIOs, applications can be submitted to CPIOs or APIOs, fees may be paid in various ways, and information must generally be provided within 30 days while information regarding life and liberty must be provided within 48 hours. 3) Certain categories of information are exempt from disclosure including information that would affect national security or sovereignty, commercial confidence, or cabinet papers.

RTI

Shaham Khan

The document discusses India's Right to Information Act of 2005, which grants citizens access to information held by public authorities. It flows from constitutional rights to freedom of speech and expression and the right to life and liberty. The Act defines information broadly and requires public authorities to proactively disclose information, maintain records electronically, and designate Public Information Officers to respond to requests from citizens. While some information, such as national security matters, is exempt, the Act establishes a process for appeals when information requests are denied in part or full. The goal of the Act is to minimize the need for citizens to use it by ensuring proactive disclosure and availability of information.

Rti to poi-remove cic-210407

Raviforjustice Raviforjustice

1. This document is an application to remove the Chief Information Commissioner under Section 14(3)(d) of the Right to Information Act 2005. The application argues that the performance of the Central Information Commission has been poor, delaying justice for information seekers. 2. Public hearings on the functioning of the Commission recommended that cases should not be closed without both parties being heard, penalties should be imposed when officials violate the law, and guidelines developed for exemptions. However, these recommendations have not been implemented. 3. The application provides two examples of absurd decisions by the Commission from the applicant's experience, demonstrating poor drafting and a misunderstanding of the cases. The applicant requests that the Chief Information Commissioner be removed and

CIC ORDER AGAINST DELHI STATE LEGAL SERVISCE AUTHORITY DATED 25 SEPTEMBER 2014

Om Prakash Poddar

1) The appellant filed an RTI application seeking information about the action taken on his complaints from Delhi State Legal Services Authority. 2) The PIO provided a partial response which did not satisfy the appellant. He filed first and second appeals. 3) The Information Commissioner directed the PIO to provide information to the appellant within 3 weeks on the specific actions taken on his complaints from February and May 2012.

Rti rules 2017-redrafted by rti activist

Raviforjustice Raviforjustice

The DoPT, vide their circular No 1/5/2016-IR dated 31 Mar 2017, has invited suggestions from the public on the proposed RTI Rules, 2017 attached to it. These rules have nothing in them to ensure compliance of the law by PIOs, FAAs and ICs and are obviously intended to make it more difficult for information seekers to access information and easy for public servants to avoid providing them. If anything these proposals only expose the public servants who have drafted them and approved them for circulation as idiots and traitors! Under the circumstances it has become necessary to draft an entirely independant set of rules for the effective implementation of the RTI Act in keeping with its objectives- for setting out the practical regime of right to information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities, in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority and also to contain corruption and to hold Governments and their instrumentalities accountable to the governed- as stated in its preamble.

Tribunal 10 december-2014 hearing decision notice and statement of reasons SC...

eichhornn

Human right

Naveen Sihag

The Right to Information Act 2005 grants citizens access to information held by public authorities, based on the fundamental rights to freedom of speech and expression and life and liberty. It requires public authorities to proactively disclose information and designate Public Information Officers to respond to information requests within 30 days. While most information must be disclosed, there are exemptions for information like national security or personal privacy. Citizens can appeal rejections to higher authorities. The Act aims to maximize transparency and minimize the need for information requests.

371RWA1.pdf

JackieDenisseMaldona

This document is an addendum to the panel report in the dispute between the Philippines and Thailand regarding customs and fiscal measures on cigarettes from the Philippines. It contains annexes A through C of the panel report. Annex A describes the panel's working procedures. Annex B summarizes the arguments of the Philippines and Thailand. Annex C summarizes the arguments of third parties Australia, Canada, the European Union, Japan, and the United States.

1 publication rules22-24 (4)

Harve Abella

This document is a request from the Supreme Court of the Philippines to publish Rules 22 and 24 of the proposed Revised Rules of Civil Procedure in newspapers. These rules will be piloted in specific courts in Quezon City, Makati City, Angeles City, Iloilo City, Davao City, and Cebu City beginning February 16, 2015. The rules establish procedures for mandatory disclosure of evidence by parties, preparation of terms of reference to define the scope of trial, and preliminary conferences between the court and parties.

Cyber regulations appellate tribunal (procedure) rules, 2000

Leo Lukose

- The document outlines rules for the Cyber Regulations Appellate Tribunal established under the Information Technology Act, 2000 in India. - It details procedures for filing applications to the tribunal, serving notices, submitting replies, location and timings of hearings, and roles of the Registrar and Presiding Officer. - The rules aim to provide an efficient process for appeals related to cyber regulations and orders in India.

Reply to Election Commission Delhi in NGS5322435639 dated 25.11.2022.pdf

Om Prakash Poddar

ERO Ms. Sunita Raj mobile no. 9650058340 59-Vishwas Nagar Constituency Sahadra district at East Delhi has admitted this fact that she has sent her man for making a fake voters under the legal guardianship of Complainant on 24.11.2022 at Shelter Home DUSIB Code No.214 near Anand Vihar ISBT Delhi. Hence, your BLO will disclose the name and address of person for whom he wanted to make fake Voter ID with ulterior motives. 112 call has been made against your fraud BLO dated 24.11.2022 with unique reference no. 6161038, PCR Petrol Vehicle ROMO9A mobile no. 7428002509 at 19.32.34pm. Anand Vihar policeman mobile number is 8595888677. Police had taken him to the police station. Hence police has recorded his name and address and motives behind it. Inquiry officer Balveer Singh mobile no. 9654963400 of Patpatganj Industrial Area Police Station near Anand Vihar ISBT Delhi will provide you the name and address of person who had come to make a fake voters under the legal guardianship of Complainant. Your fraud BLO did not disclose his identity before complainant.

Complaint dated 27.11.2022 to Commissioner of Polic Delhi.pdf

Om Prakash Poddar

TAKE the cognizance of obvious links between Ms. Sunita Raj, BLO Anand Vihar and Mr. Manish Raj with this International Sex Racket and direct to concern SHO to register an F.I.R against the accused under relevant sections of IPC. 112 call dated 24.11.2022 at 19.32.34pm with unique reference no. 6161038 and subsequent Complaint dated 25.11.2022 to the Commissioner of Police Delhi dated 25.11.2022 discloses links with Mr. Manish Raj son of Chief Minister of Jharkhand in this International Sex Racket

Similar to Notice of hearing for Appeal No. 119689 by CIC

Rti cmk-sic appt-280318-appln

Raviforjustice Raviforjustice

Rti rules 2017-draft-dopt circular-1 5-2016-ir-31032017

Raviforjustice Raviforjustice

Vinson m paul cic ksic-idiot or traitor- you decide

Raviforjustice Raviforjustice

Draft Right to Information Rules 2017

Home , Individual

First appeal against CIC New Delhi dated 24.01.2017 for Non- Implementation ...

Om Prakash Poddar

Letter to State Information Commission Bihar dated 13.03.2018 by CIC

Om Prakash Poddar

Second Appeal against CIC New Delhi for Non-Implementation of Section 7(1) of...

Om Prakash Poddar

Second Appeal dated 21.04.2017 before CIC New Delhi against Non-disclosure of...

Om Prakash Poddar

Draft RTI Rules___20170501032726___

Om Prakash Poddar

119142 7993 52_procedure_of_filing_a_case (1)

catarunmittal2

RTI ACT 2005 PART-II

Avinash Kumar Gupta

RTI

Shaham Khan

Rti to poi-remove cic-210407

Raviforjustice Raviforjustice

CIC ORDER AGAINST DELHI STATE LEGAL SERVISCE AUTHORITY DATED 25 SEPTEMBER 2014

Om Prakash Poddar

Rti rules 2017-redrafted by rti activist

Raviforjustice Raviforjustice

Tribunal 10 december-2014 hearing decision notice and statement of reasons SC...

eichhornn

Human right

Naveen Sihag

371RWA1.pdf

JackieDenisseMaldona

1 publication rules22-24 (4)

Harve Abella

Cyber regulations appellate tribunal (procedure) rules, 2000

Leo Lukose

Similar to Notice of hearing for Appeal No. 119689 by CIC (20)

Rti cmk-sic appt-280318-appln

Rti rules 2017-draft-dopt circular-1 5-2016-ir-31032017

Vinson m paul cic ksic-idiot or traitor- you decide

Draft Right to Information Rules 2017

First appeal against CIC New Delhi dated 24.01.2017 for Non- Implementation ...

Letter to State Information Commission Bihar dated 13.03.2018 by CIC

Second Appeal against CIC New Delhi for Non-Implementation of Section 7(1) of...

Second Appeal dated 21.04.2017 before CIC New Delhi against Non-disclosure of...

Draft RTI Rules___20170501032726___

119142 7993 52_procedure_of_filing_a_case (1)

RTI ACT 2005 PART-II

RTI

Rti to poi-remove cic-210407

CIC ORDER AGAINST DELHI STATE LEGAL SERVISCE AUTHORITY DATED 25 SEPTEMBER 2014

Rti rules 2017-redrafted by rti activist

Tribunal 10 december-2014 hearing decision notice and statement of reasons SC...

Human right

371RWA1.pdf

1 publication rules22-24 (4)

Cyber regulations appellate tribunal (procedure) rules, 2000

More from Om Prakash Poddar

Reply to Election Commission Delhi in NGS5322435639 dated 25.11.2022.pdf

Om Prakash Poddar

Complaint dated 27.11.2022 to Commissioner of Polic Delhi.pdf

Om Prakash Poddar

Letter dated 27.11.2022 to CJI SC.pdf

Om Prakash Poddar

Suppression of crucial records in Office Report dated 26.11.2022 in W.P. (Criminal) Diary No. 18546/2022 listed for hearing on 28.11.2022 before Chamber Judge HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, Court No.15 CL.NO.1748 may lead to dismissal of petition. Registry has only recorded the records to defend its heinous work in the Office Report dated 26.11.2022 hiding all the factual crucial records filed by the petitioner even after his reminder though e-filed letter dated 22.11.2022 addressed to Branch Officer and Assistant Registrar Section X

Office Report dated 26.11.2022 in International Sex Racket matter Writ Petit...

Om Prakash Poddar

Office Report dated 28.11.2022 in International Sex Racket matter Writ Petit...

Om Prakash Poddar

The document is an office report from the Supreme Court of India regarding a writ petition filed by Om Prakash against the Union of India and others. The court had previously given the petitioner four weeks to cure any defects in the petition, but the petitioner has failed to file an application for condonation of delay in filing the writ petition within that timeframe. As there are still defects, the registrar has not yet interacted with the petitioner-in-person, so the matter is listed before the court for further directions.

Complaint dated 26.11.22 against Election Officer Katihar Bihar.pdf

Om Prakash Poddar

a fake voter identity card has been created by BLO Part-220, Ward No.03, 64-Kadwa Constituency Katihar Bihar vide EPIC No. TYGO395244 against the Complainant. Complainant has figured out malpractices of BLO and submitted requisite form before BLO Gopal Malik mobile no. 9507949474 dated 17.12.2021 for deletion of his name from the voter list to suppress the practice of multiple voter identity cards across the Country.

Complaint dated 25.11.22 against Election Officer Sahadra Delhi.pdf

Om Prakash Poddar

Letter dated 24.11.2022 to CJI.pdf

Om Prakash Poddar

Letter dated 23.11.2022 to CJI.pdf

Om Prakash Poddar

Letter dated 22.11.2022 to Branch Officer Section 10 at Supreme Court of Ind...

Om Prakash Poddar

Additional e-Filed Petition dated 25.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Sup...

Om Prakash Poddar

Additional e-Filed Petition dated 25.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Sup...

Om Prakash Poddar

Additional e-Filed Petition dated 07.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Sup...

Om Prakash Poddar

This document contains information from the Supreme Court of India case management system. It lists details of a writ petition filed by Om Prakash such as the case type, number, year and presiding bench. It also includes a table with 10 uploaded PDF documents related to the petition, interlocutory applications and memos of appearance. General information about the court such as jurisdiction, officers, rules, and procedures is also presented.

E-Filed Petition dated 07.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Supreme Court ...

Om Prakash Poddar

Complaint dated 21.11.2022 against Bihar and Delhi police to NHRC.pdf

Om Prakash Poddar

The National Human Rights Commission has received a complaint from Om Prakash regarding the kidnapping and abduction of his family members and minor daughters since 2011. The complaint details that neither the Delhi Police nor Bihar Police have registered an FIR regarding this incident. The complaint further states that the police complaint and post-mortem report of Om Prakash's deceased mother, who died in 2017, are still pending with the Palam Village Police Station in New Delhi. Om Prakash alleges that five individuals, including two advocates, can provide information to rescue his minor daughters and has requested that an FIR be registered against these five people.

E-filed status dated 15.11.22 before Supreme Court of India.pdf

Om Prakash Poddar

Complaint aginst Delhi Police to NHRC New Delhi dated 20.11.22.pdf

Om Prakash Poddar

ABDUCTION/RAPE by Police Surender Narayan Poddar, Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar, Advocate Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari Advocate Sunil Ojha is key person who will reveal all records of this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters. Hence, register F.I.R against these five people to interrogate in this matter. Register an F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court at New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court at New Delhi.

Complaint aginst Kadwa Katihar Bihar Police to SHRC Bihar dated 20.11.22.pdf

Om Prakash Poddar

ABDUCTION/RAPE by Police case. Surender Narayan Poddar, Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar, Advocate Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari Advocate Sunil Ojha is key person who will reveal all records of this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters. Hence, register F.I.R against these five people to interrogate in this matter. Register an F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court at New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court at New Delhi.

Writ Petition Criminal diary no. 18546 of 2022 Part-II .pdf

Om Prakash Poddar

Register F.I.R against these five people to interrogate in this matter. Surender Narayan Poddar, Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar, Advocate Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari Advocate Sunil Ojha is key person who will reveal all records of this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters. Register an F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court at New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court at New Delhi.

Writ Petition Criminal Diary Number 18546 of 2022 Part-I .pdf

Om Prakash Poddar

International Sex Racket and Anti-Prostitution Petition before Supreme Court of India. These five are key people and will reveal all records in this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters. Register F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court New Delhi.

More from Om Prakash Poddar (20)