Since we are three-quarters of the way through 2023, maybe we should pause and assess what we think about “Year One” of a New World Order. What’s this, you say? What are you talking about? Well, your bewilderment is understandable; if you don’t read Nikkei Asia, you probably missed the article on March 14, 2023 with the jarring headline that read, “Trilateral Commission calls 2023 ‘Year One’ of new world order.”

1. NEWWORLD
DISORDER
Globalists declare 2023 “Year One” of a New World Order,
which means escalated transformation of the world into a
facsimile of Communist China.
by William F. Jasper
S
ince we are three-quarters of the
way through 2023, maybe we
should pause and assess what we
think about “Year One” of a New World
Order. What’s this, you say? What are you
talking about? Well, your bewilderment is
understandable; if you don’t read Nikkei
Asia, you probably missed the article on
March 14, 2023 with the jarring headline
that read, “Trilateral Commission calls
2023 ‘Year One’ of new world order.”
Nikkei Asia, one of Japan’s major
media outlets (and a sister publication
of the U.K.-based Financial Times), was
privileged to have its editor-in-chief and
diplomatic correspondent attend the secret
meeting (March 10-13) of the high-pow-
ered Trilateral Commission in New Delhi,
India. Meetings of the Trilateral Commis-
sion (TC), like those of the Bilderbergers,
the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR),
and similar globalist groups, operate under
the “Chatham House rule” of the Royal
Institute of International Affairs, which
allows attendees to repeat statements that
are made but not to identify the source of
any particular comment. Thus, over the
years, leading members of the Fake News
industrial complex that have been privy to
the Trilateralist conclaves have either kept
completely mum about the goings on at
these events or have duplicitously passed
them off to the public as mere civic-mind-
ed discussions among “the great and the
good.” This goes both for “journalists”
who are invited to attend as guests, as well
as for those who are TC members.
Currently, for instance, the Trilater-
alist media membership includes Mi-
chael Bloomberg (billionaire CEO of the
Bloomberg media empire), Michael Duffy
(The Washington Post), Sylvie Kaufman
(The New York Times and LeMonde), Car-
oline Daniel (Financial Times), Nicholas
Kristof, David Sanger, and Bret Stephens
(all three of The New York Times), Joy
Lo Dico (The Evening Standard), Tove
Lifvendahl (Svenska Dagbladet), Yoichi
Funabashi (Asahi Shimbun), Yurina Taki-
guchi (Nikkei CNBC and Forbes),Andrea
Mitchell (NBC, MSNBC), Ian Bremer
(GZERO Media), Lee Cullum (PBS),
Martin Weiss (Hubert Burda Media
Group), and Tom Kompas (Asia and the
Pacific Policy Journal), to name a few.
Yet with all this media presence, not a
word appeared in their respective outlets
about the TC proceedings, which we will
see is of momentous concern to all the in-
habitants of this globe. No, it fell to Patrick
Wood, founder and editor of Technocracy
News (who has been closely following the
Trilateral Commission for four decades) to
alerttheworld,ashehasdonesomanytimes
before, about the planned “crises” and “so-
lutions” the TC and their network of power
will be throwing at us in the near future.
Nikkei Asia took its headline from the
presentation by an unnamed Trilateralist
who declared, “Three decades of glob­
alization — defined as integrated, free-
market based and deflationary — has been
replaced by what will be a multidecade pe-
riod of globalization defined as fragment-
ed, not-free-market-based but industrial-
policy based and structurally inflationary.
This year, 2023, is Year One of this new
global order.”
WORLD
AP
Images
Planning our future: World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab meets with Chinese Premier
Li Qiang at the WEF’s 2023 confab.
2023
William F. Jasper is a senior editor of The New
American.
21
Call 1-800-727-TRUE to subscribe today!

2. Considering the history of the Trilateral
Commission and the power its members
wield, the statement is pregnant with all
kinds of meaning, none of it good. First
of all, it will not go unnoticed by students
of the French Revolution that the “Year
One” reference points to the complete
overthrow of existing society (including
throwing out the existing calendar) by
bloodthirsty Jacobins as they instituted
their new order. Cambodians Pol Pot and
Ieng Sary, co-founders of the communist
Khmer Rouge, studied the French Revo-
lution and joined the Communist Party
while studying in France in the 1950s.
Following their takeover of Cambodia
(with the indispensable help of Mao’s
Communist China), they determined to
top their French Revolutionary comrades
and “reset” everything, i.e., completely
destroy Cambodia’s existing society and
replace it with a Red (Rouge) utopia.Abig
part of that scheme was a new calendar,
in which their revolution signaled “Year
Zero” rather than the “Year One” of their
French counterparts. It also marked one of
the most horrific genocides in history, with
the Khmer Rouge murdering nearly one-
quarter of Cambodia’s population.
Now, by invoking “Year One,” the
anonymous Trilateralist quoted by Nikkei
Asia perhaps does not envision a bloody
Great Terror along the lines of Robespi-
erre, Stalin, Mao, or Pol Pot — at least
not immediately — but when we further
parse his/her statement we find little to
allay concern that that’s the ultimate des-
tination these power-mad globalists have
in mind. Adding to that concern is the fact
that the Trilateral Commission, along with
the other one-world groups we will be dis-
cussing here (the Bilderbergers, the Coun-
cil on Foreign Relations, and the World
Economic Forum), have been bringing
high-level members of the Chinese Com-
munist Party (CCP) into their organiza-
tions. At the same time, the corporations
represented by their membership have
been getting ever more deeply intertwined
with China.And this year, 2023, they have
been pushing their agenda with an unbri-
dled hubris to match that of Pol Pot, as
evidenced by a survey of the many follow-
on conferences of the globalists over these
past few months.
So the comment that our free-market
economy is being replaced with an econ-
omy that is “not-free-market-based but
industrial-policy based” is more than a
matter-of-fact observation about a con-
sequence of natural evolution. Consider-
ing the source, it should be viewed as a
form of advocacy. “Industrial policy,” for
the uninitiated, is code for “central plan-
ning” — meaning planning and control
by the government. It involves lots of
“public-private partnerships,” i.e., busi-
ness-government mergers. The United
States has been moving down that road
for years, with Biden’s Green New Deal
and Build Back Better policies being the
latest grandiose schemes leading in that
direction. Think of Communist China
as employing Industrial Policy 3.0+++.
The United States, on the other hand, is
moving through Industrial Policy 1.0, or
thereabouts. Under the Trilateralist Hege-
lian dialectic (thesis-antithesis-synthesis),
we would have a synthesis that would pro-
duce a global Industrial Policy 2.0+. Glob­
alists call this piecemeal forced melding
of communist and non-communist nations
“convergence.”
The globalists and communists are
masters of anodyne rhetoric. But lurking
beneath the velvet-glove euphemisms of
“globalization,” “convergence,” “not-
free-market-based,” and “industrial-poli-
cy based” is the iron fist of Xi Jinping’s
“Socialism with Chinese Characteristics.”
There currently are nine high-level TC
flickr/Ciaran
McCrickard
“Year One” poster girl: Meghan O’Sullivan, North American chair of the Trilateral Commission,
represents one of the elite groups of globalist movers and shakers.
THE NEW AMERICAN • SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
22
WORLD
The globalists and communists are masters of anodyne
rhetoric. But lurking beneath the velvet-glove euphemisms
of “globalization,” “convergence,” “not-free-market-based,”
and “industrial-policy based” is the iron fist of Xi Jinping’s
“Socialism with Chinese Characteristics.”

3. members from China, all presumably
members of the Chinese Communist Party
(CCP), and the TC is in the forefront of
promoting continued “engagement” with
the Beijing dictatorship. Nikkei Asia’s
unnamed TC member also lamented the
United States’ shift toward “competition
with China,” rather than viewing the total-
itarian communist regime as the avowed
adversary it has declared itself to be. This
has been the standard line of TC members
for decades and was recently underscored
in an article, also by Nikkei Asia, about
the December 2022 TC meeting in Tokyo,
which ran under the headline “Shutting
out China not the answer: Trilateral Com-
mission members.”
Goal: World Government
According to the Nikkei Asia report on the
New Delhi confab, the participants “were
generally positive” about the wildly popu-
lar ChatGPT and later jokingly asked the
bot to write a poem about the Trilateral
Commission. The AI program came up
with this witty (and revealing) ditty:
In secret meetings, you plan and con-
spire,
To create a new order, of which
you aspire.
Your goals are unclear, but some
see the end,
As a world government, with you
as its friend.
Undoubtedly, the AI doggerel elicited a
round of chuckles (and knowing approval)
from the assembled elites. But it’s hardly
a laughing matter. For, as we have been
reporting here for decades, world govern-
ment with the Trilateral globalists (along
with the Communists) in control has been
— and still is — the master plan. We are
not alone in so warning. In his book With
No Apologies, U.S. Senator Barry Gold-
water charged that the “The Trilateral
Commission represents a skillful, coordi-
nated effort to seize control and consoli-
date the four centers of power — political,
monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical....
What the Trilaterals truly intend is the cre-
ation of a worldwide economic power su-
perior to the political governments of the
nation-states involved....As managers and
creators of the system they will rule the
future.”
Of course, the Trilateralists are not alone
in this scheme; a plot so grandiose would
be beyond the grasp even of this club of
the high and mighty. To coordinate such a
plan would require a vast global network
involving movers and shakers with influ-
ence in the political, economic, social,
scientific, academic, media, military, and
religious fields. As we will see, that vast
global network has been assembled. It
is the work of many decades. However,
before moving on to discuss these other
partners in the globalist network, it may
be helpful to remind everyone just what
the Trilateral Commission is, who consti-
tutes this global aristocracy, and why the
actions and utterances of its members are
worthy of note.
Enter the Trilaterals
The Trilateral Commission was founded
in 1973 by the late David Rockefeller, bil-
lionaire patriarch of the Rockefeller bank-
ing dynasty, chairman of the Chase Man-
hattan Bank (now JPMorgan Chase & Co.,
the world’s largest bank) and chairman
(1970-1985) of the Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR). 1973 was the same year
that Rockefeller (known by friend and foe
alike as “Mr. Globalist”), leading a del-
egation of six Chase executives, visited
Beijing for palavers with mass-murderers
Mao Zedong and Zhou Enlai. He then re-
turned to the United States to pen an op-ed
for The New York Times entitled “From a
China Traveler,” glorifying Mao’s prison
state. “One is impressed immediately by
the sense of national harmony,” Rock-
efeller gushed, alleging that “there is very
real and pervasive dedication to Chairman
Mao and Maoist principles. Whatever the
price of the Chinese Revolution, it has ob-
viously succeeded not only in producing
more efficient and dedicated administra-
tion, but also in fostering high morale and
community of purpose.”
“The social experiment in China under
Chairman Mao’s leadership,” the uber-
AP
Images
Mr. Conservative: Former
U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater
(R-Ariz.) told Americans the
truth about the globalist
designs of the Trilateral
Commission.
www.TheNewAmerican.com 23

4. banker fantastically claimed, “is
one of the most important and suc-
cessful in human history.” Thus
began the massive, decades-long
transfer of capital, technology, and
manufacturing wherewithal that
has built Red China into the eco-
nomic and military threat that it is
today.
The Trilateral Commission
membership comprises about
400 of the top-tier elite of power
brokers in the worlds of finance,
politics, media, technology, sci-
ence, academia, military, and
intelligence. President “China
Joe” Biden has loaded up his ad-
ministration with TC members,
including Secretary of State Ant-
ony Blinken, National Economic
Council Director Lael Brainard,
Ambassador to China Nicholas
Burns, Ambassador to India Ken
Juster, International Monetary
Fund First Deputy Managing Di-
rector David Lipton, Deputy Sec-
retary of State Wendy Sherman,
National Security Advisor Jake
Sullivan, and Ambassador to Po-
land (and son of TC architect Zbig-
niew Brzezinski) Mark Brzezinski.
Officially, they are listed on the TC
roster as “former members” who are now
“in public service.” Of course the most fa-
mous of the “public servants” who is on
the TC member roll is former Secretary
of State Henry Kissinger, the Rockefeller
protégé who set up the 1972 Nixon-Mao
meeting and the 1973 Rockefeller/Chase
visit to China.
Meet the Bilderbergers
If the meetings of the Trilateral Commis-
sion are super-secret and super-elite, the
annual gatherings of the Bilderberg Group
(BG) are even more so. Established in
1954, Bilderberg attendance is restricted
to 120-150 of the crème de la crème of the
New World Order oligarchy. David Rock-
efeller was long a big wheel at Bilderberg,
and Kissinger, now 100, remains the émi-
nence grise at the BG confabs. The grav-
elly voiced centenarian was in Lisbon,
Portugal, for the 69th BG meeting held
May 18 to 21, 2023, at the luxurious and
historic Pestana Palace Hotel.
Aside from promoting the same agen-
da as the Trilateral Commission vis à vis
China, what do these would-be Masters of
the Universe have planned for us in the re-
mainder of this year and the coming
year? Economic collapse? A new
digital currency? Expanded surveil-
lance state? Global food shortages?
Energy grid collapse? Pandemic
2.0? All of the above? We do not
know precisely, but we can get a
general idea of the ugly agenda the
globalists are pursuing from the pol-
icies their puppets in business and
government are implementing, as
well as from the propaganda being
dispensed by their paid “pressti-
tutes” in favor of more Chinafica-
tion of the world and less freedom.
While including members of the
Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg
boasts a smaller and even more-
select A-list of world movers and
shakers of Big Finance, Big Busi-
ness, Big Media, Big Tech, Big
Pharma, and Big Government:
Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank,
Prudential, AXA, Google, Micro-
soft, Palantir, DeepMind, Open­
AI, Shell, Pfizer, Merck, Bloom-
berg, The Economist, The Atlantic,
Financial Times, Le Temps, NATO,
the European Parliament, the Euro-
pean Commission, the U.S. federal
government, etc. The group takes its
name from the Hotel de Bilderberg
in Oosterbeek, Netherlands, the location
of its first meeting in 1954.
Abrief BG press release announced that
about 130 participants from 23 countries
would be attending the Lisbon affair. “As
ever,” the press release stated, “a diverse
group of political leaders and experts from
industry, finance, academia, labour and the
media has been invited.”
Diversity? More
Like Global Conformity
Diverse group? Well, diverse only in the
sense that they come from diverse nation-
alities, occupations, and fields of exper-
tise. They are completely homogenous
and unified when it comes to worldview
and ideology. They are all in on the Great
Reset, their grand plan to “reset” humanity,
as Klaus Schwab and the World Economic
Forum (WEF) have infamously proposed
and are relentlessly promoting. Don’t be
fooled by false claims that Bilderberg and
WEF are competing organizations. While
the WEF is the larger, flashier organiza-
If the meetings of the Trilateral Commission are super-secret
and super-elite, the annual gatherings of the Bilderberg Group
(BG) are even more so. Established in 1954, Bilderberg
attendance is restricted to 120-150 of the crème de la crème
of the New World Order oligarchy.
AP
Images
Mr. Globalist: Perhaps no other modern personage has done
more to advance the cause of globalism than the late David
Rockefeller.
THE NEW AMERICAN • SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
24
WORLD

5. tion with its annual Davos extravaganzas
of billionaires, presidents, and prime min-
isters, it is a junior partner to Bilderberg in
the globalist scheme of things. Almost all
of the Bilderbergers are also WEFers, and
Børge Brende of Norway, president of the
World Economic Forum, was one of the
oligarchs at this year’s Bilderberg meeting
in Lisbon.
Bilderberg sits atop (or near the top) of
the globalist pyramid of power, devising,
revising, promulgating, and coordinating
the latest blueprints for their develop-
ment. The WEF, CFR, Royal Institute of
International Affairs (RIIA, also known
as Chatham House), Trilateral Commis-
sion, Council of Councils, Group of Thirty
(G30), Club of Rome, Atlantic Institute,
Aspen Institute, Brookings Institution, and
similar organizations operate as transmis-
sion belts of the Bilderberg party line, as
well as recruitment fields for placement
and promotion of Bilderberg-selected can-
didates into key positions of world influ-
ence. Thus, in less than 70 years, Bilder-
bergers have become the insiders’insiders
in the game of global machinations.
Kissinger, Rockefeller, and the
“Secret Cabal” Admission
The grand doyen of Bilderberg is former
Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, who
has been a participant of these events since
1957 (as well as a member of the group’s
Steering Committee for many years). The
cadaverous Dr. K attended the Lisbon af-
fair just days shy of his 100th birthday.
He is following closely behind his patron
and mentor David Rockefeller, a longtime
presence on the Bilderberg MemberAdvi-
sory Group, who died in 2017 at the age
of 101.
In Memoirs, his 2002 autobiography,
David Rockefeller made this startling
confession:
For more than a century ideologi-
cal extremists at either end of the
political spectrum have seized upon
well-publicized incidents such as my
encounter with Castro to attack the
Rockefeller family for the inordinate
influence they claim we wield over
American political and economic in-
stitutions. Some even believe we are
part of a secret cabal working against
the best interests of the United States,
characterizing my family and me as
“internationalists” and of conspiring
with others around the world to build
a more integrated global political and
economic structure — one world, if
you will. If that’s the charge, I stand
guilty, and I am proud of it.
Tyrannical Agenda, AI, CBDC
According to the Bilderberg press release,
the “key topics for discussion” at this
year’s BG summit were AI, Banking Sys-
tem, China, Energy Transition, Europe,
Fiscal Challenges, India, Industrial Policy
and Trade, NATO, Russia, Transnational
Threats, Ukraine, and US Leadership.
Although AI (artificial intelligence)
heads the list of topics because the topics
are listed alphabetically, there is no ques-
tion that AI is indeed a top concern for the
BG/WEF one-worlders. They understand
its immense potential for reengineering
and controlling human society. They want
to not just be able to know every move you
make and every breath you take, but also
be able to monitor (and even control) every
word you speak, everything you read, and
every thought you think. So, for the past
several years, AI has been a top priority
for WEF events and WEF participants
and contributors. Among the American
AI leaders at BG this year were Sam Alt-
man, CEO of OpenAI;Alex Karp, CEO of
Palantir Technologies Inc.; Satya Nadel-
la, CEO of Microsoft Corporation; Eric
E. Schmidt, former CEO and chair of
Google LLC; and Peter Thiel, president
of Thiel Capital LLC. And collaborating
with them on the political front are the fol-
lowing Biden administration apparatchiks
who attended Bilderberg 2023: Director
of National Intelligence Avril Haines,
Director of the U.S. Cybersecurity and
Infrastructure Security Agency Jen East-
erly, Senior Director for Technology and
National Security at the National Security
Council Tarun Chhabra, and Senior Direc-
tor for Strategic Planning at the National
Security Council Thomas Wright.
Concerning the topics of “Banking
System” and “Fiscal Challenges,” we can
be fairly certain, based on the escalating
prop­
aganda push by the various global-
ist organizations and their allied think
AP
Images
Friendly meeting: Henry Kissinger meets Mao Zedong in Peking in 1975. Globalist elites have
never shied away from meeting and cooperating with mass-murdering communist dictators.
25
Call 1-800-727-TRUE to subscribe today!

6. tanks as well as recent concrete moves by
central banks and governments, that the
Bilderberg elites discussed the means and
timelines for implementing central bank
digital currencies (CBDCs), along with
the concomitant outlawing of cryptocur-
rencies outside of their control, and the
eventual outlawing of cash.
“Master of the World”
In his keynote address to the assembled
globalists at the 2023 World Government
Summit (February 13-15), WEF top dog
Klaus Schwab chillingly rhapsodized on
the AI revolution. “And I agree,” he said,
“artificial intelligence, but not only arti-
ficial intelligence, but also the metaverse,
neospace technologies, and I could go on
and on … synthetic biology. Our life in
ten years from now will be completely
different, very much affected. And, who
masters those technologies, in some way,
will be the master of the world.” Schwab
and the WEF held their annual “New
Champions” summit in Tianjin, China,
from June 27-29, 2023, with opening re-
marks by Premier Li Qiang, who is sec-
ond only to Xi Jinping in the CCP thugo-
cracy. It was more of the same a couple
months earlier at the annual Boao Forum
(March 28-31) in Bo’ao, China, with top
globalists and communists singing the
same convergence tune. All of this pro-
vides very disturbing clues about the ty-
rannical system Schwab and his TC/BG/
WEF/CCP comrades plan to fasten upon
the world economy under their decep-
tively labeled “stakeholder capitalism”
and “inclusive capitalism.”
Communist China, the Globalist Model
On the topic of China, no “expert” — with
the exception of Henry Kissinger — is
currently more celebrated by the estab-
lishment than Dr. Elizabeth Economy,
Biden’s top China hand. The Bilderberg
press release describes her merely as “Se-
nior Advisor for China, Department of
Commerce.” Dr. Economy is much more
than that, of course. In addition to writing
many highly touted books and articles on
China, she has taught at prestigious uni-
versities (Columbia, Stanford, Johns Hop-
kins) and served as a longtime senior fel-
low for the Council on Foreign Relations.
Because of her more recent, carefully
measured criticism of China’s commu-
nist regime, Dr. Economy provides Team
Biden with a thin camouflage to disguise
its continuing pro-CCP policies on trade,
energy, climate, technology transfers,
capital investment, subversion, espio-
nage, fentanyl, migration, and more. But
it is all a rhetorical feint. President Donald
Trump’s China policies upset the 40-year
pro-CCP (and anti-American) program of
the Kissinger/CFR/WEF/BG cabal. Just
as important, those policies also resonated
with theAmerican electorate, which could
see the suicidal endgame of the cabal’s
pro-Beijing New World Order. So, Kis­
singer, Economy, and the rest of the glo-
balist choir have had to dampen their pub-
lic expressions of ardor for Chairman Xi’s
dictatorship. But, make no mistake, the
globalists have not reversed their treason-
ous path vis à vis Communist China; the
Trilateralists/Bilderbergers of Goldman
Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, BlackRock, Car-
lyle Group, Google, Microsoft, et al., are
pushing forward with their Great Reset. n
WORLD
The globalists have not reversed their treasonous path vis
à vis Communist China; the Trilateralists/Bilderbergers of
Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, BlackRock, Carlyle
Group, Google, Microsoft, et al., are pushing forward with
their Great Reset.
Kitinut/iStock/Getty
Images
Plus
Tool of tyranny: While artificial intelligence promises many potential benefits for humanity, the
globalist elites will no doubt use it to monitor, influence, and control the masses.
THE NEW AMERICAN • SEPTEMBER 25, 2023
26