The ascendance of information industries and a global economy have contributed to new hierarchies and a displacement of economic significance between cities. Politics and systems of order often perform with linear authority, which can lead to limitation, while parallel informal networks are not as easily recognized. Weak connections between loosely organized voices can interconnect into strong movements able to overturn hierarchical power structures. Rhizomatic systems connect any point to any other in complex webs rather than tree structures, challenging traditional hierarchical validation and opening new encounters and priorities.

1. New Hierarchies
The ascendance of information industries and the growth of a global economy are inextricably linked, and have
contributed to what Saskia Sassen calls: a new geography of centres and margins (The global city: strategic site/new
frontier, 2000). This means that former structures of economical or political hegemony have radically changed (and are
still changing rapidly) with the consequence of a displacement (in economical sense), in both geographical significance of
cities and places, and in the valuation of different kind of labour: Financial services produce superprofits while industrial
services barely survive.
Beside the obvious impact of globalization, there is an equally obvious inconsistency between everyday life and the
performance of individual spatial practices, and the way the formal society is organised and governed. Politics, laws and
planning – and even partly the global economical systems (the colonization effect on places and societies), appears
essentially hierarchical, and perform linear authority, which in many cases has as consequence limitation, stagnation and
regression. Beside the governing systems of order, bureaucracy and linearity, there are infinite parallel systems of other
formal and informal networks, knowledge and ‘weak’ voices not so easily observed and recognised.
The complexity of this everyday reality presuppose new and experimental strategies and ideas for seeing, observation,
participation and mapping of what ever is relevant for the plans we are making, and the societies we are planning for – it
is a question of concern, like the title of Bruno Latour’s essay suggests, a transition From Matters of Fact to Matters of
Concern, (Critical Inquiry, 2004).
The latest year’s events and revolutionary rebellions in the Middle East show indeed examples of how weak connections
and loosely organized voices can interconnect into strong movements that are able to turn inherited hierarchical
structures of power upside down, and also institute new systems of organization. Not all changes have the character of
a violent revolution concerning time and drama, but any shift in a hierarchical system has the ultimate consequence of
changing basic living conditions – either it are shifts in natural systems or in social structures.
Through the concept of rhizome lies the ultimate metamorphosis of a hierarchical system, as by Gilles Deleuze and Félix
Guattari termed as a tree structure: unlike the trees or their roots, the rhizome connects any point to any other point,
and its traits are not necessarily linked to traits of the same nature; it brings into play very different regimes of signs, and
even non sign states. (…) Unlike the graphic arts, drawing, or photography, unlike tracings, the rhizome pertains to a
map that must be produced, constructed, a map that is always detachable, connectable, reversible, modifiable, and has
multiple entryways and exits and its own lines of flight. (Rhizome, A Thousand Plateaus, 1980) Through rhizome thinking,
hierarchical systems will no longer be valid, and new ideas of validation, new encounters and new priorities will become
relevant.
By working within the hierarchical planning system, but at the same time continuously develop the weak networks
outside the system, elastic but continuously more robust rhizome structures will grow. The plan will not be enclosed
and conclude fixed images but work along a Deleuze/Guattarian ‘lines of flight’ model. Doina Petrescu (Losing control,
keeping desire, Architecture and participation, 2004) describes; Guattari and Deleuze’s ‘lines’ challenge the usual
designer thinking about ‘lines’. They are an abstract and complex enough metaphor to map the entire social field, to trace
its shapes, its borders, its becomings. They can map the way ‘life always proceeds at several rhythms and at several
speeds’. They map individual cracks and collective breaks
within the segmentation and heterogeneity of power.
The ‘line of flight’, ligne de fuite, is defined not only as a
simple line, but as the very force of a tangle of lines flung
out, transgressing thresholds of established norms and
conventions, towards unexpected manifestations, both
in terms of socio-political phenomena and in individual
destinies.
New hierarchies: traffic New hierarchies: nature

2. Mapping the hyper normal
-the strategy of the open and unfinished plan
A hyper-mapping might be more subjective and give focus to values related to the context of the plan, than being strictly
neutral and objective. All layers of processes, programs and events add pieces to an open web. As an experience of the
computer technology and the Internet’s structure of collecting and storing data and knowledge, it should be possible to
develop new, open and unlimited web-structures of planning. This again should open up for an infinite input and output of
knowledge, where there has to be most focus on the process.
In his book Invisible cities (1972), Italo Calvino let the dialog between Marko Polo and Kublai Khan evolve as a narration
of innumerous urban conditions, as complex descriptions of different strange cities - and still after a while: Kublai Khan
had noticed that Marco Polo’s cities resembled one another, as if the passage from one to another involved not a journey
but a change of elements. They didn’t speak the same language, and the dialogue was full of hidden stories within the
story, with a constantly development of the perception of the city.
In an open plan-network it is possible for anyone to take position and to act or to influence the decisions. The amount of
data and knowledge is limitless – the strategy is to make operational systems to receive, handle, store and re-call the
information that is relevant. The interesting evolves in the meeting, and the crossing points (the folding) of information
and action. In these connection points and folding new things and exiting possibilities always exceed. The rhizome can be
drawn – not only as maps of expectations but rather as complex metaphors of spatial practices and landscape impact.
Rhizome: communications Rhizome: territorial practices